ONE DAY

 

 

One day they led Him Up Calvary’s mountain,

One day they nailed Him To die on the tree;

Suffering anguish, despised and rejected:

Bearing our sins, my Redeemer is HE!

 

 

One day the grave could conceal Him no longer,

One day the stone rolled away from the door;

Then He arose, over death He had conquered;

Now ascended, my Lord evermore!

 

 

     - Wilbur Chapman.

 

 

“But forget not this one thing, beloved, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.  The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some count slackness; but is longsuffering to you-ward, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance:” (2 Pet. 3: 8, 9, R.V.).

 

 

-------

 

 

THE IMPORTANCE OF

STUDYING PROPHECY

 

 

[1] In relation to God.  Christians should be interested in prophecy because of what God is.  Either the world is out of God’s control and His plan is nothing more than a patchwork quilt or He is absolutely sovereign and has a purpose and plan which He is carrying out (Isa. 46: 11).  Parts of that plan which have been fulfilled serve to demonstrate that He is the Truth, and thus that faith in prophecy is faith in God and His plan.

 

 

[2] In Relation to the Scriptures.  Fulfilled prophecy is one of the strongest proofs of the truth and accuracy of the Scriptures.  That the prophecies which have been fulfilled [at the Messiah’s First Advent] would have been fulfilled by chance is outside the realm of probability.  In addition, there is no escaping the responsibility of knowing and expounding the prophetic Scriptures since the servant of the Lord is appointed to declare ‘the whole connsel of God’ (Acts 20: 27).  Sixteen books in the Old Testament and one-twentieth of the New Testament are prophetic, and one certainly cannot neglect such a large portion of the Word of God.  Surely it is not God’s purpose that any of His Word should be slighted’ it must not be ours.

 

 

[3] In relation to the believer.  The study of prophecy will do a number of things for the believer.  (1) It will keep him from false doctrines and false hopes.  (2) It will help to make the unseen real and create within the believer’s life the very atmosphere of heaven. One cannot do other than worship in reading the Revelation, for instance.  (3) It will give joy in the midst of tribulation and affliction (2 Cor. 4: 17).  (4) It will increase one’s loyalty to Christ and produce true, self-sacrificing service for Him.  (5) When the believer fully realizes all the glory that is hid future, it makes him satisfied to be nothing now.  (6) Prophetic truth is the only thing which can give true comfort in the time of sorrow and bereavement (1 Thess. 4: 13-14).  (7) All Scripture is profitable and prophecy is no exception for it will produce and encourage holy living (1 John 3: 3).

 

 

May the Holy Spirit forbid anyone who looks at these pages to be a hearer only of the prophetic Word, and boy He increase in each the love of the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

 

 

      - Charles C. Ryrie, (The Basis of the Premillennial Faith, pp. 15, 16).

 

 

-------

 

 

And we are witnesses in Him of these things; and God gave the HOLY SPIRIT to those who SUBMIT to him: (Acts 5: 32, lit. Gr.).

 

 

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

151

 

POSSIBLE CROWNS

 

 

BY PAUL W. ROOD*

 

* President of the World’s Christian Fundamentals Association.

 

 

-------

 

 

For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?  And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear? (1 Pet. 4: 17-18).

 

 

 

WHAT shall the end be?  What a solemn question!  It concerns each of us.  All of us are going to be judged. Acts 17: 31 - “Because he hath appointed a day, in which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead Christ is going to be the judge.  Hebrews 9: 27 - “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment  There is no escape from the judgment of God.  Men may possibly escape the consequences of their sins in this life, but no one is going to be able to escape the consequences of sin in eternity.  Every infidel, every atheist, every agnostic, everyone who rejects the Lord Jesus Christ, is going to have to face the judgment of God.

 

 

There are two judgments mentioned in the Bible, just as there are two resurrections.  There is the Resurrection of Life and the Resurrection of Damnation.  There is a judgment for the believer at the judgment Seat of Christ, and a judgment for the unbeliever at the Great White Throne.  John 5: 28-29 - “Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation  The Resurrection of Life will take place when Christ returns, when the dead in Christ shall be raised and the living changed in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, and together shall be caught up to meet the Lord in the air.  Then we shall stand at the Judgment Seat of Christ.  What will the end be as far as the Christian is concerned?  2 Corinthians 5: 10 - “For we must appear before the judgment seat of Christ  (The reference here is to believers.)  Every Christian must appear before the judgment Seat of Christ, “that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad

 

 

1 Corinthians 4: 5 - “Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God  Some are going to receive praise of God when we stand at the judgment Seat of Christ.  Humble souls who never received much praise here on earth, who never were written up in the press, whom the world knows nothing about, folk who serve the Lord conscientiously and faithfully and loyally in the hidden places - the hidden-away saints - are going to be rewarded.  We are going to be judged according to our motives.  Every man’s works shall be made manifest.  Our works are going to be tested by fire when Christ returns.  If we build with gold, silver and precious stones, then our works will stand the test of fire and we will be rewarded.  If we build with wood, hay and stubble, then our works will be destroyed by fire and we will lose our reward.  What does this all mean?  What is gold?  What is silver?  What is precious stone?  Gold refers to God the Father; silver to redemption and Christ the Son; and precious stones to the Holy Spirit.  If we preach, sing, work, pray and live in the energy of the Holy Ghost to the glory of God and the exaltation of Christ, then our works are gold, silver and precious stones, and they will stand the test of fire and we will be rewarded.  If, on the other hand, our works are results of motives that are mixed - if we are selfish and if we are not living and working for the glory of God and the exaltation of Christ - if we are preaching, singing and working in the energy of the flesh - then our works are wood, hay and stubble.  Wood is dead trees; hay is dead grass; stubble is dead wheat.  Many works are dead works even if they are not wicked works.  It is the motive that determines the value of what you do.

 

 

Some are going to be saved by fire, and some are going to have an abundant entrance into the kingdom.  It is God’s plan that you shall have an abundant entrance.  Your life here on earth determines what will happen at the Judgment Seat of Christ.  Do not lose out spiritually!  There are spiritual Christians and there are carnal Christians.  Carnal Christians are the ones that build with wood, hay and stubble.  Spiritual Christians are the ones who build with gold, silver and precious stones.  Revelation 22: 12 - “Behold, I come quickly, and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be

 

 

Five crowns are mentioned in the New Testament.  First of all, there is the Crown of Life.  Revelation 2: 10 - “Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of tou to prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life  That means that we should be faithful even to the point of martyrdom; even if it means that we have to sacrifice our lives.  If we are faithful to the point of martyrdom, then we shall receive the Crown of Life.  James 1: 12 - “Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him  do you have the martyr’s spirit?  Do you love the Lord supremely?  Then you will receive the Crown of Life.

 

 

The Incorruptible Crown is described in 1 Corinthians 9: 24-27 - “Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize?  So run, that ye may obtain.  And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things.  Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.  I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: but I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway  We face the danger of being disapproved, of being a castaway!  How important it is for us to be temperate!  How important it is for us to concentrate: “This one thing I do”!  How important it is for us to put God first and to seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness!

 

 

The Crown of Glory is described in 1 Peter 5: 4 - “And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away This crown is for shepherds; for Sunday school teachers; for those who are concerned about the sheep and the lambs; for those who minister on the radio, in the Sunday school, in the church and in the home; for mothers and fathers who have the shepherd heart.

 

 

The Crown of Rejoicing is mentioned in 1 Thessalonians 2: 10 - “For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing?  Are not even ye in the presence of the Lord Jesus Christ at his coming  This is the soul-winner’s crown.  Daniel 12: 3 - “And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever  Are you going to receive the soul-winner’s crown when you stand at the Judgment Seat of Christ?  Are you witnessing for the Lord?  Are you seeking to win the lost?

 

 

We read about the Crown of Righteousness in 2 Timothy 4: 8 - “Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing  Do you love the appearing of Christ?  Are you glad that Jesus is coming back again?  Do you rejoice in the blessed hope?  Then you are going to receive the Crown of Righteousness because that crown is for all who love the appearing of Christ.

 

 

Revelation 4: 10 - “The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne  We are going to cast our crowns at the feet of Jesus when we stand in His presence in glory. Revelation 3: 11 - “Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown  There is a danger of losing your crown.

 

 

Five crowns are intended for you if you are a child of God.  You may lose one of them, or two of them, or three of them, or four of them.  Oh, the tragedy of it!  You may even lose all five of them!  You and I ought to be candidates for all five of these crowns.

 

 

Remember that your house in eternity is built with the material that you have sent up from earth in the form of sacrifice, in the form of gifts - yes, in the form of service.  This is the most heart-searching truth that I know anything about: that every believer is going to stand at last in the presence of the Lord and render an account of his stewardship.  What an incentive for us to serve the Lord faithfully!  Oh, the surprises when we stand at the judgment Seat of Christ!  The saints of the Lord who served faithfully and conscientiously are going to be vindicated in that hour.  Those who have been criticized and misunderstood here on earth are going to receive praise from the Lord.  Don’t lose your crown; do not lose your reward!

 

- The Christian Fundamentalist.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

152

 

WORLD EMPIRES

 

 

BY D.M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

JEHOVAH has given, through Daniel, a snapshot - a vivid miniature photograph - of the history of the world. But first of all we need to note two main, outstanding facts.  The first fact is that God, in whose hand alone is the power of the world, moulds and controls the destinies of all nations.  “He made of one [one blood or stock] every nation of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed seasons” - the rise and decay of empires - “and the bounds of their habitation” (Acts 17: 26) - their geographical and racial limits.  A nation, in God’s hand, blooms, or wilts and falls, like a flower.  “God is always on the side of the big battalions,” was the cynical remark of Napoleon: that saying is true, in this measure, that it is God who makes the battalions big, and can wither them at a touch.  World-power God gives into the hands He chooses.

 

 

Israel’s Empire

 

 

The second fact is that God gave the first great empire - not over the whole world, but the main power in the world at the time - to the Jew.  God said to Solomon:- “I will give thee riches, and wealth, and honour, such as none of the kings have had that have been before thee, neither shall there any after thee have the like”: so King Solomon, exceeded all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom” (2 Chron. 1: 12; 9: 22).*

 

* But we are not aware of any Scripture which states that Israel, if faithful to Jehovah, would have been given the Empire of the World.

 

 

Gentile Empires

 

 

Now this kingdom the Jew forfeited; and in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (Dan. 2: 31) we get the great crisis of God handing over world-power from Jew to Gentile.  The Jew, because of sin, was a captive in Babylon; the royalty of Israel perished there; and God now presents a vision of the succession of empires as seen sheer down the ages for four thousand years.  What is the Vision?  A colossal Image of awful brightness - for it is the glory of the world - and of terrifying power - for it is the raw strength of the world - rises before the sleeping King.  A head of gold, a breast of silver, thighs of brass, legs of iron - a huge figure of colossal power: then, as the King gazes, a stone sharply falls upon the feet of the image, and smashes it into dust, which the winds sweep away; and then the Stone expands into a Mountain, and the Mountain at last fills the whole earth.  The value of the vision is obvious.  It is an explicit prophecy, which can be checked as true or false by history since, that there should be four great empires, and four only, in the history of the world: three out of the four are named in the vision; and the fifth is to be God’s Kingdom upon earth.  Seeing forward as only God can, it is such a clear prediction of world-history for three thousand years, that it constitutes a direct challenge, irrefragable, of the truth of the Word of God.

 

 

The Head of Gold

 

 

First, a Head of Gold:- “Thou, O King Nebuchadnezzar, art the head of gold  Babylon was the first great world-empire of the Gentiles.  How slow Israel was to realize its loss is seen by the fact that the Rabbis have all refused to understand these words as addressed to Nebuchadnezzar, and persistently refer them to God; whereas a child can see that they are addressed to Nebuchadnezzar - “Thou, O king, art king of kings” - or, as we express it, Emperor - “unto whom God has given the kingdom: thou art the head of gold God’s title, on the other hand, in these prophecies - and in the Babylonian inscriptions - is “King of heaven,” “King of Elohim or Angels,” “God of gods”: while in Babylonian and Persian inscriptions the Emperor is always described, and rightly, as “King of kings  Why gold?  It is well to bear in mind that perfect power in the hands of perfect goodness is perfect government: God gave to Nebuchadnezzar the purest and most absolute form of monarchy the world has ever seen.  “All the peoples, nations, and languages trembled and feared before him: whom he would he slew, and whom he would he kept alive” (Dan. 5: 19).  God started the Gentile powers with a perfect opportunity of sinless rule.  “Unto whom the God of heaven hath given the kingdom, the power” - literally, power like that of a mighty oak - “and the strength” - the kind of might which is almost irresistible - “and the glory” - the glory of priceless riches and possessions.  Babylon was the Head of Gold.

 

 

The Breast of Silver

 

 

Secondly, the Breast and Arms of Silver: “after thee shall arise another kingdom  We know this to be the Persian Empire.  “In that night,” we read a little later, “was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain, and Darius the Median received the kingdom” (Dan. 5: 30); or, as the parallel vision has it - “The ram which thou sawest having two horns, are the kings of Media and Persia” (Dan. 8: 20).  A most subtle fact springs out of the Hebrew word for ‘breast,’ for scholars tell us it is a beast’s breast, not a man’s.  These Gentile powers have the heart of a wild beast: so, when Daniel has a vision of these successive empires, he sees, not metals, but wild beasts.  Nebuchadnezzar sees the power only: Daniel sees the wickedness that wields the power.  Two Arms but one Breast; the one Empire of the Medes and Persians: of silver, not gold; for it was a monarchy not absolute, but checked and hampered by aristocracy.  This is vividly shown in the impotence of Darius to deliver Daniel from the Persian satraps and governors.  “Then the king was sore displeased, and set his heart on Daniel to deliver him; and he laboured until the going down of the sun to rescue him” (Dan. 6: 14) - and failed.  The Silver Empire, the Medo-Persian Kingdom, was inferior to the Babylonian in antiquity, in power, and in wealth.

 

 

The Thighs of Brass

 

 

Thirdly, Belly and Thighs of Brass: A “third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth  Here we have proof that de jure, though not de facto, these were world empires, “which shall bear rule over ALL THE EARTH  The parallel vision again puts us here on sure ground.  “The rough he-goat the King of Greece  Brass is the smashing metal, the hardest of metals: after the Persian Empire came the Grecian, which rose by conquest alone.  Alexander, who made this Empire, wept because there were no more worlds to conquer: a most striking comment on the prophetic words - “It shall bear rule over all the earth  But brass is inferior to silver and gold: Alexander’s conquests, at his death, split up into the hands of his generals - the power was checked and tempered by military captains.  The gold - absolute monarchy; the silver - monarchy tempered by aristocracy; the brass - monarchy made and unmade by the Army: each opportunity of sinless rule became less, as God became less and less able to trust the monarchies of the world.

 

 

Legs of Iron

 

 

Fourthly, Legs of Iron: “The fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron This kingdom is not named in Daniel; but it is historically certain which it is, because it was to be a kingdom inheriting the dominions of the first three.  One empire did so, and one only: the Roman Empire.  Its crushing power is extraordinarily emphasized. “As iron breaketh in pieces” - by beating or crushing - “and subdueth” - literally, hammers or beats out thin like tin - “all things: and as iron that crusheth all these, shall it break in pieces and crush  Rome marvellously fulfilled it.  By 266 B.C. she had crushed all Italy; by 202 B.C. Spain had been conquered; by 146 B.C. Carthage (and therefore Africa) had fallen: Asia and Egypt fell to her by B.C. 30: Western Europe followed a little later: and by our Lord’s day, or a little after, she had consolidated the whole into an Empire of enormous strength.  But it was iron, a humbler metal than brass or silver: the Roman Emperors rose, sometimes from the lowest ranks; but, when risen, they swayed a sceptre of iron.  And, as the Mede and Persian were two arms, so the Roman Empire was predicted as ending in two Legs.  The accuracy of the prophecy is extraordinary.  From 800 A.D. to the fall of Constantinople in A.D. 1450 - that is, for 6 to 700 years - there were two Emperors reigning at once; and this was strikingly shown in the Imperial Eagle, which was a single eagle with two heads, one looking East and the other looking West.

 

 

Iron and Clay

 

 

But now notice a remarkable change in the last stage of the figure: Iron and Clay.  Power passes from the Head to the Feet.  The Legs were of Iron alone; the Feet are Iron - strength; mingled with Clay - brittleness: “the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly brittle” - that is, easily broken.  It is startling to observe that one of the earliest commentators, writing while the Legs were still iron only, foresaw the true meaning.  “These events,” says Hippolytus, “are in the future, when the Ten Toes of the Image will have turned out to be so many democracies  Almost every kingdom of the world is at this moment convulsed with this internal conflict, Fascism and Communism: we are living in the last age of the great Image.  “Whereas thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay” - or earthenware - “they” - that is, the iron rulers - “shall mingle themselves with the seed of men” - the word signifies the ‘people’ ; but the result is foretold - “they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron doth not mingle with clay  It ends in constant friction and unceasing revolution.

 

 

A Stone

 

 

So, then, for three thousand years the world-power - the crown of the world - was to pass down these successive Gentile Empires, and so it did.  But lo, high over this colossal figure hovers an impending Rock - a STONE that waxes into a Mountain, and fills the whole earth: “the God of heaven shall set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed  Stone, in Babylonia, was rare; every temple and palace was built of it; it survived, as metal did not, the wear and flux of time, and so presented to the Babylonian a symbol of indestructibility: it is sometimes also - for a diamond is a stone - more precious even than gold.  God at last resumes the power of the world.  “The kingdom of the world” - the world-empire - “shall become the kingdom” - the empire - “of our Lord, and of His Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever” (Rev. 11: 15).

 

 

Finally, in a lovely and convincing picture, the manner of the Second Coming, and establishment of the Kingdom, follows.  It cannot refer to our Lord’s first coming because that occurred when the Legs were still iron only, and before the twofold division.  It is a Stone “cut without hands,” “out of the mountain”: a Stone quarried out of an earthly mountain, but quarried by no human hands.  This combination occurs in one Man only.  “Behold I lay” - God quarried the Stone - “in Zion” - the Kingdom returns to the Jew, and the Stone is a Jew - “for a foundation a stone, a tried stone” - tried by the First Advent - “a precious corner stone of sure foundation” (Is. 28: 16).  The Stone is the Throne of David,* in Zion: “thou shalt call His name Jesus: He shall be great; and the Lord God shall give unto Him the throne of his father David; and**of His Kingdom there shall be no end” (Luke 1: 31): the Mountain, into which it grows, is the world-wide Kingdom of God. “Thou art my son, and I will give thee the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession” (Ps. 2: 7).

 

[*NOTE: The ‘Stone’ is a reference to ‘Jesus Christ of Nazareth’ - the ‘crucified,’ ‘rejected’ - ‘whom God raised out of dead ones.’ See Acts 4: 10, lit. Gk.

 

**The word “and” is a disjunction in this context.  It separates our Lord’s millennial kingdom from His everlasting kingdom in “a new heaven and new earth: FOR THE FIRST HEAVEN AND THE FIRST EARTH ARE PASSED AWAY; AND THE SEA IS NO MORE” (Rev. 21: 1, R.V.).]

 

 

Collision

 

 

So it is a smashing collision: “it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms  The Stone, smiting it on the Feet, collapses the whole Image, which, “like the chaff of the threshing-floors then vanishes in dust: exactly as we have seen in our own day, the two most powerful men in the world - Hitler a suicide, and Mussolini hung by a mob.  God gives opportunity of righteous government to all mankind: from absolute monarchy down to modern democracy, all proves unrighteous, and therefore passes away like chaff.  The gradual conversion of the kingdoms of the world by the Gospel was declared a falsehood three thousand years ago:  Christ will come with smashing power on throned iniquity and democratic unrighteousness: for it is all Christless.  “He that falleth on this stone” - the individual who rejects Christ - “shall be broken to pieces: but on whomsoever it shall fall” - the rejecting nations - “it shall scatter him as dust” (Matt. 21: 44).  The last stage has arrived: the last opportunities are passing: the last glory of earthly kingdoms we are beholding today.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

153

 

THE JUDGMENT OF BELIEVERS

 

 

BY G. H. PEMBER, M.A.

 

 

 

THE Millennial Age will be a time, not only of reward for those who will have overcome by the Blood of the Lamb, but also of chastisement for such believers as will be found to have failed in their walk - through indolence, or the minding of earthly things - and will, consequently, be sentenced to remain in abodes of the dead until the Last Day.  For it will then appear, that, through their lack of earnestness and prayer for the Spirit’s help, their sanctification was not perfected during their earth-life; and it must be so before they can dwell for ever with the Lord.  They did evil in the body as well as good, and did not judge themselves and repent with bitter crying before the Lord: therefore, they must be judged by Him, and even as they did, so must they also receive.

 

 

Hence the Judgment-seat of Christ will dispense temporary chastisement for trespasses, as well as rewards. This is plainly indicated in the verses under our consideration, as well as in other striking passages of the First Gospel, which, as we study them in due course, will increase our knowledge of a solemn but disliked and much neglected truth.  We shall, moreover, find it revealed, with equal clearness, in other parts of the New Testament.

 

 

For instance, what does Paul mean in the subjoined passage?  In speaking exclusively of those who have accepted the only true foundation, he tells its, that it is possible to build upon it either with gold, silver and costly stones, or with wood, hay and stubble, and then continues:-

 

 

“Each man’s work shall be made manifest: for the Day shall declare it, because it is revealed in fire; and the fire itself shall prove each man’s work of what sort it is.  If any man’s work shall abide which he built thereon, he shall receive a reward.  If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss but he himself shall be saved; yet so as through fire” (1 Cor. 3: 13).

 

 

And again:-

 

 

“Wherefore, also, we make it our aim, whether at home or absent, to be well-pleasing unto Him.  For we must all be made manifest before the Judgment-seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he hath done, whether it be good or bad.  Knowing, therefore, the fear of the Lord, we persuade men, but to God we have been made manifest; and I hope that we have been made manifest also in your consciences” (2 Cor. 5: 9).

 

 

And was not the sentiment expressed in the last verse, the fear of the Lord’s terrible judgment of His Own House, powerfully affecting the Apostle when he wrote:-

 

 

“The Lord grant mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus: for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain; but, when he was in Rome, he sought me diligently, and found me - The Lord grant unto him to find mercy of the Lord at That Day - and in how many things he ministered at Ephesus, thou knowest very wcl1

 

 

Surely, if Paul was moved to interpose this fervent ejaculatory prayer on behalf of one who was not only called, but had also shown himself faithful by fearlessly ministering to the Lord’s servant while he was fighting with wild beasts at Ephesus, and, subsequently, at Rome, when he was in the clutches of the most unscrupulous and cruel of persecuting tyrants - surely, if the Apostle was impelled to pray for such a one, that the Lord would grant him mercy in the Day of his Judgment, there can be no believer who is not in need of the same mercy.

 

 

Hence the decisions issued from the Judgment-seat of Christ will have the following results:- Those servants of the Lord who shall be found to have been faithful will be judged worthy of the First Resurrection, and will immediately be made Priests of God and of His Christ, and will reign with Him for a Thousand Years.  They will thus enjoy the great Sabbath that remains for the people of God, and will themselves rest from their works, even as He did from His.

 

 

But the unfaithful servants will be banished into the darkness without the pale of the Kingdom, where they will be detained, and dealt with according to the sentence of the Lord, until the Last Day.  Then, when the time of reward has passed by, He will raise them up to everlasting life, even as He has promised to do in the case of all who have believed on Him.

 

 

*       *       *       *      *       *       *

 

 

154

 

TWO KINDS OF GROUND

 

 

Two Kinds of Ground; that which Receiveth Blessing from God,

and that which is Rejected.

 

 

 

“FOR the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God; but that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing, whose end is to be burned” (Heb. 6: 7, 8).

 

 

The contrast between ground that produces herbage fit for the use of those by whom it is tilled, and ground that brings forth thorns and briers, is apparently given as an illustration of the two ages we have been discussing, namely, the present evil age, which is like the ground that bears thorns and briers, and the age to come, upon which the frequent rain of Heaven, the blessing of God, descends, and which brings forth fruit to those who till it.

 

 

The present age is “rejected being nigh unto a curse.  The end of the things it produces is “to be burned” (literally “for burning”).  The coming age, on the other hand, receives blessing from God.  The mountains of Zion are in the habitable earth to come; and it is there that God commandeth “the blessing which descends like the dew of Hermon (Psa. 133: 3).  This illustration, therefore, furnishes another reason why we should studiously withdraw our affections from the world, and the things that are in the world, and should set them upon the things that are above, where Christ is sitting at the Right Hand of God, waiting until He shall appear “in glory” (Col. 3: 1-4).

 

 

This is entirely a Divine view and estimation of the present age and its things.  That this age is “nigh to a curseand that the boasted products of its scientific civilization are “thorns and briers whose end is “for burning is a fact which few Christians believe, and fewer still act upon.  Yet this is a fact which the Word of God sets forth with unusual fulness and clearness.  “The Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire” (2 Thess. 1: 7, 8).  “The harvest is the end of the age; and the reapers are the ,angels.  As, therefore, the tares are gathered and burned in the fire, so shall it be AT THE END OF THIS AGE” (Matt. 13: 40).  “Whose fan is in His Hand, and He will thoroughly purge His floor, and gather His wheat into the garner, but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire” (Matt. 3: 12).

 

 

In view of these clear warnings of what will surely take place “at the end of this age it is sad indeed to see the time, energies, and money of Christians expended in raising a crop of thorns and briers to feed the flames of that day, when the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is. For the fire-test will be applied to the works of those who are on the true Foundation, as it is written: “For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.  Now if any man build upon THIS FOUNDATION, gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; every man’s work shall be made manifest of what sort it is.  If any man’s work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall RECEIVE A REWARD.  If any man’s work SHALL BE BURNED, he shall SUFFER LOSS: but he himself shall be saved, yet so as by (through) fire” (1 Cor. 3: 11-15).

 

 

The case of Lot illustrates this Scripture.  Being a “righteous” man, he was identified, we may be sure, with all the commendable enterprises set on foot for the betterment of Sodom and its citizens.  But whatever works he builded, they were all consumed in the flames of judgment; and he himself was saved only as through fire.

 

 

It should not be overlooked that Lot was given a special warning and opportunity to get clear of Sodom.  That warning and opportunity came when he was taken prisoner with the people of Sodom, and was rescued by Abraham.  On their return, they were met by the King of Sodom, and also by Melchisedec, the King of Salem (Gen. 14: 17, 18).  Then it was that Abraham refused to accept even a gift from the King of Sodom.  Lot must have witnessed the incident, and must have understood the testimony of Abraham.  Nevertheless, Lot parted company with Abraham, and returned to Sodom, perhaps deceiving himself with the thought of the many opportunities for “doing good” existing there; and the next reference to him states that “Lot sat in the gate of Sodom” (19: 1), that is to say, occupied an official post or honour and authority in the city.

