SELECTED FROM

‘THE DAWN MAGAZINE’

 

VOLUMES 4-6

 

 

-------

 

 

CONTENTS

 

 

1 THE LAW OF THE JUDGMENT SEAT + 4

 

 

2 THE TWO RESURRECTIONS + 4

 

 

3 THE WALK OF HOLINESS + 2

 

 

4 THE FIRST TRANSLATION + 2

 

 

5. THE PROPHET OF JUDGMENT + 2

 

 

6 THE REMOVAL OF THE CHURCH FROM EARTH + 3

 

 

7 A MOTHERS AMBITION FOR HER SONS + 2

 

 

8 THE REIGN OF CHRIST + 3

 

 

9 CHURCH DISCIPLINE BY

THE HOLY GHOST + 1

 

 

 * 10 APOSTOLICAL SUCCESSION + 1

 

 

11 THE LAYING ON OF HANDS

 

 

12 POWER LOST AND RECOVERED + 2

 

 

13 THE FIRST RESURRECTION + 2

 

 

 * 14 THE RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD + 3

 

 

15 THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

 

 

16 THE SONS OF GOD IN GENESIS SIX + 1

 

 

17 THE NEPHILIM + 1

 

 

18 THE SONS OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT + 2

 

 

19 THE NPHILIM AND THE FLOOD

 

 

20 YOUTH BEFORE THE ADVENT + 1

 

 

21 ANTICHRIST’S EMPIRE UNIVERSAL

 

 

22 THE KINGDOM LOST + 2

 

 

23 MANY CALLED BUT FEW CHOSEN + 1

 

 

24 THE SETTING OF THE JUDGMENT THRONE + 2

 

 

* 25 THE SERVANTS OF CHRIST AND

THEIR RESPONSIBILITY + 2

 

 

26 THE UNFORGIVEN BLASPHEMY + 2

 

 

27 THE JOY SET BEFORE HIM + 1

 

 

28 WARNING THE CHURCH OF GOD + 1

 

 

29 WORKING OUT OUR SALVATION + 1

 

 

30 COMING MIRACLE + 3

 

 

31 THE REBUILDING OF THE TEMPLE

 

 

32 JOHN THE IMMERCER NOT ELIJAH

 

 

33 THE TEMPLE OF EZEKIEL + 3

 

 

34 WAKING AND SLEEPING + 1

 

 

35 THE MASONIC CRAFT AND GOSPEL + 3

 

 

36 MOSES AND CHRIST + 1

 

 

37 THE CASE AGAINST THE SECOND ADVENT + 1

 

 

38 THE BEATIFIC VISION + 1

 

 

39 MILLENNARIANISM

 

 

* 40 THE DANGER OF AN EXASPERATED SPIRIT + 4

 

 

41 THE DEVOTION OF THE LORD JESUS

 

 

42 THE FIRST MAN IN HEAVEN +1

 

 

43 THE KINGDOM IN MYSTERY + 1

 

 

44 YOUTH BEFORE THE ADVENT + 3

 

 

45 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ATHIEST STATE

 

 

46 THE BEMA + 3

 

 

47 DYING CHURCHES + 1

 

 

* 48 A DIAGRAM OF THE AGES

 

 

49 THE SUFFERINGS OF CHRIST AND THE PRESENT HOUR

 

 

50 WHAT WE FIND IN CHRIST + 1

 

 

-------

 

 

1

 

THE LAW OF THE JUDGMENT SEAT + 4

 

 

As nothing is more certain than that all believers must stand before the Lord’s Judgment Seat, so nothing can surpass in importance the discovery of the principle on which that judgment will be conducted. It is the Judge Himself who, beyond all others, states and restates, enforces and reinforces the searching, satisfying, sublime law of the Judgment Seat. It is a principle divinely simple and sufficient. It is the quintessence of all law - “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth”; yet, since it is applied in a court embracing the holiest saints as well as the lowest graded of God’s servants, it is made to work as a general principle covering all conduct; and so while it carries exact retribution for wrong-doing, it equally and simultaneously carries an automatic recoil of glory. It is a fact past all conceivable wonder that we are the arbiters of our own judgment.

 

 

Now our Lord, “as He lifted up His eyes on His disciples” (Luke 6: 20) - for “the persons addressed,” as Dean Alford says, “are Christians, persons justified by faith, and waging the Christian conflict in the power of the Spirit”- in the heart of His counsels to the ‘little flock’ propounds the law of the Judgment Seat. He says:-“Judge not” - ‘do not act on the principle of justice, set not yourself up as a judge’ Godet) - “and” - as an automatic recoil- “ye shall not be judged” (Luke 6: 37) - the principle of justice will not be applied to you. That our Lord refers to the judgment of God and not the judgment of man is certain because whether we judge men or not, they will judge us; the most uncensorious of saints will not escape the censure of the world: our very refusal to condemn can make the uncharitable pronounce us hypocrites for speaking kindly of all.* “It cannot mean,” as Augustine says, “that if we judge rashly of others, God will judge rashly of us; or, if we measure unjustly to them, it will in turn be measured unjustly to us.” Nor is it mental discrimination which our Lord forbids: for immediately after (Matt. 7: 3) He explains how, rightly, we can analyse our brother’s faults, and how detect the human wolf masked as a child of God: what He forbids us is to invoke law, or to sentence as a judge sentences. So the Apostle James, defining it with inspired aptness as ‘the law of liberty,’ embodies the principle beyond misunderstanding:- “So speak ye, and so do, as men that are to be judged by the law of liberty. For judgment shall be without mercy” - that is, purely judicial and retributive - “to him that showed no mercy” - who acted, in all things, on justice: “mercy rejoiceth against judgment” (Jas. 2: 13).

 

*“It frequently happens that the children of God receive the very worst reward, and are oppressed by many unjust slanders; and that, too, when they have injured no man’s reputation, and even spared the faults of others” Calvin).

 

 

But now our Lord, to put the meaning beyond all doubt, splits up judgment into its two constituent elements of condemnation and acquittal, and once again reveals that the principle of action we adopt is the principle of action we shall experience. “Condemn not, and ye shall not he condemned” - not because you have no counts of condemnation, but because they are cancelled by your action: do not pass sentence, and sentence will not be passed on you: refrain from all that is judicial, and you will receive all that is merciful.* As God “is not reckoning unto the world their trespasses” (2 Cor. 5: 19), His patience is to be our pattern; His kindness our precedent; His forbearance our rule; and His love our law. And so shall we receive back. “Punishment is the recoil of crime, and the force of the backstroke is in proportion to the force of the original blow” - (Archbishop Trench).

 

* That the Epistles are woven of one web with the Gospels, is proved by identical doctrine. So Paul equally warns of appeal to law:- “Dare any of you go to law? Brother goeth to law with brother, and that before unbelievers: it is altogether a defect in you, that ye have lawsuits one with another” (1 Cor. 6: 1-7). Certain exceptions, however, Scripture states. In the Church, for certain sins (1 Cor. 5: 12); in business relations, which demand “that which is just” (Col. 4: 1); and in the rule of the home (1 Tim. 3: 4, 5), a measure of justice is permitted.

 

 

So then the Lord takes up the other half of the judicial function:- “release” - acquit, absolve, discharge: it is a legal term - “and ye shall be released The emphasis our Lord places on forgiveness can hardly be over-stated: in the heart of His model prayer He makes our forgiveness to turn exactly on the degree with which we forgive; and He commands us [His followers] to tell God that we accept and plead the principle.

 

 

“Forgive us our sins as” - like as, in the same manner as - “we forgive men their sins against us” (Luke 11: 4). Moreover alone of the seven petitions of the Prayer He singles it out, afterwards, for restatement and emphasis; and enforces it both positively and negatively, so as to make misunderstanding impossible - “giving one more blow to the die, so as to make the impression sharper and deeper” (Trench). “For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also” - will correspondingly- “forgive you; but if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses” (Matt. 6: 15).* It is obvious that the pardon, or non-pardon, must be after death, for only then does the opportunity for trespassing cease: that is, it is an adjudication at the [Lord’s] Judgment Seat; and our perfect pardon will turn upon our perfect pardoning. “Whensoever ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have aught against anyone; that your Father also which is in heaven may forgive you your trespasses” (Mark 11: 25).

 

* Apart from known sin, there may be sins once conscious and unrepented, but now forgotten; or dispensational sins (and the like) not admitted to be sins; or sins against the dead, whose forgiveness we cannot now obtain; and other such. “The remains of sin in us require the same forgiveness through grace that we received at first” (Stier). As the Church has seen all down the ages, this petition, put into the mouth of every child of the Father in Heaven, is fatal to any doctrine of sinlessness. “In many things we all stumble” (Jas. 3: 2); and some degree of mercy’s need the most exalted saint will carry to heaven’s gates.

 

 

But our Saviour, not content with these categorical commands, nor with embedding the principle in our most sacred Prayer, has crystallized it into one of His pregnant, exquisite Beatitudes. “Blessed are the merciful: for” - apart from all loveliness of character it may produce, or the scattering of mercy’s priceless boons: another fact altogether is the Lord’s ground of the beatitude - “they shall obtain mercy” (Matt. 5: 7); for “with the merciful Thou shalt show thyself merciful” (Psa. 18: 25). Mercy broke from every action of our Lord. He brought no charge against the Tempter; He wept for Jerusalem, the slaughter-house of Himself and His saints; He suffered the kiss of Judas; He won the heart of the reviler on the cross; He pleaded with God for His murderers; He forgave Peter. If it had not been for mercy, there would not be one disciple on earth, nor one glorified saint in heaven. Thus the law of the [coming] Judgment Seat bursts upon us here in all its glory. By the very letter of the Law - “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” - mercy creates mercy: the hand that looses its legal grip over a fellow-man, finds Christ’s legal grasp loosed over itself: its catalogue of evil offences vanishes, because, in the far-away earth-life, it cancelled a brother’s catalogue against itself. “The Lord grant unto him Paul prays for Onesiphorus, who had been most merciful to the Apostle, “to find mercy of the Lord in that day” (2 Tim. 1: 18).

 

 

Once more our Lord takes this harp of many strings but pouring one music, and strikes the fullest chord of all. “Give” - manifestly wealth, first of all; but also all else we have to give - “and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, shall they” - the judgment officers of the court above* - “give into your bosom” (Luke 6: 38). The Age to Come will show that the man who hoarded was the true spendthrift, and the ultimate bankrupt: on the other hand he who invests his all for Christ will find his worthless scrip, one day, fabulous. “In this world it is not what we take up, but what we give up, that makes us rich” (H. W. Beecher).

 

* “The plural [of the Greek word ...] they will give, corresponds to the French indef. Pron. On; it denotes the instruments of divine munificence, whoever they may be” (Godet): “such agents being indefinite, and the meaning thereby rendered solemn and emphatic; if we are to find a nominative, it should be the Angels, the ministers of the divine purpose” (Alford).

 

 

Finally, the Lord sums it all up in its essential principle. “With what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again” (Matt. 7: 2). Could anything be conceived more subtle, yet more simple? Anything more intensely practical? Anything more fearfully analytical of our own spirits? Anything more extraordinarily pregnant, if practised, with all the graces of the Christian character? The most merciful of us will need mercy, and the most forgiving will need pardon: therefore do to others, the Lord says, as you would that God should do to you; and reap exactly what you sow - love for love, mercy for mercy, or else justice for justice, vengeance for vengeance. In the words of Chrysostom:- “God makes thee arbiter of the judgment: as thou thyself judgest, He will judge thee

 

 

-------

 

 

MERCY

 

 

The quality of mercy is not strain’d;

It droppeth, as the gentle rain from heaven

Upon the place beneath: it was twice bless’d;

It blesseth him that gives, and him that takes:

’Tis mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes

The throned monarch better than his crown;

His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,

The attribute to awe and majesty,

Wherein doth sit the fear and dread of kings;

But mercy is above the sceptred sway,

It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,

It is an attribute to God Himself.

 

 

                                                                                               SHAKESPEARE

 

 

-------

 

 

THE FELLOWSHIP OF HIS SUFFERINGS

 

 

A share in Christ’s actual sufferings was impossible to Paul. But the sufferings of Christ were not ended - they are prolonged in His body, and of these the apostle desired to know the fellowship (Phil. 3: 10). He longed so to suffer, for such fellowship gave him assimilation to his Lord, as he drank of His cup, and was baptized with His baptism. It brought him into communion with Christ, purer, closer, and tenderer than simple service for Him could have achieved. It gave him such solace as Christ Himself enjoyed. To suffer together creates a dearer fellow-feeling than to labour together. Companionship in sorrow forms the most enduring of ties, - afflicted hearts cling to each other, grow into each other. The apostle yearned for this likeness to his Lord, assured that to suffer with Him, and that the depth of His sympathies could be fully known only to such as “through much tribulation” must enter the [Millennial] Kingdom. In all things Paul coveted conformity to his Lord - even in suffering and death. Assured that Christ’s career was the noblest which humanity had ever witnessed, or had ever passed through, he felt a strong desire to resemble Him - as well as when He suffered as when He laboured - as well as in His death as in His life. And the aspiration is closely connected with the promise: “if we suffer with Him we shall also reign with Him” (2 Tim. 2: 12). Such participation in Christ’s sufferings so identifies the sufferer with Him, that the power of His resurrection is necessarily experiences. Such conformity to His death secures conformity to His resurrection. - J. EADIE, D.D.

 

 

-------

 

 

HIS FELLOWSHIP

 

 

To-day, what speed: with Me, what company: in Paradise, what rest! - BOSSUET.

 

 

-------

 

 

REJECTION WITH CHRIST

 

 

Yet it was well, and Thou hast said in season,

‘As the Master shall the servant be’:

Let me not subtly slide into the treason,

Seeking an honour which they gave not Thee:

 

 

Nay, but much rather let me late returning

Bruised of my brethren, wounded from within,

Stoop with sad countenance and blushing burning,

Bitter with weariness and sick with sin, -

 

 

Straight to Thy presence get me and reveal it,

Nothing ashamed of tears upon Thy feet;

Sore and slow would and beg Thy hand to heal it,

Pour Thee the bitter, pray Thee for the sweet.

 

 

Then with a ripple of a radiance thro’ me

Rise and be manifest, O Morning Star!

Flow on my soul, thou Spirit, and renew me,

Fill with Thyself, and let the rest be far.

 

 

Give me a voice, a cry and a complaining, -

O let my sound be stormy in their ears!

Throat that would shout but cannot stay the straining,

Even that would weep but cannot wait for tears.

 

 

Surely He cometh, and a thousand voices

Call to the saints and to the deaf are dumb;

Surely He cometh, and the earth rejoices

Glad in His coming who hath sworn, I come.

 

 

Yea, thro’ life, death, thro’ sorrow and thro’ sinning

He shall suffice me, for He hath sufficed:

Christ is the end, for Christ was the beginning,

Christ the beginning, for the end is Christ.

 

 

                                                                                             F. W. H. MYERS.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

2

 

THE TWO RESURRECTIONS +4

 

 

By Lieut.Colonel G. F. POYNDER

 

 

John 5: 24-29

 

 

 

In this short passage the Lord Jesus Christ plainly showed the Jews of His day how those born in sin may be saved, and being saved, realize the importance of life, even life eternal; and then proceeds to enlighten them as regards the two resurrections. In considering this most important statement it may be divided into three parts:- 1. In verse 24 the Lord speaks of salvation from sin and the awful consequences of sin, freely granted to the true believer. 2. In verses 25-27 He tells them of the first resurrection, and the reason why He as Son of God has power to give life to the dead; and, as Son of man, to execute judgment on all. 3. In verses 28, 29 He speaks of the second or general resurrection, and of those who shall arise at that time.

 

 

1. verse 24. Doubtless all who study this verse will agree that our Lord is here referring only to those who are spiritually dead in trespasses and sins, who, when they hear His Word with an attentive ear, and believe on God the Father, will not come into condemnation, or the judgment of the Great White Throne, because their names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life, and they have passed out of the death of unbelief into the life of faith, even life eternal. This must of necessity refer to the spiritually dead, and only to these, seeing it would be impossible for those physically dead to hear His words from the lips of mortal men.

 

 

2. But with verse 25, we have a fresh paragraph, emphasized by the Lord’s strong introductory words:- “Verily, verily, I say unto you dealing with the First Resurrection only, and which, He shows clearly, is not universal, but limited to those who shall hear the Voice (not the words in some book,) but “the Voice of the Son of God.” “Verily, Verily, I say unto you, the hour (or the time, Gk.*) is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the Voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live Here there is no reason for spiritualizing the words of the Lord. They can be taken literally, and should, therefore, be so taken, even as any ordinary statement. The physically dead bodies that shall hear His Voice shall live, and presumably the dead bodies that do not hear His Voice shall not live at that time. The ‘now is’ gives us the clue to a right interpretation of the verse. ‘Now is’ clearly shows that the time referred to was not only in the future, but had already begun, when the Lord was upon earth. Hence, we read Jairus’s little daughter, the young man of Nain, and Lazarus, were all restored to life by the Voice of the Son of God, and also the company of “the saints which slept” arose when they heard His Voice give that loud cry on the Cross. In like manner, at the first resurrection, when the Lord comes, into the air “with a shout, with the Voice of the Archangel then “the dead in Christ” as well as those who were lulled to rest through (the agency, Glc.) of Jesus, as well as the living that hear His Voice, will arise to meet Him in the air,** and “in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump ... the dead” (that hear His Voice, and presumably only these,) “shall be raised incorruptible, and we” (i.e. those who love, + and are ‘looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the Great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ’ ++ shall be changed*.

 

 

* The time: as in 1 John 2: 18; Rev. 14: 15. ** 1 Thess. 4: 13-18; + 2 Tim. 4: 8. ++ Titus 2: 13; and 2 Tim. 4: 8; * 1 Cor. 15: 52; Phil. 3: 11 and 14. Gk.

 

 

This was the prize, “the out-resurrection from amongst the dead for which the Apostle Paul was striving, lest when He had preached to others, he himself should be a castaway, i.e. rejected at the judgment seat of Christ for the prize; and calling upon us to do the same, he writes, “Become imitators of me, even as I (am) of Christ* For “I subject my body to hardship, and treat it as a slave, lest having preached to others I myself may become disqualified (after trial).”** This also was the prize for which the martyrs suffered themselves to be tortured, “not accepting deliverance that they might obtain a better resurrection*** that is, the first resurrection, and hear His Voice when He comes to call the dead.

* 1 Cor. 11: 1, Gk.; ** 1 Cor. 9: 27, Gk. *** Heb. 11: 35.

 

 

How important it is then for us to examine ourselves, and see whether we be in the faith; and if we find ourselves lacking in any way, from the high ideal set before us by the Apostles and Martyrs - an ideal to which the Apostle Paul knew he had attained when he wrote his last epistle to Timothy* - may we confess our sins, and truly repent of our short-sighted folly, pleading earnestly for grace to help in our time of need; so running the race set before us, looking unto Jesus, the Author and Finisher of our faith, that when “He shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be shamed from Him in His presence”**; but may be permitted to stand before His judgment Seat + when He comes. And may we ever bear in mind the solemn warning contained in the judgment meted out to the wicked and unprofitable servant - His own bond-slave, entrusted with his Master’s goods, and which had been more or less carefully preserved - “Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest ... thou oughtest therefore ... take the talent from him ... and cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth++

 

* Tim. 4: 7, 8. ** 1 John 2: 28. The Bema. ++ Matt. 25: 30.

 

 

Is this one, then, amongst those who are condemned before the Great White Throne and cast into the Lake that burneth with fire and brimstone, the Second Death? We are not told that he is, but rather we may conclude that as he is his Lord’s own bondslave, bought with His Own most precious Blood, entrusted with His goods, his name was entered in the Lamb’s Book of Life; and, just as the prodigal son who wasted his loving Father’s goods in the far country was reinstated in the old Home; as the incestuous saint at Corinth was forgiven, though his body was handed over to “Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the Spirit* may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus”*; and again, as every man’s work shall be tried by fire, and only that which can pass uninjured through the flame be of any value - the wood, the hay, and the stubble, being all consumed, even though it had been built on the right foundation, but the man “himself ... saved yet so as through fire”: so, surely. We may reckon this wicked and slothful bondslave, (if his name has not been blotted out of the Book of Life**) will be raised up “at the last day” as a believer, and enter into life eternal, though he will of necessity have missed reigning with Christ in the Millennial Kingdom, and in some way or other, we are not told how, during that time, he will have to suffer in the outer darkness, where there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, cast out of the Kingdom of the Heavens, which he may perhaps see, but will be unable to enter.+

 

[* NOTE: not “Spirit” but a human “spirit”, for the time and place it will be ‘saved’ is after the time of Death and after one’s Judgment in ‘Sheol’ / ‘Hades’. See Num. 14: 24; cf. 16: 30b and Heb. 9: 27, R.V.]

 

* 1 Cor. 5: 5.  1 Cor. 3: 15 (Gk.). ** Rev. 3: 5. + Comp. John 3: 3 and 5.

 

 

3. Strange as His words must have sounded to His hearers, the Lord had yet more wonderful things to tell them, so in verses 28-29, He immediately passes on to the account of the second or General Resurrection - “Marvel not at this He said, “for the hour (the time, Gk.) is coming in the which all that are in the graves (whether they wish to do so or not,) shall hear His Voice, and shall come forth; (at one and the same time, apparently) they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have practised evil (Gk.) unto the resurrection of damnation or judgment.” Then will be fulfilled the prophecy of Daniel (chap. 12: 2) “many* of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake (at one and the same time, apparently) some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt”; which the Pharisees acknowledged, affirming “there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust** Here then we have our Lord’s own statement concerning the second or General Resurrection for the good as well as the evil. The garnering of the wheat and the burning of the tares; the severing of the good fish from the bad when the net is drawn to land, which the Lord distinctly affirms shall be made by angels sent forth by the Son of man at the end of the Age, who “shall come forth and sever the wicked from among the just, and shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing, and gnashing of teeth***This separation and judgment must take place when the Great White Throne is set, and “the dead, small and great, stand before God ... and were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works”+; those whose names are not written in the Lamb’s Book of Life will be cast into the lake of fire; whilst those whose names are in that book, but were not judged to be worthy of the first resurrection, now enter into eternal life, so for them the Lord’s promise as recorded in John 6: 39, 40, 44, 54 four times repeated, will be literally fulfilled, they will have everlasting life, being raised up as promised “at the last day which He defines in John 12: 48 (that there shall be no mistake); as the day in which “the word that I have spoken shall judge him” that “rejecteth Me, and receiveth not My words But - let it never be forgotten, - he will miss the prize, the first or the better resurrection, the joy of entering the Marriage feast, and living and reigning with his Lord during the Millennium.

 

* Many not all as some will have arisen in the first resurrection. ** Acts 24: 15. *** Matt. 13: 49, 50. *** Rev. 20: 12.

 

 

In conclusion, let us notice how definitely Our Lord disposes of the idea which is, doubtless, causing much lukewarmness in the Laodicean Church, viz., that all believers, dead and living, will be translated to meet our Lord when He comes into the air, and so they will ever be with the Lord. Further in the passage we have been considering, He distinctly refutes the very erroneous idea that only the good are raised from their graves, and the wicked are annihilated after death. “Knowing, therefore, the terror of the Lord let us persuade and exhort one another so to watch and pray that we may be accounted worthy to stand before the Son of man when He comes, and render a good account of our stewardship that we may obtain the commendation, “Well done, good and faithful servant ... enter thou into the joy of thy Lord

 

 

-------

 

 

Absolutely tender!

Absolutely true!

Understanding all things,

Understanding you;

Infinitely loving,

Infinitely near­ -

This is God our Father:

What have we to fear?

 

                                                                                                        F. M. N.

 

 

-------

 

 

REVIVING TRUTH

 

 

Churches which sink into the Unitarianism as rapidly sink out of existence; for it is a most subtle proof of the divinity of our Faith that, when it ceases to be Christian, it ceases to be. Exactly the reverse occurs where the Scriptures of God are taught in revival power. In the city of Pyongyang, in Korea, with a population of 60,000, from one-tenth to one-sixth are Christian communicants; and 53%. Of the church members attend Bible Institutes for prolonged study of the Scriptures. No presentation of Christ as He is can fail to enthral.

 

 

For ah! the Master is so fair,

His smile so sweet to banish’d men,

That they who meet it unaware

Can never rest on earth again;

 

 

And they who see Him ris’n afar

At God’s right hand to welcome them,

Forgetful stand of house and land

Desiring fair Jerusalem.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE SECRET OF SUCCESS

 

 

Dr. Wilbur Chapman met General Booth and asked him what was the secret of his success. His reply is noteworthy. “I will tell you the secret,” said he. “God has had all there is of me. There have been many men with greater brains than I, and men with great opportunities; but from the day that I got the poor of London on my heart, and a vision of what Christ could do for them, I made up my mind that God should have all there was of William Booth. And if there is anything of power in my work it is because God has all the love of my heart, all the power of my will, and all the influence of my life.” Nor did he ever relax, until, after eighty, he sank into death.

 

 

Let no man think that sudden in a minute

All is accomplish’d and the work is done:

Tho’ with thy earliest dawn thou shouldst begin it,

Scarce is it ended with thy setting sun.

 

 

-------

 

 

RISING AGAIN

 

 

Resurrection (as the word implies) is no substitution of another body for the corpse; but  the ‘rising again’ of what was buried. Dr. E. W. Bullinger, who denied eternal punishment, still more gravely denies that anything ever comes up out of the coffin: he assumes an annihilated body between death and the hereafter; in the case of the saved only, he asserts the reception at the resurrection of a body which is an entirely fresh creation; and this theory he embodied in his Companion Bible, which is spreading the error far and wide. Since a seed dies, says the Companion Bible, every germ, every substance in the old body, dies also, “and therefore it cannot be quickened.” The farmer would be very astonished, and quickly bankrupt, whose seeds, in this sense, ‘died.’ Our Lord’s body, He says Himself (John 12: 24), so died; but the same body reappeared, for death is dissolution, never annihilation.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

3

 

THE WALK OF HOLINESS + 2

 

 

By JOHN GIBBON, B.D.

 

 

-------

 

 

RULE I

 

 

Before the paroxysm cometh, prepare and antidote thy soul against the lusts of the flesh, by observing these advices : 1. That notable counsel of Eliphaz to Job: “acquaint now thyself with God, and be at peace” (Job 22: 21). 2. Stir up spiritual and holy lustings in thy soul after the love and favour, the grace and image, of thy God; and thou shalt not fulfil the lustings of the flesh.

 

 

RULE II

 

 

Study thoroughly the unchangeable natures, the eternal laws and differences, of moral good and evil. The sum of this rule then is: Deeply possess and dye thy soul all over with the representation of that everlasting beauty and amiableness that are in holiness, and of that horror, and ugliness, and deformity that eternally dwell on the forehead of all iniquity. Be under the awe and majesty of such clear convictions all day long, and “thou shalt not fulfil the lusts of the flesh

 

 

RULE III

 

 

Understand thyself, be no stranger to thy own breast know the frame, and temper, and constitution of thy mind. See what grace is principally wanting in thee, which is weakest, in what instances thy greatest failure betrays itself, in which of thy passions and affections thou art most peccable, and what lustings of the flesh they are which give thee the frequentest alarms, and threaten the greatest dangers.

 

 

RULE IV

 

 

Get and keep a tender conscience. Be sensible of the least sin. The most tender-hearted Christian - he is the stoutest and most valiant Christian. “Happy is the man that feareth always but he that hardeneth his heart, shall fall into mischief

 

 

RULE V

 

 

Keep an exact guard upon thy heart (Prov. 4: 23). Let the eyes of thy soul be open and awake, upon all the stirrings of thy thoughts and affections.

 

 

RULE VI

 

 

Be daily training and exercising all thy graces. Have them always in battle-array.

 

 

RULE VII

 

 

Be well skilled in the clenches of temptation. I mean, unmasking the sophistry and mystery of iniquity, in defeating the wiles and stratagems of the tempter, and in detecting and frustrating the cheats and finesses of the flesh with its deceitful lusts (Eph. 4: 22; 2 Cor. 2: 11). No small part of spiritual wisdom lies in the blessed art of discovering and refuting sins, fallacies and impostures.

 

 

RULE VIII

 

 

Withdraw thyself, if possible, from the occasions of sin, Be thou as the deaf adder to that great charmer: the best entertainment thou canst give him is, “Get thee behind me, Satan

 

 

RULE IX

 

 

Bind thyself beforehand with the severest of thy resolutions, not to trust thy judgment, when the temptation begins to get within thee. “A man in passion is not himself

 

 

RULE X

 

 

Awe them with the authority of thy reason and understanding. It is infinitely unbeseeming a man, that his lower should grow mutinous and untractable, that “the inferior and brutish faculties of our soul” should rebel against “the sovereign faculty of reason.” How soon doth the presence of a grave magistrate allay a popular tumult, if he comes in soon enough, in the beginning of the riot God hath made reason the magistrate of the little world He hath given it a commission to keep the peace in our souls.

 

 

RULE XI

 

 

If thy distempered affections and lusts slight the authority of thy reason, as thou art a man; bid thy conscience do its office, as thou art a Christian. Try to awe them with God’s written Word. Bring out of the register of conscience, the laws of Him that made thee; oppose some clear text of Holy Writ, that comes into thy mind against that very lust that is now rising.

 

 

RULE XII

 

 

If all this effect nothing, then draw the curtain, take off the veil from before thy heart, and let it behold the God that searcheth it (Jer. 17: 10; Heb. 4: 13). Show it the majesty of the Lord; see how that is described (Isa. 6: 1-3).

 

 

RULE XIII

 

 

If these great real arguments be slighted, try whether an argument, ad hominem, drawn from sense, will prevail. Awe thy lusts with the bitterness of thine own experience. Consider how often thou hast rued their disorders; what dismal consequences have followed upon their transports, and how dearly thou hast paid heretofore for thy connivance at them.

 

 

RULE XIV

 

 

Labour to cure thy lustings and affections in the first beginning of their disorders, by revulsion, by drawing the stream and tide another way. As physicians used to stop an haemorrhage, or bleeding at the nose, by breathing the esurrec vein in the arm, or opening the saphaena in the foot; so may we check our carnal affections, by turning them into spiritual ones: and these either - 1. Of the same nature. For example: catch thy worldly sorrow at the rise, and turn thy mourning into godly sorrow. If thou must needs weep, weep for something that deserves it. 2. Turn thy carnal affections into spiritual ones of a contrary nature. For example: allay thy worldly sorrow by spiritual joy. Try whether there be not enough in all-sufficiency itself to compensate the loss of any outward enjoyment; whether there will be any great miss or want of a broken cistern, when thou art at the fountainhead of living waters; whether the light of the sun cannot make amends for the expiring of a candle. Chastise thy carnal fears by hope in God. Set on work the grace contrary to the lust that is stirring; if it be pride and vain-glory in the applause of men, think how ridiculous it were for a criminal to please himself in the esteem and honour his fellow-prisoners render him, forgetting how guilty he is before his judge. If thou beginnest to be poured loosely out, and as it were dissolved in frolic, mirth, and joviality, correct that vainness and gaiety of spirit by the grave and sober thoughts of death and judgment and eternity.

 

 

RULE XV

 

 

If this avail not, fall instantly to prayer.

 

 

RULE XVI

 

 

When thou hast done this, rise up, and buckle on the shield of faith (Eph. 6: 16.). Go forth in the name and strength of the Lord, to do battle with thy lusts. Conclusion: Let me now persuade the practice of these holy rules. Let us resolve, in the strength of Christ, to resist these lustings of the flesh. Let me press this with a few considerations. 1. The more thou yieldest, the more thou mayest. Sin is insatiable; it will never say “enough”. 2. It is the quarrel of the Lord of hosts in which thou fightest. A cowardly soldier is the reproach of his commanders. Thou hast a noble General, O Christian, that hath done and finished perfectly whatever concerns thy redemption from the powers of darkness. 3. The lusts of the flesh are thy greatest enemies, as well as God’s. “They war against thy soul” (1 Pet. 2: 11). To resist them feebly, is to do not only the work of the Lord, but of thy soul, negligently. 4. It is easy vanquishing at first in comparison. A fire newly kindled is soon quenched, and a young thorn or bramble easily pulled up. 5. If thou resist, the victory is thine (James 4: 7). Temptation puts on its strength, as the will is; cease but to love the sin, and the temptation is answered. 6. Consider what thou doest. If thou fulfillest the lusts of the flesh, thou provokest thy heavenly Father. Is this thy love and thanks to thy Lord, to whom thou art so infinitely beholden? Canst thou find in thy heart to put thy spear again in His side? Hath He not suffered yet enough? Is His bloody passion nothing? Must He bleed again? Ah, monster of ingratitude! Ah, perfidious traitor as thou art, thus to requite thy Master! Again, thou grievest thy Comforter; and is that wisely done? Who shall comfort thee, if He depart?

 

 

-------

 

 

HE WENT AWAY SORROWFUL

 

 

A life so lonely, meek, and bare!

I wonder why He made a prayer

For them that mock’d and nail’d Him there!

 

 

Vast wealth is mine; why do I see

My golden hoard without avail?

Why turns no man with love to me?

Why did He triumph, and I fail?

 

 

Poor - and despised! How strange a thing

That mighty hosts, with worshipping

In endless praise, His name should sing!

 

 

Oh, ’tis a grievous mystery -

That mankind never looks to me

As to that spent and broken Christ

That droop’d on Calvary!

 

 

The Catholic World.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE JUDGMENT SEAT

 

 

The single eye is an eye fastened on the Judgment Seat of Christ.

 

                                                                                         ROBERT CHAPMAN.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

4

 

THE FIRST TRANSLATION + 2

 

 

By the Author of The Protoplast

 

 

 

As you have often seen a man move through a crowd abstracted and thoughtful, only concerned to make his way to his destination, so Enoch passed on to his eternal home, having little to do with earth, and much to do with heaven. He walked with God. There was no standing still with him, no settling upon the lees, no lying down in a spirit of slumber. There was steady, positive movement in the right direction. Every day and every hour brought him nearer to his final triumph. He did not walk alone towards heaven, but with God. He leant upon a strong arm; his might was the power of the Holy One. Step by step in his path was taken, as he was led forward by the Friend who loved him; his wisdom consisted in his distrust of himself, his child-like clinging to his Guide. These are the distinctive features of Enoch’s character. Such as he was in his day, shall be the men whom God will account worthy to escape the things which are coming upon the earth, and to stand before the Son of man.

 

 

Again, like Enoch, they will be intimate with God; as they will need Him much, they will not be content with that scanty intercourse with Him, which now subsists between the liveliest Christians and their Lord; but every moment will be spent with Him; every speech will be preceded by an upward glance to Him who has promised to give words that shall be said before the adversary in that day; every movement from city to city will be undertaken in obedience to His directions; every event, as it occurs, will be made the subject ,of converse with the Ruler of Providence, and every tear that flows then shall be shed upon the bosom of the Beloved.

 

 

Enoch was the first who struck the solemn chords of the harp of prophecy; the first who was sent forth to prepare the way of the Lord. And mark, he spoke not of Him, as the Man of sorrows and acquainted with grief; as the Lamb dumb before His shearers: but as the Lion of the tribe of Judah; the Judge of all; the King of Righteousness. Almost all the other prophets tell of Christ in both these characters, and declare first His humiliation, and then His glory. Why is there this marked distinction between Enoch’s burden and that of his brethren, but that he stood forth in those early days as the prototype of the latter-day believers, whose unvarying testimony shall be:- “Fear God, and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment is come?” “Behold the Lord cometh said Enoch. How remarkable is that present tense of the verb! Though thousands of years were to intervene between the hour in which he spoke, and that of Christ’s appearing.

 

 

How very ancient is the doctrine of the millennial advent! Men have called it a new thing, a Utopian theory. Enoch, the seventh from Adam, preached it - the young world needed it - the lately fallen human race required the warning that Christ would judge them; and is it to be withheld from men who are just filling up the measure of iniquity, and putting the last seals to the blasphemy which has gone up unto the heavens? Are we not ashamed to think how we have slumbered over a truth which was so precious to the fathers of that faith which is now delivered unto us as saints? Just because God’s servants have ever used the present tense in speaking of the Lord’s appearing, men have obstinately closed their ears and refused to give credence to their testimony. “You tell us that ‘the Lord cometh,’” they say, “but He does not come How long shall we listen to the cry? The Anabaptists said, He cometh - they went forth into the fields to wait for Him; the Irvingites said, He cometh - they fixed the hour when they should see Him; but He is not here. Where is the promise of His coming? Since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were.” This is the language of the Infidel, and, alas, it is the language of many a Christian. Enoch said, Behold, He cometh. The child of God says to-day - He cometh. Yea, He cometh quickly. The tense is present, not future, and if the worn-out, rotten world lasts out another hundred years, the cry will still be - He cometh.

 

 

I pray you also to notice in this speech, or discourse of Enoch, the glory of the righteous is not spoken of, but the judgment of the rebellious. We often hear it said, “Preach Christ in His loveliness, His compassion, His grace, His fulness; hold Him up to men as a Saviour, and the ungodly will be far more likely to turn to Him, than by representing Him in His character as the stern Judge, who shall rule them ‘with a rod of iron, and break them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.’” Enoch’s voice proclaims judgment, he does not even dwell upon the joy and blessedness, which the day of Jesus would bring to the Bridegroom’s ‘friends’; but his soul is stirred within him, at the thought of that wine-press treading, wherein the enemies of the Lord shall at length be crushed, and he is ready to sing ‘Alleluia’! Enoch was a stern prophet, he had nothing to do with smooth things, his eye and his heart were fixed upon his precious Master’s visible triumph over all His foes.

 

 

Now, recollect, that in Enoch’s ministry, we have the pattern of that message which shall be spoken by the last generation of the just. In the midst of the great affliction, men of Enoch’s character will look up unto heaven and say:- Behold, the Lord cometh! In all ages of the Church, certain truths have been peculiarly prominent at different times. Just as justification by Christ’s righteousness alone, was especially preached in the days of Luther, and God’s sovereignty in the days of Romaine and Toplady; just as the glory of the Law has been brought forward in the revivals of ’59 and ’60, with unusual distinctness; so shall the doctrine of the Lord’s coming and Kingdom take the first place in all preaching, as we draw near the time of the end. So urgent will seem the need of Christ, and so intense the desire for Him, in those days of the world’s utmost darkness, that every subject will appear of minor importance compared to that which treats of millennial glory, and millennial judgment. Behold, He cometh! How beautiful is the thought, that the last act of Christ’s Militant Church on earth will be to wait for their brethren. Even although they long to gather around their approaching Saviour, they will pause at the threshold of their happiness, and tarry for the perfection of the beloved sleepers in the dust of earth. Then shall the risen and the changed ascend together to meet Him from whom all their future blessedness shall be derived.

 

 

Meanwhile, let your mission resemble that of Enoch. Think of the responsibility of God’s last witnesses - [to an apostate Church] - in a fallen world. You will have to bear your part in a mightier struggle than has ever yet been known between God’s army and Satan’s. In a peculiar manner, you will have to wrestle against principalities, against powers. Fear not to prophesy that Christ cometh quickly, while the world proclaims, “There is no GodFear not to stand by the altars of Baal, and appeal to the fiery answer of the day of the Lord. Fear not to tell of the judgment, and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. When the thrones of earth are swept away and the kingdoms of men crumble into dust, look up to heaven and see Jesus at the right-hand of God. To Him whose right is, shall the dominion be shortly given. Possess your souls in patience. WATCH but WAIT.

 

 

-------

 

 

ANGLO-CATHOLIC HONOUR

 

 

Incalculably the most painful element never absent from all ‘Catholic’ controversy, and a very startling proof of the Babylonish origin of the leaven (Matt. 13: 33), is the contaminated fountain of Catholic honour. “The serious subject of the clerical conscience,” says Sir Flinders Petrie, in a letter to the Times (Dec. 13th, 1927), “must be noticed. The disturbing changes in the revised Prayer Book are obviously made to gratify those who do not scruple to reverse the terms on which they were ordained. We hear clergy talking of celebrating Low Mass and High Mass, and boasts to the English Church Union of the use of the Latin service of the Mass, so obscured as to hide the deception. Yet the English Church calls these services ‘blasphemous fables.’ If in any secular matter a man accepts the position and emoluments of an office, the national conscience expects him to deal honestly, and not to glory in breaking his engagements. Is the clerical conscience less exact? Is this the wholesome example and pattern which was vowed at ordination? A conscience that keeps a position while defying its obligations is a national danger, especially when those who follow it claim to educate the conscience through the Confessional.” The slippery grasp of the Sacerdotal mind, greased by casuistry, on truth and honour is one of the utterly mournful things of history. As Dean Burgon wrote from Rome: “Truth has been so systematically disregarded here that it has come at last to be, in a manner, not understood

 

 

-------

 

 

THE CROSS AND THE CROWN

 

 

Christ has many lovers of His Kingdom, but few carriers of his cross. - Thomas a Kempis.

 

 

Many crowd the Saviour’s Kingdom,

Few receive His Cross;

Many seek His consolations,

Few will suffer loss,

For the dear sake of the Master

Counting all but dross.

 

 

Many sit at Jesus’ table,

Few will fast with Him

When the sorrow-cup of anguish

Trembles to the brim:

Few watch with Him in the garden

Who have sung the hymn.

 

 

Many will confess His wisdom,

Few embrace His shame;

Many, while He smiles upon them,

Loud His praise proclaim -

Then if for a while He tries them

They desert His Name.

 

 

But the souls who love supremely,

Let woe come or bliss,

These will count their dearest heart’s blood

Not their own, but His:

Saviour, Thou Who thus hast loved me,

Give me love like this.

 

 

                                                                                                           - The Overcomer.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

5

 

THE PROPHET OF JUDGMENT + 2

 

 

 

Elijah is incomparably the most wonderful of the prophets of Jehovah. He is referred to more often and more directly than any other prophet in the New Testament; and when the Lord on the Mount summons to Himself the Law and the Prophets, while Moses stands for the Law, it is Elijah who embodies the Prophets. His appearances and disappearances are extraordinarily dramatic. He appears from nowhere, suddenly, in full maturity as man and as prophet, without a single recorded word on his past: he disappears into nowhere - an abode which to this moment remains one of the secrets of God - in a whirlwind. He is the prophet of action, brief, summary, compelling: far the most miracle-gifted of all the ancient prophets, his miracles are greater even than those of Moses - for where Moses sterilized a Nile, Elijah locked the heavens, and while Moses slew the firstborn, Elijah raised him. He was the first of the human race to wake the dead.

 

 

Elijah was a flaming prophet of judgment; and the nearer we approach the end, the more valuable he will become as a beacon-light and a model. His appearance in the Northern Kingdom was at a moment, not only of the deepest corruption, but of nation-wide apostasy, and on the eve of Israel’s extermination as a kingdom. No greater crisis in Israel has ever been: the greatest prophet is reserved for the worst age. Thus every word of Elijah - remarkably few are recorded - was a battle. But while no other prophet (except Moses) has wrought such judgment miracles, either in number or in power, in the heart of them is a call of mercy. Three times he calls down fire from heaven, twice consuming whole platoons of soldiers (2 Kings 1: 10), and withers earth by locking heaven for three and a half years: nevertheless two of his greatest miracles - multiplying meal and oil for two years, and the raising of the dead - were wrought for one solitary heathen widow; and if he brought the drought, it is he who brought the rain. Elijah is a lightning-flash on the rocks that the wreck, blind in the darkness, may see the doom on which she is driving.

 

 

For the Holy Ghost three times in the New Testament punctuates the life of Elijah as advents of mercy: ‘the  Tishbite’ means ‘the converter’: and so our Lord reveals him as a missionary into the heathen dark. Jesus says:-“Of a truth I say unto you, There were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah; and unto none of them was Elijah sent, but only to Zarephath, unto a woman that was a widow” (Luke 4: 25). Elijah is a designed embodiment of God’s power in the midnight of the world: in an atheistic and idolatrous crisis when God’s physical re-assertion of Himself is (in grace) desperately needed, miracles are abundantly granted:-miracle over the animal creation - the feeding by ravens; miracle over food - the multiplied meal and oil; miracle over the body - a forty days’ fast; miracle over earth - the parted Jordan; miracle over the heavens - the rain withheld; miracle over the other world - the raising of the dead; and even miracle of annihilation - the fire-consumed stones on Carmel. But the spiritual kernel in it all is unhusked by our Lord. In the desolation of nations God does not forget a widow gathering sticks. Elijah sent to Sarepta is an embodiment of the sovereign election of God, sent out into earth’s uttermost darkness to find the Redeemer’s jewels. There is always a Widow of Sarepta in the heart of Jezebel’s land.

 

 

The next selection in the life of Elijah made by the Holy Ghost is a moment of fearful depression and wonderful revelation. “What saith the answer of God unto him”? “I have left for myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to Baal” (Rom. 11: 4). Elijah, in a loneliness in no way altered by the existence of the invisible thousands, without any human protection, companionship, or even sympathy - for he does not appear to have known of the Jehovah worshippers - confronts two savage tyrants, eight hundred and fifty demoniac prophets, and an entire nation acquiescing in State-established idolatry - the most dangerous of all things to oppose. Single-handed he killed Baal-worship at a blow. But again the Holy Ghost reveals God’s heart of mercy in judgment. When despair is clutching at the prophet’s throat, and he is certain the apostasy is universal, God - doing an altogether unique thing - turns the finished side of the tapestry up, and, by unveiling omniscience in a divine census, not only shows His work to be seven thousand times greater than Elijah knew, but that He is working to an exact pattern. Not one soul will be missing from the roll of the elect.

 

 

Lastly the Holy Ghost, in selecting, out of all the Old Testament heroes, Elijah as the model of prayer, reveals his intercession as mainly mercy. “Elijah was a man of like passions with us, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain” - a remarkable proof that the gifts of even the most powerful miracle-workers cannot be divorced from prayer, and that Deity alone (as our Lord before raising the dead) is exempt from petition before the mightiest wonders - “and he prayed again, and the heaven gave rain” (Jas. 5: 17). Elijah’s praying was judgment in order to mercy: first the drought, then the showers: “he prayed again, and the earth brought forth her fruit We are told that he ‘prayed fervently’ for the drought, but we are told that he prayed seven times (1 Kings 18: 43) for the rain. Is it not a gigantic parable that it is Elijah’s prayer, when he comes again, - [before our Lord returns] - which will call down the Latter Rain? * As Elijah came in the person of John between Law and Grace, so he will come again in his own person between Grace and Law; and both dawns have in them the light of both sunsets: in each case Elijah is a gigantic twilight figure.

 

* It is suggestive that Elijah obtained the promise of the showers before, but the showers themselves after, the struggle on Carmel; and in spite of the promise, they required a sevenfold prayer.

 

 

Three tremendous closing episodes in this tremendous life are each introduced with ‘Behold,’ so marking the great emphasis God puts upon them. “BEHOLD, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire and Elijah went up by a whirlwind” - in an ascent, in law not grace, startlingly unlike the calm ascent of our Lord - “into heaven” (2 Kings 2: 11). Whither he went, the present abode of Enoch and Elijah, is utterly unrevealed: it is not Hades, for they ascended; it is not ‘the heaven of heavens for “no man” - our Lord states - “hath ascended into heaven” (John 3: 13), and He Himself has alone “passed through the heavens” (Heb. 4: 14): probably it is the third heaven - counting from the Throne, and so the lowest - to which Paul was caught away, and where it is possible that converse with Enoch and Elijah was among the things not lawful to utter (2 Cor. 12: 4).*

 

* It is remarkable that they are nowhere said to have been taken to Paradise, which can only be accounted for on the ground that Paradise - to which Paul, in manifestly a parallel and separate experience, was ‘caught away’ (there is no ‘up’ in the Greek) - is a department of Hades, to which our Lord descended (Luke 23: 43), in “the lower parts of the earth” (Eph. 4: 9). This locality of Paradise our Lord Himself makes certain, for after three days in it He says to Mary - “I am not yet ascended” (John 20: 17.); for, as He had Himself foretold, He had been “three days and three nights in the heart of the earth”(Matt. 12: 40.).

 

 

Deathless removal from earth vindicates the servant of God: establishes, by physical proof, worlds beyond; reveals God as Lord of Death, which He holds in abeyance at His will; breaches the dam of judgment by uplifting its keystone - “My father, my father, the chariots of Israel and the horsemen thereof uncovers the sole pathway to the Bema; and (in the case of Enoch) gives the world for five thousand years a palpable proof of the ultimate removal of the Church down the far ages of time.

 

 

Elijah’s second appearance on earth gives the evangelical vital which is the soul of his life and the heart-content of all prophesy. “BEHOLD, there talked with him two men, which were Moses and Elijah, who appeared in glory, and spake of his decease” (Luke 9: 30): Moses, fifteen centuries old, and Elijah nearly a thousand years; both [appearing] in glory, bodily witnesses of a glory-world beyond.* The great drama of the ages was about to be enacted; and, on this elevated plateau of the world, Moses (as it were) says, “The Law was the Schoolmaster to bring us to Christ”; and Elijah, - “The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” For their central theme is disclosed. They do not tell Him of a grave God-dug, with mournful angels standing round; nor of a chariot and horses of fire, waiting: their converse is of a cross, and a crown of thorns; an altar, and a flame. The Law-giver ponders the most lawless act of all eternity; and the Prophet ponders the burial of all hope: yet in that lawlessness the Law-giver sees the Law finally accomplished; and in that tomb - into which he himself had never entered - the deathless Prophet sees the death of death.

 

* If Elijah is one of the two Witnesses slain by Antichrist (Rev. 11: 7 his martyrdom proves that a servant of God, once glorified, can die. Fixity, in glory after rapture, incorruptibility, is stated to be a special privilege by our Lord - “accounted worthy of the resurrection, they cannot die any more”(Luke 20: 35) ; and thus 1 Cor. 15. covers - [all resurrected and immortal] - Kingdom saints (verse 50) as incorruptible.

 

 

Probably at now no very distant date lies Elijah’s third appearance on earth, and his second descent to the earth. “BEHOLD, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and terrible day of the Lord come: and he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to the fathers” - turning the hearts of the alienated, apostate children to the hearts of their orthodox ancestors, as they leave the Talmud for the Scriptures, and turning the now rejoicing hearts of the patriarchs to the broken and contrite souls of repentant Israel - “lest” - for the heart of even Elijah’s second coming, as of the first, is still mercy - “I come and smite the earth with a curse” (Mal. 4: 5). The roots of all revelation are deep in the past, and to part with them is to part with God: so Elijah is - as our Lord alone asserts (Matt. 17: 2) - the Restorer,* both to Israel and the world; and so his 7,000 in Israel becomes 144,000 (Rev. 7: 1), and his heathen widow of Sarepta becomes the countless sheep on the right hand of the King.

 

* It is an apocryphal tradition (Eccl. 48: 10) that Elijah is to “restore the tribes of Jacob.” It has also been conjectured that, as ‘restorer’ is he who will reawaken the miraculous gifts of the Holy Ghost which have been dormant since the Apostolic age.

 

 

-------

 

 

1928

 

 

The bread that giveth strength I want to give;

The water pure that bids the thirsty live;

I want to help the fainting day by day,

Because I shall not pass again this way.

 

 

I want to give the oil of joy for tears;

The faith to conquer cruel doubts and fears

Beauty for ashes may I give I,

Because I shall not pass again this way.

 

 

I want to give good measure running o’er,

And into angry hearts I want to pour

The answer soft that turneth wrath away,

Because I shall not pass again this way.

 

 

I want to give to others hope and faith;

I want to do all that the Master saith

I want to live aright from day to day,

Because I shall not pass again this way.

 

 

-------

 

 

GET READY

 

 

I shall never forget one morning in a city where I was a pastor, that they brought a broken man on a stretcher, laid him on his bed, and sent for me. There were his wife and two daughters weeping and their faces strained with suspense. And the good old physician, whom I knew and loved, was standing by, he on one side of the bed and I on the other. And there was a hush of death almost upon us all. They laid him down, and the doctor quietly examined him. Then, seizing a moment when the eyes of wife and daughters were withdrawn, he looked at me and shook his head, and I knew there was no hope. Then it was my turn. I tenderly knelt down beside my friend and parishioner, and I said, “My dear fellow, is it all right? Can you trust Him?” He looked up with a smile, and said, “Oh, yes; I got ready for this ten years ago.” Then brokenly he managed to tell me how in a revival meeting one night the preacher said, “My friend, some day you may be carried home to your wife, unable to get ready in a hurry. Get ready to-night.” And he got ready.  - WILBUR CHAPMAN, D.D.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

6

 

THE REMOVAL OF THE CHURCH

FROM EARTH + 3

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

It is a most happy fact, solving a complex and warmly debated problem with case and finish, that, if a single phrase in the Apocalypse - wheat- is a symbol of the Church, a graded removal of the Church from earth, a removal in sections, passes out of the realm of discussion into that of certainty. This symbol is the Pass of Thermopylae which our good friends the opponents of selective rapture must lay down their lives rather than yield. For the Harvest and its reaping in the Apocalypse is a statement of fact: it is not an ambiguous reference; or a debatable doctrine; or an attempted synthesis of Scriptures; or even a statement of principle: it is a picture of what actually occurs; and therefore, if the Harvest is Christian, the narrative is a photograph, taken beforehand by God’s camera, of the - [‘accounted worthy to escape’ {Luke 21: 35; Rev. 3: 10} by those within the] - Church in the act of her removal from earth to heaven. If Wheat is a God-designed symbol of the Church of Christ, the many hearts- they must be a great host - who are sincerely desirous of the truth on a point which grows more fearfully urgent and practical with every passing hour, can be set at rest in a fundamental certainty.

 

 

FIRSTFRUITS

 

 

Now the first key-fact of the drama is that the scene opens in heaven, and that all the actors in it - the Lamb, the Firstfruits, the Angels - move in and from the heavenlies. The proofs of this are unmistakable. (1) Christ is in the heavenlies. “I saw, and behold, the Lamb standing” (Rev. 14: 1) the Lord does not descend to earth until the nineteenth chapter; and even later in this very chapter, when, as Reaper, He casts His sickle to the earth (verse 14), He is still seated on the Parousia-cloud in the heavenlies. The Lord’s title throughout His sojourn in the heavenlies is ‘The Lamb’: ‘the Son of Man’ is His title on descending to the earth. (2) ‘Jerusalem’ throughout the Apocalypse never means the earthly Jerusalem; and Mount Zion below, so far from being occupied by Christ - who does not descend upon it until after the Vintage pictured at the close of this chapter - is, at this moment, in the grip of the murderous Antichrist (Rev. 11: 8): the Mount Zion here named is, therefore, the “mount Zion, the heavenly Jerusalem” (Heb. 12: 22) to which we have already in spirit come. (3) The Firstfruit company sing “before the throne, and before the four living creatures and the elders” (14: 3): and the Throne of God is indisputably in heaven.* “‘Heaven,’ from which the sound comes (verse 2), includes the ‘Mount Zion’ of verse 1, on which the Lamb and His followers stand” (A. Plummer, D.D.). So whoever they are, and whatever they are, the Firstfruits are in heaven; and they are already on high when an Angel goes forth to warn earth of the approaching reign of Antichrist.

 

* “Jerusalem never designates in the Apocalypse the city commonly known by that name; and the earthly Zion had long ago lost its significance to the Seer of the Revelation. As certainly as ‘the voice from heaven’ in ver. 2 is the voice of the 144,000, so certainly must the Mount Zion, where the Lamb stands, be the heavenly one” (Hengstenberg).

 

 

THE HARVEST

 

 

Now the other key-fact in the drama is the inescapable identity of firstfruits with harvest. “If the firstfruit is holy Paul says, “so is the lump” (Rom. 11: 16) - the crop from which it is cut: that is, if the Firstfruits are a heavenly body, so also is the Harvest a heavenly body, although still on the surface of the earth. For it is impossible to deny that the Firstfruits and Harvest in this chapter each relate to the other, as the first-cut and the later-cut of one body of wheat: beyond the sharply numbered firstfruits stretches the unnumbered and innumerable harvest. Thus all is exactly square with all other Scriptures. For as the fig stands for Israel; the cedar, the bramble, etc., for Gentile nations (Judges 9: 14); the darnel (or tare) for the bastard Christian; and the Vine (in the Apocalypse) for Antichrist’s followers - so the wheat throughout Scripture is never the symbol of any group but the Church. The Lord Himself is the falling grain of wheat (John 12: 24): when the Apostles are sifted, they are sifted as wheat (Luke 22: 3l): when the Lord commands prayer for the missionaries of two thousand years, it is for the reaping of wheat (Luke 10: 2): when James counsels patience all down the Gospel ages, it is patience over wheat (Jas. 5: 7): when Paul pictures the breaking of Christian tombs, it is for the springing of wheat (1 Cor. 15: 37). The whole history of the Church is summed up in this symbol by our Lord:- “He that soweth the good seed is the Son of Man; the field is the world” - not Palestine; “the harvest is the end of the age” - the culmination, that is, of two thousand years of sowing, or the Church epoch; “and the reapers are angels” (Matt. 13: 37). The Harvest, as Dr. Swete says, is “the wheat-harvest considered apart from the tares which follow immediately in the Vintage;* or as John the Baptist put it:- “whose fan is in his hand, thoroughly to cleanse his threshing-floor” [Christendom] “and to gather the wheat into his garner, but the chaff he will burn up with unquenchable fire” (Luke 3: 17)

 

* “The Harvest is the ingathering of the Good, the ingathering of wheat into the heavenly barn: the Vintage is the crushing of the wicked” (Bishop Wordsworth). So Bengel:- “By means of the Harvest a great multitude of the righteous, and by means of the Vintage a great multitude of the ungodly, is removed from the world: the Vintage is expressive only of wrath, the Harvest is entirely of a gracious character

 

 

WHEAT

 

 

So then the sole obstacle to a divided reaping - namely, the theory that the Firstfruits are ‘Jewish’ - collapses. For no Jewish body is ever removed from the earth at all. Wheat is so characteristic of the Christian that it could not be a symbol of an earthly people: its fragile stalk, dying to earth as it ripens heavenward, so unlike the rooted, luscious grasp on earth of fig or vine; its annual relays moving off the field in successive pilgrim generations; its value as the supreme food for man, even as the Church is the supreme satisfaction of God; its lack of what, to the world, would be pleasant fruit - fig or grape: wheat is manifestly created to be God’s kindergarten of the Church; and the theory that this body of redeemed on high is ‘Jewish’, under investigation, melts as a mist in the sun, or a fog swept by a sea-wind.*

 

* How clear minds could ever have confounded the earthly First-fruits (Rev. 7: 4) with the heavenly Firstfruits is one of the mysteries of Apocalyptic interpretation. For it would be difficult to find two groups of the saved more radically distinguished by explicit statements of Scripture. The one group is on the earth, the other is in heaven: the one is named as Jews, the other is named as catholic: the one is drawn from the Twelve Tribes of Israel, the other “from among men” - mankind in general: the one escapes into the wilderness (Rev. 12: 14) the other into the heavenlies: the one is stationary in the desert, with Christ as the Jehovah Angel, the other moves freely everywhere, with the Lamb: the one is sealed in the forehead as a miraculous safeguard against assassination (Rev. 9: 4), the other is named in the forehead in a realm where assassination is impossible. The virginity of the Lamb’s body-escort is also profoundly un-Jewish; and redemption from the earth, as Israel’s from Egypt (1 Chron. 17: 21), indicates a physical removal. “That the Seer intended to represent this throng as composed exclusively of Jews is an utterly ridiculous assumption from beginning to end” (Lange); an assumption which probably arose from the mistake - a mistake based on the spurious ‘us’ of Rev. 5: 9 - which identifies the Church with the heads of the angelic hierarchy, the Elders, and so compels commentator after commentator to find in the Firstfruits (standing separately from the Elders) some body not the Church.

 

 

DIVIDED REAPING

 

 

Therefore the stupendous fact now confronts us - not an inference, nor a doctrine, but a photograph - that not all the Church is reaped into the heavenlies at one swing of the scythe. Between Firstfruits and Harvest yawns an ominous drama. Between the Firstfruits reaped on high, and the Harvest still uncut on earth, successive judgment Angels proclaim wrath on the threshold, the accomplished overthrow of Babylon, and the Mark of the Beast at the doors, followed by a dirge (or elegy) of the Spirit over a sudden burst of martyrdom - all events that are close to the opening hours of the Great Tribulation; and the Harvest is still uncut. The Firstfruits, garnered we are not told when, but earlier, are, as Dean Alford says, “choice ones among God’s people, and not the totality of those who shall form the great multitude that no man can number.” It is a significant fact that there has never yet been a rapture except of conspicuous saints. “Without question, there is pre-eminence in being the firstfruits of the heavenly harvest. They are not all the saved. The very word indicates that there is much more to follow. Nor are they the mass of the saved. Theirs is the ‘first resurrection,’ of which we read in chapter 20. - that resurrection of the dead which St. Paul calls ‘the resurrection,’ and ‘the mark’ toward which he pressed, if by any means he might attain unto it (Phil. 3.). Infinite mischief is done by the belief that all will be equally blessed, equally honoured” (Pulpit Commentary).*

 

* Our Lord is in their midst, and is also firstfruits (1 Cor. 15: 20) - thus proving that firstfruits are composed of dead, and not only of living, saints; and, as reaped two thousand years earlier, the Ascension divides the cutting even of first-cut: for the 144,000 are not ‘the firstfruits’, but ‘firstfruits’ (no article) section of a far vaster throng: “but each in his own order” - group, company, flight; “Christ the firstfruits, then they that are Christ’s in His Presence” (1 Cor. 15: 23) - in successive reapings during the Parousia. Resurrection accompanies each rapture, both being embodied (Rev. 11: 11, 12) in a single graphic example. The peculiar nature, history, and functions of this particular group of first-cut saints lie outside the sco pc of our present article.

