‘THE CHURCH OF GOD

 

AND THE

 

‘CONFLICT’

 

The photograph above was taken along a road somewhere in South Australia. This road was one which our son Clive had never driven on before. It is somewhere in South Australia. As you can see it is very narrow, and extremely dangerous in many places. No telephone communications are available here; and this fact added more concern for our safety. As we continued there was also a growing concern for any unseen blockage which could be around the next corner! There were no places behind for us for several miles to turn the vehicle, and to reverse would only have added more danger. All of these unforeseen circumstances, had forced to continue, and trust in God for His protection to allowing us to end our journey - a journey along a route, which out of a sense of curiosity and adventure, we had taken. There was a warning sign which said: “Slow Down”: but the sign did not make us aware of what we had unwittingly gotten into, and had to encounter!

 

There is a spiritual lesson in all of this for born again believers; for it would appear not all of God’s redeemed children do pay attention to His warnings, or following His advice! It is my sincere prayer that those who read His Word, be given eyes to see the many conditional promises and accountability truths which are contained therein: and will find the grace, and the Holy Spirit’s help, to better understand how we can avoid the dangers, which we will, from time to time, have to encounter.

 

-------

 

 

SELECTED SCRIPTURAL HEADINGS

 

1

 

Ephesians 4: 22, R.V., - “…put away, as concerning your former manner of life, the old man, which waxeth corrupt after the lusts of deceit; 23 and that ye be renewed in the spirit of your mind, 24 and put on the new man, which after God hath been created in righteousness and holiness of truth.

 

 

Wherefore, putting away falsehood, speak ye the truth each one with his neighbour: for we are members one of another, 26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: 27 neither give place to the devil. 28 Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing that is good, that he may have whereof to give to him that hath need. 29 Let no corrupt speech proceed out of your mouth, but such as is good for edifying as the need may be, that it may give grace to them that hear. 30 And grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, in whom ye were sealed unto the day of redemption. 31 Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and railing, be put away from you, with all malice: 32 and be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving each another, even as God also in Christ, forgave you.

 

 

5: 1 Be ye therefore imitators of God, as beloved children; 2 and walk in love, even as Christ also loved you, and gave himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for an odour of a sweet smell. 3 But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as becometh saints; 4 nor filthiness, nor foolish talking, or jesting, which are not befitting: but rather giving of thanks. 5 For this ye know of a surety, that no fornicator, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, which is an idolater, hath any INHERITANCE in the KINGDOM OF CHRIST and God. 6 Let no man deceive you with empty words: for because of these things cometh the WRATH of God upon THE SONS OF DISOBEDIENCE. 7 Be not ye therefore partakers with them; 8 for ye were once darkness, but are now light in the Lord: walk as children of light…”

 

 

2

 

 

1 Peter 1: 17: “And if ye call on him as Father, who withour respect of persons judgeth according to each MAN’S work, pass the time of your sojourning in fear: 18 knowing that ye were redeemed, not with corruptible things, with silver or gold, from your vain manner of life handed down from your fathers; but with precious blood, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot, even the blood of Christ…”

 

 

3

 

 

2 Peter 2: 1: “But there arose false prophets also among the people, as among you also there shall be false teachers, who shall privily bring in destructive heresies, denying even the Master that bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2 And many shall follow their lascivious doings; by reason of whom the way of the truth shall be evil spoken of. 3 And in covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose sentence now from of old lingereth not, and their destruction slumbereth not. 4 For if God spared not angels when they sinned, but cast them down to Tartarus, and committed them down to pits of darkness, to be reserved into judgment; and spared not the ancient world, but preserved Noah with seven others, a preacher of righteousness, when he brought a flood upon the ungodly; 6 and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, having made them an example unto those that should live ungodly; 7 and delivered righteous Lot, sore distressed by the lascivious life of the wicked 8 (for that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their lawless deeds):9 the Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptation, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment unto the day of judgment; 10 but chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of defilement, and despise dominion…”

 

 

4

 

 

Numbers 14: 19, R.V.: “Pardon, I prey thee, the iniquity of this people according to the greatness of thy mercy, and according as thou hast forgiven this people, from Egypt even until now. 20 And the LORD said, I have pardoned according to thy word: but in very deed, as I live, and as ALL THE EARTH SHALL BE FILLED WITH THE GLORY OF THE LORD; 22 because all those men which have seen my glory, and my signs, which I wrought in Egypt and in the wilderness, yet have tempted me these ten times, and have not hearkened to my voice; 23 surely THEY SHALL NOT SEE THE LAND WHICH I SWARE UNTO THEIR FATHERS, NEITHER SHALL ANY OF THEM THAT DESPISED ME SEE IT: 24 but my servant Caleb, because he had another spirit with him, and hath followed me fully, him will I bring into the land whereinto he went; and his seed shall possess it. 26And the LORD spake unto Moses and unto Aaron, saying, 27 How long shall I bear with this evil congregation, which murmur against me? I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel, which they murmur against me. 28 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord, surely as ye have spoken in mine ears, so will I do to you; 29 your carcases shall fall in this wilderness; and all that were numbered of you, according to your whole number, from twenty years old and upwards, which have murmured against me, 30 surely YE SHALL NOT COME INTO THE LAND, concerning which I lifted up my hand that I would make you dwell therein, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. 31 But your little ones, which ye said should be a prey, them will I bring in, and they shall know the land which ye have rejected. 32 But as for you, your carcases shall fall in this wilderness. 33 And your children shall be wanderers in the wilderness forty years, and shall bear your whoredoms, until your carcases be consumed in the wilderness. 34 After the number of the days in which ye spied out the land, even forty days, for every day a year, shall ye bear your iniquities, even forty years, and ye shall know my alienation. 35 I the LORD have spoken, surely this will I do unto all this evil congregation, that are gathered together against me: in this wilderness they shall be consumed, and there they shall die. 36 And the men, which Moses sent to spy our the land, who returned, and made all the congregation to murmur against him, by bringing up an evil report against the land, 37 even those men that did bring up an evil report of the land, died by the plague before the LORD.”

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

[PART ONE]

 

 

THE CHURCH OF GOD

 

 

By G. H. PEMBER.*

 

 

[* The following is from VOLUME ONE and PART THREE in the author’s book:-

THE GREAT PROPHECIES CONCERNING THE GENTILES, THE JEWS, AND THE CHURCH OF GOD.”]

 

 

-------

 

 

 

PUBLISHERS COMMENTS

 

 

George Hawkins Pember, a contemporary of Robert Govett, G. H. Lang, and D. M. Panton, shared many of the same unique (to their time and to ours of this era) hermeneutic principles which categorized them into a ‘set’ by themselves. They were vastly ahead of their time and produced teachings which perplexed many and blessed many others. It is the latter group that feels deeply indebted to Mr. Pember and his colleagues for heavenly instruction. The best known work of Mr. Pember is EARTHS EARLIEST AGES (Kregel Pub. Co., Grand Rapids, MI) and it continues to be reprinted from its origin in 1876 by the fourth publisher. Having been an intense student of the classics in his unconverted days, Mr. Pember chose to use his vast knowledge of and very wide reading in them to glorify the Lord, which, in our opinion ... he has ably done.

 

 

The publisher solicits your original letters from: G.H. PEMBER, ROBERT GOVETT, G.H. LANG, and D.M. PANTON, for a future (D.V.) publication now being readied. With this statement, we mention that one of Mr. Pember’s letters in reply to a request for a photograph of himself, stated that he intentionally avoided leaving behind a photograph of himself ... as he didn’t want others to look at a sinner ... but to the Saviour. Mr. Panton suggested to Mr. Lang that they should reprint Mr. Pember’s works ... of which the latter three volumes were condensed into a one-volume edition in May of 1941. Since this time, only the very fortunate were able to secure the vast riches of Mr. Pember’s studies in the second-hand book stores.

 

 

With Mr. Lang, we say:He was pre-eminently a teacher of teachers, and one of the best exponents of prophetic Scripture during his period, so rich in great teachers of the Word of God. It is in the hope that, in the kind and perfect providence of God, the present volume may reach other and younger readers, eager for all heavenly knowledge, that it is issued. It will guide and fortify honest hearts for the wars of the Lord now upon us, in which the faithful must meet fierce and dangerous conflicts, and meet them with few older soldiers of Christ to lead and encourage them. The labour of preparing it is but a debt of gratitude paid cheerfully. If God shall graciously use it to enlighten, to sanctify, and to strengthen the witness of some of His servants, He shall be glorified and I shall be satisfied. There are other writings of Mr. Pember of high value which 1 shall be glad to issue, if God shall open the way.”

 

 

(from the Editor’s Preface of the

1941 GREAT PROPRECIES condensation)

 

 

SCHOETTLE PUBLISHING CO., INC.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

[Page 283]

I

 

THE MYSTERY HIDDEN

FROM ALL AGES

 

 

 

IN the previous section we have seen that, at the first advent, our Lord broke His covenant with the Jews, because they rejected Him; and that a suspension of the fulfilment of Jewish prophecy has, consequently, supervened - a long interval which seems, however, to have almost exhausted its term.

 

 

But what were God’s plans for this interval? Would He during its course remain without witnesses, and without a people upon earth? Not so: while the glory of Israel was tarrying, Christ should be a light to lighten the Gentiles, and thus reveal, in its appointed season, another purpose of the Almighty.

 

 

It was late in the evening of that memorable day on which the Lord ate the last Passover. He was still sitting at the table with eleven of His disciples: the supper was ended: the bread had been broken, and the wine drunk. The traitor [and apostate] Judas - though he had been suffered, like many others who shall never sit down with Christ in the Kingdom of the Heavens, to eat of the bread and drink of the wine - could not be permitted to share the great secret which was about to be disclosed. Therefore he had been dismissed, that the Lord might speak in peace the farewell words of love and hope to those whom He had chosen.

 

[284]

They had just been partaking of the joyous feast of deliverance, but there were no signs of joy upon their features: deep sorrow, nay, the very shadow of death, seemed to have fallen upon the little company, an every face had gathered gloom.

 

 

For they had heard strange and terrible things that night: their security had been dispelled, and their hopes utterly destroyed. There was, indeed, no excuse for their surprise: for in past time the Lord had more than once foretold the impending trouble. But they had neither heeded, nor cared to understand, His warnings; and were, therefore, entirely unprepared for the events which He had just declared to be then actually confronting them.

 

 

His first remark, before supper, must have excited their alarm: for He spoke of the intensity of His desire to eat that Passover with them before He suffered.

 

 

Then He announced that one of their number was traitor, and would betray Him.

 

 

That Satan had demanded and obtained all of them, that he might sift them as wheat.

 

 

That Peter, who had been so loud in expressing devotion, would deny his Lord three times in the course of that very night.

 

 

And, saddest of all, that He Himself was just about to leave them, and that whither He was going they could not then follow Him, though they should do so - [at His return, (see John 14: 3; cf.1 Thess. 4: 15-17, R.V.)] - in after-time.

 

 

This last-mentioned disclosure must have struck a death-blow at all their hopes. For as yet they knew nothing of the purposes of God: they talked only of Palestine and the earthly Jerusalem, and never dreamt that they were appointed to a higher destiny, that [285] heaven was their home, and the Jerusalem which is above their mother-city. According to their conceptions, Christ should have set up His royal standard, and summoned all Judaea to follow Him; should, after the Roman legions had been destroyed, have caused Himself to be crowned at Jerusalem, and then have placed them upon the promised tribal thrones. And now He spoke of going away; of leaving them, and abandoning the land promised to Abraham’s seed! All their expectations were shattered in a moment, and they were as those who see the beauteous forms of some fair dream breaking up and dissolving into the cold grey mist of morning.

 

 

But not only had their high hopes fallen; there was something even worse: for, if their Lord should depart, what would become of them in the world! He had been their support and stay, their guide, their help and defender in all danger, the One Who was never without resource to deliver them from every snare, to ward off every assault of their enemies. He had also been their joy; and if the Bridegroom should be taken away, what could the children of the bride-chamber do, but weep and lament for ever! Now they began to comprehend His dark saying;- The days will come when ye shall desire to see one of the days of the Son of Man, and ye shall not see it.”

 

 

Who would thenceforth be able to comfort them in times of distress; to speak words which could make their hearts burn within them, and lift them to hope from the lowest despair? Who would give them succour - [during these days of the church’s apostasy, and] in every perplexity, create bread for them in the desert, and command the fishes of the sea to bring them the tribute money?

 

[286]

Who, if their ship were again sinking beneath the storm, would bid the boisterous wind be still, and command the white-crested billow to fall back ere it broke? Who, if the Pharisees should excite a tumult against them, would stand forth and expose the hypocrisy of their adversaries with such clear and incisive words of power that the surging crowd would melt away, until there remained but a few awe-struck sinners, no longer threatening, but crying out with emotion. Never man spake like this man!”?

 

 

And if any among them should lie ill, who could rebuke the disease, and in a moment heal the sick? Or if the death of a beloved one should rend their hearts with anguish, who would turn their mourning into joy by commanding, even at the door of the sepulchre, with a voice which neither Death nor Hades could resist, Lazarus, come forth!”?