 

 

So Lot stands as a type of the christian who takes part in the affairs of the world [as a politician in], and attains distinction therein, but whose works are thorns and briers.  Abraham, on the other hand, represents the ground that receives blessing from God; for it is written that Melchisedec “BLESSED him and said, BLESSED be Abram of the Most High God, possessor of Heaven and earth” (Gen. 14: 20).  The circumstance that Melchisedec “blessed” Abraham is recited in Heb. 7: 1.

 

 

The bringing forth by the earth of thorns and briers, is not a normal thing.  It is wholly abnormal, being the result or the curse which Adam, by his sin, brought upon the ground.  Indeed, it is the thing which specially bears witness to the fact that a curse rests upon the ground.  Therefore, we are confronted at this point with truth that is fundamental, truth that lies at the very bottom of the evil state of human society.  When God set the earth in order for the occupation of mankind, He said, “Let the earth BRING FORTH grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind  And God, after creating the man, put him in the garden to dress it and keep it.  Thus, so long as creation was in its normal state, the earth brought forth herbs, meet for them by whom it was dressed.  But when, by Adam, “sin entered the world” (Rom. 5: 12), God cursed the ground for his sake, and said, “Thorns also and thistles shall it BRING FORTH unto thee” (Gen. 3: 17, 18).

 

 

The fact, therefore, that the ground brings forth thorns and briers is a testimony that the man who dresses it is still under the dominion of sin and death.  “Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth UNTO THEE that is, unto Adam, the natural man, now indwelt by sin.  So long as the earth is possessed and occupied by the race of Adam, the natural man, it will bring forth thorns and briers.  But when, in ‘the age to come’, “creation shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the liberty of the GLORY of the children of God” - [for] those [at ‘the first resurrection’] “born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God” - then it will no longer bring forth thorns and briers, but will yield herbs meet for those by whom it is dressed.

 

 

The production of thorns and briers is, therefore, the characteristic of the natural man, and of this present [evil] age.  Hence, when the Second Man, the Lord out of Heaven, came in the Body of His Flesh prepared for Him, wherein He offered Himself a Sacrifice for SIN, He was crowned with THORNS, signifying that He Himself bore the curse.  Having borne the curse, He is qualified to deliver the purchased possession from the effects of the curse.  In the age to come He will wear, not the crown of thorns, but the “many crowns” which show Him to be “the Blessed and only Potentate, the KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Rev. 19: 12, 16; 1 Tim. 6: 15).  Therefore, the choice now offered to the saints of God is between the age in which their Lord and Saviour was crowned with thorns, and that in which He will wear the many diadems.

 

 

The land of Canaan - the ‘rest’ and ‘the inheritance’ (Deut. 12: 9) promised by the Lord to the Israelites - is put before us as a type of the rest of God to come.  God said of that land, “But the land, whither ye go to possess it, is a land of hills and valleys and DRINKETH WATER of the RAIN of HEAVEN” (Deut. 11: 11).  Thus it corresponds to the ground described in Hebrews 6: 7, “which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it  It also represents the kind which “receiveth blessing from God for the passage in Deuteronomy continues: “A land which the Lord thy God careth for.  The Eyes of the Lord thy God are always upon it, from the beginning of the year, even unto the end of the year” (Dent. 11: 12).  The promise of rain as symbolising blessing from God is also given in Deut. 32: 2: “My doctrine shall drop as the rain, My speech shall distil as the dew, as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as showers upon the grass Also in Deut. 33: 28: “Israel then shall dwell in safety alone: the fountain of Jacob shall be upon a land of corn and wine; also His heavens shall drop down dew

 

 

The song of the vineyard in Isaiah 5. shows that, even under the best possible conditions, the natural man cannot bring forth fruit that is meet for God.  Israel was a vineyard which the Lord Himself had planted, and which He tended.  “For the vineyard of the Lord of Hosts, is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah, His pleasant plant” (ver. 7).  He chose for the site of His vineyard “a very fruitful hill, and He fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a wine press therein: and He looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes” (ver. 2).  There was nothing more that He could have done for Israel; for He asks, “What could have been done more to My vineyard, that I have not done in it(ver. 4).  After showing them His mighty works in delivering them out of Egypt; after driving out their enemies from the Promised Land and planting them therein; after giving them the law, and the covenants, and the priesthood, and the sacrifices, and the promises; after sending His prophets, “rising up early and sending them to call them from their evil ways, what was there more that He could have done to His vineyard?  We may take as a concise explanation of this parable the brief statement found in Heb. 7: 19, “For the law made nothing perfect literally, brought nothing to full-growth; or that in Rom. 8: 3, 4, “For what the law COULD NOT DO, in that it was WEAK THROUGH (because of) THE FLESH, God, sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh, (in order) that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who walk, not after the flesh, but after the Spirit

 

 

The reason for the failure of Israel, even under the holy law of God, to produce the fruits of righteousness, is the condition of “the flesh  It was because of the hopeless corruption of human nature that the Lord of the vineyard “looked for judgment, but behold, oppression; for righteousness, but behold a cry” (Isa. 5: 7).

 

 

Therefore, the Lord pronounced judgment, saying, “And now, go to; I will tell you what I will do to My vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down: And I will lay it waste: it shall not be pruned nor digged: but there shall come up BRIERS and THORNS; I will also command the clouds that they RAIN NO RAIN UPON IT” (ver. 5, 6).  This passage connects the song of the vineyard with the sixth of Hebrews.  Moreover, the Lord Himself applied the song of the vineyard in Matt. 21: 33-45.  That Scripture contains the parable of the vineyard, and the Lord, in uttering that parable, uses almost the identical words of Isaiah 5. in describing the vineyard.  The parable shows that the Lord’s judgment on His vineyard was put into execution only after God had sent unto them His Son, saying, “They will reverence My Son”; but the husbandmen, when they saw Him, said, “This is the Heir; come, let us kill Him, and seize on His inheritance  And the parable also shows that the [Messiah’s] “inheritance” is “the Kingdom of God”; for the Lord said, “Therefore say I unto you, The Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation BRINGING FORTH THE FRUITS THEREOF

 

 

So Israel became, and still remains, as ground that is rejected, that is nigh to a curse, bringing forth thorns and briers, whose end is to be burned.  The hedge has been broken down, and the children of Israel have been scattered among the nations of the earth, to take part in their unprofitable doings.

 

 

But deliverance from the curse is promised to them through the Son of God, coming to His vineyard, and submitting Himself to the wicked will of the husbandmen, and being Himself made a curse.  In Isaiah 53., He is described as the Lamb brought to the slaughter, wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities, and pouring out His Soul unto death.  Then in Isaiah 55., is described the deliverance accomplished and through the Cross of the Redeemer, when “the mountains and the hills shall break forth ... into singing, and all the trees of the field shall clap their hands.  Instead of THE THORN shall come up the fir tree, and instead of THE BRIER shall come up the myrtle tree; and it shall be to the Lord for a name, and for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off” (ver. 12, 13).  That will be also a time of the rain coming down, as indicated by verse 10: “As the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater  This speaks of a land that receives blessing from God, drinking in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth, in place of thorns and briers, herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

155

 

OUT-RESURRECTION FROM

AMONG THE DEAD

 

 

BY D.M. PANTON

 

 

 

AN exceedingly remarkable example of a single resurrection, consisting of selected saints alone, has already occurred.* “And the tombs were opened, and many of the bodies of the saints that had fallen asleep” - not all - “were raised; and coming forth out of the tombs they entered into the holy city and appeared unto many” (Matt. 27: 52).

 

[* NOTE: There is nothing in the text above to suggest that this resurrection was into immortality: or that these souls, who appeared “unto many,” did not return to “Hades” and their bodies to the grave!  God had previously allowed a similar event to happen in the account of Saul’s request to the ‘woman’ at En-dor!  “Bring me up Samuel … and Saul perceived that it was Samuel … and Samuel said to Saul, Why hast thou disquieted me, to being me upSam. 28: 11, 14, 15, R.V.  Cf. John 3: 13; Luke 16: 29, 30; Acts 2: 27, 34; 2 Tim. 2: 18, R.V.]

 

 

It is exactly such a resurrection of selected saints, yet to come, of which Paul stresses the emphasis of his whole soul.  All that once valued he says he cast overboard as so much dead cargo:- “I do count them but dung”; and why? “if by any means” - if possible (Meyer); if anyhow (Eadie) - “I may attain” - the word ‘attain’ here means to arrive at the end of a journey - “unto THE OUT-RESURRECTION, OUT FROM AMONG THE DEAD” (Phil. 3: 11) ; that is, not the resurrection of the dead, but a resurrection out from the dead, leaving the rest sleeping in their graves.  That Paul is speaking of bodily resurrection is clear from the closing verse of this chapter:- “We wait for a Saviour who shall fashion anew the body of our humiliation, that it may be conformed to the body of His glory As Professor T. Croskery puts it:- “It is not a part in the general resurrection; it is not spiritual resurrection, for that was already past (in the experience of the Apostle): it is a part of the resurrection of the just, the resurrection of life  It must be the First Resurrection, for only that resurrection leaves dead still in the tombs; “the rest of the dead lived not until the thousand years were finished” (Rev. 20: 5); and so it is the First Resurrection which here rises before Paul as the mighty goal of a mighty effort.

 

 

Never was Paul so anxious to impress uncertainty on the Church as he is here, touching the first resurrection: he piles phrase on phrase implying extreme difficulty of achievement.  “Not that I have already obtained” - that is, attained to the standard qualifying for the prize - the word means to win a prize (as in 1 Cor. 9: 24): “but forgetting the things which are behind” - the failures, the disappointments, the follies - “I press on” - toward the maturity required for the reaping sickle of the First Resurrection: “or am already made perfect” - I am in hot pursuit - “if so be that I may apprehend that for which also I was apprehended by Christ Jesus.  Brethren, I count not myself yet to have apprehended  It is a statement crammed with deliberate uncertainty: “‘if by any means’ is used when an end is proposed, but failure is presumed to be possible” (Alford).  “The Apostle states not a positive assurance, but a modest hope” (Lightfoot).  So high was Paul’s inspired conception of the standard required by God, that most of all in the Apostolic Church he disowned all self-confidence, though more abundant in labours, in sufferings, in confessions than they all; for the clearer our spiritual vision, the more sharply distinct is the distance of the goal.  Let us ponder Bishop Lightfoot’s paraphrase:- “Be not mistaken.  I hold the language of hope, not of assurance.  I have not reached the goal: I am not yet made perfect.  But I press forward in the race, eager to grasp the prize, for as much as Christ also has grasped me.  My brothers, let other men count their security.  Such is not my language.  I do not consider that I have the prize already in my grasp.  This, and this only, is my rule.  Forgetting the landmarks already passed, and straining every nerve and muscle in the onward race, I press forward ever towards the goal that I may win the prize  Paul is now in prison; and the nearer he is to martyrdom, the keener is his pursuit of the prize: and the closer to it, for all martyrs are crowned (Rev. 20: 4).

 

 

Now the Apostle reveals the profound yet simple truth explaining the uncertainty: - namely, the out-resurrection is not a gift in grace, but a prize to be won by devotion and sanctity.  Nothing could be clearer than the Apostle’s words.  First, the renunciation - “I count all things but dung”: next, the aim - “if by any means I may attain unto the select resurrection from among the dead”: finally, the reason - “I press on toward the goal for THE PRIZE of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus  Morally and practically, a gift and a prize are worlds asunder: if a gift has to be won, it is not a gift, but a prize; and if a prize is received without effort, it is not a prize, but a gift.  Here is the solution of the whole problem, and of words of Paul which have puzzled thousands.  Unlike simple salvation, the select resurrection is a prize, not a gift: “I press on for the prize”, he says.  For obtaining simple salvation Paul has just stated that all works he had jettisoned for ever overboard, for God’s salvation is a pure gift - the righteousness of Another given out of hand; but so from this truth producing carelessness in Paul, or the conviction that works after faith are of little account either for time or for eternity, by a counter-truth Paul’s master-passion now is to attain to the Select Resurrection as the prize.  I press on to seize the prize, to attain which Christ seized me: it is Christ’s wish that I should win the prize: it is ‘our heavenward calling’” (Lightfoot), for God is invoking us all so to run that we shall break up with the first through the shattered tombs.  A prize is never won except at the goal: the runner who, at any point of the track, calculates that he has out-distanced all competitors; or gets out of the running tracks; or lingers to look back in satisfaction at the ground covered; or runs with anything but intense concentration - loses the race.  “Seest thou says Chrysostom, “that even here they crown the most honoured of the athletes, not on the race-course below, but the king calls them up and crowns them there  “I press on cries Paul, “toward the prize of our high calling” - the heavenward, upward, Godward call - “in Christ Jesus

 

 

Paul finally presents us with a priceless cluster of truths that shine out like stars.  First, our resolve: “Let us therefore, as many as be perfect (full-grown, mature) be thus minded  That is of Paul’s mind: not doubting or denying that there is such a prize; not foolishly scorning the doctrine of reward; not despairing of ourselves, or ruling ourselves out as competitors; not absorbed in discussion as to who shall win the prize, or wondering how near, or how far, we are ourselves; not reposing on past victories, or resting on past laurels, or crushed and hopeless over past failures; but making the supreme effort of our lives to attain.  “There is a difference between the perfect and the perfected; the perfect are ready for the race; the perfected are close upon the prize” (Bengel).  All the mightiest of mankind have been men of one idea, for concentration is the secret of power , and they are the mightiest saints who have no less an aim than a perfected holiness, the top-stone of which is a bursting upward from the tomb.

 

 

Now follows a golden promise.  “And if in anything” - in any detail of this truth - “ye are otherwise minded” - if you think that the prize is for all believers without effort, or that there is no prize, or that the first resurrection is not the prize, or that it is not worth a life’s devotion, or that you have, by effort, already secured it - “even this” - always assuming a single eye for God’s truth - “shall God reveal unto you”: “the verb indicates an immediate disclosing to the human spirit by the Spirit of God” (Lange).  To differ from Paul is, of course, to confess oneself in error: nevertheless, Paul says, walk with me so far as you can see your path; where you fail to agree with me, or with one another, ask God. “Paul teaches, but God enlightens” (Chrysostom).  This meets the inevitable challenge, foreseen by Paul all down the ages:- ‘Paul, your doctrine of the Prize will plunge the Church into chaos, and sharply sunder the babes from the adult’.  This is the answer.  Seek the best you know, and God will give you a still better best: be perfect in devotion, and a passionate runner, and God is pledged to show us what is “the hope of your calling” (Eph. 4: 4).  Seek God about it, and “even this” - the most golden ideal that ever hovered before human vision - “shall God reveal unto you: only whereunto we have already attained, by that same rule let us walk  For Paul himself the crowning fact remains:- “This ONE THING I do” it remains the master-passion of my life.

 

 

-------

 

 

Overcomers

 

 

It is tragic how many evangelicals abhor responsibility truth.  A striking example has just been given (Life of Faith, Dec. 15, 1948) by Dr. Basil Atkinson.  He says, commenting on the fruit promised to the overcomer (Rev. 2: 7):-

 

 

“The idea has sometimes been mooted that an overcomer is a special kind of Christian.  This is not so.  The New Testament knows of no special kind of Christian, though we all know people who believe that such cliques exist today, yet only if they suppose themselves to belong to them!  An overcomer is another name for a believer.  He will be freely given the fruit of the tree - that is to say, he will enjoy the gift of everlasting life

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

156

 

THE 1,000 YEAR KINGDOM

IN GOD’S PLAN

 

 

BY THOMAS W FINLAY

 

 

 

Kingdom (basileia, Greek) means primarily God’s authority or rule, but its usage includes not only the sovereign rule of God but also the people and realm over which He rules.

 

 

God’s Kingdom runs throughout all eternity, but it takes on different characteristics in successive stages or phases throughout the course of time and eternity. “Thy kingdom is a kingdom of all ages, and thy dominion is throughout all generations (Ps. 145: 13, Darby)

 

 

The present stage of God’s Kingdom has a spiritual realization among today’s believers who have had God’s word and life sown into their hearts (Mk. 4: 3-20), and who have been transferred into the Kingdom of His beloved Son (Col. 1: 13) and enjoy the Kingdom of God in the Holy Spirit (Rom. 14: 17).

 

 

Two future phases of God’s Kingdom are yet to come. The next phase will be the millennial Kingdom of Christ, which He will establish upon His return (Lk. 19: 11-12, 15; Acts 1: 6-11; Rev. 11: 15).  This next phase will last 1,000 years and Christ will openly reign on the earth from His throne in Jerusalem (Matt. 19: 28; 25: 31; Is. 2: 1-3; 24: 23; Mic. 4: 6-8: Rev. 20: 4-6).  At the end of Christ’s 1,000 year reign, there will be a final rebellion of some of mankind and Satan, which God will judge (Rev. 20: 7-10). Then Christ, at this point, will deliver the Kingdom to God the Father, bringing in the final, eternal phase of God’s Kingdom, which is realized in the new heavens, the new earth, and the New Jerusalem (1 Cor. 15: 24-26; Rev. 21: 1-2).

 

 

The millennial Kingdom (1,000 years) has more prophetic Scripture devoted to it than does any other prophetic topic.  We must see its importance in God’s plan, including His plan for believers.  Below are some of the names and meaning of this phase of God’s Kingdom:

 

* The Sabbath rest. (Heb. 4: 9). This rest is foreshadowed by God’s rest on the 7th day after His creative activity (Gen. 2: 2; Heb. 4: 4).  This rest follows God’s redemptive activity.

 

* The age to come. (Matt. 12: 32; Mk. 10: 30; Heb. 6: 5). This will be the next age, brought in by Jesus’ second coming (Matt. 13: 39-40; 43).

 

* The regeneration. (Matt. 19: 28) Also called the “the times of restoration” (Acts 3: 21) as a fulfilment of prophecy (Is. 11: 1-10; 65: 18-25). This title indicates that this period is a time when the earth is released from its bondage to corruption (Rom. 8: 20-21).

 

* The 1,000 year reign of Christ. (Rev. 20: 3-6). Popularly termed “the Millennium”.  Christ will rule over the earth from His throne in Jerusalem during this period (Matt. 19: 28; 25: 31; Is. 24: 23; Mic. 4: 7; Zech. 8: 3). He will rule with a “rod of iron” to keep all evil in check (Rev. 2: 27; 19: 15).

 

* The Kingdom (in certain verses). (Matt. 5: 20; 7: 21; 16: 28; 19: 23-24; 22: 2; Lk. 9: 62; 13: 28-30; 18: 24-25, 29; 19: 12, 15; 22: 29, 30; Acts 14: 22; 1 Cor. 6: 9-10; 15: 50; Gal. 5: 21; Eph. 5: 5; 1 Thess. 2: 12; 2 Thess. 1: 5; 2 Tim. 4: 1, 18; Jas. 2: 5; 2 Pet. 1: 10-11; Rev. 12: 10).

 

 

Blessings upon the earth during the 1,000 year Kingdom: The lifting of the curse.  The curse brought in by Adam’s sin is lifted to a great degree in the coming Kingdom age.  The creation is released from its bondage to corruption (Rom. 8: 21; Is. 11: 6-9; 35: 1; 55: 13).  Satan will be bound (Rev. 20: 1-3).  He will not be able to tempt and destroy.  Health for the redeemed (Is. 33: 24; 35: 5-6).  Christ’s earthly healing ministry foreshadowed the Kingdom condition (Matt. 8: 16-17; Heb. 6: 5).  Peace (Is. 2: 4).  Righteousness and justice (Is. 11: 4; 32: 1).  Joy (Is. 14: 7; 51: 11).  Comfort (Is. 49:13).  Truth will prevail (Jer. 33: 6; Zech. 8: 3). Material prosperity (Jer. 31: 12).  Holiness (Is. 11: 9).  Fullness of the Holy Spirit (Is. 44: 3).  Other blessings will also exist.  The remnant of the Jews converted at the end of this present age, and certain Gentiles will become subjects in this Kingdom (Ps. 2: 7-9; Zech. 12: 9-10; Rom. 11: 26-27; Matt. 19: 27-28; 25: 32-34).

 

 

Significance of the millennial Kingdom.  Since this coming age seems to the natural mind to be only a brief prelude to eternity, with somewhat similar conditions, we, may make the mistake of downplaying its importance.  However, since God has paid so much attention to this coming age in His Word, it seems to have great significance in His overall plan.  We can only suggest some reasons why God has placed such importance upon this coming age:

 

 

* The Messiah’s Kingdom.  Firstly, this Kingdom is the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ, where He openly rules over all the earth. Here, He is at last manifested as the true and worthy Sovereign. His roles as Prophet, Priest and King are fully seen. His full supernatural power, His righteousness and His full authority are displayed. Many names of the Messiah will find their fulfilment in this age. Some of these names are: the Branch, the Lord of Hosts, the Rod of Jesse, the King, the Judge, the Lawgiver, the Redeemer, the Shepherd, the Stone, the Teacher, the Son of Man.  In God’s plan, this age will be used to uniquely display the glory of the Jesus Christ.

 

* Many promises to God’s people Israel will be fulfilled. God is faithful to His promises and covenants with His chosen people the tribes of Israel. Thus, the Abrahamic covenant, the Davidic covenant, the Palestinian covenant, and the New covenant all find fulfilment in this era.

 

* This Kingdom Age will be a display of God’s triumph over the damage done to the earthly sphere by Satan and the fall of man. God’s authority and God’s wisdom in creation were challenged by Satan and Adam and Eve. Yet, this Kingdom age brings about the “times of restoration” (Acts 3: 21) showing God’s triumph over evil.

 

* In the “age to come” God’s plan for man is realized and displayed through Christ and the overcomers, who are Christ’s joint-heirs (Rom. 8: 17; Heb. 1: 9; 3: 14).  God’s purpose for man in creation was for man to be in His image and for man to exercise dominion for God (Gen. 1: 26).  Adam lost the right to rule through disobedience and the earth was usurped by Satan.  God’s plan is finally realized in the Millennium (Heb. 2: 5-9; Rev. 2: 26-27; 3: 21; 20: 4-6).  The overcomers are those faithful believers who overcome the obstacles of this life to faith and obedience. The overcomers are pictured by Joshua and Caleb, who were the only adult men who fully followed the Lord in the exodus generation.  They were rewarded with entry into the good land (a picture of the Kingdom reward).  The overcomers are also pictured by the overcomers of each of the seven churches of Rev. 2 and 3.  The various rewards to these overcomers portray some aspect of the Kingdom reward.  In this age (in our lifetimes) God is seeking to prepare believers to be fit to reign in the next age.  Those who learn self-denial and obedience now will be prepared to reign then and also be priests to God (Lk. 19: 16-17; Rom. 8: 17b, 2 Tim. 2: 12a; Rev. 20: 6).  The reward to the overcomer also includes a magnified enjoyment of Christ as eternal life, which is in accord with man’s design of being created in the image of God (Lk. 18: 30; Jn. 17: 3; Rev. 2: 7, 17; 3: 4, 12).  Although it is clear that the overcomers share in Christ’s rule over peoples on the earth (Matt. 19: 28; Lk. 19: 11-19; 2 Tim. 2: 12; Rev. 2: 26-27; 3: 21; 5: 10), they also seem to have some share in the New Jerusalem above the earth during this time (Rev. 3: 12; 21: 2).

 

* A final test and opportunity for sinful man.  Children born to adults who enter the Kingdom will have sinful natures. Such persons will have opportunity for salvation.  Yet, even under the ideal conditions of Christ’s reign, many people will finally rebel against God at the end of the Millennium when Satan is loosed, proving fallen man’s wickedness (Rev. 20: 7-10).

 

* The era of reward. Scripture seems to place the focus on rewards for believers during this period (Matt. 19: 28; Lk. 18: 29-30; 1 Cor. 1: 8-10; Gal. 5: 19-21; Eph. 5: 3-7; Rev. 2: 26-27).  All saints reign in eternity (Rev. 22: 33).

 

 

The Kingdom prize (reward) is the goal of the Christian race and is given by God as a great incentive for us to run with endurance (1 Cor. 9: 24-27; Heb. 10: 35-36; 11: 24-26).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

157

 

GLORY OR SHAME

 

 

BY W. F. ROADHOUSE

 

 

“The book from which these extracts are taken is a remarkable proof that sections of the Church of Christ are slowly waking to the immense importance of responsibility truth. We appreciate it for covering, with exceptional completeness, the numberless truths that involve the believer in anything between incredible glory and the gravest possible penalty short of eternal destruction - all depending solely on his conduct in discipleship.” - D. M. PANTON.

 

-------

 

 

 

THE Bema has been said, for a generation or longer, to be but for the adjudication of Rewards. The usage cited, out of the eleven times the word is employed, indicates otherwise - and for us, New Testament usage determines its meaning.  For example, Pilate sat on the Bema - did he “reward” Christ, or condemn him? (Matt. 27: 19; John 19: 13).  Herod sat upon a Bema, trying both criminals and good men (Acts 12: 21). Gallio heard accusations against the Apostle Paul (Acts 18: 12, 16, 17, used twice).  Festus “sat on the Bema” which Paul said was also “Caesar’s Bema” (Acts 25: 4-19, used twice).  This Bema (translated “Judgment seat”) is to dispense not only happy rewardings but also the opposite.  The word itself means - a step, or foot-room; then a platform, or raised place; then it became the word for tribune, or place where judgment was administered. It is used but twice in its ordinary, secular way (as in Acts 7: 5), “not so much as to set his foot on  Thus we have what the New Testament itself yields and settles for us its meaning.  By this we stand.

 

 

Paul is ‘stretching forward’ to what (Phil. 3: 11)?  “IF BY ANY MEANS” he may “attain unto the out-resurrection (exanastasis, Gr., found only here in the New Testament) from the dead  This expression, “if by any means” (ei pos, Gr.) is used five times in the New Testament, always with the possibility of failure in it and once positive failure (Paul’s shipwreck).  Just this uncertainty is what the expression means.  And assuredly his figure, that follows this, clearly indicates the same, namely, “Stretching forward (the intense Greek runner) to the things which are before, I press on toward the goal unto THE PRIZE of the upward calling of God in Christ Jesus  This is precisely his picture in 1 Cor. 9: 24-27 where Paul says, “Know ye not that they which run in a race run ALL, but ONE receiveth the prize  This is the prize of “the crown which too many, altogether too many [regenerate Christians], will not receive!  “IF BY ANY MEANS” is absolute uncertainty.  And the winner of “the prize” must be ever “on the stretch” like the self-disciplined athlete of both ancient and modern times.  Ever seeking to “lay hold of” that for which he had been “laid hold of” by Christ Jesus.  There is no other life than this glorious intense one, if we would share in this “PRIZE OF THE UPWARD CALLING OF GOD IN CHRIST JESUS  There will be non-successful runners aplenty.  “One receiveth the prize.  Even so run that ye may obtain  The Lord help us all!