 

 

MATURITY

 

 

The moral lesson now stands forth (as designed) in all its penetrating power. For the grain is reaped solely according to its ripeness. Earth-removal depends, for the servant of God, on spiritual maturity, as exactly and as inevitably as harvesting is dated, not by the farmer, but by the grain. The Lord had already warned us of this momentous principle, in His description of the ripening Church. “First the blade, then the ear, then the full corn in the ear: but when the fruit is RIPE, immediately he putteth forth the sickle, because the harvest is come” (Mark 4: 29). So the identical phrasing is used here. “Send forth thy sickle” - the sickle is ‘sent,’ for it is an intelligent scythe of falling angels - “and reap: for the hour to reap” - an hour which depends solely on the maturity of the grain - “is come; for the harvest of the earth IS OVER-RIPE” (Rev. 14: 15); rather, perfectly ripe, so that the stalk is dry (Alford). Wheat which never ripens would be a blasted field: but the Church of God cannot be a blighted crop: sooner or later, all mature, all are reaped, all are gathered into the Heavenly Garner.*

 

* A broad hint that the corners of the field, which according to the type (Lev. 23: 22) must be reaped later than harvest, are uncut until the neighbourhood of Armageddon is contained in the characteristic Church warning, - “Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments,” [works: cf. Rev. 3: 4, 18] “lest he walk naked, and they see his shame” (Rev. 16: 15).

 

 

HEAVENLINESS

 

 

So now we reach the momentous fact carefully designed to revolutionize our whole Christian life. Maturity in the spiritual realm is grace perfected in the character; and the critical alternative unfolds before us either of maturity gained now by grace, or a forced growth under judgment. For ‘firstfruits’ is not only a time-word, so that if reaped simultaneously with harvest, it is not firstfruits; but it is also a quality-word, for firstfruits (in Scripture) are invariably the pick of the crop (Num. 18: 12), peculiarly holy to God, and to be carried bodily into the House of God (Neh. 10: 37). So of the Christian Firstfruits moral excellence of the highest order is stated; “they are without blemish” (Rev. 14: 5): whereas the Harvest, although ripe at last, has no special excellence, as wheat, stated; and its maturity, unlike that of the Firstfruits, is a maturity not due to rapidity in reaching perfection, but is produced by the slow and painful process of burning heat - “the harvest of the earth is dried up As the Firstfruits are two baked loaves (Lev. 23: 17), burnt edible - so ceasing to be raw grain - through an earlier suffering with Christ, so the Day of the Lord ‘burneth as an oven’ (Mal. 4: 1), thus baking its Loaves: the fierce sun of the Day of Wrath, penetrating grain which avoided the earlier fires, destroys earthliness in the wheat at last. The root cause of maturity is fundamentally the same in both - made perfect through suffering.

 

 

THE CRISIS

 

 

So the urgency of the issue, its summons to sanctity, our practical peril - all lodge in selective rapture alone the rousing truth without which the warnings of God on unwatchfulness fall flat and unheeded. We are exotics ripening for another soil; and sunripe wheat, rather than forced hot-house growth, is God’s ideal: for it is not the pressure of coming judgments, nor any inherent necessity that we should escape the coming perils - martyrs have had as bad - which is the determining factor compelling removal, but a principle quite other - our fitness for the heavenly garner.* And how solemn are the facts! In spite of the huge cataclysm of the War,. With which God shook the world, it is a fact past all denial that the great majority of the Christian groups treat the Saviour’s return with derision. Is this ripeness for the sickle? Nothing short of Tribulation horrors will shock the main mass of the converted into maturity at last.

 

* The blade is the green sprout of a living profession of Christ, a proof past all doubt of vital standing - [in regeneration alone] - in Him; but it is not the fruitful ear, much less the full corn in the ear; and men do not reap blades. It is a decisive confirmation of the interpretation here given that, in the Feasts of the Law which are a complete history in type of the redeemed under grace, wheat (as ever) is the symbol selected for the Church, and the Feast of Harvest (Lev. 23: 9-22) reveals a carefully graded reaping.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE SPIRIT FOR SANCTITY

 

 

A clergyman once told me the following story of his mother. For years past (he said) she has been wholly confined to her bed from nervous prostration. During the early part of this period it did seem that no one could take care of her or endure her continued manifestations of irritability, impatience, fretfulness, and furious anger. Right there, she became, fully convinced that through grace she could have perfect rest, quietude, and self-control. She set her whole heart upon attaining that state. Such was her fervency of spirit and earnestness in prayer, that her friends thought she would become deranged, and urged her to cease seeking and prayer. “I die in the effort,” was her reply, “or I obtain what I know to be in reserve for me.” At length the unction of the Spirit came gently upon her. From that hour there was not the slightest indication of even the remains of that temper. Her quietude and assurance were absolute, and her sweetness of spirit ‘as ointment poured forth.’ It was no trouble to anyone now, but a privilege to all, to care for her. Many came, even from long distances, to listen to her divine discourse. Years passed on, and again I was asked, “What of your mother? Does her faith hold out?” “She is gone,” was the reply. “But from the hour of that experience to that of her death that quietude and assurance remained, and the ineffable sweetness of temper was never for a moment interrupted. I witnessed the closing scene. She died of cholera, and in the greatest conceivable agony. Yet such patience, such serenity of hope, and such quiet waiting for the coming of the Lord, I hardly before deemed possible. “My son,” she would say, “Nature has a hard struggle; but it will soon be over, and I shall enter into the rest that remains for the people of God.” - ASA MAHAN, D.D.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE SPIRIT FOR SERVICE

 

 

Charles Finney was once passing through a room where a number of girls were employed in a manufacturing establishment. He was evidently known to them, and they made every effort to upset his gravity. “Their levity,” he says, “made a peculiar impression upon me; I felt it to my very heart. I stopped short and looked at them; I knew not how, as my whole mind was absorbed with the sense of their guilt and danger. I observed that one of them became very much agitated. A thread broke. She attempted to mend it; but her hands so trembled that she could not do it. I immediately observed that the sensation was spreading. One after another gave up, and paid no more attention to their looms. They fell on their knees. I had not spoken a word; and the noise of the looms would have prevented my being heard, if I had. At this moment the owner of the factory entered. ‘Stop the mill,’ he said; ‘it is more important that souls should be saved than that this mill should be run.’ A meeting of great power followed; and in a few days most of those factory hands, and the owner also, professed to have found salvation in Christ.

 

 

-------

 

 

HE GIVETH MORE GRACE

 

 

He giveth more grace when the burdens grow greater,

He sendeth more strength when the labours increase,

To added affliction He addeth His mercy,

To multiplied trials, His multiplied peace.

 

 

When we have exhaust’d our store of endurance,

When our strength has failed ere the day is half done,

When we reach the end of our hoarded resources,

Our Father’s full giving is only begun.

 

 

His love has no limit, His grace has no measure,

His power no boundary known unto men,

For out of His infinite riches in Jesus

He giveth and giveth and giveth again.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

7

 

A MOTHER’S AMBITION

FOR HER SONS + 2

 

 

 

Salome, one of the holy band of women-ministrants to the Lord, and a star in the still brighter cluster around the Cross, shared with her sons the noble ambition that they might be Daniels to a new and holier Belshazzar, or Josephs to a mightier Pharaohs. So crucially, however, is Kingdom glory dependent on attainment, not on gift obtainable by prayer, that Jesus ignores the mother throughout, and addresses Himself solely to the aspirants for heavenly fame.

 

 

Salome’s prayer had been prompted by a revelation the Lord had just made of approaching glory. Peter, ever the questioning voice of the Church, put a challenge to Jesus which evoked an answer laying bare approaching recompense “Lo he says, “we have left all, and followed thee; what then shall we have?” (Matt. 19: 27): we have beggared ourselves for God; we have invested our all in the world to come: what, Lord, is the recompense for the great renunciation? Sadducees all down the ages have answered that virtue is its own reward, and that the inward joy of doing good is its only recompense. Profoundly different is the reply of Christ. “Verily I say unto you, that ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit on the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones” - the first mention of plural thrones in the New Testament - “Judging the twelve tribes of Israel That is, God’s royalties and enthronements are no fiction and no dream; and they are the enormous compensations awaiting the dethroned and the outcast for Christ.

 

 

Now this critical revelation, rousing the noblest of ambitions, and which had already evoked the petition of Salome and sons, reappears in the last scenes of the upper room. “And there arose also” - in consequence: thrones had been revealed, but no pre-eminence among the thrones - “a contention among them, which of them is accounted greatest” - accounted so already: which is greatest to be greatest; which seems, appears before men, ranks in official position greatest (Luke 22: 24). Having just inquired which should be the traitor, they now inquire which should be the prince; believing the Kingdom imminent, in which administrators would of necessity be required, they imagine to allot amongst themselves the sovereignties of the Age to Come. It is a definite challenge to the Lord to reveal the principles underlying the allotment of Thrones.

 

 

To James and John, therefore, absorbed with the same problem, the Lord first unmasks their ignorance and counters with a home-thrust. “Ye know not what ye ask”: they had neither pondered their prayer, nor mastered the elements of the principles of reward: “are ye able to drink the cup that I drink” - a draught of internal sorrow - “and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with”- an immersion in external trouble (Mark 10: 38)? Not sorrow, but His sorrow, not any cup or baptism, but His: can you bear the heartbreak, and stand the intolerable strain, involved in a full-orbed fidelity to your Lord - the tonic cup and anointing baptism which alone consecrate to supreme rank? Can you bear without flinching, without compromising, without bitterness, without despair? *

 

* The answer of Zebedee’s sons - “We are able” - is met by our Lord’s prophetic knowledge - “Ye shall”: unable, but enabled: of the two, who both fled from the Cross, one took the Gethsemane-cup at the hand of Herod, and the other his baptism in a caldron of boiling oil. It is remarkable that they give the same answer, and rightly (Phil. 4: 13), as that given by the two great victors in the Wilderness type - “We are well able to overcome” (Num. 13: 30).

 

 

So also our Lord enlightens their complete ignorance on the principles of reward. “To sit on my right hand or on my left hand is not mine to give: but it is for them for whom it hath been prepared It is true that Christ is the donor for He says, - “He that overcometh, I will give to him to sit down with me in my throne” (Rev. 3: 21): but it is no capricious appointment, or biassed favouritism, or unmerited gift, or arbitrary selection: it is not to be had merely for the asking, but is ‘prepared’ for those preparing. I cannot give, the Lord implies; I can only adjudge: for a millennial throne is no part of everlasting life, a gift already given to every - [redeemed and regenerate] - child of God. They ask it as a gift: He refuses it as a gift.

 

 

So therefore Jesus addresses Himself to elucidate this crucial revelation; and He first completely negatives all present worldly principles of rank and power. He neither rebukes His disciples’ ambition, nor casts any doubt on the coming sovereignty; but He completely revolutionizes their conception of the path to - [His coming Kingdom and] - the Throne. “The kings of the Gentiles He says, present royalties, “have lordship over them” - that is, they have their thrones now; “and they that have authority over them are called Benefactors” * - saviours of society, or philanthropists (Luke 22: 25): “not so shall it be among you” (Matt. 20: 26). That is, stars and orders and peerages and princedoms - even the applause conferred on scientists and philanthropists and politicians and millionaire donors of princely benefactions - are, in a Christian, proof that, in this sphere, he has acted on non-Christian principles.

 

* The word our Lord uses - Euergetes - was actually a title given to Kings in that age; as to Cyrus among the Persians, Antigonus among the Greeks, and Marcus Aurelius among the Romans: and it is a curious coincidence that the Zionists keep in their central cities, to commemorate the founders of their Colonies, a roll called the Golden Book of Benefactors.

 

 

Having thus negatived, for the Church, all royalties in this - [evil and apostate] - age - “ye have reigned as kings” is a reproach of Paul the merchant-princes in the Church of Corinth (1 Cor. 4: 8) - there now bursts on us the extraordinary revolution in ambition which our Lord has brought us in His unique teaching, as He now lays bare the pathway to the imminent [Millennial] Thrones. “But ye” - for the axioms of Gentiles can be no principles for the Church - “shall not be so; but he that is the greater among you” - greater in the earthly sense: more distinguished in birth, in station, in training, in gifts - “let him become” - of his own free action and choice - “as the younger” - that is, taking the lowlier place assigned to a junior; “and he that is chief” - head and shoulders above others in attainments and achievements - “as he that doth serve” (Luke 22: 26) - a servant, as Matthew (20: 27) says, not of some, but of all. So to James and John seeking, not thrones, but supreme thrones, the Lord Jesus puts a still sharper antithesis:- “Whosoever would become great among you” - attain royalty beyond the broken tombs - “shall be your servant; and whosoever would be FIRST among you” - the greatest among the great - “shall be SLAVE of all” - supreme now in self-abasing service (Mark 10: 43). There is a path, our Lord says, for holy ambition to tread, culminating in thrones; but it is no path leading in this age to high office and official dignities and popular applause: it is the actual reverse of the world’s ambition for more wealth, more power, more fame. “Seekest thou great things for thyself? Seek them not” (Jer. 45: 5). By achieving great things now, we lose them hereafter; by renouncing them now, we achieve them then: and it is remarkable that our Lord closes His first revelation of the Thrones by exhibiting the constant crossing and re-crossing of the runners in the race - “but many shall be last that are first; and first that are last” (Matt. 19: 30).

 

 

Next, the Lord presents Himself as the embodiment, the type, the first case in the working of the new law. “For” - as a sharp contrast embodied in Himself - “whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? Is not he that sitteth at meat - there is such a thing as rank, dignity, precedence, “but” - how (He asks) do you explain this? - “I” - your Chief, your King, the destined Heir to the Throne of all thrones - “am in the midst of you AS HE THAT SERVETH” - and so till death; crownless, throneless, outcast. And the Lord enforced the lesson, there and then, by a visible act which, whether we take it as instruction embodied in an ever-recurring ritual, or as a parable in action done once for all, is extraordinarily illuminating. To teach them the sublime and novel truth that the world-rulers of the future must be the servants of to-day, that self-abasement is the germ of all future greatness, “Jesus took a towel, and girded himself, and began to wash the disciples’ feet” (John 13: 4).* That is, present service regulates future rank; and the nearer to Christ in grace, the nearer to Christ in glory.

 

* If foot-washing had been maintained as a ritual - Bingham’s “Antiquities” records the fact that some fifty per cent. of the sub-apostolic churches practised it - it is certain that the truth our Lord is inculcating would not have been so largely lost.

 

 

But our Lord, setting the example for a crowd of later Scriptures, also reveals the parallel line in the double rail-track leading to the Throne. “But” - lest you imagine from these new principles that future royalties are a fiction and a dream - “ye are they” - servants singled-out and choice - “which” - unlike Judas, and many another renegade disciple all down the ages - “have continued with me in my temptations The Lord lays deep in sorrow and suffering the foundations of coming greatness. The Saviour’s ‘testings’ - not His temptations in the wilderness, for the Apostles were not with Him then - were life-long: in His reproaches, poverties, afflictions, persecutions they had shown unswerving loyalty: in all His afflictions they were afflicted. “If we suffer with Him, we shall also reign with Him: if we deny Him, He also will deny us” (2 Tim. 2: 12).” As McCheyne says, “must put his foot upon the thorn: we must taste the gall if we are to taste the glory.” So then we come to the great and closing summary in answer to Peter’s question - “Lo, we have left all, and followed Thee: what then shall we have“And” - Jesus says - ‘and’ as a consequence, as a reward: the inevitable ‘and’ of our Lord’s fidelity to fidelity - “I appoint unto you a kingdom, EVEN AS” - for those who deny reward to disciples, must also deny reward to their Master: Christ and His followers are recompensed on identical grounds - “my Father appointed unto me a Kingdom, that ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom” - the Millennial therefore, not the Eternal; the Kingdom which the Lord ultimately gives up to the Father (1 Cor. 15: 24); “and ye” - Twelve Apostles, for your peculiar and personal allotment of honour: our Lord foresaw Matthias replacing Judas - “shall sit on THRONES” - thrones come at last - “judging the twelve tribes of Israel* Supreme in service, the Apostles will be supreme in sphere. Thus, once for all, the Lord makes manifest the conditions of Millennial Royalty, the grounds on which “I appoint unto you a Kingdom The Kingdom is no general inheritance of all who - [are now regenerate and] - believe, but a special appointment to disciples tried and approved: the Lord grounds the gift not on faith but on fidelity: even Apostles are not given it as apostles, and much less because they are among the saved; but it is appointed them because they have loyally, courageously, unswervingly shared the ministries and sufferings of Christ. “He that overcometh, I will give to him to sit down with me in my throne, as I also overcame, and sat down with my Father in his throne” (Rev. 3: 21).

 

* Few will deny that the Apostles are part of the Church (Eph. 2: 20). Their reign over Israel’s tribes, therefore, proves that the Church’s Millennial destiny is earthly as well as heavenly, though more heavenly than earthly (2 Tim. 4: 8).

 

 

-------

 

 

OUR BODIES

 

 

The Scriptural doctrine of the resurrection invites this physical frame of mine with an infinite dignity and importance. Death is its temporary dissolution, not its destruction. With what magnitude of interest and importance does this invest these corporal frames of ours! It confers upon them an awful indestructibility, at the thought of which even the perpetuity of mountains, of suns and stars, become as nothing. You have a bodily as well as a spiritual immortality. These bodies shall claim half of your individuality to all eternity. Can you, then, make them the instruments of sin, or defile them by unholy lusts? Must you not guard with utmost care the imperishable temple of the soul?

 

J. T. DAVIDSON, D.D.

 

 

-------

 

 

DISSIMILAR FLESH

 

 

He who made dust out of nothing can find no difficulty in remaking bodies out of dust. “Many bodies, different kinds, flesh, birds, beasts, men, are formed from the same dust and the same food. Therefore the same dust used to create an earthly or natural body may be used of God to create a heavenly or spiritual body. But both the earthly, or natural, and the heavenly or spiritual, are to be bodies. The argument (1 Cor. 15: 39) is based upon the diverse use of the same creative power, employing the same creature substance.” (J. C. MASSAE, D.D.).

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

8

 

THE REIGN OF CHRIST + 3

 

 

By D. A. COOK

 

 

 

The subduing of all things to the Son is the supreme will of God. “Having made known unto us the mystery of His Will, that in the dispensation of the fulness of times He might gather together in one, all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth, even in Him” (Eph. 1: 9, 10). “That in the Name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord” (Phil. 2: 10, 11). “And having made peace through the Blood of His Cross, by Him to reconcile all things unto Himself, by Him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven” (Col. 1: 20) that in all things HE might have the pre-eminence

 

 

In these passages of Scripture, this thought predominates. There exists an enmity in the universe, against God, which needs reconciling. The whole world is in rebellion against Him, and is consequently going to be judged, and the rebellion destroyed. But before the world-dominion of Christ is set up it must first be set up in the members of His Body - the people He has chosen to be one with Him in His [coming Millennial] Kingdom. Therefore, [an understanding of] - His Kingdom must be established IN them, before it can be established - [after their Resurrection] -  BY them. “Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world?” “Know ye not that we shall judge angels But how can this be, if these people are themselves in partial rebellion to His Rule? Before the Throne is set up on earth, His reign must be set up in those who are to share His Throne. Otherwise, there are traitors in His Kingdom.

 

 

Is it sincere to pray “Thy kingdom come; Thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven if we are not prepared for that Kingdom and that will to hold full sway in the hearts and lives of us who pray? Obedience is not a collective thing, but individual, and there can only be the carrying out of His will upon earth as each individual is brought into subjectivity to His Rule. “Bless the Lord, ye His angels ... that do His Commandments, hearkening unto the Voice of His Word.” In heaven, there is no clash of wills or rebellion. It is this obedience we must first claim, and then exercise, trusting the Holy Spirit to glorify and enthrone Christ in the heart, for it. His work, not ours. Ours is but to trust Him to fulfil it. “God hath delivered us out of the dominion of darkness, and translated us into the reign of His dear Son” (Col. 1: 13). He is able to subdue all things unto Himself (Phil. 3: 21). “For He MUST reign, till He hath put all enemies under His feet” (1 Cor. 15: 25). “Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing unto captivity every thought to the obedience Christ” (2 Cor. 10: 5).

 

 

And this obedience does not come about automatically; that is, without the full consent and co-operation of the Will, for God does not treat His people like machines, but looks for their willing, intelligent co-operation with His working. The members, mind, will and heart, must be offered up to God, to take sides with Him against all that He is against, and for the reign of Christ to become operative. “Yield yourselves unto God ... and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God“Let not sin therefore reign (Rom. 6: 12, 13). How can we reign with Him, unless He first reigns in us? It is not likely that we can subdue rebellion and sin in others, while these things are still unsubdued in us; just so much of our being that is not actually brought under His Rule, is in rebellion against Him, for there is no neutrality in the spiritual realm. “He that is not with Me is against Me

 

 

The enmity that is at the root of our fallen nature, must be dealt with, and it still exists, even in those who are born again, until the Holy Spirit succeeds in breaking it down, and subduing all things to Christ, who “MUST reign, till all enemies are under His feet And notice, that the setting up of His [millennial] Throne does not mean that all enemies are then and there subdued; but His Throne is set up, in order that He may be in a position to assert His authority and right, to put all things under Him, and for the subduing of all that resists Him; and He goes on reigning UNTIL that objective is reached, and then it is accomplished.

 

 

It is clear that He does not invest us with authority, to cast out of others, that which still reigns in us. “Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye, and then thou shalt see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye Rebellion is going to be judged. “They (the angels) shall gather out of His Kingdom all things that offend” (Matt. 13: 41). This means judgment. There is judgment also for the children of God. “If we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged Self-judgment is allotted to us now, but hereafter - [our Resurrection from the dead] - we shall judge the world. “judgment must begin at the  house of God”; and it is clear that we cannot reign over Christ’s enemies, until He has reigned over His enemies in us.

 

 

The Son won His Kingdom by obedience. The first Adam lost dominion through disobedience. The Last Adam gained it by obedience. “Let the mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus”; Who was “obedient unto death, even the death of the Cross. Wherefore, God hath highly exalted Him The way to the Kingdom and the Throne, for Christ, the Representative Man, and Last Adam, was by death. And it is so also, for every one that is “born of God The Lord Jesus took the old Adam to the Cross, substitutionally, for “in Him is no sin,” but we have that old Adam nature within us, and therefore we must consent to the Cross.

 

 

The truth that there is no glory or reigning apart from discipline and training is clearly brought out in 1 Pet. 4: 12, 13, 17: - “Rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ’s sufferings; that when His glory shall be revealed, ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.” “For the time is come when judgment must begin at the house of God So let us invest our Lord and Saviour with His Royal robes, and put the crown upon His Head, and acknowledge Him as KING OF KINGS and LORD OF LORDS, and then we shall be fitted to reign with Him when He is universally acknowledged.

 

 

-------

 

 

FATAL FLAWS

 

 

1. Every one of these Utopias is built over a seething volcano of unregenerate human nature.

 

 

2. Every one is an attempt to establish the Kingdom without the King.

 

 

3. Every one is in open defiance of the known will of God as revealed in the prophecies of God.

 

 

4. Not one has any kingdom for the dead, or can break a single grave.

 

 

5. Not one, where it has full local power, has ever established anything remotely like the Kingdom of God.

 

 

6. All lodge the origen of the Kingdom in this - [evil, apostate, and satanic] - world, whereas our Saviour said:- “My Kingdom is not from thence

 

 

7. All unite in an explicit, deliberate, and final refusal of the one fact which can alone produce the Kingdom - the return of the King.

 

 

-------

 

 

ARRESTED INFLUENCE

 

 

Paul suddenly stumbles on a painful difficulty in getting a truth home, and his difficulty at once reveals the peril of a mutilated creed. “When by reason of the time” - the lapse of years since conversion - “Ye ought” - for you might - “to be teachers” - so grounded, so passionately convinced, so masters of the truth as to be imparting it to others - “ye have need again that some teach you the rudiments of the  first principles of the oracles of God” (Heb. 5: 12). It is startling to learn that all [regenerate] believers ought, in time, if not to be actual teachers, at least to be capable of teaching. The Hebrews’ pitiable condition of importance can be the miscarriage of a lifetime. An aged minister, pacing his room in profound agitation, exclaimed:- “Would to God I might have once again the years that are gone!” Needing their alphabet afresh - how pitiable! Years of possible helpfulness to others irretrievable gone - how tragic! Not to grow in mastery of the Oracles of God is to be in peril of losing their very rudiments. All truth is so inter-locked, and elementary truth is so dependant on its far vaster setting, that they who preach the Gospel [good news] only will soon have no gospel to preach. Possibly thousands unblessed through us, who might have been, is a heavy price to pay for a meagre creed and a halting life.

 

D. M. PANTON.

 

 

-------

 

 

LOST AUTHORITY

 

 

All authority in religion vanishes with the Bible. Even the Papacy collapses with the historical veracity of the Gospels. “It is hard to estimate,” says Dr. R. F. Horton, in his vitiation - [i.e. his ‘official inspection visit’] -to the Oxford Conference on Authority in July, “the weakness and hesitation which have resulted from an apparent shifting of the ground of Authority, or the strength and confidence which would come into our work if we were all clear and united in our answer to the question: ‘by what authority we do these things” it will be sad to watch the basing of authority on conflicting consciences, or on an indwelling but wholly inarticulate Christ, or on an imaginary ‘spirit of God’ in pure reason, or on Scriptures an indistinguishable blend of fact and fiction, or on Science changing like a chameleon-efforts as painful as gaining a footing on an iceberg. “The saddest sight in this generation,” Dr. H. E. Fosdick has just said, “is of the men and women who have run away from their old-fashioned faith and have ended up with no faith at all.” Blindness must surely have fallen on critics who so completely fail to recognize their own handiwork.

 

 

-------

 

 

9

 

CHURCH DISCIPLINE BY

THE HOLY GHOST + 2

 

 

 

Problems many and grave were solved once for all on the threshold of the Church of God. For no sooner is there a Paradise than there is once again a Flaming Sword. “It is,” says Dr. Oswald Dykes, “to mark the sanctity of that enclosure, which is now for the first time called the Church, that this narrative of judgment is set thus in the forefront of its history. On the earliest appearance of open sin within the Church follows the earliest infliction of Church discipline; and because it is the earliest, it is taken out of the hands of servants, to he administered with appalling severity by the hand of the Master.” Its solemnity could hardly be more solemn. Within a stone’s throw of Pentecost is an outbreak of daring sin in the Church: the sin is met by immediate judgment from the Holy Ghost: an excommunication on the spot is accompanied by instant death: the first curse of the Church, prophetic of a constant curse, is undevoted wealth: the first believers who die after Pentecost are publicly executed by God for the love of money. It is an outburst of Shekinah Glory in the Spiritual Temple, more awful than any recorded in the Temple of old, of almost intolerable brightness; and nothing is more sorrowful down the Christian centuries than the dangerous unbelief with which the Church has too often met the lesson the Holy Spirit sought to teach her in her dawn.

 

 

For Ananias and Sapphira, as among the souls “added to the Church because “saved and added not by man, but by “ the Lord” (Acts 2: 47), had a conversion that is unchallengeable. That the Apostles (like ourselves) had no jurisdiction over unbelievers, the punishment of whose sins must be left solely to God - “for what have I to do with judging them that are without? Do ye not judge them that are within (1. Cor. 5:  12) - further establishes their regeneration and explains why, where an Elymas gets a transient blindness and a Simon Magus goes unscathed, an Ananias - for covetousness, one of the excommunicating sins: for it was covetousness that prompted his lie - gets instantaneous “destruction of the flesh” (1 Cor. 5: 5). The penalty wielded by the Holy Ghost is the penalty commanded for this very sin occurring inside the Church. Never once does the Apostle raise the question of their [eternal] salvation, or cast a shadow of doubt, on their standing in Christ. “Ananias was a member of the Christian Church; he had, in all probability, with the rest received the Holy Ghost; and hence he was in the enjoyment of greater privileges, and under heavier responsibilities,* than either Simon or Elymas.” (P. J. Gloag, D.D.). Nor was his sin a foundation sin at all. “Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, and kept back part of the price” (Acts 5: 1). In a great flood-tide of revival, when everyone naturally wishes to appear on the crest of the wave, there is an inevitable temptation to a profession of devotion more apparent than real: so Ananias merely keeps back a part of the sum which he said was the whole. The poor of the Church, gazing at the gift laid before the Apostles, would marvel at his munificence and would regard the donors as trophies of grace, and splendid, proofs of what the Holy Spirit can do in human character and life.

 

[* NOTE: To assume all regenerate believers, irrespective of their behaviour, are continually indwelt by the Holy Spirit, is to assume He can never leave them because of their disobedience! See Acts 5: 32; cf. 1 Sam. 16: 14, LXX. and I Sam. 18: 12, R.V.]

 

 

Now the Apostle, gifted with the ‘discerning of spirits at once unveils the Church as the stage of a constant drama of the other world: his questions rip open the supernatural struggle going on in every assembly of believers. “Ananias, why hath Satan” - no sooner is the Paradise of the Church created, than the Serpent is found in it - “filled thy heart” - filled it, that is, not with himself, but with an evil conspiracy - “to lie to the Holy Ghost Two great protagonists stand out on the floor of the Church, one descended from Heaven, one risen from Hell - the Holy Ghost and Satan; and Satan, inside the Church, can lure a [regenerate] believer to his death. The Apostle puts a parallel question to Sapphira:- “How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord - how dared you experiment, to see whether the [Holy] Spirit knows all things, and so your secret? Or whether He would care; or whether He would act? How ghastly the blunder events quickly proved. The [Holy] Spirit knew the market price; He knew the exact sum retained; He had - far more wonderfully - overheard Satan whispering at the door of the man’s heart; He was present at the family conclave; He so cared that He did what Christ never did in the whole of His ministry on earth; and He acts without a moment’s warning.

 

 

Peter’s remonstrance is exceedingly illuminating. “While it remained, did it not remain thine own? And after it was sold, was it not in thy power - that is to say, both the estate itself, and the proceeds of the sale, were exclusively Ananias’s: the Lord’s word to sell all, and give to the poor (Luke 12: 33), is a counsel of perfection, not a requirement of obligation: therefore Ananias was a perfectly free agent, and so a perfectly responsible agent. And even after the estate had been sold, with the object of giving all, God still allows a change of mind; “after it was sold, was it not in thy power for any part of our property may be retained, until faith is strong enough to give up all; or all may be kept, without penal consequences. There was no physical necessity, no church necessity, no moral necessity, no necessity whatever - only the exquisite efflorescence of Christian love, or the wise investment of earthly funds in heavenly stock - why Ananias should part with anything at all.

 

 

Now instantly falls the Divine excommunication. “And Ananias hearing these words” - God’s mere statement of a sin can be a death-warrant - “fell down and gave up the ghost [i.e. his animating ‘spirit’].” “It was well that men should be taught once for all, by sudden death treading swiftly on the heels of detected sin, that the Gospel, which discovers God’s boundless mercy, has not wiped out the sterner attributes of the judge” (Oswald Dykes, D.D.). The reason why this first and sharpest of all Church discipline for two thousand years has never again been so dramatically repeated is most significant. If there were no such case of instant and condign punishment among the saved, we must have concluded that, for believers, God’s justice is shackled and sheathed; on the other hand, if every such sin met with instant judgment, we must have concluded that this is no dispensation of grace, nor ours a mercy-seat: there is one, as a sample of judgment coming; but only one, for the Mercy Seat defers infliction, almost invariably, to a future - [after the time of death (Heb. 9: 27, R.V.)] - Judgment Seat. God sometimes slays now, lest we doubt His justice: He often defers judgment, lest we doubt His patience. “Divine judgment knows no respect of persons, but calls believers as well as unbelievers before its bar; yea, steps even more quickly among the former, as the servants who know the Lord’s will: judgment must begin at the house of God” (Lange). The perplexing rarity, yet coupled with the astounding fact, is expounded in one, pregnant word of Paul. “Some men’s sins are evident” - are instantly exposed - “going before unto judgment” - provoking judgment at once; “and some men also” - cloaked hypocrisies to the last - “they follow after into the other world, and into the Age beyond (1 Tim. 5: 24). The Spirit, who never slew an enemy for the life of the Church, slays two of her own [redeemed] children for her purity. It is immoral and impossible that Ananias should be struck dead, and all other Ananias’s of the Church die in their beds, for ever unjudged. “It is only a demonstration of the invisible judgment which, without any such open manifestation, rests upon every previous or subsequent Ananias” (Stier).

 

 

So vital is this truth for the whole Church that the [Holy] Spirit doubles the witness, as well as records its history. “Behold the feet of them which have buried thy husband shall carry thee out The second death, following so sharply and so exactly in the track of the first, like a swiftly doubled peal of thunder, must have caused tenfold terror. So high were the privileges of Ananias and Sapphira, so magnificent their opportunities in the heart of the miracle-gifted Church of the Apostles, that they are given no warning; no time for reflection; no call to repentance; no pardon: in a moment Peter has used the Keys, and locked the Kingdom - “whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained” (John 20: 23): “be not deceived; neither thieves, nor covetous, nor extortioners shall inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6: 10)

 

 

Thus the doctrine that the [regenerate] believer’s person is immune from the judgment of God, and that the Judgment Seat takes cognizance of his works only, is here proved untrue; and the assumption, not rarely made, at least subconsciously, that the backslider is necessarily restored before death the case of Ananias also proves to be false.* How profound the awe of this initial lesson on the threshold of the Church! “‘Great fear came upon all them that heard these things’: noteworthy words, which clearly show that the possibility that any one of them might become an Ananias was present to the minds of all the disciples, full of grace as they were” (Stier). It is overwhelmingly solemn that modem exponents of privilege seem to have passed into almost total blindness on responsibility. An ambitious mountain climber, thrilled with excitement, stood erect at last upon an Alpine peak in an ecstasy of enjoyment, when his guide shouted, - “On your knees, Sir! You are not safe here except on your knees

 

*.Nevertheless the death-penalty, either here (1 Cor. 11: 30) or hereafter (Matt. 24: 51), cannot alter the believer’s standing, nor forfeit his eternal life. Peter utters no warning to Ananias of eternal death, nor perdition, as he does to Simon Magus (Acts 8: 20): nay, on the contrary, excommunication, whether enforced by the [Holy] Spirit or the Church, is a “destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus” (1 Cor. 5: 5).

 

 

-------

 

 

CHRIST

 

 

Not merely in the words you say,

Not only in your deeds confess’d

But in the most unconscious way

In Christ express’d.

 

 

Is it a beatific smile?

A holy light upon your brow?

Oh, no: I felt His presence while

You laugh’t just now.

 

 

For me ’twas not the truth you taught,

To you so clear, to me still dim,

But when you came you brought

A sense of Him.

 

 

And from your eyes He beckons me,

And from your heart His love is shed,

Till I lost sight of you - and see

The Christ instead.

 

 

The Lightbearer.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE SERF

 

 

“Ye rich, weep and howl for the miseries that are coming upon you!”

 

 

Bow’d by the weight of centuries he leans

Upon his hoe and gazes on the ground,

The emptiness of ages in his face,

And on his back the burden of the world.

O masters, lords and rulers in all lands,

How will the future reckon with this man?

How answer this brute question in that hour

When whirlwinds of rebellion shake the world?

How will it be with kingdoms and with kings -

With those who shaped him to the thing he is -

When this dumb Terror shall reply to God

After the silence of the centuries?

 

 

                                                                                                   - EDWIN MARKHAM.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

10

 

APOSTOLICAL SUCCESSION + 1

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

Drawing closer every year, the great Sacerdotal Churches, as they bear down on us like enormous steam-rollers threatening to crush out all opposition, compel us - whether we will or no - to master the problem which is central to their claim. That claim is that all bishops in the true succession down the ages act in the place, and with the authority, of the original Apostles; and it is a claim which can be brought home on the conscience with a pressure as powerful as the pressure of the Inquisition on the body. “BISHOPS,” says the Council of Trent (Session xxiii.), “HAVE SUCCEEDED UNTO THE PLACE OF THE APOSTLES.” It is very remarkable that the Episcopal Churches have never claimed that their Bishops are Apostles:* what they claim is that, Apostles having lapsed, and bishops having replaced apostles in the government of the Church as a matter of historical fact, the Bishops have succeeded to the spiritual authority and power of the Apostles; that the government of the Church has descended to them from the Apostles; and that so the authority of the Apostolate is now vested in the Episcopate.

 

* So “the Apostolic Fathers,” says Bishop Lightfoot, “look upon themselves as distinct from the Apostles1 Cor. 12: 28.

 

 

THE ORDER OF APOSTLES

 

 

It is one of the mysteries in the history of the Church of God how completely the Church has ignored, forgotten, disregarded the miraculous constitution with which God started His Church on earth, with the Apostles as the keystone in the Church. “God hath set” - as limbs in the joints, so orders in the Church - “in the Church” - for miracles and miraculous wonders, so far from being in Corinth only, were as wide as the Church, and existed wherever the Church was - “first APOSTLES”*:- first in order, for the apostolate was the first office the Lord created in His Church; and first in authority, for apostles appear to have possessed the plenitude of miraculous endowment. The Apostles, like the Prophets, were thus, an order in the Church, not an arbitrary selection of a unique group, but (in God’s design) essential and dominant limbs in the Body of Christ:** whose functions were (1) the witness of personal knowledge of the Risen Lord; *** (2) dispensers, by the laying on of their hands, of the Holy Ghost; and (3) the exercise of final authority in the Church, as the principal channels of immediate inspiration from its Invisible Head. “There is no authority as Bishop Lightfoot has said, “that the order afterwards called ‘bishops’ were formerly called ‘apostles’ Miracle entered into the very warp and woof of the New Testament Church; and “the Apostolate combines the two sides of gift and office, both raised to their highest power” (Godet).

 

* 1 Cor. 12: 28.

 

** Twenty-two are named in the New Testament, with implications of at least two more. Eusebius speaks of ‘numberless apostles’ beside the Twelve: so the Didache treats the Apostles, equally with the Prophets, as an Order.

 

*** “The name expresses the character of those who had either been immediately sent forth by Christ Himself, or who had been raised to a level with the Twelve by direct revelations from Him” (Dean Stanley). So Paul saw Christ before he became an apostle, and probably in order to become one. “Among the properties belonging to an apostle,” says Bengel, “it was one, that he should have seen the Lord Jesus Christ: so that false apostles were persons who not only preached false doctrine, but also set it forth with an apostolical air as if they had seen Christ, or perhaps falsely pretended to have done so1 Cor. 9: 1.

 

 

PROOFS OF AN APOSTLE

 

 

Now for powers so absolute, and for claims so lofty, there must be evidences as decisive and unique; and the more so because “in all ages of the Church persons have appeared who have claimed apostolic authority” (Lange). Therefore, when critics challenged his apostleship, Paul reveals its indispensable evidence and its unchallengeable foundation. “Truly he says, “the SIGNS of an apostle” - the proofs, the evidences, the identifying seals of apostleship: of the Apostle - that is, ‘of him who is invested with the apostolical mission’ (Dean Stanley) - “were wrought among you by SIGNS and WONDERS and MIGHTY WORKS” (2 Cor. 12: 12): ‘signs’ as God-derived power, legitimating his mission; ‘wonders as awesome proofs to all mankind of a supernatural message; and ‘powers as actual accomplishments outside the range of all merely natural devotion or gift. This fulness of [divine] miracle is never stated of any but Apostles - except Christ, and Antichrist (2 Thess. 2: 8). So all real Apostles God authenticates, and His main authentication is miracle-working powers; no one, therefore, unsupported by ‘the powers of the age to come can be an apostle: for an office so unique, the evidence must always be as unique. Others might possess some powers: apostles must possess all.

 

 

FALSE APOSTLES

 

 

Our problem, therefore, rapidly approaches solution. It is obvious at a glance that apostleship, while creatable at any time by God, is incapable of mere official and formal transmission to successors. For Paul reveals that false apostles would be liable to crop up throughout the Christian ages. “Such men are false apostles, fashioning themselves into apostles of Christ” (2 Cor. 11: 13): ‘they appear to be apostles of Christ only by a concealment of their own true nature’ (Dean Stanley). Profession, pretension, language, possibly doctrine - were all correct, yet the man was false.* The probing of the reality behind the name, therefore, is commended by our Lord in language remarkably strong, and He selects it (so important is it) as the one signal service of the Ephesian Angel. “I know that thou didst try” - ‘sift, thoroughly examine’ (Moses Stuart) - “them which call themselves apostles, and they are not, and didst find them false” (Rev. 2: 2). Exactly how the Ephesian Angel unmasked these false claimants to apostleship we are not told; but the easiest of all tests of an apostle is ready to our hand in the challenge put into the hands of his enemies by Paul to test his own: the simple challenge to produce the plenitude of [divine] miracle which constitutes [true] apostleship.

 

* “Trust nothing to appearances, even though angelic: they who fear no danger never try the spirits” (Lange).

 

 

APOSTOLIC CLAIMS

 

 

Now, therefore, we have reached an impregnable position for confronting the double modern peril. For we are threatened at this moment with two claimants to apostolic jurisdiction; and the double-edged sword of Scripture flashes right and left, mortally. We are confronted by ‘Tongues’ apostles, claiming miracles; and by claimants to apostolic succession, claiming no miracles. The first we dismiss for childish insufficiency of miracle. No Mormon or Irvingite ‘apostle’ of eighty years ago, no Tongues ‘apostle’ of to-day, no secret ‘apostles’ now concealed in various parts of the world and attended by esoteric circles, no Theosophic ‘apostles’ of Krishnamurti - have ever produced a single ‘power’ beyond the trivial ‘tongues’ and ‘healings’ already perfectly familiar to the Spiritualistic sιance. “Every office as Dr. Hodge says, “necessarily supposes the corresponding gift. No man could be an apostle without the gift of infallibility; nor a prophet without the gift of inspiration; nor a healer of diseases without the gift of healing. Men may appoint to offices for which they have not the necessary gifts, but God never. If any man therefore claims to be an apostle without the gift, he is a pretender.” The second claim is demolished with still greater speed. Apostles alone can exercise apostolic authority: successors of apostles without the ‘signs’ of an apostle are not apostles: apostles with ‘signs’ but not apostolic ‘signs are false apostles. Apostles have lapsed - so infallibility (and therefore autocracy) have lapsed also, exactly as in the old forecast and studied type, the Theocracy lapsed with Urim and Thummim. The substitution of ‘successors’ for apostles, the ungifted for the miracle-gifted, is merely for stags to pose as lions, or bows and arrows to claim the authority of cannon. The sole ground for apostolic authority is apostolic power.

 

 

OUR SEAT OF AUTHORITY

 

 

What then is our seat of authority? Apostles are gone and to submit to successors wholly devoid of apostolic powers as though they were apostles is so dangerous, so obviously unscriptural, and so impossible because of mutually excommunicated episcopates, that some other seat of authority is imperative. The answer is transparent. We have ‘the Apostles’ ‘doctrine’ (Acts 2: 42) we have ‘the revelations of His holy Apostles and Prophets’ (Eph. 3: 5) we have ‘the commandments of the Apostles’ (2 Pet. 3: 2 ) and we have ‘the words of the Apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ’ (Jude 17). We might have more words, but could not have conflicting words - a larger body of truth, but not a different body of truth - if living Apostles were speaking amongst us.* The seat of authority remains what it always was - the Holy Spirit speaking through apostles and prophets; and in the Holy Scriptures, surviving intact from the age of inspiration, we are built, and are building, on ‘the foundation of the apostles and prophets’ (Eph. 2: 20). It follows as a truism that all who do so are, ipso facto, the sole Apostolic Church on earth.

 

* “If I read our Lord’s mind aright, apostles must - [in the near future] - be restored. Luke 11, Matt. 23: 34; Luke 12: 41-46; Matt. 24: 41-51” (Govett).

 

 

-------

 

 

AN APOSTLE’S WITNESS

 

 

Christ, the Son of God, hath sent me

Through the midnight lands;

Mine the mighty ordination

Of the pierced Hands.

 

 

Mine the message, grand and glorious,

Strange, unseal’d surprise,-

That the goal is God’s Beloved,

Christ in Paradise.

 

 

Hear me, weary men and women,

Sinners dead in sin,-

I am come from heaven to tell you

Of the love within:

 

 

Not alone of God’s great pathway

Leading up to Heaven;

Not alone that you may enter

Stainless and forgiven;

 

 

Not alone of rest and gladness

Tears and sighing fled;

Not alone of life eternal

Breathed into the dead:-

 

 

But I tell you I have seen Him,

God’s beloved Son,

From His lips have learnt the mystery

He and His are one.

 

 

There, as knit into the body

Every joint and limb,

We, His ransom’d, His beloved,

We are one with Him;

 

 

All in marvellous completeness

Added to the Lord,

There to be His crown of glory,

His supreme reward.

 

 

Wondrous prize of our high calling

Speed we on to this,

Past the cities of the angels

Further into bliss;

 

 

On into the depths eternal

Of the love and song,

Where in God the Father’s glory

Christ has waited long:

 

 

He who in His hour of sorrow

Bore the curse alone

I who through the lonely desert

Trod where He had gone:

 

 

He and I, in that bright glory,

One deep joy to share

Mine, to be for ever with Him;

His, that I am there.

 

 

                                                                                                   - TER STEEGEN.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

11

 

THE LAYING ON OF HANDS

 

 

 

The laying on of hands - that is, bodily contact - has been from the dawn of the world a means of transmission of powers or gifts from God to man, or from one man to another. ‘The Hand of the Lord’ was upon David as he played, upon Elisha and Isaiah as they prophesied, and upon Ezekiel as he saw his visions by Chebar. It might be for the imparting of physical strength. “And the hand of the Lord was on Elijah; and he girded up his loins, and ran before Ahab to the entrance of Jezreel” (1 Kings 18: 46):- an exhausted man could outrun a chariot if touched by God. Or the hands might impart gifts of wisdom for office. At God’s command Moses laid his hands on Joshua; and we read:- “Joshua was full of the spirit of wisdom; for Moses had laid his hands upon him” (Dent. 34: 9). Moreover, just as contagion - that is, infection by contact - is a constant transmitter of disease, so contact by physical touch, from those empowered of the Holy Ghost, was the normal means of miraculous cure. “All they that had any sick brought them unto Him; and He laid his hands on every one of them, and healed them” (Luke 4: 40).

 

 

Now in the plan of God, after the Holy Ghost had been poured forth - on the Jew in Jerusalem, and on the Gentile at Caesarea - the laying on of hands, for the transmission of the miraculous gifts, was made one main function of apostleship. We read, - “through the laying, on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Ghost was given” (Acts 8: 18); and again, “when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them” (Acts 19: 6). In the case of the Seventy on Sinai God had imparted the [Holy] Spirit directly, and without any imposition of hands. “And the Lord took of the Spirit that was upon [Moses], and put it upon the seventy elders; and it came to pass when the Spirit rested upon them, they prophesied” (Num. 11: 25). Under the new dispensation this power was lodged solely in the apostleship. Apostles were made the reservoir, and their hands the aqueducts, of the [Holy] Spirit,* the supply of Whom had already been established on earth by a double illapse out of heaven, in the Pentecost of the Jew and the Pentecost of the Gentile; and so after the Holy Ghost’s arrival, Apostles were the sole channel of the [Holy] Spirit, and the baptism in the [Holy] Spirit becomes “the baptism of the laying on of hands” (Heb. 6: 2).**

 

* So much so that the shadow of Peter cured (Acts 5: 15), and handkerchiefs from the person of Paul dispossessed (Acts 19: 12).

 

** The order of the Greek is this:- “baptisms (1) of teaching, or instruction, and (2) of laying on of hands”: the baptism of water, and the baptism of Spirit.

 

 

Now we arrive at a point so crucial, so solving countless modem problems, so devastating to ecclesiastical pretensions or inflated personal claims, that its importance can hardly be exaggerated. In what lay the proof that the Holy Ghost was transmitted? An assertion so stupendous - that a Person of the Godhead has been conferred by one man on another - how is it proved fact, and not fancy? The answer is patent at Caesarea. “The Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. And they of the circumcision which believed were amazed, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost: FOR they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God” (Acts 10: 44). Here disciples profoundly sceptical were at once silenced and convinced by unchallengeable miracle evidenced before their eyes. Exactly the same proof established transmission of the [Holy] Spirit not by illapse, but through apostolic hands. “And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and PROPHESIED” (Acts 19: 6):- became prophets and prophetesses on the spot. So also “Simon saw that through the laying on of the Apostles’ hands the Holy Ghost was given” (Acts 8: 18): that is, the effects of the communicated [Holy] Spirit were visible in the inspired utterances of its recipients.* So it had been from the first. For at the fountain-head of it all, at Pentecost, no sooner had the [Holy] Spirit fallen than “they began to speak with other tongues” (Acts 2: 4); and it was put beyond all doubt or challenge for the watching multitude because “every man heard them speaking in his own language” (Acts 2: 6).**

 

*“Although Simon had seen the miracles performed by Philip, yet this was the first time he had seen miraculous influences communicated from one person to another: Simon saw it; the effects of the communication, therefore, were visible, probably in the inspired utterances of the recipients. Simon would have no desire to purchase the sanctifying effects of the Spirit” (P. J. Cloag, D.D.).

 

** The sole example (so far as we know) of the laying on of hands without either the intention or the effect of miracle was the designation of Paul and Barnabas to missionary labours (Acts 13: 3); and here the Church, not the Apostles, laid hands on them: an example that may make such imposition of hands, meant merely to designate, innocuous in an age of non-inspiration.

 

 

Now we are confronted with the exceedingly grave historical fact that imposition of hands, in various ceremonies and functions all down the ages, has maintained the claim without the power. By the fourth century we find the complete absence of miracle combined with the assumption that the Holy Ghost had been transmitted by laid on hands. Augustine says:- “At the present time is it expected of any one of these on whom the hand is laid, that they may receive the Holy Ghost, that they should speak with tongues? Or, when we laid our hands on yonder candidates, did you each look to see whether they spoke with tongues? And was there any one of you so perverse as to say, when you saw they did not speak with tongues: ‘These have not received the Holy Ghost, for if they had received Him, they would speak with tongues, as was the case in those days.’?” Augustine’s almost scornful questions, betraying his own uneasiness, are manifestly a rhetorical device for concealing a flaw inevitably present to a scriptural onlooker; and all through the fifteen centuries that follow, the position, unrelieved by any appearance of substantiating miracle, has only hardened. Dr. Moberly, in his Bampton Lectures, says:- “Our Confirmation so differs from that of the Apostolic age that we do not look for the extraordinary gifts which the confirmed of that time enjoyed

 

 

Now this complete absence of the very proof which the Holy Ghost Himself commanded and gave, this absolute silence of the [Holy] Spirit supposed to be transferred, this entire disappearance of the very thing that was to be conferred - namely, the Holy Ghost working in manifested power - is fatal to the claim. If the ‘gifts’ are absent, the ‘gift’ cannot have been conferred: the technical catalogue of the Gifts (1 Cor. 12: 8-10) reveal them as miraculous,* and therefore if there be no miracle, there has been no miraculous Unction. Moreover, the absence of ocular proof has made possible rival claims to an imagined transmission which, by being mutually destructive, cancel out each other’s claims. For it is obvious that all competing formalisms must silence and destroy each other’s pretensions: rival ecclesiasticisms, all claiming ‘ordaining’ powers by imposition of hands, and each doubting, or wholly denying, the transmission of the [Holy] Spirit by any but themselves, cannot possibly be the channels of the Holy Ghost.** Without miracle there is no miraculous Unction.

 

* The wisdom of a Solomon, the knowledge of a Paul, the faith that transplants a mountain, are miracles, not graces; and few will care to deny the miraculous contents of ‘gifts of healings,’ ‘workings of miracles,’ ‘prophecy,’ ‘discernings of spirits,’ ‘tongues,’ and ‘interpretation of tongues.’ It has been the tragedy of exposition (in this sphere) that the terms have been watered down, against all Scripture use, in order to hide our poverty. It was a “manifestation of the Spirit” (1 Cor. 12: 7) - ‘a making visible’ (Liddell & Scott) - by which the Spirit made Himself audible (Acts 13: 2), and, at least at Pentecost, visible (Acts 2: 3), in supernatural actions always unmistakable to the senses and (often) an immediate conviction to the infidel (1 Cor. 14: 25). George Muller said correctly that he had the grace of faith, but not the gift of faith.

 

 

So, therefore, we have no alternative but to reject all ceremonies and experiences emanating from any quarter which claim to transmit the [Holy] Spirit without the Power. This manikin, this lay figure without life, is the very citadel of ecclesiastical pretension and usurped authority. Rome has foreseen the fatal flaw in the evidence; and, most characteristically, she meets it neither with argument nor with Scripture, but with anathema. The Council of Trent (Session xxiii.) declares:- “If anyone shall say, that, by sacred ordination the Holy Ghost is not given; and that the Bishops do thereby vainly say ‘Receive ye the Holy Ghost,’ let him be accursed.” Without despising historical succession, or assuming that the grace of God is necessarily spasmodic and spontaneous, and without denying that blessing may descend on a ceremony wholly mistaken in its phraseology, we rejoice to know - as history has proved past all question - that Divine Grace is not bound to rival Popes or mutually excommunicate Episcopates.* Moreover, in face of modern demonisms a stern negative is imperative for safety. It is for some psychic reason lying in physical contact - a law concerning the transmission of spirit unknown to us - that any touch of a demoniac involves acute danger; and the [regenerate] believer is most unwise who, for any reason whatsoever, allows hands to be laid on him by a ‘healer’ or a hypnotist or a medium or a speaker in ‘tongues Only with the restoration of the Apostles (if such ever occurs) can we submit to the Imposition of Hands. For a mechanical transmission is for ever impossible. “Even though a bishop,” says Cardinal Newman, “were to use the words, ‘receive ye the Holy Ghost,’ with little or no meaning, or a priest the consecrating words in the Eucharist, considering it only a commemoration of Christ’s death, or a deacon the water and the words in baptism, denying in his heart that it is regeneration; yet they may, in spite of their unbelief, be instruments of a power they know not of; and ‘speak not of themselves.’” Such mechanism (it needs no proof to show) is a travesty of Apostolical powers.**

 

 

* In the eyes of the Vatican the Archbishop of Canterbury is a layman, as to the High Anglican, Moravian and Methodist Bishops are no bishops at all, and so are incapable of transmitting the Holy Ghost.

 

** That the Most High is not dependent on a mechanical succession, nor  has appointed it, and that a God-created ministry can be wholly independent of historicity and ordination, is established by one exceedingly remarkable Scripture. “The house of Stephanas have set themselves to the ministry: I beseech you that ye be in subjection unto SUCH” (1 Cor. 16: 15): for Paul only confirms the ordination, but lifts it into a general principle. Dean Sranley’s translation runs thus - “They appointed themselves to the ministry of the saints; and I exhort you that ye also appoint yourselves to be under such

 

 

-------

 

 

Perhaps the closest approach to an on-fall of the Spirit in modern times lies in the experience of Charles Finney. “I found myself,” he says, “endued with such power from on high that a few words, dropped here and there to individuals, were the means of their immediate conversion. My words seemed to fasten like barbed arrows in the souls of men. They broke the heart like a hammer. Multitudes can attest this. Sometimes I would find myself, in a great measure, empty of this power. I would go out and visit, and find that I made no saving impression. 1 would exhort and pray, with the same result. I would then set apart a day for private fasting and prayer, fearing that this power had departed from me, and would inquire anxiously after the reason of this apparent emptiness. After humbling myself, and crying out for help, the power would return upon me with all its freshness. This has been the experience of my lifeBut such an experience is rare, if not unique; its effect, unlike that of the Scriptural gifts, was purely evangelistic; it is entirely personal, and unconnected with any kind of conferred favour; and it was devoid of all miracle. It is no more than the present mixed and secret agency of the Spirit raised to its maximum.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

12

 

POWER LOST AND RECOVERED + 2

 

 

 

A constant phase of to-day is the going down of leader after leader into a bankruptcy of power, or even into complete spiritual extinction: something hidden happens, of which none knows the secret but God, and there is a sudden fading of the old splendid glow.                  So Samson is perhaps the most vivid example in the Bible of giant power, accompanied by an utter unconsciousness of danger - always the greatest danger of all - sinking in a moment into total moral bankruptcy. Samson is an example etched in lightnings of what all of us may become: at first a spiritual giant; a doer of exploits vivid, dashing, marvellous; a solitary hero dominating a nation; a lonely warrior of God in his race and generation: then, a secret passion; a fearful public collapse; and only in the far sunset, a going out in a sudden burst of the old splendid power, after years of lost vision (the eyes put out) and a manacled life.

 

 

Samson is the summary of power resting on consecration; and his huge muscular strength is the Old Testament counterpart of spiritual dynamic in the New. For Samson was not born strong: apart from the Spirit of God his stature was no more colossal, nor his muscle iron, than any other man’s; but with him the on-fall of the Spirit was such, such was the clothing of the human with the naked power of the Holy Ghost, that one man - and that man unarmed - could rout three thousand. And the symbolism is extraordinarily striking. Unshorn locks falling down him picture the descent of the Spirit, drenching him as the sacred Oil did Aaron; seven locks (Judges 16: 19), the plenitude of power; and locks untouchable, as the God-given symbol of his Nazarite consecration and the sole secret of his strength. The Nazarite who put a razor to his head knew that he had lost his consecration. ‘Nazarite’ means ‘separated,’ separated to God, a man whose power dwells solely in his separation; and the power remains so long as (contact with a corpse being forbidden) he is ‘out of touch’ with a dead world. And the name ‘Samson’ means ‘the sun,’ or strength - the sun as it shineth in its strength; the chief receptacle and transmitter of the Light of the World.* So Samson was no mere prodigy of brute force, but, as a unique example of Holy Ghost power, the very choice of his weapons, ridiculously inadequate, designedly revealed a power purely of God.

 

* Our Lord’s sevenfold unction (Isa. 11: 2) in the perfect antitype of God’s deposited Light.

 

 

Now Delilah appears upon the scene. ‘Delilah’ - meaning ‘languishing,’ seductive - is the embodiment and summary of all that is fair covering all that is false. The Lion which Samson encountered and slew had nothing like the peril for him that Delilah had: it is safer to face open martyrdom than concealed lust: Delilah and Samson are always seen alone. A secret passion mastered and threw him. Delilah comes in many shapes:- impurity; drunkenness; notoriety; reputation; popularity; power; money: and where drink or fornication slays its hundreds, money or popularity slays its tens of thousands. Delilah is most dangerous when she is most concealed. Already, earlier, this fatal self-indulgence had been foreshadowed when Samson, a Nazarite, had eaten honey out of the carcase of a dead world he had overcome. Now another stage has been reached when, instead of using his power in routing God’s enemies, he begins displaying it at the bidding of a harlot world. On behalf of the Powers of Darkness behind her, who bribed her with about £620, Delilah now plies him, again and again, with the question of the source of his strength - “wherein his strength was great not that she might share it, but that she might steal it. No prayer; no alarm; no self-examination; no self-distrust; no self-denial: resting on a blind presumption of privilege, Samson confronts Delilah.

 

 

Now we get a parallel that could not be closer to the sapping seductions that bring down the loftiest spiritual characters with a crash. Three times Samson eludes the questioning of Delilah: three times she probes his secret, each time getting closer to its heart: yet all the time the power continues. God never leaves His worker at a first sin; but interposes delays, warnings, and opportunities of repentance; and may even continue to use him mightily.* Broken withes, snapt cords, a dragged frame prove that nothing is yet irrevocably gone. But each time, unheeding the red signals, Samson drew nearer betraying his trust, and each time drew nearer with a lie - ever skating on thin ice, as when he wound his hair about the beam that might, if sharp-edged, have severed it. All indulgence in sin is like feeding a tiger - each sop thrown has to be succeeded by a bigger. And all the time, beneath the mighty iceberg the warm waters of temptation, dallied with and encouraged, are eating away the foundations of the glittering pinnacles, until suddenly - without a moment’s warning - the huge berg gives one mighty heave, and is gone.

 

* It is a striking proof that the baptism of power (Acts 1: 8) is not primarily in intent, nor necessarily in effect, a transmission of sanctity. The idea, therefore, that the baptism of the Spirit produces an eradication of sin is a pure illusion. Corinth, the most miracle-gifted, was also the least sanctified Church.