 

 

And who could supply His tender affection? For He had not been with them those three years without entwining Himself around their hearts, and making them feel that in Him they had a Friend indeed, Whose love passed the love of women, and Who was nearer to them than a brother. And yet He had just predicted that all of them would, on that very night, forsake Him in the hour of trial; nay, that one [of Hisdisciples] would betray and another deny Him!

 

 

We can imagine their despair: we can conceive the confused thoughts raging in their minds, like the wild waves of a tempestuous sea. Yet they could not disburden themselves: no sound escaped their lips, and a gloomy silence possessed the room.

 

 

At length the Lord opened His mouth, and broke the oppressive stillness with soothing words which shed [287] hope upon their hearts, even as His command, Let there be light,” had once gone forth over the shoreless ocean of earth, and dispelled its darkness.

 

 

Let not your hearts be troubled,” He said. Believe in God, and believe in Me. In My Father’s house are many abodes: if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I am coming again, and will receive you unto Myself, that where I am, there ye may be also.”*

 

[* NOTE: words shown in italics are mine. All regenerate believers who imagine that they can go to where He is today, are in error; and they negative the importance of ‘the first Resurrection’ (Rev. 20: 5,ff., R.V.)! See also Acts 2: 34,ff.; cf. 2 Tim. 2: 15-18, R.V.]

 

 

It is difficult for us to comprehend the surprise which these words must have occasioned to the disciples - if, at least, they understood them at the time. They had thought only of peace and glory in connection with the Jerusalem which is on earth, and such a vision would have been their sole consolation in the present distress; but the Lord removes this stay, gives them no hope of anything better - [before His return] - than tribulation in the world, and at last reveals in plain terms the great secret of God’s purpose.

 

 

He bids them resign their privileges and expectations as Jews; for He has called them to a higher destiny. Because they have received Him, He will give them power to become the sons of God; and they shall dwell, not at Jerusalem, but with Him where He is, that they may behold His glory. And though He is about to leave them for a season, it is that He may prepare abodes for them in His Father’s house; and, as soon as they are all gathered in and ready, He will return, and - [after their resurrection] - take them unto Himself for ever.

 

 

A few weeks later, when the apostles and some other faithful believers were assembled in an upper room, the Holy Spirit descended to baptize them into [288] one body [of both Jews and Gentiles]*, and to found the Church of Christ. And from that time God began to seek out for Himself a people from all flesh;* not, however, to rob the Israelite of his future dominion over the earth, but to sit in the Heavenly Places with the Lord Jesus, and in association with Him to become the spiritual rulers of the world.

 

[* NOTE: Beware of all errors and demonic teachings - especially the error of ‘hyper dispensationalism’ - which teaches that resurrected Gentiles will be given greater privileges than resurrected Jews after ‘the first resurrection’ (Rev. 20: 5): and that during the Millennial reign, resurrected Abraham, will have less privileges than resurrected Gentiles! Abraham, it has been said, will be on earth in a body of ‘flesh and blood; but Gentiles will have bodies of ‘flesh and bones’ (Luke 24: 39, R.V.)! That is, resurrected Jews will not be capable of any heavenly privileges in the Age to come!

 

This teaching is deadly error, and contrary to all the teachings of Holy Scripture! It falls into the same category, as the A-Millennialist teachings concerning our Lord’s future inheritance (Ps. 2: 8, R.V.) and millennial reign - upon and over this earth! See also Isa. 9: 6, 7; Jer. 23: 5-8; Ezek. 34: 23-31; Hosea 5: 15- 6: 1-3; cf. Luke 1: 32; 1 Pet. 3: 8-12; Rev. 3: 21; 20: 4, R.V.).

 

Now, at the end of the ages, and because of the apostasy and false prophetic teachings, Christians need to - ‘SLOW DOWN’ - and ask the Holy Spirit for His help, when they read and study God’s Word. All Christians today, are in desperate need of more respect for His warnings, and consequent judgment, (both now and in the future), against ungodly behaviour (Col. 3: 25ff. Cf. Heb. 10: 26-31; 12: 17, R.V.): and to show themselves worthy to be with Him during His Messianic and Millennial reign. We need to be amongst those ‘approved unto God’ (1 Tim. 2: 15, R.V.); and have divine strength to resist temptations to overcome every ‘DANGER AHEAD’; and to avoid being deceived by false prophetic teachers, who are content to travel along a dangerous road, which our Lord Jesus and His Holy Apostles did not take! See Acts 7: 4, 5, 51-60, R.V.]

 

* Joel 2: 28.

 

 

Thus the present age commenced, but there is no prophecy which will enable us to discover the exact length of its course. We must, however, remember that, although dispensations may overlap, and a short transitional period be the result, yet God cannot, with this exception, have two peoples of different callings upon earth at the same time. Such a law is implied in the prediction of Micah, that, because of the smiting of the judge of Israel on the cheek, the Jews should be given up for dispersion until the travailing Woman should bring forth - that is, until the number of [regenerate] believers [of both Jew and Gentile] should be completed. And when this point is taken up in the Book of Revelation, we are further instructed that, as soon as the Man-child is born, he shall be caught up to God and to His Throne; so that the way will then be cleared for the resumption of dealings with the Jews. Precisely similar is the teaching of Paul: for he affirms that a hardening in part has befallen Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in; and that, afterwards, all Israel shall be saved.

 

 

Thus the first sign of the end of this [evil and apostate] age will be the sudden translation of all waiting saints: and until that event has happened, there is no place for calculation. For, as we have before observed, the times of the Church are not properly a part of the Fifth [289] Dispensation, but a parenthesis fixed in it on account of the perversity of the Jews; an inserted period, unknown to Old Testament prophecy, and set apart for the preparation of a heavenly, and not of an earthly people.

 

 

It was, as we are told, at the end of the world,” or rather, of the ages,” that Christ appeared, and put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself. For when the Son of Man bowed His head in death upon the cross, there remained but seven short years for the course of this world. Mercy had been rejected; the time of forbearance was exhausted; and the terrific agents described in the Revelation were awaiting the command to speed forth upon their deadly missions, and execute the last indignation. But the wrath which had been gathering burst upon the Lord Jesus; the righteous sword of the Almighty was turned against the Man Who was His Fellow: and then God granted a respite to the world for which Christ died: then He checked the rapid flight of events, and, as it were, stayed the wings of the fleeting age, until a time [we are living in today] shall have passed the duration of which is known only to Himself.

 

 

For if the Church inquires when her Lord will return, she receives but the answers;- At an hour when ye think not;” “Surely I come quickly;” “Be ye therefore ready.” The great apostle of the Gentiles warned her of the futility of attempting to compute the length of her stay upon earth. But of the times and seasons, brethren, he said, ye have no need that I write unto you. For yourselves know perfectly that the Day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.” The duty of the Church [of the firstborn] is to keep herself in readiness and to watch, not to reckon times. But, as soon as she is removed, all will be changed. The Fifth Age will finish [290] its intercepted course; the Seven Years will quickly commence; there will be the Time, Times, and Half a Time, the Three Years and a Half, the Forty and Two Months, the Twelve Hundred and Sixty Days: all periods will then be capable of exact calculation.

 

 

But, if we cannot accurately compute the times of the Church, we are by no means without intimation of the present nearness of Christ’s coming. For we see Christendom beginning to assume its last form, and the Mystery of Lawlessness daily gaining strength; while the Jewish prophecies seem to be on the point of [literal] fulfilment. Since, therefore, the - [accounted worthy to escape’ (Luke 21: 36, A.V. cf. Rev. 3: 10, R.V.)] - Church must be taken away before any of these things is consummated, we may be well assured that the Lord is at hand, and should exhort one another so much the more as we see the Day approaching.

 

 

Moreover, besides other revelations in the New Testament, there are two great prophecies from the mouth of Christ Himself, the interpretation of which appears to intimate that the acceptable year of the Lord is almost ended. These prophecies are the Seven Parables in the thirteenth chapter of Matthew, and the Seven Epistles in the second and third chapters of the Apocalypse, both of which we propose now to examine.

 

 

The number of Parables and of Epistles is seven, that number being significant of dispensational completeness; and, in each of the two prophecies, we apparently have set before us seven successive phases, or characteristic epochs, of the Church, which embrace the whole of her career upon earth. These epochs commence in the order in which they are given; but any of them may overlap that which succeeds it or [291] even extend its influence, in a greater or less degree, to the end of the age.

 

 

II

 

THE SEVEN PARABLES

 

 

IT is usual to treat these Parables as if they merely contained matter for what is called practical application. This, however, as we hope to show, is by no means the case; they are a continuous prediction of the whole career of the Church between the two advents. Undoubtedly they will also yield an abundant supply of more general instruction; but in this context, at least, the prophetic is the primary meaning.

 

 

We have previously sketched the plan of the earlier chapters of Matthew, and pointed out the manner in which they lead up to and introduce the Parables as a revelation of a new order of things then about to be brought in. For, on the one hand, they relate the repeated offers of the [promised] Kingdom to the Jews, the proclamation of its laws by the King, and the exhibition of His marvellous credentials; on the other, the ever-increasing hatred of the Jewish leaders, and their refusal to recognize the Lord’s authority - a refusal prompted by so bitter a spirit that, when they are unable to deny His mighty works, they even dare to accuse Him of doing them by the aid of infernal power. By this blasphemous assertion their true condition is revealed: their immediate salvation is proved to be impossible; and, at the end of the twelfth chapter, the Lord intimates that they are about to be ejected of God, and delivered into the hands of Satan for a season.

 

[292]

A crisis in the history of the [Jewish] nation had arrived similar in some points to the time when Jerusalem was given up to Nebuchadnezzar, but involving a far deeper degradation.

 

 

For the earlier chastisement merely deprived the Jews for a while of their right to be the Kings of the Earth upon the earth.” God still retained them as His people, though He sent them into captivity, and caused them to be bound in affliction and iron. Consequently, at that time it was only necessary to appoint temporary World-rulers, until the Kingdom could be restored to Israel; and this was done by the transfer of the sovereignty to the Gentiles. And since the secret of the Lord is always revealed to them that fear Him, His purposes in regard to the change were disclosed to the godly Jews by the pen of Daniel.

 

 

Such were the circumstances connected with the assumption of the supremacy by Nebuchadnezzar, and the plan of the Gospel of Matthew is in strict analogy with them. But, in this second crisis, the Jews, by the rejection and murder of the Son of God, brought upon themselves a far more grievous punishment than the mere loss of their earthly dominion: for the covenant of Jehovah was now altogether suspended, and they were no longer recognized as His people. Yet it was necessary, during the interval which followed, that some witnesses should be chosen to maintain a testimony for Him upon the earth - without, however, infringing the power already granted to the Gentiles - and, accordingly, from that time He began to raise up a new band of believers who received a heavenly calling. And since the [293] Father would again, as in the days of Daniel, have some knowledge of His purpose revealed for the guidance of the humble, the Lord Jesus proceeded, on the very day in which He announced the rejection of the Jews, to unfold the mystery which had been hidden from the ages, and to foretell in parables what should befall the people of God during the interval between the Sixty-ninth and Seventieth of Daniel’s weeks.

 

 

That His discourse contained an entirely new revelation, we are informed by the Evangelist, who observes that, in delivering it, Christ fulfilled the prophecy;- I will open My mouth in parables; I will utter things hidden from the foundation of the world.”* Indeed, we are more than once reminded in the New Testament that the purpose of God in regard to the Church and the heavenly calling had been kept secret, until the Lord Himself disclosed it.**

 

* Matt. 13: 35.

 

** Rom. 16: 25, 26; 1 Cor. 2: 7; Eph. 3: 5, 9; Col. 1: 26.

 

 

Thus the Seven Parables were similitudes of the Kingdom of the Heavens, intended to foreshadow the varying conditions under which those who shall hereafter reign with Christ have been, and are still being, gathered out of the present age. And the main burden of the prediction was that this body would, during its stay upon earth, be continually liable to become clogged and corrupted by admixtures of evil; that it would be interpenetrated, surrounded, and even altogether concealed, by a far greater multitude [of false prophets] who would profess to belong to it, while they were in reality the children of the Wicked One.

 

 

The prophecy is, therefore, concerned with the whole [294] number of nominal believers throughout the world with every Church or sect which professes to derive its doctrines from the word of God, and in any way acknowledges His Son Jesus Christ. This vast and motley crowd spreads over the whole extent of Christendom in the largest sense of the term; while here and there in the midst of it, and ever acting more or less as a check upon the corruption around them, stand the scattered children of God, unable to extricate themselves from the press, and destined to continue unable, until heaven shall ring with the cry;- “Gather My saints together, those that have made a covenant with Me by Sacrifice!”

 

 

Now the whole of this great mixed multitude of Christendom is, for the time, called the Kingdom of the Heavens, because it holds within it - and so entangled that none but God can separate them - the true heirs of the Kingdom. Hence each of the Seven Parables appears to foreshadow some characteristic of the nominal Church especially prominent at a particular time. And they seem to be arranged in chronological order; for, to pass by details which we shall presently consider, they begin with the sowing, or first preaching, - [of ‘the word of the kingdom’ (Matt. 13: 19, R.V.)] - and end with the separation of good and evil at the close of the dispensation.