 

 

Hear the Divine pronouncement - 1 Cor. 6: 9, 10, “the unjust, of God the kingdom of God shall not inherit ... Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor ... nor ... nor ... shall inherit the kingdom of GodIn passing, note chapter 5: 1-5, the incestuous one that aroused the Apostle’s holy indignation.  This [regenerate] member of the Corinthian church was “judged” by Paul, was then excluded by the assembly (would to God this needed function was carried out to-day by the churches, some of whom are a stench in their community); this resulted in Satan’s chastisement of God’s child, bringing him to a sense of his deep sinfulness; in 2 Corinthians he is restored to his fellow-believers (2: 1-9); and thus “the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus  Galatians 5: 19-21 further confirms this truth - “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these: fornication, uncleanness ... of which I forewarn you, even as I did forewarn you (how often for us?), that they who practise such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God

 

 

Christ refers to what the Lord bestows upon His “servants” of these days.  He “gave ten pounds” to each of “ten servants” to trade with.  Returning from the far country, “having received the kingdom,” he now requires an accounting of their stewardship.  One had “gained by trading” double his bestowment; another had secured half that increase.  To both he gave his commendation, “Well done  But the third had merely hid his entrusted gift, leaving it idle (even chiding his lord for hardness); him the master (note it well) strips of all ministry, designating him a “wicked servant  He got no share, in what is assumed here, in his coming kingdom-rule.  The others are rewarded by authority over ten, or five cities.  Note that they were ALL bondslaves (doulos, Gr.) bought and owned by their master - the third class here, “the citizens outsiders, were not his stewards, and were slain because they refused his right “to reign over them  How perfectly all this fits into the whole plan of Divinely - bestowed stewardship.  This ever-recurring going to Rome to be invested there with the Imperial authority to rule a Roman province with its vivid incidents so familiar to the Palestinians, Jesus used to picture His disciples’ ministering for Him in His absence until His crowning day had come, and then the time of bestowal of rulership - rewards in His glorious reign.  Hence the necessary adjudication at His Bema (as that of the Roman governors) of the awards for days ahead.  We shall be excluded from all reigning with Him because we left our “gift” only unused!  “Behold I come quickly: hold fast that which thou hast, that no man take thy crown” (Rev. 3: 11).

 

 

In Matt. 25: 1-13 the Lord teaches again the possibility of failure to those who, professing to “watch”, carelessly get into an unprepared condition.  Purity of life - “virgins” and the Spirit’s fullness - “the oil” - axe the essentials for preparedness here.  Let those deny who will what a simple concordance study will show any seeker (Lev. 8: 10-12; 21: 12; 1 Sam. 10: 1, 6; Rev. 14: 1-5), that “the oil” is ever emblematic of the Holy Ghost - both of these groups of five had the lamps and “the oil  ALL were “virginsALL had “oil  ALL waited “to go forth to meet the Bridegroom  The “wise” while waiting professedly, “slumbered and slept but were safe-guarded by “the oil” in their lamps - the “foolish” were not ready, for they cry, “Our lamps are going out  Not that they were never lit.  They were alight before.  Manifestly their testimony had ebbed until it faded out - and now the Bridegroom was at hand!  With “going out” lamps it was too late to be “ready” and none was there to help.  How true to experience - from the first days of this century many are to-day sadly failing; once full of joy of the Spirit’s fullness they are to-day outwardly dead and fruitless.  They could truly say “Our lamps are going out  We believe many “prophecy students” have lapsed in holy living, in sacrifice, in giving, in prayer life, and what not.  And they will be amongst those for whom “the door was shut  For when “the Bridegroom came ... they that were ready went in with Him to the wedding feast  And the foolish shouted, “Lord, Lord open to us  But he answered and said, “Verily I say unto you, I know (oida, Gr.) you not  This last phrase presents no difficulty, for this is not salvation truth, but refers strictly to the subject of SHARING IN “THE KINGDOM” JOYS.  It is absolutely different from the case of the false “teachers” of Matt. 7: 21-23 - deluded ones to whom Jesus says, “I never knew (egnon, Gr.) you: depart from Me, ye workers of lawlessness  In Matt. 25: 1 the “virgins” are prospective, potential members of the reigning personnel of the kingdom-reign.  No error nor departure from God’s truth is in sight - they fail because of unguarded and ill-prepared watchfulness, and thus are the sorrowful subjects of an exclusion judgment when the Lord returns.  “Watch therefore Christ concludes.  And He never says this to the unsaved “world” - why should He?

 

 

Far too greatly have we been taught that if but “once in grace” without further obedience, or loyalty, or keen following of the “way of the cross,” entitles us to literally everything that God has for His people.  It is our conviction that so has this been stressed that it lies at the back of the backslidden, “dry rot” condition of the church - even within the ranks of much-professing Fundamentalism to-day.  Potentially, of course, literally all is ours - it is not actually, possessively so, until “by faith” and deep renunciation we “begin to possess” our inheritance.  No longer any folding of hands, no longer any easy-living, fully-indulging our pampered selves - but living after the pattern of the devoted followers of Christ in other days.  No other kind or degree of Christian life will see us through to God’s highest and best.

 

 

“NOW UNTO HIM THAT IS ABLE TO KEEP US FROM FALLING, AND TO PRESENT US FALTLESS BEFORE THE PRESENCE OF HIS GLORY WITH EXCEEDING JOY; TO THE ONLY WISE GOD OUR SAVIOUR, BE GLORY AND MAJESTY, DOMINION AND POWER, BOTH NOW AND EVER!

 

 

-------

 

 

A. T. Pierson, D.D. - “The greatest of all the revelations about the future conditions of the saints is, that they are to be identified with Jesus Christ in His reign - that is, those who ‘overcome  Not all saints are to be elevated to this position; this is for victorious saints.”

 

 

Dr. J. Hudson Taylor of China, the outstanding missionary, said:- “We wish to place on record our solemn conviction that not all who are Christians, or think themselves such, will attain to that resurrection of which St. Paul speaks in Philippians 3: 11, or will thus meet the Lord in the air.  Unto those who by lives of consecration manifest that they are not of the world, but are looking for Him, ‘He will appear without sin unto salvation’.” - From Union And Communion (ed. 5, p. 83).

 

 

R. Govett, M.A. - “It is a matter of sad observation that every species and degree of crime is committed, and has been committed, by believers after their conversion: so that there may be positive and entire forfeiture of the kingdom, and only the lowest position in Eternal Life after it.  The native magnitude of this truth must speedily redeem it from all obscurity.  Those who have the single eye will perceive its amplitude of evidence, and embrace it, in spite of the solemn awe of God which it produces, and the depth of our own personal responsibility which it discloses  Many such testimonies can be adduced from those who have not been regarded as teachers of the foregoing message. - W.F.R.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

158

 

SELECTIVE RAPTURE AND

“NOT A HOOF LEFT BEHIND

 

 

 

REPEATEDLY, when the subject of Selective Rapture has come up of late, the reply has been “There shall not a hoof be left behind  The manner in which this Scripture is quoted is meant to leave us in no doubt that this is the death-blow to Selective Rapture.  We readily admit that there is a sound of finality about the quotation, if indeed it can be made to refer to Selective Rapture; but does it?  The quotation is taken from Ex. 10: 26 (context 24-27) and refers to God’s contest with Pharaoh.  The latter is now willing to let the Israelites leave Egypt on condition that they leave their flocks and herds behind.  To this Moses replied:- “There shall not a hoof be left behind  This was God’s answer to that stubborn ruler.

 

 

When our friends quote to us, “There shall not a hoof be left behind”, they mean us to understand that not a single believer will be left on earth after the Rapture of 1 Thess. 4: 15-17 has taken place.  So ignorant are they of the teaching of the New Testament on this subject that they do not know that all referred to in 1 Thess. 4: 15-17 had already been left behind when the Firstfruits were raptured before the Great Tribulation commenced, Rev. 12: 5, 14: 1-5.  Furthermore if they would only look at Ex. 10: 26 and its context (24-27) they would quickly discover that Ex. 10: 26 can at best only be made to apply to the New Birth of a believer, when he departs from the World (Egypt).  When the time came for the Israelites to enter Canaan - answering to the Rapture - “ALL THE HOOFS” were left behind, except the feet of Joshua and Caleb.  These two, of all the millions that left Egypt, alone trod the sacred soil of Canaan, for they followed the Lord wholly.

 

 

We wish to remind our friends that it was the purpose of God that all the Israelites who left Egypt should and could enter the Promised Land.  They sadly failed because of prolonged unbelief and disobedience.  Only two Overcomers entered the land, the rest having been left behind in the Wilderness; and these things are especially recorded to warn believers of the present Dispensation that they should not fail to enter the Heavenly [and Millennial] Canaan (of which these were a type) through unbelief, ignorance and laziness.

 

 

It is our Lord’s desire that all believers should have part in the First Resurrection.  He who knows the end from the beginning has made it perfectly clear that the majority will repeat the grave blunder of the Israelites who were behind in the Wilderness.

 

 

Thus we find that Ex. 10: 26 instead of being a death-blow to Selective Rapture proves it up to the hilt.  It further proves that those who use it in the above manner “wrest this Scripture” to their own undoing, 2 Peter 3: 16, for it teaches the very opposite to what they intend it to teach.  This ignorance is unfortunately met with in regard to the whole subject of the Lord’s Second Advent.

 

 

The Jews of old said within themselves, - “We have Abraham to our Father therefore every blessing that God can bestow is sure to us regardless of any condition.  We know that through their vain conceit they missed God’s wonderful [promised]* Salvation.  Even so, there is a large section of present day [regenerate] believers, who boast of their standing in Christ assuming that sharing the Throne of Christ, and a part in the First Resurrection, is a dead certainty as far as they are concerned, yet being totally ignorant of the fact that these blessings will never be theirs unless they fulfil the conditions that God has attached to them.

 

[* NOTE: The word ‘Salvation’ in this context, has nothing whatsoever to do with the salvation they presently had received: it has a reference to that salvation which they could have had, if only they obeyed and trusted their God!  All too often, the redeemed people of God, fail to see the importance of a future salvation, “ready to be revealed in the last time … the salvation of souls … and the glories that should follow” (1 Peter 1: 5, 9, 11b, R.V.) - at some Divinely appointed time in the near future!]

 

 

Eternal Life is the Free Gift of God to all believers, but part in the First Resurrection and Reigning with Christ on His Throne is only promised to, and obtained by, Overcomers.  They are not a Free Gift, but a Reward to whole-hearted devotion to Christ; “for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saintsRev. 19: 8 R. V.

 

 

I am sewing, sewing day by day

A dress in time I shall display;

I want to make it fit and fair,

This dress my soul will have to wear;

And every day and passing minute,

I’m putting common stitches in it.

 

 

If the reader desires to be a Caleb, he will have to be prepared to stand alone amidst the very people of God.  He will have to go further and deeper into this subject than popular Periodicals and Preachers will take him.  If he desires to go more fully into this matter, we recommend him to write for the undermentioned free leaflets, written by aged and deeply taught Servants of God, who have no other desire but to glorify their God and help their brethren.  All it will cost you is a stamped-addressed envelope, and you will receive.

 

 

-------

 

 

REIGNING

 

 

GOD would have granted to all Israel reigning glory in the kingdom; but He found only a few from that unbelieving nation who would allow Him to have His way with their lives.  Israel as a whole therefore has lost the honour awaiting those proved faithful under the old covenant.

 

 

In this age of grace God seeks rulers for His kingdom.  The promises by means of which He encourages us and strengthens us to allow Him fully to prepare us are many.  Notice:- “If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us” (2 Tim. 2: 12).  “And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together” (Rom. 8: 17).  “Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?  Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?” (1 Cor. 6: 2, 3).

 

 

The crowns which are offered to us, provided that we meet specific conditions, distinctly point to positions of highest authority in the kingdom of Christ.  Crowns indicate the rank and the authority of the wearers. Comparatively few persons are worthy of them.  Who are worthy we can readily learn from the Scripture conditions attached to the offer of each.  To those who endure temptation is given the crown of life (James 1: 12).  To those exercising self-control in all things is given the incorruptible crown (1 Cor. 9: 25).  To those who love His appearing and finish their course is given the crown of righteousness (2 Tim. 4: 8).  To those who faithfully care for the flock of God is given the crown of glory (1 Pet. 5: 4).  To those who win converts who stand fast to the glory of God is given the crown of rejoicing (1 Thess. 2: 19).

 

 

The promise in 1 Corinthians 6: 2, 3 reveals the scope of the inheritance which falls to the obedient in the church of God. To these is promised authority not only in the world but also over angels whose habitation is the heavenly places.  In the church God is preparing authorities to reign in His kingdom both on earth and in the heavenly places.  Many of these have already fallen asleep in Christ.  Tremendous events must occur before they and we, if obedient, shall reign with Christ.  All the church together must be caught up to meet Christ, every member receiving a glorified [and immortal] body - [of “flesh and bones” (Luke 24: 39, R.V.)] - like His.  At the judgment seat of Christ we shall learn what will be our eternal service as determined by the fiery test of all our earthly works.  We await also the return of the Lord Jesus Christ to earth as King before those fit to reign can commence to exercise their appropriate authority.

 

 

One of the most powerful incentives which a Christian can know is the realization that God offers him surpassing reward, even the honour of reigning with Christ, if he continues obedient to Him to the point of suffering while living now on earth.  Christians have neglected this supremely important truth, and so they lack its power to fortify them unto all obedience for Christ’s sake.

 

 

When our Lord appears and establishes His [millennial] kingdom by indisputable right, He will have ready His full staff of administrators; princes, rulers, and officials of all degrees of authority.  These will abolish all rule save His own.  These will destroy the works of wickedness in the earth.  These will compel the nations to submit to the Lord.  These will maintain perfect order and righteousness in all parts of the kingdom.  The Lord’s staff of administrators will be thoroughly trustworthy to perform His least command, for He tried them and proved them by the discipline of varied experiences when they lived on earth.  These He will send forth throughout His kingdom to put all His enemies under His feet.

 

 

We may exclaim, “How trifling this life appears in comparison with the experiences we shall have in the kingdom of Christ!” Yet not a moment of this present life lacks significance.  For God has designed everything for our training, to make us ready to rule in His kingdom.  And does not His training exactly suit us?  How real a struggle we have to obey Him even in small matters; how unceasing must be our self-denial every waking moment; how easily our hearts are diverted to other things besides His interests, which ever must be supreme in our lives.  Yes, the Lord trains us in the wisest fashion as we abide in the place of His choice.  That place is the only place where the specific training can be found which will make us ready for His specific eternal honours for us, to His glory.   - The Prophetic Word.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

159

 

CONSTANT READINESS

 

 

BY SARAH FOULKES MOORE

 

 

 

THE unannounced hour of our Lord’s return makes imperative constant readiness.  As a prophet foretelling His own Advent, our Lord gives to His disciples emphatic and pointed warnings to watchful readiness (Matt. 24 and 25).

 

 

“WATCH ... lest coming suddenly He find YOU sleeping.  And what I say unto YOU, I say unto all, WATCH” (Mark 13: 36-37).

 

 

Speaking as one with authority, our Lord begins and ends this solemn Advent-warning with the single, explicit command to WATCH!

 

 

Christians who are really preparing for the Lord’s impending Advent are to-day living in the ever-vigilant attitude of heart, life and conduct that springs from one constant and predominating aim - that they may be accounted worthy to escape the Judgment Wrath that is now coming swiftly upon the end of this Age.

 

 

Luke 21: 34-36 makes it startling and plain that translation is an escape from judgment.  Many are taking for granted that they are ready to escape.  How presumptuous their assumption when contrasted to the example Scripture sets before us in Paul!  In anticipation he writes to the Philippians:- “Not that I have already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after ... I Press towards the mark for the prize

 

 

Paul lived out his daily Christian experience as a man running a race with the purpose in view of winning the prize.  He stripped himself in his race for the crown laid up for all them who overcome and live godly in Christ Jesus (Rev. 12: 11).  Thus Paul could say “Thanks be unto God who always causeth us to triumph in Christ  That he might be a victor and not a victim of his circumstances Paul put heart and soul into his Christian experience.  He strained every nerve, bent every muscle to apprehend that for which Christ apprehended him.  Not long before he departed he evidently attained to the high calling of God in Christ, for he said, “I am ready now ... I have fought a good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept the faith ... henceforth there is laid up for me a crown ... which the Lord ... shall give me in that day.”  What a rapturous assurance was Paul’s!  And it may be ours, if we, like Paul, press into the overcomings that make us more than conquerors over the world, the flesh and Satan.

 

 

Enoch was translated because he had the testimony that he pleased God.  The carnal mind is enmity against God.  Can we, therefore, hope to walk with God and please Him as long as we have any carnality, fleshliness, earthliness in us? “I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal ... for ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal and walk as men(1 Cor. 3).

 

 

The words “WATCH” and “PRAY” are constantly on the lips of our Lord when warning of His sudden thief-like returning.  All teaching, all preaching, all activity which annuls the Lord’s solemn warning to His own to take heed to themselves and watch and pray always makes for dangerous unalertness.  This is the reason why many Christians to-day are walking carelessly, as though going to a picnic, when as a matter of fact, we are in the very hour of the Advent and judgment has already begun at His Sanctuary.  The [coming] rapture itself is a token of that judgment on those who are left.  Hence the whole strategy of Satan is to prevent the vigilance and alertness the Lord has so solemnly counselled.

 

 

“So shall also the coming of the Son of man be.  There shall two be in a field: one shall be taken and the other left ... WATCH, therefore, for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come” (Matt. 24: 39-42).

 

 

It has been said the only difference between the one the Lord takes in translation and the one left to earth’s last judgments is the difference of watchful readiness.  In His last discourses our Lord sought to rouse with exhortations to watchfulness the unwatchful disciple, the “robbed good man of the house,” and the unfaithful steward (Matt. 24 and 25).

 

 

“Watch therefore for ye know neither the day nor the hour when the Son of Man cometh  Christ made ever-pressing the necessity of being ever ready.  “Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning: and ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their Lord ... Blessed are those servants, whom the Lord when He cometh shall find WATCHING” (Luke 12: 35-37).

 

 

We stand on the threshold of Christ’s returning.  Every tick of the clock draws us nearer.  The darkness of earth’s midnight is overspreading.  The coming of the Bridegroom is at hand.  Hence His Bride is making herself ready.  The Spirit of the Antichrist is abroad in the world.  The great tribulation is casting its shadows before.  Christians, look up!  Be instantly ready, vigilant, watchful; “Now is the time for you to wake out of sleep; for now is salvation nearer to us than when we first believed.  The night is far spent, and the day is at hand” (Rom. 13: 11, 12).

 

 

An almost imperceptible spiritual movement is at work in the hearts of all true believers, separating the gold from the dross, the real from the unreal, the precious from the vile, the chaff from the wheat.  It comes like a sacred hush upon the soul, the overshadowing of the Presence drawing near.

 

 

Christ is coming!  Be ready when He comes.  Separate yourself from the world’s indulgence.  Disentangle yourself from your immersion in the affairs of this life.  Watch and pray always!  A carnal Christian cannot be watchful.  We can only watch as we keep spiritually awake.  The word “Watch” means to be spiritually aroused, to be on the constant alert.  “I sleep, but my heart waketh; it is the voice of my beloved that knocketh, saying, Open to me ... my dove, my undefiled, for my head is filled with dew, and my locks with the drops of the night” (Song of Songs 5: 2).

 

 

He is coming when we think not.  There is to be no warning.  “As the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west, so shall also the coming of the Son of Man be” (Matt. 24: 27).  One quick, blinding flash and the [regenerate] watchful will be with the Lord.  The [regenerate] unwatchful according to our Lord’s own words will not escape earth’s last judgments (Luke 21: 34-36).

 

 

“The spirit of a man is the lamp of the Lord” (Prov. 20: 27).  In His parable of the virgins our Lord reveals there will be a lamp-trimming revival on the eve of His returning.  How long does it take to trim a lamp?  The wise have only time to trim their lamps, not fill them, before the door is closed.  It is going to require constant, vigilant preparation of heart, life and lip to make and keep us ready to meet and greet our soul’s Beloved when He, all glorious, comes to receive those “accepted in the Beloved

 

 

“One known sin un-dropped, one known command disobeyed, one known truth unbelieved, one part of the life knowingly unyielded, and we stand in jeopardy.  The last shadows are falling across the world, and therefore across your life.  Yet you are not ready; but there is time to win the victory before the sun goes down. YOUR COMING JUDGE IS YOUR PRESENT SAVIOUR.” - The Midnight Cry.

 

 

-------

 

 

FIRST CROWN - THE CROWN OF INCORRUPTION

 

 

1. “Know ye not, that those who run in a race, run indeed all of them, but one (only) receiveth the prize?  So run that ye may attain.  And every one that enters the contest is temperate in all things.  Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown but we an incorruptible.  I therefore so run, not as uncertainly so fight I, not as one that beateth the air: but I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection; lest by any means, after having acted the herald to others, I myself should be rejected” 1 Cor. 9: 24-27. (Greek.)

 

 

The crown promised above appears to belong to those who use self-denial in subduing the lusts of the flesh. He that sows to the flesh, reaps of it corruption: he that sows to the spirit, reaps of it incorruption, and the crown of incorruption.  For the flesh is an enemy to be conquered, and to the victor is promised the crown.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

160

 

ARE WE READY FOR THE COMING?

 

 

BY SARAH FOULKES MOORE

 

 

 

“What I say unto you I say unto all, WATCH

 

 

-------

 

 

 

VERY soon the Lord is Coming.  He is coming as a Bridegroom.  He is coming for a Bride.  He leaves Ivory Palaces to come for her because He greatly desires her beauty.  The beauty of the Bride of Christ is portrayed in the Bridal Psalm (45) as “all glorious within  The glory of the Lord is mentioned many times in Scripture. One translation of the word “glory” is beauty, meaning the beauty of the Lord.  Hence we worship the Lord in the beauty of His holiness.  So likewise His Bride for whom He comes from Heaven to receive is portrayed in prophetic type and anti-type, as adorned in the beauty of holiness.  Her clothing is of wrought gold (Psa. 45). Christ espouses to Himself a Bride who is glorious within and without.  By revelation Paul sees Christ presenting to Himself this Bride, “Glorious ... not having spot or wrinkle  John, the seer, envisions the Bride in Heaven.  The one thing he emphasizes is the fact she had made herself ready.

 

 

The Church of the Firstborn is spoken of as a virgin, meaning a people separated from the world unto God. Paul wrote to the Christians under his ministry, “I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ” (2 Cor. 11: 2).  Christian, are you all-glorious within?  Are your spiritual robes without spot or wrinkle?  God abhors garments spotted by the flesh.  He wants us to abhor them.  Enoch is a type of the translation saints.  He had the testimony that he pleased God.  Christian, is your life chaste and pure?  Is your walk with the Lord so attractive that He will greatly desire your beauty?  If you or I have one thing in us that is contrary to His Word we cannot please Him -  He measures our Love to Him by the measure of our obedience to His Word (Jn. 14: 15).

 

 

Now in this hour of His appearing the matter of making ourselves ready is the most important thing that concerns us.  Many are taking for granted they are ready.  Measured by Christ’s own words to His disciples, readiness for translation does not consist, as many erroneously suppose, in being saved or filled with the Spirit. We need to go to the Word of God and see for ourselves what conditions He imposes for translation and reigning with Him.  In His Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24 and 25) the Lord foretells the terrible calamities coming upon the whole earth.  With pointed warnings and explicit commands He cautions His disciples to escape judgments.  And He tells them how.  It is not without significance that His words of prudence and caution are not spoken to the Church as a Body but to individuals:- “Take heed to yourselves lest at any time your hearts be overcharged The original Greek renders “yourselves” and “your” with peculiar emphasis.  “Watch ye therefore and pray always that ye may be accounted worthy to escape” … “Because thou didst keep the word of my patience I also will keep thee from the hour of trial which is to come upon the whole world.” … “Blessed is he that keepeth his garments  In the Lord’s emphatic admonitions to His disciples to be wary and watchful, He does not encourage them to rely on their born-again experience.  Neither does He encourage them to rest in any past blessing; nor does He tell them that, being filled with the Spirit, they can drift along.  The Lord’s emphasis is laid on WATCHING, HEEDING, PRAYING.  The escape according to Christ’s own words is made on condition of personal effort and is wholly a reward of the effort to be ready.

 

 

What Christ says should mean everything to us.  His oft-repeated command is to “WATCH  To watch means, in the original, “to be alert”; “to be aroused”; “to be awake”.  In this hour of His coming He has shown us in pointed warnings that the only way to escape the trouble coming upon the whole earth is to “WATCH AND PRAY ALWAYS” (Matt. 24: 42; 25: 13; Mk. 13: 35; Lu. 21: 34-36; 1 Thess. 5: 6; 1 Pet. 4: 7; Rev. 3: 2; Rev. 16: 15).  Again the Lord says, - “Strive to enter in ... for many will seek to enter in and shall not be able” (Lu. 13: 24).  The Greek rendering of “strive” is “agonize” - agonize to enter in.  Paul, seeking to win Christ, as the Bridegroom, said “I press” towards the mark (Phil. 3).

 

 

How great will be the disappointment of the careless, lukewarm, unready ones in the hour of the escape (Lu. 21: 34-36).  Now, before it is too late, is the time for us to awake out of sleep and stir ourselves to watching and prayer, for the signs of His appearing are everywhere around us.  The tares are ripening.  So is the wheat. The ingathering is near.

 

 

The Lord rebuking the worldly Laodicean Christians said, - “I know your works, that thou art neither hot nor cold ... so because thou art lukewarm, I will spue thee out of my mouth  Christian, is your service for the master, your praying, your Bible reading, the testimony of your life in private and public, cold, or hot, or lukewarm?  Ask yourself this question, - “Am I a wise virgin trimming my life by the Word of God, or am I a foolish one, looking for His Coming but not preparing for it In contrast to the ease-loving, pleasure-loving Christian of today, how different was Paul’s pressing towards the goal.  He put forth desperate effort to win Christ as the Bridegroom.  He stripped himself of every weight; suffered the loss of all things that he might in the fervour of his effort attain to the first resurrection out from among the dead (marginal rend. Phil. 3: 11).