 

 

For now that moment has arrived for Samson. What must never leave our memory is that, in exercising power, we are dealing with a Person, who will act as He chooses, and when He chooses, and may stop the power at any moment: and we must also remember that the Spirit in power (as distinct from the Spirit in regeneration) is granted to Samson, not on the ground that he is an Israelite, but that he is a Nazarite; and therefore that the power was not his inalienable possession, whether he used it or abused it, but was only lent to him for combating God’s enemies. The power seized him only when he was fighting the battles of God: rest, and we rust. But how solemn Samson’s ignorance of the Spirit’s departure! The machinery may still run for a little after the dynamo has ceased throbbing. God can come in earthquake, but He can leave in shoes of silk. “Samson wist not that the Lord had departed from him Faculties that get numbed to sin get numbed also to ‘sensing’ the Spirit. No outward event announced it; no great convulsion, no ringing alarum: while he was asleep the power departed. A Christian worker can flatter himself, in the midst of his lusts, that his power is as it was in his consecration; but in the agony of the supreme need of the power, with everything at stake, in full view of a lifework’s ruin, on the edge of a scandal to the world of the first magnitude, Samson shakes himself- and the power is gone. For alas, how keen is the world’s razor on the locks of consecration! Samson never shaved his locks; he allowed himself in company where, falling into profound slumber, they were shaved for him: he had power to keep out of Delilah’s company; but we can trifle once too often; we can sin-away our freedom; the tide may have ebbed beyond recall while we slept. Lock after lock falls, power ebbs with every slash, and Samson awakes to agony. A picture follows of almost intolerable pathos. God’s mighty judge, the supreme leader of the only people of God in the world at that moment, is filling the office of a public buffoon, and dancing, in blundering blindness, to make sport for a hating, scorning, laughing mob. Oh, the tragedy to which a backslider can come! “And Samson made sport before them” (Judges 16: 25).

 

 

But now there rises before us as supreme a beacon-light against despair in the child of God as perhaps the whole Bible   contains. God preaches hope where the devil preaches despair. “Howbeit the hair of his head began to grow again after he was shaven”: the thick shaggy locks - sign-manual of the Nazarite - slowly reappeared in the long agony of the lonely vigil in the prison in Gaza. “They that wait upon the Lord shall RENEW THEIR STRENGTH” (Isa. 40: 31): the broken consecration, which he realized had been his ruin, is now slowly restored: the controversy between God and his soul is over: the old power comes back with the old sanctity, and the old obedience. It is true that Samson’s eyesight was never restored. Through his eyes he had sinned, and through his eyes he is punished; and the sight is gone for life. There are scars that will never leave our backsliding souls: there are things we have lost - the freshness, the purity, the stainlessness, the blameless walk before men for a lifetime, which, in the nature of things, once lost, can never be restored; sin is always a horrible and a bitter thing, and it is always most dangerous. There are backsliders made permanent spiritual cripples by too prolonged a sojourn in the Prodigal’s Land. Nevertheless the shaggy locks that mean the power of the Holy Ghost can grow again; for the discipline of sorrow can be the restoration of power; and the fountain of restoration lies in a burst of prayer - the first mention of Samson praying since he named the fountain (Judges 15: 19). “And Samson called unto the Lord and said, O Lord God, remember me It is a prayer wrung from his very heart. He does not ask for the old life, or the old possibilities - those have gone never to return: nor does he plead the old consecration, for a razor has passed upon his head; and blinded eyes could no longer lead Israel’s hosts to battle: nay, he actually asks that God will not save his life by any miracle - “Let me die if only Thou wilt come back to me this once: “ONLY THIS ONCE, O GOD It is the cry of Paul a thousand years later:- “I hold not my life of any account, as dear unto myself, so that I may accomplish my course” (Acts 20: 24). Victory at the last is dearer to Samson than life itself: it is ruin by lust,* restoration by prayer, and victory by martyrdom.

 

* A razor could have slit Samson’s throat as easily as his locks: it is solemn to remember that a Spirit-forsaken backslider can be more valuable to Satan than a dead saint.

 

 

So we arrive at last at one of the most wonderful sunsets in Scripture. In the thrilling words of Napoleon: “There is time to win a victory before the sun goes down As soon as Samson can pray, he is the hero again; the strength he lost by sin he regains by prayer; and lo, the Spirit of God falls once more upon the wrecked life! “And he bowed himself with all his might” - it is the servant of God once more pouring his whole soul and strength into the work of God, using “the weapons of our warfare which are mighty before God to the casting down of strongholds” (2 Cor. 10: 4): “AND THE HOUSE FELL How marvellously God’s grace can retrieve the fearful error of a lifetime! The roof and galleries, crowded with their thousands, crash down upon the masses below: princes and priests, with the idol-cups to their lips, and the mockery of Jehovah in their songs, are snowed under by an avalanche of falling stone: a terrific crash, a fearful cry, and the temple is one vast sepulchre. His last heroism cost Samson his life, but he instantly takes his place in the Gallery of God’s Immortals (Heb. 11: 32): he stands once more, and for the last time, a giant among the enemies of God. “For the dead which he slew at his death were MORE than they which he slew in his life The fearfully overcome can become the mighty overcomer: Samson gains the supreme victory of his life after his great fall: the last evidence of strength was the greatest he ever displayed: the [Holy] Spirit was never more with him than in his final fight for God: he leapt into the Glory from the tragic spectacle of a public shame. “A troop shall overcome him: BUT HE SHALL OVERCOME AT THE LAST” (Gen. 49: 19).

 

 

-------

 

 

BURIED SEED

 

 

“Cast thy bread upon the waters: for thou shalt find it after many days” (Eccles. 11: 1).

 

 

“Except a grain of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth by itseld alone; but if it die, it beareth much fruit” (John 12: 24).

 

 

“Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, being patient over it, until it receive the early and latter rain” (Jas. 5: 7).

 

 

The Baptist mission in Teluga, South India, after fifteen years’ work with only 10 converts, it was decided in 1853, should be abandoned. Maps of the Mission stations hung upon the walls, and Teluga was marked by one solitary star, a lone star in all India. “And who,” exclaimed Dr. Edward Bright, pacing the platform in painful agitation, “shall write the letter telling that little church we have abandoned them?” It would have been his duty. Dr. F. S. Smith, the author of My Country, ’tis of Thee, who had taken no part in the debate, went home, and in the course of a sleepness night wrote the following poem:-

 

 

Shine on, Lone Star! I would not dim

The light that gleams with dubious ray;

The lonely Star of Bethlehem

Led on a bright and glorious day.

 

 

Shine on, Lone Star! In grief and tears

And sad reverses oft baptized;

Shine on amid thy sister spheres;

Lone stars in heaven are not despised.

 

 

Shine on, Lone Star! Who lifts his hand

To dash the earth so bright a gem,

A new ‘lost Pleiad’ from the band

That sparks in night’s diadem?

 

 

Shine on, Lost Star! Thy day draws near

When none shall shine more fair than thou;

Thou, born and nursed in doubt and fear,

Wilt glitter on Immanuel’s brow.

 

 

Shine on, Lost Star! Till earth’s redeem’d

In dust shall bid the idols fall;

And thousands, where thy radiance beam’d,

Shall crown the Saviour Lord of All.

 

 

At breakfast his host, Judge Ira Harris, a Judge of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, who was to preside at the morning session, asked Dr. Smith for his opinion. For answer he produced the pencilled slip of paper. Judge Harris read it, and put it in his pocked. He was a man of striking personality, and at the fateful meeting read this poem with much feeling. It shook the audience, and it is said men wept. A vision of hope dawned upon them as this prophetic utterance was spoken, and the Teluga Mission was saved. Instead of retreat advance was planned, and more men were sent out. A great mass movement crowned their faith - not immediately, but within a few years, and nine thousand converts were baptized in six weeks. Thirty years later the Ongole Church of 15,000 members was the largest Baptist church in the world. Now 70 odd years later, there are 193 Baptist churches with 75,000 members in the Teluga country, and an average of 3,000 baptism a year.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE LOST LEADER

 

 

Browning’s poem, though ment purely for the literary sphere, has an application most painful and accurate to the astounding bankruptcies in Christian leadership that are forcing themselves on our reluctant vision on every hand. We can but hope, with Browning, that, like Samson, some sunsets may yet prove more golden than their dawns.

 

 

 

Just for a handful of silver he left us,

Just for a riband to stick in his coat -

Found the one gift of which Fortune bereft us,

Lost all the others she lets us devote;

They, with the gold to give, doled him out silver:

So much was theirs who so little allowed;

How all our copper had gone for his service!

Rags - were they purple, his heart had been proud.

We that had loved him so, followed him, honoured him,

Lived in his mild and magnificent eye,

Learned his great language, caught his clear accents,

Made him our pattern to live and to die.

Shakespeare was of us, Milton was for us,Burns, Shelley,

were with us - they watch from their graves;

He alone breaks from the van and the freeman,

He alone sinks to the rear of the slaves!

 

 

We shall march prospering - not thro’ his presence:

Songs may impart us, - not from his lyre;

Deeds will be done - while he boasts his quiescence,

Still bidding crouch whom the rest bade aspire.

Blot out his name, then, record one lost soul more,

One task more declined, one more footpath untrod,

One more devil’s triumph and sorrow for angels,

One more wrong to man, one more insult to God.

Life’s night begins: let him never come back to us;

There would be doubt, hesitation, and pain;

Forced praise on our part - the glimmer of twilight,

Never glad confident morning again.

Best fight on well, for we taught him - strike gallantly,

Menace our heart ere we master his own;

Then let him receive the now knowledge, and wait us,

Pardoned in heaven, and first by the throne!*

 

 

* After his sharp controversy with George Whitefield , John Wesley said to a friend, - “I do not expect to see Mr Whitefield in heaven,” “Oh, Mr. Wesley,” his friend exclaimed, deeply shocked, “you do not expect to see him in heaven?” “No,” replied Wesley, “he’ll be too near the throne!” - Ed.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

13

 

THE FIRST RESURRECTION + 1

 

 

I

 

 

There is a general impression that the belief in the First Resurrection at a different time from that of the general resurrection rests solely on Revelation 20: 6. But this is a great mistake. Omitting the passages from the Old Testament Scriptures, sustained by the promises of which the ancient worthies suffered and served God in hope of ‘a better resurrection’ (Heb. 11: 35), our Lord makes a distinction between the resurrection which some shall be ‘accounted worthy to obtain’, and some not (Luke 20: 35). St. Paul says there is a resurrection ‘out from among the dead’ [see Greek ...] to attain which he strove with all his might as the prize to be gained (Phil. 3: 11). He also expressly tells us, that while as in Adam, all die, so in Christ shall all be made alive; yet it shall not be at once (1 Cor. 15: 22-24). It is particularly to be remarked that wherever the resurrection of Christ, or His people, is spoken of in Scripture, it is a ‘resurrection from, or from among, the dead’; and wherever the general resurrection is spoken of, it is the ‘resurrection of the dead This distinction, though preserved in many instances in the English translation, is too frequently omitted; but in the Greek the one is always coupled with the preposition, out of or from among, and the other is without the preposition; and in the Vulgate it is rendered by a mortuis, or ex mortuis, as distinct from esurrection mortuorum. In Romans 8: 11, ‘the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead it is ek vekwv, a mortuis. So in Romans 10: 7; Ephesians 1: 20; Hebrews 13: 20; 1 Peter 1: 3, 21. So Lazarus was raised (John 12: 1, 9). Our Lord, in His reply to the Sadducees, made the distinction between the general resurrection of the dead and the resurrection which some should be accounted worthy to obtain (Luke 20: 34, 35). St. Paul, when he spoke of a resurrection to which he strove and agonized to attain (Phil. 3: 8, 11), as if one preposition was not enough to indicate or emphasize his meaning, uses it doubled, ... [See Greek ...], resurrectionem, quae est ex mortuis - the special or eclectic resurrection, that one from the among the dead.

 

 

                                                                                                           J. A. SEISS, D.D.

 

 

II

 

 

The second resurrection will be general, universal, comprising both the righteous and the wicked; while the first will comprehend, - [know fully] - as the writer’s language seems to intimate, only saints and martyrs who have been specially faithful unto death. This distinction the writer has made prominent. He expressly assures us that the other dead would not be raised when the thousand years should commence, but only at the end of the world when all will be raised. The express contrast here made between the partial and the general resurrection, and the manner in which this contrast is presented, shew that the design is not to compare a spiritual with a physical resurrection, but to contrast the partial extent of the latter at the beginning of the Millennium, with its general or universal extent at the end of the world.

 

 

It is asked, “Whether all true Christians, and indeed all truly pious men of every age, who lived before the commencement of the Millennium will be raised from the dead at that at that period, or whether the Apocalypse affirms this only of Christian martyrs To this I answer briefly, that those “who are beheaded for the testimony of Jesus,” are clearly placed in high relief by the writer of the Apocalypse; but possibly he does not limit the promises merely to these. He may mean to include all who amid sufferings have been faithful and true to the doctrines and duties of a divine religion, in times of pressure. We cannot well doubt that he has specially in view the persecuted Christians of his day; but still may he be regarded as designating two classes of persons? Can he mean to be understood as confining his views only to literal and actual martyrs? And if faithful Christians in general we described by his language, then what forbids that all of these before the Millennium who have cherished the same spirit as the actual martyrs, served the same God, and possessed the same sympathies in respect to the prosperity and welfare of the church, should be included in the promises which he here holds out?

 

 

Is there not a distinction made by John between those who have periled their lives and suffered for their steadfast adherence to religion, and those who have been distinguished neither by active piety nor by suffering? Who will venture to answer with confident assurance, that there is not? The special object, in view of which the Apocalypse was written seems to point us to the class of martyrs and faithful confessors, as being the only ones intended to be included by the writer. In times of distressing and bloody persecution was the book written. Christians were to be consoled and fortified so as to meet the shock. Was it not to hold out high and peculiar rewards to those who endured to the end? It is difficult not to think this probable. And what is the peculiar reward of unshaken constancy and fidelity? A Part in ‘the first resurrection’. This is the natural and obvious solution of the case.

 

 

And does not Paul himself seem to say, that although he might possibly be a Christian, and attain to final happiness, yet he should lose a part in the first resurrection, if he should become slothful and remiss? He tells us that he had suffered the loss of all things, and counted them but dung, that he might know - [more intimately] - Christ and the power of His resurrection; if by any means he might attain to the resurrection of the dead (Phil. 3: 8-11). Did Paul, then, consider it a matter of doubt whether he should have a part in the final resurrection? This same apostle, who has so expressly taught us the resurrection of all, both of the righteous and of the wicked - did he doubt whether he could attain to this same resurrection? Surely not. Consequently his declaration, then and only then, seems to possess a full and energetic meaning, when we view him as declaring that a high and holy and vigorous contest with the powers of darkness must be carried on, in order to obtain a part in the first resurrection. So interpreted, the meaning of the passage stands out in bold relief.

 

 

All this seems rather to guide us to the conclusion that a distinction will be made among the pious themselves, at the - [time of their] - first resurrection. This is only carrying out the principle that those who possess five talents and improve them diligently, will be made rulers over five cities; and those who have two, over only two cities. ‘Si quomodo occurram ad resurrectionem, quae est ex mortuis’ If St. Paul had been looking only to the general resurrection, he need not have given himself any trouble, or made any sacrifice to attain to that; for to it, all, even Judas and Nero, must come; but to attain to the First Resurrection he had need to press forward for the prize of that calling. 

 

 

MOSES STUART, D.D.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE LAST LAP

 

 

Carry me over the long last mile

Man of Nazareth, Christ for me!

Weary I wait by Death’s dark stile,

In the wild and the waste, were the wind blows free;

And the shadows and sorrows come out of my past,

Look keen through my heart,

And will not depart,

Now that my poor world has come out of my past,

Lord, is it long that my spirit must wait?

Man of Nazareth, Christ for me! -

Deep is the stream, and the night is late,

And grief blinds my soul, that I cannot see,

Speak to me, out of the silences, Lord,

That my spirit may know,

As forward I go,

Thy pierced hands are lifting me over the ford!

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

14

 

THE RESURRECTION FROM

AMONG THE DEAD +3

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

We are now 1930 years nearer than the Church has ever been to the breaking of tombs, and the emergence of saints; and if the problems that cluster round that enormous event were always acute and urgent, ten times more acute and urgent are they now - [in 2024]. Since the Wilderness is symbolic of our pilgrimage, and Canaan of the Holy Land, the passage of Jordan is a kindergarten of resurrection and rapture; and “after three days” - the Lord rose after three days - the Ark (always a symbol of the Incarnate Christ) crossed Jordan; such of Israel as did enter the Land were to follow at a commanded distance of “about two thousand cubits” - the dispensation’s two thousand years are fast slipping out; and the urgent direction of Joshua [Jesus], is “SANCTIFY yourselves, for to-morrow the Lord will do wonders among you” (Joshua 3: 5) - the era of miracle returns. Martin Anstey’s computation, the best yet made, closes the 2,000 Christian years in 1958; * and when the unknown length of the intervening Parousia is allowed for - probably not less than seven years, and possibly many more* - the command comes home with tremendous force, SANCTIFY YOURSELVES.

 

* Publishing in 1913 he concludes thus:- “Yet 45 years, and the millennium of the world’s history will be fulfilled, and the seventh millennium, ushered in” the Sabbatic Millennium of Heb. 4: 9. into which (says the inspired writer) we must labour to enter.

 

[* NOTE: “After two days” - that is, after two thousand years {2 Peter 3: 8} - “he will revive us” {i.e. the nation of Israel}: “on the third day” - {probably after 2.000 years from the date of our Lord’s crucifixion and premature death} - “he will raise us up, and we shall live before him. 3 And let us know, let us follow on to know the LORD; his going forth is sure as the morning: and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter rain that watereth the earth:” (Hosea 6: 2, 3, R.V.]

 

 

UNCERTAINTY

 

 

For the first certainty on which we plant our feet as on rock is that Paul, when he speaks of the [see Greek word ...] is not sure of sharing the resurrection of which he speaks, whatever that resurrection may be. The phrase he selects puts it beyond all dispute or doubt. “If BY ANY MEANS” if possibly (H. A. W. Meyer); if somehow (Moule); if anyhow (Eadie); si forte (Lange); if in any way (Bengel) - “I may attain unto the resurrection from the dead” (Phil. 3: 11); “is used when an end is proposed, but failure is presumed to be possible” (Alford).* So Bishop Ellicott comments:- “The idea of an attempt is conveyed, which may or may not be successful.” And Bishop Lightfoot:- “The Apostle states not a positive assurance, but a modest hope.” For Paul crams the words with studied difficulty: ‘if’ it is hypothetical; ‘by any means’ - it is precarious; ‘I attain’ - it is a golden possibility.

 

* An instructive parallel occurs in Acts 27: 12:- “If by any means they might attain to Phenice”; which, in the sequel, they did not reach.

 

 

SPIRITUAL RESURRECTION

 

 

The next certainty on which we can rest negatively excludes a mistaken interpretation. ‘Resurrection’ is sometimes use spiritually, to picture a rising out of the death of sin, and from a world of the dead: but this cannot be the meaning of Paul here; for spiritual resurrection, symbolized by baptism, which therefore occurs after the spiritual rising has occurred, Paul, and those to whom he wrote, had already experienced. “Having been buried with Christ in baptism, wherein ye were also RAISED with Him” (Col. 2: 12). He who is unrisen out of the grave of sin is no child of God at all. For Paul, now on his last lap, to hope that some day he might succeed in escaping from among the spiritually dead, or, from the deathly sleep of backsliding, were absurd. “Any reference here to a merely ethical resurrection,” as Bishop Ellicott says, “is wholly out of the question

 

 

GENERAL RESURRECTION

 

 

The next certainty on which we plant our feet as on rock: is a negative no less important and obvious. Paul’s uncertainty of sharing in this resurrection necessarily excludes resurrection in general; since the most wicked man, without his choice and against his will, must rise from the dead. “ALL that are in the tombs says our Lord, “shall come forth” (John 5: 28): they “that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to shame and everlasting contempt” (Dan. 12: 2). “As in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall ALL be made alive” (1 Cor. 15: 22). Much more is it inevitable that every believer must leave his [grave or] tomb. “This is the will of him that sent me, that of ALL that which he hath given me, I should raise it up at the last day” (John 6: 39). For Paul, the past-master - [by his divine given understanding] - of resurrection truth, and the chief protagonist of resurrection’s universality, to doubt his rising from the grave, or to leave it open to question, would be an overthrow of the Faith, and a denial of his Lord.*

 

 

SELECT RESURRECTION

 

 

But Paul defines so exactly what he means as to place the truth, finally, beyond all doubt. “If by any means he says, “I may attain unto the out-resurrection, that which is from among the dead”: ‘an out-resurrection, not out of the earth’ (Lange), but “out from among dead ones”: “that is, as the context suggests, the first resurrection” (Ellicott). It was exactly this which puzzled the first disciples when Christ foretold His rising out of (ek) the dead, for - like Martha (John 11: 24) - they had never conceived of any emergence from the grave except the general rising of the mass of mankind: “questioning among themselves what the rising again from the dead should mean” (Mark 9: 10). “The first resurrection is of necessity a resurrection from among the dead” (Govett): it is a prior emergence from the tombs: it necessitates a later resurrection of those left; “and the rest of the dead LIVED NOT until the thousand years should be finished” (Rev. 20: 5). Thus all difficulty attending Paul’s - [present-day assumed] - uncertainty vanishes the moment we realize that the ... [out-resurrection] is one of the golden prizes for which God summons us to compete. As Dr. J. Hutchison says:- “The allusion is undoubtedly not to the general resurrection of the dead. All must attain unto that. No striving is needed thereto. It stands fast in the decrees of heaven, and none can fall short of it or frustrate it. What is referred to here is that which is attained after danger and toil, and attained as a blissful reward. It is what is elsewhere called ‘a better resurrection’ (Heb. 11: 35); the resurrection of the just (Luke 14: 14; Acts 4: 2); ‘the first resurrection’ (Rev. 20: 5). It is the resurrection par eminence

 

 

 

 

A PRIZE

 

 

So we reach a revelation of extraordinary importance for every one of us, strangely overlooked, or even denied, in our evangelical and prophetical theology. “The doctrine here taught is that the blessedness of the saints at the resurrection is so great that we should be content to use any means and run any hazards to attain it” (T. Manton, D.D.). Paul’s eagerness to emphasize his own uncertainty is almost passionate. “Not that I have already attained” - attained, that is, the title to the first resurrection* for no one would imagine that he had attained it in the Roman prison - “or am already made perfect: brethren, I count not myself” - whatever others may think of me, or of themselves -“to have apprehended** If by these words Paul means that he, and with him all [regenerate] believers, are sure of the resurrection of which he speaks, then words are chosen to conceal their meaning, and to express the opposite of what they say: on the contrary, Paul, guided by the [Holy] Spirit, solves the problem for us all by lodging it exclusively in himself; for it needs no arguing that if not Paul, then none of us. Paul the aged, Paul the Apostle, Paul (we had almost said) the matchless, not only thought he had not attained, but says by inspiration that he had not - “I AM NOT already made perfect”: not until the executioner’s block was actually in sight, on which he was to be “poured out as a drink offering” (2 Tim. 4: 6), did he know, as a [Christian] martyr, his crown secure. Therefore, until then, all converges on a resolve of passionate intensity, in which for all saints, and for all time, the Apostle blazes the trail. “ONE THING I DO, FORGETTING THE THINGS WHICH ARE BEHIND, AND STRETCHING FORWARD TO THE THINGS WHICH ARE BEFORE, I PRESS ON TOWARD THE GOAL UNTO THE PRIZE OF THE HIGE CALLING OF GOD IN CHRIST JESUS***

 

* “Jus ad resurrectionem beatam” (Grotius).

 

** “I, emphatic: he evidently alludes to some whom he wishes to warn by his example” (Alford). So Bishop Wordsworth:- “The divine Apostle himself, even at this late period of his Apostolic career, does not feel absolutely confident that he himself will attain to the glory of the Resurrection of the just; and he disavows the notion of being supposed to ‘have already apprehended.’ Cf. 1 Cor. 9: 27. It was not until on the eve of his martyrdom for Christ that he could exclaim, as he then did, ‘Henceforth there is laid up for me the Crown.” For homiletical purposes Dr. J. Lyth puts it thus:- “The [see Greek word ...] is distinguished from the resurrection of the wicked (1) by its glory (Dan. 12: 2); (2) its precedence (1 Cor. 15: 23); (3) its results (John 5: 29). It is an object of Christian ambition - requiring (1) faith, (2) consecration, (3) effort. It will amply repay every sacrifice of (1) self-gratification, (2) earthly advantage, (3) life

 

*** ‘The call heavenward’ (Lightfoot); the up-call; “come up hither” (Rev. 4: 1) out of an empty tomb. John when thus called, had fallen “as one dead and had been set back upon his feet by the voice of the Son of God. Believers who deny that there is any such conditional sanctity have a startling disillusionment ahead; nor is it harsh to believe that many prophetical teachers have a grave report to give to their Lord for a denial so dogmatic in its certitude as to mislead countless saints. False confidence is a sweetsmelling flower which holds the worm of an unguarded walk.

 

 

THE FIRST RESURRECTION

 

 

But the truth is not made to rest on this single Scripture. By two or three witnesses, the Most High has said, shall every word be established; and our Lord and John are joined with Paul in a consentient testimony that for the first resurrection, which is a state, rather than an act, personal sanctity is our bridge also across Jordan. Thus the Saviour, identifying the First Resurrection and the [Millennial] Kingdom, says of those who share it:- “They are ACCOUNTED WORTHY to attain to that age, and the resurrection FROM the dead” (Luke 20: 35). Lazarus enjoyed a resurrection, but not the resurrection. The First Resurrection is a state that includes an act; while such a resurrection as Lazarus’s is an act that excludes a state. The word for ‘worthiness’ ([see the Greek ...]) is never once used of imputed worthiness, but always and only of personal fitness, personal sanctity. Moreover, it is an added weight that the verb in its intensified form - to be accounted thoroughly worthy - is applied in every case of reward: to escape by [select] rapture (Luke 21: 36 [Cf. Rev: 3: 10, R.V.]); to participation in the First - [and select] - Resurrection (Luke 20: 35); and to entrance into the [Millennial] Kingdom (2 Thess. 1: 5); as the qualifying sanctity for all the great prizes of God. So the ground on which this state (not act) is entered the Apocalypse also reveals:- “Blessed and HOLY is he that hath part in the first resurrection: they shall reign with Christ a thousand years” (Rev. 20: 6). [Christian] Martyrs also, so keen were they on an emptying grave, - [when Christ will return] - refused any form of deliverance, much less recanted, in order to prove the fidelity without which (for so their action proved they believed) there can be no ‘better’ resurrection (Heb. 11: 35). So Paul’s words reveal the straight path to the empty grave, as the fellowship of His sufferings.

 

 

A POSTSCRIPT

 

 

The [Holy] Spirit, foreseeing a general lapse from the Church’s creed of this unpalatable but sharply tonic truth, closes with a gentle remonstrance and counsel. “Let us therefore as many as be perfect be thus minded; and if in anything y are otherwise minded” - believing that there is no such ‘prize’ in the Gospel, or that any particular believer has already won it, or that it has been received in the ‘gift’ of Eternal Life, or that it is won with ease and without undying effort, or that, by becoming sinless, we can be assured of it, or that our session with Christ in the heavenlies involves priority of rising* - “even this shall God reveal unto you: ONLY” - as a vital condition of a fuller revelation - “whereunto we have already attained, by that same rule let us walk.” Never falter from following the highest light that you have.

 

* “The First Resurrection is a reward for obedience rendered after the acceptance of [initial] salvation, and Paul knew not the standard which God had fixed in His own purpose” (G. H. Pember). Tertullian tells us that the Church of his age prayed for a share in the First Resurrection. “Many, even of the ancients, have admitted this first resurrection. ‘Within an age of a thousand years,’ says Tertullian, ‘is concluded the resurrection of the saints, who rise again at an earlier or a later period, according to their merits’” (Bengel)

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

Bishop Lightfoot, that master of paraphrase, thus summarizes the passage:- “Do not mistake me, I hold the language of hope, not of assurance. I have not yet reached the goal: I am not yet made perfect. But I press forward in the race eager to grasp the prize, forasmuch as Christ also has grasped me. My brothers, let other men vaunt their security. Such is not my language. I do not consider that I have the prize already in my grasp. This, and this only, is my rule. Forgetting the land-marks already passed, and straining every nerve and muscle in the onward race, I press forward ever towards the goal that I may win the prizePaul - [God’s inspired APOSTLE] - could say, “There is laid up for me the crown” only when he could say:- “I have finished the [race] course So Dr. A. B. Simpson’s word becomes very suggestive:- “In the public arena where men contended in the race it was at the home stretch, when the goal was in full view, that the greatest efforts were made both by the competitors, and those that encouraged them from the galleries, and there was special signal set up at the point where the races turned into the home stretch, on which the letters were emblazoned, ‘Make Speed’.”

 

 

-------

 

 

THE RESURRECTION

 

 

To me, the central point is the Resurrection of Christ, which I believe. Firstly, because it is testified by men who had every opportunity of seeing and knowing and whose veracity - [i.e., ones ‘truthfulness and accuracy’] - was tested by the most tremendous trials, both of energy and endurance, during long lives. Secondly, because of the marvellous effort it had upon the world. As a moral phenomenon, the spread and mastery of Christianity is without a parallel. I can no more believe that colossal moral effects lasting for 2000 years can be without a cause than I can believe that the various motions of the magnet are without a cause, though I cannot wholly explain them. To anyone who believes the Resurrection of Christ, the rest presents little difficulty. No one who has that belief will doubt that those who were commissioned by Him to speak - Paul. Peter, Mark, John - carried a divine message.

 

The MARQUESS OF SAILSBURY

 

 

-------

 

 

THE OUTLOOK OF THE HOUR

 

 

THE MILLENNIUM

 

 

The hope of the visible coming of Christ and of the Millennium appears so early that it may be questioned whether it ought not to be regarded as an essential part of the Christian religion: it was inseparably connected with the Gospel itself. - HARNACK

 

 

CHILIASM

 

 

It is a decisive proof of its truth that the two epochs of the Church in which millennarianism has most flourished are the two purest epochs (since the Apostles) that the Church has ever known. “In all the works of the first two centuries,” says Dr. Gieseler, “millennarianism is so prominent that we cannot hesitate to consider it as universalJustin, writing at the time of Papias, says that it was the general faith of all orthodox Christians, and that only the Gnostics did not share it (Hagenbach). Origen, at the end of the third century - a spiritist and a Universalist - was the first to attack what men who had seen the Apostles universally affirmed.

 

 

MODERN MILLENNARIANISM

 

 

The Reformation restored the truth. “That the Thousand Years were to be reckoned from the birth of Christ,” says Hengstenberg, a hostile but a truthful witness, “was the view which, through the authority of Augustine, was the prevailing one during the whole of the Middle Ages; but since Bengel, Chiliasm (the doctrine of our Lord’s reign on earth for 1,000 years) obtained an almost universal diffusion throughout the Church.” Since the Reformation Dr. Whitby (two centuries ago) - he himself calling it ‘a new hypothesis’ - was the first to deny the Millennial Reign, and to preach the world’s conversion by the Church; and Dr. Whitby died an Arian, having abandoned belief in any millennium whatsoever.

 

 

THE GREEK CHURCH

 

 

The Second Advent is still the official creed of the Greek Church. Its Larger Catechism says: “Will Jesus Christ soon come to judgment? We know not. Therefore we should live so as to be always ready. Are there not, however, revealed to us some signs of the nearer approach of Christ’s coming? In the word of God certain signs are revealed, as the decrease of faith and love among men, the abandoning of iniquity and calamities, the preaching of the Gospel to all nations, and the coming of Antichrist.”

 

 

THE ROMAN CHURCH

 

 

The Church of Rome, which rose on the ruins of Millennial truth, and the temporal power of which is its supplanting counterfeit, naturally burkes it, as the Universe (July 12, 1920) has just said. “The Church [of Rome] has never decided anything definite about the interpretation of the texts in Scripture concerning the supposed ‘Millennium.’ Some of the early Fathers believed in it. St. Augustine, however, interprets the first resurrection as referring to baptism, the sabbath of a thousand years as signifying eternal life, number one thousand is expressing perfection. Most Catholics adopt a similar explanation, though a few theologians in the last century continued to hold a modified ‘Millennium.’” The name of Cardinal Billot, who recently resigned the cardinalate so as to await the Lord’s return in befitting lowliness, had for two years previously disappeared from the list of dignitaries daily visiting the Pope.

 

 

MODERNISM AND THE ADVENT

 

 

It is well to realize that shifts to which doubters are reached. “In regard to our Lord’s eschatology,” says Dr. W. B. Selbie (Christian World, July 25, 1929), “it seems quite obvious that much of the language which is put into his mouth is rather that of Evangelists than of the Master Himself, though there can be very little doubt that He did often speak in eschatological terms.” That is, we escape pronouncing our Lord guilty of a blend of fact and fiction only by convicting Apostle and Prophets of forgery. The Dean of St. Paul’s characteristically, goes further. “I find it difficult,” says Dr. Inge, “without making too sharp a separation between the moral and intellectual sides of our nature, to reconcile the absolute sinlessness of Christ with the deep-seated delusion about the approaching end of the world.” But Baron Von Hugel excels them all “At bottom,” he says, “these poignant difficulties of the Second Advent rise the problem, not merely of Jesus’ Divinity, or, at least, of His Inerrancy, even with regard to matters of directly religious import, but primarily of the soundness and sanity of His human mind.” It is very significant that, as the Gnostics were the first to deny the Millennial Kingdom, so, as the Gnostic Apostasy approaches (1 Tim. 4: 3), already there is a like total denial by all modernists.

 

 

SCIENCE AND THE ADVENT

 

 

Yet men of the utmost distinction in Science and in the judiciary have held this faith; as Lord Kelvin, and Lord Cairns, one of the ablest minds that have occupied the woolsack. The objection of Science qua science is obvious. “If the world,” says Mr. Charles Singer, “which had been created was to come to an end, a conception of the destruction of the elements themselves must be adopted. ‘The day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up’ (2 Pet. 3: 10). So long as that idea was prominent in men’s minds there could be no serious attention paid to phenomena. ‘The day of the Lord’ rang the death-knell to science

 

 

THE ALTERNATIVE

 

 

The only alternative possible to a Christian is embodied in a manifesto issued during the general election by Mr. A. D. Belden, Dr. Herbert Gray, Dr. W. E. Orchard, and Mr. Rhondda Williams:- “As Christians, we believe in the regeneration of Society as well as the regeneration of individuals, and Labour seems to us to be the only party - [in 1929 / 1930] - which shares this ideal with us But Church leaders who are thus pledging the Churches to the wholly impossible task of the social and political regeneration of the world forget that the world, with roused expectations, will press for the redemption of the pledge, and the Church, facing at last an exasperated humanity, will find herself in a worse plight than when, in her unworldliness, she was merely an object of contempt. In a symposium of Labour leaders throughout the world, Mr. J. M. Mawser says:- “Once the Church’s social creed is announced, little is done to make it effective. If the workers had the same faith in the Church that they have in the Bible, there would not be half enough Churches in the country to hold them. In organized labour’s efforts to have humane legislation enacted, may I ask where the Church was

 

 

ANARCHY

 

 

It requires great credulity, a faith far more difficult than Second Advent faith, to suppose that the anarchic ferment now raging in huge races of the earth, such as the Mongol and the Slav, will allow - what a milder past never allowed - the permeation of the world by the teaching of the Nazarene. “People in ever-increasing numbers,” says Mr. J. P. Thompson, national organizer of the Industrial Workers of the World, “refuse to believe fairy-tales of Gods and devils at war - one sitting on a throne in heaven, the other on a throne in hell. Most members of the ruling classes pretend to believe for social and business reasons. They are still savage enough to try to change man’s hope of immortality into an instrument of plunder, and they will continue to try as long as it pays. You ask what we of Labour think of you? We are horrified - horrified at the unnecessary poverty and misery and slavery in the world, horrified at you and your savage Gods - and we are determined to drive all of you from your thrones.”

 

 

THE KINGDOM

 

 

All other religions have their Golden Age in the past: God lodges His in the future. For indeed man’s Age began with gold, but it ends in mire (Dan. 2: 32). It is unfortunate that the Church of Christ has made the ever-blessed Kingdom of Grace, a secret out of the eternal ages, to obscure, and even obliterate, the coming restoration of the world to God. But a thousand alarums would now wake the sleeping soul.

 

 

The grace of God is free even to the vilest sinners; but the thrones of the Millennial Age are won by sacrifice, service, and victorious achievement,” - A. B. SIMPSON, D.D.

 

 

-------

 

 

Lead us, brother, where the light is;

Cast no shadow on the way:

Know we too well where the night is -

Lead us to the open day!

 

 

Not to grope, or guess thy mission;

Not to falter in thy speech;

Thing the supra-sensual vision,

Thine the more than mental reach!

 

 

We, who face through toil and sorrow,

come with hearts od sin and care;

We would know about the morrow -

Is there satisfaction there?

 

 

Lead us brother, bravely daring

Thou thyself the narrow road;

Thou diurnal trials sharing -

Show us how to trust thy God!

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

15

 

THE SPIRITS IN PRISON

 

 

 

There have been some marvellous preachings in a supernatural setting. It must have been a strange sight when Noah, with warning on his lips and fear in his heart, laid plank on gopher plank, while the gazing crowd, among whom mingled the Nephilim, laughed and jeered, and no ripple yet ruffled the ocean. It must have been still stranger to see Elijah, in the midst of prophets slashed and bleeding in demonic frenzies, making the great appeal, and the sudden lightning fall. Still more strange, though less externally dramatic, must have been Paul, clanking chains, as he preached a full gospel to the Antichrist (Nero) himself, with the Lord invisibly standing - so awful was the power of darkness beside him in the dock. But far exceeding all in wonder is the Lord Jesus Himself, descending into the Underworld and traversing the gulf impassable to all else, as He brings the glad news of Calvary to spirits dungeoned in opaque darkness.

 

 

For the Son of God, becoming incarnate, descended as heaven’s missionary to a lower world; and He was no sooner dead than He descends, again as heaven’s missionary, to a world still lower. “Being put to death in the flesh, but quickened in the spirit”; quickened, for the holy dead are normally quiescent (1 Sam. 28: 15); “in which also” - that is, disembodied - “he went” - left the cross, and travelled across the gulf of the worlds - “and preached unto the spirits in prison” (1 Pet. 3: 19). Now we know where our Lord went at death. “The Son of man shall be three days and three nights IN THE HEART OF THE EARTH” (Matt. 12: 40): “He descended Paul says, “into the lower parts of the earth” (Eph. 4: 9); and He himself says in the Psalm:- “MY life draweth nigh unto Sheol: thou hast laid me in the LOWEST Pit” (Ps. 88: 6). And it is exactly in the lowest plateau of ‘Hades’ - known in the Classics as ‘Tartarus’- that the Apostle, actually naming the place, locates the Noahic Angels. “God spared not angels when they sinned, but cast them down to TARTARUS” (2 Pet. 2: 4). So also Solomon says:- “The Rephaim are in the depths of Sheol” (Prov. 9: 18).*

 

* This passage of mystery may illuminate a passage of still greater mystery. Of Antichrist descending to the underworld (like Christ) after assassination we read:- “Sheol from beneath [Tartarus] is moved to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the Rephaim for thee, even all the chief ones [satyrs] of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations. All they shall answer and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as us? art thou become like unto us?” (Isa. 14: 9). Their greeting seems to imply that the Seventh Emperor is one of themselves - born of the latter-day Nephilim.

 

 

Therefore our Lord, possessed of the keys both of Abaddon and Sheol (Rev. 1: 18), and so “free * among the dead” (Ps. 88: 5), with a passport of entrance everywhere arrives among a group of captive angels. “He preached unto the imprisoned spirits”; that is, spirits put in a prison, not in a park (paradise), after death: for, as the Apostle says later:- “God cast them down to Tartarus, and committed them to pits of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment” (2 Pet. 2: 4).** Their imprisonment in dungeons differentiates this class of spirits from “the hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places” (Eph. 6: 12) against whom we wrestle. Even demons on earth, so far from being in chains, or in the Abyss, emit to Christ the one cry not to send them thither (Luke 8: 31); nor does He: nor was their liberty in any way hampered or curtailed, save, for the dispossession. Jude’s words are still more explicit:- “And angels which kept not their principality” - the Satanic angels have never renounced their principality - “but left their proper habitation”*** - none of Satan’s hosts have abandoned their heavenly habitat as ‘powers of the air’ - “he hath kept in everlasting bonds” - so far from being in chains, it is not till the Second Advent that Satan is manacled (Rev. 20: 3) - “under darkness unto the judgment of the great day” (Jude 6). These angels fell through the lust of the eyes, whereas the earlier angels fell through the pride of life (1 Tim. 3: 6).

 

 

* Septuagint, [see Greek word ...]

 

** “The term selected for the ‘darkness,’ occurring only here and in verse 17, and in Jude 6 and 13, means the densest, blackest darkness, and is used in Homer of the nether world” (Prof. S. D. F. Salmond, D.D.). One reading ‘chains of darkness’ - implies that the blinding blackness is the chain, a fireless dark: whereas, in the very next verse (Jude 7), human Sodomites are suffering ‘fire’; nor is darkness stated of Dives, whose flame enlightens as well as torments. Jude, however, makes it clear that they are also manacled. It is probable that it is in these isolated dungeons of Tartarus that Satan himself, later (Rev. 20: 3), is enchained.

 

*** “A descent to a different sphere of being is intended indicated” (Salmond): “obscurely indicated in Genesis 6: 2” (Alford).

 

 

But the imprisoned spirits to whom our Lord preaches - the article before ‘spirits’ implies that the Saviour proclaimed the message to all of that class (Govett) - are confined exclusively to Noah’s day: “spirits in prison, which aforetime were disobedient when the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah”; “for God spared not angels when they sinned, but preserved Noah” (2 Pet. 2: 4). The Apostle Jude locks together the facts with rivets of steel:- “even as Sodom and Gomorrah in like manner with these [angels] gave themselves over to fornication, having gone after STRANGE FLESH” (Jude 7). So Paul also summarizes (1 Tim. 3: 16) the ‘mystery of godliness’ in the marvellous drama between Bethlehem and Olivet thus:- “God manifested in the flesh” - from Bethlehem to Calvary; “justified in the spirit” - accounted righteous, while disembodied, because the sin-Substitute exhausted the sin-penalty, yet remained spotless; “SEEN OF ANGELS” - in Tartarus, where the post-Pentecostal gospel was first announced by an Evangelist who so enlightened the darkness that they saw Him;* “preached among the nations” - starting with the many-tongued evangel of Pentecost; “believed on in the world” - from the cohort of Roman soldiers (Matt. 28: 54) outward; “received up in glory” - from Olivet.

 

* It was no ‘mystery’ for the Saviour to be seen by the angel-guards of Sheol, or the shining attendants at the Tomb.

 

 

So now the reason of the visit, steeped in mystery, but still more steeped in grace, discloses itself. “For unto this end was the gospel preached even unto the dead” - this, the sole group of the dead to whom the Gospel has ever been preached, for reasons as peculiar as the occasion was unique - “that they might be judged AS MEN in the flesh” (1 Pet. 4: 6). Only the Dead can preach to the dead; and these who had drawn on man’s doom with his flesh, a merciful Incarnation necessarily brings within reach of Bethlehem and Calvary. Such is the unity of all flesh, and such the assumption of flesh by Deity in the Incarnation, that not only all flesh leaves the tomb with Christ (1 Cor. 15: 22), but, because all flesh was represented on Calvary, all flesh is salvable; and the Lord speeds with the glad tidings to the dungeons of Tartarus. “Beautiful it is to see that so great is the love of God to man that, since these angels had put themselves into the place of man, the mercy designed for Adam’s race embraces them also” (Govett).*

 

* Satan’s spirit-forces have no gospel preached to them: “the demons also believe, and SHUDDER” (Jas. 2: 19).

 

 

Nor are we left in doubt of the fruits of the glorious embassage. “For unto this end was the gospel preached even unto the dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, BUT LIVE ACCORDING TO GOD IN THE SPIRIT” (1 Pet. 4: 6). For it was the Gospel that was preached. “It cannot be that the most merciful Saviour would have visited souls irretrievably lost merely to upbraid them and to enhance their misery” (B. C. Caffin). Nor is the issue left in any doubt. Where the Lord is the Evangelist, and the Gospel is the message, the purpose at once becomes the issue. As Dean Alford phrases it:- “that they might be judged [or be in the state of the completed sentence on sin, which is death after the flesh] according to [as] man as regards flesh, but [notwithstanding] might live [pres.; of a state continue] according to God [a life with God, and divine] as regards the spirit*

 

* It is probable that these are the Angels saints will judge (1 Cor. 6: 3). The gigantic proportions of Nephilim races are given in Deuteronomy 2: 10, 11 and 3: 11.  But they appear to have been no less gigantic in achievement. “The roots of the Greek ... have, however, no reference to great stature, but point to something very different, the word is merely another form of [see Greek...] ‘earth-born,’ the Titans, sons of Coelus and Terra” (G. Pember). On the mystery of their pro-creation we must remember that we know nothing whatever about Angels except what Scripture tells us, and Scripture tells us this. It was a golden answer that Mr. Spurgeon gave to a student bringing Bible difficulties:- “Young man, you must be content to allow God to say some things that you cannot understand

 

 

Thus the solitary Scripture stronghold, the apparently impregnable fortress of the Second Chance, is blown up, and its foundation left razed and desert. Jerome, Ambrose, and Augustine - together with countless moderns - regard this as a post-mortem opportunity of which some of the unholy dead, to whom Christ preached, availed themselves. It is the tragic mirage of an ocean where there is no water. The deep major chord of Holy Scripture responds in the note of eternal doom:- “It is appointed unto men once to die, and after this cometh JUDGMENT” (Heb. 9: 27).*

 

 

* It is equally manifest that, since the evangel is to angels only, the whole edifice of Purgatory as built on this Scripture tumbles into dust. It is amazing that even Calvin imagines that the Lord preached to the saved dead, as well as the unsaved.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

16

 

THE SONS OF GOD IN GENESIS SIX + 1

 

 

 

Who were these “sons of God Commentators in general reply, the children of the race of Seth, who were eminently holy. And who were the “daughters of men They answer again, the apostate race of Cain. But who told them the race of Cain was apostate, and the race of Seth holy? It is mere hypothesis, to get rid of a difficulty. Have we ground from Scripture for believing that children of a father must be pious, much more that a whole race should be so? Or have we any warrant from the sacred oracles for believing that the children of an ungodly parent must needs be all wicked, much more an entire race?

 

 

Again, how is it discovered, that the race of Cain and that of Seth kept themselves entirely distinct? A hypothetic basis again! And why were the children of Seth called the “sons of God Commentators return for answer, that it is the general term for professors of the true religion; and that it is used in opposition to those who are men of a fallen and depraved nature. But was not Seth also of a corrupt and fallen nature? The Scripture affirms it directly of him. “And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son, in his own likeness, after his own image; and called his name Seth” (Gen. 5: 3). How, then, is it said to be here used as a term of contradistinction, if both the “sons of God” and sons of men were partakers alike of the fallen and corrupt nature? Was not Seth a son of man or of Adam, as well as Cain? But the term “sons of God” signifies the professors of a true faith in opposition to those who do not. This requires proof. Shall we say that at so early an age, ere yet even the promise to Abraham was granted, and his seed were taken into covenant with God, the glorious title of ‘sons of God’ was bestowed on the professors of true religion? This is the last term of blessedness that the Gospel has bestowed on the Christian. “Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the ‘sons of God’!” are the words of St. John, expressing the last result of the Gospel. Nay more, the words of the Saviour intimate that it is not fully applicable even to the true believers in himself till after resurrection and redemption of the body: for it is then only that they will “die no more, but be equal to the angels, and be the children of God, being the children of the resurrection In which words it is highly observable that the Redeemer quotes the title children, or “sons of God as belonging primarily and of right to the angels, and as bestowed upon us only when we become equal to them. And St. Paul, arguing respecting the law, declares that those who were under it were slaves, not sons; nor could any be justly called the “sons of God” till the Saviour announced that now he called his disciples no more servants but “sons

 

 

But further, how does the assumption, that “sons of God” signifies the whole race of Seth, agree with the declaration of the Most High? He assures us positively that Noah was the only holy man. Where, then, is the holy race? Where the sons of God?

 

 

Again, how can it be said that the term “sons of God” is used in opposition to the phrase “daughters of men for the sake of contradistinction, when the Lord declares, that there was positively no difference at all? The children of Cain, you say, were born with an evil nature. True; so were the sons of Seth. But the sons of Cain were positively wicked, violent, ungodly, reprobate. So were all the sons of Seth, except Noah alone, as God himself bears witness.

 

 

Again, how self-contradictory, as well as gratuitous, the hypothesis! It represents the race of Seth as so pre-eminently holy, as to be worthy to be called “sons of God and the daughters of the race of Cain to be so eminently wicked, as justly to be called “daughters of men because of their extreme opposition of character; and yet that these supremely holy men, all, without exception, drew near the vortex of their, notoriously ungodly beauty, were all capable of being charmed by it, and all perished thereby! Must we suppose also, that they all married in one month or one year? If not, would not the unmarried “son of God” pause when he saw the fatal effect of their fatal smiles on his once holy brethren, and not pause alone, but turn away with terror and disgust?

 

 

Or must we suppose that there were no females of the family of Seth? So far from it, that we read of the  “daughters” of Seth, while it is hypothesis to assert that Cain had any daughters at all, for it is not mentioned that he had any ! The supposition before us, pushed truly to its fair conclusions, is that Cain’s family were only daughters! For we read only of the “sons of God and only of the “daughters of men”; and if the one term be coextensive with the race of Seth, the other must be also coextensive with that of Cain!

 

 

Or, granting for probability’s sake, that Cain and his is a posterity had both sons and daughters; then all that is affirmed respecting the two races on this hypothesis is, that all the men of Seth’s race were good, and all the women of Cain’s race evil. Whoever will assert, then, that the men of Cain’s race were evil, does it without any shadow of proof even on his own assumption. It is only the females of Cain’s race who were so notoriously wicked as to receive a contradistinguishing name. And he who affirms that the men of Cain’s family were also equally wicked, has not even his own assumed principle to support him!

 

 

But in proof of the position that the men of Seth’s were holy, is it not said immediately after the birth of Enos, Seth’s son, that “then began men to call upon the name the Lord True; but until it can be shown that the word “men” in this place excludes those of the family of Cain, whom alone, it is supposed to include a little farther on, argument is not worth anything.

 

 

Further, is it probable that a whole race were holy in those days, with but one faint promise to support and cheer them; while in these times of meridian light, the “sons of God” are scattered and few? Shall we think that the stream of the faithful was wider at its commencement than at its close? Analogy, again, forbids the untenable hypothesis. Or shall we hold the idea, that none were to be holy on the part of Cain’s race, while all of the family of Seth were to be saved? This were contrary to the ordinary tenor of the “election of grace and would have given currency to the notion, that Seth was not born in Adam’s image, nor his children partakers of the fall; while to be born of Cain’s posterity, would be to be evidently given up to reprobation and despair; and men would have begun to believe that the good works of their father Seth had won them eternal life. But be it observed, all this is ex abundanti. It has been shown before, on the authority of God, that this race of “sons of God” of the family of Seth is a visionary creation of the commentator’s brains; “for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earthTo Noah alone, said God, “Thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation” (chap. 7: 1), while it was granted to him to save his wife, his sons, and their wives, because of his righteousness, as unto Paul were granted those who sailed with him.

 

 

If we once fearlessly apply the conclusion that the phrase “sons of God” signifies angels, how do all inconsistencies vanish! A chaos of contradictory suppositions is reduced to clearness and order, and a clue supplied to unravel some of the most difficult passages of Holy Writ.

 

 

ROBERT GOVETT

 

 

-------

 

 

SEVEN SPIRITS MORE WICKED

 

 

(From The Persia Diocesan Letter)

 

 

We had for quite a time realized that we were wrestling with unseen Powers of Darkness which were very real and very unnerving to us, and one night the whole thing culminated in such a terrible consciousness of the Powers of Darkness trying to overcome us, that we were held speechless and powerless in our bedroom. There was a light lit at the time but it seemed to make little difference and we could not at first shout to Mr. Malcolm; after a time we managed to do so and he came to us and said he thought we were just tired and overwrought: he cheered us and left us. Within two minutes we were shouting for him again, and he was also attacked before he could reach us and felt himself chased through the house. Needless to say we spent the night together and fought in prayer practically the whole time. However we were determined not to be driven out so easily and tried to remain another night. All through dinner we had a terrible fight each within ourselves and as soon as I started evening prayers we were literally driven out of the place and took refuge in another house.

 

 

In case some may feel that our experience was to a great extent nerves, I would add that since coming out this time one of our workers whom I took to Seistan had the same sort of experience as we had in a lesser degree, though quite unconscious of what we had been through. The hosts of evil are especially active here and can be definitely felt around one even by those who are not what one might call psychic. One only mentions these things in full for prayer partners.

 

 

                                                       - H. R. WARD.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

17

 

THE NEPHILIM + 1

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

There are certain great outstanding mysteries in the Word of God which we hesitate to handle: absorbingly interested ourselves, and finding in them buttresses to our own faith, we yet fear to shock, or stumble, or divide, or provoke profitless discussion. Nevertheless in the long run we shall find it a mistake to attempt to be wiser than God. Difficulties are deliberately planted in Scripture as tests of faith, and our characters reveal themselves in their reaction to the Divine revelations; nor can we save others from their reactions. The foolishness of God is wiser than man. Moreover, a supreme reason for grappling with these tremendous mysteries is that, where the truth is suppressed, error fastens luxuriously on the boycotted passage, in which it entrenches itself as in an unassaulted stronghold; and so in the mystery of the Noachic Spirits to whom Christ preached (disembodied) the Roman doctrine of Purgatory, as also the doctrine of a Second Chance, lodge themselves (as they imagine) on solid Scripture foundations. The whole Word of God is needed for the whole elucidation of God.

 

 

THE SONS OF GOD

 

 

That the ‘sons of God’ in Genesis 6 are angels was all but the exclusive belief both of the Synagogue and of the Apostolic Church; nearly all the pre-Pentecostal Rabbis, and practically the whole of the Church of the first three centuries, so understood the Scripture.* The Septuagint, the Bible in our Lord’s hands which was read every Sabbath in His hearing, actually has, instead of ‘sons of God,’ ‘angels of God** Now it is so acutely difficult as to be impossible to conceive how, in the ages of inspiration - the epoch - of Israel’s Prophets, and the later age of the Church’s miraculous gifts - an error so gigantic - if an error - could pass uncorrected and uncontradicted by the Holy Ghost; nor there a single instance (so far as we know) of a doctrine or exposition held in common by the Synagogue and the Church (in their inspired ages) which is not the truth of God. If carefully thought out, this consideration is extraordinarily impressive, and most difficult to refute.

 

* The modern Jewish interpretation appears for the first time in the Targurn of Onkelos in the first Christian century; and the Sethite view appeared first in the Church in Julius Africanus in the third century. Among modern theologians who hold the view of the Apostolic Church are Gesenius, Ewald, Delitzsch, Kurtz, Stier, Alford, Govett, and Pember.

 

** Augustine admits that even in his day the majority of copies read ‘angels of God

 

 

ANGELIC SONS

 

 

Now we look a little closer. The phrase used ha Bene Elohim - occurs four times only in the Old Testament, every time it is used of angels; and it is set, in this in studied contrast to the human - “When MEN began to multiply on the face of the ground, the sons of God saw the daughters of MEN” (Gen. 6: 1). There were at that time no human sons of God, in the spiritual sense, for “ALL FLESH had corrupted its way upon the earth” (Gen. 6: 12); and even Noah, who alone is declared righteous by God, is never called a son of God. Of all the Patriarchs Adam (already dead) and Adam only, is, in the New Testament genealogy of the race (Luke 3: 38), named a ‘son of God’ - manifestly because, as in the case of every angel, he came fresh from the Hand of God in creation. The gloss making the sons of God ‘Sethites’ and the daughters of men ‘Cainites’ is a pure invention of the expositor, a guess not only with no justification whatever in the text, but manifestly in conflict with the entire context. No one would ever have dreamed the phrase meant anything but angels had it not been for the extremely startling nature of the event.

 

 

THE NEW TESTAMENT

 

 

But an event so enormous, and so closely connected human corruption, must, if true, find confirmation in God’s later revelations, and the Apostle Jude - in an epistle significantly a preface to the Apocalypse - sets on it the imprimatur of God. “And angels” - no article: certain angels - “which kept not their own principality, but left their proper habitation” - a statement never made of the Satanic hosts - “he hath kept in bonds” - the Satanic legions, on the contrary, range heaven and earth in perfect liberty - “even as Sodom and Gomorrah, having in like manner WITH THESE given themselves over to fornication, and gone after strange flesh” (Jude 6).* Jude’s revelation is like a flash of lightning. So abominable in God’s sight, says the Apostle, is the horrible misuse of sex in all adultery of species that it drew down the lightnings of Sodom, even as it had provoked the extermination of the Flood. Paul also has a statement which, in this context, is obvious, but without it, a baffling mystery. “The woman ought to have a sign of authority on [over] her head” - a head-dress as a sign of self-control, to give her hand where she will, or (alternatively) of the man’s control - “BECAUSE OF THE ANGELS” (1 Cor. 11: 10).**

 

* “In like manner with these angels just referred to” (Professor S. D. F. Salmond, D.D.). “The manner was similar, because the angels committed fornication with another race than themselves” (Dean Alford). “If we bear in mind that there is something mysterious about the love and connection of the sexes, and that in all who are not wholly sunken, the animal aspect of it - which sin isolates - is pervaded by a more elevated and noble principle; when we further think of its importance in the history of the world, and of salvation, we may perhaps regard it as not quite impossible that angels should have desired to share it” (J. H. Kurtz, D.D.). For a shrewd comment on the verse in Jude see the one excellent and exhaustive work on the whole subject, The Fallen Angels, by J. Fleming (Dublin. 1879), pp. 169 -177.

 

** Woman’s shorn head to-day, accompanied as it begins to be by the uncovered head in worship, is a peculiarly sinister symptom of the age, in the tacit invitation it offers to the unseen world in direct disobedience to the Holy Ghost. Depicting the destiny of the Rephaim, another name for the obnoxious strain, Proverb 9: 18 casts a tragic light on some at least of ‘the daughters of men.’ For the Rephaim, see Dent. 2: 20, 21.

 

 

THE NEPHILIM

 

 

The products of the monstrous marriage, as definitely stated by the Holy Ghost, lift the union out of all possible natural explanations. “The Nephilim” - the giants or ‘fallen’ ones - “were in the earth in those days” - that is, as a signal exception in human history - “and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them” - that is, the offspring were the Nephilim, or giants. That physical frames were produced by the marriage huge, portentous, is proof positive that the Sons of God were superhumans incarnated; and therefore immediately after they are named Jehovah says:- “My Spirit shall not strive with man for ever, for that he ALSO is flesh.” “The gigantic dimensions are not human: it is not the Adamic image, created after the Divine type, which shows itself in such colossal corporeal development” (Nagelstach).

 

 

THE FLOOD

 

 

A very powerful subsidiary proof lies in the close relationship stated by the Spirit of God between this abhorrent irruption and the Deluge. No sooner is the fact stated than the doom falls (verses 2-3); and as soon as the Nephilim, the giant descendants,* are named, so soon is it stated that “the Lord saw that the wickedness of man” - the Nephilim are included in the human: man also is flesh - “was great in the earth Apart from general corruption, and the implied refusal of the Word of God through Noah, the sole fact named in the context of the Flood, the solitary outstanding provocation of God drawing down the extermination of the world, is a marriage as abhorrent to heaven as it was portentous to earth.

 

* “The Nephilim were in the earth in those [pre-diluvian] days, and alao after that” (Gen. 6: 4), in a post-diluvian epoch. And so in Numbers 13: 33 we read:- “There we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, which come of the Nephilim; and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.” Their gigantic proportions are given in Deuteronomy 3: 11, and because of this obnoxious strain Palestine was emptied before Israel, exactly as the earth before Noah.

 

 

HEATHEN MYTHOLOGY

 

 

Remarkable further confirmation lies in the complete exposure the facts afford, an elucidation of astonishing completeness, of all heathen mythology. “We stand here,” as Delitzsch says, “at the fountain of heathen mythology with its legends; but this primitive golden age is divested of all its apotheosizing glory.” Greek mythology weaved itself around a race half-human, half divine, actually named ‘giants,’ Titans, ‘heroes,’ gods “terrible and strong,” says Hesiod, “the race of heroes called demigods”; and it is exceedingly impressive that the very word Peter uses to describe the present prison of these fallen angels, Tartarus, is also named in mythology as the prison of Cronos and the rebel Titans. “The same says the Scripture, “were the mighty men” - Gibborim: ‘the fabulous giants of Olympus’ - “which were of old, the men of renown”: lustful gods, giant magicians, half-heavenly, half-earthly, and altogether evil, the demigods of a dying age.*

 

* They appear to have introduced astrology, sorcery, armour, and medicine; the Book of Enoch attributes to them the introduction of a flesh diet, mentioned by Jehovah only after the Flood (Gen. 9: 3), beauty culture (‘the beautifying of the eyebrows,’ etc.), and cannibalism. The narrative self hints polygamy. The [end of this] age is heading for abominations that peculiarly rouse the wrath of the Creator (Lev. 18: 23). The scientific lectures of Professor Voronoff have been forbidden in England by the Home Office.