 

 

Yet, although they indicate the true succession of the phases which they represent, it does not, of course, necessarily follow that the period of one Parable must be completely ended before another commences: on the contrary, as we before remarked, it may overlap, and be contemporaneous with, that which follows it. We will now proceed to examine them separately.

 

[295]

III

 

THE PARABLE OF THE SOWER

 

 

THE first scene which opens before us is a large field already ploughed and prepared for the sowing. On one side of it runs a road, the wayfarers and waggons travelling by which have passed so heedlessly that they have trodden down and pressed the bordering ploughed land, until it has become well-nigh as hard as the highway itself. Extending underneath a considerable portion of the field lies a slab of rock, with but little soil above it; so that this part is quickly dried up by the sun. A third portion has rich and deep mould, but abounds in thorn-roots and seeds: the remainder of the field consists of soil both clean and good.

 

 

Presently the sower comes, and scatters his seed broadcast over the furrows. Some of it falls upon the trodden ground near the highway, and lies exposed upon its hard and smooth surface. Possibly it might yet sink into the soil, if it could be left untouched till heavy rains set in; but there is no chance of that. Multitudes of little birds are on the watch, and, as soon as the sower’s back is turned, snatch up and devour every grain.

 

 

Some seed, again, falls upon the rocky soil, and, being unable to sink far beneath the surface, quickly sends forth blades of promise. But the sun arises in his strength, and they soon wither and die; for the thin-spread mould is speedily reduced to dust.

 

 

Other seed is scattered over the place already occupied by the thorn-roots: it comes up well, but [296] the thorns also appear with it. It is not injured by the sun, for it has depth of soil; but the ever-increasing weeds draw away its nourishment and take up room, until, almost concealed by their luxuriant grow, it becomes sickly and thin, and cannot bring its fruit to perfection.

 

 

But the seed which falls upon good ground puts forth its blades in due time, and grows and produces much fruit, though in varying quantities; some grains a hundredfold, some sixtyfold, and some thirtyfold.

 

 

This Parable exhibits the first period of the Gospel dispensation. The ploughed field is the world prepared for the reception of Christ by previous dealings of God: the untilled highway is the bordering Kingdom of the Air, tenanted by those fallen angels and spirits to whom the offers of Christ were not extended; so that their realm is neither ploughed nor sown. The Sower is, first and principally, the Lord Jesus Himself, and, afterwards, those who succeeded Him in the work of carrying on all that He began to do and to teach. The seed is the glorious ‘word of the [kingdom,’ - Christ’s /Messiah’s good news] Gospel: the various conditions of soil represent the four classes of hearers which are found among men. And the fact that but one of these brings forth the desired fruit is a hint, at the very outset of the discourse, that all expectations of the universal success of the Gospel in the present age are false; that the way of the strait gate will remain narrow, and only a few, comparatively, find it, until a change be brought about by the [second] advent of the [true and coming] King.

 

 

The first class of hearers are those who live so nigh to, and in such close communion with, the Powers of Evil, that they have become similar to them, and [297] almost as hopelessly callous. For if men, like demons, do not care to retain God in their hearts, He gives them over to a reprobate mind, so that they have no further thought of Him. His Spirit is grieved, and ceases to strive: the sentence is pronounced, “Ephraim is joined unto idols, let him alone”; and henceforth they become more and more hardened. Therefore, the seed cannot penetrate their hearts, but lies on the surface, whence it is immediately picked off and devoured by the watchful spirits of the air, lest something unforeseen should cause it to sink in and quicken. And these agents of evil have countless devices whereby they can steal away the word - such as frivolous thoughts, idle conversation, pleasure-excitements, business-cares, and many other things. And so they destroy the germ of good from off the earth, that it may benefit neither him in whom it was sown, nor any of those around him.

 

 

There are other hearers, again, who have hearts as hard as the nether millstone, but overspread with a thin layer of sentiment. These receive the Gospel, or anything else, with an eagerness and a gushing enthusiasm which give hope of abundant fruit. But if, perchance, persecution appear on the horizon, or they be called to deny themselves an indulgence or convenience, they will straightway cast off their faith [in Messiah’s  promised kingdom], and, by their unyielding obduracy to all subsequent appeals, show how stony their hearts really are beneath the soft envelope. Such people will weep in their comfortable rooms over the miseries of others, but will rarely bestir themselves to aid the objects of their compassion. They delight in talking of what they mean to do; but, if any opportunity for action [298] should obtrude itself, usually find that they have need to attend to some private care, or social duty, which must take precedence of the Lord’s business. They are they which spring up on all sides in times of revival, and cast the greatest dishonour upon Christ by their apparent conversion and ostentatious zeal, for they quickly fall away, and practically, if not avowedly, disown ‘the faith’ for which they had professed themselves ready even to die. Their inner selfishness is firm as a rock; but, unstable as water in all other things, they cannot excel, and will be found at last - [as non- overcomers] - without the gates of the Golden[-age] City.

 

 

The mind of the third class of hearers is of a different order. These can think and feel deeply; but they can do so in regard to other matters besides the love of God in Christ. In their heart the word lies amid various seeds and roots, which will presently spring up into the deceitful pleasure-seekings of early life, the cares of middle age, and the desires of other things rather than God. Nor is the range of the last-mentioned temptations confined to such spheres as ambition, political power, intellect, love, hatred, or covetousness, can afford; they may be discovered in very unsuspected quarters. In some cases, for instance, they war against the soul by inducing a quiet indulgence of appetites, to which many yield, by no means so far as to provoke the rebuke of their fellows, but just so much as to incline their bodies to an apparently well-meaning indolence and complacency, which, while it lasts, most effectually bars out the powers of the World to Come. But, whatever their individual bent, the wheat and thorns grow up together in persons of this class. They would be Christ’s, but will not give up the world: they [299] persist in striving to serve two masters; and, since they cannot hate the one, find themselves quite unable to cleave to the other: they do not follow the Lord with a whole heart; therefore He will not accept them, and, at last, altogether withdraws the pleadings of His Spirit. Then the thorns choke the word, and cover its withering remains with their luxuriant growth. Fruit may have begun to appear, but it is never brought to perfection: these are they who are almost saved [to enjoy the coming ‘Kingdom of Christ], but lost [their ‘inheritance’ (Eph. 5: 5, R.V.)].

 

 

Lastly, there are some who, humbled and broken-hearted through a sense of their own sinful condition, receive the word with gratitude. These, realizing the horrors from which they have been rescued, are willing to give up all things for the love of the Lord Who redeemed them; to deny themselves daily, to take up their cross and follow Him; to count not their lives dear, if they may but finish their course with joy. In the hearts of such the word grows by the power of the Holy Spirit, so that they are enabled to be witnesses for their Saviour, and to do works which shall be their joy and crown in the day of His appearing.

 

 

A solemn thought is suggested by the mention of the rates of increase - some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.” Less than thirtyfold the Lord does not recognize: it is for every true Christian to ask himself whether the seed sown in him can yet have borne this minimum of fruit in the conversion and edification of others; nay, whether he has had any proof whatever that he is in the faith by the fulfilment in him of the Lord’s saying;- He that believeth on Me, as the Scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.”*

 

* John 7: 38.

 

[300]

To these four classes of hearers the Gospel [of the kingdom] began to be preached, first by the Lord Himself, and afterwards by His disciples. The latter commenced their labours at Jerusalem, and added three thousand souls to the Church on the very first day of their mission. So active, indeed, were they and their converts in spreading the knowledge of the Lord Jesus, that, in less than thirty years, Paul could speak to the Colossians of the hope of the Gospel, which ye heard, which was preached in all creation under heaven.”* And to the truth of this statement even Heathen writers bear ample testimony. For example, Tacitus mentions the arrest of a “vast multitude” of Christians at Rome only a year or two later than the date of the Epistle to the Romans. And about seventy years after the Crucifixion, Pliny, in his famous letter to Trajan, affirms that “the contagion” of Christianity had then seized, not merely on the cities of Bithynia and Pontus, but even on the villages and country places.

 

* Col. 1: 23.

 

Thus was the world sown in the first age of the Church: and during this time the prominent characteristic of the followers of Christ was an earnest propagation of their faith in every land; though, after all, their efforts were baffled by the generally unfavourable conditions of the human heart, and achieved but a very, partial success.

 

 

IV

 

THE PARABLE OF THE TARES

 

 

IN the second Parable there is also a Sower of good seed; but he is followed by a malignant enemy, who [301] comes while men are sleeping, scatters tares upon the wheat, and then steals away unperceived. The tares used for this evil purpose are still too well known in Palestine, and so nearly resemble good wheat in their growth, that it is almost impossible to distinguish them from it until the ear begins to ripen, when their fruit becomes black instead of yellow. In due time this proof of the admixture appears, and the servants of the lord of the field inform him of it, and ask if they shall go and pull up the noxious weeds. But he, after explaining that an enemy has done the mischief, tells them that the crops are now so inextricably mingled that they must be left to grow together until the harvest, when the reapers shall separate them, and shall bind the tares in bundles to burn them, and gather the wheat into the garner.

 

 

This Parable is also interpreted by the Lord Himself. The field is the world, and the enemy the Devil: but the meaning of the seed is not the same as in the first Parable; for it no longer signifies doctrines, but persons. The good seed are the children of the Kingdom; and the tares are the children of the Wicked One.” The latter are those hypocrites who are found to be suitable instruments for developing the deep and treacherous designs of Satan; who, though they know not Christ, will foist themselves among Christians, and make it the business of their lives to spread corruption, either in doctrine or behaviour.

 

 

Many such men crept into the Church even in apostolic times; but it is the history of the second and third centuries which affords the most terrible proof of the Lord’s foreknowledge. During that period multitudes of grievous wolves entered stealthily into the fold, [302] not sparing the flock; and many arose speaking perverse things to draw away the disciples after them. Then heresies began to spring up on all sides, heresies of every imaginable form and hue, and resulting in sects which in manifold ways weakened or altogether destroyed the power of the word of God, and provided an attractive but useless religion for every kind of intellect and disposition. The universal Church became corrupt, and has never thrown off the taints of this epoch: to the present day every Christian sect bears traces of them upon its tenets or ritual.

 

 

Only those who are acquainted with the literature of the second and third centuries can form any adequate conception of the multitude of tares which during that time were manifesting themselves by their black fruit: but the study of two works, which have come down us, will give some idea of the principal errors which Satan was then bewildering the Church. One of these, put forth in the last quarter of the second century, is a volume “Against Heresies,” from the pen of Irenaeus of Lyons, a disciple of Polycarp who had himself listened to the apostle John. The other is “A Refutation of all Heresies,” written by Hippolytus of Portus, a pupil of Irenaeus, in the first half of the third century.

 

 

From these books we learn that, at their early dates, the seed of nearly all subsequent errors had been imperceptibly sown in the churches, with a resulting crop of heresies, sects, and schools, so numerous that it would be tedious even to mention their names. And these heresies were of all degrees, beginning with a slight admixture of evil, and going on to such a pitch of madness that some even declared the accursed [303] serpent, the beguiler of Eve, to be the true Messiah, and actually styled themselves Ophites, or Serpent-worshippers. Another sect held that the Scriptures did not emanate from the Supreme God, but from a lower and malignant deity, whom they called the Demiurge, and who, as they affirmed, had caused the sacred history to be distorted, so that the righteous in it - such as Cain, Esau, the men of Sodom, and Korah  - were made to appear wicked, and the wicked righteous. Hence they regarded Cain as the first saint mentioned in the Bible, and from him named themselves Cainites.

 

 

During the whole period included by this Parable violent persecutions were occurring at intervals, and in the other continuous prophecy of the Church we shall find them specially noticed. Here, however, there is nothing more than a very obvious allusion. The Lord feared lest His Church should take a lesson from their oppressors, and, if at any time they had the power, put to death obstinate heretics. Hence the servants are ordered not to root up the tares out of the field - a commandment which may be easily understood if we remember that the tares are the children of the Wicked One,” and that the field is the world.”

 

 

In regard to the harvest, a difficulty has arisen in the minds of many, because the command, Gather ye together first the tares,” seems to imply that Christ will execute judgment upon the wicked before He deals with His Church. It is, however, impossible that such a sequence of events could be intended, or this passage would stand alone, and oppose itself to the general testimony of Scripture.

 

 

As an example of that testimony, we may quote the [304] fourteenth chapter of the Apocalypse, in which three classes of men affected by the Lord’s return are represented as Firstfruits, Harvest, and Vintage. And, in accordance with the order of nature, the Firstfruits, as we may see by the context, are those who will be redeemed from the earth before the Tribulation; the Harvest follows at its close; and still later comes the Vintage, the grapes of which answer to the tares of the Parable.

 

 

And again, in the nineteenth chapter, it is after the Marriage Supper that John sees heaven opened an the Lord appearing, with the whole Church in His train, to destroy them which corrupt the earth.