 

 

“Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning; and ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord” (Lu. 12: 35-36).  There is a wall of worldly separation between most Christians and Christ today which renders impossible watchfulness and prayerfulness.  Our Churches are full of men and women living in slothful ease and selfish indulgence, unwatchful gliding, drifting with the world, careless of the rigid requirements imposed by the Lord upon all accounted worthy to escape the things overtaking the world and to stand before the Son of Man.

 

 

“When He shall appear, we shall be like him: ... every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself even as he is pure” (1 Jno. 3: 2-3).  “The imminent return of our Lord avers Dr. Torrey, “is the great Bible argument for a pure, unselfish, devoted, unworldly, active Christian life  According to John, the apostle, everyone who hath the hope of Christ’s return, purifies himself.  Beloved, the question of great moment is not, Is the Church Ready?  But are You Ready?  The Lord is preparing to take His place on the Throne; and to those who will go all the way with Him to His standard of perfection, by watching and praying always, He gives this glorious promise, - “To Him that overcometh I will grant to sit with Me in My Throne even as I also overcame, and am sat down with My Father in His Throne” (Rev. 3: 21).

 

 

-------

 

 

LET NO MAN TAKE THY CROWN

 

 

I remember having read at the time of the pagan persecution, about twelve men, Christians, who were under sentence of death, and the jailor of the prison had a strange dream just before the execution was to take place. He saw an extraordinarily fine-looking man coming into the prison, and he had twelve crowns with him, and he went and tried the crowns on the head of the first prisoner, and the second, and right on to the eleventh, and the crown fitted the head of everyone.  At last he came to the twelfth and the crown did not fit him at all, and he told the jailor to come over and he put the crown on his head and it fitted him perfectly and he left it there in his dream. The next day the prisoners were taken away to be burned but when it came to the twelfth man he recanted and cursed Christ and when the jailor saw that he said, “That is not what Christ deserves  He was asked, “And would you recant  “No,” he said, and took that man’s place at the stake and got the Crown which awaited him.  And so ought you, and so ought I to see that we would not lose the crown.

 

- NEIL CAMERON.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

161

 

THE HIDDEN KINGDOM

 

 

BY GORDON CHILVERS

 

 

 

THE great hope of the Jews was the Messianic Kingdom.  Yet when it was within their grasp they refused it. This Kingdom and its glory were an important theme in the Old Testament prophets, and the Jews earnestly looked for the great day when the Kingdom of God should come on earth.  At the time of the Incarnation the Romans had conquered Palestine and had the Kingdom come at that time it would have brought to the Jews the liberty they sighed for.  Yet we read the strange statement that Christ “came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1: 11).

 

 

“The kingdom of heaven” - that is, the rule of God in this world - “is like unto treasure” (Matthew 13: 44).  In the East rich people used to divide their goods into three parts.  One they used in commerce or for their necessary support; one they turned into jewels, which, should it prove needful to fly, could easily be carried with them; and the third part of it they buried.  The “treasure” of the parable is the promised Kingdom of the Messiah.  It is the reign on earth of the Lord of Glory.  In the Old Testament, treasure is said to be the glory of the Kingdom.  Over David’s “treasures was Azmaveth, the son of Adiel: and over the storehouses in the fields, in the cities, and in the villages, and in the castles was Jehonathan the son of Uzziah” (1 Chronicles 27: 25); and other men were employed as well.  So great was David’s treasure that it was a full time job for several men to look after it for him.  So by this figure our Lord shows the incomparable value of the Kingdom of God.

 

 

The treasure was hidden in a field by God for “it is the glory of God to conceal a thing” (Proverbs 25: 2).  This was at the time of the creation of the world.  So Christ addresses those on His right hand at the judgment of the living nations in these words: “Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world” (Matthew 25: 34).  There was no apparent evidence of the Kingdom, when Jesus came.  The descendants of David in the early years of this era were very poor and a foreigner ruled the land.  One of the ruling Caesars tried to find the heirs of David in order that he might prevent them opposing his reign.  He found that the only survivors of the house of David were far too poor and insignificant to cause the slightest trouble.  So the Davidic Kingdom was hidden from the eyes of men.  The unregenerate man therefore has no idea of its existence, and, consequently, has no desire to share it and enjoy its glory.

 

 

It is hidden “in a field”; this, Christ tells us, “is the world” (v. 38).  So then the sphere of Christ’s Kingdom will be this present world.  Zechariah (14: 9) says: “The Lord shall be king over all the earth”.  This is the coming [Millennial and Messianic] Kingdom.  At present it is hidden in the field.  It is treasure which a man found. There was only one Man Who could find such a treasure - the Man Christ Jesus.  When a man was spoken of in a previous parable our Lord, expounding that part of the parable, referred the words to Himself.  This Man is spoken of in the epistle of the Hebrews. “For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come”, i.e., millennial age.  “Thou hast put all things in subjection under his (Christ’s) feet” (Hebrews 2: 5 and 8).  He found it and therefore it was not a treasure that was offered to Him.  Very soon after our Lord’s birth He received treasure as a gift from the Magi.  “And when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh” (Matthew 2: 11).  Just as Jesus was starting on His ministry, the Devil came to Him, and brought the treasure before Him, and offered it to Him.  “The devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and showeth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them”.  But Jesus refused this help in finding the Kingdom for the payment demanded was idolatry.  “All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me” (Matthew 4: 8 and 9). Hebrews (9: 12) tells us that the treasure which He found was of inestimable worth - far greater than all the treasures of the earth combined.  “He entered in once into the holy place, having obtained” - found - “eternal redemption for us”.  How blessed it is to know that such a great treasure was for us!

 

 

Having discovered where the treasure lay, the next thing the man does is to hide it.  Now it is at first sight difficult to see how any man could hide great treasure and be blameless.  Christ hid the treasure because circumstances made it necessary.  John the Baptist came to Israel as the forerunner of the Messiah and announced that the Kingdom was discovered.  Then Christ Himself preached: “The kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Matthew 4: 17).  But Israel did not heed the words of the greatest of all prophets or of the King Himself.  Instead of accepting the good news that the treasure had been found they asked for a sign of it.  “He was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation” (Luke 17: 20).

 

 

Jesus used the past tense, “hid for He had done it when He spoke.  It was the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit by the Jews (Matthew 12: 24 and 31), which caused our Lord to hide the treasure.  The very method Christ used in teaching people by parables is the proof that the Kingdom has been hidden again.  As our Lord approached Calvary He had to announce with tears that the treasure was hidden from the eyes of the Jews. “And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it, Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes  Instead of receiving the Kingdom they would be a subject people.  “And they shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee, and they shall not leave thee one stone upon another”.  The reason for this awful calamity lay in the fact that they would not believe that Christ had found the hid treasure.  “Because thou knowest not the time of thy visitation” (Luke 19: 41, 42, 44).  Jerusalem was the centre of David’s Kingdom and will be the centre of the Messiah’s Kingdom.  But as the Kingdom is hidden at present, Jerusalem is trodden down by the Gentiles.

 

 

The hiding of the treasure brought sorrow to the finder of the Kingdom but “for joy thereof” He goes back realising the value of His treasure and is elated with the possibility of ownership.  When but a little treasure was exhibited to view, we have the only recorded instance in the whole of the Gospels of our Lord’s joy.  He had sent the 70 out to preach and to heal the sick.  They return to Him after exhibiting to the world something of “the powers of the age to come  “In that hour Jesus rejoiced in spirit, and said, I thank Thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes: even so, Father; for so it seemed good in Thy sight” (Luke 10: 21).  It was joy that spurred on our Lord as He came to the dark days bearing the punishment of the world’s sin.  Jesus “for the joy that was set before him endured the cross despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Hebrews 12: 2).  When the treasure is exhibited to all there will be even greater joy (Matthew 25: 23).

 

 

After finding the treasure He goes back - a phrase which “denotes that He was away from His home and went back to His home again”.  “It is the expression that is used almost without exception, in describing the departure of our Lord from the earth” (R. Govett).  So our Lord says: “I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father” (John 16: 28).  Now the Jews knew that the field belonged to Christ.  Jesus pointed this out very clearly to them in the parable.  “Last of all he (God) sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son.  But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance” (Matthew 21: 37 and 38).  So Christ does not stay longer in the field, but returns to the Father.

 

 

Then He “selleth all that he hath  He was the Son of David by birth but gives up the title of the throne.  The people would at one time have taken Him by force and made Him King - but all they wanted was a leader to conquer the Romans, but Christ would not have it.  He had already given much but “being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Phil. 2: 6-8).  It is no wonder that Paul calls attention to the great sacrifice He made that He might purchase the field. “For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich” (2 Cor. 8: 9).  The price to be paid was His very life.  He gave all and could give nothing more.  “The Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister and to give his life a ransom for many” (Matthew 20: 28).  (It is very interesting to observe that Christ by the price of His life bought a field (Matthew 27: 7).)  With the purchase price He buys the field, which according to Christ’s own interpretation is the world.  So the Samaritans say: “This is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world” (John 4 : 42).  He has paid the price and so received the title-deeds of the world.  Christ gave everything for one field and at last He will receive it as His own purchased possession.  “The seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever” (Rev. 11: 15).

 

 

We see in our Lord’s parable something of His love for the world.  There the parable leaves us, for at the present moment Christ has left the field, but it is our great joy to know that this same Jesus shall come again to receive the treasure which He has purchased.  The mystery of the parable is that Christ should have to buy the field although it was His by creation.  All things were made for Him, and by Him, and to Him all belong, but yet He must redeem the purchased possession.  The treasure will not be unearthed until He comes for it.  Christ now waits and longs for the time when He shall take the field and reign for ever and ever and have His children with Him.  We, too, who know something of the Kingdom in mystery, look for the Kingdom in manifestation. What a time of blessing it will be, when our Lord is crowned King of Kings and Lord of Lords!

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

162

 

THE REWARD OF THE INHERITANCE

 

 

“Whatever ye do, work heartily, as unto the Lord, and not unto men; knowing that from the Lord ye shall receive the recompense of the inheritance  Colossians 3: 23-24, R.V.

 

 

-------

 

 

PERHAPS it is a commonplace to say that salvation is by grace.  Eternal life is a gift, the gift of God.  “By grace are ye saved through faith”, not by any works of righteousness which you can do.  “He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved God so loved the world that He gave His Son, and to those who receive this precious Saviour the right is accorded to become sons of God.  We gladly worship and adore the Author of this great and eternal salvation from the penalty and the power of sin.

 

 

In his Epistle to the Colossians, Paul writes, “Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance” (3: 24), and placing our emphasis upon the word “reward”, we proceed to ask what Paul means by this.  Is it possible that this man, the foremost exponent of the freeness of God’s salvation, who was himself an outstanding example of the operation of sovereign grace, is here suggesting that this [eternal] salvation comes to a man as a reward for his service rendered?  No, by no means.  He knew full well and unalterably that he had begun in grace, and there can be no falling away from that glorious position.  Grace must lay the foundation, and one day crown all with the topstone.  He would be turning back again to weak and beggarly elements if he weakened in any way, and yet he speaks of “the reward of the inheritance”.

 

 

Did he mean that after all, even with all that he has said and has done, there is some sense in which eternal life can be merited and [eternal] salvation earned?  Again we emphatically repeat - no, not at all.  He does indeed write of the inheritance as being a reward for service rendered, but it is perfectly plain that he was addressing those who already possessed eternal life, and he regards them as being already risen with Christ (verse 1).

 

 

The reward of the inheritance therefore is not a permit to enter into Heaven at last; it is not the bestowal of the right and authority to become a citizen of the New Jerusalem.  These are already indisputably assured to all who accept Christ, and place their confidence alone upon the finished work of the Lord Jesus upon Calvary’s Cross.  Their [eternal] salvation depends solely upon what He did, and their standing is consequent upon their faith in Him; but having received the free gift of eternal life, their inheritance in the coming Kingdom of their Saviour, depends solely upon their works done here and now.  The saints will be in Heaven as the result of the grace of Christ: what they are now, and the position they hope to occupy in Christ’s coming Millennial Kingdom, will be the result of the sort of service they render to Him here and now.  Hence we find that the Apostle is exhorting regenerate Christians at Colossae to strive after the highest.

 

 

Elsewhere in his Epistles Paul deals with these truths in a somewhat different fashion.  To the Corinthians he writes that there are some who will be saved at the last though “as by fire” - saved, yes, certainly, but saved whilst seeing all their goods go up in smoke.

 

 

A friend, speaking to the writer on one occasion, said that he would be glad to get into Heaven even if he only just managed to get inside.  There may be many who might be included in this class of Christians; content with their own salvation and with little knowledge of sacrificial service; others again earnestly desire an ‘abundant entrance’.  In which class will you be?

 

 

Looking again at Paul’s words we find that they constitute clear instructions on the matter of this inheritance, as to how its value may be enhanced to the believer.  Because the inheritance into which he will one day enter and enjoy, is a reward, therefore let him strive diligently to make it ever an increasingly magnificent place and condition.  What a powerful incentive this should be to all who are already ‘in Christ’, and who presently enjoy His salvation!  What a joy it will be to have something to lay at His feet in that transcendent hour!  How poor will those be who have earned little for this glorious day!  Of course, even to get into Heaven and this coming inheritance is by far beyond and better than gaining even the whole world today.  To merit this worthy inheritance is infinitely more important than the enjoyment of a pleasant house, wealth, position, comfort and the approval of doubtful friends.  Of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance.

 

 

These being the facts then, friend, why do you bend all your energies to get to yourself these rewards here and now, and give such scant attention to your millennial position?  Can it be that you are really more concerned about what men think about you in this present evil day, and more interested in your appearance before them than you are about how you will look before redeemed sons of God during ‘the age to come’?  How strange is the earnest devotion which so many regenerate Christians give to the pursuit of the material things of today, in comparison to the slight attention given to securing for themselves a suitable reward hereafter!  An unsaved man foolishly rejects the offer of mercy and that to his everlasting loss; and meanwhile his saved neighbour unwisely neglects the reward in God’s promised Glory which might be his, and gives his best efforts to what he can enjoy but for a brief time.

 

 

How then can the Christian lay up treasure and improve his inheritance?  Paul gives the Holy Spirit’s formula in verse 23.  His instructions are plain and complete: “And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men; knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ”.  Here is the secret made plain.  You are eternally saved - praise God for that.  Now as to this reward, live only for Jesus.  See Him as your Master, the One for whom you are working.  Hence do everything, the big things and the small matters, as unto Him and not as to men.  From morning till night walk as if His eyes were upon you.  Let nothing enter into your life which you know He would not altogether approve.  Thus you will be serving the Lord Christ who loves you dearly, and who laid down His life to redeem you.  And serving Him, assuredly He will pay you and pay you well.  The thought of the reward should constrain you and be an impetus for the best work you can do.  In a word, consecrate your all to Him, yield yourself to God, live only for Him, serve Christ and not men.

 

 

This is a high ideal, and yet it is simply normal Christianity.  It is our reasonable service.  Give it unrestrainedly, and the day is coming when you will rejoice that you did not hold back.  Refuse the appeal, do not respond and you will be saved, and it may be “so as by fire”, and have nothing to show for your life.  Why seek an easeful estate now and miss this rich inheritance which might be yours by serving the Lord on the mission field or in some ministry of love which would cost you something for His sake?  Why spend so much of your powers for present passing things which breed vanity and emptiness, when the highest service beckons you, and meanwhile will fit you for an infinitely larger enjoyment of God in the life beyond.  Serve the Lord and you will never regret it.  How sweet it will be to be greeted by our blessed Lord, with the words “Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world”.  There is no anticipation so glorious as this.

 

 

-------

 

 

Now it is granted at once, that no believer will be brought into judgment before Christ, to try whether he is justified and reconciled to God or no.  He has become justified, and is no longer an enemy, but a servant.  He shall certainly be finally saved.  But the Saviour and His Apostles both assert that all Christians are servants, and shall give account to Him of their conduct since they believed, to be rewarded or punished, according to their deeds, in the coming day of reward according to works.  This is the teaching of direct statements, such as Rom. 2. and 14., and of 2 Cor. 5. - to take no more passages.  This is the doctrine of several of our Lord’s parables; such as the Unmerciful Servant, the Steward, the Talents, and the Pounds.  What means that - “The Son of man is as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.  Watch ye therefore; for ye know not when the Master of the house cometh, at even, or at midnight, or at the cock-crowing, or in the morning; lest coming suddenly He find you sleeping!  And what say I unto you, I say unto all - Watch” (Mark 13: 34-37).  And must we not say that the majority of Christ’s servants are asleep? dreaming that the world is getting better, and is about to be converted by the preaching of the Gospel of God’s grace?

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

163

 

THE PRIZE OF OUR CALLING

 

 

BY D. M. PANTON.

 

 

 

GOD is calling sinners to the Cross: He is calling believers to the Crown.  Paul presents this dual truth with crystal clearness (Phil. 3: 4-15).  He opens this little masterpiece of revelation with a SUPREME HOPELESSNESS.  What is it?  The one man who came nearest to reaching God through his own goodness proved to be the chief of sinners.  Ponder Paul’s incomparable assets: no soul, before or since, ever held up to the face of God a hand filled with such exquisite pearls.  Circumcised - stamped as God’s from infancy; of the stock of Israel - with a blood-right to salvation; of the tribe of Benjamin - a tribe which never broke away; a Hebrew of Hebrews - a full-blooded Jew to the furthest generation back; a Pharisee - intensely orthodox; persecuting the Church - on fire for God’s Law; in the Law blameless - obedient in jot and tittle.  No man ever came so near to winning life through what he was and what he did.  “If any other man” - of any age, or race, or clime - “thinketh to have confidence in the flesh, I yet more  Paul towers over all legalists for ever.  But a sudden and awful discovery blasted his prospects.  “I was alive” (in my own eyes) “apart from law once: but when the commandment”thou shalt not lust”) “came” (home to my conscience), “sin revived” (sprang again into life), “and I died” (saw myself a dead man); “and the commandment, which was” (in God’s design) “unto life, this I found to be” (in fact) “unto death” (Rom. 7: 9, 10).  “If any man thinketh to have confidence in the flesh, I yet more”: but what had inward vision revealed? - a corpse before God.  With Paul’s failure, the whole world lapses into hopeless despair.

 

 

Next, A SUPREME RIGHTEOUSNESS.  Whose?  Not Paul’s; for he had discovered, with Isaiah, that “we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags” (Isa. 64: 6).  He now discovers that what he could not do, Christ did; that what he could not be, Christ was; and that Christ had done it, and been it, in order to take his place (2 Cor. 5: 21).  He instantly drops his own righteousness and seizes Christ’s: he exchanges his own pearls for one priceless, flawless gem.  “I do count them but dung, that I may gain Christ, and be found in Him, not having a righteousness of mine own  ... but that” (righteousness) “which is through faith in Christ  Paul never afterwards doubts his salvation (Rom. 8: 38): for Christ has kept the Law, not with head, hands, and feet only, but with heart also (Ps. 40: 8): and his righteousness is now Paul’s (Rom. 5: 19).  The supreme hopelessness is replaced by a supreme salvation.

 

 

There yet remains A SUPREME UNCERTAINTY.  Here are startling words. “Brethren, I count not myself yet to have apprehended: but I press on  Not apprehended what?  “If by any means I may attain unto the” (select) “resurrection from” (among) “the dead  Press on to what?  “Toward the goal unto the prize of the high calling Salvation [by God’s grace through faith in Christ Jesus] can never be insecure: the Prize can never be assumed until it is won.  Why? (1) Because it is a prize.  If the prize be given on faith without works, it is no more a prize.  “Know ye not that they which run in a race all run, but one receiveth the prize? Even so run, that ye may attain” (1 Cor. 9: 24; 2 Tim. 2: 5). (2) No splendour of past service can guarantee immunity from backsliding.  None so renounced, so suffered, so served as Paul: yet he assumes no prize.  For backsliding forfeits the crown (Rev. 3: 11; 2 John 8). (3) False doctrines which rob God of His glory will rob us of ours: therefore “let no man rob you of your prize” (Col. 2: 18; 1 Cor. 3: 15). (4) Fleshly sins also disqualify (Eph. 5: 5).  Therefore “I buffet my body, and bring it into bondage: lest by any means, after that I have preached to others, I myself should be rejected” (for the crown) (1 Cor. 9: 24-27).  The insecurity of the chief of apostles binds insecurity of reward for ever on the Church of God. “Not that I have already obtained, or am already made perfect: but I press on, if so be that I may apprehend

 

 

All therefore culminates in A SUPREME EFFORT.  “This one thing I do  Is this for Paul only?  “Let us therefore” - for he is our inspired example - “as many as be perfect, be thus minded  How?  (1) “Forgetting the things which are behind  The immeasurable value of the prize may be computed by the immense sacrifices necessary to obtain it.  Its cost is a crucified world.  “Blessed is the man to whom the world, with all her rags of honour, is crucified, and who holds her to be worth no more than a thief on the gallows  Nothing makes the other world more real, or more blessed, than the renunciation of this [evil age] (Luke 14: 33).  (2) “Stretching forward to the things that are before  It is a racer, as Professor Eadie says, in his agony of struggle and hope: every muscle is strained, every vein starting; the chest heaves, and the big drops gather on the brow; the body is bent forward, as if the racer all but touched the goal (Luke 9: 23-26).  (3) “This one thing I do  All his missionary ardour, all his thirst for souls, all his toil for the churches, are bent before this over-mastering passion of his soul; because the running-tracks for the prize God has laid through these channels of holy service; and today’s toil is the measure of tomorrow’s glory (1 Cor. 3: 8; Matt. 5: 11, 12 [1 Pet. 1: 9-11ff.]). (4) It is a calling “upward therefore it is God who is calling. “Walk worthily of God, who is calling you” - [who are regenerate] - “into His own kingdom and glory” (1 Thess. 2: 12).  God is calling us from all earthly glories up to the Throne: brother, will you come?  The Cross is ours for ever: when we have been approved, we receive the Crown (Jas. 1: 12).  We honour God in proportion as we covet His immeasurable rewards.  The apostle not only renounces, he forgets; he not only advances, he presses; he not only gazes, he stretches; he not only does it, but he does it only.  “Let us, as many as be perfect [mature], be thus minded

 

 

-------

 

 

John 21: 15. “When, therefore, they had breakfasted, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, ‘Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou Me more than these He saith unto Him, ‘Yea, Lord, thou knowest that I have a friendship for Thee He saith unto him, ‘Feed My lambs.’”

 

 

Divine wisdom and grace shine forth in the Saviour’s treatment of the penitent apostle.  Most men would have felt that all further intercourse was cut off between Jesus and him who had, after warning, denied all knowledge of Him with oaths and curses.  The Lord would restore Him in grace.  He does not then reproach him.  He does not separate him from His company, and from the company of his fellow-apostles, as is commanded in cases of flagrant sin. ‘With such an one no, not to eat  He seats him at the board which he has spread.  He does not allude to the past, till the meal was ended.  The like would never occur again in the apostle’s life.  He would die a martyr.  But still it was not wise, that no notice should be taken of so heavy a fall; a fall both personal and official.  The offence had been public, and now Jesus touches the root of the matter; the apostle’s too high thoughts of himself and his powers.  How much of trouble and mischief would have been spared to the ancient churches of Christ in the days of the Roman heathenism, if they had taken this as their model of dealing with a fallen brother!  Many refused ever to re-accept to communion one, who, under stress of persecution, had sacrificed to heathen gods to save his life.

 

 

Our Lord addresses him now by his old name of nature.  ‘Simon, son of Jonas  He had shown himself not to be the ‘Rock’ in his late encounter with Satan.  He is called, then, by the name of his earthly father.  And the Master questions his love to Him.  There is a remarkable change and play of words in this narrative, which is difficult to render into exactly equivalent English.  Jesus uses one word to express love.  Peter uses [a different word for ‘love’ -] one implying a less degree; which might best, I think, be translated by, ‘I have a friendship for Thee

 

 

*       *       *        *       *       *       *

 

 

164

 

BE YE ALSO READY

 

 

BY D. M. PANTON

 

 

 

OUR Lord’s picture of the ideal servant of God can become the photograph of each one of us if we respond to the Holy Spirit to the uttermost and to the end.

 

 

First, the girt loin: “let your loins be girded about” (Luke 12: 35).  The flowing garments of the Oriental, if loose, impeded motion and checked work: therefore let your loins be girt up for rapid motion and intense activity.  The Old Testament type enriches the thought. “Thus shall ye eat it; with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand: and ye shall eat it in haste: it is the Lord’s passover.  For I will go through Egypt, and will smite” (Ex. 12: 11).  When God is about to smite the earth with judgments as He smote Egypt, and when the world is about to pass into its death-throes, it is for us to become strangers to that world, and to be ready for instant flight: the world will become our coffin unless it becomes our enemy. That is the meaning of the tightened robe.  It means that service is short, for time is flying. “Since your Father hath seen fit to give you the Kingdom, be that Kingdom, and preparation for it, your chief concern” (Alford).

 

 

Next, there is the lit lamp: “let your lamps be burning  Lamps are kept burning only at night: and all night, unless we sleep.  “From evening to morning,” was the command to Israel, Aaron and his sons shall “cause a lamp to burn continually” (Ex. 27: 20).  “The spirit of a man is the lamp of the Lord” (Prov. 20: 27): every believer is a lit lamp, lit from Jesus, the Light of the World; and through the moral midnight Christ expects us,

at all costs, to keep it blazing.  Darkness in us stumbles other souls.  A blind beggar sat by the side-walk on a dark night with a lantern by his side. “What in the world do you keep a lantern burning for?” asked a passer-by; “you can’t see  “So that folks won’t stumble over me,” was the reply.  It is written of John the Baptist - “He was the lamp that burneth and shineth” (John 5: 35) - burning with heat to God, and shining with light to men.  Burning without shining is zeal without knowledge; shining without burning is light without love: God expects both.

 

 

First, the girt loin - incessant service; next, the lit lamp - radiant witness; now, the looking eyes - the expectant heart.  “Be ye yourselves like unto men looking for their Lord  Since the command has held good for nineteen centuries, it can only mean that Christ may come at any moment; and He strikingly chooses the darkest hours:- “if he shall come in the second watch, and if in the third” (Luke 12: 38).  The Early Church set His return in the first watch; the post-millennialists to-day set it in the fourth watch: Jesus hints the darkest.

 

 

Let the door be on the latch in your home,

For it may be through the midnight He will come.