 

 

MODERN RECURRENCE

 

 

It is obvious that if the thing is a fact, not only ought the Scriptures to have recorded it, but it ought now to be made known for such warning as may be possible in an utterly incredulous age. For our Lord’s words are inexpressibly solemn:- “AS IT WAS IN THE DAYS OF NOAH, so shall be the Presence” - the Lord’s sojourn in the heavens - “of the Son of man” (Matt. 24: 37). Since the solitary outstanding Noachic event recorded by inspiration, the sole world-filling fact, is the hybrid race, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the later world-judgment will have an identical cause. No Spiritualist would find any insuperable difficulty either in the narrative or in the prophecy, nor needs to be told that Incubi and Succubi have a basis in fact. It was a Corsican tradition that Madame Mere asserted a like birth of her son, Napoleon; and the latest life of Mrs. Eddy (E. F. Dakin’s Mrs. Eddy) openly states of her rival Mrs. Stetson that she “produced a child by immaculate conception,” a rumour among Christian Scientists by no means confined to Mrs. Stetson. ‘Gibbor’ is a term which Scripture applies both to Nimrod (Gen. 10: 8) and to the Antichrist (Hab. 2: 5). Sooner than we know, the world may awake to find itself in pre-Diluvian horrors, and among pseudo-Christs, demi-gods, working miracles so great (Matt. 24: 24) as to imperil even the faith of the elect.*

 

* Our Lord’s statement (Matt. 22: 30) no more makes it impossible for angels to marry than impossible for the risen: all He says is that in heaven marriage is as unpractised among the risen as among the angels. The capability of neither is touched upon. The denial of the possibility assumes a knowledge that we do not possess. There are ‘bodies CELESTIAL’ as well ‘bodies terrestrial’ (1 Cor. 15: 40). “Credible or incredible to man’s wisdom - whether congenial or foreign to his conceptions of things in which a pretence to knowledge is mere folly - whether apparently possible or impossible - the fact is stated in the Bible, and that so plainly that the wisest commentators have been reduced to childish absurdities in attempting to evade it” (S. R. Maitland, D.D.).

 

 

-------

 

 

“I DO ALWAYS THE THINGS WHICH PLEASE HIM”

 

 

In the Saviour there was the perfect intelligence of the Father’s will, a perfect sympathy therewith, and a perfect obedience to it. Now this could not be said of any mere fallen man. It was not true of the greatest and best of God’s servants. ...

 

 

We are told of Hezekiah that God was in general well pleased with him, but once He left him to show him the evil that was in his heart (2 Chron. 32: 31).

 

 

This perfect obedience of our Lord, and perfect conformity to the Father’s will, arose out of oneness of nature with His Father. This was the source of the constant difference, the never-failing superiority of the Redeemer of men over all others. All mere men, all fallen men have discovered, under the pressure of circumstances, their fallen nature. Jesus was the exception. Why? Angels have fallen through disobedience. All created natures certainly fell when left to themselves. But here is One who always pleased the Father.

 

 

This is written to instruct us concerning the true motive and guide of life. Man’s constant tendency is to make himself independent of God, and to use all he has to please, and to glorify himself. But the true principle and compass of life is to seek to please God This goes beyond an obedience to the exterior of God’s commands. “What will please God?’ is the loftiest of principles (1 Thess. 2: 4; 4: 1).

 

 

It is true of us as of the Lord, that God does not leave those whom He has called. Men may leave us, and that in consequence of our saying and doing the very things which please God.

 

 

                                                                                                 - ROBERT GOVETT

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

18

 

THE SONS OF GOD IN THE

OLD TESTAMENT+ 2

 

 

By Lieut. Col. G. F. POYNDER

 

 

 

In the Old Testament “Sons of God” are only referred to in the Book of Genesis (6: 2), and in the Book of Job the reference to “the Sons of the living God” in Hosea 1: 10, is evidently to Israel. The question then for us to decide is “Who are the Sons of God

 

 

First note the distinction between “Sons of God” - males - and “daughters of men” - females - with result of union, Giants; or rather, as it ought to be, Nephilim,* i.e., fallen ones, yet “Men of renown”; these were “in the earth in those days and also after that” (see Num. 13: 33). Sequel, “the wickedness of man was great in the earth”; and this brought about the destruction of created men, animals, birds, and creeping things, by means of the flood; but Noah, and those with him in the ark, were preserved through it.

 

 

* From ‘Naphal’ to fall.

 

 

Turning to the Book of Job (chaps. 1: 6 and 2: 1), there can be no doubt that “the Sons of God” referred to are Angelic beings; like those referred to in Psalm 103: 20, as “Angels that excel in strength, that do His commandments, hearkening unto the Voice of His Word

 

 

Again in Job 38: 7 we read “the morning stars sang together, and all the Sons of God shouted for joywhen the foundations of the earth, and the corner-stone thereof were laid.

 

 

And lastly; the same expression is found in the Book of Daniel,* but in the singular number, and with the necessary difference that ‘bar’ is the word used for son, instead of ‘ben the singular of the latter being unknown in the Chaldee. Nebuchadnezzar exclaims that he sees four men walking in the midst of the fire, and that the form of the fourth is like ‘a son of God by which he evidently means a supernatural or angelic being, distinct as such from the others. ** Evidently then the term “Sons of God” and “Son of God” in Job and Daniel refer to Angelic beings, and there is no valid reason for supposing that the words in Genesis refers to some different order of beings, but are angelic beings who fell from high estate. It has been urged however that in Matthew 22: 30, we are told by our Lord that “Angels of God in heaven” neither “marry nor are given in marriage i.e. of course, in their normal state; but Jude, doubtless referring to these angelic beings, tells us they “kept not their principality, but left their own habitation”; and, being on the earth, attracted by the daughters of men, they intermarried with them, and in consequence are “reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day” (ver. 6). Peter also tells us of “angels that sinned and connects the statement by the word “and” with the destruction of the “old world and salvation of Noah through the flood *** proving most assuredly that “the Sons of God” were not “the Church of the Old Testament,” but were angelic beings. And surely the lesson we need to learn is that it is a great sin in God’s sight to be “unequally yoked together with inbelievers”; to permit the gendering of cattle with a diverse kind; the sowing of a field with mingled seed; or the wearing of a garment mingled of linen and wool: taking to heart also the solemn words addressed to the Church of the Laodiceans.+ Rather may we strive to he whole-heartedly on our Lord’s side, and like Him go about doing good.

 

 

* Daniel 3: 25.   ** Earth’s Earliest Ages, p. 206, by G. H. Pember.   *** 2 Peter 2: 4.   + Revelation 3: 15, 16.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE SCHOOLS

 

 

The revolt of modern youth, which so alarms the Orthodox, makes easier the formation of a antireligious groups in high schools and colleges. With the elimination of religious instruction and the introduction of the teaching of modern science, particularly Evolution, one may with truth say that the Schools in their cources fight for Atheism. - Report of the American Association the Advancement of Atheism.

 

 

-------

 

 

OUR LORD’S WORDS

 

 

Whichever alternative be chosen, how shall such believers (for Dr. Winnington-Ingram professes faith in Christ) confront God? and do our readers not see that one truth for which this magazine - [i.e, D. M. Panton’s ‘Dawn’] - stands - namely, that “the Lord will judge His people” (Heb. 10: 30) - is as certain and inevitable as is utterly solemn? Our Lord’s words have always roused the fierce wrath of the wicked; but they have turned more millions into heaven than can be counted. It is one of the  most pitiful tragedies in the modern world, and probably the fact most closely related to falling conversions, that, as the dread reality dawns nearer every year, so every year its very existence is more openly derided by the representatives (all but a few) of God on earth. So Sodom mocked Lot over coming fire the night before. The final utterance of the Bible, without revision, and without withdrawal, is this:- “The smoke of their torment goeth up for ever and ever” (Rev. 14: 11).

 

 

                                                                              - MELVILLE GROVE KYLE, D.D.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

 

19

 

THE NEPHILIM AND THE FLOOD + 2

 

 

By JOHN FLEMING, B.A.

 

 

 

No one who reads the first twelve or thirteen verses Genesis 6. can avoid coming to the conclusion that Moses* designed to represent the age immediately preceding Deluge as surpassing in point of moral corruption, social wrong, and outrageous crimes any that had gone before it and also, that, between this unprecedented evil and the alliances of the Sons of God with daughters of men, recorded in verse 2, a close connection subsisted - indeed, that the former was, in a great degree, the consequence of the latter. All interpreters recognize this connection, and are agreed that the necessity for a judgment such as that of the Deluge arose out of these alliances.

 

[* NOTE: It is believed by Christians, that Moses - rather than Enoch - are chosen by God to accompany Elijah during the Great Tribulation. (Rev. 11: 3, 4.)]

 

 

Allusions to the spirit-world, or its events, are made sparingly in the Bible, and only when the occasion imperatively demands it. Such an occasion presented itself in connection with the history of the Deluge, the Holy Spirit designing to show the causes which led to the infliction of that tremendous judgment, and thus to vindicate the ways of God. If the angelic intercourse and its result, the production of a new race, together with. the violence and corruption with which the world was filled by their means, constituted the chief and special causes which rendered such a visitation indispensable - then it was not only within the scope of the sacred narrative, but on many grounds expedient that these causes should be revealed; and if Moses has not expressly told us that the Bne-ha-Elohim were angels, it is only because the meaning of the term was, when he wrote, established and well known.

 

 

We look upon it, indeed, as an argument of no small weight, in favour of the angel-interpretation, that on such a ground does there appear a necessity for the almost total destruction of the human race. If the great men of the time‑the rulers, judges, chiefs - chose to form alliances with women of inferior rank - if the elder descendants of Adam formed unions with the women of a later generation - or if Sethite men, conspicuous for piety, united themselves with godless Cainite women - these unions might be incongruous and productive of unhappiness enough to the parties themselves: but they could not be the means of producing the great and general corruption of manners and forgetfulness of God which characterized the age preceding the Deluge, nor do they afford any sufficient explanation of the cause which drew down upon the world a judgment so terrific. But if the ‘Sons of God’ were not men, but angels, who about the period indicated left their “proper habitation and came to earth for the purpose of gratifying unlawful and unnatural desires, we have, in this, a cause at once adequate and likely to produce the unparalleled evil, which led to the ruin of the old world.

 

 

Were not fallen spirits, dwelling amongst mankind, and intimately associated with them, very capable of producing the gross and widely spread depravity of conduct and morals which prevailed in those times? And was not this depravity a natural result of the abode on earth, not only of these fallen but powerful beings, but also of another mighty and lawless race, who owed their origin to them? When we reflect on the evil which fallen spirits have wrought in this world of the untold miseries which one successful act of an evil angel has caused to our race - of the power exercised by such spirits, and the ills which they inflicted on individuals, at the time of the sojourn on earth of Him who will eventually bruise the serpent’s head - we discern in the character and degree of the evil prevalent in the antediluvian age the strongest reason for believing that fallen angels, and their offspring, were the prime cause and authors of it.

 

 

It would have been, as we have already described it, a race of monstrous beings, outside the limits of creation prescribed by the Creator: and, therefore, to put a period to the existence of such a race, and to preserve, in its purity, that which had been originally created in Adam, the greater portion of which had probably become contaminated by means of connection with the mongrel brood, no way, perhaps, remained except the extermination of the whole race then in the world, one family only being preserved in the ark.

 

 

An “improvement” was naturally “to be looked for” after the terrible visitation of the Flood: and, accordingly, an improvement appears in the fact, that those who had not alone disturbed the limits of creation, but who also had been instrumental in producing a state of lawless behaviour and moral depravity to which no other age presents a parallel, were now no longer in the world. “The Nephilim were in the earth” in the antediluvian period, and also the fallen “Sons of God” - and only in that period - and the condition of the world, socially and morally, was in consequence, as we infer from the language of the historian, worse then than in the times succeeding the Deluge. No “such unnatural angel-tragedy” has since been enacted in this world, and, probably, never again will be: and this fact, evident to the Divine foreknowledge, was the ground and reason of the Divine resolve that the judgment of the Flood should never be repeated.*

 

* But a worse judgment, by fire, may have, among its causes, an identical transgression. Evil angels can deliberately repeat that into which good angels, under temptation, once fell; and it is probable that Nietzsche’s nightmare philosophy of the ‘superman’ is a demonic preparation for the fact. - Ed. [D. M. Panton.]

 

 

I do not comprehend,” Kurtz writes, “how the espousal of some pious Sethites with fair women for the sake of their beauty, could have caused a disturbance in the development of human history, so terrible and so irreparable that the evil could be remedied in no way but by the extirpation of the human race. Espousals of that kind have often, and to a large extent, taken place; and if, on every such occasion, a deluge must have followed, the world would have numbered as many deluges as years. That the fair daughters of men, spoken of in Genesis 6., were also godless is only assumed: but, admitting that they were, however blameworthy we may believe such marriages to be, that they should, of necessity, draw after them the judgment of the Deluge is inconceivable

 

 

The real cause of that judgment he explains in a way which to us at least, appears to be completely satisfactory. “We may easily conceive that the commingling of two classes of creatures, so widely separated from each other, and so different in their nature and destination, as are angels and human beings, must be an act by which the limits of creation, ordained by God, would be displaced - a displacement which must, of course, be the more hurtful in its consequences, the higher and more important, in the scale of being, the transgressors on either side. We will see that if such coming were universal - that is, if the unnatural influence had then pervaded the entire human race - the Divine plan would thereby be thrown into disorder, and, in fact, destroyed: and that, in such case, no resource would remain, but either to allow things to take their course, to the absolute and irretrievable ruin of the parties, or else, in order to save the earth and the germ of the race for a new development of human history, to exterminate the whole infected generation, with the exception of eight souls. The evil to be met, in the striking remark of Hofniann, was “not an excess of ordinary sinning - not simply a depraved condition of things within the established limits of creation - but it was, that humanity was no longer propagated from itself, as God had ordained, and that the power of the beings who were brought into existence in a preternatural way, surpassed the limits allowed to human kind: hence, the essential conditions of the existence of mankind as a distinct race being thus unsettled and endangered, there was no way open for the counteraction of the evil, but that of terminating abruptly the history, in the course of which the race was being divested of its humanity

 

 

In the practice of Angel Worship, which had been making progress in the Church from, at least, the second century, we can discern a cause amply sufficient to account for the substitution of a new interpretation. “The development of angel-worship,” says Dr. Kurtz, “progressing imperceptibly, but, for that reason, all the more irresistibly, could not continue without exerting a transforming influence on the historic-dogmatic opinions respecting angels. It could not continue without gradually, but surely, removing everything that might tend to shake the confidence in the holiness of angels, or mar the gratification which their worship afforded: all those angels (it was therefore assumed, in opposition to the views of the earlier Fathers), who had not suffered themselves to be involved in Satan’s sin, had become confirmed in their state of holiness, so that apostasy from it became, from that time, impossible

 

 

-------

 

 

DEVOTIONAL

 

 

There are voices in the darkness - calling, calling,

While Old Year guards her dead:

Longing calls for love’s lost treasure;

Jests, and clamant cries for pleasure;

But glad hearts, that love their Friend

Are singing, “Yea ! He cometh, as He said,

And we may greet the joy-year without end

Ere this New Year hath fled

 

 

Shall we see another springtime, New Year, New Year,

With earth’s fair blossoms sown?

Grain up-sprung for autumn’s reaping,

Fountains waked from winter’s sleeping;

All the wealth of woodland bowers?

Or have enter’d fairer lands unknown,

Where they gather ever-fragrant flowers

To lay before the Throne?

 

 

Will there be a harvest gather’d, New Year, New Year?

Ere we behold God’s Face ?

Ripen’d grain for winter’s needing

And the coming year’s fresh seeding -

Shall we see the crimsoning leaves?

Or with saints of every nation, every race,

Be gather’d as the first-ripe harvest sheaves

In the Kingdom of His grace?

 

 

                                                                                                   - MARIAN H. ROWE

 

 

A NEW YEAR

 

 

One night in my church, just as we were turning out the lights we discovered a bundle of rags, and in them was, I think, the worst looking man I ever saw; he was fast asleep in one of the seats. Two of the young men held him up while he prayed; and ever since that night, that man has been one of the most earnest, consecrated men in Christian work that I ever knew.

 

                                                              - A. J. GORDON, D.D.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

20

 

YOUTH BEFORE THE ADVENT + 1

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

The reign of Solomon, prince of peace - magnificent, warless - is a divine forecast of Messiah’s glorious Reign: David, hunted, battling for the Throne, but laying up enormous hidden wealth for the Temple and the Palace, is the Gospel era: the intermediate generation between the two, appearing at the close of David’s epoch, is Absalom, the youthful generation on the threshold of Advent. This striking type explains the curious prominence of Absalom as the embodiment and photograph of an - [evil and apostate] - age. For before Absalom there opened a golden vision of limitless possibilities. The son of a praying father, and brought up in a godly home, he possessed all the culture of his day, combined with great natural beauty, a rare gift of winning others to himself, and the immediate succession to the most glorious Kingdom and Temple earth has ever seen. It is the generation inheriting the Christian ages and standing on the threshold of the Advent. Yet the golden vision proved a gigantic mirage. ‘Absalom’ - meaning the ‘father’ or ‘predecessor’ of ‘peace’ - pre-deceased the peace he never saw; he sought a throne, and found a grave; and the peculiar manner of his death affixed on him the direct Curse of God.

 

 

GIFTED YOUTH

 

 

An emphasis is laid on the physical perfection of Absalom unique in the Bible. “In all Israel there was none to be so much praised as Absalom for his beauty: from the sole of his foot even to the crown of his head there was no blemish in him” (2 Sam. 14: 25). In science, in sport, in hygiene, in war, in invention in exploration - in finished accomplishment in all that is admirable and splendid in the flesh - youth to-day is probably unsurpassed.* It is extraordinary how our Lord has foreshadowed exactly this of the generation on the threshold of the Advent. “The evil spirit findeth it [the generation he formerly possessed] empty, swept, and garnished”; exorcized, clean, cultured; a civilization largely without idolatry, witchcraft, and demon possession, - hygenic and healthy, - rich in science and art: “and he taketh seven other spirits more evil than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: even so shall it be unto this generation” (Matt. 12: 45). With curious though unconscious aptness Sir Robertson Nicoll remarks:- “To educate without religion is to enlarge and refine the habitation of the devil in the human heart

 

* Thus a recent writer’s praise of the youth of to-day need not conflict with prophecy. He says:- “I like them for their frankness and humour, their loyal comradeship, their passionate sincerity, their driving energy, and their freshness of outlook. They have no evasions or repressions, they do not dodge difficulties; and are for the most part fearless, honest and adventurous. They are gloriously free from snobbishness.” It is curious that the two girls chosen this year for supreme beauty - ‘Miss Universe’ (Miss Goldarbeiter) and ‘Miss Europe’ (Miss Simon) - are both Jewesses, that is, actually of Absalom’s blood.

 

 

UNREGENERATE YOUTH

 

 

Now in the roots of Absalom’s life will be found all the tragedy of modern youth. Absalom had a David for a father, but a heathen princess for his mother; and under the fatal shadow of this spiritual disunion in the home we search the sacred record in vain for his conversion; and without conversion in every one of us is a slumbering volcano of hell. The only time Absalom is ever recorded (2 Sam. 15: 7) as seeking Jehovah it was as a cloak for seizing his father’s throne. Eighty per cent. of the scholars in our Sunday Schools leave them unconverted. A year ago a youth named Hickman, on the gallows for the foul murder of a girl, revealed the enormity that modern education can produce. Before execution he made this confession:- “During high school I took interest in evolution and atheism and denied the Christian faith. Therefore I became susceptible to worse errors and finally took up crime and murder. I don’t want any young man to study my crime, for all can see where it has led to. My mind was so warped by over-education that I became a fiend incarnate, living without consideration of mercy toward mankind. I decided to kill a human being as a supreme experiment, to test my limitations. I even planned to lead the career of a super-criminal, masking my activities under the guise of a Christian minister. If I had not been caught when I was, I undoubtedly would have committed even greater atrocities than the murder of Marion Parker

 

 

CHIVALRY

 

 

Now Absalom’s first recorded act, the germ and embryo of his career, and the kernel of modern youth, is both youth’s point of approach and its point of departure. Stung by the intolerable wrong done by his brother Amnon to his sister Tamar, and by the callous lethargy of the King, who ought to have been not alone the fountain of honour but the executor of justice, Absalom murders Amnon. The chivalry is altogether lovable: the lawlessness - for what in David would have been an execution (Lev. 20: 17) is in Absalom a murder - is deadly. To redress lawlessness by lawlessness is only to breed lawlessness. Modern youth thinks itself emancipated from convention when what it emancipates itself from is the moral law. Last year the Senior Class oration in the Commemoration at Harvard expressed youth’s revolt:- “A new and different generation represents a fundamental change since the War. It has freed itself from old dogma, or, better still, the old ‘cant’; even from can’t, with the apostrophe. It essentially accepts no faith (in the old meaning of the word) and has little, save in the inevitability of progress, and is in no danger of using outworn creeds and methods to cure the evils it has inherited” (Literary Digest, July 14th, 1928).* It is very solemn that the whole hope of the world lies in - Absalom.

 

* The lawlessness of youth, of all symptoms the most ominous, and inevitable when the restraints of religious faith are cast off, is far more characteristic of our day than any of us has yet realized. American figures - the only ones available - show that more than 8o per cent. of all crimes, from murder down to petty misdemeanours, are committed by persons less than 22 years old; that the average age of burglars has decreased in ten years from 29 to only 21 years; that 51 per cent. of automobile thefts are committed by persons under 18; and that 42 per cent. of the unmarried mothers are schoolgirls averaging 16 years of age. Absalom’s public and shameless immorality (2 Sam. 16: 22), lawless even in a lawless age, forecasts the sharp moral decadence of an age to close as Sodom (Luke 17: 30),

 

 

REBELLION

 

 

In Absalom there opens a deep and deadly breach between the generation closing and the generation rising. His character, from the moment that he takes the wrong turn, develops with amazing rapidity. A ‘fast’ youth - “Absalom prepared him a chariot and horses, and fifty men to run before him” (2 Sam. 15: 1) - he plots his father’s overthrow, and his dream of world-power in his own hands is the epitome of youth’s mirage to-day. “Oh, that I were made judge in the land, that any man which hath any suit or cause might come unto me, and I would do him justice” (2 Sam. 15: 4) - the undying dream of the lawless that they are ideal administers of law. Lawlessness logically culminates in apostasy. Absalom knew perfectly that he struck at the Lord’s Anointed when the counsel to murder David “pleased Absalom well The Christ must be dethroned before coronation of the Antichrist. In Russia, from the six million Communist youths a manifesto has been issued with these words:- “We, the young godless ones, are waging active war against our religious parents: we will climb up to heaven and sweep away the gods.” The breach between the two generations is also a breach between the rising generation and God.

 

 

DOOM

 

 

Very moving, unutterably solemn, truly awful is the going down of the sun. The climax is altogether of God. Splendidly built, magnificently moulded, hangs a twisting convulsive figure, with head jammed, and javelins sticking through the heart, his magnificent hair the rope of his own scaffold, on a gallows man never made. By what lawyers call an ‘act of God,’ that is, a providence that has behind it Deity, the generation is executed, in type - for “cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree” (Gal. 3: 13); and divinely gifted youth, proxime accessit to the Kingdom, its very beauty its halter, summoned (as youth is) for war - like the ten million dead on the plains of Europe - goes down at Armageddon in a slaughter man never made.*

 

* Russia has nearly 5,000,000 men trained as soldiers under thirty, part it may be of the hordes to descend on the Holy Land (Ezek. 38); India’s 50,000 university graduates are “almost solid” for revolt, says the Secretary of the Indian Council of Y.M.C.A.’s; and China’s youth is seething to pour across the Euphrates one day behind the Yellow Kings (Rev. 16: 12).

 

 

Exquisitely does the type present our duty in the modern age. “And David went up the ascent of the Mount of Olives, and wept as he went up; and all the people that with him went up, weeping as they went” (2 Sam. 15: 30). It is a heartbroken Church over prodigal wanderers. Any frailty or sin in man can never picture Christ, and David’s deplorable indulgence of his wayward son is no part of the type; but the broken King’s overwhelming love and, passion of pardoning grace is no unworthy shadow of our Lord’s. “Deal gently for my sake he cries. “with the young man” (2 Sam. 18: 5). The Greater David hung from the Tree for all the Absaloms of the world, and no period is put to the return of the prodigal son. Abels and Samuels and Timothys, it may even be Isaiahs and Pauls, lie embedded in modern youth, only waiting to spring into shape and form under the chisel of the Gospel. Nor need hope expire except with life.* A Church clergyman named Galbraith, a powerful evangelist in the days of Whitefield, had a son utterly heedless and dissolute, who remained unchanged up to his father’s death. His own life then ran its course in debauchery and sin; but when dying, a friend at his bedside, seeing a lovely light in his face, asked the reason. “I am just thinking,” exclaimed the dying man, “what my father’s face will look like when he sees me entering the Holy City

 

* Of Bathsheba’s child, dying in infancy and so covered by Calvary, David says:- “I will go to him” (2 Sam. 12: 23); but in spite of his frantic grief he says no such word of Absalom, a lost soul on the other side of the golf.*

 

[* See Luke 16: 23-26, R.V.]

 

 

-------

 

 

In Him we dwell, Beloved,

Then let us rest:

By changes all unmoved,

In Him so blest.

 

 

Nor Heaven’s throne-near host

Can nearer be

Than we, who from the lost

Are saved, are free.

 

 

In Him we dwell, not aught

Can blot this truth:

We, who have been Blood-bought,

Are His Blood-worth.

 

 

So precious in His sight,

And loved, and known;

Come day or cometh night,

We are His own.

 

 

                                                                                         - GILBERT INGRAM.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

21

 

ANTICHRIST’S EMPIRE UNIVERSAL

 

 

By G. H. LANG

 

 

 

What power or union of powers can be supposed as strong enough to refuse to recognize Antichrist’s overlordship? But it appears that the element of compulsion will not be required at the climax of his career, for we read that “the whole earth wondered after the beast, and they worshipped the dragon because he gave his authority unto the beast, and they worshipped the beast, saying, who is like unto the beast? and who is able to war with him? (Rev. 13: 3, 4).

 

 

It is declared of the Beast that “ the Dragon gave him his power and his throne, and great authority” (Rev. 13: 2),       and therefore if Satan’s power is universal so will be that of the Beast. Can we, conceive of Satan being contented with a portion only of the earth, especially when he shall just have been ousted of his nobler heavenly sphere? Did he not show to our Lord “all the kingdoms of the world” ([Greek ...]), “the inhabited earth”), and say:- “To Thee will I give all this authority, and the glory of them; for it hath been delivered unto me: and to whomsoever I will give it?” (Luke 4: 6). Is it not written concerning Satan that “the whole world lieth in the evil one?” (1 John 5: 19), and is not this a strictly universal fact? It is the same expression as in chap. 2: 2 ; “He [Christ Jesus] is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the whole world.” Three times Christ termed Satan “the prince of the world not of “the Roman world” or “the prophetic earth

 

 

A the fourth Beast it is declared that “it shall devour the earth” (Dan. 7: 23). There seems no reason why this should not be strictly fulfilled in due time. It is urged that the corresponding term in the New Testament (the inhabited earth), does not always imply universality, but that fact cannot affect the force of an expression as used in Hebrew and Chaldee six hundred years before Christ, before Roman and Greek usage had given a sometimes restricted meaning to a Greek word which properly denotes universality. The force of the term in Dawn must be learned from the Old Testament, nor have we to go beyond the writings of Daniel himself to see the sense in which he uses it. In chap. 2: 35, it is said of the stone cut without hands, that is, Messiah’s kingdom, that it became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. This certainly means universality. The word is thus translated in the Old Testament some twenty-five times, and seems regularly to imply universality. Jehovah is the Lord of the whole earth (Psa. 108: 5: Isa. 54: 5; Zech. 4: 14); His glory does or shall fill the whole earth (Isa. 6: 3; Psa. 72: 19); the waters of the flood covered the face of the whole earth (Gen. 8: 9); the whole earth was repeopled from the sons of Noah (Gen. 9: 19); before Babel the whole earth spoke one language (Gen. 11: 1); Jerusalem is to be the joy of the whole earth (Psa. 48: 2); God’s watchful eyes “run to and fro throughout the whole earth” (Zech. 4: 10); His purposes of judgment affect the whole earth (Isa. 14: 26 28: 22); Jeremiah groaned that as a prophet he had been made a man of contention to the whole earth (Jer. 15: 10), which was because he had been charged (25: 15-33) with messages of doom (ver. 26) to “all the kingdoms of the world (the usual word for earth, as in the expression ‘the whole earth’), which are upon the face of the earth (ground, as in Gen. 2: 5).”

 

 

In view of this uniform sense we see no reason for limiting the force of the word when applied to the fourth Beast, or when used of the Babylon which is to be, when it, as the capital of Antichrist, is spoken of as “the hammer of the whole earth” (Jer. 1: 23), the period being that when God shall pardon and deliver the Remnant of Israel (vers. 19, 20). And so of the third kingdom the first will be fulfilled in that “it shall bear rule over all the earth” (Dan. 2: 39), which will be fulfilled in that the last emperor, Antichrist, will arise out of one of the four regions into which Alexander’s empire was divided at his death (Dan. 8: 8-12). So again, when the super-human king of Babylon of Isaiah 14. is destroyed (which is to be at the time when Israel receives rest from sorrow and hard service, (ver. 3), it is said:- “Jehovah hath broker the staff of the wicked, the sceptre of the rulers, that smote the peoples in wrath with a continual stroke, that ruled the nations in anger, with a persecution that none restrained. The whole earth is at rest, is quiet: they break forth into singing” (vers. 5-7 and comp. Hab. 3: 3-6). And finally in the concluding words of this great prophecy of the doom of the Beast (Isa. 14: 26), the term ‘whole earth’ is equivalent to ‘all the nations’: “This is the purpose that is purposed upon on the whole earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations for the purpose of God is to deal at that time with the whole earth, literally and universally, and so Christ said:- “But when the Son of man shall come in His glory, and all the angels with Him, then shall He sit on the throne of His glory? and before Him shall be gathered all the nations” (Matt. 25: 31, 32), which must be taken universally, seeing that Christ’s authority is to be universal. The destruction of the armies of the Beast is described in Rev. 19: 17, 18, as the “great supper of God This supper is pictured in Isaiah 18: 6, and verse 3 shows that the day will affect “all inhabitants of the world and all dwellers on earth The same era is detailed in Jeremiah 25., which first (vers. 15-25) specifies numerous kings that shall drink of the wine of the cup of God’s fury, and “reel to and fro, and be mad a Biblical parallel to the pagan proverb, “Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad Then follows (ver. 26) the statement that, in addition to the kings named, there shall drink of that wine of fury, “all the kings of the north, far and near, one with another, and all the kingdoms of the world, which are upon the face of the earth”: and this is allowed by the significant word, “and the king of Sheshach (that is, Babylon, see R.V. margin and chap. 51: 41) shall drink after them” Thus the judgments of those times of which the destruction of Antichrist will be the climax, will affect “all the kingdoms of the world which are upon the face of the earth This phrase is conclusive as to the unlimited area affected, but it is enforced by the further unequivocal statements:- “I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth” (ver. 29). “Jehovah ... shall give a shout against all the inhabitants of the earth” (ver. 30). “Jehovah hath a controversy with the nations, He will plead with all flesh” (ver. 31). “Evil shall go forth from nation to nation, and a great tempest shall be raised up from the uttermost parts of the earth. And the slain of the Lord shall be at that day from one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth” (vers. 32-33).

 

 

These universal terms dating from five to seven centuries cannot be restricted by a political usage of a word in another language by other peoples in a later age. The Greek word [...] means properly the whole habitable earth, and therefore expresses universality (Luke 4: 5; Rom. 10: 18; Heb. 1: 6, 2: 5). It is so used in the Septuagint at Psa. 1: 12:- “the world is thine, and the fulness thereof Any restrict meaning is secondary, as when it is said of the Apostles, that they had “turned the world upside down” (Acts 17: 6), or that Caesar Augustus had ordered a census of all the world (Luke 2: 1). In Acts 11: 28 and 19: 27, the term may have its limited or its unlimited force, and seeing that it has two meanings, it is a matter for study as to which it has in any given passage. Rev. 16: 14, speaks of “spirits of demons, working signs, which go forth unto the kings of the whole inhabited earth, to gather them together unto the war of the great day of God, the Almighty” (Har-Mageddon). Here [the Greek word ...] probably has the limited sense; first, because a monarch naturally draws his fighting forces from his own proper subjects rather than from outside peoples, upon whose fidelity he cannot wholly depend; and second, because other Scripture show that during that same period, Egypt and also Media and eastern and northern kings will attack the Beast, and the latter will destroy his country and capital (Isa. 13; Jer. 50; Dan. 11: 40-44. But the facts that some who at first served him later become disaffected, and that his military forces will be drawn from his own original dominions (if this shall prove to be the case), in no way nullify the testimony of Scripture to his earlier universal supremacy, which he will use as opportunity for universal persecution of the godly.

 

 

The secondary and restricted sense of any word ought not to be introduced where the primary and usual meaning creates no difficulty, and especially not where [the Greek word ...] is joined to words, or is used as the equivalent of terms, which have unlimited force, as in Matthew 24: 14; “this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world, for a testimony unto all the nations Here the expression “all the nations is obviously without limit, and does not mean “some of the nations,” that is, those in the area of the Roman earth of Christ’s day. It is a future day that is in question, the times of the end: “then shall the end come”; and very certainly the gospel is intended for all mankind, and the people for God’s name (Acts 15: 14) are to be gathered out of “every tribe and tongue and people and nation” (Rev. 5: 9).

 

 

In Rev. 12: 9, we read that, “the great dragon was cast down, the old serpent, he that is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole inhabited earth This reference to Satan as the ancient serpent plainly refers back to Eden and all subsequent history and requires that “the whole inhabited earth” shall be understood in its full sense.

 

 

Nor can any sound plea be urged for limiting its force in Rev. 3: 10: “Because thou didst keep the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of trial, that hour which is to come upon the whole inhabited earth, to try them that dwell upon the earth

 

 

The expression “to be kept from”, out of, a trial by no means allows of the sense “to be enabled to endure” a trial, but evidently means not to be called upon to meet it.* Then also, we have already seen from a wealth of passages that the Day of the Lord is most assuredly to affect the whole (earth) world without limit, so that to be “kept from that hour of trial” cannot mean to escape from a so-called “prophetic earth” into outside regions, for there will be no regions unaffected by the Day of the Lord. Nor can “the hour of trial” be the Day of the Lord which is to follow the Tribulation, for that Day is not one of trial but of judgment. The terms tempt (or try) and temptation (or trial) do not appear to be applied thereto, for the sufficient reason that the period of testing and proving man is then over, and the time for judgment resulting from that previous testing is then come. Moreover, that is the Day of the Lord, whereas it has just before been intimated that Satan, not the Lord, is the agent of temptation (trial): “the Devil is about to cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried” (2: 10). Thus the “hour of trial” will be the Tribulation, and it will be as universal as is the earth, for “the whole inhabited earth is obviously equal to “those dwelling upon the earth”, and since a limit cannot rightly be attached here to the term “the earth” nor can attach to [the Greek word...] as here used,

 

* John 17: 15 is quoted to the contrary: “I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them out of the evil one.” Here the ‘the world’ is the sphere in which men have their bodily existence and ‘the evil one’ is the sphere in which they have their moral existence: “the whole world lieth in the evil one” (1 John 5: 19). To be taken out of the world means bodily removal from the earth, not to be strengthened to endure its bodily afflictions: to be kept out of the evil one means similarly that the inner, the true man, moves no more in the evil one as the sphere of moral life, not merely that the believer is strengthened to endure temptation. His inner man is translated out of one kingdom into another (Col. 1: 13). The idea of of location is in all these passages.

 

 

That the edict of persecution will be more strictly enforced at the centre than at the circumference of the Beast’s dominions, may well prove the case, and therefore it may be that the “sheep” (Matt. 25: 33-40), who favoured the avowed followers of Christ (My brethren) during the Tribulation, will come mainly from those northern and eastern countries whose kings by that time will be disaffected against the Beast. But if this prove so it will further show that even in their areas the edict of the Beast will have authority, and that not even there will the godly “escape all those things that shall come to pass” (Luke 21: 36).

 

 

Finally, the application to the rule of the Beast of terms necessarily having universal force, requires that the same force be given to all expressions concerning his rule. The following phrases from only one section of the Apocalypse (chaps. 12. & 13.) should be considered as being a connected series, and therefore to be construed together.

 

 

(1) Chap. 12: 9: “The old serpent ... the Devil and Satan the deceiver of the whole inhabited earth

 

 

(2) 12: 12: “Woe for the earth and for the sea: because the Devil is gone down unto you

 

 

(3) 13: 3: “The Dragon gave him (the Beast) his power and his throne, and great authority

 

 

(4) 13: 3: “The whole earth wondered after the Beast

 

 

(5) 13: 7 “There was given to him (the Beast) authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation

 

 

(6) 13: 8 : “And all that dwell on the earth shall worship him (the Beast), everyone whose name hath not been written in the book of life of the Lamb

 

 

(7) 13: 12 : “He (the second beast) maketh the earth and them that dwell thereon to worship the Beast

 

 

(8) 13: 14: “He deceiveth them that dwell on the earth

 

 

Now Nos. 1 and 2 show that the [the Greek  word ...]  and “the earth” are co-extensive each with the other and with the influence of Satan, which is the “whole world” as we know from 1 John 5: 19. “Earth” here is in contrast with “the heavens” and “the sea,” thus meaning all the land surface of the globe. No. 3 shows that the Beast will rule this same sphere. Since then the term “earth” is universal, plainly “the whole earth” must be the strengthened term in No. 4, “the whole earth” must be universal. The expression in No. 5 “every tribe and people and tongue and nation” is used in chap. 5: 9, of the redeemed heavenly people : in 11: 9, again of the subjects of the Beast and again in chap. 14: 6, of all who ought to fear God, give Him glory, and worship Him because He is the Creator. In he first and last instances this distributive formula cannot be limited to a supposed Roman or “prophetic” earth, for the heavenly Church will not be drawn from such an area only, and that men should worship the Creator is a duty incumbent upon all mankind.

 

 

In No. 6, “all that dwell on the earth” are all those whose names are not in the book of life, and in No. 7 and 8 there seems no reason for taking “earth” to mean anything less than it meaning in No. 2, that is, the whole world.

 

 

It is therefore not allowable to take the word [...],when used of the rule of the Beast, in its limited sense. His sphere will be that of Satan, the whole earth; he will have authority over every tribe, people, tongue and nation; in his time will convey its natural, primary, full meaning of “all that dwell on the earth

 

 

Thus world movements are preparing for one world authority: Satan’s sphere already is the whole world: the Beast will sit on his throne and rule for him: that Satan and the Beast will aim at less than universal dominion cannot be supposed, nor would any scheme but that of one central world authority promise cessation from world strife, the need and longing of the race. Thus the numerous and various Biblical terms which describe the Beast’s kingdom combine to describe worldwide rule.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

22

 

THE KINGDOM LOST + 2

 

 

 

Lot is the incarnation of a single truth. No sooner has the first great response to the call of God been made - Abraham, the pilgrim father of all pilgrim-fathers of the world - than, alongside, there appears Lot - a soul equally called, but who makes the wrong choice on the threshold of discipleship. The appearance of Lot on the page of Scripture is the appearance of an utterly unknown character. All we know is that here is a soul identified with the calling and regeneration of Abraham. He too has abandoned Ur at the call of God: he too has left the world and its idols for ever: he too has ‘crossed the water’,* as a baptized believer: he too, as a regenerate soul, is defined by an Apostle (2 Pet. 2: 7) as ‘righteous Lot’: he too never returns to Ur of the Chaldees, but dies an exile in a foreign land. But suddenly Abraham’s and Lot’s paths sharply sunder, and sunder for the rest of life. It is the forking of the ways which never fails to start up before every new-born soul; and - purposely - never has it been shown more sharply or more dramatically than in Abraham, the tireless walker with God on the mountain heights - and Lot, dwelling in the Gate of Sodom. Abraham is the spiritual believer, inheriting the glory of the [Millennial]** Kingdom: Lot is the carnal believer, escaping destruction by a hair’s breadth.

 

* The supposed derivation of ‘Hebrew 

 

[** NOTE: It is this inheritance which the Holy Spirit and the Apostle Paul, warns us, which we, through wilful sin and disobedience, can lose! ( See Rev. 2: 25-27; cf. Psa. 2: 8; Gal. 5: 21; Eph. 5: 5, 6; Heb. 12: 17, 25, R.V.)]

 

 

There are decisive moments in every life, moments when character, bitten into as by a mordant acid, takes an indelible writing determining a life-destiny. Such a moment came to the young pilgrim as, fresh from his wonderful escape from Ur, he stood on the heights above the Cities of the Plain. “And Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the Plain of Jordan, like the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt” (Gen: 13: 10); lovely as the vanished glories of Eden, rich as the alluvial wealth of the Nile. Simultaneously there breaks on our ears the tolling of a funeral bell. “Now the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners against the Lord exceedingly Beneath that soil fair as Paradise slumbered volcanic fires. Wickedness - exactly the wickedness we look out upon in the world to-day - slept in the Cities of the Plain, and wrath slumbered under soil lovely as Eden; with no prayer for guidance, no thought how best to serve God, no investment of time for eternity, unheedful of volcanic flames or divine warnings, “Lot chose him all the Plain of Sodom.”

 

 

Now the Scripture, with deep wisdom, makes no comment whatever, but allows the after-history of Lot to reveal, in its far-reaching effects, the profound significance of his choice. Lot had the faith to renounce Ur: he had not the faith to renounce Sodom - the second great renunciation we are all called to make (Luke 14: 33); and the easier step is the first, for the second step involves continuous renunciation. Now the first inevitable effect is instantaneous and invariable. “They [Abraham. And Lot] - separated themselves one from the other The carnal disciple is always surprised, and generally angered, to find a sudden gulf yawn between himself and his spiritual brother; but the - [possible, without repentance and restoration (Luke 13: 3-5: Rev. 3: 19, 20.)] - irreparable loss of heavenly companionship is the awful consequence of a worldly choice. “Can two walk together except they be agreed Abraham remained among his oaks of Mamre: Lot approached Sodom - pitched his tent near Sodom - entered Sodom - and finally dwelt ‘in the gate’ (the guildhall, - [and amongst Sodom’s ruling politicians] - the hub and fashion) of Sodom; exactly as a swimmer who dares the outer currents of a whirlpool always ends at last in its vortex.

 

 

The second consequence for Lot is a harassed, jarred, unsatisfied heart. Scripture sums up in Lot, as in no other man, distress of soul through ungodly environment. “Sore distressed says the Apostle, “by the lascivious life of the wicked, that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their lawless deeds” (2 Pet. 2: 7). The pure regenerate spirit is bruised, sore, wounded, while the money-lust chains it down to where, every day, it is thus stabbed. It is probably safe to say that Lot never had another day of pure joy again, after he had left the heavenly heights of Mamre; and it is the only thing ever said in the Scriptures in his favour. Sodomites can be happy in Sodom: men of God cannot. “The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil: which some reaching after” - not the wealth inherited (Gen. 13: 5), but the wealth coveted, created the disaster - “have been led astray from the faith, and have pierced themselves through with many sorrows. But thou, O man of God, flee these things!” (1 Tim. 6: 10). For Lot entered Sodom as a merchant, not as a missionary. Doctors and nurses who enter a small-pox ward enter with antiseptics and every possible precaution to save their own lives, in nobly saving the lives of others: far otherwise is it with a man who deliberately takes up his residence in a street every other house in which has cholera.

 

 

The third consequence of Lot’s choice ought to make many a disciple of Christ pause ere choosing Sodom:-namely, the spiritual collapse of the entire family. The errors of a good man are often most disastrous in the succeeding generation. Lot, like countless millions since, probably persuaded himself that the choice of worldly wealth was all for his children’s good: he had better have let them starve. Wherever Abraham went, we read of an altar: search the narrative, and you will find no altar - no daily confession of his Lord - with Lot. With what consequence? His wife becomes the God-selected example of a divided heart for all ages; his daughters, falling  into incest, become Moab and Ammon - ‘the children of Lot’ whom the Psalmist (63: 8) includes among the worst enemies of God; and the last time we see Lot himself, we see him drunk.

 

 

A fourth consequence of Lot’s choice was one the - [regenerate but] - carnal disciple neither ponders nor foresees. Lot may have pacified his conscience by the influence for good he intended to exert on the Sodomites. It is a constant miscalculation made by the worldly disciple. The Sodomites, including Lot’s sons-in-law, would be surprised to see a pious man choosing a godless neighbourhood: they would at once discount a religion which seeks exactly what the man of the world seeks: the last man to have any influence over Sodom is the man who chooses Sodom. They would take his daughters, but not his religion. Lot left Sodom without a single convert; and when, roused at last to imminent - [and divine] - judgments, he tried to warn them, he was in their eyes as one that joked - Sodom would not take seriously the man whose life was not squared to his creed.

 

 

The final consequence of Lot’s choice is extraordinarily dramatic:- lingering and reluctant, he is forced out of the Sodom he chose by resistless Angels. How soon and how suddenly the ‘Paradise’ of Lot’s choice lay a blasted ruin beneath the waters of the Dead Sea! Lot’s losses were enormous. By his own choice he lost the - [promised inheritance in the] - Holy Land: he lost the sanctity of his own wife: he lost the souls of his children:* he lost the keen edge of his own spiritual character: he lost a record he might have had in after ages for goodness and fidelity and truth. Probably the whole Bible contains no more concrete example, worked out into its minutest detail, of the great New Testament truth:- “If any [disciple’s] work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but himself shall be saved; yet so as through fire” (1 Cor. 3: 15) - escaping from a burning ruin down a corridor of flame. Lot entered Sodom a man of substance, he leaves it a pauper: he entered it a - [potential] - prince, he leaves it a fugitive: he flees from falling lightnings which consume the architecture of a lifetime.**

 

* Their successful flight from Sodom may be meant to prove that his daughters themselves, as elementary believers, were saved; but it is certain that the remainder of Lot’s stock - Moab and Ammon - were reprobate.

 

** It is exactly these stupendous losses which make the current evangelical theology burke, where it does not bitterly oppose, the fundamental regeneration of such a soul. C. H. Mackintosh, so gentle and gracious a writer though he is, is a typical example. “It seems plain,” he says, “that Lot was, from the very beginning, borne onward rather by Abraham’s influence and example, than by his own faith in God: the call of God had not reached his heart.” Such exposition (of course, unconsciously) is a grave contradiction of the Holy Ghost, who stresses, as strongly as it can be stressed, Lot’s fundamental rightness with God:- “righteous Lot [was] sore distressed, for that righteous man vexed his righteous soul with their lawless deeds” (2 Pet. 2: 7). ‘Lot’ means a covering, a veil; and as among the righteous who scarcely are saved (1 Pet. 4: 18). Lot is a child of light who passes under heavy eclipse to shine out again in the Eternal Ages (Rev. 22: 5).

 

 

Now the whole setting of Lot’s life is rounded off - ended as it began - by the life of the model believer, Abraham. No sooner has Lot made his selfish and callous choice, and so left Abraham isolated and alone, than - as ever - God is suddenly at Abraham’s side. The Land which Lot had renounced, Jehovah now, and for the first time, immediately confers upon Abraham* - an allegory and symbol of a regenerate and glorified [millennial] earth: not for immediate possession, as Sodom became Lot’s; yet granted personally - “to thee will I give it” - so compelling and guaranteeing his [select] resurrection from the dead.* God gives enormously more to the separated [and Holy Spirit instructed] soul than the carnal believer, with all his choosing, can ever obtain for himself, Both “lifted up their eyes”; but while Lot’s vision never reached further than the Cities of the Plain, Abraham looked beyond the horizon, beyond the setting suns, beyond the chanting of Seraphim, and saw “the city which hath the foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb. 11: 10). Mamre was Abraham’s Pisgah; in its sacred groves are said to be the oldest authentic graves of this earth; and one at least shall break - “ye shall see Abraham in the Kingdom of God” (Luke 13: 28). And even now potency to help the carnal lies in the spiritual alone. It is Abraham who rescues Lot from the marauding Kings (Gen. 14: 14) and it is the intercessions of Abraham which bring the delivering Angels to the gates of Sodom.

 

[* See Acts 7: 4b, 5, R.V: “God removed him” - Abraham’ (verse 2)} - “into this land, wherein ye now dwell: 5 and he gave him NON INHERITANCE in it, no, not so much as to set his foot on: and he promised that he would give it to him...” See Gen 17: 1-8. & Gen. 26: 3-5, R.V.]

 

* Even a benighted soul can see the folly of a worldly choice. Mohammed, viewing rich Damascus, turned away exclaiming:- “There is but one Paradise for man; and I am resolved to have mine in the other world

 

 

-------

 

 

SALVATION THROUGH FIRE

 

 

A man is only as big as his average deed - not an inch taller, not an ounce better - when it comes to assigning him his place among his fellows, or to rewarding him in the presence of the judgment angels, before the throne of God; but a man is as big as his faith or his intention, thanks to Jesus Christ and His atoning sacrifice, when it comes to saving the soul of a dying thief on the cross, or, for that matter, the soul of you and me. The reward for deeds done in the body is one thing; Salvation by faith in Jesus Christ is another thing. There shall be millions of people saved so as by fire. They won’t take anything with them, not a bond, not a brick in a mansion, nothing. Everything but their little soul shall be consumed, and it so as by fire, as Lot was out of Sodom. But there are some thousands of [regenerate] people who won’t go in through the [‘strait’] gate. Like Vespasian coming amid triumphant acclaims up the Appian Way, with trophies won in far-off lands, so some heroes of God shall go through the gates as Paul did, with stars of rejoicing in their crown.

 

 

- The Sermon Commentary.

 

 

-------

 

 

SIN

 

 

The non- Christian world has no more understanding of sin than it has of smallpox. One of the hardest things that missionaries have had to do is to convey a true conception of it. No word in any non-Christian language expresses the idea of sin in the sense of moral evil, and missionaries have to do what the disciples of the first century did - take some word or phrase and fill it with a new meaning. Non-Christian religions have never succeeded in establishing a causal connection between religion and conduct. Some of them have theorized about it; but no one of them has effected it. A man may meet all the requirements of modern Buddhist opinion and yet openly violate the most elementary laws of right living. It is considered no moral wrong for a Japanese to visit a brothel, their names registered just as if they were attending an ordinary public function. I myself have seen Buddhist priests coming out of brothels in Tokyo with no appearance of confusion when they saw themselves observed. I was told that when a new resort of vice is to be opened it is not uncommon for priests to dignify the occasion by religious ceremonies. Other Asiatic countries are little if any better. The most obscene things that I saw in two journeys around the world were in the temples of China and India. Confucianism ignores sexual vice which its adherents deem at most a venial offence. The Chinese may have a consciousness of sin; but Dr. Arthur H. Smith declared at the Edinburgh Conference that it had taken him twenty-five years to find a Chinese who had it. Brahmanism puts a premium on lust and cruelty. Untruthfulness, gambling, and a number of other vices are hardly considered by adherents of ethnic faiths.

 

 

                                                                                                            - A. JUDSON BROWN. D.D.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

23

 

MANY CALLED, FEW CHOSEN + 1

 

 

By WILLIAM ARNOT

 

 

 

The exposition suggested by Bengel * is simple, consistent, and clean; and it is, I think, correct. Taking term “called” as signifying not all to whom the call of the Gospel is addressed, but those only who are effectually called - not those who only hear, but those who also obey the call - taking the term in this sense, which is a sober and Scriptural view, he finds that this is not a distinction between saved and lost, but between two classes of the saved.** The called and the chosen are both true disciples of Christ, and heirs of eternal life, and yet there is some distinction between them. Chosen must here therefore mean, what it did sometimes mean in ancient times, and does often mean still, the best of their kind. We constantly speak of “choice” or “select” articles, meaning the most excellent. The phrase, whether used proverbially before Christ’s time or not, is in nature and structure proverbial. He either found it a proverb and used it, or he made it a proverb there and then, for such it essentially is. It seems to have been employed by the Lord on more than one occasion, and differently applied at different times. As we might say among a great number of manufactured articles, all true and genuine few are first-rate so, among a great number of real disciples, few stand out unselfish, unworldly, and Christ-like, honouring their Lord, and making the world wonder. Most, even of those who are disciples indeed, and shall inherit eternal life, are so marred by self-righteous admixtures, and unsanctified temper, and conformity to the world, that their light is dim and their witness inarticulate. In the transaction with the young man from which this parable remotely springs, an analogous expression is employed to indicate a chosen or choice disciple:- “Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast,” etc. (19: 21). The term “perfect” in that text seems to be entirely parallel with “chosen The meaning of both is determined by the main drift of the parable; and the meaning thus given accords with the analogy of faith. “The contrast,” as Olshausen says, “refers to the different relationships which believers themselves hold to the Kingdom of God

 

*[The Greek word ...] “seems, in this passage, where (Matt. 20: 16) it first occurs, to denote not all the saved, but the excellent among them.” The Revised Version retains it only in Matthew 22: 14

 

** So Archbishop Trench:- “Many are called to work in God’s vineyard, but few retain that temper of spirit, humility, and submission to God, which will allow them at last to be partakers of His reward

 

 

Another remarkable confirmation of this exposition is found in the use of the same term - [the same Greek word ...] - in Revelation 2: 14. The word in that passage must have the same meaning that we have attributed to it in the parable. Two reasons, a supreme and subordinate, are given to account for the victory of the Lamb - His own omnipotence, and the trustworthy character of the instruments whom he employs. “The Lamb shall overcome them: for He is Lord of Lords and King of Kings; and they that are with Him are called, and chosen, and faithful If you understand here by [...] chosen by God in the eternal covenant, the logical arrangement becomes obscure. It would be strange if, in enumerating the qualifications of soldiers, one should represent first that they were summoned to the warfare, next that they were chosen for that purpose before, and last they were staunch in the battle-field. If this had been the meaning of [...] it must have stood first in order. The fact that it stands second suggests another explanation. Take it, in the sense which it readily assumes and frequently bears, and the order of the series becomes at once transparent. The soldiers were “called, and choice, and faithfulThey were enlisted in the cause, excellent in character, and found unflinching when the fight began.*

 

* “The three words seem designed to tell us that elect ones out of the three preceding dispensations - the Patriarchal, the Mosaic, the Christian - compose the legions of Christ. Not all the saved compose the army: it is the election from the elect of all dispensations” (Govett).

 

 

So we lift our eyes and see in the heavenlies the most perfectly equipped battalions the world will ever see. Called - summoned to the war; chosen - choice in combat; faithful - staunch in battle: called - singled out by name; chosen - from among others; faithful - by a proved life: called - God-born; chosen - God-filled; faithful - God-crowned. A soldier is said to be faithful who lives up to all the engagements of his commission, who remains true to his commanding officer, and who never sheathes his sword until demobilized by his colonel. It is lovely to know that men and women who have fought and wept alone, ostracized and boycotted and killed for the Word of God, come back in the crowded battalions of the skies, wheeling and advancing in serried formations as no aeroplane squadron ever wheeled, the immortal cavalry of heaven. Martyrs beaten in bleeding driblets return as massed conquerors. - Ed. [D.M.P.]

 

 

-------

 

 

THE EXACTED EYE

 

 

(My right eye, the better of a rather weak pair, was destroyed by a painful inflammation.)

 

 

For threescore years and ten, God’s gift of sight-

Not perfect, but for use and for delight,

Of fullest service - unto me was given,

And through two eyes the golden light of Heaven

Made glory in the earth as in the sky -

The two made one creation through the eye.

The blue ineffable of heavenly birth,

Which, undefiled, o’ercanopied the earth,

Brought heaven to earth, raised earth to heaven again,

Till earth and heaven became one holy fane.

Of sky and land and sea the varied lines

And forms artistic, all the vast designs

Of a Creator infinitely great,

Voiceless proclaimed His Godhead and His State.

The atmosphere’s amazing wizardry,

Whereby the hill, the plain, the field, the tree,

Were in a moment dressed in colours new -

Fresh harmonies of light and shade and hue,

Displayed to me God’s thrilling colour schemes,

Transcending artist’s brush and poet’s dreams.

Yet to be seen in their perfection high,

Asking the trained and consecrated eye.

All nature moved the soul with joyful thrills,

The flashing amber of the pebbly rills,

The purple glory of the heather hills,

The living verdure of the fields and trees

The iridescence of the summer seas,

The changing panoramas of the skies,

The sacred crimson of the still sunrise,

The golden sunsets and the rainbow cloud -

All, through the eyes, God’s presence voiced aloud.

But as the colour-sense of eye and brain

Completes the hues of mountain and of plain,

So to the consecrated heart alone

Is God in presence personal made known;

And, as the consecrated eye doth trace

The unseen God within His dwelling-place,

The gift of sight becomes a means of grace.

Alas! the human heart may basely rest,

Contented with God’s blessings to the blest,

Pleased with the lesser things of time and sense -

With God in the remote circumference!

My Heavenly Father! was it so with me ?

Nay, earth was desert if I saw not Thee;

Her sunniest hours were desolate and drear,

Vacant and homeless, if Thou wert not near

Yet, Father, in Thy love and wisdom dire,

Thou hast dropped down the purgatorial fire.

Two eyes I had for things beneath the sun -

Oh! how I thank Thee, blessed God, for one!

“Pluck out thy right eye if it cause offence

The Saviour said. In stern beneficence

Thou surely hast, O Father, plucked out mine!

But grant me now the wisdom to divine

Thy purposes and will, and realize

My gain in having one, and not two eyes!

Which, a Priori, it must surely be,

Since Thou art Love, and this has come from Thee,

Although Thou didst exact for sacrifice

The better one of my poor pair of eyes!

The answer came - Thy will, Thy will be done -

Henceforward, while I dwell beneath the sun,

Not on the beautiful, but the supernal,

Not on the temporal, but the eternal,

My eye shall gaze, my blinded eye shall gaze

Beyond the now unseen terrestrial rays,

And - marvellous beneficence divine -

The beatific vision may be mine

My loss is gain, rich gain indeed to me,

Farewell ye magic lights of land and sea!

Blind to creation’s glories flung abroad,

With this blind eye I see the face of God

 

 

                                                                                              - J. A. RAMSAY.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

24

 

THE SETTING OF THE JUDGMENT

THRONE + 2

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

It is of extraordinary interest to know exactly what the first-rapt will see in their sudden ascension, when earth will in a moment be dead, and their whole life be transferred to another world. This is exactly the information given us by John. “After these things” - the moment the Church dispensation, as such, is over - “I saw, and behold” - as, passive, he matches a sudden action of God - “a door opened” - not a door opening, but a door already ajar - “in heaven” (Rev. 4: 1), the door of the ascension of saints, which leaves the rest of heaven closed to earth. As it was with the Apostle, so will it be with the faithful at the end: the door of missionary travel had been shut on John; the door also of ministry; the door even of personal liberty: and now a strong up-draught from an impossible world opens a door into the Throne-room of God, the Holy of holies of the universe. “And the first voice which I heard” - the voice which I heard at first, the Lord’s voice - “a voice as of a trumpet speaking with me” - the trumpet-voice which produces rapture (1 Thess. 4: 16) - “Come up hither

 

 

THE THRONE

 

 

The instantaneous, central, superlative vision the rapt will see, the heart of the whole Book, at once stands forth - “BEHOLD, A THRONE John, now inside Heaven, says:- “Straightway I was in the Spirit” - whether in the body, or out of the body, apparently he knew no more than Paul when caught away into the third heaven (2 Cor. 12: 2); seized by the Spirit, as we shall one day be seized by angels: “and behold there was a throne set” - being set - “in heaven”: not long since fixed and settled in this locality and form, but just as it was taking up its rest in this place (Seiss,) “and out of the throne proceed” - proceed constantly, are issuing in flashes - “lightnings and voices and thunders The silent uprush of saints suddenly in Heaven is the signal for the vanishing of the Throne of Grace; and simultaneously a new Throne, already seething and erupting takes charge of the universe. Daniel also foresaw it. “I beheld till thrones were placed, and One that was Ancient of Days did sit: His throne was fiery flames, and the wheels thereof burning fire” (Dan. 7: 9). The epoch of the Churches, the long travail of grace, is over: the Throne - named seventeen times in these two short chapters alone - forms the central Tribunal from which issues at last the descent “in flaming fire, rendering vengeance” (2 Thess. 1: 8).

 

 

THE GODHEAD

 

 

Exactly as we should expect in a real heaven described as it ought to be described - thus utterly unlike all fairy fabrications - the Godhead is indicated, not defined, in loftiest and exquisite mystery. “And [I saw] One sitting upon the throne; and He that sat was to look upon like a jasper stone and a sardius The sardius and the jasper are the first and last stones upon the High Priest’s breastplate (Ex. 28: 17, 20): the First and the Last - He who has neither predecessor nor successor - is one of the titles of Deity (Rev. 22: 13). Orange-hued (perhaps) above, blood-red below - glory and wrath: or, as one has put it - “Below, toward the earth the Person on the Throne appears in the glowing of His function as judge and avenger; above, in the pure splendour of His calm, untroubled, heavenly majesty” (Zullig). Both stones are sometimes blood-red: it is shadowing the unutterably solemn delineation of God in His judgment aspect:- “Our God is a consuming fire” (Heb. 12: 29) * or, as He Himself says - “MY fury shall come up in my face” (Ezek. 38: 18).

 

* “‘Sardius’ is on all hands acknowledged to be fiery red” (Alford).