 

 

Indeed, if we turn to the last of this very series Parables, we shall find the apparent order of the second reversed: for the good fish are first picked out of the net and placed in vessels, and then the bad are cast away.

 

 

Now a right understanding of Scripture quickly dispels all supposed inconsistencies: how, then, can we explain this seeming discrepancy in parables of the same series? Probably by the following considerations.

 

 

In the original of the command to the reapers there is no word - such as “then,” or “afterwards” - to mark the apodosis to Gather first.” We must, therefore, supply one, and may do so in the next clause. For the “but” (…) which follows is often used adversatively, and may merely indicate an antithesis or contrast of destiny, without any reference to order of time. Thus the command will read;- First collect the tares, and then bind them in bundles to burn them: but as to the wheat, gather that into My barn.”*

 

* The reason why the Lord, in His description of the harvest speaks first of the tares is sufficiently obvious; since they are the subject of the Parable.

 

[305]

We may, perhaps, add that a farmer would not be likely to trouble himself about the tares, provided they were carefully picked out of the wheat, until he had safely conveyed the latter to its receptacle.

 

 

Again; we must remember that the two Parables are elementary and general: they are by no means intended to furnish details of the end, but only to lay down the broad principle that Christ will throughly purge His floor. The inevitable mingling of evil and good in the present age, and the certainty of ultimate judgment and separation, are the great lessons which they teach.

 

 

A peculiar Greek word, signifying “to gather by picking out,” is used of the tares in one Parable and of the good fish in the other; so that the meaning may be clear from both sides. Satan must sow his tares, and they will grow up with the wheat, and become inextricably entangled with it until the harvest. But before the Lord gathers in His own, He will not fail to pick out from their midst all the children of the Evil One. And again; while the Gospel net is lying in the sea of the nations, the nominal Church must needs include multitudes of merely intellectual, of sentimental, and of hypocritical members, as well as real [devoted and obedient] believers.* But as soon as the net is drawn to shore, just as fishermen carefully select the good fish to put into their vessels and then cast the rest away, so the Lord will take every soul of His own out of the great masses of spurious worshippers before He consigns the latter to their doom.

 

[* Keep in mind: The word “wickedcan also describe some who have been redeemed, but are disobedient, unrepentant, and apostate believers!Depart I pray you,” said the Lord through Moses, “from the tents of these WICKED men, and touch nothing of theirs, lest ye be consumed in all their sins” (verse 23)  So they and all that appertained to them, went down alive into Sheol: and the earth closed upon them, and they perished from among the assembly. … And fire came forth from the Lord, and devoured the two hundred and fifty men that offered the incense:” (Num. 16: 26, 33, 35. R.V.). Compare with 1 Cor. 5: 9-13ff. R.V. “For what have I to do with judging them,” - wrote the Apostle Paul (‘unto the church of God which is at Corinth1: 2,) - that are without? Do not ye judge them that are within, whereas them that are without God judgeth? Put away the WICKED man from among yourselves”: (verse 12)!]

 

 

In passing on to interpret the remaining Parables, we must keep one point clearly in mind. We have just seen that wheat and tares are to grow together until [306] the end; and, accordingly, in the seventh and last Parable we shall find good and bad fish mingled in the same net. It is manifest, therefore, that all the intervening Parables must also represent the Church conditions more or less corrupt.

 

 

V

 

THE PARABLE OF THE MUSTARD TREE

 

 

IN the third similitude, a grain of mustard - proverbial in Palestine as being the smallest of familiar seeds - is sown by a man in his field: and, with a solemn significance, the Lord tells us that this plant although really belonging to the class of pot-herbs, or garden vegetables, grows, nevertheless, into a tall tree.* This is an evident intimation of something wrong: for God would have every seed to develop according to the limits of its kind.

 

* Thomson remarks that he has seen the wild mustard as tall as the horse and his rider, and suggests that there may have been a perennial kind which grew into a tree, just as the castor bean sometimes does. See “The Land and the Book,” p. 414. Very possibly there is no exaggeration in the assertion of R. Simeon Ben Chalaphta, who says;-A stalk of mustard was in my field, into which I was wont to climb as men climb into a fig tree.”

 

 

In becoming a tree the mustard throws out great branches,* so that the fowls of the air, which in the first Parable caught up and devoured the good seed, are able to come and lodge under its shelter. Here then, is another very ominous hint, which, had it been duly weighed, would have checked the frequent, and undoubtedly mistaken, use of this Parable for missionary sermons.

 

* Mark 4: 32.

 

 

The grain represented the principles of the Church [307] as sown by Christ in the world: the description of its unnatural growth signified that those principles would be abandoned as the age rolled on - a prediction which was very manifestly fulfilled.

 

 

For the Lord charged His disciples to learn of Him, and be meek and lowly in heart during their sojourn upon earth; to cast aside every high thought, and follow their despised and rejected Master. But Satan, by means of false teachers and errors stealthily introduced during the period of the tares, prevailed on the great body of professing Christians to turn from the words of golden hope,Behold I come quickly - inscribed, as it were, by the Lord upon the blue veil of heaven through which He ascended - and to fix their eyes upon earthly things. He taught them to think of the cessation of human enmity, and of their own growing importance; and so allured their community in the direction of an eminence to which they could attain only by forsaking Christ and serving Mammon. Then, when the fitting moment had arrived, he approached them, and offered the present favour of earthly kings in exchange for the hope of the King from heaven. And, forgetful of their Lord’s example, they accepted the offer: like Eve, they were beguiled, and blindly consented to receive their power and influence from the Prince of this World.

 

 

The phase represented in the Parable began to be developed in the early part of the fourth century, when Constantine was carried to the imperial throne upon the shoulders of his British legionaries, the great majority of whom were Christians, and a nominal Christianity became the state religion of the Roman Empire.

 

 

Now it had been a frequent custom of the [308] polytheistic Romans to acknowledge all the gods, while they selected one of them as a special patron and object of adoration. And, accordingly, Constantine, in deference to the feelings of his soldiers, placed Christ in the Pantheon, and adopted Him as his favourite god; though, at the same time, he continued to worship the Heathen deities, giving the preference to Apollo.

 

 

For his religion was dictated by motives of policy and his desire was to weld his Christian and Pagan subjects into one people. To promote this end, a set of double-meaning symbols was carefully prepared, or rather, a number of recognized Pagan symbols were so adapted that those who wished might interpret them of Christ, while others continued to explain them from their own mythology.

 

 

Among these symbols was the mystic Tau,* the famous but obscene “sign of life,” known from the earliest antiquity throughout the whole circle of Heathendom, and marked in baptism upon the foreheads of those who were being initiated into the mysteries.** This was brought into greater prominence, and for Christians was made to signify the cross of Christ, while among the Pagans it retained its previous meaning.

 

* The great Phallic emblem. “It is high time that Christians should understand a fact of which sceptics have long been talking and writing, namely, that the cross was the central symbol of all ancient Paganism. What it represents must remain untold: but it was probably made the medium of our Lord’s death through the crafty devices of the Wicked One, into whose hands He was for a while delivered, with a view to the future corruption of Christianity, and the carrying on under its name of all the abominations of the Heathen.” - “Rome: Pagan and Papal,” by Mourant Brock.

 

**Another form of this symbol was the Egyptian crux ansata, the well-known sign of the goddess Venus.

 

[309]

Just in the same manner the device on the standard of Constantine, which he was reported to have seen in his vision, the Chi-Rho, was set before the Christians as the monogram of Christ; but the Heathen easily recognized it as a slightly altered form of the sign of Osiris, or Jupiter Ammon.* Besides which, it was usually set upon the top of the pole; while on the purple-silk field of the banner below were the heads of the emperor and his sons, which might be worshipped by the Pagans according to their custom.

 

* Jennings’ “Rosicrucians,” pp. 147, 180.

 

 

Another instance of Constantine’s policy is worth mention. The Christians of that time were scrupulous in keeping holy the first day of the week in remembrance of their risen Lord. Perceiving that this was in itself sufficient to distinguish them from their fellow-citizens, and to promote a party spirit, he issued an edict that the Pagans should observe the same day in honour of Apollo, the Sun-god, and should call it Dies Solis, or the day of the Sun. Very soon Christ and Apollo began to be more or less identified, and from this unseemly origin comes our modern term “Sunday.”

 

 

It was probably at the same time that the custom of turning to the East was introduced into the Church. For, however this ceremony may be explained, it is altogether Pagan, and is connected with the worship of the Sun-god. Its extreme antiquity may be known from the fact that, when God gave directions for the arrangements of the Tabernacle and Temple, He caused the Holy of holies in both cases to be set in the West,* in order that His people might be clearly distinguished from the idolaters around them.

 

* The longer sides of the Tabernacle were to face the North and South respectively, so that they extended from East to West (Exod. 26: 18-20). The West end was to be completely boarded, like the sides, because the Holy of holies was to be there (vv. 22-3). But the East end was the entrance to the Holy Place, and was covered with a curtain. The passage quoted from Ezekiel in the next paragraph shows the position of Solomon’s Temple, since the men who were worshipping the sun towards the East had their backs turned to the Temple of the Lord.

 

 

It is only by bearing this in mind that we can understand the deep significance of a passage in Ezekiel. That prophet, when relating how he was caught up by the Spirit and conveyed to Jerusalem to see the abominations which had provoked God to doom both city and Sanctuary to destruction, thus describes the last and greatest of them;- And He brought me into the inner court of the Lord’s house; and, behold, at the door of the Temple of the Lord, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the Temple of the Lord, and their faces toward the East; and they worshipped the sun toward the East.”*

 

* Ezek. 8: 15, 16. The number of the men seems to indicate that they were the High Priest and the heads of the twenty-four orders (1 Chron. 24.).

 

 

The confusing and corrupting effects of Constantine’s policy may be easily imagined: Christianity was transformed into a kind of Paganism with new names, and the world ceased to view it with disfavour. And, meanwhile, the private conduct of the emperor, inasmuch as it had to be condoned by the Church, must have greatly contributed to laxity of morals; for, among other crimes, he put to death his eldest son and his own wife, listening in each case to accusations which he afterwards discovered to be false. This caused his enemies to say, that he had become a Christian because no other religion offered pardon for such atrocities as he chose to commit.

 

[311]

Certainly, when the Church accepted the alliance of such a man, it might well have been said of her, as of Jerusalem, How is the faithful city become a harlot!” She had, indeed, grown great upon the earth; but instead of the presence of the Holy Spirit, the Comforter, the foul and rebellious spirits of the air came and lodged in her branches, took possession of her, and directed her; so that she ceased, as a visible body, to be a witness for Christ, and became a mighty instrument in the hands of Satan.

 

 

VI

 

THE PARABLE OF THE LEAVEN

 

 

IN this Parable we see before us a woman hiding leaven in three measures of fine meal;* so that the process of fermentation commences, and silently proceeds, until the whole is leavened. The interpretation of the scene depends, of course, on the meaning to be given to leaven, which has been commonly supposed to represent pure Christianity. But such an explanation could only have originated in the minds of men who had determined it by their own preconceived ideas of what the future should be, and not by patient investigation: for leaven is an unmistakable symbol of sin and corruption, as will appear from a consideration of the following points.

 

* The measures are probably seahs, three of which were contained in an ephah; while the latter seems to have been a full measure for baking. See Gen. 18: 6; Judg. 6: 19; 1 Sam. 1: 24.

 

 

I. The nature of the leaven used by the ancients, and its consequent figurative meaning in the Heathen as well as the Jewish world.

 

[312]

II. The apparent basis of the Parable in the Old Testament.

 

 

III. The invariable use of leaven as a symbol of es` in the Bible.

 

 

IV. And the fact that, if a contrary meaning were given to it in this instance, such an interpretation would involve a doctrine not to be found elsewhere in Scripture.

 

 

I. In regard to the first point, the only leaven known to the ancients was something sour; and the effect which it produced was incipient corruption spreading through the dough and rendering it sour, and, unless baked at the right time; positively corrupt. Hence, in speaking of bread, the Hebrews used “sour” for leavened, and “sweet” for unleavened. And hence, also, leaven became a symbol of corruption both to the Jews and to many Heathen nations.

 

 

In the Talmud it is a frequent figure for “evil affections and the naughtiness of the heart,” and, among other instances, we find the following prayer;- “Lord of ages, it is revealed and known before Thy face that we would do Thy will; but do Thou subdue that which hinders, namely, the leaven which is in the lump.” One of the Rabbis also says;-Trust not a proselyte till twenty-four generations; for he holds his leaven.”

 

 

At Rome, the Flamen Dialis, or High Priest of Jupiter, was forbidden to touch it; and Plutarch, the Greek historian, explains the prohibition on the ground that “leaven is both itself generated by corruption, and also corrupts the mass with which it is mingled.”

 

 

II. Our Lord, Who frequently founds His sayings upon something written in the Old Testament, appears to have taken the present Parable from the description [313] of the meat-oblation in the second chapter of Leviticus. That offering, which seems to represent the devotion of Christ, our Substitute, in service, was of fine flour; and, if the flour were in any way baked, there is an express injunction that no leaven should be in it. Moreover, this special command is immediately followed by the general precept;- For ye shall burn no leaven, nor any honey, in any offering of the Lord made by fire.”* Thus the woman, by putting leaven into the fine flour, was rendering it unfit for an offering to the Lord.