 

 

The fourth point - watching: “Blessed are those servants, whom the Lord when he cometh shall find watching”: not, blessed are all servants, but blessed are those servants found watching.  What is meant by ‘watching’?  Look at the African explorer as he sits alone by his camp-fire, keeping himself awake because he hears the roar of the lion in the forest close by: he is watching.  Look at that nurse, moving swiftly and silently about the room of a dying man, neglecting her own day-sleep as well as night-sleep, for she knows the crisis is at hand and she must be utterly ready: she is watching.  It means, every faculty attent the whole soul roused to meet a crisis; attention, alarm, hope, all keeping the whole man intently alert!  Our Lord emphasizes exquisitely the urgency of untiring vigilance.  Had the burglar notified his coming in the third watch, the householder could safely sleep through the first and second watches; but the unknown hour of the burglary means that he must sit up all night.  Whatever hour the burglar comes, the householder must be found watching: so the church is to be ready, not because it sees symptoms of the approach, but because it has never been unwatchful.  “For yourselves know perfectly” - and ought to have made arrangements accordingly - “that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night” (1 Thess. 5: 2).  Watch therefore through the night, in Rutherford’s words, as those who have no to-morrow.  “He cometh” - inquisition, approval, promotion; He makes them “sit down” - rest, glory, enthronement; and “shall come and serve them” - the King of kings girding Himself with a towel by the side of His watchful child.  “Of a truth I say unto you, that he will set him over ALL THAT HE HATH

 

 

Finally, readiness: “Be ye also ready”; that is, ‘readiness’ is something other and more than either ‘looking’ or ‘watching  It is all life squared to the Second Advent.  Death can be sudden, but it nearly always throws out warning symptoms: there will be no warning symptoms here: sudden as an avalanche, swift as the lightning, irrevocable as death - one flash, and the watchful will be gone,* and the Great Tribulation will be here.  Are we ready?  A famous ruby was offered for sale to the English government.  The report of the crown jeweller was that it was the finest he had ever seen or heard of; but that one of the “facets,” one of the little cuttings of the face, was slightly fractured.  The result was that that almost invisible flaw reduced its value by thousands of pounds, and it was rejected from the regalia of England.  There are fractures in the ruby of our Christian character and conduct (Gal. 5: 19) which exclude from the coming Reign of Christ: “of the which I forewarn you, even as I did forewarn you, that they which practise such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God** Whatever may have been our failures, we remember Napoleon’s word, after a great defeat:- “There is time to win a victory before the sun goes down.”

 

[* See Luke 21: 34-36. cf. Rev. 3: 10, R.V.  **Gal. 5: 21.  See also Eph. 5: 5 and 1 Cor. 6: 10, R.V. - and context.]

 

 

-------

 

 

THE REST THAT REMAINETH

 

 

By R. E. NEIGHBOUR, D.D.

 

 

 

THE Spirit says (Heb. 4: 1), “Let us fear lest any of you should seem to come short of it” (short of entering into His rest).  The Spirit did not tell saints to fear lest they fall short of Heaven, for the simple reason that eternal life, everlasting life, is promised unconditionally to all who believe on Christ.  What then meaneth this, “Fear lest”?  Heaven is not in the picture at all, neither is eternal life.  The Spirit is talking of the rest that remaineth, the promised Millennial Rest.

 

 

Third, the Spirit said, “Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief  Of course we know what the ‘example’ was - it was the unbelief and consequent fall of the fathers in Israel, concerning their [inheritance (Num. 16: 14, R.V.),] entrance and possession of Canaan.  Is it not true that multitudes within the Church, have fallen by the way?  They have left and lost both their confidence and their rejoicing in the hope of rest, which Christ has set before us.  They have done exactly what Israel did, when they came to Kadesh-Barnea; they have refused to believe, let alone to rejoice, with any sure faith in Christ’s [millennial] Reign.

 

 

Think you that God will allow Christians who mock Christ’s Second Coming; who fail utterly to have their lamps trimmed and burning; who look at the things which are seen, and not at the Blessed Hope of the Coming of Christ; who even call belief in the Coming and the Reign of Christ as false and fanatical: think you, we say, that God will allow such saints to luxuriate in His Kingdom? to hold places of honour and trust in His [Messiah’s] reign?  Never, never, so long as there is a just God in Heaven, who shall reward every man according to his works.

 

 

And who, think you, will reign with Christ?  Will it be the saint who ridiculed Him, denied His promises, who sought to be great with the present [evil] age, and world?  Think you that the world-centred believer, who like Demas forsakes the Lord, will reign?

 

 

Listen, my beloved brethren!  If we would reign, we must suffer, we must fight, we must go outside the camp and bear the reproach of Christ.  If we confess Him, He will confess us.  If we deny Him, He will deny us. Again if we suffer we shall reign.

 

 

A beautiful crown we then shall wear,

If here on earth the cross we bear.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

165

 

THE KINGDOM

OF THE THOUSAND YEARS

 

 

 

ALL of the problems that are raised by the questions concerning the Millennial Kingdom have been subjects for study by the leaders in Christian thinking since the beginning of our era.  One of those who has gathered up the results of the study of these men is Nathaniel West.  He has assembled into his volume, The Thousand Years in Both Testaments, an astounding wealth of information on the points at issue.

 

 

First of all, let us mention, though with all too much brevity, some of the characteristics of the 1,000 years, as Dr. West has tabulated them.

 

 

(1) Satan, with his evil angels, will be imprisoned in the Abyss for the 1,000 years.  His power over man and the nations will be broken (Isa. 24: 21, 22; 17: 1; Rev. 20: 1).

 

 

(2) Antichrist’s kingdom, overthrown for ever, and the kingdoms of this world with it, shall never be revived, nor antichrist and his confederates ever reappear to dwell upon the earth (Isa. 24: 21, 22; Rev. 19: 20; 20: 10).

 

 

(3) There shall be but one kingdom in that day, the Kingdom of Christ, to which all the nations of the earth shall be obedient (many references).

 

 

(4) There shall be but one religion, that of Christ.

 

 

(5) All idols shall be destroyed.

 

 

(6) All Israel shall be holy to the Lord; and this means, not the Christian Church, nor the nations, but the Jewish people as such, the natural seed of Abraham.

 

 

(7) War shall exist no more.

 

 

(8) Harmony shall be restored in creation, between man and man, and a covenant of peace be made between man and the lower animal world.

 

 

(9) The Land of Israel shall be transformed from barrenness into beauty, and made fruitful, glorious and free from plague, and populated by a happy and blessed people; the people to whom by right it belongs.

 

 

(10) Patriarchal years will return, in which a man 100 years old shall be esteemed a child (Isa. 65: 20-22).  The risen saints “neither marry nor are given in marriage” (Matt. 22: 30); but the unglorified are a “blessed seed and their offspring with them (Isa. 65: 23).

 

 

(11) Israel and Judah, or twelve-tribed Israel, shall be re-united in their own land, and be a blessing to all mankind.

 

 

(12) Jerusalem and Mount Zion, by means of physical convulsion and geological changes suddenly effected through disruption, depression, fissure and elevation, at the Lord’s appearing, shall be exalted, or “lifted high above the surrounding hills, and the adjacent region be reduced “to a plain like the Arabah, or Ghor, that runs from the slopes of Hermon to the Red Sea (Isa. 64: 14; Micah 1: 3, 4; Judges 5: 4, 5; Psalm 97: 4, 5; Ex. 19: 18, 24; Hab. 3: 6, 10; Nah. 1: 5, 6; Matt. 27: 51, 52; Isa. 40: 13; 2: 2; Mic. 4: 1; Zech. 14: 4, 5, 10, 11; Jer. 31: 38-40).

 

 

(13) The City itself shall be built again, broadened, enlarged, and adorned with the wealth of the nations, and the [New millennial] Temple made glorious by the “precious things” of mankind.

 

 

(14) The “Outcast of Israel” and the “Dispersed of Judah gathered to enter the Kingdom, will return to their fatherland from the East, the West, the North, the South, to sit down with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, conducted thither by Gentile hands, and presented as a holy Offering to the Lord Himself, revealed in His glory.

 

 

(15) Ten men, of all nations, that is, a large number - in token of their recognition of what the Lord in His glory does for the Jew in the hour of his final deliverance - will “take hold of the skirt of a Jew then honoured beyond all others, and, detaining his step, beseech his favour, as he moves to the Holy City.  The wiping away of the reproach of Israel brings the national conversion of the Gentiles, international concerts of prayer, and the concourse of men to the Throne of Jehovah - to worship before the Lord.

 

 

(16) A perennial stream of living water shall flow from the Temple Rock toward the Mediterranean and the Dead Seas, carrying life wherever it goes.

 

 

(17) A re-distribution and division of the Holy Land shall be made according to the 12 tribes of Israel.

 

 

(18) There will be a cessation of sorrow, tears and death for God’s people in that age.

 

 

(19) There will be a sevenfold fulness and increase of light, solar and lunar, in that day.

 

 

(20) There will be a restoration of Samaria, Sodom and Gomorrah, less guilty than Jerusalem, in that day, and an alliance among them all in covenant holiness, humility and knowledge of the Lord.

 

 

(21) A yearly concourse of people from all nations shall go to Jerusalem to worship.

 

 

(22) Israel shall be a priestly nation, as well as royal, in the presence of all nations, offering perpetual spiritual sacrifice to God through Jesus Christ, an example of religious devotion to the whole world.

 

 

(23) The Jewish People and their Land, long divorced and desolate, shall be remarried with grand solemnities, as a new bride to the Lord, over whom He will joy with singing, and He will rest in His love.

 

 

(24) Around the land of Israel thus glorious, and the Holy City, now the light of the world because of the glory of Christ, within it and on it, the nations of earth shall dwell in obedient and willing submission, and, blessed in Abraham’s seed, and free from Satanic domination, enjoy the Millennial age of righteousness, peace and rest.  - Prophecy.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

166

 

THE ADVENT

 

 

BY E. E. WORDSWORTH

 

 

 

SOMETHING new, startling, supernatural, divine, strikes in upon the scenes of unbridled lust, cruelty, and Reign of Terror; it is the blessed appearing of the Son of Man, of God ‑ the Ancient of Days riding triumphantly upon the clouds in great power, glory, and majesty.  It is the second manifestation of His second coming, the coming to the world to reign.  The effect of this advent is described in the sixth seal: “And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; and said to the mountains and the rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb for the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand (Rev. 6: 1517). The full power, meaning and purpose of Christ’s return will not be fully known until He appears “in the clouds with great glory  This coming will not be circumscribed by nations or continents nor the devices of wicked men.  Let us examine more closely this wonderful visible coming of our Christ.

 

 

First, He will come in like manner as He went away (Acts 1: 11). This was personal, visible, bodily, certain, awe-inspiring, glorious. There will be such consternation that kings will forget their sceptres and thrones, generals and military leaders their rank and authority, rich men their vast holdings and incalculable wealth, unscrupulous politicians their unprincipled handling of the public, industrialists their filthy lucre, offices and luxurious homes, and men of every rank and station in life will make a stampede like a panic-stricken herd of cattle for the rocks, dens, caves and hiding places of the hills and mountains to hide them from the face of Him they have despised, rejected, hated, cursed, blasphemed and spurned.

 

 

Second, Christ will come in spectacular splendour and revelation.  It will be world-wide and yet instantaneous. “For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west, so shall also the coming of the Son of Man be” (Matt. 26: 24).  Lightning travels around the world, which is twenty-five thousand miles in its circumference, seven times in one second.  So we can appreciate how it will strike terror to the hearts of men everywhere, regardless of rank or station. It is the full revelation of the power, authority, righteousness, holiness and regnant glory of the Son of Man whose right it is to reign in the earth.  He now seizes the sceptre and ascends His throne.  His administration of the earth for a thousand years is ushered in.

 

 

Third, He will come bringing His saints with Him and the holy angels.  “When the Son of Man shall come in his glory, and all His holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: and before him shall be gathered all nations  Christ will bring with Him millions of redeemed and resurrected saints, and shining angels. What a glorious spectacle!  Dwell here a moment and ponder his glorious event: the Son of the Living God blazing with heavenly glory like a noonday sun, flashing, glittering, shining; the vast hosts of God shouting heavenly praises; the archangel and the trump of God, echoing and reverberating to the very ends of the earth; Christ has come to reign.

 

 

But while it will be glorious to God, Christ, the angels, the saints, it will be an awful time of consternation, fear and anguish to sinful men.  “All the nations will mourn because of Him  When He appears in the skies, marshalling the battalions of holy beings, the falling rocks and tumbling mountains will be welcomed for “the earth shall wail because of Him  Satan will be dethroned, the Antichrist sent to the bottomless pit for a thousand years, and the False Prophet sent likewise to the same place of destiny and doom.  The millennial reign will begin and it will continue for a thousand years, and Christ will rule with “a rod of iron” that wicked men may learn that He is the moral Ruler of the universe.  “And the meek shall inherit the earth - The Midnight Cry.

 

 

-------

 

 

NERO

 

 

BY  A. G. TILNEY

 

 

 

HIS number (Rev. 13: 18) is our means of identifying the Great Wild Beast from all other boasted or fancied claimants; for several Divine clues have been given.

 

 

Clue 1: The Beast is not a system, but a man, one man.

 

 

Clue 2: He is a king, one of seven ‘contemporary’ emperors. [i.e., one who lived in and belonged to the same period]

 

 

Clue 3: He dies by a violent death, suicide or assassination, for such is the force of ‘fallen’.

 

 

Clue 4: He claims to be Divine, for he bears the names of blasphemy.  Out of all the Roman emperors, only seven fulfil the conditions so far.

 

 

Clue 5: The numerics of his name total 666, without addition or subtraction.

 

 

Clue 6: Though the 8th Emperor, he was one of the Seven, and was resurrected (Rev. 13: 18; 17: 8-11).

 

 

Wisdom consists in following the clues and totalling the number of the King’s name; it also consists in identifying the Seven-hilled City with its seven special kings, of whom one is raised from the dead.  SIX is the number of man, and EIGHT is the resurrection number, the numerics of the Resurrected or Risen Jesus Christ being 888.

 

 

In the last, but not the latest, edition of Chambers’ 20th Century Dictionary, under the heading Apocalyptic Number, we read (I quote from memory of my own ‘blitzed’ copy):- “The best interpretation ever given of this number is the name of Caesar Neron, with the letter-values taken from the Hebrew alphabet”; for it was apparently in this hidden tongue that the Revelation was originally composed.  A further confirmation is in the fact that in some MSS 666 appears as 616, which is plainly accounted for by the fact that N, with its numeric value of 50 being dropped (NERON appearing as NERO), gives precisely that figure.  Nero, of course, hated Christians and was expected by the early believers to return to fulfil this prophecy.  He will be amazed to find a nominally Christian religious organisation supporting and supported by the imperial power.  Hence he and his satellites will unite to destroy her, as foretold in Rev. 17 - the Rome that is disclosed as old-time Babylon, and that is now openly called Babylon once more (Rev. 18).  God give us wisdom and willingness to be warned ourselves, and to warn other people too, for the fateful time is at hand; at hand, too, the conquering King of kings. - The Prophecy Investigation Society.

 

 

-------

 

 

The Second Look

 

 

“I have made a covenant with mine eyes,” was Job’s statement.  And every believer needs sorely to make such a covenant!  Sights we ought not to gaze upon may come under the range of our eyes without any volition of our own.  But it is the second look that counts.  The first may be, and usually is, accidental or incidental. But the second look has in it the sin of choice.  And it is there our guilt begins.  You know what I mean.  And it is here that we are responsible, and here that our defeat is born, if we have not learned the secret of victory at this point.  There is a clear border line between things which thrust themselves upon our vision, and things which we choose to look upon.  The one is innocence; the other is sin.  So long as we are in the world we cannot escape the first.  But unless we “keep doing to death” the second we will find ourselves daily skirting the edge of the precipice of sin and final downfall.  Too many catastrophes, spiritual and moral, have come to pass here to allow any man to trifle with the lust of the eyes.  Through the open portal of the eyes the destroyer has entered into the innermost lives of thousands and hurled them from the place and path of purity into the slough of sensual sin and shameful defeat.  Make a covenant with your eyes, and, by the grace of God, “keep yourselves unspotted” from defilements that are waiting to enter by that easy route.  The appeal to the eye is the deadliest and easiest route to the soul’s undoing and the nation will some day, when it is too late, awaken in the fact that the modern movies have wrought the moral wreck and ruin of its youth.

 

- JAMES H. Mc CONKEY.

 

 

*        *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

167

 

THE IRON AND THE CLAY

 

 

BY D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

THE politics of the nations of the world to-day add a fresh, deeply-moving proof of the close approach of the Advent.  The first fact is the prevalence of iron power.  The metals of Daniel’s Image - world-empire down the ages - remarkably indicate growth in force: silver is harder than gold, and brass harder than silver; and all close in iron, “forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things; and as iron that crusheth all these, shall it break in pieces and crush  So the specific gravity of the metals is graded - of Gold, 19.3; Silver, 10.3l.; Brass, 8.5; Iron, 7.6; and the Clay, in the last stage, 1.9.  Aeroplanes in their thousands, tanks with enormous guns, bombs wiping out whole cities - all are force utterly unknown in previous ages, iron power in days immediately preceding our Lord’s return.

 

 

Revolution

 

 

But the second fact is in sharp conflict with the first.  The ten nations which compose the final world-empire are seething with political unrest, and even revolution; and every totalitarian State - iron power - is in constant danger of civil war, and of breaking up in self-destruction.  Greece is exactly a case in point which the whole world is now watching.

 

 

Division

 

 

So now we see a lightning photograph of the closing days.  “Whereas thou sawest the feet and toes” - the last stages of universal empire - “part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, it shall be a divided kingdom;* but there shall be in it the strength of the iron” - it will be mastered by military force and terrorism - “forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay” (Dan. 2: 43).  The clay in the iron will mean dangerous internal movements jeopardizing the very existence of each of the ten kingdoms - the ‘ten toes  “And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken” - brittle (R.V., margin), that is, always in danger of disintegrating.

 

* “The Hebrew for ‘divided’ always signifies unnatural or violent division arising from inner disharmony or discord” (Keil).

 

 

The Clay

 

 

For what is the clay?  “Whereas thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay” - iron mingled with brittle earthenware, easily shivered - “they” - the iron powers - “shall mingle themselves with the seed of men” - the proletariat, the political groupings of the working classes.  The Iron is a tank or machine-gun handled by trained gunners: the clay is the unarmed populace, scattering in a moment from the public squares in their thousands, as easily broken as brittle earthenware.  Seventeen centuries ago a shrewd commentator foresaw the fulfilment.  “These events says Hippolytus, “are in the future, when the ten toes of the Image will have turned out to be so many democracies

 

 

Democracies

 

 

No more wonderfully has the appearance of the clay in the iron been fulfilled than in the Orient.  “No axiom of international politics says Lord Curzon, “would have been accepted with less dispute than the belief that devotion to absolutism was so innate and deeply-rooted an institution in the East that whatever change of government it might set up, or desire, this would not take the form of representative government or democratic institutions.  The change has been enormous.  We have seen the Turks in Europe and the Persians in Asia dethroning an absolute monarch and setting up a parliamentary chamber; the Egyptians clamouring for a similar institution; the Indian Nationalists adopting as their avowed programme self-government on parliamentary lines; and above all - greatest of all wonders - China committing herself to the summoning of a Parliament

 

 

Civil War

 

 

But what is the consequence?  Two sovereignties, latently hostile, will rend every State: the sovereignty of the Throne or the Army, and the sovereignty of the People: the Iron, strength of empire, hard, destructive, autocratic; forcibly blended with the Clay, seething political groups by which the Iron is constantly checked and the State endangered.  “But they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron doth not mingle with clay”: the cleavage is irreconcilable; internal and incessant strife will demoralize the nations until the end. Doubtless it will be so even in the Empire of the Antichrist.  The Editor of The Nineteenth Century (Nov., 1944) stresses one phase of the Clay. “National Socialism is an amalgam of the two most powerful mass movements of modem mankind.  Had it not have been nationalised, it would not have commanded the pervert allegiance of men capable of leadership in a mighty revolution, and in a revolutionary war of nations.  Had it not been socialistic it would not have commanded the equally fervent allegiance of a vast multitude of men and women, boys and girls.  It is ascendant everywhere, except in the United States  So Communism, however it may disguise itself, deliberately plans revolution in every country of the world.

 

 

The Stone

 

 

So now God acts at last.  Absolute power in the hands of incorruptible goodness, and informed by adequate wisdom, is the perfection of government: God Himself assumes the Throne of the World.  “A stone was cut out without hands” - no man-created government - “which smote the image: then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold broken in pieces together, and became like the chaff of the threshing-floors  The final smashing of the Image reveals the invariable unrighteousness of all governmental forms down the ages, all varieties of human rule.  The Stone - equally a mineral, and so an empire - descends on a sudden from Heaven; it collides with the Image in sharp and smashing collision; and the entire fabric of human power disappears as chaff.  The world-powers were in title, but never in fact, universal: the coming Empire will be absolute and universal: “the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth: the God of heaven shall set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed

 

 

Theocracy

 

 

So there appears at last a Theocracy - that is, government by God.  Most remarkably it was forecast two to three thousand years ago.  Jehovah chose a single nation, over which He was to be the King, literally and in personal (though invisible) government; but Israel refused it, and asked for a human king.  “Ye said unto me, Nay, but a king shall reign over us, when the Lord your God was your king: your wickedness is great, which ye have done in the sight of the Lord, in asking you a king” (1 Sam. 12: 13, 17).  And this Theocracy uses exactly the power inherent in all government. “I will give thee the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession: thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel” (Ps. 2: 8).  “Out of his mouth proceedeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations; and he shall rule them with a rod of iron” (Rev. 19: 15).

 

 

Overcomers

 

 

Exactly such also is the destiny of the Overcomers who will reign with Christ, the Man Child “who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron” (Rev. 12: 5).  Grace ceases when judgment descends, and justice replaces mercy.  Our Lord makes it exceedingly clear to Thyatira exactly what an overcomer is, and who will share His Throne. “He that overcometh, and HE THAT KEEPETH MY WORKS UNTO THE END” - for only he is an overcomer who is Christ-like in life and character to the very end, un-backsliding, undefeated - “to him will I give authority over the nations” (Rev. 2: 26).  In the words of Archbishop Trench:- “That which will be crowned is the keeping of Christ’s works unto the end; for Christ promises here this reward, not to him who enters the list and endures for a time, but to him who, having begun well, continues striving lawfully to the last ‘to him will I give power over the nations’

 

 

Righteousness

 

 

And that power will be inflexible justice.  “And he shall rule them with a rod of iron, AS THE VESSELS OF THE POTTER ARE BROKEN TO SHIVERS; as I also have received of my Father  But it will not be terrorism.  “The breaking will be benevolent: it will be the power of holiness, destroying those who would overthrow the world’s happiness.  Our patience is not to be for ever, nor is power for ever to be dissevered from righteousness.  When our Lord’s attitude changes, so does ours” (Govett).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

168

 

THE ISSUES OF CHRISTIANITY

FOR TIME AND ETERNITY

 

 

BY THOS. DURRANT

 

 

“Mr. Durrant, troubled by the Anvil Series of the B.B.C., would give to doubting hearts the golden truth he himself has experienced.  We deeply hope it will enter some harassed heart” -  D. M. Panton.

 

 

-------

 

 

 

WRITE with a view of blessing to any enquiring or anxious soul lost in the babel of confusion and voices around us.  Have we any sure guide or standard upon which everything can be tested?

 

 

The answer is in the Holy Scriptures, inspired, God-breathed and which transcend all human reason.  They are as high above ordinary literature as the Sun above all artificial lights. “For as the Heavens are, high above the earth, so are my thoughts higher than your thoughts and my ways than your ways

 

 

One is well aware of the criticism and scorn levelled at these Holy writings for centuries.  Would not to presume such prove that man claimed to be the greater and competent to judge?  The Lord anticipates such an attitude.  “You say you see, therefore your sin remains  Again “If any man will do His will he shall know (John 7: 17).  To be intellectually instructed and yet ignore the moral state of sin, unbelief and death of men generally, is a very serious position to be in, and may be a grievous stumbling block to weaker minds.  While recognising the part of the more wicked and Godless nations, the present state of chaos has been greatly caused by sin and departure from God, by love of money, pleasure, and material things, which become idols. What gratitude or response is there to the Creator to whom we owe everything?

 

 

When we come to redemption, the Lord Jesus Christ by His sinless and perfect sacrifice, has paid the price for the whole world.  However, to get the benefit, man being a reasoning, intelligent and morally responsible creature, must come into line with God by the obedience of faith and submission of his heart and will. Love cannot be forced, and there is no regimenting or destruction of initiative by God; but beautiful harmony, where one can go on to say with the Apostle Paul, “The Son of God who loved me and gave Himself for me

 

 

Moral issues have to be settled, and they have been settled at Calvary’s Gross by an all-wise God of infinite power and love.  If it is objected that such a settlement appears weak (in man’s quest for power) or foolish (in search for wisdom), it is answered by the same Apostle: The ‘weakness of God’ (in Calvary’s Cross) is stronger than all men put together, and ‘the foolishness of God’ (in that transaction) wiser than the sum total of man’s wisdom.

 

 

Science, falsely so-called, cannot deal with such issues; it only enables man to sin more, and cannot deliver from death while it is hurrying thousands, yea millions, into the grave.  Science is merely an abstraction under which name man worships himself.  We worship really what we are supremely occupied with; so that in meeting together, true Christians express their worship, which must be “In spirit and truth  No other is of any avail, and it is not a question of empty forms and ceremonies.  The Son of God, declared so by resurrection power, opens up the wonders of Eternity to every believing heart.  Christianity proper is concerned with the revelation of God and Eternal Life, and has not to do with the present evil world, while there have been many incidental effects and blessings.

 

 

The millennial reign of Christ, which is but the doorway to the New Heavens and the New Earth, appears on the horizon.  Should not we expect a holy and mighty God to have wonderful purposes of His. own? and therefore intervention is inevitable sooner or later.  Are sin and shame to have their sway in His fair earth for ever?  We cannot suppose millions of worlds were created for nothing.  There is a glorious and supreme place for the true Church in Eternity; for Christ loved it, ministers now world-wide to it, and will “present it to Himself a glorious Church, having neither spot nor wrinkle nor any such thing  Israel will have the earthly place promised to her.