 

 

THE RAINBOW

 

 

But one phenomenon of overmastering significance at once modifies the judgment scene. “And there was a rainbow round about the throne” - enclosing the supreme tribunal in one stupendous arch - “like an emerald to look upon The danger of the Throne is indescribable; its power is so enormous that even its attendant nobles are enthroned therefore the rainbow - God’s perpetual symbol of remembered mercy - circumscribes the coming judgments sharply within boundaries. The cool green of the rainbow - it is the colour of an undrowned earth - is complementary to the fiery reds and yellows on the Throne, a softening antithesis in the God of 1ove: it is hope seen through storm; it is grace returning after wrath. The rainbow is the answer to the cry of Habakkuk (3: 2):- “I have heard the report of Thee, and am afraid: in wrath remember mercy Grace thus encompasses the God of Wrath; and while the Throne is a throne of judgment, it is not a throne of extermination. Around the Throne that annihilates the universe there is no bow. Moreover, no rainbow is visible (to an observer) until after a storm is past: in the heart of a raging tempest there is no iris: the rapt have Calvary in the background, and all their storms are over for ever.

 

 

THE TORCHES

 

 

Now we touch again upon the mystery of Godhead. “And there were seven torches” - the [Holy] Spirit’s aspect completely changes from the easily extinguished indoor lamps of the churches to the unprotected torches of the Holy Ghost’s relationship to mankind in general - “of fire burning” - the Spirit of judgment, the Spirit of burning (Isa. 4: 4); not light, but flame - “before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God”; and the next chapter (5: 6) adds:- “the seven Spirits of God” - the Holy Ghost is four times so described in the Apocalypse - “sent forth into all the earth.”* Apparently, therefore (it is of intense interest to observe) Joel’s illapse as occurred before rapture. The Spirit is shadowed forth as torches ** :- outdoor flares, fires dangerous to everything flammable, flames to withstand rude blasts; the Spirit in huge revivals, vast plagues and pestilences, sudden lightnings death. “Into all the earth”: for the plagues are world-wide (Rev. 11: 6); the descent of the Spirit is upon all flesh (Joel 2: 28); the graves are everywhere of which it is written - “The Spirit shall quicken your mortal bodies” (Rom. 8: 11); and the earthquakes - the tread of the Spirit - affect all cities of the world (Rev. 16: 19). Thus the Torches of God go flaming through the midnight of Antichrist’s world.

 

* “The Seven Spirits are frequently mentioned, but this is the only passage where such an embassage is ascribed to them” (Bengel): “busied in His world-wide energy, the very word [see Greek word ...] reminding us of the apostolic work and Church” (Alford). It hints Apostles in the last days (Luke 11: 49).

 

** “Seven torches of fire: in this Book does not mean a lamp (see 8: 10), but a torch (cp. John 18: 3)” - Wordsworth.

 

 

THE ELDERS

 

 

Around the Throne now appear the highest of the angelic ranks, the patriarchs of the elder world:- “and round about the throne were four and twenty thrones We read of “the principalities” - princedoms - “and the powers in heavenly places” (Eph. 3: 10); and, in one passage, “THRONES and dominions and principalities and powers” (Col. 1: 16). Here these Thrones are revealed. So, among ‘principalities one powerful angel is Prince of Persia, another Prince of Greece (Dan. 10: 13, 20); and among ‘powers certain angels have power over the winds (Rev. 7: 1), and an angel has power over fire (Rev. 14: 18): thus ‘dominions’ over human nations, or over the elements and forces of nature. But these four and twenty Elder-Angels, patriarchal spirits, are supreme in rank. Even the Presence-angels, like Gabriel, stand in the presence of God: so exalted are these Hierarchs as to sit crowned in the presence of Deity, heading the ranks and leading the worship of “ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands,” (Rev. 5: 11).* Both crowned and vested, as kings and priests in one, the Melchizedeks of heaven, they head the priestly courses of the Temple on high, and share, subordinately, in the government of the universe.

 

* Throned before the Lord returns, and thus long before the coronation saints, they have been enthroned for untold ages: instead of being crowned at the Advent (as they would be, if human victors) they vanish altogether when the [Millennial] Kingdom comes: it is nowhere stated that their robes are made white by blood: they explain who the saints are (Rev. 7: 14), but never point to themselves: if these are not the heads of the angelic hierarchies there are none such visible (strange to say) when heaven is laid bare. If the ‘living ones’ - and their very name defines life - are the Cherubim, their fellow-worshippers, the Elders, cannot be rhetorical symbols. Even when the Great Multitude suddenly appears on high (Rev. 7: 9), after this scene - the first appearance of men in heaven - palms are in their hands, but no crowns are upon their heads. It is impossible that saints should be enthroned when our Lord Himself has not yet received His own [millennial] throne (as distinct from His Father’s); and He does not receive it until Rev. 20: 4, when His fellow-heirs at once appear. The leaders of the worship of the heavenly hosts (Rev. 5: 11) must be of those hosts. (It is curious that the Great War cast down twenty-four thrones.)

 

 

THE CHERUBIM

 

 

So now we reach the most mysterious, indescribable, and significant of all the inmates of heaven under Deity. “And in the midst of the throne” - in the vacant centre of its circle - “and round about the throne, four living beings full of eyes before and behind The Cherubim of Ezekiel, the Seraphirn of Isaiah - beings distinguished from ‘all angels’ (Rev. 7: 11), and never fulfilling ordinary angelic functions - sum up in their own persons - lion, calf, man and eagle - earth’s animate tribes: all of human shape (Ezek. 1: 5), each face presents to God a diverse section of the living: apparently with fluid forms, faces and wings differing at different moments, and (as fire is form varying within limits, shifting and yet remaining its own peculiar flame) a variable embodiment of life, possessed of neither stillness nor rest nor sleep: standing under, or moving about, or hovering over the Throne, the closest attendants of the Godhead: full of eyes, before and behind, their constant vigilance keeps watch and ward, the whole sentient creation, through their eyes, for ever beholding God. They who once guarded Paradise, now for ever watch the way to the Tree of Life, and ceaselessly hold up before the face of God the sentient creation which the Saviour has redeemed.

 

 

THE WORSHIP

 

 

One vital disclosure closes all in a priceless lesson for to-day. Earth is about to be a drama of passionate worship, and organized and universal idolatry: heaven opened reveals the sole ground on which worship can ever be offered.* “Worthy art thou, our Lord and our God, to receive the glory and the honour and the power; for thou didst create all things, and because of Thy will they were” - ceased their nothingness - “and were created” - sprang forth from nothing. The sole Being ever to be worshipped is the Creator. “The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, these shall perish from the earth, and from under the heavens” (Jer. 10: 11). “WORSHIP GOD” (Rev. 19: 10).

 

* How extremely remarkable it is that in the most wondrous disclosure of Heaven ever granted to mortal gaze, in which all prostrate themselves before the Throne, the Seven Spirits never worship, nor even bend: the Holy Ghost is God. That the Seven Spirits are the Divine Spirit is manifest from Rev. 1: 4:- “Grace to you and peace from the Seven Spirits which are before His throne

 

 

-------

 

 

HE CARES

 

 

What can it mean? Is it aught to Him,

That the nights are long and the days are dim!

Can He be touch’d by the griefs I bear,

Which sadden the heart and whiten the hair?

Around His throne are eternal calms,

And strong glad music of happy psalms,

And bliss unruffled by any strife:-

How can He care for my little life?

 

 

And yet I want Him to care for me

While I live in this world where sorrows be.

When the lights die down from the path I take,

When strength is feeble and friends forsake,

When love and music, that once did bless,

Have left me to silence and loneliness,

And my life-song changes to sobbing prayers, -

Then my heart cries out for a God who cares.

 

 

When shadows hang o’er me the whole day long,

And my spirit is bow’d with shame and wrong;

When I am not good, and the deeper shade

Of conscious sin makes my heart afraid,

And the busy world has too much to do

To stay in its course to help me through,

And I long for a Saviour - can it be

That the God of the universe cares for me?

 

 

Oh, wonderful story of deathless love!

His child is dear to that Heart above.

He fights for me when I cannot fight,

He comforts me in the gloom of night;

He lifts the burden, for He is strong,

He stills the sigh and awakens the song:

The sorrows that bow’d me down He bears,

And loves and pardons because He cares.

 

 

Let all who are sad take heart again;

We are not alone in our hours of pain:

Our Father stoops from His throne above

To soothe and quiet us with His love.

He leaves us not when the storm is high

And we have safety, for He is nigh.

Can it be trouble which He doth share?

Oh, rest in peace, for the Lord does care.

 

 

-------

 

 

FOUR WOMEN AND THEIR SONS

 

 

[1] Augustine, perhaps the most renowned saint since Paul, was the son of a heathen father, and Monica, one of the noblest women in the history of Christianity; of an intellectual and spiritual cast, of fervent piety, tender affection, and a deep longing and yearning towards God: a young man of carnal mind, he was brought to God by the Epistles of Paul, and the life-long prayers and tears of his mother. Earlier he had said to his mother: - “Mother, I must be converted some day, for God cannot withstand those tears you have shed for me

 

 

[2] John Chrysostom, patriarch of Constantinople, possible the finest preacher in the twenty centuries of the Church, was reared by his mother, Anthusa, who was a widow at twenty, in the ways of truthfulness and piety. With Monica, she shines as one of the brightest souls of her time, so that a learned heathen was constrained to exclaim to her, “Oh, what wonderful women those Christians have

 

 

[3] Gregory, a spiritual giant of his age, was the son of Nonna, who by her believing prayers and holy life - converted her husband and furnished to the world an illustrious son. It is said of her:- “she was seldom seen, except to attend worship, to carry baskets of food and clothing to the poor, attend the sick, and she was far from visiting the theatre

 

 

[4] Bernard of Clairvaux, of whom Luther said, “Bernard loves Jesus as much as any one can,” was born in France in the tenth century. Aletta, his godly mother, “Born him and trained him, and gave him utterly to God, and in the eagerness of her passioned devotion sought to infuse the mother’s spirit into his veins.” The result of her labours was a true child of God if ever there was one, of whom the historian says the shadows of things eternal was over all he did.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

25

 

THE SERVANTS OF CHRIST AND

THEIR RESPONSIBILITY + 2

 

 

By SIEGFRIED GOEBEL*

 

*Translated from the German by Prof. Banks.

 

 

 

The narrative (Luke 19: 11-27) itself speaks of the setting up of a kingly rule, which, however, was preceded by a journey into a far country, and a consequent prolonged absence of the future king, during which the fidelity of his servants is to be proved on the one hand, and the hate of his fellow-citizens will be revealed on the other. We may here then assume as undoubted, that by this journey of the nobleman Jesus means to represent His own approaching departure from the world, and by his return His own coming again in royal power and glory; and further, that by the nobleman’s servants left behind He would have His own disciples understood, and by his fellow-citizens, His own fellow-countrymen, the citizens of Israel.

 

 

From that retirement of their Lord arises for the disciples of Jesus, as for the servants of the nobleman, an intermediate period, during which they will be without His visible presence, and must wait for His coming. But the period is not given them for idle waiting. It is of the most critical importance for themselves, because it is appointed them as a test-time, on the use of which their own participation in the kingdom of Christ and their position in it will depend. As the nobleman on his departure delivered to ten servants one mina each, commanding them whilst he is initiating his coming as king, to trade with these minae, precisely that in dealing with so slight a sum the fidelity of each one, and his fitness for the royal service, may be seen; so will Jesus, for the intermediate period up to His second advent, hand over to the body of His disciples (the idea of unity lies in the number ten) an apparently inconsiderable gift, and appoint them the duty of working with it for their Lord, while He is far away.

 

 

“Like as (it is with the Parousia of the Son of Man as if) a man, about to journey into another country, called his own servants, [see the Greek words ...] and delivered unto them his goods” (Matt. 25: 14). [the Greek words here ...] is not necessarily the entire property of every kind, and in every place elonging to the householder, but is limited by the context to the property he had in his possession, and under his personal management in his residence so far. Being now about take a journey, he is obliged to hand over this property of which he is unable personally to manage as before, to other faithful hands during the time of his absence. He there: calls, not strange labourers, but his own servants, belonging to him as his servants; and as their master, since he may expect that they will regard his interest as their own, entrusts to them and their hands the property he leaves behind.

 

 

In the investigation on his return, the householder first bestows his praise on the faithful servant, and then promises him his reward, so that the words [Greek words...] belong not so much to the preceding eulogy, as to the following promise of reward, giving its reason, therefore: “Well done, thou good and faithful servant! Over a little thou wast faithful, over much will I set thee” (Matt. 25: 23). He calls him a good and faithful servant: “good” not in the general moral sense, but in his character as servant, therefore a true servant; and since he has especially proved himself such by his fidelity, which is the most prominent virtue of a good servant, the specific “faithful” is combined with the general term “good The promise of reward is to the effect, that because he has been faithful over a little, he will set him over much, just as a servant who has proved his fidelity in the small is trusted with the great. Thus, the comparatively large sum delivered to this servant was but little in comparison with the wealth of goods (money is no longer specially thought of) over which he is now to be set, set as controller, so that he may now deal with them just as independently, despite the householder’s presence, as with the sum of money during the master’s absence. But this, of course, supposes that from the mere position of servant, which he has hitherto held, he is raised to the position of a friend of his master, sharing his full confidence, and taking part in his authority. Hence, to the promise of reward, a saying is added, expressive of

elevation:- “Enter into the joy of thy lord i.e., into the state of joy accruing to him in his character as lord, and in virtue of his authority, so that the servant will have part and lot in his master’s state.

 

 

But great and glorious as is this reward, so heavy, on the other hand, is the punishment that will be inflicted on those who let the word entrusted to them lie dead and useless. For not merely will the Lord leave to the faithful the rich product of their earthly labour even in the future Kingdom of God as their crown of rejoicing, their glory and joy (1 Thess. 2: 19), but He will also over and above reckon to their glory what He takes from the indolent. By exposing the false glory of the latter, as though they had done their duty by merely preserving that which was entrusted to them, and taking that glory from them along with the trust that was theirs, He will still further augment to the faithful the glory and joy which is the result of their faithful labour, so that they will become just as much richer as the others became poorer.

 

 

And to the retribution decreed is added the positive punishment which the householder orders to be inflicted on the profitless servant (ver. 30): “and the useless servant cast forth into the darkness without” (outside the bright festive rooms). Although, therefore, no festal celebration of the householder’s return was expressly mentioned in the narrative before, since the “joy of the lord” (verses 21, 23) cannot be referred to such a feast merely, still the thought of such a celebration so natural and common in other parables, really floats before the narrator’s mind. And whereas the first two servants’ entrance into the joy of their lord evidently includes participation in this festal joy, so the idle servant is to be expelled from the bright rooms of his master’s household. This doom, then, forms in fact the contrast to the eulogistic word to the first two servants: “Enter into the joy of thy lord Christ, in the hour of His coming, besides depriving every idle, unfaithful servant of what was entrusted to him, will also inflict on him the penalty of exclusion from His Kingdom: what Luke says of the punishment of the servant already implies that he has no share in the kingdom of his lord, and therefore that he who is like him will have no share in the Kingdom of Christ.

 

 

And if the hour of Christ’s second advent will be an hour of reckoning even for His disciples, how much more will it he an hour of judgment for His enemies! The citizens of Israel, who hated Jesus, although He lived and worked among them as His countrymen, and who were impelled by their hatred for Him to resistance against the counsel and will of the most high God - what can they be to the Messiah returning from heaven but enemies, and what other fate can the erection of the Messiah’s kingdom bring them than that of rebels, on whom a victorious king takes righteous vengeance? Although members of the chosen nation to which Christ Himself belonged, who as such would have been called in the first rank to enjoy the blessings of the Messianic Kingdom, the manifested Messiah at the setting up of His Kingdom will call them before His tribunal as His foes, and forthwith inflict on them the punishment due to hardened rebels against His divinely ordained eternal kingship - the punishment of condemnation to the eternal death, of whose pain and terrors even the slaying of the rebels in the parable is but a feeble image. When it is said that such an image is unlike the mind of Jesus, this is simply an a priori assertion easily refuted by the numerous passages in which Jesus speaks of the punishment of damnation with no less menacing solemnity, and no less terrible images. That nothing can be meant by the extreme penalty inflicted on the rebels in the parable but the condemnation to eternal death, ought not to have been called in question, considering the clearness and distinctness with which the parable distinguishes the period of the second advent as one of reckoning and judgment, from the intermediate period preceding it as the time of the Lord’s absence in the heavenly world, designed to leave scope to His friends and foes to manifest their love and hate.

 

 

-------

 

 

ALIVE UNTO GOD

 

 

To one who asked him the secret of his service, George Muller said:- “There was a day when I died, ‘utterly died’”; and as he spoke he bent lower, until he almost touched the floor; “died to George Muller, his opinions, preferences, tastes and will; died to the world, its approval and censure, died to the approval or blame even of my brethren and friends; and since then I have studied only to show myself approved unto God

 

 

-------

 

 

CHASTISEMENT

 

 

How fierce the furnace of Thy love, my God!

Where is Thy mercy - Where my Father’s love?

In fear and trembling I embrace the rod,

The sweetness of a Father’s care to prove!

 

 

Spirit of burning! Surely Thou hast come

With Thy refining fire and healing pain

To cleanse Thy temple, make my heart Thy home,

That not for me shall Christ have died in vain.

 

 

O love of God that smitest but to heal,

O burning love that scorchest but to bless,

Say do I murmur at these strokes I feel -

Or are these tears of joy for Thy cross?

 

 

O blessed pain that brings my God so near,

O blessed love that makes the rod so sweet:

If this be God when God would be severe,

What shall it be when Love with love shall meet?

 

 

There is a land where God wipes all our tears:

Ah! leave us there our sorrow for our sin,

Our sorrows for our Saviour’s suffering years,

Our tears that well from deep deep joy within.

 

 

                                                                                                      JAMES A. RAMSAY.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

26

 

THE UNFORGIVABLE BLASPHEMY + 2

 

 

 

Our Lord sets the unforgivable blasphemy in the heart of an all but boundless assurance of mercy as comprehensive as the mind of man can conceive, or even the lips of God can express. “Verily I say unto you” - He who alone has power on earth to forgive sins - “All their sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and their blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme” (Mark 3: 28). It is the largest statement of pardon ever given and the most explicit. And then, in the midst of mercy’s shoreless ocean, the Lord plants one black rock on which a soul can suddenly founder for ever. “But whosoever shall blaspheme against the Holy Spirit hath never forgiveness The dread utterance is all the more startling for its setting: and so constant has been Satan’s use of it, with which to bludgeon souls; so countless the souls driven by a misunderstanding of it to suicide or into the madhouse; and so real the danger that our own souls may sometime be invaded by this nameless terror that it becomes of capital importance to ascertain what exactly is this solitary exception to the law of mercy.

 

 

Now the first outstanding fact is that the sin beyond pardon is a sin of a sharply defined and limited class. “All their sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and their blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme: but whosoever shall BLASPHEME against the Holy Spirit hath never forgiveness” (Mark 3: 28). Blasphemy here forms, the climax of sin, but of sin which can still be forgiven: it is a blasphemy that cannot. Blasphemy - which either degrades God from Deity, or else elevates man to Deity - is, in a created being, obviously a sin of enormous magnitude. As the word ([see Greek ...]) means, it is a sin of the mouth, and so in Matthew (12: 32) the Lord says:- “Whosoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him Thus the unforgivable offence is blasphemy; but not all blasphemy, nor any blasphemy, but a single, solitary blasphemy. How awful the tribute to the power of the tongue, that the only sin which hath never forgiveness the tongue alone can commit!

 

 

Now a second fact of inexpressible importance is that the unforgivable offence is not a grade of sin, but a specific sin; not a prolonged revolt against the Spirit, but an act of final rebellion suddenly flung into words. Our Lord first catalogues ‘all sins and even then ‘all blasphemies as forgivable, irrespective of their maturity or their immaturity, their degree of guilt or ripeness in wickedness; but - He adds - there is one sin catalogued alone, which shall never know pardon.* Thus it is a specific sin, all to itself: it can be committed in a moment, and therefore is not capable of greater or less: before the blasphemy is uttered, the sin is non-existent; and after the words are uttered, it  is unforgivable and eternal [aionios]. This is the complete overthrow of the current view** so dangerous in its paralysing effect. The sin is commonly supposed to be a resistance to the Spirit carried so far that, at last, the heart is too hard to turn. But obvious facts overthrow the view. (1) Resistance to the [Holy] Spirit is not blasphemy of the [Holy] Spirit; (2) thousands of men have resisted the [Holy] Spirit all their life, and been converted at the last; (3) if prolonged sin is the unpardonable blasphemy, all the lost have committed the blasphemy - which is absurd; and (4) if it be a degree of sin, since that degree has never been revealed, no soul could ever know whether he had Committed the sin or not. The Lord sharply differentiates it from all other sins. All sin ultimately reaches a point, beyond which it cannot be forgiven; but that point, our  Saviour says, never falls in this life: but one sin - not a grade of sin, but a specific sin - is excepted at once, here and now.

 

* Dean Alford, rarely tripping, trips here:- “Not a particular act of sin but a state of wilful, determined opposition to the Holy Spirit, is meant.” But blasphemy is utterance, and utterance is not state but action.

 

** For example, Tyndale:- “Sin against the Holy Ghost is despising of the Gospel and His working: where that bideth is no remedy for sin.” The comfort commonly given to souls in distress - namely, that the very distress disproves any irreclaimable hardness - is true; but it is also the further true that total insensibility, the absence of all concern, is no proof whatever that the soul has done the one unpardonable thing.

 

 

Now, therefore, we arrive at the sin itself. It is a peculiar sin: it is not a sin of thought, or of act, but a sin of words: it is blasphemy, but by no means any blasphemy. “All their blasphemies wherewith so ever they shall blaspheme shall be forgiven unto the sons of men Paul says that he had been a ‘blasphemer’ (1 Tim. 1: 13), yet he became not a whit behind the chiefest apostles. Concerning those who, by taunting the dying Saviour upon the Cross, could hardly have been guilty of blacker blasphemy, the Lord Jesus says, “Father, forgive them It is not a blasphemous heart, nor a blasphemous mind, nor a blasphemous thought - though all these necessarily precede the sin - but a blasphemous mouth. If the blasphemy has not been uttered, it has not been committed.* It is one single, isolated, peculiar blasphemy which stands beyond repentance and beyond pardon.

 

* Involuntary utterance (if such ever occurs) under mania or delirium, since it is free of all moral guilt, manifestly neither commits the blasphemy, nor can incur its penalty.

 

 

Our Lord’s revelation evidently sprang out of the incident which drew it forth; for the revelation was never repeated, nor did the incident ever occur again. Therefore, as we should expect, the record itself defines and exhibits the sin once for all. “Whosoever shall blaspheme against the Holy Spirit hath never forgiveness: BECAUSE they said, He hath an unclean spirit” (Mark 3: 29). It is not sin against the Spirit, but blasphemy against the Spirit: it is not ‘grieving’ the Spirit, or ‘resisting’ the Spirit, or ‘quenching’ the Spirit, but BLASPHEMING the Spirit; and what the Pharisees had just done is the sin. “They said, He hath an unclean spirit To say that Christ worked His miracles by Satanic power is - for reasons, in their entirety, known only to God - unpardonable for ever. The Lord had just said, “I by the Spirit of God cast out demons”; “this man the Pharisees retorted, “doth not cast out demons, but by Beelzebub, the prince of the demons”: “THEREFORE” - Jesus now says - “I say unto you, the blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven” (Matt. 12: 24-32).* The effect is instantaneous. In the very next chapter the Lord withdraws sternly into parables, “LEST they turn and I should heal them” (Matt. 13: 15): the door they banged, God locks: faces were moving before the Lord in that crowd that could never be whitened.

 

* So John Wesley:- “Nothing is more clear in the Bible than that the sin is ascribing those miracles to the power of the Devil which Christ wrought by the power of the Holy Ghost.” So Godet:- “The impious audacity of putting the holiness of His works to the account of the spirit of evil - this is what He calls blaspheming the Holy Spirit.” So also Athanasius:- “They who sin thus refer the work of God to the Devil; they judge God to be the Devil; and the true God to have nothing more in His works than the Evil Spirit

 

 

Probably the bottom reasons why this is a sin past all cure lie buried in Omniscience, in a region where mortal foot has never trod. No great truth is without, attached to it somewhere, an insoluble problem. But one reason (though only removing the problem one step further back) is given in a pregnant fragment recorded by Mark. “Whosoever blaspheme against the Holy Spirit hath never forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin He will never, for all eternity be anything but a blasphemer: he has forged a chain which can never be broken: he can never be freed from the virulent activity of the blasphemy, and therefore can never be absolved from its penal fires. The man has become a Satan. So, therefore, “it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this age, nor in that which is to come” (Matt. 12: 32): for there is no statement, anywhere, of forgiveness in the ages to come; and pardon in the Millennial Age - either at the Bema, or among the Millennial nations - closes all pardon for ever. No word could more plainly annihilate Universalism, establish eternal punishment, demonstrate the Godhead of the Holy Ghost, or prove the overwhelming necessity of Christ.

 

 

Now, therefore, there stretches before us the boundless shore of infinite mercy, the solitary black rock having sunk beneath the horizon. The relief to an anxious soul cannot be put into words. Satan triumphs absolutely the moment he convinces a man he has committed a sin which can never be pardoned; whereas the very despair of a soul - its unpardonableness, as it thinks - can be the first stage in salvation. In the only case known to us in all history of souls that could not be forgiven, they did not know it, did not believe it when told, and never displayed the remotest anxiety.* It is unreasonable, it is wicked, to hold oneself unpardonable for any sin which Christ says is pardonable; and He says all is pardonable except a sin which I have not committed: therefore my sin - absolutely irrespective a what it is - can vanish in a moment in the Blood of Christ. God never says that He pardons because there is little sin to parson; or because the sin has not gone too far; or because the sin is not too foul: “ALL their sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of mem, and their blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme.**

 

* The monstrous malice which, with the spotless perfection and the overwhelming miracles of the Son of God actually before its eyes, and the voice of the Holy Ghost in unique plentitude calling loudly in the heart on the spot, could deliberately and studiedly Satanize Christ is a malice which - though the future tense our Lord uses (Mark 3: 29) may imply repetition - it would be very hard to repeat. It is a sin of which not even a Celsus, or a Julian, or a Voltaire, or an Ingersoll was ever guilty. Moreover, that it may be impossible to renew a soul to repentance (Heb. 6: 6) is not to say that his sin would not be forgiven, if he repented; and it is only loose, unjustified, erroneous exposition which making that unpardonable which Christ never made unpardonable, has driven many souls insane. The tragedies of sin are sufficiently awful without our creating, through carelessness, fresh artificial horrors.

 

** The single phrase - ‘eternal sin’ - is decisive of the eternal duration of at last some punishment; for if punishment on crime is right at all, the punishment must last as long as the crime lasts. The textual authority is decisive. “Griesbach favours the reading, Lachman and Tischendorf adopt it in their entire editions, and Alford and Meyer unhesitatingly accept it. Of the five oldest manuscripts, four, comprising the very oldest and best of all, read ‘sin,’ supported by nearly all other versions. Tregelles coincides with Lachmann and Tischendorf” (Samuel C. Bartlett, D.D.). The Revised Version gives it with no alternative.

 

 

-------

 

 

RETURNING MEDIEVALISM

 

 

“Recent investigations by the Howard League of Penal Reform into prison conditions in various parts of Europe reveal a state of things which most horrify civilised people. Most of us know that the war has strengthened reaction in countries where it once showed signs of taking root, and that there are regimes which attempt to stabilize their power by an organized system of terrorism. But it will be a revelation to many people that man and women charged with purely political offences, as well as those suspected of felonies, may in many parts of Europe - [and in other places today] - remain in prison without trial for indefinite periods, that the conditions of imprisonment are in some cases so terrible that the less strong-minded are in some cases driven to insanity, and that torture, which we commonly regard as medieval barbarity, is to-day in parts of Europe once again a regular instrument of police procedure. The Governments which employ these methods do not invite publicity. Political prisoners undergoing long sentences are kept in iron cages or in prison cells the size and shape of coffins, women are under the constant surveillance of male wardens, prisoners are beaten on the soles of their feet until unable to stand, and “confessions” extorted with clubs and even red-hot irons. Political prisoners are gradually starved to death.”

 

 

·             The Manchester Guardian.

 

 

-------

 

 

CHURCH WEALTH

 

 

From many years’ experience I have learned that sanctified wealth will always prove a blessing to the Church of God; but unsanctified wealth, though poured into the Church by the million, never fails to corrupt and curse the Church. If our wealthy people will come themselves and bring their wealth, and consecrate the whole without any reserve to God, it is almost incalculable the instrumental good that can and will result to the cause of religion; but, on the other hand, if religion must be defeated, the obligations of the Gospel loosened, the rules of the Church not exacted, a time-serving ministry employed and supported, this is, and has been, the death-knell to all Churches, so far as inward piety is concerned.

 

 

Look at the needless, not to say sinful, expenditure in our older cities and country districts; the unnecessary thousands expended, not in building needful and decent churches, for this is right, but ornamental churches, to make a vain show and gratify pampered pride. Look at the ornamental pulpits, pewed and cushioned seats, organs, and almost all kinds of - [modern devices and] - instruments, with salaried choirs, - [and organists] - and as proud and graceless - [in christian behaviour] - as a fallen ghost, while millions upon millions of our fallen race are dying* daily, and peopling the regions of eternal [and millennial] woe for the want of the [complete] Gospel of Jesus Christ; and scarce as - [well-informed, and Holy Spirit indwelt (Acts 5: 32; 1 John 3: 24ff., R.V.)] - ministers are in some places in our own happy country, yet there are thousands that are ready and willing to go to the utmost verge of this green earth, and carry the glad tidings of mercy to those dying millions, if they had the means of support.

 

[* See Revelation 3: 1-3:- “And by the MESSENGER of the CONGREGATION in Sardis write; These things says HE who HAS the SEVEN Stars, I know Thy works, That thou hast a Name That thou livest, and THOU ART DEAD. [2] Become vigilant, and strengthen the remaining THINGS which were about to die; for I have not found Thy works fully performed in the presence of my God. [3]

 

 

Would it not the better comport with the obligations of our holy Christianity to refrain from these superfluous expenditures, and with a liberal hand and devoted heart apply, or furnish the means to carry the glad tidings of salvation - [both present (Acts 4: 11, 12), and also future (1 Peter 1: 5, 9, R.V.)] - to those that sit in the region and shadow of moral death, than to apply them, as is done in many directions in this Christian land? Say, ye professed lovers of Jesus Christ, are not your responsibilities tremendously fearful? There is wealth enough in the Churches, and among the friends of the different Christian denominations, if rightly husbanded and liberally bestowed, to carry the Bible and a living ministry - [with all the truth, which the Holy Book teaches] - to every nation on the face of the whole earth.

 

 

                                                                                                                      - PETER CARTWRIGHT.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

27

 

THE JOY SET BEFORE HIM + 1

 

 

By W. P. CLARK

 

 

 

Many books have been written, and many addresses delivered at Conferences on the subject of the Second Advent, which dwell on the joy of the Redeemed, when they see their Lord face to face and shall reign with Him; but few dwell on His joy, which must be infinitely greater than ours, inasmuch as He has infinitely greater capacity for joy. How great will be His joy may be measured by what He had to “endure” to obtain it. For the joy set before Him He endured the Cross despising the shame (Heb. 12: 2); but “none of the ransomed ever knew how deep were waters crossed, nor how dark was the night the Lord passed through ere He found that Joy.

 

 

See Him as He goes up Calvary Hill “so marred from the form of man in His aspect, that His appearance was not that of a Son of man* With bruised back from the terrible scourging, with blood-stained face from the Cross of thorns, with bent form from the weight of the Cross, “He endured the Cross A beautiful legend tells us that the woman, had been “bowed together, and could in no wise lift up herself” until He laid His hands upon her and “she was made straight came up to Him, as He staggered under the load of the Cross, and wiped with her handkerchief the blood and sweat from His face. She knew what it was to suffer with a bent back, and to be jeered at by a multitude!

 

* Isa. 52: 14. See Scofield Bible and R.V. margin.

 

 

And how can the agony of the Crucifixion be possibly pictured or even imagined? Intense as must have been the physical suffering, to which were added the jeers and taunts of the Chief Priests and the multitude, in which no doubt the invisible powers of darkness joined, how much more must have been the appalling, unimaginable suffering carried by the absolutely sinless, spotless Son of God, being “made sin” for us, and as such, forsaken of His Father, a fact wringing from His lips that heart-rending cry,- “My God, my God, why has Thou forsaken Me

 

 

But He also despised the shame. When King David sent messengers to condole with Hanun, King of Ammon, on the death of his father, we read that he shaved off half their beards and cut off their garments in the middle, and “the men were greatly ashamed” (1 Chron. 19: 5): how much greater must have been the shame of hanging on a cross exposed to the gaze of the crowd! “He endured the shame

 

 

The other side of the picture - the joy set before Him - still lies in the future. John in the lonely isle of Patmos saw it in vision. “And I saw, and I heard the voice of many angels, and the number of them was 10.000 times 10,000, and thousands of thousands (that is, millions), saying with a great voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive the power and riches and wisdom and might and honour and glory and blessing. And every created thing which is in the heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and on the sea, and all things that are in them, heard I saying, Unto Him that sitteth on the throne, and unto the Lamb, be the blessing, and the honour, and the glory, and the dominion, for ever and ever” (Rev. 5: 11-13). “And after these things, I saw, and behold, a great multitude, which no man could number, out of every nation and of all tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne, and before the Lamb arrayed in white robes and palms in their hands, and they cry with a great voice saying, Salvation unto our God who sitteth on the throne, and unto the Lamb. And one of the elders said unto me, These are they that came out the great tribulation and they washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb” (Rev. 7: 9-14).

 

 

Paul looked forward to meeting his comparatively few converts, at the coming of the Lord Jesus, as his “joy” and crown - how much greater will be the “joy” of his Lord when He meets His blood-bought converts, in multitude more than man can number! Then shall He see of the travail of His soul and be satisfied. But the consummation of His Joy will no doubt be when He shall reign for a thousand years with those counted worthy to reign with Him. Who then will “enter into the joy” of their Lord? and who will hear Him say, “Well done, good and faithful servant, thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will set thee over many things”? Thank God, this wonderful joy rests not on great achievements, nor special genius, but on faithfulness; so the weakest and poorest disciple has a chance to achieve it. Alas, for those servants - servants still, but found unfaithful - who shall be “cast into the outer-darkness outside the bright Millennial Kingdom until the thousand are ended!

 

 

A dramatic incident occurred at a wedding in England. The bridegroom, Williarn Montague Dyke, had been blinded by an accident when ten years of age, but had, despite his blindness, won University honours, and had also won a beautiful bride, though he had never looked on her face. Shortly before his marriage he submitted to treatment by experts, and the climax came on the day of his wedding. The bride entered the Church leaning on the arm of her white-haired father, Admiral Cave. There stood her future husband with his father and the great oculist, who was cutting away the last bandage. A beam of rose-coloured light from a pane in the chancel window fell across his face, but he did not seem to see it. With a cry of joy he sprang forward to meet his bride. “At last! At last!” he uttered, and gazed the first time on the face of the girl he loved. How far greater will be the joy of the Heavenly Bridegroom, when He shall present His bride - [out from amongst * the] - the Church “without blemish, in exceeding joy, before the presence of His Glory To Him be the glory, majesty, dominion and power before all time and now and for evermore!

 

[* NOTE: The ‘Church’ is composed of all the redeemed; but the ‘Bride’ of Christ are taken out from amongst His redeemed “Body” or “family”. (Gen 24; Rev. 19: 7, 8., R.V.): a selection from amongst a previous selection. ]

 

 

-------

 

 

THE DURATION OF THE PAROUSIA

 

 

The second coming, like the first, is complex and distributive, extending through a variety of successive and diverse scenes, stages, events, and manifestations, requiring as many, if not still more, years. Just what length of time will intervene between the first and sudden catching away of the watching and ready saints, and the final overthrow of Babylon and Antichrist. We may not be able to precisely to determine; but I am fully persuaded that it will be a goodly number of years.”* Antichrist reigns for a full seven years - three and a half as the friend and patron of Israelitish people, and three and a half as the great Beast. (Dan. 9: 27; Rev. 11: 2; 12: 6). But the Antichrist does not appear at all amid the scenes of the Apocalypse until after the seven seals have been opened, and six of the succeeding trumpets have been sounded. How many years those seals and six trumpets may consume we are not informed, but we have every reason to believe that they may be counted ny tens, if not by ecores, subsequent to the opening of the door in heaven and the taking up of the saints, which is the first act in the great drama. Forty years, at least, perhaps the whole jubilee period of fifty years, or even a full seventy years, answering to the period during which the judgment was upon Israel for its sins, are likely to be embraced in what the Scriptures call the day of the Lord, and the second coming and ‘bodily] revelation of Jesus Christ.  - J. A. SEISS, D.D.

 

[* NOTE: This tract was published during on March 15th 1930.

 

Many Christians believe today (2024), that prophetic calculations should begin from the date of our Lord’s Death, instead of from His Birth and Incarnation. This fact alone should be a great encouragement for all prophetic Bible students today, to better understand Hosea’s prophecy: “After two days” (i.e., after two thousand years (2 Pet. 3; 8, 9, R.V.) - “will he revive us:” - {i.e., Jews and the nation of Israel} - “on the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live before him. And let us know, led us follow on to know the LORD; his going forth is sure as the morning: and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter rain that watereth the earth” (Hos. 6: 2, 3, R.V.)]

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

28

 

WARNING THE CHURCH OF GOD + 2

 

 

By WILLIAM LEASK, D.D.

 

 

 

Instead of the apostasy of Christendom, characterized by daring impiety and atheism, under the leadership of the Man of Sin, the Son of Perdition, popular teaching represents the gradual triumph of the Gospel over every nation and tribe, until all mankind shall become Christian, and the Church be co-extensive with the human race. This is the picture which the pulpit delights to exhibit, and a very beautiful picture it is. In skilful hands it is sometimes executed with such ingenuity that the moral landscape of the nations seems to laugh before us under the sunlight of spiritual beauty. For imagination, poetry, graphic detail, and bursts of enthusiastic eloquence, it offers an exceedingly fruitful theme. But there is this drawback - it is not true! The Holy Ghost “speaketh expressly” against it. It is not only not the predicted issue of Christian testimony, so far as the nominal Church and the world are concerned, but that issue is directly the reverse - apostasy, direful wickedness, impiety, blasphemy, atheism, doom! For mercy spurned, and grace refused, the end of the age is terrible “judgment For disobedience to the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, the close of the dispensation is characterized by unprecedented wickedness culminating in unparalleled judgments. The day of long-suffering is ended by “the wrath of the Lamb

 

 

Responsibility! Merciful Saviour, look upon Thy ministers! What will the deceived people say of them, and to them, when the story of “Peace, peace is interrupted by the uprising of the Man of Sin, and the imperious demand that all shall worship him, and deny the Father and the Son? “Sir, you deceived me! You taught me to laugh at the millenarian doctrine. You said that Christ would not come until the end of the world; that the Gospel would  convert the nations, and that the idea of a personal Antichrist was a dream, and an absurdity. You deceived me; and now I must either worship this blasphemer or die!” Can one imagine such a speech as this without horror?

 

 

But is it really a matter of revelation that Christians who are looking for the coming of the Lord shall escape the predicted horrors of the atheistic domination? Our Lord, speaking of the day that shall come as a snare on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth, says:- “Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man” (Luke 21: 36). This intimation that His - [chosen, selected, and] - watchful disciples shall escape the terrors of the closing scene, when the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled (for it is to that period, and not to the destruction of Jerusalem, that these words point), is one of the things which the Holy Ghost brings frequently to the minds of the Apostles. “For when they shall say, Peace and safety, then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief” (1 Thess. 5: 2-4, 8-10). The contrast here between those who shall not escape, and those who shall be saved from the day of wrath, is very striking. The salvation which the latter are to obtain, is of course, salvation from the tremendous terrors of that day. Spiritual salvation it is not, for that they have already. It is the righteous taken away from the evil to come. “Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken” - graciously, as in John 14: 3, “I will come again and receive you unto myself” - “and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken* and the other left” (Matt. 24: 40, 41). Those who are “left” shall be exposed to the tempest, before the bursting of which on the earth the others are “taken

 

* In these Scriptures it is [see the Greek...], to take as a companion, not [Greek ...], to seize (for judgment) as in Matthew 25: 39, etc.

 

 

The Vials of wrath will not be poured forth until those who ‘wait for the Lord’ are taken to safety. “Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from he hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth” (Rev. 3: 10). Most remarkable is this verse, [see the Greek clause...] - “the word of my patience”; what a revelation there is here of the dispensation of grace, and of the certainty that, in consequence of grace rejected, it will end in judgment; and what a proof that to look and wait for the patient, long-suffering Saviour is the duty and privilege of the - [repentant and obedient] - believer - an attitude which is to be rewarded by removal from the scene of trial before the Apocalyptic judgments descend upon the earth.

 

 

Now if these two momentous truths- namely, that Christendom ends in apostasy, and that those who wait for the Lord will be gathered lovingly to Himself before the judgment due to that apostasy descends upon the world - were presented to our congregations, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the indifference to the sublime realities of the Gospel, the sleep, the deadness of which the complaint is so lamentably general, would, to a great extent, disappear. The law of Heaven is - God’s blessing on His own truth. A faithful exhibition of that truth, therefore, is the bounden duty of all ambassadors of Christ. The great realities of the Gospel should be presented to men as things wonderfully near, not as things afar off, or cold abstractions concerning which curiosity may speculate. And if the day of grace, the era of divine long-suffering, is rapidly coming to a close; if the Gospel dispensation, like its Edenic, patriarchal, and Aaronic predecessors, is to end in apostasy ; and if the new epoch of royal rule by the manifested Messiah, with the Church of the first-born ones as His co-assessors, converted Israel as His ministers of salvation to the nations, and the entire world as His empire, is just about to begin, the necessity of fidelity to God’s revelation, always pressing, is now vehemently imperative.

 

 

The great crisis to which all generations and all the purposes of God have been tending is near at hand. To talk now about the respective merits of ecclesiastical systems is a waste of precious time, for they are all doomed to dissolution that the sons of God may be manifested in glory with Him who is at once their Redeemer, their life, their Elder Brother, and their Head. To insist now upon form, and ceremony, and ritual is perfect madness, for the Bridegroom cometh; those who are ready will go in with Him to the marriage, and the door will be shut. We have had trifling enough; let us now be in earnest, and give Christ such a place in our hearts as He never. had before, so that the prospect of His coming may fill us with hope and joy!

 

 

-------

 

 

THE SECOND COMING

 

 

Some day the last lone man will lie and stare

At death, and know that in him ends the scheme

Of life on earth, that thought itself supreme;

And he will die no one left to care.

All forms of life that once swarm’d anywhere

Will vanish as the memories of a dream,

And the great winds of silence then will stream

Through the vast hollows of the darken’d air.

 

 

And after this quick life we once call’d ours

Has pass’d will the world travail in some storm

Of restless element and fill the crust

With breathing earth again: wild beasts and flowers?

And will some curious life in some strange form

Dig down and read this story of our dust?

 

 

PAUL ENGLE.

 

 

-------

 

 

AN EPISCOPAL MANIFESTO

 

 

(By the Bishops of the Southern Methodist Church)

 

 

The first and essential mission of the Church of Jesus Christ is to proclaim the message of the love of God for lost, sinful men and women. If the world is not lost, the Church has no mission. If the world is not lost, Jesus Christ is not the Divine Saviour. If the world is not lost, Christ’s declarations of search and sacrifice for the lost are meaningless and futile. “There is none other name given under heaven among men whereby we must be saved

 

 

This is the one, the vital word to bring to-day to all our people, ministers and laymen. Every other matter however important must give precedence to the earnest, sincere, vigorous, churchwide proclamation of this old-fashioned, unchangeable, uncompromising, loving, saving gospel:- Sin, conviction of sin; repentance with godly sorrow, and forsaking of sin; acceptance of Christ - “The Lamb of God” as the only, the all-suffcient Saviour from the guilt and power of sin, eternal life, over-coming, victorious, triumphant as the privilege and joy of the child of God, who has come back from the far country and is once more in the Father’s House.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

29

 

WORKING OUT OUR SALVATION  + 1

 

 

 

One mighty text is a shining example of the double-edged Sword of the Spirit. For Inspiration is a single blade which can cut in completely opposite directions; and so two schools of thought shelter under this text’s balanced clauses: two schools of thought that are sharply opposed; and each seems to imagine that the clause on which it fastens has annihilated the clause which it opposes. But this is not so. The two clauses are twin pillars on the threshold of the Temple of Truth. “WORK OUT YOUR OWN SALVATION” - that is Jachin: “IT IS GOD THAT WORKETH IN YOU” - that is Boaz. It may on occasion be impossible for the human intellect to reconcile God’s opposing truths perfectly: but the acme of wisdom lies in acting on a fact of almost limitless importance - that BOTH are TRUE, and that both are simultaneously true; and the crowning life, and the only crowned life, is the passionate embodiment of both. Width of mental outlook is only less valuable than catholicity of heart-affection.

 

 

But first we need to define carefully what Scripture means by salvation. Salvation is a term which, as used in the New Testament, is immensely more comprehensive than our common use of it, and it covers man’s total redemption. “Salvation as Calvin says, “is taken to mean the entire course of our calling, and includes all things by which God accomplishes our perfection.” Scripture says “ye are saved” (Eph. 3: 8); “we are [being] saved” (Rom. 8: 24); and “we shall be saved” (Rom. 5: 9) in “a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time” (1 Pet. 1: 5). For it is obvious that God’s complete work covers (1) a past pardon and recreation; (2) a present deliverance from the dominion of sin; and (3) a future redemption of body and environment: or, as we may summarize them - justification, sanctification, and resurrection.

 

 

Now it is obvious, by the terms he uses, that Paul assumes the first, or fundamental, salvation as already past. For he addresses his words to “all the saints in Christ Jesus” (Phil. 1: 1), who have been made saints by being saved; and it is to them that he says - “work out” - carry through, completely finish - “your own salvation” - the salvation which you already possess, and which you must work out for yourselves; “for it is God who worketh IN YOU” - as souls indwelt of the Holy Ghost. God works from without the unbeliever, never from within: therefore Paul, speaking to the whole Church of God, says - Work out what God has already worked in; liberate the resident dynamic, so that it becomes a flood diffused and directed throughout the life.

 

 

So now, with a cleared platform, we confront JACHIN. “Work out” - as though the solitary worker was yourself  - “your own salvation” - the present and the future deliverance which turn upon your own action - “with fear” - towards God - “and trembling” - towards yourself. “The words speak of holy anxiety, overmastering conscientiousness, all-absorbing sense of responsibility” (J. Hutchison, D.D.). That is, mere passivity is never a doctrine of God. Even our original [and eternal] salvation, a work absolutely finished before we touch it, has to be actively - sometimes urgently or even passionately - seized; “I never knew a lazy man saved in my life,” says Mr. Moody and it ushers us at once into an activity that is to cease only with death. “The kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and MEN OF VIOLENCE take it by force” (Matt. 11: 12). So Paul, once again embodying all Christian experience in himself, says:- “All run, but one receiveth the prize: even SO RUN, that ye may attain. I therefore so run, as not uncertainly: I buffet my body, and bring it into bondage: lest by any means, after that I have preached to others, I myself should be disapproved” (1 Cor. 9: 24). All the self-effort, all the self-mastery are locked up in one breast - my own, born of a great fear; for the runner who has lost the tremor has probably lost the race. And yet the current laid along the trembling wire is God.

 

 

For now we confront BOAZ; and the revelation is overwhelming. “For it is God which worketh in you”; energizes, works mightily, works effectually; and He works inside your personality. The Greek, by dropping the article and putting the word ‘God’ first, casts the whole emphasis on the Godhead: it is DEITY which worketh in you: over against the sore difficulties which rightly make us tremble - our discouragements, our depressions, our slothfulness, our falls, our despair - Paul draws the veil from the far more gigantic power latent within. The engine that throbs within, like the huge electric drill used to break up concrete blocks as it quivers with the enormousness of its own power, is God: the intelligent force within us that unshackles our will, so that we may will good, and energizes our hand, so that we may do good, is God. This revelation, which we take as a commonplace of our theology, is simply overwhelming in its immensity  for it means that, within the limits of our personality and destiny, nothing is impossible to us that is possible to God.

 

 

Once more, and finally, Paul sinks still deeper in the fathomless revelation. “It is God which worketh in us both to will and to do” - both the resolution and the performance: to will, the whole realm of the soul; to do, the whole realm of the life - “of His good pleasure” - the good pleasure that is pure goodness. This meets the profundities of our psychological need. A patient in a hospital ward is ordered to do a thing, and the thing is not done: the nurse says ‘He won’t’; the patient says, ‘I can’t’: the doctor comes in and says something quite different from either - ‘He cannot will.’ God not only empowers the act, but inspires the resolution behind the act. All resolve to do good is from God, and; all ability to do good is from God: therefore both the vision of the ideal, and the ability to achieve it, are actually in us, in the person of God resident in the soul. God is where thought starts, and where the will resolves, and where love is born, and where Christ is formed in the fountains of life. An epitaph on a Christian worker’s grave runs thus:- “She hath done what she couldn’t

 

 

So then in this double-barrelled truth we get an extraordinary example of the balance of opposed truths making Truth, and a revelation, in itself, of incalculable power. For the very text which isolates the all-absorbing energy of God as our sole dynamic is also the text in which salvation is made contingent on our own effort; and conversely, the text of all texts which most categorically asserts that we must work out our own salvation is the text which also reveals that our hidden and only dynamo is God. Our effort without God is an electric wire empty of the electric fluid: God working without us is a power-house with a disconnected wire.*

 

* The Church in general seems to hold neither truth absorbingly, but half-behaves, half- doubts, both: that is, we must work out our salvation, but nothing of the first importance is lost if we do not, and God is the great In-worker, but choked channels are of no great consequence.

 

 

Paul finally unveils the golden possible goal of this conjoint working of God and the soul. “Do all things” - live all your life - “without murmurings” - constant complaint, constant criticism, constant dissatisfaction - “and disputings”: disputing with oneself, that is, intellectual indecisions, indecisive convictions, puzzling doubts; “that ye may become * blameless and harmless, children of God WITHOUT BLEMISH.” Children of God you already are [by regeneration]; but ‘become such children of God as have nothing with which fault can be found’ (H. A. W. Meyer). You can work out your salvation, says the Apostle, for it is God that worketh in you; for He “is able to guard you from stumbling, and to set you before the presence of His glory WITHOUT BLEMISH in exceeding joy” (Jude 24).

 

* Lange:- [The Greek word ...] “marks the end, - [and the other Greek word ...] - the way, which is a becoming, a process of development

 

 

-------

 

 

THE APPROACHING TRIBULATION

 

 

The power to foretell the future - that is, pure, undiluted prophecy - inheres in God alone, and in those to whom, in ages of inspiration, He grants it. For this is the challenge with which Jehovah meets all demon forces:- “Declare the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods” (Isa. 41: 23). For this reason all prophecies by demons are, in themselves, worthless. Nevertheless it is also true that owing to their wide range of vision, the mass of data they possess for intelligent anticipation, and their vast experience of cause and effect, the predictions of evil spirits, while valueless in themselves, carry weight when accompanied by signals revealed in the Word of God; and the evil watchers in the unseen now make no secret of the coming night. The announcement of “a great world cataclysm at hand,” Sir A. Conan Doyle says reaches him “from more than a hundred independent sources” in the unseen world, all over the earth.

 

 

*       *        *

 

 

30

 

COMING MIRACLE + 3

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

It is an extraordinary fortification of the heart, in days of upheaval and dark foreboding, to realize God’s enormous resources foretold as stored up against the day of battle and storm. The coming irruption of Divine miracle is one such. A deepening necessity is creating the vacuum into which miracle must rush back at last. The steady growth of the Satanic miraculous, to culminate in “great signs and wonders” (Matt. 24: 24), requiring corresponding counter-miracle (2 Tim. 3: 8, 9); the growing inadequacy of the old natural apparatus to meet modern supernormal conditions; the explicit prophecies of supernatural ambassadors of Heaven at the End, especially prophets (Joel 2: 28); persecutions yet to come so involving bombing and gassing as to be met at last only miraculously (Rev. 11: 5), unless Divine testimony is to be absolutely quenched:- all will compel what Scripture has foretold. God’s resources are equal to all coming emergencies; and whether the Church (in whole or in part) will then have been removed, though a question of absorbing interest in itself, need not and ought not to deflect our minds from the splendid vision of returning miracle. What the Most High has done already, He will do again:- “By a prophet the Lord brought Israel up out of Egypt, and by a prophet was he preserved” (Hos. 12: 13).

 

 

CHRIST

 

 

Now in a type more informative (perhaps) than any other in the Bible, we have the master-clue to it, given by the Holy Ghost Himself. “These things happened unto them by way of figure” - that is, the Wilderness experiences were a kindergarten forecast of us; and “they drank of a spiritual* rock, and the ROCK was CHRIST” (1 Cor. 10: 4, 11). Jehovah stood on the rock, thus identifying Himself with it; apparently visibly, and so it must have been Christ, the Jehovah Angel: and as Moses, the embodiment of the Law, took the rod of judgment - “the rod wherewith thou smotest the river” (Ex. 17: 5) - and struck the rock in sight of the Elders of Israel, so on the Cross the curse of the Law its whole judgment, fell upon the Lord, again in sight of tile Elders of Israel; and from the gash of the falling rod came the gush of the living waters. Jesus, Paul says, was “made a curse, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit” (Gal. 3: 13). The Cross was the Rod which changed the river to dead blood (Ex. 7: 20), and so released the Spirit from the rock: “One of the soldiers with a spear pierced His side, and straightway there came out blood and water” (John 19: 34). Therefore Peter, at Pentecost, says, “This is that which hath been spoken by Joel, I will pour forth of my Spirit: He hath poured forth this, which ye see and hear” (Acts 2: 16, 33).

 

* “For the sense of - [the Greek word ...] - for ‘typical’- ‘seen in the light of the Spirit’ - see Rev. 11: 8” (Dean Stanley).

 

 

PENTECOST

 

 

So therefore, the Lord Jesus Himself explicitly unfolds the type. “Jesus stood and cried, If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink: but this spake He of the Spirit, which they that believed on Him were to receive: for no ‘spirit’ was yet” - there was, as yet, no miraculous gift* “because Jesus was not yet glorified” (John 7: 37). That is, after Pentecost, the believer, like His Lord, would become a rock out of which would rush rivers of inspiration and power. For two post-Calvary actions of the Holy Ghost are revealed: - (1) an inrush, or drinking - an internal draught; the water conveyed the rock to the drinking soul: and (2) an out-rush, an impetuous gush of miracle; the Spirit made visible. The one corresponds to the entering in of the Spirit, to dwell: the gushing out of the Spirit, after imbibing, is - naturally - “the manifestation of the Spirit” (1 Cor. 12: 1) in miraculous gift and power. All the desert water was locked up in the rock: no drop of the Holy Ghost is in unregenerate man. It would seem as if the Psalmist makes separate references to the two ruptures of the Rock, for only in the first does he name the smiting:- “Behold, he smote the rock, that waters gushed out, and streams overflowed” (Ps. 78: 20) then later, - “He opened the rock, and waters gushed out they ran in the dry places like a river” (Ps. 105: 41).**

 

 

* No ‘gift’ of the Spirit, no charisma: so Paul says, - “Ye are zealous of ‘spirits’” (1 Cor. 14: 12), where manifestly he means impartations of the one Spirit, the miraculous gifts of the context; and again,- “the ‘spirits’ of the prophets” - their miraculous urge to utterance - “are subject to the prophets” (1 Cor. 14: 32).

 

** As the body knows no death more awful than the death by thirst, and as no agony on the Cross drew a cry from the Lord but thirst, so vital, so overpowering by the very nature of its constitution, is the human soul’s need of the Holy Spirit, the living water.

 

 

LAPSE OF MIRACLE

 

 

Now we come to an element in the Wilderness type only less remarkable than the Church experience it foreshadows. Silence in a type - the deliberate suppression of certain facts - is an integral part of the type, the Spirit selecting only the resemblances; and the omissions can be as significant and informative as the insertions. The outstanding example is Melchizedek as bodying forth the timeless Christ. “Without father, without mother” - that is, with no recorded father or mother - “without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like” - by the omissions from his record - “unto the Son of God” (Heb. 7: 3). So for Israel’s whole forty years in the Wilderness all record of the rushing River disappears. By well or spring, in oasis or borderland, they must have drunk*;- for the indwelling Spirit, the indraught, never leaves us; but on the active, not passive, action of the water, on the rush of the river through the wilderness - i.e., the pouring of miracle through the Christian Ages - there is a total silence. So Paul makes the very curious statement that “the rock followed them” (1 Cor. 10: 4), as though to emphasize that it is our Lord, rather than the Spirit - though in both type and antitype it must have been, and must be, both - who has been the miraculous Shepherder of His People through the desert centuries. The water must have been designed to follow Israel:** moreover, while, at the end, they and it had obviously parted, there is no proof that it had ceased, or that God had dried it up or withdrawn it: Israel could have kept it by following its course, or by digging channels and erecting aqueducts. Nevertheless, as a matter of fact, when it is seen again it has to be recreated.

 

*“The imperfect, [...] were drinking was intended to denote their continuous drinking all through the entire march in the wilderness: in the previous sentence we have the aorist [...], signifying the simple fact of drinking” (Lange).

 

** “The region of Sinai is very elevated, and not only are the mountain ridges immensely higher than the south of Palestine, but the ground slopes from the base to a considerable distance all round, so that the water would naturally flow with the Israelites” (P. Fairbairn, D.D.). So also Moses says: -“I cast the dust thereof into the brook that descended out of the mount” (Dent. 9: 21).

 

 

RESTORATION OF MIRACLE

 

 

Now there bursts upon us, who also are standing on the threshold of our Promised Land, the extraordinary conclusion of the Type, which closes in Israel’s fortieth year in the Wilderness, within sight of Canaan. As at Horeb - ‘Horeb’ means ‘a dry land,’ an apt description of the Church and the world to-day - once again there falls on Israel the mighty thirst: once more the Rock appears, and an entirely new outrush of Wilderness water: once again Moses names the place ‘Meribah thus clinching together the two Pentecosts, as one in source, character, and prophecy-fulfilment, although separated in date. But there is no repetition of Calvary. “The Lord spake unto Moses saying, Take the rod” - now, not Moses’ rod of judgment, with which he smote the Nile, but Aaron’s rod of High Priestly intercession, “the rod from before the Lord” - “and SPEAK YE unto [not smite] the rock, that it give forth its water” (Num. 20: 8). Prayer, not Calvary, is to reopen the rock, and to restore the lost Gifts. “ASK ye of the Lord rain in the time of the latter rain; and He shall give them showers of rain” (Zech. 10: 1). So it is a different word for ‘rock’, a stronger word, a ‘cliff’ - the risen and exalted Christ; and, actually, it was another rock: nevertheless it is still the Rock, in antitype the same Rock: and now the Rock, exquisitely appropriately, is spoken of as containing the Water - “its water” - gifts from the ascended Christ (Eph. 4.). It is a second Pentecost without a second Calvary.*

 

* It is difficult to foresee just what Moses’ violent disobedience (anti-typically) portends. Can it mean that apostate Church authorities, by “crucifying to themselves the Son of God afresh” (Heb. 6: 5), and laying the whole murmuring, mutinous, despairing Church under anathema, compel God’s resort again to miracle to save His entire people from perishing?

 

 

POWERS OF THE AGE TO COME

 

 

Moreover, the last outpour is to be fuller, more wonderful; for only of the second output of the Rock is it said,- “and the water came forth abundantly” (Num. 20: 11)- in cataracts. Thus in another type - the rush of the living waters from Ezekiel’s Temple - we find a confirming revelation: as literal a river as that in the Wilderness, it is probably equally typical, and equally a type of the outflow of the Spirit in miracle. For all miraculous powers are “the powers of THE AGE TO COME” (Heb. 6: 5); powers, that is, which, though displayed in the Apostolic Church - to which the Apostle definitely refers them - nevertheless in their abundance, riches, and reach are still so future, so characteristic of the Age to Come, so inhering in a future. Pentecost rather than a past, that they are said to belong to the Kingdom that lies ahead. “Behold, waters issued out from under the threshold; and it was a river that I could not pass through” (Ezek. 47: 1, 5): waters not from off the Altar, as from a Christ smitten afresh, but from under the Altar, i.e., on the ground of Calvary still: breaking out of the foundations, it equally sprang out of ruptured rock. It may be that the curious and miraculous swelling of the river is a record of the age-long rising of the tide, continuously swelling, yet unfed by any tributary of earth; ankle-deep, knee-deep breast-deep, shoulder-deep: that is, a trickle in rare, pre-Flood prophets; a brook in the body of prophets under the Law; a rushing river in the miracle-gifted assemblies of the Apostles; and an unfordable flood in the Millennial Age.