 

* Levit. 2: 11.

 

 

III. We are directed to interpret Scripture by comparing spiritual things with spiritual, and leaven is, without a single exception, used as a familiar and well-known figure of corruption in both Old and New Testaments.

 

 

The Israelites were to put it away from their houses at the Passover;* God would have none of it offered upon His altar* and it is expressly contrasted with salt, the symbol of purity.*** Accordingly, when Amos, in bitter irony, bids the people multiply their transgressions and provoke God still further, he tells them that this may be done by offering a sacrifice of thanks-giving with leaven.****

 

* Exod. 12: 15, 19, 20; 13: 6, 7; Deut. 16:  3, 4.   ** Levit. 2: 4, 5, 11; 5: 17; 10: 12.   *** Levit. 2: 11, 13.   **** Amos 4: 4, 5.

 

 

But, perhaps, the most striking instance of the figurative significance of leaven is to be found in the description of the Feast of Pentecost.* On that occasion two ordinary leavened loaves, made of the corn of the year, were to be brought forth from the habitations of the [314] Israelites to the altar, as the firstfruits unto the Lord. But, because there was leaven in them, they could not be burnt upon the altar and ascend from it as a sweet savour, and were, therefore, set down before it. These loaves, perhaps, symbolized the Church - which was called into existence on the day of Pentecost by the descent of the Holy Spirit, as a kind of firstfruits of creation** presented before God, but unacceptable to Him on account of the sin which is in it.

 

* Levit. 23: 15-21.  ** James 1:18.

 

 

Then seven lambs without blemish, a young bullock, and two rams, were offered for a burnt offering, as a type of the whole devotion of our Substitute Christ, even to the death. Each of these sacrifices was followed by its appropriate meat and drink offering, pointing to His perfect and willing service in daily life, His fulfilment of the second table of the Law for us. Then a kid of the goats was slain as a sin offering, a shadow of Christ putting away sin by the sacrifice of Himself. Lastly, two lambs were brought to the altar for peace offerings; to set forth Christ reconciling us to God, and restoring us to communion with Him.

 

 

And so, after the whole work of the Saviour had been thus represented, the two loaves were taken up and waved before the Lord, and - although they could not, indeed, be placed upon the altar, on account of their leaven - were, nevertheless, accepted and passed on for the use of the priest - a wondrous type of the Church, which, spite of all her faults, shall also be accepted in the Beloved.

 

 

The sin, then, which cleaves to us, and renders us unfit for the presence of God, unless we be cleansed in the blood and clothed in the righteousness of Christ, is [315] symbolized by leaven; and, in the New Testament, the Lord gives some hints respecting special forms of this evil by warning His disciples to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees,* the Sadducees,** and the Herodians*** - three Jewish sects which are never without their counterparts in the professing Church.

 

* Luke 12: 1.   ** Matt. 16: 6.  *** Mark 8: 15.

 

 

Passing on from the Gospels to the Epistles of Paul, we shall find other examples of the symbolic meaning of leaven. On two occasions the apostle, when exhorting churches to put away evil, remarks;- A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.” * And to one of these admonitions he adds the significant words;- Purge out, therefore, the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, even as ye are unleavened. For our Passover also hath been sacrificed, even Christ: wherefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.”** It is, then, an entire absence of all leaven which God desires in the Church; and we cannot consent to set aside the emphatic and oft-repeated meaning of the symbol in the single instance in which it has been disputed.

 

*1 Cor. 5: 6; Gal. 5: 9.   **1 Cor. 5: 7, 8.

 

 

IV. Again; were we in this passage to interpret leaven of a good influence, the Parable could only mean that all evil would be overcome by a gentle, gradual, and almost imperceptible process; and it would thus be made to contradict the whole testimony of the Bible. For the inspired writers repeatedly affirm that wickedness will increase, until at length it [316] shall be forcibly checked by the interference of the Lord Himself. The mystery of lawlessness had begun to work like leaven even in apostolic times, and it must go on until its true nature be revealed in the person of the Lawless One. It is needless to multiply passages which speak of evil men and seducers waxing worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived, of love growing cold, and faith waning; passages which predict that the world will again become corrupt and filled with violence as in the days of Noah, will be reeking with the foulest crimes, like the cities of the plain, so that the Lord will come forth out of His place to shake terribly the earth, and to punish its inhabitants for their iniquity.

 

 

Even in this series of Parables we are taught that wheat and tares must both grow together to the end of the age; that the children of the Wicked One will be left undisturbed, until the Son of Man sends forth His angels to gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; and that, after the net has been drawn to shore, the wicked shall be severed from among the righteous, but not made like to them.

 

 

There is, therefore, no doubt in regard to the Scriptural significance of leaven, and if it be accepted, the Parable falls easily into its place. The agent in the scene is a woman - the usual symbol of a system or Church; and the fact that she is secretly corrupting the fine flour, acting like the enemy who sowed tares upon the wheat, proves her to be the Harlot, and not the true Church.

 

 

The leaven is corrupt doctrine, and is explained for us by Matthew in the words;- Then understood they [317] how that He bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducces.”*

 

* Matt. 16: 12.

 

 

In the previous chapter we have attempted to describe the manner in which Christianity began to be Heathenized. The process of transformation continued, until the truths of revelation were entirely changed by the gradual admixture of human traditions and philosophies, which, like leaven, were not merely corrupt in themselves, but had also the property of imparting their own nature to that with which they were mingled. The earthly agency by which this strange result was achieved became more and more powerful under the name of “the Catholic Church.” And so effectual was its organization, and so vigorous its action, that in a short time the whole society of the Roman world was interpenetrated with its influence, and men regarded themselves as Christians when they were really polytheistic idolaters who had changed the names of their gods.

 

 

The three kinds of leaven mentioned by the Lord may be easily distinguished in this apostasy. In both the Greek and the Latin communities there has ever been a sufficiency of Pharisees, those who have, perhaps, some kind of faith in what they teach, but who put their trust in outward forms, in the traditions of men, and in the authority of their own Church; while they look down, sometimes with pity, but more frequently in a spirit of contempt and persecution, upon all who venture to differ from them.

 

 

And again; there is always a plentiful sprinkling of Sadducees, men who decline, more or less, to believe [318] anything which they have not experienced, or cannot understand; who disparage revelation, avoid all mention of the supernatural, and are ever unwilling to speak of the atonement; who dream that the new birth can be effected by education, human philosophy, and the practice of virtue and philanthropy; and who, while apparently acquiescing in the doctrines and practices of their Church, are in their hearts altogether indifferent to them; nay, are often possessed with a bitter spirit of scepticism which resents the very suggestion of God. When the false religion is growing old in a land, and its authority is becoming relaxed, these men are the fungi which draw life from its decay: they multiply in numbers and increase in boldness, until at length they throw off all disguise, and openly avow their real sentiments, and their hatred of every form of worship. Such are the dregs which Romanism invariably leaves behind it when all else has evaporated.

 

 

Of Herodians, who would support religion by the arm of secular power, and who consider political intrigue a fitting means for advancing the interests of Christ’s Kingdom, it is needless to speak. Men of this class have ever been conspicuous in the communities of apostate Churches, and in none more than that of Rome.

 

 

But there are also many misguided believers, of more orthodox views, who so mind earthly things that they are often found to be practically regarding the political questions of the day as more important than the far weightier matters of the heavenly Kingdom. And they persuade themselves to such a state of mind by the false assumption that the present work of Christ is to improve the world, forgetting that He bids us rather co-operate with Him in gathering His elect out of it.

 

 

Such, then, was the period of the leaven; nor have reformations or revivals, however great their partial success, been able to free Christendom from its pernicious influence. It is still found, to a greater or less extent, and in one or other of its forms, in every Church and sect: it continues to work in the whole mass of professing Christians, though sometimes one of its developments may be more powerful, sometimes another. Hitherto the Pharisean and Herodian elements have usually been the most prominent; but for a long time the Sadducean* has been rapidly increasing, and this will probably be the chief agent in forcing the mystery of lawlessness to its climax. All three will, however, remain active until the end, and, in their final development, are possibly represented by the three unclean spirits of the Sixth Vial, which will drive men on to the last extreme of rebellion, and gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.”*

 

[* Keep in mind: The Sadducees refused to believe in the Resurrection and Angels!]

 

* Rev. 16: 13, 14.

 

 

VII

 

THE PARABLE OF THE TREASURE IN THE FIELD

 

 

There is now a pause in our Lord’s discourse, and the remaining Parables are spoken to the disciples alone. Some turning-point is indicated, and possibly a more confined area, as though the action of this scene would, in the main, be restricted to a few favoured countries of Christendom. And so we seem to recognize the results brought about by the Reformation. The ceaseless working and rapid progress of the leaven is checked; but that is all: the leaven is not itself purged away. Only that which had been [320] active for evil now settles down into a cold inert mass so that the outward appearance of the nominal Church is that of a field. Nevertheless, hidden beneath its unpromising surface lies the heavenly treasure.

 

 

The description is wonderfully true when applied to the times of Protestant deadness which, quickly following the Reformation, lasted on with but few signs of life to vary their monotony until it was broken by the preaching of Wesley, Whitefield, and others. For after the enthusiasm of the conflict with Rome had passed away, men speedily settled down to a mere form of godliness, while they denied its power. They thought it a duty to go through their heartless services, but love had grown cold: they boasted of their pure faith, but failed to show the works which it should have produced. And a mournful proof of this may be found in the fact that two centuries had elapsed before they roused themselves to any general missionary effort.

 

 

Soon the peoples of Christendom among whom the Reformation had triumphed were divided off into sharply-defined sects, like fenced fields. Each of these sects held the life-giving doctrine of the atonement: but it was often concealed more or less by other teachings, which in some cases seemed to have been very imperfectly purged from the leaven.

 

 

During this period the number of believers was usually increased in the manner indicated by the Parable. A man would, as it were by chance,* hear [321] the Gospel of Christ, and, having received it, would in his joy buy the whole field, that is, accept, at any cost to himself, all the doctrines of the community of Christians in which he had found his treasure. This was a very characteristic feature of the times from the Reformation to the middle of the present century: the generality of good men, after finding the heavenly treasure in some professing body, while holding firmly, indeed, to fundamental and vital truths, would in other matters thenceforth read the word of God, not independently, but by the light of, and to prove the correctness of, the doctrines which they had adopted. And the various Protestant Churches, while conceding salvation to all believers in Christ’s atonement, were wont, nevertheless, to preserve strongly-marked lines of separation, and to remember their distinctive tenets.

 

* The husbandman found the treasure: while he was engaged in ordinary work, his ploughshare or mattock, perhaps, struck upon something which proved to be valuable. It was, then, an instance of what we call treasure-trove. And, consequently, the interpretation of those who see Christ in the husbandman, and His people in the treasure, leads to very strange results. Surely our Lord did not accidentally light upon His Church, while He was about some other business in the world! And His people can scarcely be called treasures at the time when He finds them: they become so afterwards, by His grace, as new creations in Him.

 

 

VIII

 

THE PARABLE OF THE PEARL OF GREAT PRICE

 

 

IN this similitude the scene again changes: the solid field breaks up into the ever-shifting waves of the sea, and the secret of the Kingdom [as a reward and inheritance] is found as a pearl in its lowest depths. This points to times like those on which we seem already to be entering; times in which the narrow boundaries of sect are becoming indistinct, and are little noticed, while almost every man holds his own peculiar opinions. And, just as the pearl lies far beneath the restless surface of the waves, so, in no [322] distant day, will the word of God be hidden beneath the many waters of perpetually changing confessions, creeds, sects, opinions, and philosophies; and still later, at the culmination of the great apostasy, its very existence will be almost forgotten. The truth of God will be no more found, as it were, accidentally - as a man unexpectedly stumbles upon treasure-trove - but only by means of earnest inquiry.

 

 

For in this case a merchant, who knows the value of pearls, is seeking for them; and the reward of his diligence is the discovery of the pearl of great price, to obtain which he gives up all that he has. The Lord thus signifies that, even in the perilous times of the end, those who are really desirous of truth will be guided to the great truth. But, as we learn from other prophecies, their sincerity will be sorely tested: they will have to turn away from that which is exciting the enthusiasm of the whole world in order to begin the search; and, when they have been successful, may be required to surrender family, position, property, and even life itself, if they would possess the prize.

 

 

Since, however, the merchant is able to find the pearl, we are taught that God will not leave Himself altogether without witnesses while the Lawless One is reigning: there will yet be fishers [of men and women], blessed of Him, who will be empowered [with the intelligence] to bring up His truth from beneath the troubled waters of human opinions, and to offer it to those who are honestly seeking for “glory and honour and immortality.*

 

* We must carefully bear in mind that the merchant does not dive to bring up the pearl from the deep, but merely purchases it from one who has previously procured it. Great, therefore, is the mistake of interpreters who find in this Parable a representation of Christ seeking and saving His Church.