 

 

I am well aware of schools of religious thought, which, while taking a little Christian morality or even partially preaching Christ as Saviour, shut their eyes to, or explain away, the teaching and tremendous implications of  the Scriptures on the coming Eternity with both its judgments and glories.  They must either refuse to believe the Holy Scriptures, or handle them deceitfully, in trying to connect or limit the glory of God to this present world, or course of things.  Hundreds of prophetic scriptures concern Christ’s glory, and only a part have been fulfilled; the remainder await His return in manifested power, the first step being the Rapture of the Saints and their translation, death being swallowed up in victory (1. Thess. 4. & 1 Cor. 15.)

 

 

May one earnestly appeal that the reader will not be guilty of the sin of indifference to Christ and unbelief of the Holy One who cannot lie.  It is possible to live an outwardly respectable life and yet leave God out; and such will be shut out eternally.  “He that believeth not shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him  In contrast, the Holy Scriptures do not close till the invitation has been given: “Whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely  What an offer of a part in the Holy City having the Glory of God and in which the Throne of God (Creation) and the Lamb (Redemption) are supreme!  “This is the life eternal that they might know Thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom Thou has sent”, and the humble believer may commence this knowledge now.  One does not write for controversy.

 

 

-------

 

 

Prayer

 

 

Nevertheless, equally beautiful is this invocation of the soul of England, privately printed in 1899 by Henry, Earl Percy, Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, under the title - “Because the King putteth his trust in Thee

 

 

The God of battles give to thee

Hearts whiter than the foam

On the tossing crest of the azure sea,

That rounds thine island home.

 

 

And, firm within, may’st thou defy

The storms’ recurring shocks,

With faith more clear than summer sky

And stronger than thy rocks.

 

 

And it may be that thou alone

Wilt one day rise, and claim

That thou, on thine imperial throne,

Hast not denied His Name.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

169

 

MIRACULOUS GIFTS

 

 

BY D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

AS the Age closes, few truths are more vitally important than all that God has said on the coming open battle of miracle between Heaven and Hell, and our preparation for this last conflict; and we do well to take a rapid, bird’s-eye view of all the facts, as related in history and as perfected in prophecy.  There is perhaps no subject on which evangelical believers are more un-scriptural, though utterly unconsciously so; and the great Conventions, with the admirable aim of a deeper sanctity, use language on the ‘baptism’ and the ‘filling’ of the Spirit which gravely obscures the original miraculous nature of the Church, and the coming miracles of God.  The result is mental twilight.  The miraculous design in the Church has been ignored and dismissed; or else, discerning the error, a graver danger has been fallen into demonic miracles have been welcomed in the belief that they are Divine.* We need not remind our readers of the fact of unutterable gravity that an official Commission of the Church of England has reported in favour of Spiritualism, though the Report has not been published.

 

* The Montanists in the second century, the Camisards in the eighteenth century, the Irvingites in the nineteenth century, and the Petecostalists in this century - all have had among them true and devoted Christians, and all have had ‘gifts of tongues’; but none have miracles greater than, or different in kind from, the supernatural in the great demon movements of history - Witchcraft, Spiritualism, and Theosophy.

 

 

Pentecost

 

 

The bedrock underlying all is the presence of a Person of the Godhead on the earth.  Christ had foretold it.  “When the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, he shall bear witness of me” (John 15: 26); “if I go, I will send him unto you” (16: 7).  The gathered Apostles witnessed the arrival.  “Suddenly there came from heaven a sound as of the rushing of a mighty wind, and it filled the house where they were sitting.  And there appeared unto them tongues parting asunder, like as of fire; and it sat upon each one of them” (Acts 2: 2).  The Holy Spirit, having thus arrived at Pentecost, remains, carrying out the whole work of God on earth for two thousand years, until, with the first rapt, He returns to Heaven.

 

 

The Baptism of the Spirit

 

 

This arrival of the Holy Ghost involved what is called ‘the baptism of the Spirit’.  Our Lord foretold it.  He charged the assembled Apostles to “wait for the promise of the Father; for John indeed baptized with water, but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence” (Acts 1: 4).  This ‘baptism’ is a ‘filling’: so we read at Pentecost, “They were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance” (Acts 2: 4).  Totally distinct from the ‘birth’ of the Spirit, or regeneration, which is internal and invisible, this baptism or filling is an ‘on-fall’, or immersion, of the Holy Ghost, falling upon the man, and always producing miracles.  “The Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word, because on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost; for they heard them speak with tongues” - here was the proof - “and glorify God” (Acts 10: 44).  There is no record of the baptism or filling of the Spirit which was not accompanied by miracles: where there are no ‘signs’ there is no proof that the Spirit has fallen: the baptism is a ‘manifestation’ of the Spirit (1 Cor. 15: 7) - that is, the Spirit’s presence made visible and audible to the senses.  This miraculous working of the Holy Spirit was but a fulfilment of our Lord’s words:- “These signs shall follow them that believe: in my name shall they cast out devils: they shall speak with new tongues: they shall take up serpents, and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall in no wise hurt them:- “they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover” (Mark 16:  17).

 

 

The Miracle-endowed Church

 

 

The consequence of the baptism in the Spirit was a supernatural Church, endowed with miraculous orders and gifts.  “God hath set some in the church” - with no hint whatever that it would be for only two hundred out of two thousand years - “first apostles, secondly prophets, thirdly teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, divers kinds of tongues” (1 Cor. 12: 28).  Miraculous gifts were distributed throughout the assemblies.  “To each one is given the manifestation of the Spirit to profit withal.  For to one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom; and to another the word of knowledge, according to the same Spirit; and to another gifts of healings, in the one Spirit; and to another workings of miracles; and to another prophecy; and to another discernings of spirits; and to another divers kinds of tongues; and to another the interpretation of tongues” (1 Cor. 12: 8).  Thus we face the inexplicable fact that for at least eighteen centuries the Church has been devoid of all miracles; and this can hardly have been the Divine plan for it is elsewhere explicitly stated, - “gifts and the calling of God are without repentance” (Rom. 11: 29); that is, His gifts may cease to operate, but it is not that He withdraws them.

 

 

Tests

 

 

But just here is slipped, in a warning that is critical and vital.  Miracle is not confined to God: “our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places” (Eph. 6: 12).  Spiritualism itself at first put forward a claim to be Pentecost.* Even Antichrist will work “all signs and wonders” (2 Thess. 2: 9).  Therefore, most strikingly, one of the nine miraculous gifts is the ‘discerning of spirits’: that is, the power to detect, supernaturally, whether a spirit communicating is good or evil.  With all the other miraculous gifts, this discerning power has disappeared; but by the mercy of God two infallible tests are put into our uninspired hands - tests which appear to be unknown to the modern Church. (1) There is a test for the spirit.  “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits, whether they be of God.  Every spirit that confesseth” - in answer to the challenge - “that JESUS CHRIST IS COME IN THE FLESH is of God” (1 John 4: 1).  The reply to the challenge must be given by the spirit, not by the person on whom he has fallen. (2) A second test is for the inspired.  “Now concerning the inspired,** brethren, I would not have you ignorant.  No man speaking in the Spirit of God” - that is, no inspired man - “saith, Jesus is anathema; and no man [inspired] can say JESUS is LORD, but in the Holy Spirit” (1 Cor. 12: 1).  All untested spirits must be utterly avoided.  The great apostasy from the Church itself, by millions of Christians, is to be based on direct intercourse with ‘seducing’ spirits (1 Tim. 4: 1).

 

* See R. D. Owen’s Debatable Land Between This World and the Next.

 

** The word that follows - “no man speaking” proves that pneumatikon refers to inspired men, not inspired gifts: the speaker must say, “Jesus is Lordwhile provably under inspiration.

 

 

The Coming Outpour

 

 

The dispensation of the Church disappears, and the Holy Spirit, having returned to Heaven with the watchful (2 Thess. 2: 6), is in a position to be ‘out-poured’ once more, when “the seven Spirits of God [shall be] sent forth into all the earth”. (Rev. 6: 5) * Pentecost is to be repeated, for the prophecy of the last outpour is quoted as having an earlier fulfilment in Pentecost.  “This is that which hath been spoken by the prophet Joel: And it shall be in the last days saith God, I will pour forth my Spirit upon all flesh” - all without distinction, not all without exception; “and your sons and your daughters shall prophecy: before the day of the Lord come” (Acts 2: 16).  “The sending forth of the seven Spirits of God into all the earth is a full restoration of the entire ministry of the Holy Ghost.  These seven Spirits of God are to be sent forth into all the earth: from this we see the coming of the great latter rain out-flowing of the Holy Spirit which will restore the prophetic vision and bring about such a transformation in the ways and means of preaching that thousands of people, filled with the Spirit, will ‘prophesy’; that is, they will preach by direct inspiration; not only forth telling by the power of the Holy Spirit, but also fore-telling events to come.  Can we not see how this will be in the order of God as the last warning and instruction just before His awful judgments are to fall on the world?  Therefore we can surely look right ahead for the greatest out-flowing of the Holy Ghost the world has ever known” (W. C. Moore).  In the words of Lange:- “When the waves of the last agony of a submerging world break, yet once more, and louder than ever, goes forth the call of a vast and infinite compassion

 

* The Holy Spirit could not now be sent into all the earth, for He is there at this moment: this proves that His coming temporary departure from earth (2 Thess. 2: 7) is a fact.

 

 

Millennial Gifts

 

 

All closes with a wonderful revelation: namely, that the coming [Messianic] Kingdom of the Lord on earth will be one of miraculous gifts lasting throughout the thousand years.  A single phrase proves it: “THE POWERS OF THE AGE TO COME” (Heb. 6: 5): so characteristic are miracles of the coming Kingdom, so fully then in evidence, that they are the powers of the Age to Come.  Their operation is not described; but the works of the Two Witnesses, who have “power to shut the heaven; and they have power over the waters to turn them into blood, and to smite the earth with every plague” (Rev. 11: 6), reveal them.

 

 

The Bible

 

 

One fact of enormous importance springs out of the original nature of the Church as God planned and made it. The Bible was born in an inspired Church.  In assemblies where “men spake from God, being moved by the Holy Ghost” (2 Pet. 1: 21), the exact, God-given books of the Old Testament were finally determined, and all man-made apocrypha excluded; and the fresh inspirations that compose the New Testament were added, and closed: that is, we were given, for these two thousand years, the mind of God, revealed directly and infallibly and for ever.

 

 

-------

 

 

CROWNS OFFERED

TO THOSE WHO QUALIFY*

 

[* A suggested title for the following. - Ed.]

 

 

 

What child of God would not desire to win a crown?  But crowns are not for mere show but for merit, as the King has been pleased to promise to those who are faithful in service.  Eternal life comes through faith in Christ, but rewards are for faithfulness.  The man in the parable who faithfully used his ten talents was rewarded with rule over ten cities.  Yet the talents were given him and the opportunity was a gift from God.  All rewards will be by grace in the end, yet the measure of each reward, the glory conferred on each of His redeemed, will be according to diligence and faithfulness in the use of the talents bestowed.  One there was who said, “The Son of man hath not where to lay his head  He went about doing good and gave his life for the lost, and later it was written of him, “having on his head a golden crown” (Rev. 14: 14), and later still, “on his head were many crowns” (Rev. 19: 12).  He won his Kingdom and his crowns by supreme merit, by obedience even unto death.  He was born a king, yet had to win his Kingdom by toil and sacrifice.  Are we better than he?

 

 

What a call Christ gives to men to be diligent and faithful in such days as these!  The world is unspeakably needy.  Hearts are weary and worn and full of unutterable longing.  Darkness deepens over the face of the nations and men grow hopeless in their helplessness.  Philosophers and statesmen know not how to relieve the gathering gloom.  One conference of the nations after another only stresses more grimly the vanity of human counsel.  Through the darkness and across the ages comes a voice, “Occupy till I come  He who was diligent unto the end and faithful in the very hour of death speaks in thunder tones to his chosen, “Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life” (Rev. 2: 10). - Anonymous.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

170

 

THE OUTLOOK OF THE HOUR

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

 

TWO BOOKLETS - His Personal Return and The Hour and the Man by T. M. Bamber.

 

 

Mr. Bamber puts on record his keen and devoted testimony to the Lord’s return.  His own experience of the refusal of the Second Adv      ent by the Church as a whole is pathetic. “One is truly conscious of a deep heart-break.  I was brought up in a Baptist church, trained for the Baptist ministry, and amongst those of the Baptist faith and order I find spiritual accord, yet everywhere I go I am conscious that in the majority of Baptist churches Second Adventism is taboo.  Any man who believes press it in denominational circles.  If our colleges refer to the subject of His glorious appearing, it is to treat it as some treat their poor relatives, or else to deny its truth altogether. For lack of this teaching in our churches in the power of the Spirit our congregations are being starved and our chapels are emptying

 

 

-------

 

 

Threatenings.  Be on your guard against the tendency of this generation, to paste a bit of blank paper over all the threatenings of the Bible. - ALEXANDER MACLAREN, D. D.

 

 

Advent.  The Papacy has now committed itself on the Second Advent.  The Holy Office has in recent years been pressed on the subject, and on July 21, 1944 the Pope issued a decree (Universe, July 28, 1944) forbidding our Lord’s visible reign on earth before the Last judgment to be taught. “Catholics,” says The Catholic Encyclopedia Dictionary, “take the thousand years reign of Christ as His spiritual reign in the Church on earth

 

 

Early Church.  The dawn, of the Church knew no other truth than a returning Christ.  Dr. Grattan Guinness writes:- “It cannot be denied that for three centuries the Church held the doctrine of the pre-millennial coming of Christ.  I think I have gone through all the writings of the Fathers for three centuries pretty carefully, and I do not know an exception unless it be Origen, the only early writer who was often heterodox

 

 

Leaders.  So later spiritual leaders of the Church have held the torch aloft.  Wickliffe, ‘the morning star of the Reformation,’ said:- “I look for no intervening period of millennial blessedness to occur prior to the second advent of Christ, but instead regard the Redeemer’s appearing as an Object of Hope, and the constant expectation of the Church  So Calvin:- “It must be held as a first principle that ever since the appearing of Christ there is nothing left to the faithful but with wakeful minds to be always ready intent on His Second Advent  So Latimer:- “I believe that the Lord Jesus may come in my day, old as I am  So John Knox:- “We know that He will return, and that with expedition  And Luther:- “I ardently hope that amidst these internal dissensions on earth, Jesus Christ will hasten the day of His coming

 

 

Values.  Lord Stamp, one of the greatest authorities on finance, shortly before his death by a German bomb closed a wireless utterance on the gold standard with these words:- “Before I finish I should like to say one other thing, and it is this: I have not the smallest interest in what I have been talking about to-night, - not the slightest interest whatever in this or any other scale of values, excepting that other scale of values introduced into this planet by Jesus of Nazareth.  That is the one and only scale of values which ultimately matters and which no man now listening to my voice can ever afford to ignore on peril of his soul.  Good-night everybody

 

 

Wellhausen.   It is little wonder that Wellhausen, the founder of the Higher Criticism, ultimately abandoned his Christian professorship for a professorship that involved no teaching of Christianity.  Dr. Robertson Nicoll (Life, p. 41) tells of an interview he had with him.  “Wellhausen said that, while he did not deny that miracles are possible, there was no historical proof of them.  I asked him what he thought of the testimony of Christ.  He replied that no doubt Christ was mistaken about the Old Testament, but that, as He did not understand about the earth and the sun, so He did not about the Bible, and it mattered little.  I said that the natural effect of such views was to shake the place of the Bible in people’s minds, to which he replied that he was pressed by this difficulty - that he did not see any way out of it

 

 

Criticism.   A correspondent in The Guardian (July 28, l944) stresses the bankruptcy of the Higher Criticism. “I am surprised to see a reviewer in The Guardian accepting the fable of a Second Isaiah.  Does he equally accept the fable of a Maccabean date for Daniel, admittedly impossible to the International Critical Commentary; to Sayce, who wrote to me in September, 1929, that ‘the Higher Criticism’ was ‘now bankrupt’; even to Driver, who yielded to the new evidence?  The disproof of Isaiah’s second portion is twofold: (1) T. K. Cheyne in 1880 published a Commentary on Isaiah for the first time embodying contemporary Assyrian. Eager to prove a Second Isaiah, he honourably admitted that the text was against him; so he re-wrote Isaiah in his own Hebrew under the title of The Mines of Isaiah Re-examined. This book Driver pronounced ‘great rubbish.’”

 

 

Spiritualism.  The danger of Spiritualism is constantly admitted by the ablest Spiritualists - a difficult fact to explain if it were merely intercourse with the dead.  Robert Dale Owen, the foremost early British Spiritualist, says (Footfalls on the Boundary of Another World, p. 177):- “No one, though actuated by the purest motives, can abandon himself to the influences from the next world, exclusively and throughout a long term of years, without risk of serious injury

 

 

Lincoln.  The danger of even Christians contacting spirits is tremendous in these world-wars.  In the American Civil War even so godly a statesman as Abraham Lincoln had a medium (Nettie C. Coburn) in residence at the White House, where she gave daily sιances to the President and members of the Cabinet.  Spirit intercourse (or sorcery) while not among the excommunicating sins (1 Cor. 5: 11), excludes from the coming Kingdom (Gal. 5: 20)

 

 

Youth.  The Juvenile judge of Nashville, U.S.A., records (Religious Digest, May, 1944) that from 1939 to 1943 he tried approximately 4,000 cases under 17 years of age: of these only 17 were regular Sunday School or Church attendants; and of the 17 nine were not guilty.  “We have neverJudge Gillian says, “had an active church boy in real trouble in the juvenile Court

 

 

Churches.  Such is the enormous effect of churches on national life.  A Prime Minister of England, Mr. Lloyd George, puts it thus:- “We sometimes look around us to find the secret of our great British Empire, and of our great British civilisation, and I want to say to you that the secret is not to be found in our great universities, splendid though they are.  It is not to be found in our great charitable institutions, as much as they have figured in our life.  It is not to be found in the House of Commons, nor in the House of Lords, as much as has been done there for the well-being of our people

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

171

 

OPPOSITION

 

 

BY W. C. MOORE

 

 

 

E. E. Shelhamer says: “Hard as it is on human nature, yet I thank God for all the criticism and ostracism which has come my way.  Many times I have been so crushed that for the time being hallelujahs were rather faint, but through grace I was enabled to keep smiling.  Though they came from high and low, I did not receive one blow too many.  True, some of them were uncalled for, some were unkind, but God graciously turned them to my account and they have broadened and enriched my soul.

 

 

“When I was penniless and friendless, I had to take everything.  Later, when God smiled upon and gave me more or less recognition then came the subtle temptation that has ruined more than one man: ‘You have suffered enough; you have some rights and it is beneath your dignity to silently bear these unjust misrepresentations.’  Thank God I did not yield!  Many a man has gone down, after years of climbing to a place of influence and power, simply because he could not take in a magnanimous and Christ-like manner toward everything that came against him.  Then he began to pull off in spirit from his brethren, especially those who had the courage to tell him his faults or inconsistencies.  Next he was like a ship on the high seas without compass or rudder.  And lastly, he was either a shipwreck, or worse, a floating derelict.  God help us!

 

 

“When we get to the judgment we may find that misunderstandings and ill‑usages have played a greater part in keeping us humble and getting us safely through to the skies, than anything else except the Blood of Christ.”

 

 

Instead of getting upset or riled by opposition and criticism; we should thank God for it.  “In everything give thanks” (1 Thess. 5: 18).  Jesus says, “Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for their’s is the kingdom of heaven.  Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for My sake.  Rejoice, and be exceeding glad; for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you” (Matt. 5: 10-12).

 

 

“Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you” (Matt. 5: 44).  Pray for them - not against them.  On the cross Jesus said, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do

 

 

We often lose our testimony by defending ourselves.  When we “fight back” - our actions speak so loud that people cannot hear what we say.  Love seeketh not her own - not her own reputation, not her own way (1 Cor. 13: 5) “Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.  Recompense to no man evil for evil.  Avenge not yourselves ... Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good” (Rom. 12: 14, 17, 19, 21).  Take every affront, every insult, every injustice done to you - as a God-given opportunity for manifesting the love of Christ - thus following Jesus, thus representing Him, “Who, when He was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, He threatened not” (1 Pet. 2: 23).

 

 

God blessed the evangelistic ministry of Chas. G. Finney in a very remarkable way for many years, - and, of course, he met opposition.  In the midst of it God helped him, and he says:- “I said nothing publicly, or as I recollect privately, to anybody on the subject (of the opposition); but gave myself to prayer.  I looked to God with great earnestness day after day, to be directed; asking Him to show me the path of duty, and give me grace to ride out the storm.

 

 

“After a season of great humiliation before Him, there came a great lifting up.  God assured me that He would be with me and uphold me; that no opposition should prevail against me; that I had nothing to do, in regard to all this matter, but to keep about my work, and wait for the salvation of God.

 

 

“The sense of God’s presence, and all that passed between God and my soul at that time, I can never describe. It led me to be perfectly trustful, perfectly calm, and to have nothing but the most perfectly kind feeling toward all the brethren that were misled, and were arraying themselves against me.  I felt assured that all would come out right; that my true course was to leave everything to God, and to keep about my work; and as the storm gathered and the opposition increased, I never for one moment doubted how it would result.

 

 

“The Lord did not allow me to lay the opposition to heart; and I can truly say, so far as I can recollect, I never had an unkind feeling toward Mr. - or Dr. -, or any leading opposer of the work, during the whole of their opposition. The Lord soon revived His work.  The revival soon took effect among the people, and became powerful.”

 

 

“For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully.  For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God” (1 Peter 2: 19-20).  “God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble” (Jas. 4: 6).  May the Lord help me, and each hungry child of God, in these closing, testing days - to humble ourselves as never before under the mighty hand of God, that He may exalt us in due time (1 Peter 5: 6) for His glory!

 

- Herald of His Coming.

 

 

--------

 

 

Golden Age

 

 

Few realize the dynamic tonic for the world in the golden age of a Second Advent, and for the Church in a Millennial Kingdom, a prize only stormed by force.  “Quite apart from any question of theology,” says Professor Richard G. Moulton, of Chicago University, “it may be said that no more precious legacy of thought has come down to us than this Hebrew conception of a golden age to come.  It is difficult to over estimate the bracing moral influences of an ideal future.  The classic thought of Greece and Rome took an opposite course: their age of gold was in the remote past, the progress of time was a decline, and the riches of philosophy claimed to be no more than a precarious salvage.  The result was the moral paralysis of fatalism, or at best individualism.  The imaginative pictures of biblical prophecy inspire spiritual energy by bringing a future to work for, and, on the other hand, the weakness of a luxurious optimism is avoided in the writings of an author who, while he puts forth all his powers to exalt the future, insists always that the only way of entrance to this future is the forcible purging out of evil  Our Golden Age is no mere gift of grace. “The kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, AND MEN OF VIOLENCE TAKE IT BY FORCE” (Matt. 11: 12).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

172

 

THE OLIVE TREE

 

 

BY  D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

THE hatred of the Jew, resulting in the bloodiest persecution of a race ever known in the history of the world, is countered by a momentous utterance of our Lord:- “Salvation is from the Jews” (John 4: 22).  For two thousand years all salvation centred in Israel; and though themselves cast off for another two thousand years, “if the casting away of them is the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead (Rom. 11: 15).  Israel is the axis of salvation.

 

 

The Olive

 

 

The Most High has pictured all salvation down the ages since Abraham, the ‘father’ of all the faithful, as an Olive Tree.  Oil is ever the symbol of the Holy Ghost, and the saved of all generations are the embodiment of the Holy Spirit; and so the olive tree stands for a man of God, “I am like a green olive tree in the house of God” (Ps. 52: 8). No tree is more closely connected with the history of mankind than the olive.  The first foliage named in the Bible is the olive-leaf taken by a dove into the Ark out of the whole world; it is an ever-green, for God’s life-stock never dies;* and it is from the Mount of Olives, at our Lord’s return, that salvation - God's olive-oil - covers the whole earth.  The Olive is God’s life-stock into which, for four thousand years, every soul must be engrafted that is to be saved.

 

* The longevity of the olive singularly illustrates the truth for which Jehovah selects it.  There are olive trees now in the Garden of Gethsemane, the oldest of which (according to the monks in charge) may have been seen by our Lord when on earth.

 

 

Israel

 

 

Now we see the extraordinary function of the Jew.  All salvation from Abraham to the return of Christ God has concentrated into one life-stock - the House of Israel.  To us saved Gentiles He says:- “Thou wast cut out of that which is by nature a wild olive tree, and wast grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree” (Rom. 11: 24).  The whole of the authors of the Bible were Jews; the sole Root of salvation Himself, when He came, was a Jew; the Oil of the Olive flowed out into all lands from an upper room in Jerusalem; and the salvation of the world, when it comes, will be the work of the Jew.  For the Saviour Himself is the Root of the Olive.  “I am the root of David,” Jesus says (Rev. 22: 16); “and it shall come to pass in that day that the root of Jesse, which standeth for an ensign of the peoples, unto Him shall the nations seek” (Is. 11: 10).

 

 

Broken Branches

 

 

Now we see the terrible crisis of Israel.  “Some of the branches were broken off, and thou, being a wild olive, wast grafted in among them” (ver. 17).  Some of the branches were broken off, not all: three thousand Jews at Pentecost confessed Christ; a great company of the priests believed (Acts 6: 7); and at least half a million Jews to-day are in the life-stock; and a Hebrew Christian has pointed out that more Jews have been converted in the last few decades than were converted throughout seventeen centuries after Paul. “A Christian,” said Lord Beaconsfield, the foremost Jew in England in the nineteenth century, “is a completed Jew

 

 

Jew-Hate

 

 

So now the profound cure of Jew-hate emerges.  “If thou, being a wild-olive, didst become partaker with them of the root of the fatness of the olive tree, glory not over the branches  Mr. Claude Monteflore, an outstanding Jew, has said:- “If Christendom abandons the folly and the wickedness of anti-Semitism, Jewry will be willing to think more accurately and more wisely about the founders and sacred books of Christianity.” The marvel of the ages is not the salvation of the Jew, but the salvation of the Gentile: a ‘wild olive’ - a tree outside the Garden of God; not by nature in the life-stock: “sinners of the Gentiles and “aliens from the commonwealth of Israel”  - “thou was grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree  God’s love never rested on our fathers; since the offering of the Passover Lamb, the divine sacrifices have never been offered by Gentile hands; no national promise bound the hands of God to any nation but the Jew: yet mercy broke all bounds, love overflowed its banks, and God’s saving health was known among all nations.  So far from hating the Jew, whenever we see a Jew, we see the living miracle of our salvation.  The Jew is God’s primal choice, I am only His incidental choice; and though God’s choice of me is from eternity, yet I am humbled for ever by knowing that only by the Jew’s death am I saved.