 

 

THE DATE

 

 

It is of intense and legitimate interest to learn exactly when (if God has revealed it) the second outrush occurs. All seems to converge on one approximate date. The first outrush was apart from the people, in the presence of the Elders alone: at the second, all the People of God are gathered together - an explicit forecast of the muster in the heavens. The Kingdom was on the threshold; the Presence-cloud, containing the Shekinah, had come, the Shekinah always accompanying the local descent and presence of Jehovah (Num. 20: 6) - that is, the Parousia has begun; and the rod evoking the flood was Aaron’s sole rod of all the rods of Israel’s leaders that budded - the almond-rod of the First Resurrection. And the saints are being grouped in their grades: Miriam, type of excluded dead saints, is just dead (Num. 20: 1)*; Moses and Aaron, type of excluded living saints, hear their sentence; and Caleb and Joshua, within a few months of the outrush, enter in.** So Joel approximately dates it:- “In the last days, saith God, I will (1) pour forth my Spirit, and I will (2) show wonders, before the day of the Lord come” (Acts 2: 17, 20).*** Presumably somewhere between His departure in the first rapture (2 Thess. 2: 1), and the outburst of the Great Tribulation, the Spirit returns as the Spirit of God “sent forth into all the earth” (Rev. 5: 6) Sections of Israel repenting (Peter says) are to be the signal for “seasons” - years of repeated showers - “of refreshing FROM THE PAROUSIA of the Lord” (Acts 3: 19), as He tarries in the heavens. Thus as the black thunder-cloud of Calvary brought down the first drenching Pentecost, so in close proximity to the fierce tempest of the Day of the Lord, but preceding it, falls the later flood.

 

* “It can scarcely be doubted that her death in the unlovely wilderness was a punishment like the death of her brothers” (Dean Spence).

 

**Two enter from the living (Caleb and Joshua), and two from the dead (Jacob and Joseph: Gen. 47: 30, Ex. 13: 19), making up the world-number of the Kingdom on earth.

 

*** Both in the Old Testament and the New, the last outpouring is quoted together with the last judgments, and as inextricably mixed up with them. Our Montanist, Irvingite and Tongues brethren have all overlooked this fatal overthrow of their claims - claims themselves mutually destructive to have experienced the ‘latter rain.’ As Habakkuk (3: 2) says:- “Revive thy work in the midst of the years; in wrath remember mercy

 

 

-------

 

 

HEALING NATURE

 

 

The healing that can lie in a closer knowledge of God’s exquisite world awoke the pulse of joy in Sir Roland Ross, on the eve of his great discovery that the mosquito is a transmitter of malaria.

 

 

This day relenting God

Has placed within my hand

A wonderous thing: and God

Be praised. At His command,

Seeking His secret deeds

With tears and toiling breath,

I find thy cunning seeds

O million-murdering!

I know this little thing

A myriad men will save.

O Death where is thy sting,

Thy victory, O grave?

 

 

-------

 

 

THE GREAT PYRAMID

 

 

The instability, the credulity of many Christians t0-day, a credulity based on a painful ignorance of the Word of God, is one of the very saddest elements in the modern situation. To take but one example, an age which shows an ever-relaxing grip on the veracity of Holy Scripture beholds a section of Church accepting the numerical inerrancy and exact foreknowledge of a great heathen mausoleum. At a British-Israelite mass meeting in the Albert Hall it was announced - regardless of a jagged coast black with wrecks - that the measurements of the Great Pyramid prove that the - [soon coming select Rapture (see Rev. 3: 10, 11, R.V.) and] - Tribulation falls between May 28th, 1928 and September 15th 1936. The fixing of an Advent date is a funeral of that hope. McCheyne once said to a group of friends, gathered for evening converse;- “Do you think Christ will come back to-night?” One after another they replied:- “I think not.” McCheyne then said very solemnly:- “Be ye also ready, for in such an hour as ye THINK NOT the Son of Man cometh

 

 

-------

 

 

Was Jesus poor? Ah me! Ah me!

How could such query ever be

Concerning one who staked his claim

With no boundary but his Father’s name?

He, with one wide statement, made

Inventory of all he had:

Of wealth, no limit; lack, no sign;

All that the Father hath is mine.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

31

 

THE REBUILDING OF THE TEMPLE *

 

[* After reading this writing see:-

 

(1) “THE TEMPLES THAT JERUSALEM FORGOT” by Dr. Ernest L Martin. “Dr. ERNEST MARTIN has taught history for 12 years at a college in England, been the Chairman of the Department of Theology at another in California, has supervised over 450 college students at the most significant archaeological excavation ever conducted in Jerusalem for two months each year for a period of five years (and his archaeological educational program was featured in the Education section of Time magazine for September 3, 1973. He has written major research books that are advertised internationally in archaeological and theological periodicals, and over 600 Planetariums around the world show his astronomical and historical research at their December showings. He has written several hundred articles on biblical and historical subjects and is also listed in the current editions of ‘Who’s Who in religion’ and “Education,” and “Who’s Who in Biblical Studies and Archaeology

 

(2) “TEMPLE” by Robert Cornuke. “ROBERT CORNUKE is president of the Bible Archaeology Search and Exploration (BASE) Institute. He has participated in over 60 expeditions searching for lost locations described in the Bible and has been featured on major television networks, including ABC, FOX, CNN, National Geographic and the History Channel. Bob is a former FBI-trained police investigator and SWAT team member. The author of ten books, he received his PhD from Louisiana Baptist University]

 

 

-------

 

 

 

A shaft sunk 60 feet to 125 feet in the ground, says Dr. Edersheim, through the accumulated debris of ages, reached ancient Jerusalem. Some years ago the sudden disappearance of a dog through the rubbish led to the discovery of vast underground grottoes or quarries. The stone in these quarries is exceedingly white, and it is also soft, but hardens after exposure. It was found that vast quantities had been quarried ages ago, enough, some engineers assert, to build the present Jerusalem two or three times over; and the deep grooves which are let in on every side of the block to be quarried, as wedges were then inserted at the back for dislodging the stone from its bed-rock, remain to-day exactly as the workmen left them three thousand years ago. For these are called - as they are believed to be - Solomon’s Quarries. Moreover, beneath the surface on which rises the present Dome of the Rock on Mount Moriah, vast foundation stones - some between 20 feet and 30 feet in length, and encased in a block of unbroken masonry said to be without a parallel in the world - reveal, in the belief of the Palestine Exploration investigators, the actual platform of rock on which stood the Temple, of Solomon. One of the chief of these stones has been examined by sinking a shaft down to the foundations of the Temple wall. Embedded in the rock in the angle formed by the eastern and southern walls, the stone was discovered at a depth of 79 feet from the surface. It was found to be 3 feet 8 inches high, and 14 feet long, and was probably the first stone placed in position by King Solomon’s workmen. This is the most wonderful stone in the world, for it is the Great Corner Stone, the oft-mentioned type of the Saviour.

 

 

Prophecy is not silent on the reconstruction of the Temple unbelieving Israel. That reconstruction is assumed rather than stated; but the assumptions are explicit and unmistakable. “The people of the prince that shall come Daniel says, in describing that final descent Antichrist on the Holy Land to which our Lord refers the passage (Matt. 24: 15) “shall destroy the city and the sanctuary” - which must thus have been rebuilt; “and he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation obviously a Levitical ritual restored in unbelief, “to cease” (Dan. 9: 26). So Paul also: “The man of sin [shall] be revealed, the son of perdition, he that sitteth in the temple of God, setting himself forth as God: whom the Lord Jesus shall bring to nought by the manifestation of his coming” (2 Thess. 2: 4). The desolations of Antichrist (Dan 8: 11) in a rebuilt and repeopled Palestine are foretold also by the Psalmist. “Remember Mount Zion, wherein thou hast dwelt. Lift up thy feet unto the perpetual ruins, all the evil that the enemy hath done in the sanctuary. They have set thy sanctuary on fire; they have burned up all the synagogues of God in the land” (Ps. 74: 2).

 

 

A rough estimate of the cost - [presumably when first published on August 15th. 1927] - of the original construction has been drawn up in collaboration with Dr. Gaster, Mr. Schor and other experts. King Solomon set 30,000 men to cut timber; 80,000 men to quarry stone; 70,000 wood and stone carriers; and over all, 3,300 foremen. The timber cutters worked in shifts; ten thousand worked in Lebanon for a month (1 Kings 5: 14), and then went home for two months. The 150,000 other workmen, as Canaanites, were slaves; assuming however that their cost of maintenance roughly equalled ordinary wages, and that they also worked in shifts, the wages bill (assuming an eight hours’ day at 8d. an hour) for the seven years of the construction of the Temple would be as follows: the timber cutters, £5,824,000; the stone-hewers, £46,592,000; the stone-carriers, £40,768,000; and the foremen (at £2 a week), £2,401,003: making a grand total of £95,585,000. Further enormous sums must be added for purchase of the site* (2 Sam. 24: 24; 1 Chron. 21: 25), the cost of the building materials (1 Chron. 22: 14), the internal decoration (2 Chron. 3: 6), the sacred vessels (Ezra. 8: 27), and - assuming that all the Temple was overlaid (1 Kings 6: 22) in proportion to the 600 talents reserved for the Oracle (2 Chron. 3: 8), thus requiring 2,700 talents in addition - not less than £14,782,500 must be added for the overlaying with gold. Against all this must be reckoned the colossal sums which David amassed (1 Chron. 22: 14): 100,000 talents of gold, or (assuming the talent to equal £5,475) £547,500,000; 1,000,000 talents of silver or £342,000,000 and out of the privy purse, £18,819,000, (1 Chron. 29: 4).** Probably the modern Temple will be constructed on a more modest scale, and at less gigantic cost: but be it also remembered (apart from the labour-saving appliances of modern construction) that the entire wages bill a single American citizen could pay four times over***; that Freemasonry, deeply interested in the rebuilding of the Temple, is probably the wealthiest corporation in the world; and that the Jewish princes of finance rank second to none in Europe+: nor is it impossible that the three great Syrian Faiths - a corrupt Christianity, Islam, and Judaism - may unite in re-erecting a House which enshrines the root-origins of them all.

 

* Imitation of Ezekiel’s Temple, built outside the City (Ezek. 45: 3), may prompt the Zionists to select an extra-mural site for their Sanctuary, thus solving the problem of the Mosque of Omar.

 

** These figures must be received with caution, owing to the uncertainty of the exact value of the talent; but the most conservative estimates run into hundreds of millions sterling. The utterly unparalleled magnificence of Solomon’s structure, dwarfing any palace or temple ever made, is shown by the next costliest building in the world - St. Peter’s, in Rome, which took several centuries to build, and cost £9,000,000.

 

*** Mr. Henry Ford’s wealth reaches £260,000,000. David gave approximately £10,000,000; but a single modern Jew - Julius Rosenwald, of Chicago - owns £22,000,000.

 

+ A recent inquiry at one of the great Banks elicited the conjecture that the Rothschilds perhaps control £1,000,000,000, and that the aggregate of Jewish controlled wealth may equal £50,000,000.

 

 

That the Temple will be rebuilt is certain. “I am willing,” says Mr. Lucien Wolf in the Spectator (June 26th  1920), “to admit - indeed, do so quite shamelessly - that we Jews do pray for the rebuilding of the Temple.” Even Christians are found willing to co-operate. “If the Temple could be rebuilt,” writes a correspondent to the Times, “under the auspices of all Christian Churches to represent Christianity in its widest development, the Eastern as well as the Western Church, the Non-conformist as well as the Anglican, surely this would be something worth attempting.” And the Jewish Catechism assumes it. Here is its teaching on the Sacrifices:-  “Why are the sacrificial laws not now observed? Because we no longer have a temple, the only place in which we are permitted to sacrifice. Since these laws are not binding on us now, are we to consider them as abolished? Certainly not; they are not binding now, because our circumstances prevent their being observed, but, whenever we return to our own land and again constitute a State, they will have full force

 

 

Doubtless new Temple furniture will replace the spoils of Titus.* Dr. Russell Forbes says:- “I have traced the seven-branched lamp down to 614 through ancient authors, and lose it in PersiaJosephus describes the spoils carried in the procession in A.D. 71 (Wars of the Jews, 7, 5, 5). Vespasian deposited them in the Temple of Peace (Ib. 7, 5, 7). In 455 Genseric carried them off to Carthage (Procopius, B. V. 1, 5, Evagrius 4, 17). In 535 Belisarius recovered them and took them to Constantinople (Procopius, BAT. 2, 6, Evagrius 4, 21). Justinian sent them to the Christian Church in Jerusalem (Procopius, B.V. 2, 6, Evagrius 4, 17). In 614 Khosroes, King of Persia, took them to Persia (Annals of Eutychianus, Antiochus of Seba, seventh century; Baronius, E.A. 16, 23). The Mishna declares that the Ark is hidden in a cave under the Temple. So Dr. Edersheim ventures on a fascinating but highly improbable suggestion. “It may be,” he says, “that some at least of the spoils which Titus took are hidden somewhere in the vaults beneath the site of the Temple, after having successively gone to Rome, to Carthage, to Byzantium, to Ravenna, and thence to Jerusalem

 

* Of Herod’s Temple Tacitus says:- “Pompey entered the Temple, by his right as conqueror, and found no divine image in it, but only an empty abode

 

 

The Divine prevention by miraculous means of a premature Temple - if tradition is truthful - confirms its re-erection in its own season. For fire-balls broke from the foundations and drove off the builders when Julian the Apostate attempted its restoration. “Sudden explosions,” says the Jewish historian, Professor Graetz, “occurred repeatedly and disheartened the workmen* Meanwhile, a leader of Liberal Jews in England, Rabbi Israel Mattuck, says:- “There may be truth in the report that a small section of ritual butchers in Hebron are secretly practising the sacrifice of rams and bullocks on Mount Moriah, on which the Mosque of Omar now stands, but they are, I should imagine, a decided minority.” And that Mount Moriah might in a moment be freed from the incubus of the False Prophet the recent earthquake has proved: “The Dome of the Rock,” says a cable to the Times (July 14th 1927), “was badly shaken, and the many repairs of recent years made useless

 

* History of the Jews, vol. II. p. 608.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

32

 

JOHN THE IMMERSER NOT ELIJAH

 

 

A Note on the Doctrine of the Transmigration of Souls.*

 

 

By G. H. LANG

 

 

* The fruit of a conversation with a wealthy Copt in Egypt. “Theosophy,” Mr Lang writes, “is everywhere.” - Ed. [D.M.P.]

 

 

 

Advocates of the pagan, Oriental teaching that after death men pass through various reincarnations, desiring to persuade Christians to accept this doctrine naturally seek to find support for it in Holy Scripture, and they rely mainly on the assertion that the New Testament says that John was Elijah. This only shows how hard pressed they are to give even due semblance of Bible support to the doctrine.

 

 

That Eastern philosophies and manners had infected Israel is certain. The process was already well advanced seven centuries B.C. “My people says God by Isaiah, “are filled (i.e., with theories and customs) from the east” (Isa. 2: 6). This was increased by the Assyrian, Babylonian and Persian conquests of Israel and the sojourn of many Jews in those lands.

 

 

This sufficiently explains why Jews of Christ’s time thought He might be one of the older prophets (Matt. 16: 14), or the semi-pagan Herod that He was John the Baptist (Matt. 14: 2), and why others conceived that a certain man might have been born blind because of sin of his own (John 9: 1). But this last notion Christ’s answer set aside. Thus, we may in no wise regard the then current Jewish conceptions as being necessarily divine truth. They must be shown to be grounded in divine statements in Old Testament scripture. The passages regarding John and Elijah are:-

 

 

1. Luke 1: 16, 17, the angel Gabriel’s words before John’s birth: “Many of the children of Israel shall be born unto the Lord their God. And he shall go before his face in the spirit and power of Elijah

 

 

2. Matt. 11: 13, 14, 15. Christ’s words concerning John: “All the prophets and the law prophesied until John, and if ye willing to receive it, this is Elijah that is to come. He that hath ears to hear let him hear i.e., the meaning of this is not on the surface, a warning not to form a hasty opinion of the meaning.

 

 

3. Matt. 17: 10-13. As they came down from the transfiguration “the disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elijah must first come? And he answered and said, Elijah indeed cometh, and shall restore all things; but I say unto you that an Elijah came just now, and they knew him not, but did unto him whatsoever they would. ... Then understood the disciples that he spake unto them of John the Baptist

 

 

As to the first passage, the angel did not say that John should be Elijah, though that could have been stated quite simply and distinctly. He said only that John should fulfil his appointed ministry in Elijah-like spirit and power. [See Greek clause ...]  See R.V. and Nestle texts. If one said that a general acted in the spirit and energy of Napoleon he would not be saddled with meaning that the general was Napoleon. The phrase would implicitly distinguish the two.

 

 

In the second scripture our Lord made the fulfilment in John of Malachi’s prophecy concerning Elijah, as the one sent before the face of Messiah, to depend upon the willingness of Israel to receive it so. But if in fact John had been personally Elijah his being so could not have been dependent upon the willingness of men to receive a statement of Christ about him or upon any other condition. If he was Elijah he was Elijah, whether people would accept it or not. Christ’s expression shows that John was not Elijah actually.

 

 

The remaining passage is equally decisive.

 

 

1. The Lord said the scribes were correct and that “Elijah indeed cometh, and shall restore all things So that (a) Elijah was not yet then come, but was yet to come; therefore, John was not he: and (b) Elijah was to do a work which John had not accomplished, “to restore all things so that John’s ministry was not Elijah’s ministry, even though it was of the same order and partook of the same spirit and power.

 

 

2. Because of this last feature Christ could add: “I say unto you an Elijah came just now, and they knew him not, but did unto him whatsoever they would. ... Then understood the disciples that he spake unto them of John the BaptistThus the first statement that Elijah indeed is to come, did not make the disciples think of John. It was the added remark that did this. It was (I think) Mr. Pember, who pointed out that, on account of the Greek not using an indefinite article, the words should read in this clause as above, “an Elijah came just now[See Greek clause ... ]

 

 

Thus far the actual statements of Scripture. Each of them not only does not support the notion that John was Elijah reincarnate, each is definitely against it. But these further considerations are equally and fatally opposed thereto.

 

 

1. John had been already murdered, and his corpse minus its head had been buried. Elijah, at the time of Christ’s last statement had just been seen by the disciples in propria persona in a glorified condition. If John was Elijah then Elijah had been formerly taken to heaven (2 Kings 2.), reincarnated in John, decapitated, and directly after glorified. In this case the heresy would be true, for him at least, that “resurrection is past already” (2 Tim. 2: 17, 18). The three last assertions will defy all proof from Scripture.

 

 

2. 2 Kings ch. 2. shows that Elijah was taken to heaven alive, which allows without difficulty of his appearing in glory on the mount. But as he never had died his case is not in point as proof of the reincarnating of dead men. It is singular that advocates of this unfounded theory seem to overlook this fatal defect in their argument. But drowning men will clutch at a straw, and theosophy subtly perverts or boldly denies Scripture as may suit its theories.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

33

 

THE TEMPLE OF EZEKIEL + 3

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

So impenetrable have the closing chapters of Ezekiel been supposed to be - Gregory the Great, starting on their exposition, said, “We pursue a midnight journey” - that the Rabbis, who forbid (or did forbid) any Jew under thirty to read them, say:- “When Elijah comes, he will expound them.” But the context, to the prophetical student, makes at least the general outline transparently clear. For Ezekiel opens his book with an apostate Israel in exile, a polluted and abandoned Temple, and a Holy City in ruins: then, as the Advent draws on, Israel’s vast valley of dry bones heave in resurrection (Ezek. 37.), and hordes from Rosh pour down on the Holy Land (38., 39.), to be extinguished in Armageddon: now, finally, the horizon fills - in nine detailed and amazing chapters - with the superb Metropolis of the Millennial earth. So Ezekiel opens with all lost: he closes with all restored, in earth’s new, splendid dawn. From the stark ruin of Israel, from their very suburbs of hell, Isaiah foresees world-peace, Daniel a world-empire, and Ezekiel a world-city, and in the midst a ‘House of Prayer for all Nations’.

 

 

THE TEMPLE

 

 

The new Citv, covering 144 square miles,* with a huge belt of isolating suburbs, a garden-city, will be pitched on the north of the vast valley split by the earthquake (Zech. 14: 4); and the new Temple, not built on the site of the old, and now outside the Holy City, is of enormous proportions and most complicated structure.** Pitched on the plateau of “a very high mountain” (Ezek. 11: 2) which was thrown up by the Advent earthquake, by which the whole Land is “lifted up” (Zech. 14: 10), the Temple is pyramidal- an ascending climax, and the Holy of Holies is the apex of the pyramid. For the base of the mountain is a square, a mile each way; the Outer Court, higher up the mountain, 1,000 feet on each face of it; the Inner Court, still higher, 600 feet square near the summit, the Court of the Priests, 200 feet by 200 and on the final platform, 100 feet by 100, is the Holiest in the centre of which - and thus of the whole earth - are the Altar and the Throne, for the solitary royal priesthood after the Order of Melchisedek.

 

* I take these figures, unchecked, from The Student’s Commentary. The area of Constantinople (Times, July 2, 1927) extends over 170 square miles.

 

** Voltaire declared that he could not remember in all antiquity a national temple so small as Solomon’s. If it be reeds and not cubits (Ezek. 42: 17). Ezekiel’s Temple is 36 times larger than Solomon’s; and the Holy City above as far surpasses the dimensions of Ezekiel’s as Ezekiel’s surpasses that of ancient Jerusalem.

 

 

THE CONSTRUCTION

 

 

Thus the Temple is now built on a scale ample enough to make it at last what God always intended it to be - the House of Prayer for all Nations. The gates, or rather gateways, are constructed as huge arcades 100 feet long and 50 feet broad, each with arched roof and latticed windows; with 6 lodges, 3 on either side; and 10 internal chambers to each gate, opening on the Great Square within, are reached by successive flights of stairways in these many mansions (apparently 48 chambers to each gateway) in the Father’s earthly House. That neither builder nor materials nor cost is named throughout - all of the first importance in the construction of Solomon’s Temple - and above all, that whereas sacrifices are constantly ordered to be offered, a command to build occurs nowhere, seems to prove that God is not only the Architect, but the Builder; and the planting of “a palm tree between cherub and cherub” (41: 18) - unknown in the Tabernacle and the Temple - indicates that the victorious day has arrived at last when “the latter glory of this house shall be greater than” even Solomon’s (Hag. 2: 9).

 

 

THE SACRIFICES

 

 

The restoration of the Sacrifices, which has been a stumbling block to thousands, nevertheless is a certainty, and seems based on two facts:- (1) for ceremonial cleanliness of the flesh, for men in the flesh;* and (2) for a memorial backward - exactly such as the Lord’s Supper is - of Calvary. Like the Mosaic sacrifices (and unlike Transubstantiation) these sacrifices are no more identical with Calvary than the Levitical were, but memorial exactly as the Mosaic were prophetic. Effective sacrifice began and ended with Calvary. So in Leviticus the Burnt Offering came first, then the Sin Offering; here, it is first the Sin Offering, then the Burnt Offering: for Calvary’s Lamb is in the centre - the offerings of old looking forward, the offerings to come looking backward. In Leviticus the year closed with a pointing forward to an atonement yet to be accomplished: here the year begins with a memorial (45: 18) of an atonement perfectly accomplished. So, instead of the twofold offerings of Leviticus at Passover and Tabernacles, there will, at these two Feasts, be the sevenfold offering of an atonement perfectly revealed. Under Leviticus there was a morning and evening Sacrifice: here, a morning only; for there will be no moral night in Israel again, and her sun shall no more go down. There is no High Priest, for the Supreme Priest is present in person; and there is no Ark. “In those days, saith the Lord, they shall say no more, The Ark of the covenant of the Lord; neither shall it come to mind: neither shall it be made any more. At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord” (Jer. 3: 16). The Law now is not in the Ark, but in the bosom. So the Veil, the Shewbread, the Lampstand - all memorials of the absence - vanish in the Presence. So also the Feast of Weeks totally disappears, for all harvest - rapture - is over; but the Feast of Tabernacles - the great Millennial symbol - is compulsory, not on Israel only, but on “all the families of the earth “ (Zech. 14: 16).**

 

* Even decades after Calvary “the ashes of a heifer sanctify [present tense] unto the cleanness of the flesh” - that is, ceremonially (Heb. 9: 13). “We ought not to close our eyes to the revelation of this future day for the earth, when God sanctions priest and people, sacrifice and altar, for Israel. If we cannot adjust the differences, we are bound at least to submit to the Scriptures, which are unanswerably plain in their import, both as to ourselves now, and as to Israel by-and-by” (W. Kelly).

 

** Wine is not forbidden to the priests, except when on Temple duty, nor marriage, except to a widow; and both monk’s tonsure and fakir’s locks are forbidden (Ez. 44: 20-22).

 

 

THE LAND

 

 

All Palestine undergoes an equally revolutionary change. The Twelve Tribes are redistributed in a unique arrangement, in equal strips across the land: neither according to order of birth, nor the order in Jacob’s blessing, nor the old order of Joshua’s allotment; and for the first time the Levites have an earthly inheritance. The Land has over it a Prince only, for the Theocracy is restored; and Israel’s supreme glory, forfeited when they asked for a king, is given back - a Monarch who is Jehovah. One strong note of the Millennium - reward according to works - degrades the Levites, who of old deserted their tasks and abandoned their orthodoxy (44: 8, 10, 12), and confines them, throughout the Millennial Age, to the Court of the Priests (44: 11) outside the Presence;           whereas the sons of Zadok, for splendid fidelity in the midst of the corruption of all God’s people (44: 15), serve close to the King, and offer the sacrifices of God. Only the circumcised both in heart and flesh can enter the Temple’s Inner Courts,* but the Outer Courts will be the House of universal Prayer; and the Gentile, forbidden inheritance in the Holy Land under the Levitical Law, will be granted it in the Millennial Land. No feature of the new Palestine will be more wonderful than the River, burst by earthquake out of the foundations of the Temple (Zech. 14: 5, 8), and in less than a mile grown to an unfordable flood, obliterating the deadness of the Dead Sea. Its source is the Throne, its channel the Altar; half pours to the Mediterranean, half to the Dead Sea (Zech. 14: 8) and it changes the desert portion of Palestine to an Eden.**

 

* The Most Holy, into which Ezekiel himself is not invited, is sacrosanct: even the Prince can approach no further than the Inner Gate of the Sanctuary.

 

** Thus Jerusalem’s great defect - for Babylon has the Euphrates, Nineveh theTigris, Rome the Tiber, London the Thames, New York the Hudson - is remedied miraculously by God, and its constant difficulty - an adequate water-supply - removed.

 

 

THE GLORY

 

 

But the crowning glory still is wanting, without which all this amazing preparation were unconvincing and incomplete. No sooner had the Inner Sanctuary been marked off than the Wonder that had abandoned the foul premises of the polluted Temple, leaving it Ichabod, returns like lightning. The Shekinah comes back along the exact route by which it went; but whereas its going was the most reluctant departure in the Bible, its return is the swiftest - “the Lord shall suddenly come to His Temple” (Mal. 3: 1).* Solomon’s Temple was resplendent with gold and gems: these, in Ezekiel’s, are completely absent**: not gold, but glory; not gems, but God. Of old, the Glory so blazed in Solomon’s Temple that the Priests were driven forth by its blinding light (2 Chron. 5: 14) but now, as “the glory came from the way of the east, the EARTH shined with His glory” (Ezek. 43: 2): apparently, it not only blazes en route, but suffuses a soft and permanent glow over vast areas. So at last is fulfilled Isaiah’s word: - “The Lord of hosts shall reign in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, and before His ancients” - presumably the Twelve Apostles, each on his tribal throne - “gloriously” (Isa. 24: 23); “and the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and all nations shall flow unto it: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem” (Isa. 2: 2).

 

* The Shekinah never entered Ezra’s Temple, and this is therefore necessarily a Temple yet to come.

 

** Only ‘wood’ and ‘hewn stone’ (40: 42; 41: 16, 22) are named. We are indebted to Mr. G. H. Ramsay for a reproduction of Dr. Delitsch’s Map of the land in the coming Age.

 

 

-------

 

 

HEROISM FOR GOD

 

 

An English college was once visited by a minister seeking volunteers for a mission-field in India; and he assured the students that the work was easy, the homes comfortable, the society pleasant: not a man moved. A little later a mission worker came, seeking for volunteers for the Congo, in Africa, to fill vacancies created by death; and he closed bluntly by saying:- “It will most likely mean, death to you, tooSix men immediately rose.

 

 

-------

 

 

WAITING AND WATCHING

 

 

To look for His coming is to prepare for Him. If I were asked to visit you to-morrow evening, I am sure you would make some preparation for my call - even for one so common-place as myself. You would prepare, because you would welcome me. If you expected the King to call how excited you would be! What preparation good housewives make for a royal visitor! When we expect our Lord to come, we shall be concerned to have everything ready for Him. I sometimes see the great gates open in front of the larger houses in the suburbs: and it means that they are expecting company. Keep the great gates of your souls always open, expecting your Lord to come. It is idle to talk about looking for His coming if we never set our house in order and never put ourselves in readiness for His reception. Looking for Him means that you stand in a waiting attitude as a servant who expects his master to be at the door presently. If you look for His appearing you will be found in an attitude of one who waits and watches, that when his Lord cometh he may meet Him with joy. Christ is coming, I must not sin: Christ is coming, I must not be rooted to the world.

 

 

As to watching, this is rarer than waiting. The fact is, even the better sort of believers who wait for His coming, as all the ten virgins did, nevertheless do not watch. Even the best sort of the waiters slumber and sleep. You are waiting but you are sleeping! This is a mournful business. A man who is asleep cannot be said to look; and yet it is “unto them that look for Him” that the Lord comes with salvation. We must be wide-awake to look. We ought to go up to the watch-tower every morning, and look toward the sun-rising to see whether He is coming. Surely our last act at night should be to look out for His star, and say:- “Is He coming?” It ought to be a daily disappointment when our Lord does not come; instead of being, as I fear it is, a kind of foregone conclusion that He will not come just yet.

 

 

                                                                                       - C. H. SPURGEON

 

 

-------

 

 

Finish thy work, the time is short,

The sun is in the west;

The night is coming down, till then

Think not of rest.

 

 

Yes, finish all thy work - then rest;

Till then, till then, rest never:

The rest prepared for thee by GOD

Is rest for ever.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

34

 

WAKING AND SLEEPING + 1

 

 

By ADELPHUS

 

 

 

Much interest attaches to the fact, that two words for sleep are used in First Thessalonians. One is found in chapter four, and occurs there three times. The other is employed only in chapter five, and occurs there four times. Thus the three and the four together make up the sacred seven. In cases where the three begin and the four follow, we pass from what is God’s, to what which belongs to man. The three occurrences in chapter four are -

 

 

 

1. “I would not have you ignorant concerning the fallen asleep”: verse 13.

 

 

2. “Those put to sleep by Jesus will God bring”: verse 14.

 

 

3. “We who are alive shall not get the start of those fallen asleep”: verse 15.

 

 

The occurrences of the Second Word in chapter five are as follow -

 

 

1. “So then let us not lie down to sleep, as do the rest” verse 6.

 

 

2, 3. “They that lie down to sleep, lie down to sleep by night”: verse 7.

 

 

4. “Whether we keep awake, or lie down to sleep” verse 10.

 

 

This Second Word is a compound; the verb by itself signifying to sleep: the preposition signifying ‘down and calling attention to the voluntary change of posture, the lying down of those wishing, for repose.

 

 

The choice of these two words is beautifully adapted to the different aspects of the subject.

 

 

1. The Greek word occurring in chapter four presents to us the being lulled to sleep by a superior, without consultation whether the patient desires it or not; even as a mother or a nurse puts a child to sleep for its benefit, before it is able to decide for itself. Hence we have “those put to sleep by Jesus They are passive in the hands of Christ, as the infant in the mother’s arms. And as the Saviour puts them to sleep, so He will awaken them at the fitting time. “Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep; but I am going that I may awaken him out of sleep”: John 11.

 

 

2. The Greek word in chapter five signifies sleep as it is a matter of choice and of preparation, for it, by those older, and able to decide for themselves. Hence it is connected, in the four occurrences there, with exhortation. “Let us not sleep as the rest; but let us keep awake, and keep sober.” “For they that lie down to sleep, lie down to sleep by night Here the sleep is evil, because of the mischief following on it, and it is a matter of responsibility on the part of those that give way to it. “Awake, thou that art lying asleep: and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light”: Eph. 5.

 

 

But there is one apparent exception, on which I will say a few words, as it is really a beautiful confirmation of the distinction here stated.

 

 

The Saviour, in the Garden of Gethsemane, takes apart Peter, James, and John, and says: “Stay here, and keep awake with Me”: Matt. 26: 38; Mark 14: 32. On His returning to the disciples, He finds them lying down asleep. Unto Peter He says: “Simon, liest thou asleep? Couldst thou not keep awake a single hour

 

 

He comes to them again, and again finds them lying asleep. He leaves them.

 

 

On coming the third time, He says: “Are you lying asleep for the rest of the time, and taking repose? It is enough; the hour is come, behold the Son of man is being betrayed into the hands of the sinful

 

 

These points are all in favour of the view given; but there is a passage in Luke 22: 45, 46, which contains both the first (or passive word) for sleep, and also the second (or the word of choice and activity). “He came to the disciples, and found them sleeping from sorrow, and saith unto them: ‘Why lie ye asleep? stand up and pray, in order that ye enter not into temptation.’”

 

 

So this example gives us sleep as a matter of choice on the disciples’ part, and the call to throw it off as evil. But it is not obscurely hinted, that there was a superior at work upon their passivity, and for their harm.

 

 

1. “He findeth them lying asleep; for their eyes had been made heavy; neither knew they what answer to make Him” Mark 14: 40.

 

 

2. “He found them (the first and passive word) sleeping from sorrow” (something not of their own will). And lastly He says to the armed foes: “This is your hour, and the power of darkness”: Luke 22: 53. “The spirit indeed is willing; but the flesh is weak

 

 

Both classes, the sleepers and the wakeful are referred to Jesus.

 

 

1. “Those put to sleep by Jesus.” “The dead in Christ shall rise Those only who are in Him and put to sleep by Him, find the sleep of death a benefit. They are alive in Him, and death cannot break the bond.

 

 

2. But of the living saints we read also: “We who are alive and remain to the Presence of the Lord Then both parties are “caught up together into air to meet the Lord

 

 

-------

 

 

MASONRY AND THE CHURCHES

 

 

The Free Presbyterian Magazine (Inverness) kindly sends us the information - of which we were unaware - that not only has the Salvation Army separated itself from Masonry, but also the Free Presbyterian Church, the United Presbyterian Church, the Reformed Presbyterian Church, the Wesleyan Methodists, the Free Methodists, the Christian Reformed (Dutch) Church, German Baptist Brethren, and some of the Lutheran Synods. The Society of Friends also falls into line with these. General Bramwell Booth says:- “No language of mine could be too strong in condemning any officer’s affiliation with any Society which shuts Him [Jesus Christ] outside its temples, and which in its religious ceremonies gives neither Him nor His name any place

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

35

 

THE MASONIC CRAFT

AND THE GOSPEL + 3

 

 

By Rev. C. PENNEY HUNT, B.A.

 

 

 

Three aspects of the Gospel are vital for every Christian (1) Christ’s Objective Sacrifice on the Cross; (2) Salvation by faith only; and (3) The Sacraments, interpreted spiritually and apart from all notions of pagan magic.

 

 

One of the most prolific masonic writers, Mr. W. A. Waite. from whose pen has issued volume after volume for a generation, manifests an amazing lust for these things. He is a great archaeological student and a great admirer of the Kabbalists. There are 1,400, degrees known to Masonry of various ages and lands. 1,200 have entirely ceased to be worked, but, Waite has taken the remaining 200 and has minutely studied the rest. If he is not an authority, who is? In his Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry he tells us that the masonic ritual is as sacramental as anything practised in the Churches. Like other writers quoted - Vishnu, Osiris and Christ are re-incarnations of the same deity. In his latest work, published 1925, under the title Emblematic Masonry, p. 286, he writes: “We are the officiating priests, alone ordained truly, by a succession that is more than Apostolic” Note the words: masons are “alone truly ordained.” They are a “succession more than Apostolic.” Again we read, p. 284, “The pupil of the great master Eckehart so grew in the grades of the Divine Love that in the hypothesis concerning her attainment it was possible and valid for her to make the amazing affirmation ‘I am God.’” Again, p. 286, “But we are the Sacred Host that is poured into the chalice, and the wine ... is that of our own being, on the understanding that it is God within us.”

 

 

But of course masons who are Church Leaders would repudiate this sort of thing? Let us see.

 

 

The masons of Dundee, to raise money, have issued a volume, the proceeds from which are to be devoted to the erection of a new Temple at Dundee. It is entitled The Treasury of Masonic Thought, and may be had of G. M. Martin, 5, West Park Gardens, Dundee. It consists of over 50 articles, written by as many leaders of Freemasonry. The Chapter on the great Pyramid of Egypt, written by A. Churchward, M.D., M.R.C.P., F.G.S., P.M., P2., 30 [degree] informs us that at the top of the Great Pyramid is the true Lord’s Table, with the true message and gnosis for poor humans for their salvation. He writes: “This message was perverted by the Christians, who had lost the gnosis.” He adds, “These mysteries have been carried down through the ages of time ... by the fraternity now known by the name of Freemasons, in a purer form than any other religious cult.” Then follows this amazing utterance: “It is a Christian belief that life and immortality were brought to light, and death, the last enemy, was destroyed by a personal Jesus only 1923 years ago, whereas the same revelation had been accredited to Horus, the anointed, at least 300,000 years. before. ... The Egyptians, who were the authors of the Mysteries ... did not pervert the meaning by an ignorant literalization of mythical matters, and had no fall to encounter in the Christian sense. Consequently they had no need of a Redeemer from the effects of that which never occurred. They did not rejoice over the death of their Suffering Saviour, because his agony and shame and bloody sweat were falsely supposed to rescue them from the consequences of broken laws on the contrary, they taught that everyone created his own ‘Karma’ here, and that the past deeds made the future fate. Horus did such and such things for the glory of his father, but not to save the souls of men from having to do them. there was no vicarious salvation or imputed righteousness; Horus was the justifier of the righteous, not of the wicked. He did not come to save sinners from the trouble to save themselves. He was an exemplar, a model of divine worship, but his followers must conform to his example. ... Except ye do these things yourself, there is no passage, no opening of the gate to the land of everlasting life.” (pp. 219f/) Apart from this caricature of the Atonement, what sort of example was that of Horus, compared with Christ’s?

 

 

Does Masonry repudiate this book? Nay, a new masonic lodge is being erected out of the profits. And a recent reference in the masonic press tells us the book is being read the world over. Do masonic Ministers repudiate it? Why, the preface to this volume is written by the Rev. W. Paxton, F.R.S., at the time a Congregational Minister of Dundee. Previously he was President of the Bradford Free Church Council. He is now [July, 1927] pastor of Great George Street Congregational Church, Liverpool.

 

 

But the classical passage illustrating the “Christian. Interpretation” of Masonry, is Wilnshurst’s description of the mystic experiences of the candidate passing through the final stages of these degrees, as set forth in 50 pages (146-182 of the Masonic Initiation. The writer represents him lying in his “coffin” in a condition of Hypnosis (and compares his experiences with the hallucinations effected by inhaling nitrous oxide gas). The candidate seems to be led by a guide into the Celestial Lodge above. Here celestial workmen are busy designing plans for use below - social systems, national constitutions and plans for the use of modern Masonry. They have given up, states the writer, designing ecclesiastical constitutions - God has no further use for the Church. Thus all things on earth are “in accordance with the pattern shown in the Mount  His guide then takes him into still higher regions and coming to the Pillars of the Royal Arch, leaves him to proceed into the darkness beyond and alone. This is the Day of Atonement. Each must tread the winepress alone. The candidate hears his guide in the rear, praying “Father, into Thy hands I commend his spirit.” The candidate finds himself divested of all clothing save his masonic apron. Blood and sweat drip from his brow. He cries for help to the other “sons of the widow” (i.e. Hiram Abiff and the rest). The remainder I give in the author’s own words. “I felt myself lifted up above the earth ... my frame into vertical erectness and rigidity, extending my arms horizontally, making taut and tense under its strain every fibre of my being. In mid air, my head held towards heights I could not reach, my feet pointing to the earth they no longer touched, my arms wide-flung traversely into void space, I hung suspended upon that invisible impalpable Life-Tree; myself a cross; myself the crucified upon the cross. ... As I hung, my thorny crown stabbed its spikes, more deeply, more insistently into my brow. ... It was the zero-point of negative consciousness ... where nothing is and God is not. Eloi, Eloi; Lama Sabachthami! ... I revived ... I rejoined my former brother and guide ... at the pillars ... my presence dazzled him with the light it now radiated . ... Then ... as we embraced he exclaimed: ‘The Master is Risen!’ and to him I replied - ‘He is risen indeed.’” Ward and Waite draw similar pictures. So does Powell. Here is one sentence. “Before the soul rises again in its glory, there must be Gethsemane and Calvary. There is a loneliness, a desolation, and an isolation of bitterest intensity ere the soul ... can be itself, unaided by anything or any being outside itself, alone aloof, a King in its own right.” - (The Magic of Masonry, p. 105)

 

 

So the “Christian Interpretation” of Masonry is this - just as Christ atoned for his own sins and for nobody else’s, so must each individual make atonement for himself, unaided by any other individual.

 

 

-------

 

 

FREE-MASONRY GNOSTIC

 

 

The Masonic mixture of Faiths - “we masons says Dr. Fort Newton, late minister of the City Temple, “pursue the Universal Religion” - can only end in a Gnosticism which was exactly such a compound, both being definite apostasy-creators. “It is well for a man,” says Mr. W. L. Wilmshurst, President of the Installed Masters Association of Huddersfield and a lecturer throughout the Lodges of England, “to be born in a Church, but terrible for him to die in one; for in religion there must be growth. A young man is to be censured who fails to attend the Church of his nation; the elderly man is equally to be censured if he does attend:- he ought to have outgrown what that Church offers and to have attained a higher order of religious life. The Churches may be left to continue to discharge their proper ministry, whilst those who feel the need of richer fare than the Churches provide may find it in the ancient Gnosis to which Freemasonry serves as a portal of entrance

 

 

-------

 

 

THE TEMPLE

 

 

Some years ago the Freemasons of Boston applied for the incorporation of a company for the Temple’s reconstruction by the Freemasons of the world. The passion which will yet re-animate the Jew is already born in Mr. J. W. Kelchner, the architect of the Temple model for the Philadelphia Exposition. “With rapt face and eyes shining he told the writer [New York Times Sept. 6th 1925] how he had dreamed his vision of the Temple as a boy of fourteen. ‘I could see it in all its glory, rising terrace on terrace, with its gold, silver and brass flashing in the sunlight. I saw its court, its holy places, and its great altar. So compelling was the vision that I could hardly wake when my father’s hand shook me. That was the beginning of my quest for the Temple. By the time the sun set that evening I had made up my mind. I decided that I would give my life to securing a complete restoration of the Temple. From that time on I had only one object in life.’ Through school and college the young student carried his dream. All his studies were guided by the thought that some day he would re-erect the Temple. He studied Hebrew, Latin, Greek, and several modern languages so that he might read in, the original every mention of the Temple of Solomon. German he already knew. He conferred with scholars interested in Biblical history. He went to the geographic sources, visiting Palestine and the Far East and retraced the trails of the ancient Israelites. Thirty years after he had started out on his quest for the true Temple Kelchner began his plans for the restoration

 

 

-------

 

 

THE SPIRITUAL TEMPLE

 

 

The two Temples, the spiritual and the literal, overlapped by 40 years, the 40 years of the final probation of the Jew: for the final pro       bation of the Gentile (Rom 11: 22) they may overlap again. How soon we may be in the land where money is little worth, and only goodness counts! “I have so much to doJohn Calvin wrote, “that many a night is spent without an offering of sleep being brought to Nature”; and so he laid the foundations of early disease and premature death. When his friends expostulated, he replied:- “Would you wish that the Lord should find me idle when He comes

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

36

 

MOSES AND CHRIST + 1

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

The taproot of all Modernism, its bottom-most source beneath all surface reasons, is not intellectual but moral: it is a sensitive spirit blenching and wilting, not so much before the miracles of the Old Testament as before the Old Covenant’s outbursts of fierce destruction. The nineteenth century, in the lands where the Higher Criticism was born, had been for generations steeped and drenched, beyond any other century, in Gospel teaching; and the Sermon on the Mount had been universally presented as the quintessence of the Divine revelation as a rule of conduct - therefore, to minds which had absorbed this atmosphere, and which assumed that nothing else could be divine, psalms of fearful imprecation, the command to annihilate whole nations, a judgment that wiped out an entire world - these were moral stumbling-blocks raising the gravest issues. Thus Criticism  - taking it on its most favourable side - felt about it, in an agony of need, for some explanation of the documents which would lift the responsibility from God of acts and decrees utterly irreconcilable (as the Critics believed) with New Testament grace and love. The ‘shock’ that creates Modernism is not so much the wonder of Jonah or the emergence of the floating axe, as a Jericho exterminated to the last man or the children torn limb from limb by two she-bears from the woods.

 

 

JUSTICE

 

 

Now Augustine’s saying is wonderfully true:- “ Distinguish the dispensations, and all difficulties vanish.” The whole of the Old Testament is based on law; and the fundamental principle of law is righteousness; and the chosen instrument of righteousness, everywhere and always, is justice. It is put with Divine intensity - “JUSTICE, JUSTICE shalt thou follow” (Deut. 16: 20); and the exact justice which is the principle of all law is expressed in words so important that they are repeated by Jehovah three times:- “Thine eye shall not pity; life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot” (Deut. 19: 21). All the law courts of the world, all the legal codes of all nations, are based on this exact equipoise of crime and punishment: and Mosaic law, thus based on one of the attributes of God, burns with the white heat of absolute righteousness. So for two thousand years mankind was put on this footing, as a huge dispensational experiment of God; in order that men might learn, not in inspired writings alone, but in the hard, convincing school of bitter fact, that righteousness for the sinner is an unscalable Matterhorn, and justice the thing most to be dreaded in the universe.*

 

* So justice also ruled private conduct. For men, put on the footing justice before God, were therefore permitted to exact justice from their fellow-men ; and as God enforced righteousness from them at the peril of judgment, so they might enforce righteousness from others at the peril of the sword. The State (which is but the world organized for purpose of government) abides (Rom. 13: 1-7) under this principle.

 

 

REPEALS

 

 

Now with Christ the new era dawned in which we moderns have been so long immersed, and of which we have drunk so deeply, as to be in the greatest peril of losing the razor-edged sense of righteousness whereby alone justice is even understood. For the Lord Jesus appears, and, once again on a mount, quotes freely from Sinai, only as freely to repeal. Again and again He says, “Ye have heard that it was said to them of old time to the ancients, the fathers; and every quotation He makes is from Jehovah’s own utterance in the Law; and at least twice, if not three times, He quotes bodily from the Decalogue which Jehovah had written with His own finger: in every case substituting another law. Sometimes it is a heightened law - as between adultery and the mere gaze of impurity; sometimes it is a different law - as between oaths and affirmations; sometimes it is a contrary law - as between hate of an enemy and love: always, it is a harder law, and another law. For Grace (unlike some of its modern exponents) is not Antinomian: we are taken from under law to Moses, but we are put “under law to Christ” (1 Cor. 9: 21). And our Lord manifestly did it of set purpose. As the Decalogue, the heart of the old Law, was delivered to the people of God on Sinai, yet (so to speak) overheard by the nations; so the Sermon on the Mount, the summary of the new law, was given to the disciples, yet within earshot of the multitude; and as the Gentile, if a proselyte, at once passed under the Law of Sinai, so the soul once born again passes at once “under law to Christ

 

 

MOSES AND CHRIST

 

 

Now this repealing attitude of our Lord is profoundly more startling, and more fundamental to our conception of God’s entire revelation, than we have been accustomed to think. Comment has divided off sharply into two antagonistic interpretations; while in a third interpretation lies the solution the Modernist has missed. The Gnostics, keenly aware of the Lord’s repealing legislation, made Him a great and powerful antagonist of Moses, and said that Jesus came to deliver us from the savage and bloodthirsty Jehovah: so that Marcion, deliberately altering the Lord’s words, makes Him say:- “Think ye I came to fulfil the law or the prophets? I came to destroy, not to fulfil.” The other and dominant school of interpretation asserts that our Lord, purging the Law of human glosses and traditions, reaffirms and rebinds it on the consciences of His people in its original purity and power. “The Commandments,” says the Pulpit Commentary, “are as binding now upon the Christian conscience as when they were first delivered amid the thunders of Sinai.” Christ and Moses antagonistic, Christ and Moses identical:- these are the two rival theories, one of which is the assassination of Christianity, and the other the destruction of grace.*

 

* So also “the Manicheans took exception to Matt. 5: 17; either doubting its genuineness, or declaring that if genuine it was unintelligible. On the other side, heathens, Jews, and deists found in it a proof that the Author of Christianity held merely Jewish opinions, and that it was Paul who first proclaimed the peculiar doctrines of the Christian religion” (Tholuck).

 

 

FALSE THEORIES

 

 

Now both these theories not only are wholly irreconcilable with the facts, but create the difficulty which is the source of Modernism. The Lord’s own critical words are decisive against both. Against the Gnostic view His words are final:- “Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I came not to destroy, but to FULFIL” (Matt. 5: 17). The Lord Jesus fulfilled the Law by giving it a perfect obedience, and what is fulfilled, passes: He also fuller-filled it by demanding a goodness in His followers exceeding, and so discarding, the Legal. But in thus fulfilling He established the absolute authority and final meaning of the Law and the Prophets. Christ woke the butterfly slumbering in the chrysalis of the Law, for the Law was Death encasing Life - the Messiah. And against the dominant interpretation such a blank contradiction as:- “It was said, An eye for an eye, but I say, Resist not” (Matt. 5: 38) - is immediately destructive. A law is not enforced by being repealed.* It is straining casuistry, past the breaking-point to say that the command to lay up no treasure is merely the inner meaning of Israel’s full basket and storehouse on obedience; or that the prohibition of all swearing is only what the Law meant by ‘performing unto Jehovah’ (and therefore most sacredly) our oaths. The fact is, the Gnostic cleavage shatters the Gospel’s foundations; and the current confusion confounds Law and Gospel: the goal of an antagonism between Christ and Moses is Gnosticism; and the goal of an identification of Christ and Moses is Rome.

 

* “Our Lord does not speak against the abuse of the Law by tradition but every instance here given is, either from the Law itself, or such traditional teaching as was in accordance with it” (Alford).

 

 

THE DISPENSATIONS

 

 

So the unfolding heart of the problem lies in the bosom of dispensational truth, that terra incognita of the Church of all ages, and the only solution of a perfect and harmonious Book. With the breakdown of salvation through our own righteousness came the total collapse of Law: justice has nothing for a criminal but a sword: that side of the character of God, and that side only, which enthrones righteousness can be dominant before and after salvation. Therefore, when the Saviour comes to save, He meets the full blast of justice in His own person, but, in consequence, He sweeps the board clear of Legal justice; and therefore selects those points in the Law for specific and avowed repeal which express justice, not mercy; and He creates a new code, diviner because it embodies a higher attribute of God - namely, Love, expressing itself in unceasing, unresisting grace.* It is not that justice is repealed, or dishonoured, or abolished, but suspended. Law is as everlasting as the righteousness of God, of which it is simply the expression: but a Gospel of amnesty for every sinner is slipt in between two eternities of Law **; and a code of mercy, tenderness, non-resistance, love - the only code possible to pardoned felons, themselves still far from sinless - is the exquisite necklace Christ has hung about the neck of the Church.

 

* Thus it needs no proof that the Church and the State are mutually exclusive spheres. The statesman in the House of Commons was perfectly correct who said recently:- “If we attempt to govern the country by the principles of the Sermon on the Mount, we shall go by way of confusion to anarchy.” The Church, not the world, is the body “under law to Christ” (1 Cor. 9: 21), for which alone He legislates in the Sermon. A foremost Hindu thinker express it admirably:- “The teaching in that Sermon was not intended for the man in the street; to him it is impracticable, impossible; it was intended for the twice-born, the holy man, the man who has literally given up the world, and who is living not after the flesh but after the spirit

 

** For, outside Hell, law in eternity will be law in a sinless state, and so merely the normal habit of a perfect life; exactly as God's actions are all regulated by law - the eternal laws of goodness and truth.

 

 

-------

 

 

MERCY

 

 

The quality of mercy is not strain’d;

It droppeth, as the gentle rain from heaven

Upon the place beneath: it is twice bless’d;

It blesseth him that gives, and him that takes:

’Tis mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes

The throned monarch better than his crown;

His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,

The attribute to awe and majesty,

Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;

But mercy is above this sceptred sway,

It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,

It is an attribute to God Himself.

 

 

                                                                                                          - SHAKESPEARE.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

37

 

THE CASE AGAINST THE

SECOND ADVENT +1

 

 

 

How strongly Second Advent truth is telling is proved by the elaborate attempts now being made to refute it, the latest being advanced (Christian World, Feb. 10th and 17th  1927) by Dr. Charles E. Jefferson, begins by giving away a good deal more than he can afford. After dilating on the watchword of the Apostolic Church, embedded untranslated in every version - Maranatha - he says:-

 

 

We do not say to one another “Maranatha We seldom think of His coming. That will account in large measure for the difference in spirit between the first century Church and our own. Their belief in the early coming of Christ gave an intensity to their life which ours does not possess. We are intense about certain things but not about our religion. There was an other-worldliness in the Church of the Apostles which has vanished. The early Christians kept their thoughts upon the other world, the world into whi.ch Christ had vanished and from which He was soon to emerge again. We do not think much about the other world. The present world is amazingly attractive and it absorbs all our strength and time. It is a difficult world to manage and we have no time for any other. The Apostolic Church was a radiant Church. That Church was jubilant and ours is not. The face of that Church shone. Our face does not shine. One of the reasons why the jubilant tone has vanished is because we have lost the expectancy which the Apostles possessed.

 

 

Now this encomium - a perfectly true one - is exceedingly dangerous to Dr. Jefferson’s case. “Do men gather grapes of thorns Does it not go far towards overthrowing the very foundations of morality to paint in glowing colours the heavenly mind and unearthly conduct which sprang, and spring, out of what is later described as ‘a deadly superstition’, It is a fundamental law of the universe that like alone produces like. If the life radiant to which (as Dr. Jefferson says) the modern Church without the Advent is a stranger, is the fruit of a ‘travesty’ and a ‘caricature’ of the Gospel (again the Doctor’s words), morality is at an end, and truth has committed suicide.

 

 

But why does the Doctor admit so much? For one very simple reason. He thinks he has a deadly torpedo which he can launch at any moment into the flank of the Advent, sinking it hopelessly. Here it is:-

 

 

Let us see what Paul believed. We have his belief recorded in 1 Thess. 4: 16-18: “For the Lord Himself shall descend from heaven, with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God; and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we that are alive, that are left, shall together with them be caught up in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air, and so shall we ever be with the Lord That is very clear and very positive. The Lord is coming out of the sky with a shout. An archangel is going to speak. The trumpet of God is going to blow. All the Christians then alive, and Paul will be among the number, will be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. That was Paul’s joyful belief. Of that he had no doubt. That is the doctrine which he taught his converts. But Paul was mistaken, so were all the Apostles. Every one of them was mistaken. Their mistake is recorded in our New Testament. That mistake cannot be got rid of. It was a huge mistake, and it forms a part of the New Testament for ever.

 

 

Alas, the ‘huge mistake’ is Dr. Jefferson’s! It is always an error to attack a citadel with such contempt as not first to have mastered its ground plan. Cannon emptied at out-works which do not exist waste their shot. A not very recondite study of the Scripture documents reveals that the attitude and not the date was the one constant factor inculcated, combining unwavering readiness with the possibility of indefinite postponement. We to-day use exactly the language of the Apostle, with an identical meaning:- “we that are alive, that remain, shall be caught up”: whether we shall be alive, and remain, is one of the secrets of God. Dr. Jefferson confounds expectation with prediction.      The Apostle John carefully guards (John 21: 23) against any dating of the Advent, even within the last Apostle’s lifetime, while equally carefully leaving open its possibility, hope, or even expectation. An identical attitude runs through the entire substructure of all Advent prophecies. Paul’s ‘huge mistake’ simply does not exist; and with it collapses the solitary argument, the lonely foundation, from which Dr. Jefferson, with a curiously uninformed assurance, jettisons the Second Coming as ‘a deadly superstition.’ Nor is the Doctor’s knowledge of Advent literature any more accurate than his knowledge of Advent prophecies.

 

 

They say He is coming soon. They used to name the date. They missed it so many times they dare not do it any more. Only a fanatic of unusual stature ventures, any longer, to specify the day on which the Lord will bring the world to an end. They now use ambiguous adverbs. They declare He is coming “soon

 

 

Had Dr. Jefferson any knowledge at all of Advent literature - he seems acquainted only with the date-fixing vaticinations of non-Christian sects such as Russellism, or Mormonism, or the Order of the Star in the East - he would know that we could range through the thirty volumes of the Quarterly Journal of Prophecy, or the entire output of the Rainbow - probably the most remarkable periodical on prophecy ever issued - or the pages of any foremost exponent of the Coming, and cross-examine hundreds of thousands of prophetic students of every grade of gift and grace, and not only find no date, but the strongest possible enforcements of our Lord’s prohibition of all date-affixing to an event the very soul of which is its inviolable secrecy.

 

 

Nor is Dr. Jefferson’s one practical criticism a ‘mistake’ less ‘huge.’ He imagines because Christ’s Gospel finds so obstinate a refusal as to shift the centre of gravity for world-reform across the grave, rendering all present political and social effort a constant Sisyphus miscarriage, that the Advent attitude is, therefore, folded hands and a slumbering heart.

 

 

A reading of the Bible which cuts the nerve of action is certainly a deadly superstition which all open-eyed lovers of the truth must resist and overcome.

 

 

As a matter of fact, the mass of work accomplished in the world, and for the world, by watchers for the Lord during the world’s latest century is out of all proportion to their rank or number. Missionaries like Hudson Taylor, philanthropists like Lord Shaftsbury, evangelists like Moody, preachers like Spurgeon, expositors like Govett, authors like Pember, scholars like Tregelles, founders of institutions for Christian rescue like George Muller: - all these giants in their several spheres, Whose labours were colossal, not only could say, but most have said, that so far from ‘cutting the nerve of action,’ it was the nerve. We have space for but a single witness. Mr. Moody, beyond challenge the greatest evangelist of the modern age, and from his earliest years an exhaustive worker, says: - “I have felt like working three times as hard since I came to understand that my Lord is coming again

 

 

Dr. Jefferson’s own view of the Coming is a coming so ineffectual that it never ceases, and never arrives.

 

 

The proper expression is the “continuous” coming of Christ. He has already come many times. He is coming many times. In the present hour He will come and keep on coming.

 

 

It seems a light matter to critics of this kind that such a view contradicts point-blank the Son of God, who says:- “they shall see the Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory” (Matt. 24: 30). If the Apostles erred, the Lord erred much more deeply, for His assertions of His bodily return are the most drastic and constant in the whole range of Scripture.

 

 

It is deeply pathetic that the very ‘faith’ in the future which the Church often so loyally, so bravely, exercises is itself a tragic ‘unbelief’ - in the Scriptures - doomed to bitter disenchantment. Israel stressed the crown and forgot the cross - the Church stresses the cross and forgets the crown; and critics of the Advent, coming perilously near to filling the role of the mockers foretold (2 Pet. 3: 3), may well be cautious lest they duplicate Israel’s blunder, who, “because they knew not the voice of the prophets, fulfilled them by condemning Him” (Acts. 13: 27).*

 

* The only Christian date-affixers (so far as we know) are found among advocates of the ‘year-day’ theory, nor would even they (we imagine) attempt to forecast the exact day of rapture, or the hour of our Lord’s arrival on earth.

 

 

-------

 

 

RECANTING CRITICISM

 

 

The real worthlessness of much Biblical Criticism has just been astonishingly proved by no less a critic than Professor von Harnack. “Fifty-seven years ago,” he says, “when I began my theological studies, it was generally admitted that the only reliable critics were those who did not regard more than four of the epistles of Paul as authentic. Since then things have changed. Besides 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians and Romans, 1 Thessalonians, Colossians, Philippians and Philemon are accepted as authentic. The collection of Epistles is so ancient that to regard any one as the work of a forger would raise serious objections. It is more than likely that the primitive collection of the ten epistles contains only authentic writings.” What then becomes of the learned disquisitions on these very Epistles, tabulating ‘assured results’ which we were told that we must ‘face,’ which shook the faith and disembowelled the preaching of countless ministries? Criticism can thus write its own epitaph, but - infinitely more tragic - it first writes the epitaph on pulpit tombstones and a myriad of vacant pews.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

38

 

THE BEATIFIC VISION + 1

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

The circumstances of our eternal state, the other wonders of other worlds which God is preparing for them that love Him, often absorb our thoughts; but there is another destiny ahead of God’s children incalculably profounder and more entrancing. Important as are the ‘many mansions the services to which He may appoint us, the honours with which He may crown us, incomparably more satisfying, inexpressibly more wonderful, is a deeper revelation of God. “Beloved, now are we children of God, and it is not yet made manifest what we shall be” ; but “we know that, if he shall be manifested, we shall be LIKE HIM, for we shall see him even as he is” (1 John 3: 2). No man is ever converted but there is the germ of a perfect image of Christ. What I am must always be infinitely more vital than where I am, and what I am than what I have. While it is conceivable - though it can never happen - that our honours might be stripped from us, our mansions forfeited, our service ended, our characters are our own for ever; and the butterfly already slumbers in the chrysalis. We are far more than royalties travelling incognito.