 

[323]

If we look around us, we cannot but suspect that we are living in the transitional period between the previous Parable and that which we are now considering. Already, on every side, the fields of dogma are breaking up, and where one distinct and unalterable law was wont to prevail, there is nothing but uncertainty and innumerable opinions - opinions, too, which rarely claim to be derived from the revelation of God, but are avowedly based upon human authority, whether ancient or modern, whether ecclesiastical or secular.

 

 

The Protestant sects, as communities, attracted by human traditions and philosophies, are ceasing to hold fast the Head, and becoming less and less able to withstand the powerful influx of corruption. Those principles which used to characterize them are, like houses, surprised by an inundation, already tottering, and threatening every moment to fall through the violence of the floods; so that shortly nothing will be seen but the tumultuous waters out of which Satan will evoke the last great enemy of Christ.

 

 

Some twenty or thirty years ago, the first slight advances of Secularism were viewed with alarm wherever they were discovered, and the seven Essayists and Bishop Colenso regarded as strange teachers in the National Church. But it is not so now: almost all popular magazines and reviews teem with scepticism, and it is openly taught by those who might have been expected to act as barriers against it. Nor is the spread of Romanism, especially in covert forms, less remarkable.

 

 

The scarcely noticed summer stream has swelled into a broad and foaming river, and is bringing destruction with it from the mountains. We cannot hope to stay [324] its rapid tide; for it will prevail, until He appear unto Whom all power is given. But we must not, therefore, remain idle all the day: nay, we are exhorted to greater exertions as the difficulties increase and the end approaches, lest the Lord coming suddenly should find us sleeping. We can stand by the rushing torrent, and pull out many a one, who is being carried away by it, before his spirit is quite extinguished: we can warn others, so that they may avoid it altogether. And by the mercy of God there are still large numbers of His people thus employed. The energy of evil is for the present provoking some little corresponding energy of good; but of this we shall hear in our Lord’s second continuous prophecy. For in the Parables He deals more especially with the general outward appearance of that which claims to be the Church

 

 

IX

 

THE PARABLE OF THE NET CAST INTO THE SEA

 

 

The Lord has now completed the sad story of the mingling of Satan’s tares with the wheat of God: it only remains to speak of the final separation, which shall once more make it easy to discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth Him not. And this time of judgment is depicted in the Parable of the net.

 

 

The sea here, as often in Scripture, represents the world in agitation. So the Psalmist says of the Lord; - Which stilleth the noise of the seas, the noise of their waves, and the tumult of the peoples.”*

 

* Psa. 65: 7. So, too, in Daniel’s vision, the four Gentile World-powers are seen to emerge from the raging sea.

 

 

The net is the circle of the visible Church, all the Christian sects which are used for the gathering in of God’s people. We may, however, remark that nets do not catch all the fish of the sea, nor is even a mere profession universal. Also that, although fish of every kind are caught, there are at last but two sorts : all are either good or bad.

 

 

The net is not brought to the shore, which is the end of this age of restless confusion, until it is full: for God has fore-ordained how many of the human race shall come within the circle of the Gospel during the times of the Gentiles. And the first indication that it has been drawn up will be the removal of a number of believers into the presence of their Lord: then the separating process will be continued by a second ascension of saints, at the sounding of the seventh trumpet; and finished by the appearing of the Lord in glory and the destruction of the wicked. Thus the good will first be gathered into vessels, and then the bad will be cast away.

 

 

X

 

SUMMARY OF THE SEVEN PARABLES

 

 

Such, then, is the first great revelation in regard to the career of the nominal Church. The Lord sows good seed; but the bad soil of human hearts renders it for the most part unfruitful. And where it is growing well, an enemy causes disastrous confusion by stealthily introducing disguised children of the Wicked One among the children of the Kingdom. Changed by this evil admixture, the professing Church casts off her humility, and, ceasing to wait for the Lord from heaven, strives [326] to establish herself upon earth. Throwing aside the cross, she desires to say, I sit a queen, and am no widow; and, in order to gratify her ambition, enters into a shameful alliance with the great ones of earth, and suffers the Powers of Darkness, the devourers of the word, to take shelter in her branches. With such counsellors and helpers she organizes herself, and so corrupts the whole word of God by the teachings of demons that it can no longer be recovered, any more than fine flour can be again purified from that which has once leavened it. After a while there follows a time of partial revival, corresponding to the reformation of the Jews under Zerubbabel and Joshua, but also resembling that movement in its speedy subsidence to apathy and deadness. During this period, however, the word is able to be separated from the field, though it could not be recovered from the leaven, and many a one comes upon it unexpectedly, and receives it with joy as a great treasure, although in order to obtain it he must needs buy the whole field. Then the word is again hidden; not, however, at this time by fixed and rigid dogmas, but by opinions of perplexing variety which are ever shifting like the waves of the sea. Yet the agitated and threatening state of the world moves some to search earnestly for Divine revelation and truth, and those who do so find the pearl of great price, and if they are willing to give up all else, may possess and enjoy it. At the close of this period the Lord suddenly begins to pass in review the whole of Christendom, all the nations who have heard His Gospel, and by taking those who have accepted it to Himself, and casting the obstinately rebellious into a furnace of fire, at length effects the separation which His servants are not [327] permitted to attempt, and finishes the mystery of God.

 

 

Who can thoughtfully consider these Parables and refuse to admit their striking fulfilment, thus far, in the history of the professing Church, together with the grave inference that the days of this dispensation are numbered?

 

 

XI

 

THE PLAN OF THE APOCALYPSE

 

 

Before we examine the prophecy contained in the Epistles to the Seven Churches, it will be necessary to have some idea of the general scheme of the Apocalypse - that last gift of the Lord Jesus to His people, that book without a little understanding of which it is unlikely that any Christian will be kept from the delusions, religious and political, which are now overspreading the earth. Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear, the words of the prophecy, and keep the things which are written therein: for the time is at hand.”

 

 

The beloved apostle was suffering affliction, on the barren island of Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ,” when the revelation was made to him.

 

 

He was, as he tells us, “in spirit on the Lord’s day,” that is, according to the majority of interpreters, “in spirit on the first day of the week.” But by such an explanation John is made to introduce a term unknown to the New Testament in place of the invariable designation of the Christian Sabbath. Moreover, the sense thus educed is weak and inadequate, having no apparent connection with the revelations which follow.

 

[328]

To us, then, although we admit a slight grammatical difficulty,* the rendering, I was in spirit in the Day of the Lord,” seems far more probable, and by adopting it we both secure a vigorous sense which bears upon the whole. Book, and at the same time preserve for the expression, “the Lord’s day,” or the day belonging to the Lord, that meaning which, however much subsequent usage may have departed from it, is always retained in the Old and New Testaments.

 

* We speak of it as slight, because the Greek of the Apocalypse is by no means severe Attic, and John may have had in mind rather the fact that he found himself in the Day of the Lord than that he was projected thither. In that case there would be little difference between the construction of this sentence and the [Greek words…] of the preceding verse.

 

A good parallel to [the Greek words …], in the sense of the Day of the Lord, may be found in Paul’s use of … “man’s day” in opposition to it. See 1 Cor. 4: 3-5. The E. V. has “man’s judgment,” which is, however, an exposition, not a translation.

 

 

By the words in spirit John explains his own condition: he was not, like Paul on a similar occasion, uncertain in regard to it, but fully aware that he was out of the body and on the plane of spirit. “In the Day of the Lord,” on the contrary, has reference to the external surroundings in which he found himself, and furnishes us with a general clue for the interpretation of the visions. A strictly analogous description may be found in the second verse of the fourth chapter, where he says;- And immediately I was in spirit: and, behold, a Throne.”

 

 

If the clause be thus understood, it contains an announcement that the vision is for the time of the end, dealing first with Christ’s judgment of the whole career of His Church, and then passing on to the last of the Seventy Weeks in which He will have His great [329] controversy with Jew and Gentile. Such a meaning will be in exact accord with the nineteenth verse, and also, as we shall presently see, with the whole structure of the Book.

 

 

While, then, in spirit, and disengaged from earthly things, John suddenly heard behind him a great voice, like that of a trumpet, saying;- “What thou seest, write in a book, and send it to the Seven Churches; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.”

 

 

At the sound of this voice John turned, and beheld a vision which, at first, may have suggested to him the Holy Place of the Temple. But it was not the Temple: for he quickly perceived an absence of familiar objects; there was neither altar of incense, nor table of shewbread. Nor was he gazing upon any of those heavenly realities which were shown as a pattern to Moses on the Mount; for, in place of a single seven-branched lampstand, seven distinct lamps were set before him.

 

 

What he saw was the heavenly Sanctuary arranged for the present parenthetical dispensation. And, consequently, all that had formerly represented Christ was now removed, because He was present in His own person: John beheld nothing save the Lord and the symbols of the Church for which He had died. There were seven separate lamps of gold, connected only by their association with a glorious Priestly Figure walking in the midst of them.

 

 

But why this change from the one seven-branched lamp of Israelitish times?* The Lord Himself presently 330 gives the reason: each lamp represents the Church of a particular place; so that they indicate locality, and not, as some have supposed, the human divisions of sect, which could never be recognized in the heavenly Sanctuary.

 

* It will, perhaps, occur to the reader that there were ten lampstands in the Temple of Solomon (1 Kings 7: 49; 2 Chron. 4: 7). But we are not told what became of the original light which had stood in the Tabernacle, and may, therefore, probably conclude that it occupied its proper place in the Temple, and understand, with the Rabbis, that the ten were additional to it and distinct in meaning. For in the reign of Abijah we still find mention of a single lampstand of gold which it was the priest’s duty to keep burning throughout the night (2 Chron. 13: 11).

 

In the Temples of Zerubbabel (1 Mace. 1: 21; 4: 49) and Herod, also, we hear of but one, which, upon the destruction of its last resting place, was carried to Rome, and, after having graced the triumph of Titus, was deposited in the Temple of Peace. According to one legend it was finally lost in the Tiber, having fallen into the water from the Milvian bridge during the headlong flight of Maxentius from Constantine.

 

 

In the previous dispensation there had been one earthly and visible centre of worship; and, to signify this, the lamp of the Tabernacle was in one piece. But now there is no Jerusalem to which men must go: true worshippers must worship the Father in spirit and in truth. And the Church of Christ is defined for us as consisting of all that call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ in every place, their Lord and ours.”* Therefore in every locality the whole body of believers, to whatever outward denomination they may individually belong, collectively form the lamp of that place.

 

* 1 Cor. 1: 2.

 

Alas! that Christians should so often ignore this fact of their unity; or, if their lips confess it, convict themselves of hypocrisy by their deeds! Yet, even though they be born again, God can only delight in them while they are walking as brethren; for they are members of Christ’s body, of His flesh and of His bones. The 331 distinctions of sect, however impossible it may be to get rid of them in this present distress, owe their existence to human sin and lack of love. Consequently, they will altogether disappear when the Church is glorified, and should be kept as much as possible out of sight in the Church militant.

 

 

Standing, then, in the midst of the golden lamps was the majestic form of the High Priest Who has entered into the heavens, now to appear in the presence of God for us. John did not, however, see Him in the heavenly Holy of holies turned toward God in intercession, but in the Holy Place watching the lamps, that is, directing and judging His Church. He was not yet clad in the robes of glory and beauty: for His dress apparently corresponded to the linen garments which were used in ordinary priestly service, and especially by the High Priest on the great Day of Atonement. Then, after the sin-offerings had been sacrificed, the atonement in the Holy of holies accomplished, and the scape-goat sent away, Aaron put off the garb of service in the Holy Place, and, clothing himself in his splendid array, lifted up the veil, and appeared to the waiting people in token that their iniquity was covered. But Christ’s intercession was not yet ended: it was not the time for Him to fulfil this type by appearing to them that look for Him without sin unto salvation.

 

 

He was clad in a garment reaching down to the feet, and girt with a golden girdle. His head and His hair were white and lustrous; His eyes like flames of fire; His feet as brass glowing in the furnace; and an effort is made to give some idea of the fulness and majesty of His voice by the glorious comparison that it was as the sound of many waters. In His right 332 hand - held, perhaps, as a garland - were seven stars; and out of His mouth went a sharp two-edged sword: while the face, in which there was once no beauty to be desired, the visage, which was so marred more than any man, was now resplendent as the sun shining in his strength.

 

 

And although even this was far from being the fulness of His glory, yet the beloved disciple was unable to bear it, and fell at His feet as dead.

 

 

Then the Lord touched him, and again John heard the loving words, “Fear not,” and was strengthened to receive the command;-Write the things which thou sawest, and the things which are, and the things which shall come to pass after these.”* It was thus evidently implied that the revelation to be written by the apostle would consist of three distinct parts: unless, therefore, we can so divide the Apocalypse, it is useless to think of interpreting it.