 

 

Faith

 

 

Next is revealed the crux in the destiny of all nations.  Faith alone is the miracle which brings us into the life-stock of God.  “By their unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by thy faith  The Jew is our greatest object-lesson in the world.  Whenever we see a Jew, we see a dead branch from the oldest stock of salvation in the world, a life-stock that once throbbed close to the heart of God.  That a Jew, saturated with one half of the Bible, and with a knowledge of Jehovah for thousands of years, should be saved is a far less wonderful thing than that I should be saved - a Godless, hopeless alien of the Gentiles.  “As touching the gospel, they were enemies for your sake: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father’s sake  Israel Zangwill uttered these inexpressibly solemn words:- “Had Christians handled us with Christliness, there would not be a single Jew in Europe  “For he is not a Jew whose circumcision is of the heart” (Rom. 2: 28).

 

 

A Warning

 

 

So the situation carries one of the most solemn warnings in the, Bible.  “Behold then the goodness and severity of God: toward them that fell severity but toward thee, God’s goodness, if thou continue in his goodness otherwise thou also shalt be cut off  What the ‘cutting off’ is at this moment the Chief Rabbi, Dr. Hertz, reveals: 75 per cent. of the Jews of Europe have been annihilated in “the ineffable horror of an appalling martyrdom  Whenever we see a Jew, we see a warning to the Church of two thousand years: as Bishop Moule says, - “Let us put no pillow of theory between the sharpness of that warning and our souls  The bankruptcy of faith will bring to the Church the doom it brought to Israel.

 

 

Restoration

 

 

So we see the final crisis of the Olive Tree.  The world is yet to see the grafting in again of the whole of the severed branches.  “They also, if they continue not in their unbelief, shall be grafted in; for God is able to graft them in again: how much more shall these, which are the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree? And so all Israel shall be saved  The severed branches are still dead: they invited the Lord’s blood upon their heads, not upon their hearts; and the awful load is sinking the dead branches into the Fire: but when restored they will be grafted back, not into us, but into their own Olive.  It is expressed in extraordinary words from the Godhead, surely unique in Scripture:- “Yes, I will rejoice over them to do them good, and I will plant them in this land assuredly with my whole heart and with my whole soul” (Jer. 32: 41).  When God can say such a thing, no surer proof of its coming to pass is conceivable.

 

 

Crisis

 

 

The final crisis will reveal its Messiah to Israel.  As the Church begins to stream towards apostasy, Israel begins to stream back to Jehovah: it is the vast cross-current of grace in the last days.  The ancient Christian beheld the lifeless Jew: the modern Jew will behold the lifeless Christian.  The crisis is at hand.  A writer says:- “I had a remarkable experience recently when travelling with an orthodox Jew.  We were together in the same cabin, and, as my custom is, I knelt at my berth-side night and morning to pray.  I soon found out that this Jew, in the upper berth, watched with keen interest my reading of the Scriptures.  When Sunday came I would no longer play deck games with him, but otherwise we were on very friendly terms.  On Sunday, when we were walking together up and down the deck, I at last reached the subject of the Rapture.  In full detail I gave him the programme as I understood it, Scripturally, to be.  All of a sudden he turned and faced me, and with his finger pointing, he said: - ‘If that event takes place as you said, we shall know that you folks are right and we Jews are wrong, and that will create a cataclysm in our midst.’  In other words, he admitted that the moment the Rapture takes place the Jews will have the proof that they were wrong in their position and the Christians were right, and it will immediately cause them to admit that Jesus Christ was their promised Messiah whom they had failed to recognize as such  Then the river of life will reverse in a sharp bend, leaving the Genlile nations lifeless, and starting to fulfil Jehovah’s word for Israel, “I will be as the dew unto Israel: his branches shall spread, and his beauty shall be as the Olive tree, and his smell as Lebanon” (Hos. 14: 6).

 

 

-------

 

 

HOW WILL ISRAEL BE RESTORED?

 

 

By the promises are insured to Israel -

 

 

1.  A fertile land.  Isaiah 55: 13, Jeremiah 31: 5; Joel 3: 18 and Amos 9: 13.

 

 

2.  Seasonable rains. Ezekiel 34: 26 & Joel. 2: 23.

 

 

3.  Well built cities.  Isaiah 61: 4.

 

 

4.  Fixity of land tenure and security of real estate.  Isaiah 65: 21, 22.

 

 

5.  A numerous population.  Isaiah 49: 19, 20, Ezekiel 36: 37, 38 and Zechariah 2: 4.

 

 

6.  Just magistrates.  Isaiah 60: 17.

 

 

7.  A charter of personal liberty.  Jeremiah 30: 8.

 

 

8.  Popular education.  Isaiah 54: 13.

 

 

9.  Wealth and plenty.  Isaiah 54: 11, 12; 60: 5, 11; Jeremiah 33: 12, 13 and Joel 2: 26.

 

 

10.  Absence of seditious elements.  Ezekiel 20: 28.

 

 

11.  Undisputed supremacy amongst the nations.  Micah 5: 8.

 

 

12. A glorious theocracy.  Isaiah 24: 23.

 

 

What an ideal state of national politics is here described!  And this is all involved in the hope of the promises. Further, the fulfilment of the promises will bring to Israel twelve clearly defined features of spiritual blessing, all of them found in the third chapter of the prophecy of Zephaniah.

 

 

FOR THEY WILL BE:

 

 

a.  Verse 9: A united people

 

 

b.  Verse 1l: A truly humble people.

 

 

c.  Verse 12: A consciously dependent people.

 

d.  Verse 12: A people confident in God.

 

e.  Verse 13: A truthful people.

 

 

f. Verse 13: A fearless people.

 

 

g. Verse 14: A joyful people.

 

h.  Verse 15: A people among whom God resides.

 

 

i.  Verse 15: A people secure from calamity.

 

 

j.  Verse 16: A zealously active people.

 

 

k.  Verse 17: A people in whom God delights.

 

 

l.  Verses 11 & 20:  An object-lesson to the whole world of the abounding grace of God.

 

 

These conditions, national, political and spiritual, will result from the fulfilment of the promises.  They will be realized only in the land, after the full restoration of the people and occupation of the land has come to pass. This restoration is assured by definite promise.

 

 

THAT IT IS FUTURE AND LITERAL,

IS PROVED BY SEVEN CONSIDERATIONS:

 

 

I.  There is to be a restoration “a second time”.  Isaiah 11: 11.  There having been but one restoration in history, the second restoration must be future.

 

 

II.  There is to be a restoration from the four corners of the earth.  Isaiah 11: 11, 12.  No such restoration having taken place in history, it must be future.

 

 

III.  The whole land of promise is to be possessed.  Genesis 15: 18 and Obadiah 5, 17.  There having been no entire possession of the whole of the promised land in history, there must be a literal and future restoration.

 

 

IV. Restoration is predicted which is to be associated with the formal reunion of Israel and Judah.  Ezekiel 37: 22.  Such restoration never having taken place, it must of necessity be future.

 

 

V.  A restoration is predicted which is to be associated with national conversion.  Ezekiel 36: 24-27.  No such restoration having taken place, it must be future.

 

 

VI.  A distribution of the land and a location of the tribes is predicted which has never been realized in history. It must therefore be future.  Ezekiel 48. (whole chapter).

 

 

VII.  A resettlement upon the land is predicted, after which there is to be no further scattering.  Amos 9: 15.  No such resettlement having taken place in history, it must of necessity be future.

 

 

Together with this most certain and most literal resettlement of the Israel people in the land made over to them by Covenant and occupied up to its furthest limits, there are three promises of soul -  restoration for the Israel race:

 

 

The people will be cleansed and God’s anger turned away from them.  Isaiah 12: 1 and Jeremiah 33: 8, 9.

 

 

They will be brought into new covenant relationship.  Jeremiah 31: 33, 34.

 

 

They will be justified and made righteous.  Isaiah 45: 25; 60: 21.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

173

 

AN EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE

TO THE HEBREWS

 

 

BY ROBERT GOVETT, M.A.

 

 

HEBREWS 10: 25

 

 

“Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together

 

 

 

IT is a matter of notice, even to the worldly, how the assemblies of professed Christians are falling off in numbers.  It denotes internal decay in faith.  And it leads onward to confirmed unbelief.  In those days many, no doubt, were kept away by fear.  The enemy took note of those who met to worship.  And some of the defaulters perhaps said: ‘That they could edify themselves with the Scriptures in private  And others: ‘We know all you can teach  But here is the command of the Lord Jesus.  In our day, the danger is of lukewarmness, preferring worldly pleasure to this duty.  Finding, indeed, small pleasure in the united worship of the saints, they seek it elsewhere.  The assembly of the saints here below is a preparation for the assembling on high (2 Thess. 2: 1).

 

 

The present is the time of the consecration of the better priests.  Aaron’s sons were not to leave the court of the tabernacle nor their fellows, till the seven days of consecration were completed (Lev. 8: 35).  After that, the glory of the Lord would appear (Lev. 9: 4).

 

 

We are to “exhort” one another to look for this return of Christ, and the recompence He will give to the faithful; and, generally, to be ready to meet Him at His appearing; and this more, the more we perceive the close advent of “the day

 

 

What is “the day” here spoken of?  It is “the great and terrible day of the Lord of which prophecy is full.  The Saviour, at Nazareth, declared that the day of mercy was then begun, and the Spirit’s anointing was upon Him to proclaim it.  But just where He left off in Isaiah comes the testimony to “the day of vengeance of our God” (Isa. 61: 1-3).  That season has been noticed before, as that which God has reserved (chap. 9: 27).  It is the time of decision and award, both for foes and friends: for the wheat and the tares, for the harvest and the vintage.

 

 

‘But if we can see the approaching day of wrath, can we not foretell also the day of the Lord’s coming for the rapture of His people

 

 

No!  The two stand quite distinct.  The coming of the Lord is the hope of His people.  ‘The day’ is the warning of woes to the world.  Paul beseeches the saints by the presence of the Lord and our gathering to Him, not to be troubled by tidings of the day, as though judgment had already begun, and the hour of mercy was over (2 Thess. 2).  The hope of the Lord’s waiting ones, who credit prophecy, is, that they shall be caught away to Him out of earth, before the artillery of God’s indignation opens upon an evil world.

 

 

Judgment and its day cannot come till the obedient and watchful ones of the Church have been caught away.  The day of woe cannot descend on the earth, till national rejections of Christ’s faith and name have come.

 

 

But we may see the continual advances of the world towards its, final iniquity.  And with every such advance draws nearer the vengeance of God.  Jesus makes the setting up of the idol of Anti-christ the proof of judgment fully come (Matt. 24: 15-22).  The more Christ’s foes band together and resist the truth, the nearer they are to be put under the feet of the Lord Jesus.

 

 

26. “For if we sin wilfully after receiving the full knowledge of the truth, there remains no further sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that is about to devour the adversaries

 

 

This warning is addressed to “brethren”; to those whose welcome entry to the Holiest has been discovered to us.  They are in danger of letting go the faith and hope, on which present acceptance and future glory depend.

 

 

How dark are the shades in this Epistle, following hard upon its brightest lights!  It is only six verses since the writer spoke of our welcome entry into the Holiest above, through the Son’s High-priesthood.  How awful the warning here!  Yet, to listen to some commentators, one would suppose that this Epistle was the most comforting of all.  Such labour with all their might to deaden and divert the solemnity and directness of the Holy Spirit’s warning.  ‘It is addressed to ‘Professors’ only.  Hence, if you know yourself sincere, it is not meant for you.  Pass on!’

 

 

Was it for “professors”?  Methinks, had there been originally any such Churches of Jerusalem or Judaea, they had taken their flight long before.  Wild ducks take wing as soon as they hear the fowler’s first shot!

 

 

It is the “brethren” that Paul is addressing, both concerning their privileges and their perils.  Who were meant by “brethren”?  Those who had openly and by public profession passed out of the world into the Church of Christ.  They had believed, and been immersed; and had been anointed with the miraculous gifts.  They had taken their stand and place in the assemblies of believers, both before God and man (Acts 2: 42).

 

 

No!  This addresses itself to [regenerate] believers!  “If we sin  Was not Paul’s a sincere heart?  He himself takes his place under this warning.  Or, if Paul did not write this, then the Christian and inspired author of the Epistle here classes himself with those warned.

 

 

There were indeed special perils then - persecution - pressing believers in Christ to turn back to Moses and Law.  But there is evermore during the evil day, more or less danger of falling away.  Beware of the first step: irregular attendance on the meetings of the saints “if we sin wilfully

 

 

Alike under the Old Testament and the New there are two classes of sin. (1) Occasional, and (2) abiding Sins of (1) error, and sins of (2) deliberation, against light and knowledge.  Law admitted to pardon one guilty of sins of ignorance.  But it had neither priest nor sacrifice for the presumptuous offender.  “If any soul sin through ignorance, then he shall bring a she-goat of the first year for a sin-offering.  And the priest shall make atonement for the soul that sinneth ignorantly and it shall be forgiven him.”  “But the soul that doeth ought presumptuously, whether he be born in the land, or a stranger, the same reproachethprovoketh’ - 70] the Lord and that soul shall be cut off from among his people  “His iniquity shall be upon him” (Num. 15: 27-31).

 

 

The sin here described is ‘wilfulspontaneous, as opposed to compulsory, and that of ignorance.  It is the abiding attitude of the soul, as the present tense denotes.  There is no repentance.  ‘He has drawn the sword, and cast away the scabbard

 

 

What makes it so awful is, its taking place after full knowledge.  It is steady sin after a man’s having taken the place of a Christian; after understanding the doctrines of Christ; after baptism, and reception of the gifts of the Spirit.

 

 

“After the full knowledge of the truth,” is an expression strong enough to imply the faith of the person.  But here it is greatly strengthened by the added word: “after the receiving of the full knowledge of the truth  That implies the truth’s entry into the heart, as well as the understanding.  The Holy Spirit does not reckon the truth received, till it has possession of the whole man, the first knowledge is of the forgiveness of sins (Luke 1: 77).  The after-knowledge is the instruction fitted for those who believe, and are received by God and the Church (Col. 1: 9; Tit. 1: 1; 2 Pet. 1: 2, 3).  It answers to the two ‘teachings’ in Matt. 28: 19, 20.  The first precedes baptism, the second follows it.

 

 

Compare this passage with the similar one of Heb. 6: 1-8, and the view is strongly confirmed.  Of the six articles there named, two, ‘repentance and faith’ - go before the next two, the “baptisms of instruction and of laying on of hands”; and two follow after the baptism, and refer to the future day - ‘the resurrection and eternal judgment  And the description of the apostate is given with respect to these.   He was ‘enlightened’ by ‘repentance and faith  Then he “tasted” of the heavenly gift by the baptism of the Spirit, and was “made partaker of the Holy Ghost” by the Spirit’s indwelling.  With these came the knowledge of the better day to come; the glorious hope set before him.  Of that day, the gifts of miracle were the divine pledge; so was the land that had drunk in the rain of heaven, and had been tilled by the instruction of the saints.  If, after that; he fell away, repentance was impossible.

 

 

If then any should so sin, let the man understand, that his case is desperate.   If one sinned wilfully in Moses’ day, there was a better High Priest and Sacrifice to come.  But to one who rejects the priesthood and, sacrifice of Christ, there is no further offering to take away sin.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

174

 

AN EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE TO

THE HEBREWS

 

 

By ROBERT GOVETT, M.A.

 

 

(Heb. 12: 1)

 

 

SIXTH DIVISION

 

 

SANCTIFICATION, AS PREPARATION FOR SEEING GOD.

 

 

CHAP. XII.

 

 

-------

 

 

1. “Therefore let us also, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, having laid aside every weight, and the sin which easily besets us, run with patience the race set before us, looking away to Jesus the Leader and Finisher of the faith; Who because of the joy set before Him, endured the cross. despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God

 

 

The subject of this division is chiefly the personal holiness of the new calling, in view of the Lord’s coming and judgment.

 

 

The Old Testament saints have finished their race, and are waiting -their reward. Our race is going on, but its end is fixed and near.  The length of the course is settled by God, as the prizes also are from Him.

 

 

The Old Testament saints had their sufferings to bear; but they have conquered.  We, too, are called to suffer. The vast number of preceding sufferers and martyrs should encourage us to run as they did, with like hope of the glory.  The general idea gathered from the opening of this chapter by an English reader would be, that the departed saints are spectators of the course of believers now.  That is not, I think, the truth.  The Greek word here used with reference to them relates, I believe, to them as sufferers for the truth during their past life, and not to their present vision of those militant on earth.

 

 

It is the reward attached to the race that is set before those that are already saved.  After the gift of God, - ‘eternal life - comes the prize of our calling, which is, a calling out of earth and into heaven.

 

 

Now, they who run for a prize are careful not to carry any superfluous weight, and do not wear any long and trailing garment that might embarrass their free course, and even throw them down.  Hence our Lord warns us, in the first of His parables which refer to the kingdom, of “the cares of this age, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of other things entering in which choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful” (Mark 4: 19).  These, then, are the weights which are to be laid aside.  He who is seeking the riches of the present world is not running the race for the kingdom.  The earthly blessings promised by Moses’ Law to the obedient Jew would be hindrances in the way of one running the present race.  And Jesus bids the rich young man to lay them aside, and follow Him, on His way to the millennial kingdom and its glory (Matt. 19).  What will the Lord Jesus say to those believers, who are seeking, with all their might, to gain wealth? when He has told us, that, into the millennial kingdom of glory it is impossible for the rich disciple to enter (Luke 16: 20-26).  No warrior entangles himself with buying or selling, or like pursuits, that he may please his general (2 Tim. 2: 4). “Thou, O man of God, flee these things” (1 Tim. 6: 11).  While Abraham walked with God in freedom in a tent, Lot was hindered and entangled by a house within Sodom.

 

 

Things not positively evil in themselves become so, when regarded as engaging the believer’s heart, money, time, and abilities.  Science, and the study of God’s works in nature, were quite right in Solomon’s day; but to any believers in pursuit of Christ’s cause and the glory to come, they would be great hindrances.  There are also some sins to which, by nature and position, we are prone, against which we must watch, and seek to overcome.

 

 

The easily besetting sin of that day was, unbelief of Christ’s return, and drawing back to Moses.  In this, as in all other points, Jesus is our perfect example.

 

 

Should we read it:- “Author and finisher of (our) faith”?  I think not.  The author of this Epistle is sparing in the use of the article where it would naturally be employed.  And here we have it before ‘faith  He is not then, I think, speaking of faith as it is an internal principle; but of “the faith the Christian religion.  Jesus began it, and His coming will close it.  It is a system of faith, dependent on His absence, to be completed when He returns.  There will then be an end of baptism and the Lord’s Supper: it will be a walking by sight, and not, as now, by faith.

 

 

We are, in our Lord’s case, to behold the perfect example of the life of faith.  Great was His toil, great the opposition and enmity He encountered; but He so perfectly glorified His Father in the arduous course set before Him, that He is seated in the loftiest post in heaven, as having accomplished the race to the full satisfaction of the Most High.  In His journey toward the goal, through reproach and shame, He was cheered by the prize set before Him.  “He shall see of the travail of His soul, and be satisfied (Isa. 53: 11).  If that hope was of service to the Lord Jesus Himself, how unwise and unscriptural are those who would exclude all regard to the coming rewards of millennial glory.  At the end of the Saviour’s course stood the cross and its bitterness.  But He looked beyond it, and its pains and shame, and now the time of His visible exaltation is to come.  The kingdom is His: as the Son of man, all creation shall be at His feet; the angels shall worship.

 

 

Already, before that day, the Father, well pleased, has called Him up on high, and seated the Great Victor, with Himself, on His throne.

 

 

3. “For consider Him Who endured so great contradiction by sinners against Himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds

 

 

We [are] apt to faint at the special difficulties, indignities, and contradictions, which assail us.  We are ready to feel, and to say, that our troubles are sorer and heavier than those of any others.  The remedy for such a feeling, and the true check of such a speech, is here supplied.  Consider the resistance, the gainsaying, by malice and falsehood, which He, Who was the Wisdom of God, and the Power of God, was called to undergo.  The Sinless One was contradicted by the sinful sons of men; the Son of God by His creatures and subjects.  He could, by a word, have cut off the liars and rebels; but He was patient throughout.  If, then, He suffered so much, marvel not that you, Christian, are called also to endure hindrance and contradiction in the way of duty, and when you are sure you are testifying to God’s truth.  A view of what the Divine Saviour suffered must check complaint in the saved.  Indeed, every affliction that we have met for Christ’s sake, will be to our glory.

 

 

4-6. “Not yet have ye resisted unto blood, wrestling against sin.  And ye have forgotten the exhortation which talketh with you as with sons: ‘My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked by him for whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, but scourgeth every son whom He receiveth’.”

 

 

Life itself is, at God’s demand to be given up, as the Saviour taught us, both by precept and example.  As yet that had not been called for from the Hebrew Christians generally.  They must see mercy, then, in the limits set on the power of their persecutors.

 

 

But now the Apostle proceeds to open a new view of the sufferings which, in various forms, the Hebrew Christians were bearing from their neighbours and fellow-countrymen.  They must regard the afflictions of their journey through the wilderness as the mode of education, by which their Heavenly Father was preparing them for an eternal [and millennial] abode with Himself.  Under the Law, the men of obedience were to experience all the sunshine and the blessings of earth.  But the dispensation has changed with the coming of the Son of God; and now, rejection by earth is the way to the [promised messianic] glory …

 

 

-------

 

 

Psalm 47

 

By Norman R Perry

 

 

O clap your hands all people, shout your triumphant songs;

Praise ye the Lord Almighty to whom all power belongs.

He shall subdue the nations, He shall control their rage;

And He, the great disposer, will choose our heritage.

 

 

God on high ascended, with triumphant blast and shout,

While never-ending praises circle His throne about,

O’er all the earth He ruleth, for He alone is King;

To Him we bring all praises, to Him with gladness sing.

 

 

God ruleth o’er the heathen, and holy is His throne;

Earth’s princes [will] meet together and own Him God alone.

His people round Him gather, His foes before Him fall;

All power to Him belongeth, He ruleth over all.

 

 

 

This Psalm, like many others, is so obviously millennial that it amazes us that there are people who profess to believe the Word of God yet they say that they do not see it.  There is a repetition of the fact that Jehovah is King of all the earth, and that He will subdue and reign over nations.  It is true that God controls the wickedness of this present evil age and that nothing that comes to pass, is outside His Sovereign decree but the Scriptures says more than this.  With the world in its present state, how can Christians believe that these words are completely fulfilled now and that we are at this moment living in the millennium?  Praise God that in spite of many unbelieving believers, and / or professing believers, this Psalm will be fulfilled literally.”)

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

175

 

The Septenary Arrangement of Scripture

 

 

BY ARLEN L CHITWOOD

 

 

There remaineth therefore a restSabbath rest’] to the people of God: (Heb. 4: 9).

 

 

-------

 

 

 

Hebrews 4: 1-11 deals with a rest which will be realized by “the people of God” during the seventh millennium dating from the restoration of the earth and the creation of man in the first chapter of Genesis.  Teachings surrounding this rest, textually and contextually, are based on three portions of Old Testament Scripture: (1) The experiences of the Israelites under Moses, and later Joshua (Heb. 3: 2-19), (2) God’s work and subsequent rest during the seven days of Gen. 1: 2 (Heb. 4: 4), and 3) the Sabbath given to Israel which the nation was to keep week after week following six days of work (Heb. 4: 9).

 

 

The experiences of the Israelites under Moses, and later Joshua, during a past dispensation form the type; and the experiences of Christians under Christ during the present dispensation form the antitype.  Then teachings surrounding a rest lying before both the Israelites in the type and Christians in the antitype are drawn from the rest which God entered into following six days of work in Gen. 1: 2.  And the Sabbath was given to Israel to keep the whole overall thought of that which occurred in the opening two chapters of Genesis ever before them (cf. Ex. 20: 8-11; 31: 13-17).

 

 

Teachings drawn from the opening two chapters of Genesis form the key to the entire matter, and a correct understanding and interpretation of these opening chapters is not something which should be taken lightly. Scripture is actually built upon a structure which is laid down in these two chapters, and an individual’s understanding and interpretation of numerous things throughout the remainder of Scripture will be governed by his understanding and interpretation of this opening section of Scripture.

 

 

If one understands these opening verses correctly, he will understand how God has structured His revelation to man, allowing him to grasp numerous things which he could not otherwise understand.  However, if one fails to understand these opening verses correctly, the opposite will be true.  He will have gone wrong at the beginning, and he will remain wrong the remainder of the way.

 

 

The preceding, for example, is the reason many individuals fail to see the proper relationship of the Sabbath rest in Heb. 4: 9 to God’s rest following six days of work in Gen. 12: 3.  They attempt to relate this rest to something which Christians enter into during the present day and time, which is a time prior to the seven day, a time not even in view (except possibly by way of a secondary application).  Or this is the reason many individuals attempt to understand 2 Peter 3: 8 in the light of Psa. 90: 4, when, contextually, 2 Peter 3: 8 must be understood in the light of the opening two chapters of Genesis (cf. 2 Peter 1: 16-18; 3: 5-7).

 

 

With these things in mind, the remainder of the material in this chapter will deal with the structure of the Hebrew text in parts of especially the first chapter of Genesis - particularly verse two - and the testimony of the remainder of Scripture insofar as the opening two chapters of Genesis are concerned.

 

 

One MUST understand what is revealed at the beginning first.  This is the key.  Only then can an individual be in a position to move forward and properly understand the remainder.

 

 

“WAS” OR “BECAME”

 

 

It would go without saying that there has been a great deal of controversy over the years among theologians and Christians in general concerning exactly how two chapters of Genesis should be understood.  And it would also go without saying that, resultingly, confusion has reigned supreme in Christian circles concerning not only these chapters but the general tenor of the remainder of Scripture as well.

 

 

There are actually two major schools of thought surrounding these two opening chapters, though there are a number of variations within that held by those in each school.  Those in one school (probably the position held by the majority today) view the six days in the first chapter as time revealing God’s creative activity from verse one, and those in the other school view these six days as time revealing God’s restoration of a ruined creation seen in verse two.

 

 

Then there is a somewhat popular third school of thought which views Gen. 1: 1 as other than an absolute beginning.  Most of those holding this view see verse one as an opening statement dealing with restoration, not creation.  That is, they see the verse dealing, not with God’s creation of the heavens and the earth in an absolute sense (as most view the verse), but with the beginning of God’s restoration (reforming, re-moulding, refashioning) of a previously perfect creation which had fallen into a state of ruin.