 

 

THE PLAN

 

 

Now this profound plan of God lies embedded in a past eternity of which we have no knowledge. “Whom he foreknew, he also FOREORDAINED to be conformed to the image of his Son?” (Rom. 8: 29). All that we are as reborn children of God has its background, its draft-plans, in a past eternity; and we do not read that God foreordained us to pardon, or to ‘Paradise’, but to exact approximation to the character of Christ. Man was created in the image of God (Gen. 1: 26), but the image was lost (Gen. 5: 3): now the ceaseless creative urge, which can never be ultimately baffled, working on plans in which the lapse of the first image is allowed for, and pans which are ‘ordinations’ - that is, Divine fiats - is recreating the image. God willed it before our wills even existed, and therefore the ultimate image, already created in the eternal will, is as certain as God Himself.

 

 

THE TRANSFORMATION

 

 

The next passage is peculiarly valuable for showing that the transformation is not physical only in resurrection, but a transfiguration of character that has already begun in the regenerate. “We all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a glass” - or, reflecting as in a mirror - “the glory of the Lord are [being] transformed into the same image from glory to glory as from the Lord the Spirit” (2 Cor. 3: 18). The veil, that concealed Christ, has, for as, been removed, and the ‘new man’ in us, a creation of like substance with Him, and so mouldable and capable of complete likeness, is being renewed after the image of him that created him (Col. 3: 10). If we look at a person, the pupil of our eye reflects his complete image: so, as we habitually contemplate the Lord, the image at which we look - like a photographic negative exposed to an object in the light - reproduces itself in us: and as conversion itself is a fundamental, structural change toward ultimate ‘glory so, as the process continues under the fingers of the indwelling [Holy] Spirit, the change - not of thought, or even conduct, only, but of being - mounts “from glory to glory By continually beholding, we are continually transfiguring. “It is not great talents God blesses,” says McCheyne, “so much as great likeness to Christ.” Thus future glory is not so much something added from without, as goodness emerging from within: it is the butterfly springing from the chrysalis: it is “manifestation of sons of God*

 

* This passage also settles the critical point of the date. Just when the change takes place is partly determined by the thoroughness of the prior work of the Spirit; even as in a back-slider, deepening in a backsliding life, the process actually and manifestly retrogrades. The vision will be effective in all, but not simultaneously in all. Moreover, as it is “by the Lord the Spirit,” the final moment must be His decision alone, and does not depend solely on the physical vision: we read of no change in Moses or Elijah, though they watched the transfiguring Christ; nor in Mary when she beheld the risen Lord in the Garden, or the Apostles witnessing the Ascension. The vision did not change John in Patmos any more than it will change all believers at the Judgment Seat of which the Patmos vision was a forecast. Ripeness and the Divine fiat  - [i.e. ‘an official authority for action’ {Latin, ‘let it be done’ (Heinemann English Dictionary, p. 398)] - date the transformation of each.

 

 

THE VISION

 

 

But a far fuller, and therefore a far more potent, vision awaits us in resurrection bodies; for if the vision of the Lord in the mirror only - the Scriptures - so changes us, what must the reality? “We shall be like him, for” - because: it is philologically certain that the proposition introduced by [see Greek word ...] contains the real and essential cause and ground of that which it follows (Alford) - “we shall see him even as He is” - that is, no longer as weary by Sychar’s well, or convulsed in agony on Calvary. All through it is a transforming vision. The first vision is - “Behold the Lamb of God”; and the susceptible negative created by this second birth, touched and retouched by the transfiguring [Holy] Spirit during life, has the process sharply completed by the direct vision of the Lord. Exceptional servants of God have betrayed gleams of the coming Glory. After Moses had been forty days, and no more, in the presence of God his countenance was so transfigured that people were afraid to approach him (Ex. 34: 29); and Stephen’s face awed his murderers, “Looking up steadfastly into heaven, he saw Jesus; and all saw his face as it had been the face of an angel” (Acts 7: 55). For the rest of us the transcript is written in faint, though indelible, ink, which will steal out, one day, in letters of fire.

 

 

THE LIKENESS

 

 

The Apostle is keenly conscious of the necessarily limited grasp of our imagination. “We know not” - we are in the ark - “what we shall be, but we shall be like him The word [see Greek ...] - as Dr. Lange says - means ‘resembling,’ ‘similar not’ equal to [the Greek word ...]: it is only of Christ Paul says that He is equal to God (Phil. 2: 6). Christ is the Image of God (Heb. 1: 3) in a sense in which we cannot even be an image of Christ. All that separates the creature from the Creator - omnipotence, omniscience, omnipresence - is a gulf we can never bridge; but the human Christ, in moral and physical perfection, is the model to which God is working: we shall be replicas of Christ; and it includes the physical - “who shall fashion anew the body of our humiliation, that it may be conformed to the body of his glory” (Phil. 3: 21). It is one thing to know that we shall be sinless; it is another and altogether more wonderful thing to know that we shall be like Christ. Earth would be heaven if all men were duplicates of Christ. “We know not what” - it is not defined closer than a resemblance. Our Lord sums up the perfect Man, of all types; so each of us will resemble Him in the type in which we were created. No profounder criticism of the missionary body has been offered than the question of a Japanese woman:- ‘Missionary, when was it that Christians stopped being like Jesus

 

 

THE GOAL

 

 

So in eternity we reach the goal to which God is steadily working, a goal of indescribable wonder. It is the felt discord with our own ideal which produces all the misery that is in the Christian life: the hour hastens when our nature, through and through and to its innermost core, will be transformed into exact accord with a heavenly environment. For “they shall SEE His face: and His name shall be on their foreheads” (Rev. 22: 4):- ‘hall-marked,’ for God’s name can be stamped on that only which is in God’s nature. The all-devastating vision, so dread as to cause instant death - for “man shall not see Me and live” (Ex. 33: 20), before Whose face earth and heaven dissolve - is, reversed, the same enormous power, unimaginably potent, which changes what it smites into the image of itself. We shall have the mind of Christ, the outlook of Christ, the tastes of Christ, the unselfishness of Christ, the affections of Christ, the angers of Christ, the compassions of Christ, the purity of Christ, the habits of Christ, the devotion of Christ, the heavenliness of Christ. And the change is final. The presence of God made the skin of Moses to shine; the vision of God will make the substance of the soul glorious: but the presence-glory decayed and died; while the glory from the vision, saturating all the extent of our being in all its depth, passes into the imperishable substance of the soul. The whole world must one day acknowledge in us the very beauty which they now acclaim in Christ.

 

 

SECOND BIRTH

 

 

So we see the fearful necessity of the initial act. “In the day that God created man, in the image of God made he him”; but “Adam begat a son in his own likeness, after his image” (Gen. 5: 1, 3): the image of God was lost. Only God can recreate it, and He does so in a second birth - that Christ may be “the firstborn among many brothers fellow-images in the likeness of God. “Now are we” - [who are regenerate] - “children of God”: unless born again - [at the time of our resurrection or translation (Luke 20: 35; Rev. 3: 10; 2 Tim. 2: 18)] - in the nature of God, it is obviously impossible - [during this life and evil age] - to grow into the image of God. And the proof is in the likeness. As an image plants itself upon a mirror so that the image now reaches the eye, not from the image only, but from the reflection in the mirror, so the godly man is the ungodly man’s mirror of Christ. Renan [the apostate] says:- “Francis, of Assisi has always been one of my strongest reasons for believing that Jesus was very nearly such as the synoptic Gospels describe Him.” When Voltaire visited England, he said of Fletcher of Madeley:- “This man is the true likeness and character of Jesus Christ.” A missionary entered the hut of an aged chief. He was ninety years old, and blinded by the years. As Dr. Phillip entered, the old man burst into tears, and thanked God for his coming. He scraped up the dust into his hand, and said:- “In a little time I must mingle with that dust; but in this flesh I shall see God. I am blind; I shall not [now] see the light of day; but by the light of faith, I see Jesus standing at the right hand of God, ready to receive my soul

 

 

-------

 

 

DUTY

 

 

Stern Lawgiver! yet thou dost wear

The Godhead’s most benignant grace;

Nor know we any thing so fair

As is the smile upon thy face:

Flowers laugh before thee on their beds,

And fragrance in thy footing treads;

Thou dost preserve the stars from wrong

And the most ancient heavens, through thee, are fresh and strong.

 

 

                                                                                                  - WORDSWORTH.

 

 

-------

 

 

TWO GATES

 

 

A minister went hurrying out of the church to catch the train. Upon arrival at the gate he found he had just three minutes. A man who had heard him speak rushed up and said, “I am very anxious about my soul.” The minister replied, “I have only two minutes to catch my train. It is the last one to-night. I request you to read Isaiah 53: 6. Go in at the first all, and come out at the last all.” The man went home, thinking over that strange instruction. He got out his Bible and read: “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all The anxious sinner, after reading the passage said: “I am included in that first ‘all’”; after reflection he suddenly recalled that he was also included in the last “all.” He immediately fell on his knees and accepted pardon and cleansing.*

 

[* NOTE: For further instruction, for “the ELECT”, of “a salvation ready to be revealed in the LAST time ... though now ye see him {Jesus Christ} not, yet believing, ye rejoice greatly with joy unspeakable and full of glory: receiving the END of your faith, even the salvation of your SOULS. Concerning which” {future} “salvation the prophets sought and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: searching what time or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did point unto, when it” {the Holy Spirit} “testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glories that should follow them”: (1 Pet. 1: 1, 5b, 8-10, R.V.)]

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

39

 

MILLENNARIANISM AND ERROR

 

 

By HORATIUS BONAR, D.D.

 

 

 

Let us inquire into the connection said to subsist between millennarianism and false doctrine. Can it be proved by acts? Or is it the mere inference of those who, having a very bad opinion of the system, think that it must be, and ought to be, connected with all forms of error?

 

 

I state then, and am willing to prove, that those who have not only endangered, but subverted the whole fabric of Christianity, have not been millennarians, but their opponents. The gnosticism of the early ages was openly as well as essentially anti-millennarian. It was allegorical and anti-literal, a patch-work of Christianity and pagan philosophy. It not only allegorized into a spiritual shadow the first resurrection, but all resurrection whatsoever, condemning as carnal all who believed in any resurrection, just as our opposers condemn us for believing in the first resurrection. And who upheld the truth against these anti-millennarian and allegorizing gnostics? Irenaeus and Justin Martyr, two noted millennarians. The connection between anti-millennarianism and heresy, in the first ages, can be clearly established by fact. The antagonism between millennarianism and heresy can be as clearly proved. The heretic gnostics were the only opposers of millennarianism in these days; the thoroughly orthodox fathers were its unanimous supporters. Gnosticism and anti-chiliasm were friends; Gnosticism and chiliasm* were open enemies. Yet our system is said to be all along linked with heresy.

 

* The doctrine of the Personal Reign of Christ on earth during the millennium.

 

 

The carnal follies of Cerinthus are sometimes exhibited as specimens of millennarianism. But Cerinthianism and chiliasm were thoroughly and openly opposed to each other. The millennarian fathers were the strongest condemners and confuters of Cerinthus and his abominations. There was antagonism, not alliance between them; and it would be as correct to identify Calvinism and Socinianism, because Priestley happened to be a predestinarian, as to identify chiliasm and Cerinthianism, because Cerinthus spoke of the saints reigning the earth.

 

 

In the second century the state of matters was the same millennarianism and orthodoxy still went hand in hand. Whencesoever the danger to the fabric of Christianity might come, it did not come from millermarians. “Chiliasm constituted (says a German writer), in the second century, so decidedly an article of faith, that justin held it up as a criterion of perfect orthodoxy

 

 

Then Origen came into the field, - no friend to chiliasm, and as little to orthodoxy. He turned the whole Bible into a riddle; he denied the doctrine of eternal punishments. He seems to have been thoroughly unsound even upon fundamental points. In his case, surely heresy and anti-chiliasm were the allies. The chiliasts in these days, instead of “endangering the whole fabric of Christianity,” were its steadfast supporters against anti-chiliastic heretics, who were introducing “not only a new dispensation, but a new Christianity*

 

* Dionysins of Alexandria, who is considered to have given the finishing stroke to chiliasm in the Eastern Church, was a denier of the Godhead of the Holy Spirit.

 

 

Then came Jerome, one of the keenest and most unswerving opponents that millennarianism ever had; one who never loses an opportunity of assailing it. Was Jerome sound in the faith? Alas! he seems to have no idea of free justification at all. All with him is works; - superstition and self-righteousness darken the pages both of his Epistles and his Commentaries. Perhaps Popery owes more to Jerome than to any of the fathers. Even in his day, the great mass of the godly, as he tells us more than once, were millennarians. Are chiliasm and heresy then inseparable? or is not the reverse the truth? I know that Augustine was against us, and he was much sounder in the faith; but his case is only a confirmation of our statements, for he is almost the only example in that age, of orthodoxy and anti-millennarianism being in union.

 

 

Anti-chiliasm was now spreading. And how did its abettors defend it? By denying the inspiration of the Apocalypse! “It is worthy of remark,” says Bishop Russell - no chiliast, - “that so long as the prophecies regarding the millennium were interpreted literally, the Apocalypse was received as an inspired production, and as the work of the apostle John; but no sooner did theologians find themselves compelled to, view its annunciations through the medium of allegory and metaphorical description, than they ventured to call in question its heavenly origin, its genuineness, and its authority

 

 

Dead churches have been pre-eminently anti-chiliastic, and from the pens of some of our coldest divines have come the strongest condemnations of our system. In the days of the Westminster Assembly there were many chiliasts to be found: Twisse, the prolocutor, and many members were such. A century after, hardly a supporter of the system was to be found in England. When there were life and soundness, there was chiliasm; when there were death and error, there was none.

 

 

[It must, however, be admitted that during the last hundred years, in Irvingism, Mormonism, Seventh Day Adventism in its origins, and various Tongues sects, the Powers of Darkness have repeated their strategy in Montanism - studiedly linking their manifestations with Advent truth, they have sought to besmirch it hopelessly in the eyes of the sober and the Scriptural. The Advent and the miraculous gifts are most counterfeited the nearer they draw. But feather-brained fanaticisms have no remotest resemblance to Millennial truth as it is presented in the Prophets; and the true antidote to perverted Millennarianism is not scepticism but Scripture.

 

 

Some ancient Chiliasm was superstitious and grotesque; but where it was merely gross or carnal, the error probably arose from ignorance of the two compartments of the Kingdom - a heavenly, for ‘the bodies celestial’ (1 Cor. 15: 40) of the risen, in the Holy City overhanging earth; and an earthly, for ‘bodies terrestrial’ on the earth itself, where men are still in the flesh. Paul prayed to be preserved unto the heavenly Kingdom (2 Tim. 4: 18) *- Ed. {D.M.P.}]

 

* Mr. Mauro is right in protesting, as we ourselves have done, against an extreme dispensationalism which, while justly repudiating the Law of Moses in the day of grace, stretches that Law so as to cover all the New Testament except four short Letters, thus robbing the Church of all but the entire Book of Grace: on the other hand, the man clever enough to make the Bible coherent without dispensational truth (the four epochs of conscience, law, grace, and righteousness) has never been born.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

40

 

THE DANGER OF AN

EXASPERATED SPIRIT + 4

 

 

 

Kadesh is the Spirit’s portrait of our modern age. In all the history of the Theocracy there is no such entire blank as Israel’s thirty-eight years in the Wilderness. At Kadesh, nearly four decades earlier, Israel, excommunicating themselves from the Promised Land, disbelieved God’s prophecies. backed by the reassurances of the two faithful Spies, and the unbelief was countered by the Oath of God that what they doubted they should not share.* Kadesh is not a resemblance, it is a photograph. For through an exactly corresponding nineteen centuries Christ’s coming Reign on earth has died out of the Church’s creed, becoming what the Holy Land became to Israel - a desert mirage; and the silent, chequered, tragic history of the Church has been largely a blank. So, after nearly forty years of unrecorded silence, of marches up and down leading nowhere, of weary waiting until a generation had died out, Israel is back at Kadesh once more, in what, the Holy Ghost says (1 Cor. 10: 11), is a portentous ‘figure of us And in the very heart of Kadesh is embedded an extraordinary danger now upon us; a danger entrapping, not the careless disciple, but the closest walkers with God, and not the rank and file, but Jehovah’s faithful and selected leaders; yet a danger on which, in the whole range of inspired literature, there is no greater silence on the part of teachers - [today in 2024] - in the Church of Christ. It is the danger of an exasperated spirit.

 

 

* Denial of the [Millennial] Kingdom is self -exclusion. “Whosoever shall not receive the Kingdom of God as a little child, he shall in no wise enter therein” (Mark 10: 15).

 

 

For if there was one man in those wandering tribes whose conspicuous office, holy character, faithful record, and constant devotion lifted him head and shoulders above the faithless crowd, and seemed to make entrance into the Reward absolutely secure, it was Moses. Here is a man of whom the Divine record is that he was faithful in all his house (Heb. 3: 5); a man whose renunciation on the threshold of discipleship was so great that he is chosen by the Holy Spirit as its eternal [aionios]* model; in spite of extreme age, a man with none of the crippling and lowering disabilities of years; the meekest man on earth (Num. 12: 3), and so armed in triple brass against outbursts of temper; with a devotion such that he alone of mankind ever asked to be blotted out of the Book of Life for others’ sake; a worker of miracles on a scale, and of a quality unparalleled save by our Lord; and the author of more Scripture than any man who ever lived. Yet this is the mighty servant of God who trips and falls in the last lap of his race. The warning could not be more pregnant and rousing. Nothing wins the ‘Prize’ (Phil. 3: 14), but a clean race run to a clean finish.

 

[* NOTE: See Heb. 5: 8, 9, R.V. : “...though he” - {i.e., Jesus, our High Priest} - “having been heard for his godly fear, though he was a Son, yet learned OBEDIENCE by the things which he suffered; [9] and having been made perfect, he became unto all them that OBEY him the author of eternal {Greek aionios} salvation...” Here the word ‘aionios’ is the same word shown in John 3: 16, and translated ‘eternal’ in most English Bibles: but in Hebrews 5: 9 it is used in an entirely different context! That is, in the sense of age-lasting, not ‘eternal’! Eternal salvation has nothing whatsoever to do with a regenerate person’s OBEDIENCE! (Rom. 8: 23; cf. Gal. 2: 16, R.V.). But, on the other hand, our life with Christ during the “Age” yet to come, and after the time of our Resurrection most certainly has! (Gal. 5: 21; Eph. 5: 5; Heb. 10: 35, 36; 12: 17ff., R.V.)]

 

 

For the very heart of the warning lies in the absolute justification of Moses’ exasperation. It is only necessary to recite the sacred narrative. “And the people strove with Moses” - casting off, with scorn, the faithful leadership, and undying intercession, of nearly four decades - “and spake, saying, Would God that we had died when our brethren died before the Lord! and why have ye brought the assembly of the Lord into this wilderness?” (Num. 20: 3). The whole modern situation lies embedded in Kadesh. First, all - [presently unfulfilled divine] - prophecy - [relative to their promised inheritance]* - comes to be totally denied; then follows the inevitable reaction and revolt against a leadership - for Moses had never faltered as to the goal - which had fastened the entire gaze of God’s people on Canaan, a future state; and finally, under an awful realization of Wilderness horrors - the sole - [and future] - destiny of God’s people left - faith in the very call of God is shaken to its foundations, and God’s Word becomes a dead letter, the pilgrimage a funeral, and the Wilderness a cemetery.

 

 

Now we see the danger. Jehovah had been rightly consulted: the dangerous Shekinah fires had shown themselves in the heavens in response: God’s mercy was to be unlocked from the rock. Moses and Aaron approach the rock. Before the vast assemblage Moses cries:- “Hear now, ye rebels; shall we bring you forth water out of this rock?” The comment of the Psalm (106: 32) lodges the sin in the exasperated utterance rather than in the double blow, his passionate action being only a symptom: “it went ill with Moses for their sakes [on their account] and he spake unadvisedly with his lips God had proposed a greater miracle - a fountain gushing from the rock without a gash: Moses curtly disobeys, striking the rock much as he might have desired strike the people. “They provoked his spirit says, the Psalmist: once he reproached them as rebellious (Deut. 3: 24) without offence, but now, in passion, he loses all command of himself, and by that fearful word - “ye rebels” - plumbs the depths of denunciation and excommunicates, in one sweeping sarcasm, the entire -[regenerate and redeemed] - People of God.*

 

* “It is too like Moreh” (M. Henry), For a believer, in a fit of passion, to brand another believer as a ‘rebel’ from God, an apostate, a limb of Satan, is an offence (Matt. 5: 22) on which the Most High is extraordinarily sensitive.

 

 

The sentence of God falls like lightning. “And the Lord said unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed not in me, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel” - because you have lost faith in My long-suffering to My [redeemed] people, and are taking their judgment into your own hands: ‘ye rebels, shall we bring you forth water?’ - “therefore ye shall not bring this assembly into the land It is obvious that reward, not [eternal] salvation, is what Moses forfeits, since later he appears with the Saviour on the Mount: he missed that for which he looked - “the recompense of the reward” (Heb. 11: 26). Yet the Lord softens the sentence with a concession to Moses, though not to Aaron - “Behold with thine eyes” (Deut. 3: 27) Pisgah; while excluded Moses is nevertheless, and even after exclusion, the only man ever buried by God. It is also exceedingly suggestive that, though he did not enter the Land, he died and was buried in the inheritance of Israel. So the very word of Moses in the context of his own rejection the Holy Spirit uses for our warning. Moses says:- “I must die in this land; I must not go over Jordan: ... take heed unto yourselves, for the Lord thy God is a devouring fire” (Deut. 4: 22, 24). The Holy Spirit takes up the very word in Hebrews:- “Let us have grace whereby we may offer service well-pleasing to God with reverence and awe: for our God is a consuming fire” (Heb. 12: 28). ‘Thy God says Moses; ‘our God says the Apostle, deliberately changing the phrase: for God, under Grace equally as under Law, is, where sin - [and our disobedience] - is concerned, avenging Fire.

 

 

A valuable lesson on the graded nature of sin springs from the severity of the sentence. The aged saint himself felt keenly the dreadful disaster. “And I besought the Lord, saying, O Lord God, let me go over, I pray thee; but the Lord was wroth with me, and hearkened not unto me and the Lord said unto me, Let it suffice thee; speak no more unto me of this matter” (Deut. 3: 24). The guilt of a sin turns on the standing of the sinner as well as on the enormity of the act. The supremest saintly achievement spells the greatest largesse of a grace which makes a man more responsible, not less (Amos 3: 2). Similar impatience’s and angers, only incomparably greater, in the ignorant and unstable people which He had overlooked again and again God could not pass over in him who was His very mouth-piece to the people.* Nor could He revoke the sentence. The reversal of a sentence announced in public and sealed by oath would have shaken the very foundations of God’s throne; and so he who had saved millions by his intercession, cannot save himself. Moses and Aaron had lost the race that Joshua and Caleb won.**

 

* It is also a comfort to recollect the aggravations of the offence which place it beyond mere exasperation. It was public; it occurred just after God’s miraculous action (Num. 20: 6), and immediately before fresh miracle, as Moses well knew; it was accompanied by violence - the double rupture of the rock; and it was lawlessness in the supreme lawgiver of all time.

 

**Actually, Moses lost Canaan. typically, he lost the Kingdom. It must never be forgotten that Israel, an earthly people of God bounded by earthly penalties and rewards, are a forecast, in their desert career, of a spiritual and heavenly people whose recompense is at the Judgment Seat; and their personal destiny in the hereafter does not enter into the type. “Now these things” - primarily the fivefold sinfulness which created the displeasure of God, and exclusion; though also the fivefold standing (ver. 2) which made them the sole people of God on earth - “happened unto them by way of figure” (1 Cor. 10: 11), and comprise the whole of the type. It only adds to the force of the type for us, and enhances it as solely a typical exclusion, that Moses, personally, not only has already shared in the Kingdom in glory (Luke 9: 31), but is also assured of a future place in it as one of the prophets (Luke 13: 28). Possible exclusion from the Millennial Kingdom is a solid Scripture fact taught alike by type and statement.

 

 

Therefore Jehovah Himself finally lays bare the profound principle underlying the judgment of His people. “Because ye believed not in me, TO SANCTIFY ME in the eyes of the children of Israel, ye shall not bring this assembly into the land”: “these are the waters of Meribah; because the children of Israel strove with the Lord, and he was SANCTIFIED” - showed Himself holy - “in them “God sanctified Himself upon them by a judgment, because they had not sanctified Him before the congregation” (Keil and Delitzsch). God must sanctify Himself from the sins of His people “if He be not glorified by us, He will be glorified on us” (M. Henry): I am proved holy (Jehovah says) by the judgment I inflict upon my most conspicuous and beloved servants, as much as by the mercy I grant to a murmuring people. For Kadesh is the place of the vindication of God. At Kadesh God’s oath excluded the disobedient generation: at Kadesh, once again, Miriam - one of the murmurers of old (Num. 12: 1) - is excluded by death, and Moses and Aaron by oath (Deut. 4: 21). Kadesh, this very age of ours of imminent danger, is the epoch which also embraces the Judgment Seat of Christ. “Let us therefore give diligence to enter into that rest, that none [of us] fall after the same example of disobedience” (Heb. 4: 11).*

 

 

 

Some one said to George Muller in his life’s eventide:- “When God calls you home, Mr. Muller, you will be like a ship entering harbour in full sail.” “Oh no,” he replied; “it will be only poor George Muller, who needs daily to pray - ‘Hold Thou me up in my goings, that my footsteps slip not’

 

* “Moses and Aaron among his priests: ... thou wast a God that forgavest them, though thou tookest vengeance of their doings” (Ps. 99: 6, 8). It is sad to see how otherwise godly evangelicals can soften, if not obliterate, the sorely needed and most blessed judicial warnings of God. “It was better for Moses,” says C. H. Mackintosh, “to see the land of Canaan, in company with God, than to enter it in company with Israel.” God’s people have never been so faithful as to make advisable a softening of His judgments which comes perilously near making His Word of none effect through our tradition. Moses’ death was penal (Num. 27: 12-14), though the mode of his burial was signal grace. “The sentence was perhaps the most effective possible revelation of His exceeding holiness. Even so the Lord will make His glory to be known and felt through His servants if they be faithful, but without them if they be faithless. He will be sanctified in us to our great reward in the one case, to our shame and sorrow in the other” (The Pulpit Commentary). The unique burial of Moses was manifestly in view of a no less unique resurrection on the Mount of Transfiguration,* a resurrection so unprecedented as to be disputed by Satan (Jude 9) in order to shadow forth the [Millennial] Kingdom’s risen saints, as Elijah embodied the living rapt.

 

 

[* NOTE: Many prophetic Bible students believe Moses will accompany Elijah during the Great Tribulation as God’s “two witnesses, and they shall prophecy a thousand two hundred and three score days, clothed in sackcloth. These are the two olive trees and the two candlesticks, standing before the Lord of the earth” ... “These have the power to shut the heaven, that it rain not during the days of their prophecy: and they have the power over the waters to turn them into blood, and to smite the earth with every plague, as often as they shall desire:” (Rev. 11: 3b-4, 6, R.V. Cf. Exod. 6: 6; 7; 17; 9: 14-17; Zech. 4: 3, 11, 14ff., R.V.). Both of these great men of God - Elijah the PROPHET and Moses God’s LAW-giver - both blew it” says Dr. Chuck Missler! That is, they were not used by God (in their God-given service) after that time. This fact is one of several reasons why I believe MOSES - (instead of ENOCH) - will testify before the Antichrist during the Great Tribulation: - which, I believe, will develop quickly after  the introduction of ‘digital currency’ world-wide.]

 

 

-------

 

 

THE BURIAL OF MOSES

 

 

By Nebo’s lonely mountain,

On this side Jordan’s wave,

In a vale in the land of Moab

There lies a lonely grave;

And no man knows that sepulchre,

And no man saw it e’er,

For the angels of God upturn’d the sod

And laid the dead man there.

 

 

That was the grandest funeral

That ever pass’d on earth;

But no man heard the trampling,

Or saw the train go forth -

Noiselessly as the daylight

Comes back when night is done,

And the crimson streak on ocean’s cheek

Grows into the great sun;

 

 

Noiselessly as the springtime

Her crown of verdure weaves,

And all the trees on all the hills

Open their thousand leaves:

So, without sound of music,

Or voice of them that wept,

Silently down from the mountain’s crown

The great procession swept.

 

 

Perchance the bald old eagle,

On grey Beth-peor’s height,

Out of his lonely eyrie

Look’d on the wondrous sight;

Perchance the lion, stalking,

Still shuns that hallow’d spot,

For beast and bird have seen and heard

That which man knoweth not.

 

 

But when the warrior dieth,

His comrades in the war,

With arms reversed and muffled drum,

Follow the funeral car;

 

 

They show the banners taken,

They tell his battles won,

And after him lead his masterless steed,

While peals the minute gun.

 

 

Amid the noblest of the land

Men lay the sage to rest,

And give the bard an honour’d place,

With costly marble dress’d,

In the great minster transept,

Where lights like glories fall,

And the organ rings, and the sweet choir sings,

Along the emblazon’d wall.

 

 

This was the truest warrior

That ever buckled sword;

This the most gifted poet

That ever breathed a word;

And never earth’s philosopher

Traced with his golden pen

On the deathless page truths half so sage

As he wrote down for men.

 

 

And had he not high honour,

The hillside for a pall,

To lie in state, while angels wait,

With stars for tapers tall,

And the dark rock-pines, like tossing plumes

Over his bier to wave,

And God’s own hand in that lonely land

To lay him in the grave?

 

 

O lonely grave in Moab’s land!

O dark Beth-peor’s hill!

Speak to these curious hearts of ours,

And teach them to be still:

God hath His mysteries of grace,

Ways that we cannot tell;

He hides them deep, like the hidden sleep

Of him He loved so well.

 

 

                                                                                                    - M. S. ALEXANDER.

 

 

-------

 

 

BECOME AS LITTLE CHILDREN*

 

[* NOTE: Addressing His ‘Disciples’ Jesus said: “Except ye turn, and become as little children, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 18: 3, 4). And again, - “Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall in no wise enter therein:” (Luke 18: 17, R.V.).]

 

 

Last night my little boy confess’d to me

Some childish wrong;

And kneeling at my knee

He pray’d with tears:-

Dear God, make me a man,

Like Daddy - wise and strong;

I know You can.

 

 

Then while he slept

I knelt beside his bed,

Confess’d my sins,

And pray’d with low-bow’d head

O God, make me a child,

Like my child here -

Pure, guileless, trusting Thee

With faith sincere.

 

 

                                                                                                   The Expositor.

 

 

PROVIDENCE

 

 

“The fly on a pillar in St. Paul's Cathedral is the likeness of each human being as he creeps along the vast pillars which support the universe. The sorrow which appears to be nothing but a yawning chasm or hideous precipice may turn out to be the joining or cement which binds together the fragments of our existence into a solid whole. That dark and crooked path in which we have to grope our way in doubt and fear may be but the curve which, in the full daylight of a brighter world, will appear to be the inevitable span of some majestic arch.”  - DEAN STANLEY.

 

 

-------

 

 

CHURCH DRAMA

 

 

For the first time since the Reformation, Canterbury Cathedral has been given over, this year [1929] and last, to a week of Medieval Drama, embracing the Father as an old man appearing above a parapet. Art in religion spells [apostasy in the Churches and] Rome. Mr. Andrew Carnegie spent large sums on free gifts of church organs on both sides of the Atlantic deliberately to change the doctrine of the churches.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

41

 

THE DEVOTION OF THE LORD JESUS

 

 

 

It has been said that he who could expound Leviticus in its fulness would give a fifth Gospel to the world. For the five great offerings of the Law are so many mirrors set round the central Christ, giving five portraits of our Lord from different angles, The Burnt Offering is the life of Christ; the Meal Offering is the character of Christ; the Peace Offering is the work of Christ; and the Sin Offerings are the death of Christ. This fivefold ritual is the first portrait of Messiah ever given.

 

 

The five great offerings were divided into two classes - the Sweet-savour offerings, ‘for acceptance an expression never used of the sin-offerings; and the Sin-offerings, ‘to make atonement an expression almost exclusively confined to them: the one class arose as a sweet aroma; the other disappeared in a burning consumption. Characteristically, separate words sunder their significance in the fire: in the Sweet-savour offerings the word means to ‘burn as incense to burn for deliciousness; in the Sin-offerings, the word means to ‘consume to destroy in wrath.

 

 

Now the Burnt Offering, the oldest and greatest of the Offerings, dating back to Abraham and Noah, and probably to Eden, portrays, in a mosaic of God’s own architecture, the self-immolation of a human soul. Totally sundered from sin, it is human life, in all its depths and possibilities, given back to God as He designed it when He made the worlds. Other offerings were food for the priests, in whole or in part: this offering was food for God only: God alone consumed it, and God consumed it all.

 

 

So the first portrait of Christ in the Bible is the sudden picture of a sinless life. “He shall offer it a male, without blemish” (Lev. 1: 10). The Rabbis reckoned fifty possible blemishes, any one of which would disqualify a sacrifice; five in the ear, three in the eyelid, eight in the eye, and so on. But the Burnt Offering went further. In order to ascertain the internal perfection, as well as the outward symmetry, the animal was flayed - “he shall flay the burnt offering, and cut it into its pieces” - so that it might be scrutinized through and through. The plucking and tearing off of the skin made naked the inner life and the deepest secrets of the soul. So the Lord Jesus was not only of that external moral beauty - “a Lamb without blemish and without spot” (1 Pet. 1: 19) - which has made Him the admiration of the world; but sifted by man, sifted by Satan, sifted by God, His thoughts, emotions, will - all torn open - all bore the test. Scripture records the flayed Sacrifice. His Judge says:- “I find no fault in him”: His Betrayer says:- “I have betrayed innocent blood”: His Tempter “cometh and hath nothing” in Him. But incalculably the most important is the flaying by God. “Thou hast proved mine heart, Thou hast visited me in the night season; Thou hast tried me, and findest nothing” (Ps. 17: 3).

 

 

Now the Burnt Offering is life offered to God, as the Sin Offering is a death offered to God; and therefore the Burnt Offering (Bethlehem) comes first, and the Sin Offerings (Calvary) come last. But complete devotion to God without and within - a holocaust - necessarily covers more than life, and includes (if God demand it) martyrdom; and so we read - “and he shall KILL the bullock before the Lord and he shall kill it on the side of the altar northward before the Lord” (Lev. 1: 11). Judgment comes from the north (Jer. 5: 6); and Jerusalem and Mount Zion, where the Lord was crucified, are “on the sides of the north” (Ps. 48: 2). Devotion to God knows no limit except life. For creation is an act of the sovereignty of God: life, at all, is purely a gift: the Creator therefore may give life, sustain life, or withdraw life, and no wrong is done to the creature. The limit of the gift lies solely with the Giver. So complete devotion offers back all to God; and, in ages of martyrdom, God accepts it. Could self-surrender go further than a sinless Being yielding up his sinless life to the Most High?

 

 

Now the consuming of the sacrifice by fire is its absorption by God: “our God is a consuming fire which absorbs the sinless life, but destroys the sinful: and so critical, so vital to the whole offering, was the fire that “it shall not be put out”; “it shall ever be burning”; “IT SHALL NEVER GO OUTSo, in the Sin Offering, not one moment did the wrath of God lift from the hanging Christ. “The priest shall offer whole, and BURN it upon the altar The fire, searching the whole, produces, in this sweet-savour offering, nothing but delicious aroma: utterly analyzed - for there was no avenue to pain unopened, in the dissected and vivisected Lord - Jesus (as it was said of the Burnt Offering by God) - “is my oblation, my food” (Num. 28: 2):it is the Lord Jesus as the satisfaction of the heart of God. “The Lord remember all thy offerings, and accept” - literally, turn to ashes - “thy burnt sacrifice” (Ps. 20: 3). A total devotion, a vindicated Law, a glorified God, a perfect substitution - all lay in the little heap of holy ash. So the fire never ceases to consume, nor the aroma to delight. “The burnt offering shall be upon the altar all night unto the morning” - all through the midnight ages, until Eternity dawns: “fire shall be kept burning on the altar CONTINUALLY; it shall not go out” (Lev. 6: 9, 13) day or night - so burning for all eternity. The extinction of the Fire would be the ruin of salvation, and the damnation of the saved. God’s eye and heart are feasted perpetually by the Perfect Man, and through the long night and through all the Eternity beyond His perpetual joy is CHRIST.

 

 

Now we encounter a forecast of the actual historical fulfilment beyond all coincidence. Two wholly sundered actions the Priest performed over the Ashes. “And the priest robed in his sacrificial linen, “shall take up the ashes” - the body when the fire has finished with it; is all that the fire has left; God has absorbed the sacrifice - “and he shall put them beside the altar” (Lev. 6: 10); and there “the ashes are poured out” (Lev. 4: 12). “Now in the place where he was crucified there was a garden and in the garden a new tomb”; “there then (for the tomb was nigh at hand) they laid Jesus” (John 19: 42). But now, after the ash had thus been deposited near the Cross, or altar, “the priest shall put off his garments, and shall put on other garments” - a sudden change of extraordinary significance. Leaving his discarded garments where he had sprinkled the blood - the linen clothes in which the Lord had been swathed, now left in the tomb - the ashes which he had deposited beside the Altar the priest now removes, but not before he has divested himself of the simple white ephod, and has assumed his robes of glory and beauty. “He shall carry forth the ashes without the camp” - Jesus leaves Jerusalem in the moment of resurrection - “into a clean place” (Lev. 6: 11): so, the Holy Spirit using the exact word, our Lord is borne upward, in new robes of resurrection glory and beauty, into the ‘clean’ courts above. “While He blessed them, he was parted from them, and was CARRIED up into heaven” (Luke 24: 51).

 

 

So now we arrive at the critical, the saving point of the Burnt Offering. Almost alone among the offerings, the skin - the only part of the sacrifice that had not been given to God upon the Altar - was handed over to the priest for his personal possession as wearing apparel. “And the priest that offereth any man’s burnt offering, even the priest shall have to himself THE SKIN of the burnt offering which he hath offered” (Lev. 7: 8). The skin had been taken off before the animal was burnt: it is the product of the animal’s life, not of its death: it is all that the world sees of the living creature - its character and conduct. It is the active righteousness of Christ, the imputed obedience: it is that of which He cried - “It is finished before blood-atonement had even begun - the skin detached whole, before the carcase was fired. The Skin had been the clothing of the sacrifice, so that, after death, it can become the clothing of the priest: all that was visible of the life of Christ - clothing that is part of Him, and that exactly expresses His person - becomes my clothing; His righteous conduct becomes my righteous conduct: I put on the Skin, and I am clothed with Christ. “He hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, He hath covered me with the robe of righteousness” (Isa. 61: 10).

 

 

So, then, in the Burnt Offering the righteousness of the living Substitute is transferred to the guilty offerer: in the Sin Offering the guilt of the doomed offerer is transferred to the slaughtered Sacrifice. “Him who knew no sin He made to be sin on our behalf [the Sin Offering], that we might become [not righteous, but] the righteousness of God [the Burnt Offering] in Him” (2 Cor. 5: 21). The moment after the sinner laid his hand on the Sin Offering, it was put to death  - instantly it incurred the knife ; but before the Burnt Offering was killed it was pronounced an ‘atonement that is, a covering! - the skin, which, since the offerer is the sinner ‑ J the priest is the believer, is given to the priest.* It is the very Skin with which (symbolically) God clothed the fallen race in the dawn of the world. “His blood it is which removes all curse; but it is His obedience which merits all glory” (Dean Law). The intrinsic value of a cloak depends in no way whatever on the character of its wearer, its entire value turns both on its own exquisiteness - some sables and sealskins, for example, being enormously costly - and also (as with the silver fox) on the rarity of the animal from which it is taken; and a cloak is entirely valueless unless worn. Thus Paul has defined saving action for all ages. “I count all things to be loss, that I may gain Christ, and be found in him, not having a righteousness of mine own, even that which is of the law, but that [righteousness, that active obedience to the Law, that perfect life] which is [obtained] through faith in Christ, THE RIGHTEOUSNESS WHICH” - like a woven cloak - “is FROM GOD UPON” - let fall upon the shoulders of - “FAITH” (Phil. 3: 8).

 

* Let thy priests be clothed with righteousness” (Ps. 132: 9).

 

 

-------

 

 

OUR WHOLE BURNT OFFERING

 

 

When I looked into his face and saw him brush back his hair from his brow, heard him speak of the trials and conflicts and the victories, I said:- “General Booth, tell me what has been the secret of your success.” He hesitated a second, and I saw the tears come into his eyes and steal down his cheeks, and then he said:- “I will tell you the secret. God has had all there was of me to have. There have been men with greater opportunities; but from the day I got the poor of London on my heart, and a vision of what Jesus Christ could do, I made up my mind that God would have all of William Booth there was. And if there is anything of power in the Salvation Army to-day, it is because God has had all the adoration of my heart, all the power of my will, and all the influence of my life.” I learned from William Booth that the greatness of a man’s power is the measure of his surrender. - WILBUR CHAPMAN, D.D.

 

 

*       *       *       *

 

 

42

 

THE FIRST MEN IN HEAVEN + 1

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

The crash of earthquake and portents of terror in the heavens, ushering in judgments so unmistakable that men hide themselves in the rocks, have hardly subsided, when, for the first time in the history of the world, a body of men are seen in heaven. The Church period is over (Revelation 2. & 3.): the Judgment Throne has actually been set in the heavens (chapter 4.): the Lamb of God has moved forward to begin the great drama, authorized by the Throne (chapter 5.): and now, with a terrified humanity calling upon the rocks below, with shifting constellations under their feet, and broken tombs on earth’s surface, suddenly a vast human multitude is in heaven. “Hitherto,” as Dr. Swete observes, “only the Elders, the Seraphim, and the Angels have had places assigned to them in the presence of God and the Lamb; but in this prospective vision the presence-chamber is crowded with a vast assemblage of men, drawn from every nation upon the earth and by some unexplained process transported to heaven

 

 

THE IDENTITY

 

 

The curious emphasis that is cast by the question which the Elder, puts to John on the identity of this huge concourse has been justified by the chaos of attempted answers. “On all the prevalent systems of interpretation,” says Dr. Seiss, “the question of the Elder - ‘Who are they, and whence came they?’ - is still the great question to be decided: there is scarcely one point with reference to these palm-bearers upon which expositors are agreed.” What race? how here? why holy? out of what world? travelling to what destiny? John himself disavows all knowledge, and throws the question back on his august questioner:- “My lord” - the address is one of deep reverence, as to a heavenly being (Alford) - “Thou knowest,” (Rev. 7: 14). The secret (says John) is locked in the breasts of the Angels.

 

 

AN EMERGENT HOST

 

 

So the Heavenly Hierarch discloses the secret. “These are they which come” - these are the ones coming (Lange), such as come (Swete) - “out of the great tribulation”: not did come, as though all tribulation were historically over; or will come, as though they were men still on the earth; but are coming, these are they coming (Alford) in a train of constantly augmenting masses (Lange), the first human host ever seen before the Throne. Down below, the Lord has just sealed in the forehead Israel’s elect, the nucleus of all God’s work and witness in the Day of Terror: these, broken up out of the tombs as His heavenly elect, have left tribulation beneath their feet for ever; “the choice of this earth, the chief in spiritual contests, the agonized, the disparaged, the flower of the Church’s chivalry” (T. T. Lynch).*

 

*That these are not all the redeemed is obvious from the reply given (Rev. 6: 11) to the souls under the Altar, themselves still unraised, that fresh martyr groups have yet to be enrolled - martyrs under the Church of Rome (Rev. 17: 6), and under the Lawless One (Rev. 15: 2), who is not yet arisen.

 

 

THE GREAT TRIBULATION

 

 

But now we arrive at a widely discussed problem of critical importance. What is the ‘great tribulation’ out of which they emerge? A key to the Apocalypse, which profoundly modifies even its style and language, and which is brought vividly forward in the present chapter, is the duality of the people of God - Israel and the Church - dealt with throughout, in parallel, but diverse, redemptions. The faithful of Israel are here sealed from tribulation on earth; the faithful of the Church are transplanted out of tribulation to heaven so (it is crucial to observe) there are two ‘great tribulations’; and while Israel has a tribulation ‘great’ in intensity (three and a half years), the Church has a tribulation ‘great’ in duration (two thousand years).* Exactly appropriately, therefore, this heavenly escape is out of the age-long agony, “the whole sum of the trial of the saints” (Alford); for the fearful portents in the heavens, from which these have escaped, occur “before the great and terrible day of the Lord come” (Joel 2: 31)**; and the Great Tribulation - the day of Jacob’s trouble (Jer. 30: 7), “the tribulation of those days” (Matt. 24: 29) - cannot begin till (long after this) Satan is cast to earth (Rev. 12: 12) when the Manchild is already on high. There is chronological sequence in the Apocalypse; and chronologically the judgments of the Trumpets and the Bowls have not yet even remotely begun. So that which these leave is that which we experience. There are no short cuts to glory. God has had one Son without sin, but He has never had a son without sorrow.

 

 

* “In Revelation ‘tribulation’ is only spoken of in relation to the churches: Rev. 1: 9; 2: 9, 10, 13. ‘In the world ye shall have tribulation’ (John 16: 33) is the abiding motto of the saints of the Church” (Govett).

 

** Ignorance of the fact that there are two convulsions of the heavenly bodies, one before the Great Tribulation (Acts 2: 20) and one after (Matt. 24: 29), is an ignorance for which the world pays dearly: for the first convulsion throws mankind into wild panic (Rev. 6: 15), in expectance of final judgment; while the second finds them lulled, by the passing of the first, into the false conviction that stellar revolutions presage no judgment at all.

 

 

The path of sorrow and that path alone

Leads to the land where sorrow is unknown.

 

 

Bruised and beaten, they have come, not only out of affliction, but out of great affliction; and they ‘stand’ - roused from the recumbency of death - before the Throne, the apex of safety, as well as the acme of danger*

 

* To suppose, as some do, that they emerge from the Day of Jacob’s Trouble does not bear investigation. A mass of saved so enormous as to be innumerable, while natural as the outcome of twenty (perhaps sixty) centuries, would be startling indeed as the fruit of three and a half years; and when it is remembered that they are altogether distinct from the massed nations on the right of the King on Olivet (Matt. 25: 33), the fruits of Tribulation evangelism, it is seen to be impossible.

 

 

THE FEAST OF TABERNACLES

 

 

The Old Testament Type, which this scene accomplishes, is a final and decisive proof that the tribulation from which the countless multitude comes is the age-long travail of the Church. “The palms,” as Hengstenberg says, “are beyond doubt those of the Feast of Tabernacles; and ‘He shall Spread His tabernacle over them’ (ver. 15) is also an allusion to that Feast.” God shall be their tent. The Feasts, beginning with Passover, or conversion at Calvary, unfold, in studied succession, the entire history of the Church, closing in heaven, in the final and joyous redemption of the Feast of Tabernacles. “With the feast of tabernacles all field-labour [earthly toil: the ‘field’ is the ‘world’] ceased, and the period of rest [the Sabbatismos] began. Every one saw himself recompensed for the labours of the year, his cares were gone, the whole fulness of the divine blessing was in the hands of all” (Bahr). This is decisive proof that it is our immemorial tribulation out of which the vast assemblage emerges; for the Feast of Tabernacles was deliberately designed to recall to Israel a finished pilgrimage, the nomad life of the Wilderness for ever over, the Holy Land attained. John alone names palms in the New Testament, so linking together the type and the Kingdom; the eighth, or great day of the Feast, being the Eternity beyond. And so in perfect accordance the trials from which they are delivered - hunger, thirst, heat, tears - are in no way peculiar to, or even descriptive of Jacob’s Trouble; but are designedly the wilderness distresses of a prolonged pilgrimage: “all who suffered, fought, and conquered, in the great tribulation though which every Christian, from the beginning of the ages of the Cross down to the end, has to pass” (Lange).*

 

* The whole chapter is stamped with selectiveness. The day of recompense having dawned, the faithful of Israel (a selection only) are kept through the Tribulation, while the faithful of the Church (a selection only) are kept from the Tribulation; in exact accordance with the promise to the Advent watcher - “Because thou didst keep the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of trial, that hour which is to come upon the whole world, to try them that dwell upon the earth” (Rev. 3: 10).

 

 

REDEMPTION

 

 

Appropriately, therefore, with Angels rejoicing around them en masse, even as they had rejoiced in single conversions (Luke 15: 10), their cry is the ‘Hosanna’ of the multitudes at the Feast, bearing palms, and spreading palms, before the Lord (John 12: 13). “And they cry” - are crying, for John hears the multitudinous chant as a solo - “Salvation unto” - salvation is peculiarly the creation and the gift, salvation exclusively belongs unto - “God and the Lamb All are lost souls but for Christ. So also the Elder gives Heaven’s reason for their presence. Why are men, so diverse - out of every tribe and nation and people and tongue - yet so one? why are men, so drastically distinct in blood and gift and tradition and race, all merged into an indistinguishable throng? why is such a sinful mass in heaven at all? “They washed their robes” - the aorist [tense] looks back to the moment on earth when, at conversion, the cleansing was wrought - “and made them white in the blood of the Lamb: THEREFORE, are they before the Throne* All Heaven knows no salvation but the blood-theology of a sacrificed Lamb: so that believers who deny it either are not in the throng, or else have left this clause of their creed in the Tribulation. There is no ‘Lamb’ in the Angels’ song; for they neither need, nor could share, our human Calvary: whereas our presence in Heaven for ever rests, solely and wholely, on what no diamond can purchase, and that to which king’s treasures are not to be compared - the Blood of God’s Lamb.

 

* But it seems to mean more than simply conversion. “The doctrine the imputation of Christ’s righteousness to the believer is a blessed truth; but it is not the one taught here. Christ’s robe is one: here ‘robes’ are spoken of in the plural. These were not spotless; but they owned their faults, and removed them by Jesus’ blood” (Govett). So also Alford:- “The act was a life-long one, - the continued purification of the man, body, soul, and spirit, by the application of the blood of Christ in its cleansing power.” These are sanctified as well as justified; not only bathed, but foot-cleansed (John 13: 10). The robe is always symbolic of the conduct and not of the person.

 

 

BLISS

 

 

The final description of their bliss the poet Burns used to say he could never read without tears. How profoundly touching: so moving, to us, is the vision of the Tearless Land, that it creates tears! “They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun strike upon them, nor any heat” - the burning sirocco or (for the Elder changes Isaiah’s word) the consuming heat of the stake: “for the Lamb that is in the midst of the throne shall be their Shepherd”; the human Lamb, the Divine Shepherd: “and shall guide men unto fountains of waters of lifelife’s fountains, as the Elder changes Isaiah’s emphasis (Isa. 49: 10) “and God shall wipe away every tear from their eyes Tears are one of God’s principal recipes for consecration; but when the consecration is complete, the medicine disappears. Nor is this a mirage of the desert: it is a Pisgah vision.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE CHURCH TRIUMPHANT

 

 

For all the saints who from their labours rest,

Who Thee by faith before the world confessed,

Thy Name, O Jesu, be for ever blessed.

Alleluia!

 

 

Thou wast their Rock, their Fortress, and their Might:

Thou, Lord, their Captain in the well-fought fight;

Thou, in the darkness drear, their one true Light.

Alleluia!

 

 

Oh! may Thy soldiers, faithful, true and bold,

Fight as the saints who nobly fought of old,

And win, with them, the victor’s crown of gold.

Alleluia !

 

 

And when the strife is fierce, the warfare long,

Steals on the ear the distant triumph-song,

And hearts are brave again, and arms are strong

Alleluia !

 

 

The golden evening brightens in the west:

Soon, soon, to faithful warriors cometh rest;

Sweet is the calm of Paradise the blest.

Alleluia !

 

 

But lo! there breaks a yet more glorious day;

The saints triumphant rise in bright array;

The King of Glory passes on His way.

Alleluia !

 

 

From earth’s wide bounds, from ocean’s farthest coast,

Through gates of pearl streams in the countless host,

Singing to Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, -

Alleluia!

 

 

                                                                                            BISHOP WALSHAM HOW.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

43

 

THE KINGDOM IN MYSTERY + 1

 

 

 

Perhaps there is no source of error in exposition more frequent - so frequent as possibly to hint some chronic defect in the human mind as it differs from the Divine - than the stubbornness with which men will see one thing only, when God is looking at two. Duality - the out-pull and the in-pull that balances the universe - is of the very texture of things; and yet no great truth rides in a chariot of revelation but some unbalanced charioteer leaps aboard to urge it over a precipice. It is a vital of exposition that apparently conflicting Scriptures must never be made, like opposing parks of artillery, to fire into and silence one another. “No prophecy of scripture is of isolated interpretation” (2 Pet. 1: 20), but subserves a perfect whole.

 

 

This duality dwells richly and subtilly in the great Scripture phrase - ‘the Kingdom of Heaven’. Several of our Lord’s parables which contain the expression lodge the Kingdom in this dispensation; and it is this aspect of it which (outside the Apostolic epoch) has always appealed most powerfully to the Church of God. The Court of Appeals in New York State, reversing the decision of a lower court on a will which left £1,000 for “the advancement of Christ’s Kingdom on earth,” defined, a few months ago, the Kingdom thus:-  Christ’s Kingdom on earth is the community or whole body of Christ’s faithful people collectively; all those who are spiritually united to Christ as the head of the Church, without regard to differences of creed * and doctrine. “It was both shrewd equity and sound theology; for between the Sower starting out to sow, and the angels descending to reap, the Lord sets ‘the Kingdom of heaven which, in its aspect of leaven or mustard, or a blend of wheat and tares, can by no wildest interpretation be located in the Millennium. We who believe “have been translated into the Kingdom of the Son of His love” (Col. 1: 13); and all who reject our Lord while the Nobleman is away (Luke 19: 14) He Himself catalogues by their confession - “We will not that this man reign over usThis is the Kingdom which is never shaken (Heb. 12: 28), for it can never cease.

 

* The judgment means denominational creed. It is self-evident that the court of Appeals does not mean to include Mohammedans or atheists.

 

 

Thus the Kingdom in this sense is synonymous with the Church, or the hiatus between the two Advents; what our Lord calls “the mysteries [i.e., things hidden from the foundation of the world (Matt. 13: 35), or Church truth] of the kingdom of heaven “ (Matt. 13: 11), which it is given only to disciples to understand - the mystical kingdom of grace. It is a kingdom over the heart and life, with no visible royalty and no earthly metropolis; * its citizenship is in heaven (Phil. 3: 20, R.V.), and therefore anywhere and everywhere on earth its citizens are pilgrims, and so strangers; it is constantly at war, but only with the world-rulers of this darkness, the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places; its weapons are not carnal, and in consequence it is improperly linked with State establishments and temporal power; it is so to embody the grace of its Saviour-King that its Victoria Cross is unresisting martyrdom; its commerce is in the heavenlies, and therefore it is forbidden to lay up treasure on earth, and takes joyfully the spoiling of its goods; and it is throneless and homeless until the hour when the Holy City overhangs the Millennial earth. The gates of this Kingdom stand ajar for all mankind; and it has but one royal road into it, one exclusive path - the second birth.

 

* This is the deadly answer which Mr. Simmonds justly brought against British-Israelism in our last issue. After the Kingdom’s only King has not only been rejected but murdered, any physical Kingdom set up in His absence, and purporting to be His, is a self-branded imposture. Such are the ‘fifth monarchy’ of Cromwell’s age; Dr. Dowle’s Zion City on Lake Huron; the ‘sovereign state’ of the Vatican; and (among non-Christian sects) Utah as the Kingdom of God on earth, with the North American Indians as the lost Ten Tribes. The visible Kingdom is impossible without the - [the manifested bodily presence of the] - visible King.

 

 

Yet it is equally certain that in the same Gospels and Epistles, and from the same Sacred Lips, in passages more numerous, and clear beyond all dispute, the Kingdom of God is regarded as wholly future, the epoch following immediately on the Second Advent. For David’s throne is the birth-gift of the Christ (Luke 1: 32), and David’s throne has never been in the heavens. Satan saw this; for what he offered our Lord - the kingdoms of the world - was what he saw that Prophecy makes over to Messiah: “I will give thee the nations for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession” (Ps. 2: 8). So when Christ revealed that some standing around should not experience death until they had actually seen the Kingdom of God come with power, it was no obscure and persecuted Church that was unveiled, but a Christ literally present and transfigured, on earth, and accompanied by the rapt and the risen. So also the Kingdom in which our Lord will drink again with His Apostles (Mark 14: 25) is the Millennial, since wine is not made nor drunk in heaven: it is the Kingdom for the coming of which the Church, so long as she is on the earth is to pray, since the Kingdom is not herself, and it is to be prayed down to earth: it is the Kingdom of which Paul says decisively - “flesh and blood” - the living, unchanged - “cannot inherit the Kingdom of God; neither doth corruption” - the dead, unrisen - “inherit incorruption” (1 Cor. 15: 50). The only occasion on which the simple phrase is used - ‘the Kingdom’ - it is, without doubt or dispute, the Millennial (1 Cor. 15: 24); for it follows resurrection; while yet it makes way for the Eternal Kingdom. The Kingdom of Heaven, says our Lord, is “in that day” (Matt. 7: 21, 22); and angels, not men, will establish it (Matt. 13: 41).

 

 

So, therefore, since it is one Kingdom with two aspects - for there is but one King - there are certain vital characteristics which, belonging to both, are expressed in Scriptures that belong exclusively to neither. “The Kingdom of God is not eating and drinking” - in neither aspect does it consist in banqueting, though in both there is food - “but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost” (Rom. 14: 17). Neither is in word only, but also in power (1 Cor. 4: 20). Into both, publicans and harlots enter sooner than the wealthy or the Pharisee. Both Kingdoms come not by watching, nor by local discovery, but only by the second birth (John 3: 3); and the Kingdom must be within us ere ever we can be within it (Luke 17: 21). John the Baptist heralded both: Christ preached both: Paul died with both upon his lips. Since the principle of the one is Grace, and the principle of the other is justice, the conduct under each is worlds asunder, exactly as is the action of the Saviour in the two epochs. The Kingdom in mystery is the vital prelude to the Kingdom in manifestation, and the Kingdom of grace is the training-ground for the Kingdom of glory.* So therefore the great command, even to Apostles, is - “Seek ye FIRST the Kingdom of God” (Matt. 6: 33), for all our regenerate life is to be the pursuit of a [millennial] glory beyond the grave; and “no man, having put his hand to the plough, and looking back, is FIT” [ready, prepared, ripe] “for the Kingdom of God” (Luke 9: 62), since fitness for the coming Kingdom springs, not from conversion only, but from a face which, having fled from Sodom, never looks back.

 

* Salvation carries with it the Eternal Kingdom, and so of all [regenerate] believers we read - “They shall reign for ever and ever” (Rev. 22: 5); but for the ‘Age’ succeeding this a seven-tiered pyramid of sanctity is unfolded, with the warning words:- “if ye do these things, ye shall never stumble; for thus shall be richly supplied unto you the entrance” - the wealth of a millennium’s priority - “into the eternal kingdom” (2 Pet. 1: 10).

 

 

-------

 

 

LITTLE CHILDREN OF THE KING

 

 

Quiet, Lord, my froward heart,

Make me teachable and mild,

Upright, simple, free from art,

Make me as a weaned child:

From distrust and envy free,

Pleased with all that pleases Thee.

 

 

What Thou shalt to-day provide

Let me as a child receive;

What to-morrow may betide

Calmly to Thy wisdom leave:

’Tis enough that Thou wilt care,

Why should I the burden bear?

 

 

As a little child relies

On a care beyond its own

Knows he’s neither strong nor wise -

Fears to stir a step alone -

Let me thus with Thee abide,

As My Father, Guard, and Guide.

 

 

Thus preserved from Satan’s wiles,

Safe from dangers, free from fears,

May I live upon Thy smiles,

Till the promised hour appears

When the sons of God shall prove

All their Father’s boundless love.

 

 

                                                                                                        - JOHN NEWTON.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

44

 

YOUTH BEFORE THE ADVENT + 3

 

 

By D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

The reign of Solomon, prince of peace - magnificent, warless - is a divine forecast of Messiah’s glorious Reign: David, hunted, battling for the Throne, but laying up enormous hidden wealth for the Temple and the Palace, is the Gospel era: the intermediate generation between the two, appearing at the close of David’s epoch, is Absalom, the youthful generation on the threshold of Advent. This striking type explains the curious prominence of Absalom as the embodiment and photograph of an age. For before Absalom there opened a golden vision of limitless possibilities. The son of a praying father, and brought up in a godly home, he possessed all the culture of his day, combined with great natural beauty, a rare gift of winning others to himself, and the immediate succession to the most glorious Kingdom and Temple earth has ever seen. It is the generation inheriting the Christian ages and standing on the threshold of the Advent. Yet the golden vision proved a gigantic mirage. ‘Absalom’ - meaning the ‘father’ or ‘predecessor’ of ‘peace’ - predeceased the peace he never saw; he sought a throne, and found a grave; and the peculiar manner of his death affixed on him the direct Curse of God.