 

* Dean Alford strongly supports a different rendering of this verse;-Write the things which thou sawest, and what things they signify, and the things which are about to happen after these.” The change is scarcely necessary, and, if it be preferred, does not affect our interpretation. For the exposition of what John saw must still reveal the things that are, or the present Church-period as symbolised by the lampstands in the Sanctuary. And the first verse of the fourth chapter still marks the transition from this dispensation to that which shall follow it.

 

 

Now in regard to the first division there can be no difficulty: the things which thou sawest* can only refer to the vision of the heavenly Sanctuary, by which 333 the difference between the Christian Church and the Jewish system had been exhibited, and the solemn fact revealed that the Lord’s eyes of flame are ever upon those who profess to be His.

 

* The aorist tense …, which should be rendered, “thou sawest,” and which is repeated in the following verse, seems to imply that the vision had already passed away. In the fourth and succeeding chapters the Sanctuary is altogether different. The laver, the altars, and, finally, the ark of the covenant, reappear, showing that the prophecy is then concerned with the Jews of the last days.

 

 

The things that are” - or a prophetic outline of the phases of the nominal Church, which were to succeed each other during the present age - naturally follow in the next chapter. They are also continued in the third, but no further: for, in the first verse of the fourth chapter, John sees a door opened in heaven, and hears a voice saying;- Come up hither, and I will show thee the things which must come to pass after these.”

 

 

Then the scene is shifted from earth to heaven and the ascent of the apostle is doubtless a type of that translation of believers which will close “the things that are,” and announce the approaching resumption of the suspended covenant with Israel. Henceforth the Church disappears from the prophecy; and the very name occurs no more till we come to the sixteenth verse of the twenty-second chapter, where “the Churches” are indeed mentioned, but merely as those to whom testimony is given, and not as having any part in the scenes of terror which shall characterize “the things that must be after these.” This fact is in itself a most significant hint of the removal of believers from earth before the judgments of the seals, trumpets, or vials, begin; and there is yet stronger evidence of a change of dispensation in the fourth and following chapters.

 

 

For we must not forget the difference between the previous age and the present time of grace, in that God had then a visible Kingdom upon earth, which is 334 not the case now. Consequently, during that period, judgment was to be executed upon those who broke His law: vengeance, as we so often find in the Psalms was imprecated upon all who feared Him not; and it was right to destroy His enemies with the sword.

 

 

But the [Holy] Spirit descended upon our Lord in the form of a harmless dove: and, accordingly, we discover nothing in His teaching or example analogous to the slaying of the firstborn, or the overwhelming of Pharaoh and his host in the Red Sea; nothing like the extirpation of the Canaanites, or the calling down of fire from heaven to consume the adversaries. On the contrary, when His disciples would have had Him imitate Elijah, He replied;- Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.” Hence any desire of vengeance is unlawful for believers of our age: we are required to love our enemies; and even if we should be persecuted to the death, have for our prayers only such models as, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do; or, “Lord, lay not this sin to their charge.”

 

 

The [Holy] Spirit will, however, in His dove-like form, ascend with the translated Church; and, therefore, in the fourth chapter His influence is very differently represented as seven torches of fire burning before the throne - an appearance which corresponds with Isaiah’s prophecy that God will, in the times of the end, purge the blood of Jerusalem from the midst thereof by the Spirit of judgment, and by the Spirit of burning.”

 

 

And this change in the form of the Heavenly Power soon manifests its solemn meaning: for, in the sixth 335 chapter, the plagues of God begin to trouble the world, and the martyrs beneath the altar are heard crying for vengeance. Nor does their petition seem strange when, in the seventh chapter, we discover that Israelites are again the people of the Lord, and that those who are sealed for preservation are of the Twelve Tribes. And, a little later, the commission given to the Two Witnesses to destroy those who would hurt them, and the terrible severity with which they exercise their power, prove that they also are not subject to the laws now in force, but are connected with the dispensation of Moses and Elijah.

 

 

It will thus be seen that the plan of the Apocalypse presents no serious difficulty, provided that we remember its threefold division, and interpret it by means of the great clue, the prophecy of the Seventy Weeks, We may sum up its contents as follows.

 

 

Chap. 1. is a vision of the heavenly Sanctuary prepared for these present times.

 

 

Chaps. 2. and 3. reveal the whole career of the visible Church, from the close of the Apostolic period until the Lord comes.

 

 

Chaps. 4. and 5. exhibit the preparations in heaven for the judgments of the Last Week.

 

 

Chaps. 6. - 18. describe the appalling culmination of wickedness in the last seven years: they also foretell the judgments by which those who corrupt the earth shall be destroyed, while the remnant of Israel is being purged and delivered from the oppression of the world by such fearful signs, and wonders, and plagues, that it shall no more be said;- “The Lord liveth, that brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; but, the Lord liveth, that brought 336 up the children of Israel from the land of the North, and from all the lands whither He had driven them.” These chapters are generally consecutive: we have first the seals, the seventh of which includes the seven trumpets; and then the last trumpet is developed into the seven vials, the final plagues by which the wrath of God is completed. Chaps. 11. - 15. seem to be a parenthesis inserted for the purpose of supplying details of the times of the seals, trumpets, and vials. The seventeenth chapter is partly concerned with the previous history of the Woman and the Beast, in order that the last scene in their joint history may be better understood: the eighteenth describes the fall of Babylon the Great.

 

 

Chaps. 19. - 22. treat of the appearing of the Lord, of the destruction of His enemies, and of the setting up of His [Messianic and Millennial] Kingdom. Then there is a brief notice of a rebellion which will follow the loosing of Satan from the abyss at the end of the thousand years, and also of the last judgment; and the prophecy closes with a description of the heavenly city.

 

 

If it be thus interpreted, the Revelation is no longer a sealed book. Those portions of it which have already become history may be explained without difficulty; while the remainder is, in general outline at least, sufficiently easy of comprehension.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

[PART TWO]

 

 

CONFLICT

 

 

By THOMAS CHARLES EDWARDS, D.D.*

 

 

[* From CHAPTER XIV (pp. 272-289) in the author’s book: “The Epistle To The Hebrews.”]

 

 

 

 

LONDON:

 

HODDER AND STOUGHTON,

 

27. PATERNOSTER ROW

 

 

 

MDCCCLXXXVIII

 

 

-------

[PAGE 272]

 

 

Therefore let us also, seeing we are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus the Author and Perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the Cross, despising shame, and hath sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. For consider Him that hath endured such gainsaying of sinners against themselves, that ye wax not weary, fainting in your souls. We have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin: and ye have forgotten the exhortation, which reasoneth with you as with sons*,

 

[* BOLD type throughout is mine and used for emphasis.]

 

My son, regard not lightly the chastening of the Lord,

Nor faint when thou art reproved of Him;

For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth,

And scourgeth every son whom He receiveth.

 

 

It is for chastening that ye endure; God dealeth with you as with sons for what son is there whom his father chasteneth not? But if ye are without chastening, whereof all have been made partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore, we had the fathers of our flesh to chasten us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us as seemed good to them; but He for our profit, that we may be partakers of His holiness. All chastening seemeth for the present to be not joyous, but grievous: yet afterward it yieldeth peaceable fruit unto them that have been exercised thereby, even the fruit of righteousness. Wherefore lift up the hands that hang down, and the palsied knees; and make straight paths for your feet, that that which is lame be not turned out of the way, but rather be healed. Follow after peace with all men, and the sanctification without which no man shall see the Lord: looking carefully lest there be any man that falleth short of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby the many be defiled; lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one mess of meat sold his own birthright. For ye know that even when he afterward desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected (for he found no place of repentance), though he sought it diligently with tears.” - HEB. 12: 1-17 (R.V.).

 

 

*       *       *

[273]

 

 

[PART TWO]

 

CHAPTER XIV

 

 

CONFLICT*

 

[*THIS IS THE GREATEST DANGER FOR THOSE WHO ARE TEMPTED TO COMPROMISE

WITH GOD’S COMMANDS AND TRUTHS: (SEE EZEKIEL 3. & 33, R.V.).]

 

 

THE author has told his readers that they have need of endurance;* but when he connects this endurance with faith, he describes faith, not as an enduring of present evils, but as an assurance of things hoped for in the future. His meaning undoubtedly is that assurance of the future gives strength to endure the present. These are two distinct aspects of faith. In the eleventh chapter both sides of faith are illustrated in the long catalogue of believers under the Old Testament. Examples of men waiting for the promise and having an assurance of things hoped for come first. They are Abel, Enoch,. Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph. In some measure these witnesses of God suffered; but the more prominent feature of their faith was expectation of a future blessing. Moses is next mentioned. He marks a transition. In him the two qualities of faith appear to strive for the pre-eminence. He chooses to be evil entreated with the [274] people of God, because he knows that the enjoyment of sin is short-lived; he suffers the reproach of Christ, and looks away from it to the recompense of reward. After him conflict and endurance are more prominent in the history of believers than assurance of the future. Many of these later heroes of faith had a more or less dim vision of the unseen; and in the case of those of whose faith nothing is said in the Old Testament except that they endured, the other phase of this spiritual power is not wanting. For the Church is one through the ages, and the clear eye of an earlier period cannot be disconnected from the strong arm of a later time.

 

* Heb.10: 36.

 

 

In the twelfth chapter the two aspects of faith exemplified in the saints of the Old Testament are urged on the Hebrew Christians. Now practically for the first time in the Epistle the writer addresses himself to the difficulties and discouragements of a state of conflict. In the earlier chapters he exhorted his readers to hold fast their own individual confession of Christ. In the later portions he exhorted them to quicken the faith of their brethren in the Church assemblies. But his account of the worthies of the Old Testament in the previous chapter has revealed a special adaptedness in faith to meet the actual condition of his readers. We gather froni the tenor of the passage that the Church had to contend against evil men. Who they [275] were we do not know. They were “the sinners.” Our author is claiming for the Christian Church the right to speak of the men outside in the language used by Jews concerning the heathen; and it is not at all unlikely that the unbelieving Jews themselves - [as well as disobedient and apostate Christians*] - are here meant. His readers had to endure the gainsaying of sinners, who poured contempt on Christianity, as they had also covered Christ Himself with shame. The Church might have to resist unto blood in striving against the encompassing sin. Peace is to be sought and followed after with all men, but not to the injury of that sanctification without which no man shall see the Lord.** The true people of God must go forth unto Jesus without the camp of Judaism, bearing His reproach.*

 

[* See Acts 20: 30; Col. 3: 6ff; 2 Thess. 1: 8ff.; cf. 2 Tim. 4: 1-4; 2 Pet. 2: 1; Jude 4, R.V.]  * Chapt. 12: 14.   ** Chapt. 13: 13.

 

 

This is an advance in the thought. Our author does not exhort his readers individually to steadfastness, nor the Church collectively to mutual oversight. He has before his eyes the conflict of the Church against wicked men, whether in sheep’s clothing or without the fold. The purport of the passage may be thus stated: Faith as a hope of the future is a faith to endure in the present conflict against men. The reverse of this is equally true and important: that faith as a strength to endure the gainsaying of men is the faith that [276] presses on toward the goal unto the ‘prize’ of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

 

 

The connecting link between these two representations of faith is to be found in the illustration with which the chapter opens. A race implies both a hope  - [ifaccounted worthy’ of the inheritance during the coming ‘age]* - and a contest.

 

[* See Luke 20: 35; Phil. 3: 11; cf. Heb. 11: 35b; Rev. 2: 10, 25; 3: 10, 11, 21; 14: 12; 20: 4, 5, R.V.).]

 

 

The hope of faith is simple and well understood. It has been made abundantly clear in the Epistle. It is to obtain the fulfilment of the promise made to Abraham and renewed to other [regenerate] believers time after time, under the old covenant. For we who believe do enter into God’s rest.”*They that have been called receive the promise of the eternal [Gk. ‘aionios] inheritance.”**We have boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus!”*** In the latter part of the chapter the writer speaks of his readers as having already attained. They have come to God, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, and to Jesus, the Mediator of the new covenant. In the first verse he urges them to run the race, so as to secure for themselves the blessing. He points them to Jesus, Who has run the race before them and won the crown, Who sits on the right hand of God, with authority to reward all who reach the goal. Both representations are perfectly consistent. Men do enter into immediate communion with God on earth; but they attain it by effort of faith.

 

* Chap. 4: 3.  ** Chap. 9: 15.   *** Chap. 10: 19.

 

[277]

Such is the aim, of faith. The conflict is more complex and difficult to explain. There is, first of all, a conflict in the preparatory training, and this is twofold. We have to strive against ourselves and against the world. We must put away our own grossness,* as athletes rid themselves by severe training of all superfluous flesh. Then we must also put away from us the sin that surrounds us, that quite besets us, on all sides,** whether in the world or in the Church, as runners must have the course cleared and the crowd of onlookers that press around removed far enough to give them the sense of breathing freely and running unimpeded in a large space. The word besetting does not refer to the special sin to which every individual is most prone. No thoughtful man but has felt himself encompassed by sin, not merely as a temptation, but much more as an overpowering force, silent, passive, closing in upon him on all sides, - a constant pressure from which there is no escape. The sin and misery of the world has staggered reason and left men utterly powerless to resist or to alleviate the infinite evil. Faith alone surmounts these preliminary difficulties of the Christian life. Faith delivers us from grossness of spirit, from lethargy, earthliness, stupor. Faith will also lift us above the terrible [278] pressure of the world’s sin. Faith has the heart that still hopes, and the hand that still saves. Faith resolutely puts away from her whatever threatens to overwhelm and impede, and makes for herself a large room to move freely in.