 

 

GIFTED YOUTH

 

 

An emphasis is laid on the physical perfection of Absalom unique in the Bible. “In all Israel there was none to be so much praised as Absalom for his beauty: from the sole of his foot even to the crown of his head there was no blemish in him” (2 Sam. 14: 25). In science, in sport, in hygiene, in war, in invention, in exploration - in finished accomplishment in all that is admirable and splendid in the flesh - youth to-day is probably unsurpassed.* It is extraordinary how our Lord has foreshadowed exactly this of the generation on the threshold of the Advent. “The evil spirit findeth it [the generation he formerly possessed] empty, swept, and garnished” - exorcized, clean, cultured; a civilization largely without idolatry, witchcraft, and demon possession, - hygenic and healthy, - rich in science and art: “and he taketh seven other spirits more evil than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: even so shall it be unto this generation” (Matt. 12: 45). With curious though unconscious aptness Sir Robertson Nicoll remarks:- “To educate without religion is to enlarge and refine the habitation of the devil in the human heart

 

* Thus a recent writer’s praise of the youth of to-day need not conflict with prophecy. He says: - “I like them for their frankness and humour, their loyal comradeship, their passionate sincerity, their driving energy, and their freshness of outlook. They have no evasions or repressions, they do not dodge difficulties; and are for the most part fearless, honest and adventurous. They are gloriously free from snobbishness.” It is curious that the two girls chosen this year for supreme beauty - ‘Miss Universe’ (Miss Goldarbeiter) and ‘Miss Europe’ (Miss Simon) - are both Jewesses, that is, actually of Absalom’s blood.

 

 

UNREGENERATE YOUTH

 

 

Now in the roots of Absalom’s life will be found all the tragedy of modern youth. Absalom had a David for a father, but a heathen princess for his mother; and under the fatal shadow of this spiritual disunion in the home we search the sacred record in vain for his conversion; and without conversion in every one of us is a slumbering volcano of hell. The only time Absalom is ever recorded (2 Sam. 15: 7) as seeking Jehovah it was as a cloak for seizing his father’s throne. Eighty per cent. of the scholars in our Sunday Schools leave them unconverted. A year ago a youth named Hickman, on the gallows for the foul murder of a girl, revealed the enormity that modern education can produce. Before execution he made this confession:- “During high school I took interest in evolution and atheism and denied the Christian faith. Therefore I became susceptible to worse errors and finally took up crime and murder. I don’t want any young man to study my crime, for all can see where it has led to. My mind was so warped by over-education that I became a fiend incarnate, living without consideration of mercy toward mankind. I decided to kill a human being as a supreme experiment, to test my limitations. I even planned to lead the career of a super-criminal, masking my activities under the guise of a Christian minister. If I had not been caught when I was, I undoubtedly would have committed even greater atrocities than the murder of Marion Parker

 

 

CHIVALRY

 

 

Now Absalom’s first recorded act, the germ and embryo of his career, and the kernel of modern youth, is both youth’s point of approach and its point of departure. Stung by the intolerable wrong done by his brother Amnon to his sister Tamar, and by the callous lethargy of the King, who ought to have been not alone the fountain of honour but the executor of justice, Absalom murders Ammon. The chivalry is altogether lovable: the lawlessness - for what in David would have been an execution (Lev. 20: 17) is in Absalom a murder - is deadly. To redress lawlessness by lawlessness is only to breed lawlessness. Modern youth thinks itself emancipated from convention when what it emancipates itself from is the moral law. Last year the Senior Class oration in the Commemoration at Harvard expressed youth’s revolt:- “A new and different generation represents a fundamental change since the War. It has freed itself from old dogma, or, better still, the old ‘cant’; even from can’t, with the apostrophe. It essentially accepts no faith (in the old meaning of the word) and has little, save in the inevitability of progress, and is in no danger of using outworn creeds and methods to cure the evils it has inherited” (Literary Digest, July 14th, 1928).* It is very solemn that the whole hope of the world lies in - Absalom.

 

* The lawlessness of youth, of all symptoms the most ominous, and inevitable when the restraints of religious faith are cast off, is far more characteristic of our day than any of us has yet realized. American figures - the only ones available - show that more than 80 per cent. of all crimes, from murder down to petty misdemeanours, are committed by persons less than 22 years old; that the average age of burglars has decreased in ten years from 29 to only 21 years; that 51 per cent. of automobile thefts are committed by persons under 18; and that 42 per cent. of the unmarried mothers are schoolgirls averaging 16 years of age. Absalom’s public and shameless immorality (2 Sam. 16: 22), lawless even in a lawless age, forecasts the sharp moral decadence of an age [yet] to close as Sodom (Luke 17: 30).

 

 

REBELLION

 

 

In Absalom there opens a deep and deadly breach between the generation closing and the generation rising. His character, from the moment that he takes the wrong turn, develops with amazing rapidity. A ‘fast’ youth - “Absalom prepared him a chariot and horses, and fifty men to run before him” (2 Sam. 15: 1) - he plots his father’s overthrow, and his dream of world-power in his own hands is the epitome of Youth’s mirage to-day. “Oh, that I were made judge in the land, that any man which hath any suit or cause might come unto me, and I would do him justice” (2 Sam. 15: 4) - the undying dream of the lawless that they are the ideal administers of law. Lawlessness logically culminates in apostasy. Absalom knew perfectly that he struck at Lord’s Anointed when the counsel to murder David “pleased Absalom well The Christ must be dethroned before coronation of the Antichrist. In Russia, from the six million Communist youths a manifesto has been issued with these words:- “We, the young godless ones, are waging active war against our religious parents: we will climb up to heaven and sweep away the gods.” The breach between the two generations is also a breach between the rising generation and God.

 

 

DOOM

 

 

Very moving, unutterably solemn, truly awful is the going down of the sun. The climax is altogether of God. Splendidly built, magnificently moulded, hangs a twisting convulsive figure, with head jammed, and javelins sticking through the heart, his magnificent hair the rope of his own scaffold, on a gallows man never made, By what lawyers call an ‘act of God,’ that is, a providence that has behind it Deity, the generation is executed. in type - for “cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree” (Gal. 3: 13); and divinely gifted youth, proxime accessit to the Kingdom, its very beauty its halter, summoned (as youth is) for war - like the ten million dead on the plains of Europe - goes down at Armageddon in a slaughter man never made.*

 

* Russia has nearly 5,000,000 men trained as soldiers under thirty, part [typically] it may be of the hordes to descend on the Holy Land (Ezek. 38); India:s 50,000 university graduates are “almost solid” for revolt, says the Secretary of the Indian, Council of Y.M.C.A.’s; and China’s youth is seething to pour across the Euphrates one day behind the Yellow Kings (Rev. 16: 12).

 

 

Exquisitely does the type present our duty in the modern age. “And David went up the ascent of the Mount of Olives, and wept as he went up; and all the people that were with, him went up, weeping as they went” (2 Sam. 15: 30). It is a heartbroken Church over Prodigal wanderers. Any frailty or sin in man can never picture Christ, and David’s deplorable indulgence of his wayward son is no part of the type; but the broken King’s overwhelming love and, passion of pardoning grace, is no unworthy shadow of our Lord’s. “Deal gently for my sake,” he cries, “with the young man” (2 Sam. 18: 5). The Greater David hung from the Tree for all the Absaloms of the world, and no period is put to the return of the prodigal son. Abels and Samuels and Timothys, it may even be Isaiahs and Pauls, lie embedded in modern youth, only waiting to spring into shape and form under the chisel of he Gospel. Nor need hope expire except with life.* A Church clergyman named Galbraith, a powerful evangelist in the days of Whitefield, had a son utterly heedless and dissolute, who remained unchanged up to his father’s death. His own life then ran its course in debauchery and sin; but when dying, a friend at his bedside, seeing a lovely light in his face, asked the reason. “I am just thinking,” exclaimed the dying man, “what my father’s face will look like when he seees me entering the Holy City

 

* Of Bathsheba’s child, dying in infancy and so covered by Calvary, David says:- “I will go to him” (2 Sam. 12: 23); but in spite of his frantic grief he says no such word of Absalom, a lost soul on the other side of the gulf. - [See Luke 16: 23, 25-26, R.V.)]

 

 

-------

 

 

In Him we dwell, Beloved,

Then let us rest:

By changes all unmoved,

In Him so blest.

 

 

Nor Heaven’s throne-near host

Can nearer be

Than we, who from the lost

Are saved, are free.

 

 

In Him we dwell, not aught

Can blot this truth:

We, who have been Blood-bought,

Are His Blood-worth.

 

 

So precious in His sight,

And loved, and known;

Come day or cometh night,

We are His own.

 

 

                                                                                              - GILBERT INGRAM.

 

 

-------

 

 

OMNIS VANITAS

 

 

The boast of Heraldry, the pomp of Power,

And all that beauty, all that wealth e’er gave

Await alike the inevitable hour

The paths of glory lead but to the grave.

 

 

Nor you, ye Proud, impute to these the fault,

If Memory o’er their tomb no trophies raise,

Where through the long-drawn aisle and fretted vault

The pealing anthem swells the note of praise.

 

 

Can storied urn or animated bust

Back to its mansion call the fleeting breath?

Can Honour’s voice provoke the silent dust,

Or Flatt’ry soothe the dull cold ear of Death ?

 

 

Perhaps in this neglected spot is laid

Some heart once pregnant with celestial fire;

Hands, that the rod of empire might have swayed,

Or waked to ecstasy the living lyre:

 

 

But knowledge to their eyes her ample page,

Rich with the spoils of time, did ne’er unroll;

Chill Penury repressed their noble rage,

And froze the genial current of the soul.

 

 

Full many a gem, of purest ray serene,

The dark unfathomed caves of ocean bear;

Full many a flower is born to blush unseen,

And waste its sweetness on the desert air.

 

 

Far from the madding crowd’s ignoble strife

Their sober wishes never learned to stray;

Along the cool sequestered vale of life

They kept the noiseless tenor of their way.

 

 

Their names, their years, spelt by th’ unlettered Muse,

The place of Fame and elegy supply;

And many a holy text around she strews,

That teach the rustic moralist to die.

 

 

For who, to dumb forgetfulness a prey,

This pleasing, anxious being e’er resigned,

Left the warm precincts of the cheerful day,

Nor cast one longing, ling’ring look behind?

 

 

On some fond breast the parting soul relies,

Some pious drops the closing eye requires

Ev’n from the tomb the voice of Nature cries,

Ev’n in our ashes live their wonted fires.

 

 

                                                                                                   - GRAY’S ELEGY.

 

 

-------

 

 

HINDUISM AND CHRISTIANITY

 

 

During twenty years of my life in India practically my whole time was spent in direct Christian work among educated Hindus in many parts of India. In a very large number of the long conversations I had with individual Hindus, a Hindu, young or old, poured out the need, sorrow, repentance, anguish or aspiration of his soul and asked for sympathy and Christian advice. A part of my work was thus of the nature of a clinic, and in that my experience gradually reached form and clearness; and the outcome of the whole was the conviction that [author’s italics] in Hinduism there is  nothing that can take the place of the living Saviour who, in lave for man, became man, died for our redemption, but rose again, and now lives to lead us, through repentance and spiritual cleaning, to a new life of devotion, and obedience on Him for all our religious needs.

 

 

                                                                      - J. N. FARQUHAR, M.A., D.Litt.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

45

 

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF

AN ATHEIST STATE

 

 

By PAUL HUTCHINSON, D.D.

 

 

 

Dr. Hutchinson, managing editor of the American Christian Century, in this article in the Christian World tells how he finds Russia fiercely militant, “and unless I have been utterly fooled, deliberately precipitating a European catastrophe.” It is doubtful if an Atheist State on a great scale has ever before been attempted in the history of the world. - Ed. [D.M.P.]

 

 

I have been in Russia, covering the European portion practically from the Baltic to the Caspian. I have tried to find out as much as an outsider can as to what is happening in matters of religion. I had doubted whether there was any large amount of truth in the rumours of religious persecution. My report must be that the rumours are founded on fact. There is religious persecution of the most determined and brutal sort now going on in Russia. And this persecution is increasing in scope and intensity.

 

 

From the beginning Russia’s Communists have opposed religion. That opposition, however, has seemed more or less spasmodic and at times almost passive. There was an apparent guarantee of religious liberty in the original Soviet constitution, and, while this clause was later modified, it had generally been taken for granted that a modus vivendi had been found as between the State and the various forms of Christian worship which flourish in Russia. The present situation makes it clear that this impression has been mistaken. Any accommodation between State and Church has been only temporary. Communism has not surrendered its original intention to stamp religion out. Its programme of religious eradication is now completely developed, and it intends to push that programme to its limit.

 

 

The Soviets began their attack on religion in Russia by proclaiming the atheism of the Communist Party. Since the Communist Party offers the Russian his only chance to take a part in the large concerns of his country, the Soviet rule has meant from the start that the man or woman who wished a career must deny all religious faith.

 

 

Coupled with this atheism of the ruling party has gone a ceaseless attempt to undermine the strength of the old Orthodox Church, and particularly of its priesthood. To be sure, the Orthodox Church stands in a peculiarly exposed position, for the record of its intimate relations with Tsarism is too long to be denied or forgotten. It has been easy for the Communists in their papers, in their speeches, and particularly in their anti-religious museums, to picture the churches as the abode of reaction, and the complete loss of civil rights which has been visited on a priesthood widely accused of social parasitism has had a large measure of public approval.

 

 

The third step in Communism’s programme to destroy religion in Russia has been the imposition of atheism on the rising generation. There was a time when teachers in the Soviet schools were expected to take a neutral attitude on religion. That time is past. For some time now all teaching has been becoming actively anti-religious. To-day every school is required to instruct its pupils that there is no God, and that religion is per se superstition. All the testimony that one gathers indicates that a stridently affirmed atheism now characterizes not only the three or four millions of young Russians that belong to such definite Communistic organizations as the Young Pioneers and the Comsomol, but to at least ninety per cent. of all school children, whatever their social and political background.

 

 

Another important feature of the anti-religious movement has been the success of the Communists in breaking up reform movements within the Orthodox Church. There was a time when it seemed possible that these reform movements, such as led to the formation of the Living Church party, or to the provision of a modern type of theological education for young priests, would succeed in so changing the old Church from within as to make it a vigorous factor in the new Russia. These hopes now seem completely dissipated. By one means and another, the Soviets have either brought the most important of the reform movements to an end or have driven the reformers back into an innocuous type of traditional religious observance. To-day the genuine forward-looking element in Orthodox Church life is so small that it can hardly be said to exist.

 

 

In thus eliminating reform movements within the Orthodox Church, the Soviets have placed that institution in a position where its own eventual mummification will come to pass. For that reason there seems to be little active persecution of old-time churches at present. The authorities are content to allow the priests to go along, chanting their services in a dead language, and acting as despised but tolerated chaplains to the constantly dwindling groups of old people who still attend the services. So long as there is no attempt to introduce any new and vigorous elements into the life of these churches the Communists seem to take it for granted that they will ultimately eliminate themselves.

 

 

With atheism established as the faith of Russia’s ruling party, with the old priesthood deprived of all civil rights, with the rising generation impregnated with unbelief, and with the Orthodox Church manoeuvred into a position of powerlessness, the Soviet programme against religion had reached the stage where it was ready for its fifth and final move. This has come this year with an open and frontal attack on Russia’s Evangelical Christians. Out of this attack has developed the persecution which makes the present situation of Evangelical pastors and worshippers a terribly dangerous one.

 

 

Communism’s drive against the Evangelicals was ushered in last May with the issuing of a decree, published in the Press of the world, which restricted rigidly the work of Evangelical churches and ministers. By the terms of this decree, no minister could preach in more than one church. This brought to a stop the work of the travelling evangelists who had been so successful in arousing religious interest. Neither could a minister or church conduct organized classes for the teaching of religion, even when those classes met within the church building. Neither could they engage in any form of social work. And the young people’s societies, which had been growing at an astonishing rate, were summarily suppressed.

 

 

These regulations would have proved enough in themselves to make further expansion of the Evangelical movement exceedingly difficult, if not impossible. But the Soviet authorities had no intention of stopping with these merely negative acts. They went ahead to close churches. In Moscow, for instance, the number of Evangelical churches or Orthodox churches in which the reform movement has established an evangelical type of worship, has been reduced until there were, I believe, only three left functioning by the middle of August [1929]. The chances are that these three are closed by this time. Five hundred churches were closed last year, before the present storm burst. The figures for this year will, when totalled, run well into the thousands.

 

 

Along with this closing of churches there has gone a closing of schools for the training of ministers. In the case of the Baptist Seminary in Moscow, for example, this took the simple and effective form of imprisoning the entire faculty. And beyond all this, to render impossible any rapid or wide-spread dissemination of Evangelical ideas, the publications of the Evangelical bodies have been either suspended or their circulation reduced to a shadow. Moreover, the censor is refusing to permit the publication of religious books, and is excluding from the columns of such periodicals as are still in existence all material save of the dreariest and most point­less sort.

 

 

Yet even with this the force of the Soviet attack has not spent itself. Although churches and schools are being closed and publications suspended, the authorities are going ahead to rid the country of the men and women who, by their preaching and personal devotion, might keep the flame of a vital religion alight. Ministers and laity alike are being arrested, often on the flimsiest of charges, and exile is being pronounced on hundreds. This persecution is still largely confined to Great Russia, but it is making its way steadily toward the Ukraine, and soon will cover the entire U.S.S.R. It includes within its scope not only Evangelicals, but Orthodox who show the Evangelical spirit, and even Zionists and members of other vigorous religious groups.

 

 

The worst part of the situation is its secrecy. There has been a return to secret police control within Russia in the months since the outburst of the Stalin-Trotsky struggle. The G.P.U. is omnipresent, and apparently clothed with complete power. The former Soviet claim that all trials are public is now abandoned. Men and women are secretly accused, secretly seized, secretly examined, and secretly condemned. The authorities will deny that there is any such persecution under way. With no open trials, a large part of the population seems entirely ignorant of what is going on. And even those who know most intimately what is happening are extremely reluctant to talk. Any indiscreet word reported to the G.P.U. is enough to bring about their own punishment, or that of their relatives. I learned enough, at first-hand, to know that this new terror is no myth; that the reports as to the imprisonment of Evangelicals have been under rather than overstated; that the fate of hundreds and perhaps thousands of these Christians is already shrouded in the mists of prisons and far places of exile.

 

 

In a sense this new persecution can be taken as a Communist tribute to the power of the religion of these Evangelical groups. It has been their success that has brought this avalanche down on them. It is a tremendous experience to come into contact with some of these people who have made their choice and are going quietly on to whatever fate may befall. Many of them approve the social policies of the Soviets to the full. They accept the revolution. Their only serious difference with the Soviet regime is their religious constancy. Even concerning the persecution they do not complain. They take it as something that has come, and that is therefore    to be endured. But they have no doubt that, out of the hardship which this persecution entails, there will finally come a religion in Russia which will prove able to revive spiritually that huge, and now noisily atheistic, land. “Of course the wave will roll over me,” said one with whom I talked. “How soon it will happen I cannot tell. Maybe to-morrow; maybe next month; maybe next year. But it will happen. What of it? The struggle to establish religion here will not be given up. The fire will never be extinguished. No matter what happens to any individual, the cause will persist. And some day the right of a vital faith to live in this land will be acknowledged.” Since he spoke the words he has been sentenced to four years in Siberia.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

46

 

THE BEMA + 2

 

 

By GEORGE GOODMAN

 

 

This is one of a cluster of pithy, lucid, simple statements of Scripture truth such as we should expect from either brother of an honoured name: Great Truths Simply Stated (Pickering and Inglis, 2/6). - Ed. [D.M.P.]

 

 

 

(1) We are justified freely by grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. So complete is that justification that we are said to have died, and “he that died is justified” (Rom. 6: 7, R.V.). No charge can be brought against the dead. (2) The work of Christ on the Cross, which is imputed to us, is so complete that we are said to have been perfected for ever by that one offering. (3) We have received the free gift of eternal life - are born again a new creation. We can never perish. This life was not earned or merited, but gratuitously given.

 

 

Yet it is abundantly clear that we must all appear before the Bema - a word used 12 times in the New Testament, and, with two unimportant exceptions, always translate Judgment Seat. How shall we reconcile this fact with the great verities before named?

 

 

1. It is clear that a distinction must be drawn between the tribunals - the BEMA and the GREAT WHITE THRONE. Before the one “we” (that is, all [regenerate] Christians) must appear and be manifested; before the other, all the world. These two tribunals are probably separated by at least a thousand years. The one is for the justified [by faith]; the other is for the condemned.

 

 

2. We must distinguish between the NATURE OF THE JUDGMENTS taking place at these tribunals. There is a judgment unto condemnation. There is a judgment unto victory. In the one the sinner is condemned. In the other the saint comes through saved - a victory of grace. In some cases with honour, in others saved “so as by fire The statement of John 5: 24 that the [regenerate] believer shall not come into judgment clearly means condemnation. This is confirmed by Romans 8: 1. “There is therefore now no condemnation, etc,” and Romans 8: 34, “Who shall condemn ... etc.” Whatever the ‘Bema’ shall mean, it cannot mean final condemnation.

 

 

3. A distinction of the utmost importance - a distinction of a fearful and tremendous character - little, I fear, grasped or understood, is the 'distinction between forgiveness and the governmental dealings of God. In other words, Forgiveness, Mercy, Justification cover much, but not all the sanctions against sin. Thus forgiveness does not exempt from some forms of judgment. Righteousness must be done though the sinner is spared. Mercy must be extended to the guilty, yet justice must be done to the injured, and God’s holy name vindicated. The Cross allowed God to extend mercy to the guilty on righteous ground, but righteous Government has other demands as well.

 

 

Have we any justification for believing that the solemn message addressed to saints, “Whatever a man soweth, that shall he also reap is limited to this life? Does not character survive the grave? Is the result of careless walk, of forgotten duty, of dishonourable behaviour, all wiped out by death? The whole trend of Scripture teaches the contrary. Is the reward of patient continuance in well-doing, the steady growth in grace, the knowledge and wisdom acquired by the obedience of faith of no avail? Is there no distinction between the man of sterling worth and character, and the wretch saved so as by fire? [Yes.] There is.

 

 

The language used of the Judgment Seat and the Coming of the Lord is very significant in this relation. We are told (1) We shall all be manifested - revealed in our true character there. Everything hidden will be openly shown. The real truth will come out. (2) We shall receive the things done in the body - whether good or bad. (3) We shall give an account of ourselves, and, Christ adds, of every evil and idle word spoken. (4) We may “suffer loss though saved, our works being burnt up. (5) We may be ashamed before Him at His Coming. (6) We may lose our crown. (7) We may have no treasure laid up in Heaven.

 

 

2 Corinthians 5: 10 has the review of our PERSONAL CONDUCT in view. “We must all be made manifest (R.V.) before the Judgment Seat of Christ, that every one may receive the things done in his body, whether it be good or bad.” “Manifest” means appear in our true light. “Receive” is the common word for being paid wages. “In his body” is by means of the body - the body used as an instrument. “Good or bad” makes it quite clear that it is not only rewards but also righteous retribution that is intended. Colossians 3: 25 confirms this:- “He that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong that he hath done, and” -  [in Judgment] - “there no respect of personsI suppose the quarrels and difference among saints will form a large part of the Judgment Seat inquiry. What evils have they wrought, what appalling havoc - yes, what destruction! Tens of thousands - [of enthusiastic believers have lost heart, and] - have fallen under the burden that might have lived and served Christ happily but for the pride, anger, cruelty, and malice of fellow-believers.

 

 

Grace must never be so used as to lose the sense of responsibility. We are responsible to our Lord. He who sits on the Bema is our Divine Lord, Whose perfect love has cast out all fear. Whatever be His Word, His love to us will not change. We can never forget that He redeemed us by His own Blood. We shall welcome His judgments, shall realise their truth and grace, whatever they are. Moreover, none will be present but our fellow saints, with whom we shall spend eternity. This will prevent us falling into a slavish fear of that Day. We can never forget that He has promised we shall be with Him and see His glory and be conformed to His image. Nevertheless, it will be a great loss in that day to know that we have not merited His “Well done, good and faithful servant

 

 

Moreover, we can anticipate the day. “If we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged” (1 Cor. 11: 31). The Apostle Paul, after stating that we must all be manifested before the Bema, says, “But we are made manifest (using the same word) and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences” (2 Cor. 5: 11). Thus by self-judgment and walking in a good conscience he anticipated the Bema, and could even say with confidence later, “Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness which the Lord, the righteous Judge, shall give me at that Day, and not to me only, but unto all them also that have loved His appearing” (epiphaneia): His manifestation. May we be among such!

 

 

-------

 

 

GUIDANCE

 

 

Lead us, O Father, in the paths of peace

Without thy guiding hand we go astray,

And doubts appal, and sorrows still increase

Lead us, through Christ, the true and living way.

 

 

Lead us, O Father, in the paths of truth;

Unhelp’d by Thee, in error’s maze we grope,

While passion stains, and folly dims our youth,

And age comes on uncheer’d by faith and hope.

 

 

Lead us, O Father, in the paths of right;

Blindly we stumble when we walk alone;

Involved in shadows of a darksome night,

Only with Thee we journey safely on.

 

 

Lead us, O Father, to Thy heavenly rest,

However rough and steep the path may be,

Through joy or sorrow, as Thou deemest best,

Until our lives are perfected in Thee.

 

 

                                                                                                - W. H. BURLEIGH.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE PILGRIM WAY

 

 

But once I pass this way,

And then - no more.

But once - and then, the silent Door

Swings on its hinges, -

Opens - closes, -

And no more

I pass this way.

So while I may,

With all my might,

I will essay

Sweet comfort and delight

To all I meet upon the Pilgrim Way.

For no man travels twice

The Great Highway,

That climbs through Darkness up to Light,

Through Night to Day.

 

 

                                                                                                     - JOHN OXENHAM.

 

 

-------

 

 

IF ONLY WE UNDERSTOOD

 

 

Sir John Barnsley tells the following incident. An American train was speeding through the night, and the occupants of one of the sleeping-cars were disturbed by the constant crying of a baby in one of the births. When the sleepless passengers could stand it no longer, a man’s angry voice shouted up the corridor: “Can’t you keep that child quiet? If I were its mother I’d keep it from disturbing everybody.” Then from the birth where the crying came from, a man’s tired voice answered (it was the father of the infant): “I’m sorry, I’m dong my best, but the child’s mother can’t quiet it for she’s in her coffin in the baggage-van at the end of the train.” A few moment’s pause, and the man who had protested was heard walking up the corridor to the bereaved father. “If only I’d understood! I wouldn’t have said what I did for a thousand pounds. You must be worn out. Let me take  the baby and you get some rest.” The child was soon nursed to sleep and quiet was restored.

 

 

                       - The Church of England Newspaper.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

47

 

DYING CHURCHES + 1

 

 

 

No boast of Modernism is more insistent or persistent than the claim, by a more reasonable presentment of the Christian Faith, to fill the churches. Yet as a matter of fact the one thing it is experiencing is emptying pews. “In inquiries extending over many counties,” says the Anglo-Catholic and Modernist, Commonwealth (May, 1929), “we have found that all churches are equally empty: we believe that a most serious crisis is coming in the history of the Church in this land

 

 

No less insistent is the claim of Modernism to multiply candidates for the ministry by making it possible for the youthful mind to believe. The reverse is the fact. “We have got to face the fact,” says the Church of England Newspaper (NOV. 29, 1929), “that the pick of England’s youth - alert in mind and body and educated for leadership - are not to be found in any considerable numbers among the candidates for Holy Orders. The law, medicine, civil service, army and navy, industry and politics seem to claim the best of our young men, while the ministry of the Church is being impoverished. Why is it? The answer to this question, and consequently the cause of the shortage of clergy may be expressed in the one word, uncertainty. This applies first to the attitude of the modern mind towards the dogmas of the Church, and secondly towards the ministry as a possible career.” The candidates turned out do not even know the Book which they are supposed to have revolutionized. “The ignorance of the Scriptures,” says Bishop Burroughs, “displayed by ordination candidates” - produced by the theological colleges all of which are now strongholds of Modernism - “is a commonplace

 

 

The mission field drifts to an identical bankruptcy. “The number of students deciding to devote their lives as missionaries,” says Professor Latourette, in the Yale Review, “has fallen more than half in the past six or seven years. Agreement no longer exists as to what constitutes the missionary’s message. In many circles we are witnessing the passing of religious convictions which some of us still in early middle life can remember as the fruit of the movement led by Moody and his great predecessors. The rapidly growing Protestant liberalism often gives out an uncertain sound - and men and women do not stake their lives in an alien land on an attempt to propagate a question. It is quite the most alarming situation with which missions have had to deal in the century and a quarter since they became important

 

 

Modernists must really settle among themselves what actually is the value of the Bible after they are done with it. The soothing view usually advanced is expressed by the Modern Churchman (April, 1929):- “For Modernism the Bible is born again and is starting on a new, illimitable lifeBut other Modernists think otherwise, and so does the man in the street, who has plenty of shrewd common sense. “The higher-critical view of the Bible,” says Mr. Arnold Stephens (Christian World, Nov. 21, 1929), “as taught (say) in all the Free Church theological colleges sweeps away the whole history of the people of Israel looked at as a series of supernatural events. In the outstanding case of the giving of the Law at Sinai the miraculous is as completely rejected as in the case of the Flood. Then, again, from the moral standpoint we know now that a portion of Biblical history has an origin hardly more creditable than that of the forged Decretals on which so much Papal pretension was founded, and which Protestants speak of with so much scorn. With regard to the New Testament, while modern students differ about the amount of ground which must be yielded to advanced thought, most seem to agree that it must be very considerable. And the end is not yet. We must recognize that we shall in all probability emerge with the authority of the Bible tremendously and in some respects irretrievably shaken

 

 

Modernists themselves are not altogether deaf to the roar of the veiled Niagara. “The views of Fundamentalists,” says Mr. William Paxton, “are anachronisms, and their conception of a future life seems unworthy of barbarians; but they preserve an intense zeal for the advancement of the Kingdom of God, and the only prayer-meetings left in Liverpool worth speaking of are those of the Fundamentalists.” “The destruction of the Bible’s infallibility,” says Dr. W. H. Spence, “has ruined its authority for multitudes. In reaction from the doctrine of literal inspiration the Liberals have thrown over all dependence upon it as a spiritual guide-book. Yet, we are told, when one thinks of what the old faith in the Bible did for our fathers and mothers and the kind of family life it inspired them to create, one feels less and less inclined to swagger over the fruits of the so‑called modern view of the Bible

 

 

Modernist churches are self-doomed. Dr. Stolee, in the Lutheran Church Herald (Dec. 25, 1925) relates how Professor Lyder Brun, of the University of Oslo, himself a Modernist, told a group of students of two visits which he made to Germany. At the first visit most of the pulpits were still orthodox, the churches were filled. On his second visit, twenty year’s later, many pulpits had become liberal - and the churches were all but empty. Dr. Stolee bears this personal testimony:- “A few years ago I spent some time in Strassburg, Alsace. If my memory serves me right, there were twenty-two Protestant churches in the city. Only three of them had orthodox pastors. But they were crowded three times every Sunday, while the liberal churches had only one service with a mere handful of people.” History proves that it is easier to launch churches than to maintain them in ages of darkening doubt. Where is Jerusalem, our Mother Church? Where is Antioch, that sent out the first distinctive foreign missionaries? Where are the Churches of Asia Minor? Where are the North African churches that in the early days of Christianity counted a thousand bishops? A vanished lampstand is a forfeited life.

 

 

And it also means the death of the individual soul. Benjamin Fay Mills, not long before he abandoned the Christian Faith for Unitarianism, wandered into Newell Dwight Hillis’s study in Brooklyn, and dropped the suitcase which he carried upon the floor with a thud which attracted Hillis’s attention. “What have you there, Mills?” asked Hillis. “Books!” was Mills’s laconic response. “What are theyHillis pursued. “Look at them!” Mills answered in the same terse way. They were a collection of works, generally of recent date, having to do with the Higher Criticism. “What are you going to do, with them?” he inquired. “Read them!” said Mills, And then he added:- “The fact is, Hillis, I have been so busy with my evangelism I have had no time to consider these issues of modern Bible scholarship, and I am going to take six months off and read them upThe Divine Christ was dead.

 

 

-------

 

 

GOD

 

 

“This delicately wrought poem, which we have received fron a girl of twenty,

strikes the note modern youth needs.” - Ed. [D. M. P.]

 

 

 

In the dawn and sacred worth

Of the quiet that pervades

Over all His earth,

In the glens and the glades,

Who is there - but GOD?

 

 

In the waking birds that sing,

In their song that resounds,

In the sweetness of its ring

And the dawn’s own sounds,

Who is heard - but GOD?

 

 

In the fragrance of the flower,

In the velvet to behold,

In the presence of its bower

And the beauty of its mould,

Who is seen - but GOD?

 

 

In the murmur of the surf,

In the azure of the sky,

In the greenness of the turf

Where its quiet breathes a sigh,

A sigh for what - but GOD?

 

 

In the shading of the trees,

In the strength of the hills,

Where blue mists, one sees,

And their peace, which stills,

Is all - of GOD.

 

 

In the sunset and its merging

Into shade of wonder hue,

As it meets the twilight verging .

And gives place to it anew,

Comes the hush - of GOD.

 

 

In the grandeur of the night

Torm by wrath of thunder’s roar,

In the heavens lit by light,

That reveals its separate law,

Whose law - but GODS?

 

 

As the sky, and its glow,

Green and foliage of tree,

And all nature lives to show

That the Maker is : - is

He Unrecognized by thee?

 

 

                                                                                                  - HAZEL POTTER.

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

48

 

A DIAGRAM OF THE AGES

 

 

 

It is extraordinarily beautiful and wonderful that the Most High, in the kindergarten of Israel’s ordinances, has

given, with rich distinctness, the ground-plan of the ages ‘Figures of us’ (1 Cor. 10: 6), and ‘shadows of things to come’ (Col. 2: 16), the Feasts are an exquisite cameo, designed as such, of the Church’s path from her re-birth to the Eternal City: - the Sabbath - redemption; Passover - conversion; Unleavened Bread - sanctification; Harvest - resurrection and rapture; Trumpets - war; Day of Atonement - judgment; and Tabernacles - final joy. For the divisions of the Feasts remarkably corroborate this simple and decisive clue. They are divided into three groups: (1) redemption, conversion, and sanctification, a yet uncompleted group which all occur in the first month; (2) resurrection and rapture, a group not yet begun, by itself, after arrival in the land; and then war, judgment, and joy, grouped together in the seventh (or last) month, close all with a rapid rush.

 

 

1 - THE SABBATH - REDEMPTION

 

 

The Sabbath was the foundation of all the festivals, so as to be before all, through all, and after all. The first of the seven feasts was the Sabbath; all through the following feasts, the Sabbath continued, in sabbatic days, sabbatic months, and sabbatic years; and God’s whole scheme of time closes, first with the sabbatic month - the millennial age, and then with the sabbatic jubilee, seven sevens of years - the vast eternity beyond. So that the Sabbath begins all, permeates all, and closes all, because it is the picture of redemption. For before a single soul is saved, redemption is ready; throughout every vicissitude of the Church or the believer, redemption never leaves, never forsakes; and after the last soul has been brought in, redemption remains our foundation for ever. All that preceded our epoch went to produce redemption - creation, conscience, law, incarnation, sacrifice, resurgence from the tomb - all are God’s laborious work ending in the conversion of the human soul.

 

 

For the Sabbath was the first blessing God ever gave to man; for God’s seventh day was man’s first; and God called man at once to share, having done no work himself, in the restful enjoyment of all that He had made. So when our Lord sat down on high, His rest began: the work was over, for everything possible for the salvation of a universe had been done: He then “rested from His works, even as God did [at the creation] from His” (Heb. 4: 10). And exactly the same invitation is once again given to man. Man, with no works of his own, is now invited to share in the Rest of an ended work; as surely as man had no hand, and could have no hand, in the creation of the universe, and yet was invited to share its benefits, exactly so we who have had no hand, and could have had no hand, in the salvation of the universe, are yet invited to share its benefits to the full.

 

 

2. - THE PASSOVER - CONVERSION

 

 

The first essential, after a provided redemption, is the new birth: all things begin afresh from the moment of God’s descent into the individual soul. “In the first month” - although it was the seventh in Israel’s old calendar; for “this shall be the beginning of months to you” (Exod. 12: 2) conversion instantly makes the past obsolete, and starts all life afresh - “at the fourteenth day of the month” - the exact date of Calvary - “is the Lord’s passover” (Lev. 23: 5). The Holy Spirit has made the meaning absolutely sure: “Our passover hath been sacrificed for us, even Christ” (1 Cor. 5: 7): so, from the moment of regenerating faith, when the lintels of the conscience became blood-sprinkled, “I have been crucified with Christ” (Gal. 2: 20): now sheltering for ever behind the Blood, the old life has been blotted out as though it had never existed; it is the birthday of the new calendar. The Church starts on her path home to God. So therefore none unsheltered by the Blood by his own act can escape the Destroying Angel.*

 

* The reader who wishes a fuller exposition of sections 2, 3, and 4, will find them in the author’s (1) Expiation By Blood, (2) The Judgment Seat of Christ, and (3) Rapture.

 

 

3. - UNLEAVENED BREAD - SANCTIFICATION

 

 

The next feast is that in which, antitypically, we are now living. “And on the fifteenth day of the same month” - that is, immediately after crucifixion with Christ on the fourteenth - “is the feast of unleavened bread” (Lev. 23: 6). The Holy Spirit again leaves us in no manner of doubt. “Our passover hath been sacrificed for us, even Christ; wherefore” - since expulsion of all leaven is immediately to follow the sprinkling with blood upon the lintels (Exod. 12: 15) - “let us keep the feast” - a seven-day purgation covering our whole dispensational era - “with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Cor. 5: 8). “It is the sacred festival of a consecrated life, which should follow upon our union to Christ in His death” (Lange). Appropriately, therefore, to this section the Holy Spirit attaches excommunication for leaven retained (1 Cor. 5: 11), and a “cutting off” (Exod. 12: 19) from ‘the Kingdom’ of the believer guilty at the Bema of unexpelled leaven (1 Cor. 6: 9). Sanctification is the process through which we are now supremely passing.

 

 

4. - HARVEST - RESURRECTION AND RAPTURE

 

 

The next feast is not celebrated in the wilderness at all; for it is ascension into heaven. “When ye come into the land, ye shall reap the harvest thereof” (Lev. 23: 10). The seed are ‘the sons of the kingdom’ (Matt. 13: 38, [R.V.]), planted in ever-recurring relays: the Saviour is both Sower (Matt. 13: 7), and Reaper (Rev. 14: 15); so that the wheat is the crop sown between the two Advents; and the harvest is the garnering out of the field - from off the plains, and from out the bowels the earth, in a reaping accomplished after the wilderness journey is over, in successive flights of resurrection and rapture. “The reapers,” our Lord says, “are angels” (Matt. 13: 39). The harvest is exactly and minutely graded. The first Sheaf - which is Christ (1 Cor. 15: 20); or, since a sheaf is a plurality of ears, the group that ascended after the resurrection, including Christ (Matt. 27: 53) - is garnered while the feast of unleavened bread is still going on : then, when “seven sabbaths shall be complete” - the enormous lapse of a whole dispensational era - two first-fruit loaves, leavened, for they are types of rapt saints, not of Christ (Lev. 23: 17); these are followed, two or three weeks later, by the main harvest; and finally the batch is gleaned of unreaped ears in the corners of the field - for even towards the close of the Day of the Lord (Rev. 16: 15) the characteristic Church warning for watchfulness goes forth.*

 

* The type makes it as clear as anything can be that the field, which is the world (Matt. 13: 38), is reaped by a plurality of cuttings, and not by one swing of the scythe. The enormous gap separating the Solitary Sheaf, with which no sin-offering is offered, from the Two Loaves, which are accompanied by sin-offerings, makes the guess that the Loaves are Pentecost manifestly impossible; for in that case the Loaves must have come immediately after Passover - Calvary, and before Leavenless Bread - the Church in her age-long walk of commanded separation. The Lord’s own ruling of the type (Matt. 13: 39) shuts up the reaping to resurrection: the cutting of Firstfruits and Harvest is the same as the cutting of the Lonely Sheaf - ascension off the Field altogether.

 

 

5. - ATONEMENT - JUDGMENT

 

 

Atonement, or ‘covering’, follows; for the Day of Atonement, the awful crisis of the wrath of God, so covers sin finally as “to finish transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness” (Dan. 9: 24). In absolute loneliness the High Priest does it all; he confronts the wrath of God with the covering incense and the blood of the slain goat - Christ lifts Himself between the saved and the wrath of God; while “the temple was filled with the smoke from the glory of God, and from His power; and none was able to enter into the Temple till the seven plagues should be finished” (Rev. 15: 8). It is Christ alone before the tribunal of Deity, sheltering His redeemed in the great day when God rises up to judgment; it is the inrush of the Blood between the saved and the outrush of the Divine wrath. Then follows the dismissal of the sin-laden goat into the wilderness - the living nations (the goats on the left hand), and later, the mustered dead before the Great White Throne, all adjudicated to Hell; and at last the High Priest puts off his sacrificial robes, all sin having been finally dealt with, and comes forth, clothed in his gar ments of beauty and glory, for His millennial and eternal reign.

 

 

6. - TRUMPETS - WAR

 

 

Trumpets muster for war, and open actual battle against a foe; for the trumpet is a war-weapon; and so we read as God’s final judgments fall, “And I saw the seven angels which stand before God; and there were given unto them seven trumpets” (Rev. 8: 2). These trumpet-blasts proclaim war against an earth in conscious rebellion against God: each trumpeting is followed by a judgment: six blasts still hope for repentance; the seventh, covering all the closing disasters, are pure, unadulterated, awful war. And as the peculiarity of the feast of trumpets was that the trumpets were blown all day, from dawn to sunset, so, throughout the Day of the Lord, trumpet-blast follows trumpet-blast till its sun has set. “The great day of the Lord is near: the mighty man crieth there bitterly. That day is a day of wrath, a day the trumpet, and of alarm” (Zeph. 1: 14). God’s appalling thunders break the silence of two thousand years, rouse the world, wake the dead, and usher in the tremendous events that cluster at the end. Finally, ‘the loud trumpet’ ushered in Jubilee (Lev. 25: 9): so “the seventh angel sounded; and the kingdom of the world is become the kingdom of our Lord, and of his Christ” (Rev. 11: 15). That seventh trumpet-blast covers a vast epoch: the last judgments descend; the millennial era - itself wholly judicial - runs its course; the great Judgment takes place before the Great White Throne; and the final jubilee of the ages is ushered in.

 

 

7. - TABERNACLES - JOY

 

 

The Feast of Tabernacles is the final mustering of the whole people of God, first for investigation and reward, and then for eternal bliss. “On the first day shall be a solemn rest holy assembling; “and on the eighth day shall be a solemn rest”: that is, before the millennial age, and again before the eternal state, there will be mustering of God’s people; solemn gatherings, first for millennial, and then for eternal, joy. In the words of Jehovah: “Thou shalt be altogether joyful [literally, ‘Thou shalt only rejoice’]” (Deut. 16: 15). In every sabbatic year the Law was read to all Israel on the first day of Tabernacles, as ushering in a judicial era. “When all Israel is come to appear before the Lord thy God, thou shalt read this Law before all Israel” (Deut. 31: 11); and Ezra (Neh. 8: 18) read the Law throughout the seven days:- for the whole millennial epoch is judicial; but it was not read on the eighth, for eternity is based on grace alone.

 

 

The supreme characteristic of the Feast of Tabernacles - its lavish burnt offerings - reveals a humanity thoroughly redeemed and devoted to God. Its only sin-offering was the single slaughtered goat, daily offered: whereas the burnt offerings were twice as many as on the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and five times as many as during Passover Week: so our devotion in that day will be twice as much as in our utmost sanctification now, for our body will then be redeemed as well as our spirit; and it will be five times as much as in the moment of our conversion, for then “the ordinance of the law, [five is the number of law] will be fulfilied in us” (Rom. 8: 4): and all the sacrifices are a multiple of seven, because it will be the revelation of Calvary perfectly understood and fully appropriated at last.

 

 

So God’s wonderful kindergarten of the Church’s history closes in the folding up of the pilgrim tent and the final entry into the city whose foundations are immovable and eternal. The long pilgrimage is over. Grounded on the Sabbath of redemption, which precedes, interpenetrates, and winds up all; born from above at the touch of the Passover blood; battling for holiness against a thousand forms of leaven an enormous dispensational interlude of seven weeks then divides the first three feasts from the last four - three in the wilderness, four in the land; the first three in the first month, and the last three in the last month: so resurrection and rapture resume God’s work in harvest; war on a rebellious world is ushered in by trumpets; universal judgment blots out sin in the day of covering or atonement; and now, after tent life on earth and in heaven is over, on “the last day, the great day of the Feast” (John 7: 37) - for it is a symbol of eternity - is the final convocation of the redeemed. “On the eighth day shall be a solemn rest The main distinction of this eighth day was the abandonment of the booths, which were broken up, and the return of all the people into solid houses: it is a final passing of the pilgrim life, and the entry into the many mansions in the House of the Father. This eighth day is sometimes regarded as in the Feast, sometimes not: the old calendar, strictly speaking, is over: the morning of the eighth day is the final Sabbath - God’s eternal Rest, never to be broken again by sin. “And His servants shall do Him [liturgical] service [as priests], and they shall see His face; and they shall reign for ever and ever” (Rev. 22: 3).

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

49

 

THE SUFFERINGS OF CHRIST

AND THE PRESENT HOUR

 

 

By T. G. MANLY, B.A.

 

 

 

There is perhaps no greater need at the present day than a more adequate realisation by the Church of Christ of the Sufferings of the Cross. From the Cross all things spring, all atonement for the past, cleansing and power for the present, and hope for the future. Apart from the Precious Blood shed on Calvary, men are indeed lost for ever, left to sin, self and confession, bereft for ever of God’s presence. To state this is to express our realisation of the incalculable benefits our God has purchased for us. But it is only one side of the Cross. It is our side, the glorious forgiveness and blessings we receive. But what of the cost? What did the Cross mean to Christ? What of God’s side? The future will be incomprehensible without the light shed on it by Christ’s sufferings.

 

 

It is the mark of a devoted Christian never willingly to grieve the Holy Spirit, just as on the human plane a loving child would never willingly cause his parent to suffer. We would not sin, not in the first place, because sin is foolish, wasteful and destructive, but because we know that sin hurts God. In other words, the motive for a holy life springs from a loving care to give joy and not pain to God and our Saviour, who reside in us in the person of the Holy Ghost.* So the Christian motive is not spiritual gain and pleasure, but to give joy and glory to God. “Man’s chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy Him for ever.” The glorification comes first. Unless it does, the true enjoyment of God cannot follow. God is always first.

 

[* NOTE the condition: (Acts 5: 32; 1 John 3: 24, R.V.).]

 

 

There is another reason why we should meditate to-day on the sufferings of the Cross. Our hope is to be translated in the near future with the members of His Body (Phil. 3: 20, 21). What if we are not? What if we are not accounted worthy to escape all the things that are coming to pass and to stand before the Son of Man? We shall then be living in a world where sin will abound unrestrained, where the powers of Hell will be loosed upon us, where the natural human heart and sin will be seen in all their unvarnished guilt and horror. God will seem to be almost completely eclipsed and to have forsaken the world, and the faith of - [the regenerate, but ‘left’! (1 Thess 4: 15,ff.)] - believers will be tested as never before by suffering and persecution. So awful will be the reign of sin that God will apparently be defeated. The meaning of the Cross will then be of vital moment and it will be asked - “How can it be true that Christ ‘spoiled principalities and powers’?” “Is it true that Satan really was defeated?” “Why then is he reigning on earth?” “Did Christ on the Cross really plumb the depths of suffering? If He did not triumph over the Devil, if He did not experience what we are passing through now, what hope have we?” Even if we are translated to the throne of God it may well be that we shall be called on to suffer before the glorious change as we have not suffered before; and so in either case it behoves us to realise the meaning of the Cross in terms of suffering and victory - what the Cross meant to Christ.

 

 

Faced by a future of apparent defeat of God, let the will turn to that scene of apparent defeat of the Son of God on Calvary.

 

 

The physical suffering of Christ on the Cross was terrible in the extreme, but it was as nothing to the anguish of His Soul. He did indeed pour out His Soul unto death. When He gave His Blood, He gave His Soul, for the life of the flesh is in the blood (Lev. 17: 11). It was the offering of a Holy Soul on behalf of the stained souls of the human race. Where then did His Soul go? It went out into the engulfing presence of our Sin. What is more Holy, more Beautiful, more Sensitive than the Soul of Jesus? What is more sinful, more ugly, more brutal than Sin? Yet the two had to meet. The tender shrinking soul of the Lord Jesus must be engulfed by sin’s octopus coils. He who knew no sin was made sin. His soul travailed. Those words “travail of Soul” reveal suffering which plumbs the depths. There can be no greater. If travail of body is awful, what of travail of soul? Job said (chap. 7: 15) - “my soul chooseth strangling and death rather than life”, but the soul of Christ was strangled in a way that Job’s never was. “Is it nothing to you all ye that pass by? Behold and see if there be any sorrow like unto my sorrow. ...”

 

 

This then is what sin is in its real self - a meaning we never know, though we are the guilty ones. He who hung on the tree bore the curse of sin for us for ever. “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me Yes, He has gone down to the depths. In the Cross all suffering, all persecution, all defeat find their refuge. Any suffering then that we shall be called upon to bear will be light in comparison, for it will not clutch the soul.

 

 

The Cross was also the Devil’s hour of apparent triumph: “This is your hour and the power of darkness God rules by apparently being ruled and He conquers by going down to - [‘Sheol’ / ‘Hades’ (Acts 2: 31; cf. Matt. 12: 40, R.V.) the place of] - death. That which looked to be a gigantic failure was an eternal victory. Satan did with the ‘soul’ of the Lord Jesus in those three hours of darkness what he willed. It was the purchase money that must be paid him who was the god of this world. But he could find no taint in that Holy Soul, and so he could not retain it. So after he had plunged it into darkness and had levelled his hosts of hell against it, and torn it with all his weapons, he had to withdraw, and his hour of apparent triumph ended in an eternal defeat. The Lamb had prevailed.

 

 

Though the victory of Christ is not yet applied to earth, it will be in God’s own time. His victory is sure and the visible future application certain, while Satan’s near triumph will be but the proof of his defeat on Calvary and his visible defeat on earth [soon] to come, Come then what may, the Cross is a Rock upon which we can stake our all. Though all things are flung into the vortex of the first whirlpool, though the Devil even now seems about to grasp the ruins of world empire and -[will eventually (Rev. 13: 4-8, R.V.] - turn all men to his person, the Cross remains. It cannot change. The Lamb of God triumphs, He has defeated defeat, prevailed over all suffering.

 

 

“The kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers take counsel together

against the Lord and against His Anointed, saying

 

‘Let us break their bands asunder and cast away their cords from us’.

 

He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh; the Lord shall have them in derision.

 

Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath and vex them in his sore displeasure.

 

‘Yet have I sat my king upon my holy hill of Zion’

 

 

*       *       *

 

 

50

 

WHAT WE FIND IN CHRIST + 1

 

 

By Rev. R. L. LACEY

 

 

 

“And they set apart Kedesh in Galilee in the hill country of Naphtali, and Shechem in the hill country of Ephraim, and Kiriath-arba (the same is Hebron) in the hill country of Judah. And beyond the Jordan at Jericho eastward, they assigned Bezer in the wilderness in the plain out of the tribe of Reuben, and Ramoth in Gilead out of the tribe of Gad, and Golan in Bashan out of the tribe of Manasseh- Joshua 20: 7, 8 (R.V.)

 

 

KEDESH - SHECHEM - KIRIATH-ARBA - BEZER - RAMOTH - GOLAN

 

 

Only a string - did you say - of outlandish names! Not since the War! Indeed they are words with wonderful meanings and beautiful messages - albeit promises and prophesies ultimately fulfilled in Christ alone - the Solitary City of Refuge for all Souls.

 

 

What then do these names of the Cities of Refuge mean?

 

 

Kedesh means Sanctuary; Shechem - Strength; Hebron - Fellowship; Bezer - Fidelity, or Firmness’ Ramoth - Elevation, and Golan - Joy.

 

 

And so, translated into the language of our people our verse reads:

 

 

Sanctuary, Strength, Fellowship, Fidelity, Elevation and Joy stood for their Cities of Refuge.

 

 

If only we could persuade people that Christianity stood for precisely these things, how it would help! I am sure it does.

 

 

2

 

 

‘And they set apart Kedesh in Galilee in the hill country of Naphtali

 

 

Kedesh for Sanctuary. Sanctuary is, as you may remember, one of the sweet and sacred words of the Hebrew Scriptures.

 

 

“The Lord answer thee in the day of trouble,

The name of the God of Jacob set thee up on high;

Send thee help from the Sanctuary,

And strengthen thee out of Zion(Ps. 20: 1, 2).

 

 

Used often of the dwelling-place of the Most High, Sanctuary came also to be applied to God Himself. ‘He shall be for a Sanctuary declares Isaiah, and ‘He shall deliver you out of the hand of all your enemies Out of Him the soul of any of us may be slain any day, and our character destroyed. In the exposure, the besetment, the fury, the fire, the riot of hell of the late War, thousands forsook their Sanctuary in Christ, and fell. But this madness had its reaction, and Christ was called as never before to reprieve, and help and hold. God be praised for all who withstood the Gates of Hell.

 

 

Thou wast their Rock, their Fortress, and their Might,

Thou, Lord, their Captain in the well-fought Fight

Thou in the darkness drear their One True Light -

Hallelujah.

 

 

3

 

 

‘And Shechem in the hill country of Ephraim

 

 

Shechem for Strength and Ability. ‘Fear thou not, for I am with thee; be not dismayed, for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of My righteousness,’ says God to each of us by the mouth of Isaiah once more, and Christ is alike the Strength and Righteousness of God. ‘I can do all things through Christ Who strengtheneth me writes the Apostle to the Gentiles, and we can do the same if we trust Christ as Paul did.

 

 

‘Stretch forth thy hand said our Lord to the Paralytic. How absurd! That was the one thing he couldn’t do. And he was asked to do it! ‘Christ named his great incapacity,’ insists Dr. Jowett, ‘and demanded the impossible. For years and years the shrunken, shrivelled thing had hung helplessly at his side, a poor mockery of a hand. Stretch forth thy hand. Impossible! But he did it!’ ‘And his hand was made whole like unto the other ‘I very much like,’ adds the great preacher, ‘an epitaph which is found upon a woman’s grave in New England’ - “She hath done what she couldn’tLong night watchings in nursing the sick; night after night: day after day. ‘You’ll never be able to do itBut she did! Or she made prolonged vigils for God’s children lost on desolate wastes. All this on cold nights, with little fire in the grate. “You’ll break downBut she didn’t! “She hath done what she couldn’t

 

 

Faith laughs at impossibilities, and cries, ‘It shall be doneAbiding in Shechem our weakness is converted into power.

 

 

4

 

 

‘And Kiriath-arba (the same is Hebron) in the hill country of Judah

 

 

Hebron for Fellowship. Happily fellowship with God is possible in many ways if we abide in Christ by faith, not least in prayer.

 

 

“Prayer is the Christian’s vital breath,

The Christian’s native air;

His watchword at the gates of death:

He enters heaven with prayer

 

 

Yet often and often it makes ‘a little heaven here below,’ too.

 

 

‘A little while ago,’ writes an American preacher, ‘I was with a group of preachers as they discussed the perils and problems of the preacher. This man and that suggested this, peril and that, concerning which the preacher needs ever to, be on his guard. When it came to my turn to speak, I made the inquiry, How much do you pray? As we searched our hearts, every man of us felt guilty. We saw that we were busy here and there, finding texts, making sermons, arranging for funerals, for committees, for visits, for interviews, for exacting and endless tasks, but not a man of us had made enough of prayer

 

 

It is not a preacher’s peril only, but a peril common to all. In truth we are all preachers - people in pews and pulpits alike - and our only safety is to abide in Kiriath-arba.

 

 

And now we are leaving the Cities of Refuge in the hill-country of Judea to cross the Jordan.

 

 

5

 

 

‘And beyond the Jordan at Jericho eastward, they assigned Bezer in the wilderness in the plain out of the tribe of Reuben

 

 

Bezer for Fidelity and Firmness. ‘In the plain The level stretches of our every-day life offer fine facilities for fidelity and firmness. Daniel will never be out of date because he abode in Bezer in B.C., as we are called to do in A.D. Mr. Spurgeon says the lions did not eat Daniel because there was so much grit in him. It is not easy to be a Daniel, but if you are in quest of ‘adventurous religion,’ or wish to play the man, try and follow in his footsteps. In a very Churchy little parish in Hampshire (so I heard from a native in those parts) a poor peasant occupied a little cottage of which the landlord was a wealthy but Churchy Squire. One day it came to the Squire’s ears that this old disciple did not worship as-by-law- established in the parish Church, but had worship in his little cottage every Lord’s Day with a few like-minded lowly dissenters. So the Squire visited him, and forbade it. ‘I will not permit it in my cottage,’ he said. ‘It’s not yours while I pay my rent,” replied the poor man, ‘but mine.’ ‘Then I will turn you out’ said the Lion. ‘If you turn me out, you turn the Lord Jesus out,’ said the Lamb, and the Lion left with a roar. A few days later the Squire was astonished to learn that his own butler worshipped with these peculiar people, and the butler was told that he would be dismissed if he went again. Now the butler was without grit, and went no more. But the Squire dismissed him, all the same, because he said he could not trust his butler, but the old Dissenter was never molested. You see, the Lion was chained, and the old man lived on in Bezer to the end of his days, and the legacy of his memory will never be exhausted.

 

 

O! the poor-wealthy of our country, and the wealthy-poor! Without Christ, how poor the richest are: with Christ how rich the poorest.

 

 

6

 

 

‘And Ramoth in Gilead out of the tribe of Gad

 

 

Ramoth for Elevation. When the Outlook is dark, try the UPLOOK. Only as we abide in Christ are we able to learn to think God’s thoughts after Him, and ‘as a man thinketh in his heart, so is he

 

 

“I say the acknowledgment of God in Christ,

Accepted by the reason, solves for thee

All questions in the earth and out of it.”

 

 

So only do our thoughts about our Father in heaven, and the world in which we live, and the world - [‘Age’ the better translation!] - which is to come, and countless perplexities, become clarified.

 

 

7

 

 

‘And Golan in Bashan out of the tribe of Manasseh

 

 

Golan for Completeness and joy. ‘And your joy no man taketh from you’ under any circumstances if you abide in Christ.

 

 

In this most attractive and strongly fortified City, death itself loses its terrors for John Bunyan, and he cries, ‘Let me die!’ ‘Now was I got on high’; he writes, ‘I saw myself safe in the arms of grace and mercy: and though I was before afraid to think of a dying hour, yet now I cried, Let me die! Now death was downright lovely and beautiful in my eyes; for now I saw that we shall never live indeed till we be translated to the other world. All this time I saw more in these words HEIRS OF GOD than ever I shall be able to express while I live in this world. HEIRS OF GOD! God Himself the portion of His. saints! This I saw, and wondered at, but cannot tell you the half of what I saw

 

 

8

 

 

In the plenitude of God’s Mercy the Cities of Refuge were provided for the MANSLAYER.

 

 

OUR SINS SLEW OUR SAVIOUR. YET

 

 

“At the Cross, AT THE CROSS I first saw the Light!

And the burden of my heart rolled away;

It was THERE by faith I received my sight,

And now I am happy all the day.”

 

 

Why? Because SLAIN - BY and FOR our sins - the Lamb of God offered THERE the one, true, pure, immortal and acceptable Sacrifice in God’s eyes whereby our sins are cleansed.

 

 

-------

 

 

ONCE FOR ALL

 

 

It is a solemn fact darkening a horizon already dark enough that the Greek Church, and not the Roman only, worships the Elements with ‘latria’ - that is, with the worship appropriated solely to God; thus erecting an impassable barrier to communion. If the Bread and Wine are a sacrifice, and the identical sacrifice that was offered on Calvary, it is unescapable that the same worship is due to the Elements as was due to the hanging Saviour. But no error is more impossible of reconciliation with the Scriptures than a perpetual sacrifice; for the key-word of the inspired exposition of Calvary rings in a lonely and constantly repeated ‘once for all in the entrancing and unquenchable chimes of heaven (Rom. 6: 10; Heb. 7: 27; 9: 12, 26, 28; 10: 10, 22; 1 Pet. 3: 18, in the Greek). “There is an exceeding grandeur - approaching to awe - about everything which can be done only once. This is a great part of the grandeur of death and of the judgment, in their nature, that they can be only once. And the Atonement is the more grand because it is of the same character. The Cross is magnificently fearful in its perfect isolation. Everything in religious truth, which went before it in ages past, looked on to it. Everything in religious truth which has ever followed, and in ages yet to come, looks back to it. It is the bud of all, the beginning of all, the sum of all” (Dean Vaughan).

 

 

THE END