 

* 12: 1.    ** [See Greek …] 2: 10.

 

 

Then comes the actual contest. Our author says contest.”* For the conflict is against evil men. Yet it is, in a true and vital sense, not a contest of the kind which the word naturally suggests. Here the effort is not to be first at the goal. We run the race through endurance.” Mental suffering is of the essence of the conflict. Our success in winning the prize does not mean the failure of others. The failure of our rivals does not imply that we attain the mark. In fact, the Christian life is not the competition of rivals, but the enduring of shame at the hands of evil men, which endurance is a discipline. Maybe we do not sufficiently lay to heart that the discipline of life consists mainly in overcoming rightly and well the antagonism of men. The one bitterness in the life of our Lord Himself was the malice of the wicked. Apart from that unrelenting hatred we may regard His short life as serenely happy. The warning which He addressed to His disciples was that they should beware of men. But, though wisdom is necessary, the [279] conflict must not be shunned. When it is over, nothing will more astonish the man of faith than that he should have been afraid, so weak did malice prove to be.

 

* [See Greek…]

 

 

To run our course successfully, we must keep our eyes steadily fixed on Jesus.* It is true we are compassed about with a cloud of God’s faithful witnesses. But they are a cloud. The word signifies not merely that they are a large multitude, but also that we cannot distinguish individuals in the immense gathering of those who have gone before. The Church has always cherished a hope that the saints [angels]* of heaven are near us, perhaps seeing our efforts to follow their glorious example. Beyond this we dare not go. Personal communion is possible to the believer on earth with One only of the inhabitants of the spiritual world. That One is Jesus Christ. Even faith cannot discern the individual saints that compose the cloud. But it can look away from all of them to Jesus. It looks unto Jesus as He is and as He was: as He is for help; as He was for a perfect example.

 

Chapt. 12: 2.

 

[* NOTE: The words ‘the saints of heaven’ would suggest “… that the resurrection is past already” (2 Tim. 2: 18, R.V.)! ‘angels of heaven are near us’ is much better.]

 

 

1. Faith regards Jesus as He is,- the Leader and Perfecter.” The words are an allusion to what the writer has already told us in the Epistle concerning Jesus. He is the Captain or Leader of our salvation,”* [280] and by one offering He hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified!' ** He leads onward our faith till we attain the goal, and for every advance we make in the course He strengthens, sustains, and in the end completes our faith. The runner, when he seizes the crown, will not be found to have been exhausted by his efforts. High attainments demand a correspond­ingly great faith.

 

* Chapt. 2: 10. ** Chap. 10: 14. - [See Greek…]

 

 

Many expositors think the words which we have rendered Leader and Perfecter refer to Christ’s own faith. But the words will hardly admit of this meaning. Others think they are intended to convey the notion that Christ is the Author of our faith in its weak beginnings and the Finisher of it when it attains perfection. But the use which the Apostle has made of the words Leader of salvation in chap. 2. seems to prove that here also he understands by Leader One Who will bring our faith onward safely to the end of the course. The distinction is rather between rendering us certain of winning the crown and making our faith large and noble enough to be worthy of wearing it.

 

 

2. Faith regards Jesus as He was on earth, the perfect example of victory through endurance. He has acquired His power to lead onward and to make [281] perfect our faith by His own exercise of faith. He is Leader because He is Forerunner;” ** He is Perfecter because He Himself has been perfected.*** He endured a cross. The author leaves it to his readers to imagine all that is implied in the awful word. More is involved in the Cross than shame. For the shame of the Cross He could afford to despise. But there was in the Cross what He did not despise; yea, what drew tears and strong cries from Him in the agony of His soul. Concerning this, whatever it was, the author is here silent, because it was peculiar to Christ, and could never become an example to others, except indeed in the faith that enabled Him to endure it.

 

*Chap. 10: 14.   ** Chap. 6: 20.  *** Chap. 7: 28.

 

 

Even in the gainsaying of men there was an element which He did not despise, but endured. He understood that their gainsaying was against themselves.* It would end, not merely in putting Him to an open shame, but in their own destruction. This caused keen suffering to His holy and loving spirit. But He endured it, as He endured the Cross itself in all its mysterious import. He did not permit the sin and perdition of the world to overwhelm Him. His faith resolutely put away from Him the deadly pressure. On the one hand, He did not despise sin; on the other, He was not crushed by its weight. He calmly endured.

 

* Chap. 12: 3. - [Reading Greek …]

 

[282]

But He endured through faith, as an assurance of things hoped for and the proving of things not seen. He hoped to attain the joy which was set before Him as the prize to be won. The connection of the thought with the general subject of the whole passage satisfies us that the words translated for the joy set before Him are correctly so rendered, and do not mean that Christ chose the suffering and shame of the Cross in preference to the enjoyment of sin. This also is perfectly true, and more true of Christ than it was even of Moses. But the Apostle’s main idea throughout is that faith in the form of assurance and faith in the form of enduring go together. Jesus endured because He looked for a future joy as His recompense of reward; He attained the joy through His endurance.

 

 

But, as more than shame was involved in His Cross, more also than joy was reserved for Him in reward. Through His Cross He became the Leader and Perfecter of our faith. He was exalted to be the Sanctifier of His people. He has sat down on the right hand of God.”

 

 

Our author proceeds: Weigh this in the balance.* Compare this quality of faith with your own. Consider who He was and what you are. When you have well understood the difference, remember that He endured, 283 as you [are expected by Him to] endure, by faith. He put His trust in God.** He was faithful to Him Who had constituted Him what He became through His assumption of flesh and blood.*** He offered prayers and supplications to Him Who was able to save Him out of death, yet piously committed Himself to the hands of God. The gainsaying of men brought Him to the bloody death of the Cross. You also are marshalled in battle array, in the conflict against the sin of the world. But the Leader only has shed His blood - as yet. Your hour may be drawing nigh! Therefore be not weary in striving to reach the goal! Faint not in enduring the conflict! The two sides of faith are still in the Author’s thoughts.

 

* Chap. 12: 3.  **Chap. 2: 13.   *** Chap. 3: 2.

 

 

It would naturally occur to the readers of the Epistle to ask why they might not end their difficulties by shunning the conflict. Why might they not enter into fellowship with God without coming into conflict with men? But this cannot be. Communion with God requires personal fitness of character, and manifests itself in inward peace. This fitness, again, is the result of discipline, and the discipline implies endurance. It is for discipline that ye endure.”

 

* [See Greek…] (Chap. 12: 7, where the verb is indicative, not imperative).

 

 

The word translated discipline suggests the notion 284 of a child with his father. But it is noteworthy that the Apostle does not use the word children in his illustration, but the word sons.” This was occasioned partly by the fact that the citation from the Book of Proverbs speaks of sons.” But, in addition to this, the author’s mind seems to be still lingering with the remembrance of Him Who was Son of God [or God theonly begotten Son]. For discipline is the lot and privilege of all [who are] sons. Who is a son whom his father does not discipline? There might have been One. But even He humbled Himself to learn obedience through sufferings. Absolutely every son undergoes discipline.

 

 

Furthermore, the fathers of our bodies kept us under discipline, and we not only submitted, but even gave them reverence, though their discipline was not intended to have effect for more than the few days of our pupil-age, and though in that short time they were liable to error in their treatment of us. How much more shall we subject ourselves to the discipline of God! He is not only the God of all spirits and of all flesh,* but also the Father of our spirits; that is, He has created our spirit after His own likeness, and made it capable, through discipline, of partaking in His own holiness, which will be our true [inheritance* and] and everlasting life. The gardener breaks the hard ground, uproots weeds, lops [285] off branches; but the consequence of his rough treatment is that the fruit at last hangs on the bough. We are God’s tillage. Our conflict with men and their sin is watched and guided by a [heavenly, all-knowing, and loving] Father. The fruit consists in the calm after the storm, the peace of a good conscience, the silencing of accusers, the putting wicked men to shame, the reverence which righteousness extorts even from enemies. In the same book from which our author has cited far-reaching instruction, we are told that when a man’s ways please the Lord, He maketh even his enemies to be at peace with him.”**

 

* Num. 16: 22.   ** Prov. 16: 7.

 

[* See the chosen text on the photograph. Many Christians are today, not aware of the dangers of going down a dangerous road, which will lead them to the loss of the promised ‘inheritance’ and ‘prize’!] 

 

Here, again, the Apostle addresses his readers as members of the Church in its conflict with men. He tells them that, in doing what is incumbent upon them as a Church towards different classes of men, they secure for themselves individually the discipline of sons and may hope - [during “the age to come]* - to reap the fruit of that discipline in peace and righteousness. The Church has a duty to perform towards the weaker brethren, towards the enemy at the gate, and towards the Esaus whose worldliness imperils the purity of others.

 

[* See Heb. 6: 3-6, R.V.]

 

 

1. There were among them weaker brethren, the nerves of whose hands and knees were unstrung. They could neither combat a foe nor run the race. It was for 286 the Church to smooth the ruggedness of the road before its feet, that the lame things* (for so, with something of contempt, he names the waverers) might not be turned out of the course by the pressure of the other runners. Rather than permit this, let the Church lift up their drooping hands and sustain their palsied knees, that they may be healed of their lameness.

 

* Chapt. 12: 13. [See Greek …]

 

 

2. As to enemies and persecutors, it is the duty of the Church to follow after peace with all men, as much as in her lies. Christians may sacrifice almost anything for peace, but not their own priestly consecration, without which no man shall see the Lord Jesus at His appearing. He will be seen only by those who eagerly expect Him unto salvation.*

 

* Chapt. 9: 28.

 

 

3. The consecration of the Church is maintained by watchfulness* against every tendency to alienation from the grace of God, to bitterness against God and the brethren, to sensuality and profane worldliness. All must watch over themselves and over all the brethren. The danger, too, increases if it is neglected. It begins in withdrawing from the Church assemblies, where the influences of grace are manifested. It grows into the poisonous plant of a bitter spirit, which, like a root that beareth gall and wormwood,” spreads 287 through a family or tribe,”** and turns away their heart from the Lord to go and serve the gods of the nations. The many are defiled.” The Church as a whole becomes infected. But bitterness of spirit is not the only fruit of selfishness. On the same tree sensuality grows, which God will punish when the Church cannot detect its presence.***

 

* Chap. 12: 15. - [see Greek…].  ** Deut. 29: 28.  *** Chapt. 13: 4.

 

 

From the stem of selfishness, which will not brook the restraints of Church communion, springs, last and most dangerous of all, the profane, worldly spirit, which denies and mocks the very idea of consecration. It is the spirit of Esau, who bartered the right of the first-born to the promise of the covenant for one mess of pottage. The author calls attention to the incident, as it displays Esau’s contempt of the promise made to Abraham and his own father Isaac. His thoughts never rose above the [present] earth. What profit shall this birthright do to me?”* We must distinguish between the birthright - [belonging to first-born sons] - and the blessing. The former carried with it the great promise given to Abraham with an oath on Moriah: In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.”** Possession of it did not depend on Isaac’s fond blessing. It belonged to Esau by right of birth till he sold it to Jacob. But Isaac’s blessing, which he intended for Esau because he loved 288 him, meant more especially lordship over his brethren. Esau plainly distinguishes the two things: Is not he rightly named Jacob? For he hath supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright, and behold, now he hath taken away my blessing.”*** When he found that Jacob had supplanted him a second time, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and sought diligently, not the birthright, which was of a religious nature, but the dew of heaven, and the fatness of the earth, and plenty of corn and wine, and the homage of his mother’s sons. But he had sold the greater good and, by doing so, forfeited the lesser. The Apostle recognises, beyond the subtilty of Jacob and behind the blessing of Isaac, the Divine retribution. His selling the birthright was not the merely rash act of a sorely tempted youth. He continued to despise the covenant. When he was forty years old, he took wives of the daughters of the Canaanites. Abraham had made his servant swear that he would go to the city of Nahor to take a wife unto Isaac; and Rebekah, true to the instinct of faith, was weary of her life because of the daughters of Heth. But Esau cared for none of these things. The day on which Jacob took away the blessing marks the crisis in Esau’s life. He still despised the covenant and sought only worldly 289 lordship and plenty. For this profane scorn of the spiritual promise made to Abraham and Isaac, Esau not only lost the blessing which he sought, but was himself rejected. The Apostle reminds his readers that they know it to have been so from Esau’s subsequent history. They would not fail to see in him an example of the terrible doom described by the Apostle himself in a previous chapter. Esau was like the earth that brings forth thorns and thistles and is rejected.”**** The grace of repentance was denied him.+

 

* Gen. 25: 32.  ** Gen. 22: 18.   *** Gen. 27: 36.   **** Chapt. 6: 8.    + Chapt. 6: 6.

 

 

 

THE END