 

 

Much of the controversy surrounding these different views is centred in the linguistics of verse two. Grammarians go back to the Hebrew text and deal with two areas: (1) the relationship to verse one of the three circumstantial clauses making up this verse, and (2) the meaning of the Hebrew word hayah (translated “was”). And good Hebrew grammarians reach different conclusions in both realms.

 

 

1. THE THREE CIRCUMSTANTIAL CLAUSES

 

 

The three circumstantial clauses in Gen. 1: 2 are simply the clauses which form the verse: (a) “And the earth was without form, and void (b) “and darkness was upon the face of the deep,” (c) “And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters

 

 

In the Hebrew text there is what is called a “waw” beginning verse two (a conjunctive or disjunctive particle, translated “And” in most English texts).  Some grammarians view this particle in a conjunctive sense (showing a connection between verse 1 and verse 2), and others view it in a disjunctive sense (showing a separation between verse 1 and verse 2).  Normally the context determines how the particle is to be understood.

 

 

(The Hebrew text of the Old Testament uses the “waw” more frequently in a conjunctive [and] rather than a disjunctive [but] sense.  Of the approximately 28,000 usages of this particle, some 25,000 appear to be conjunctive and some 3,000 disjunctive.)

 

 

Those viewing the “waw” beginning Gen. 1: 2 in a conjunctive sense would see the three circumstantial clauses as inseparably connected with verse one, and those viewing the “waw” in a disjunctive sense would, instead, see a separation between these two verses.

 

 

If there is an inseparable connection of the clauses in verse two with verse one, and verse one describes an absolute beginning in relation to the heavens and the earth (God’s actual creation of the heavens and the earth in the beginning), then verse two would have to describe how God created the earth in the beginning (i.e., “without form, and void”).  Understanding the structure of the Hebrew text after this fashion would necessitate viewing that which is described at the beginning of verse two as the condition of the earth at the time of the action described in verse one.  Then the six subsequent days would have to be looked upon as time in which God, step by step, performed and completed his work of creation introduced in verse one.

 

 

The preceding view of the structure of the Hebrew text is the reason for the position held by some that Gen. 1: 1 describes the beginning of God’s restorative work rather than an absolute beginning.  Those holding this view see the three circumstantial clauses in verse two as inseparably connected with verse one, but they also see that Scripture teaches a subsequent ruin of the creation following God’s creation of the heavens and the earth in the beginning (e.g., cf. Gen. 1: 2 and Isa. 45: 18 [the Heb. word tohu, translated “without form” in Gen. 1: 2 is translated “in vain” in Isa. 45: 18; and this verse in Isaiah specifically states that God did not create the earth tohu, i.e., after the fashion in which it is seen in Gen. 1: 2]).

 

 

Thus, those who see God’s perfect creation undergoing a subsequent ruin but also view the three circumstantial clauses in verse two as inseparably connected with verse one are forced into a particular position concerning the interpretation of the opening verses of Genesis.  They are forced into the position of seeing the actual creation of the heavens and the earth, and also the ruin of the heavens and the earth, as occurring at a time prior to Gen. 1: 1, events which they would see as not being dealt with per se in the opening verses of Scripture at all.

 

 

Then there are those grammarians who see the “waw” beginning verse two as disjunctive (similar to the Greek “de which is used both ways in the New Testament [cf. Matt. 1: 2-16; 25: 31, ASV]; also the Septuagint [Gk. translation of the O.T.] uses “de” in a disjunctive sense beginning Gen. 1: 2).  And, viewing the matter after this fashion, there would be no connection between the first two verse of Genesis.  Rather, a separation would exist instead.  Within this view, one would normally see verse one revealing an absolute beginning, with verse two (along with the verses following) revealing events occurring at later points in time.

 

 

(Most holding this linguistic view see verse two as a description of God’s perfect creation [from verse one] being brought into a ruined state, separated from verse one by an unrevealed period of time; and they would, accordingly, see God’s activity during the six days as activity surrounding the restoration of this ruined creation.  Some holding this linguistic view though still see the six days as time revealing God’s creative activity.  They view verse one as describing a “grand summary declaration that God created the universe in the beginning.” Then they view God’s activity during the six days as a revelation concerning how God accomplished that which He had previously stated in verse one.)

 

 

2. THE HEBREW WORD “HAYAH”

 

 

Hayah is the Hebrew word translated “was” in most English versions of Gen. 1: 2And the earth was…”) The word is found numerous times throughout chapter one and about 3,570 times in the entire Old Testament.

 

 

The etymology of the word is somewhat questionable (most look at the probable primary meaning of hayah as “falling” or “to fall”).  Hebrew scholars though see the word used over and over in the Old Testament in the sense of “to be,” “to become,” or “to come to pass  And through attempts to trace the etymology of the word, comparing the Hebrew with the Arabic (a related Semitic language), and seeing how the word is used in the Old Testament, many scholars have come to look upon the word in the sense of a verb of being to be”).  But scholars also recognize that it is not completely valid to equate the word with the English verb of being after this fashion.

 

 

The word is translated different ways in English versions - e.g., “was” or “were” (Gen. 1: 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, etc.), “be” (Gen. 1: 3, 6, 14, 29, etc.), “became [or, ‘to become’]” (Gen. 2: 7, 10; 3: 22, etc.).  But that’s in English versions.  In the Latin Vulgate there are thirteen instances where hayah has been translated in the sense of “became” in Genesis, chapter one alone (the word appears twenty-seven times in this chapter); and in the Septuagint there are twenty-two such instances in this one chapter.

 

 

The first use of hayah in Scripture is in Gen. 1: 2 - the verse under consideration in this study.  But going beyond this verse for a moment, note how the word is used elsewhere in chapter one.

 

 

Hayah appears twice in verse three, translated “be” and “was  And translating, “Let light be [or ‘become’]: and light became would actually best convey the thought of that which occurred.

 

 

Then note verses 5, 8, 13, 19, 23, 31.  The word hayah appears two times in the latter part of each verse (both translated in the English text by the one word, “were”).  Translating literally from the Hebrew, using “was” in the translation, the text would read, “... And there was evening and there was morning, [comprising] the first day ... the second day ... the third day,” etc.

 

 

Actually though, “became” would really better convey the thought surrounding that which occurred, for evening and morning came to pass, “became,” comprising each of the six different days.  Leupold appears to capture the overall thought quite well in his commentary by translating, “...Then came evening, then came morning - the first day ... the second day ... the third day,” etc.

 

 

Then note the words, “...and it was so at the end of verses 7, 9, 11, 15, 24, 30.  “Was” in each reference is a translation of the word hayah, and it is easy to see that “became” rather than “was” would really provide a better description of that which occurred in each instance, translating, “...and it became so” (cf. “Let there be [a translation of hayah]...” [vv. 3, 6, 14]).

 

 

Though hayah has been translated “was,” “were,” or “be” throughout the first chapter of Genesis, the word is actually used mainly throughout this chapter in the sense of “be,” “became,” or “had become  Attention is called to this fact because numerous individuals look at the translation “became [or ‘had become’]” as so rare in the Old Testament that serious consideration should not be given to the thought of translating Gen. 1: 2, “And [or ‘But’] the earth became [or ‘had become’]...”  But the rarity is in the English translations, not in a literal Hebrew rendering or in certain other translations (e.g., in the KJV there are only 17 instances in all of Genesis where hayah has been translated “became [or, ‘...become’]” [2: 7, 10; 3: 22; 9: 15; 18: 18; 19: 26; 20: 12; 21: 20; 24: 67; 32: 10; 34: 16; 37: 20; 47: 20, 26; 48: 19]; but in the Septuagint there are at least 146 instances [and some 1,500 in the entire O.T.]).

 

 

3. THE HEBREW TEXT ALONE

 

 

Can linguistic questions surrounding the first two verses of Genesis be resolved from the Hebrew text alone? Can one determine from the Hebrew text alone whether the “waw” beginning verse two is conjunctive or disjunctive?  Or can one determine from the Hebrew text alone how the word hayah should be translated in verse two?  Or can one determine from the Hebrew structure of verse two alone how the remainder of the first chapter should be understood in an overall sense?

 

 

Some Hebrew scholars would answer in the affirmative, but because of the different ways a number of Hebrew scholars view the matter at hand, the issue could only be resolved within their minds and possibly within the minds of others who follow their same line of reasoning.  And note that the issue would be resolved by different scholars after entirely different fashions, all based on their understanding of the grammatical structure of the Hebrew text.

 

 

However, there is another way to approach the matter; and that other way is to see how the whole of Scripture deals with the issue at hand.  If the whole of Scripture can be shown to support one view alone - which it can - then the correct linguistic understanding of Gen. 1: 2 and the corresponding correct interpretation of chapter one can easily and unquestionably be demonstrated.

 

 

This is not to say that Gen. 1: 2 or the first chapter of Genesis as a whole cannot be understood correctly apart from first going to the remainder of Scripture, for that cannot be the case.  God would not have begun His revelation to man after a fashion which man could not have understood a part from subsequent revelation (requiring approx. 1,500 years to complete).  But this is to say that the correct linguistic position for Gen. 1: 2 and the correct corresponding interpretation of the entire chapter - which can be shown by going to the remainder of Scripture - is a position which God would have expected man to see as evident when he began reading at this point in Genesis, though man many times does not do so.

 

 

Thus, in this respect, a knowledge of the way in which the Hebrew text is structured is really not going to resolve the issue at hand.  And time has been spent in the Hebrew construction of Gen. 1: 2 and other related passages, not in an attempt to resolve the issue, but to demonstrate two basic things: (a) There are good, reputable Hebrew scholars who hold varying views on the opening verses of Genesis, which are many times based strictly on their understanding of the structure of the Hebrew text, apart from contextual considerations; and (b) though the linguistics of the Hebrew text (within the different ways scholars understand the text) will support any one of these views, all but one are out of line with the remainder of Scripture and are, consequently, wrong.

 

 

That is to say, though different views can be supported from the structure of the Hebrew text alone, different views cannot be supported when the remainder of Scripture is taken into consideration -  with or without the Hebrew text.  Scripture will support only one view. …

 

 

Scripture will support “Creation” (an absolute creation [v. 1]), a “Ruin” of the creation (which means that the “waw” beginning v. 2 must be understood in a disjunctive sense [‘But’], and the Hebrew word hayah must be understood in the sense of “became [or ‘had become’]” [v. 2a]), a “Restoration” of the ruined creation (performed entirely through Divine intervention [vv. 2b-25]), and “Time” (six days of restorative work, followed by one day of rest [1: 2b-2: 3]).

 

 

And to illustrate this is not difficult at all.  In fact, the opposite is true.  It is a very simple matter to illustrate, from other Scripture, exactly how the opening verses of Genesis must be understood.

 

 

DAYS IN SCRIPTURE

 

 

The structure of God’s revelation to man will be set forth briefly under three headings, and material discussed under these three headings will relate specifically to how particular sections of Scripture handle the matter at hand.  Then attention will be called to other related Scriptures outside these sections to better present the overall picture from the whole of Scripture.

 

 

1. THE SIGN OF THE SABBATH

 

 

The Sabbath was a sign of “a perpetual covenant  God stated concerning the Sabbath, “It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever [Heb. ‘olam’ i.e. for the ‘age to come’ (Heb. 6: 5, R.V.)]*: for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed” (Ex. 31: 16, 17).  When giving the Sabbath to Israel (cf. Ex. 20: 11) or referring to the Sabbath rest awaiting the people of God in Hebrews, in each instance, for a very good reason, God called attention to that which occurred in Gen. 1, 2.  There is a latter work of restoration, followed by rest, which is based on the former; and the Sabbath was given to Israel to keep this thought ever before the nation.

 

[* See “The Dualism of Eternal Life” by S. S. Craig.]

 

 

That is, though the sign of the Sabbath concerned a present work and future [millennial] rest, it was based on a past work and rest.  God worked six days to restore a ruined creation in the opening chapter of Genesis; and on the sixth day, along with the completion of His work of restoration, He brought man into existence to rule over the restored material creation. Then God rested on the seventh day.  But a ruin ensued once again.  Man, an entirely new creation in the universe, fell; and, as a result, the restored material creation was brought under a curse, leaving God with two ruined creations: man, and the material creation.

 

 

With that in mind, how did God, in the Genesis account, set about to restore these two ruined creations?  The answer is not only clearly revealed but it is also very simple.  According to Scripture, God set about to restore the subsequent ruined creations in exactly the same manner as He had restored the former ruined creation in the opening chapter of Genesis.  He set about to restore the ruined creations over six days of time, and He, in accord with Gen. 2: 2, 3, would then rest on the seventh [i.e., Millennial and Messianic (2 Pet. 3: 8,. Cf. Ps. 2: 8; 110: 1-3; Lk. 1: 32, R.V.] ‘day’.

 

 

The latter restoration must occur in complete keeping with the former restoration.  A pattern has been set in the opening verses of Genesis which cannot change.  The latter restoration must occur over a six-day period.  And also in accord with this pattern there must be a day of rest following the six days of work.

 

 

The Sabbath was given to Israel to keep the thought ever before the nation that God, in accord with the opening verses of Genesis, was going to once again rest for one day following six days of work to effect the restoration of that which is presently in a ruined state (both man and the material creation).  The Sabbath was a “sign and a sign in Scripture points to something beyond itself.  The Sabbath points to a seventh-day rest which God will enter into with His people (“the people of God” in Heb. 4: 9) following six previous days of restorative work.

 

 

Each day in the former restoration and rest was twenty-four hours in length, but each day in the latter restoration and rest is revealed to be one thousand years in length (2 Peter 1: 16-18; 3: 3-8; cf. Matt. 16: 28-17: 5).  Based on the pattern set forth in Gen. 1, 2, God is going to work for six thousand years during the present restoration and then rest the seventh one-thousand-year period.

 

 

Scripture begins by laying the basis for this septenary arrangement of time in the opening verses (Gen. 1, 2), this is something seen throughout Scripture (Ex. 31: 13-17; Num. 19: 12; Hosea 5: 15- 6: 2; Jonah 1: 17; Matt. 17: 1; Luke 24: 21; John 1: 29, 35, 43; 2: 1; 5: 9; 9: 14; 11: 6, 7; Heb. 4: 1, 4, 9), and this is the way God concludes His revelation surrounding time immediately prior to the eternal ages (Rev. 20: 4-6).

 

 

Scripture deals with 7,000 years of time - time extending from the restoration of the earth and the creation of man to the end of the Messianic Kingdom.  Scripture has very little to say about what occurred prior to these 7,000 years, and it also has very little to say about what will occur following these 7,000 years.  Scripture is built on this septenary arrangement of time, which is based on the opening two chapters of Genesis; and this is an evident fact which must be recognized if one would correctly understand God’s redemptive plans and purposes which He has revealed in His Word.

 

 

2. THE SIGNS IN JOHN’S GOSPEL

 

 

The Gospel of John is built around seven signs; and, as in the sign of the Sabbath, the signs in this gospel point to things beyond the signs themselves.

 

 

It is the Jews who require a sign (1 Cor. 1: 22); and these signs, taken from numerous signs which Jesus performed during His earthly ministry, are directed (as was His ministry in that day) to the Jewish people. Jesus performed such signs for one central purpose: “...that ye [the Jews] might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name” (John 20: 30, 31; cf. John 2: 11; 5: 46, 47; 6: 14, 21; 11: 45).

 

 

Six of the seven signs in John’s gospel were performed in connection with particular days, all in perfect keeping with one another, all in perfect keeping with the sign of the Sabbath, and all in perfect keeping with the septenary arrangement of Scripture.  And all of the signs refer, after different fashions, to the same thing. They all refer to Israel’s coming salvation and restoration.

 

 

The first sign, in 2: 1-11, has to do with Jesus turning the water in six waterpots to wine (“six,” man’s number; the waterpots made from the earth, as man; filled with water [the Word]; and through Divine intervention a change ensues).  This sign, pointing to the future salvation of Israel, occurred on the seventh day (1: 29, 35, 43; 11), which is when [the people of] Israel will be saved yet future.

 

 

The second sign, in 4: 40-54, has to do with the healing of a nobleman’s son.  This sign occurred after Jesus had spent two days with the Samaritans, on the third day (vv. 40, 43).  It will be after two days visiting “the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his nameon the third day, that Jesus will return to the Jewish people and the nation will be healed (cf. Hosea 5: 15 - 6: 2; Acts 15: 14-8).

 

 

The third sign, in 5: 1-9, has to do with a man being healed. This occurred after thirty-eight years, on the Sabbath (vv. 5, 9). The reference (in the type) would be to the healing of the nation through the second generation of Israelites being allowed to enter the land under Joshua after thirty-eight years (dating from [their apostasy and] the overthrow at Kadesh-Barnea), referring to that time (in the antitype) when the nation will be healed and be allowed to enter the land under Christ, an event which will occur on the seventh day, the Sabbath.

 

 

The fourth sign, in 6: 1-14, has to do with bread being provided for the multitudes; and the sign occurred in connection with the Passover (v. 4).  Jesus is that “bread of life” which will be provided for the nation yet future (v. 35), and the Passover is the festival in Lev. 23 which has to do with the future salvation of Israel, when the nation will receive the true “bread of life  Israel has slain the Lamb (cf. Ex. 12: 6; Acts 2: 36; 3: 14, 15), but the nation has vet to appropriate the blood (cf. Ex. 12: 7, 13; Zech. 12: 10; Rom. 11: 26).

 

 

The fifth sign, in 6: 15-21, has to do with Christ’s departure, a storm, His return, the disciples’ attitude toward Him at this time, and the geographical location in which they subsequently found themselves.  It points to Christ’s departure from Israel two thousand years ago (v. 15), the coming Tribulation (vv. 16-18), Christ’s return (vv. 19, 20), the nation receiving Him (v. 21a), and the nation’s restoration to the land (v. 21b).  This is the only sign giving no specific reference to particular days, but the chronology must be understood in the light of the other six signs.

 

 

The sixth sign, in 9: 1-41, has to do with the healing of a blind man, on the Seventh day (v. 14).  This points to Israel’s future deliverance from her blindness (Rom. 11: 25), which will occur on the seventh day, the Sabbath.  Or, as in Luke 24:13-31, it will occur after two days (dating from the crucifixion), on the third day (v. 21).

 

 

The seventh sign, in 11: 1-44, has to do with the resurrection of Lazarus.  This [select]* resurrection occurred after Jesus had been out of the land of Judea two days, on the third day (vv. 6, 7), after Lazarus had lain in the grave four days (v. 17).  This points to Israel’s future resurrection (Ezek. 37:12-14; Dan. 12: 2) after two days, on the third day; and at this time Israel will have been in the place of death [i.e., in the underworld of ‘Sheol’ / ‘Hades.’ (Lk. 16: 23; Acts 2: 27, 34; 7: 4, 5. cf. 2 Tim. 2: 18; Rev. 6: 9-11, R.V.] four days, dating four millenniums back to Abraham.

 

[* See Phil. 3: 11. cf. Rev. 20: 4-6 with Acts 7: 4, 5; Heb. 10: 40; 11: 35b, R.V. etc.]

 

 

3. THE STRUCTURE OF 2 PETER

 

 

2 Peter parallels Jude in the sense that both deal with the Word of the Kingdom and apostasy after a similar fashion.

 

 

Both epistles begin the same way.  The first chapter of 2 Peter is taken up with that which is stated in one verse in Jude (v. 3).  Then the matter of apostasy is dealt with throughout most of the remainder of both epistles. However, there are things dealt with in the first and third chapters of 2 Peter, showing the septenary structure of the epistle, which are not dealt with at all in Jude.

 

 

Peter exhorts his readers to make their “calling [pertaining to the kingdom] and electionselection’ for a position of power and authority in the kingdom] sure” (1: 1-15); and Jude states the same thing in Jude 3 when he exhorts his readers to “earnestly contend forstrive with respect to’] the faith” (cf. 1 Tim. 6: 12; 2 Tim. 4: 7, 8).  Then the thought of apostasy relative to “the faith” comes into view in both epistles.

 

 

However, Peter does something which Jude does not do.  Before beginning his dissertation on apostasy he calls attention to that which occurred on the Mount in Matt. 17: 1-8 (2 Peter 1: 16-18), which has to do with the Son of Man coming in His kingdom, after six days, on the seventh day (cf. Matt. 16: 28 - 17: 1).

 

 

Then toward the end of his epistle, Peter, unlike Jude, moves from thoughts surrounding apostasy to thoughts surrounding the existence and subsequent destruction of the heavens and the earth at two different times - (a) at a time following the creation of the heavens and the earth “the heavens ... of old” and “the world that then was [the world existing at the time of ‘the heavens ... of old’]” [vv. 5, 6]), and (b) at a time following the restoration of the heavens and the earth the heavens and the earth which are now” [v. 7]).

 

 

The destruction of the former is seen in Gen. 1: 2aBut the earth had become without form, and void; and darkness [the sun had ceased to give its light] was upon the face of the deepthe raging waters’]” and the destruction of the latter - a destruction by fire - is seen in succeeding verses in 2 Peter 3: 10ff).

 

 

Peter then draws the entire matter to a climax by stating that “one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (3: 8).  Understood contextually, the verse is self-explanatory.  “The heavens and the earth, which are now” (v. 7) must cover the entire septenary period from chapter one (vv. 16-18), else 2 Peter 3: 8 would be meaningless.  And each day in this period is revealed to be one thousand years in length - six millenniums of work, followed by one millennium of rest, based on the opening verses of Genesis.

 

 

CONCLUDING REMARKS:

 

 

Viewing the whole of Scripture, the correct interpretation of the opening verses of Genesis can be clearly and unquestionably presented through the typical nature of Old Testament history (1 Cor. 10: 6, 11), as it is set forth in the very evident Divinely established septenary arrangement of Scripture.  And these opening verses, providing the Divinely established basis for that which follows, must be understood accordingly.

 

 

The Bible is a book of redemption; and only a correct view of the opening verses of Genesis can reflect positively, at the very outset, on God’s redemptive message as a whole (the restoration of a ruined creation, performed in its entirety through Divine intervention, for a revealed purpose).

 

 

An incorrect view can, on the other hand, only have negative ramifications.  Creation alone, apart from a ruin and restoration of the creation, fails to convey the complete message; and Restoration alome (viewing the opening verse as other than an absolute beginning), apart from a record of the preceding creation and ruin, likewise fails to convey the complete message.

 

 

It is as F. W. Grant stated years ago: “The thought of a ruined condition of the earth succeeding its original creation ... is ... required by the typical view [man’s creation, ruin, and subsequent restoration paralleling the earth’s creation, ruin, and subsequent restoration].”

 

 

Accordingly, the opening verses of Genesis cannot deal strictly with Creation; nor can these verses deal strictly with Restoration.  Either view would be out of line with the whole of Scripture, beginning with the central theme of Scripture, the message of redemption.

 

 

The only interpretative view which will fit - at all points - within the Divinely established septenary arrangement of Scripture (which has it basis in these opening verses) is...

 

 

Creation (an absolute creation [v. 1])

 

 

A Ruin of the Greation (v. 2a).

 

 

A Restoration of the Ruined Creation (vv. 2b-25).

 

 

Time (in the type - six days of restorative work, followed by a day of rest; in the antitype - six thousand years of restorative work, followed by one thousand years of rest [1: 2b - 2: 3]).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

176

 

The Septenary Arrangement of Scripture

 

 

BY ARLEN L CHITWOOD

 

 

There remaineth therefore a restSabbath rest’] to the people of God: (Heb. 4: 9).

 

 

-------

 

 

 

Hebrews 4: 1-11 deals with a rest which will be realized by “the people of God” during the seventh millennium dating from the restoration of the earth and the creation of man in the first chapter of Genesis.  Teachings surrounding this rest, textually and contextually, are based on three portions of Old Testament Scripture: (1) The experiences of the Israelites under Moses, and later Joshua (Heb. 3: 2-19), (2) God’s work and subsequent rest during the seven days of Gen. 1: 2 (Heb. 4: 4), and 3) the Sabbath given to Israel which the nation was to keep week after week following six days of work (Heb. 4: 9).

 

 

The experiences of the Israelites under Moses, and later Joshua, during a past dispensation form the type; and the experiences of Christians under Christ during the present dispensation form the antitype.  Then teachings surrounding a rest lying before both the Israelites in the type and Christians in the antitype are drawn from the rest which God entered into following six days of work in Gen. 1: 2.  And the Sabbath was given to Israel to keep the whole overall thought of that which occurred in the opening two chapters of Genesis ever before thern (cf. Ex. 20: 8-11; 31: 13-17).

 

 

Teachings drawn from the opening two chapters of Genesis form the key to the entire matter, and a correct understanding and interpretation of these opening chapters is not something which should be taken lightly. Scripture is actually built upon a structure which is laid down in these two chapters, and an individual’s understanding and interpretation of numerous things throughout the remainder of Scripture will be governed by his understanding and interpretation of this opening section of Scripture.

 

 

If one understands these opening verses correctly, he will understand how God has structured His revelation to man, allowing him to grasp numerous things which he could not otherwise understand.  However, if one fails to understand these opening verses correctly, the opposite will be true.  He will have gone wrong at the beginning, and he will remain wrong the remainder of the way.

 

 

The preceding, for example, is the reason many individuals fail to see the proper relationship of the Sabbath rest in Heb. 4: 9 to God’s rest following six days of work in Gen. 12: 3.  They attempt to relate this rest to something which Christians enter into during the present day and time, which is a time prior to the seven day, a time not even in view (except possibly by way of a secondary application).  Or this is the reason many individuals attempt to understand 2 Peter 3: 8 in the light of Psa. 90: 4, when, contextually, 2 Peter 3: 8 must be understood in the light of the opening two chapters of Genesis (cf. 2 Peter 1: 16-18; 3: 5-7).

 

 

With these things in mind, the remainder of the material in this chapter will deal with the structure of the Hebrew text in parts of especially the first chapter of Genesis - particularly verse two - and the testimony of the remainder of Scripture insofar as the opening two chapters of Genesis are concerned.

 

 

One MUST understand what is revealed at the beginning first.  This is the key.  Only then can an individual be in a position to move forward and properly understand the remainder.

 

 

“WAS” OR “BECAME”

 

 

It would go without saying that there has been a great deal of controversy over the years among theologians and Christians in general concerning exactly how two chapters of Genesis should be understood.  And it would also go without saying that, resultingly, confusion has reigned supreme in Christian circles concerning not only these chapters but the general tenor of the remainder of Scripture as well.

 

 

There are actually two major schools of thought surrounding these two opening chapters, though there are a number of variations within that held by those in each school.  Those in one school (probably the position held by the majority today) view the six days in the first chapter as time revealing God’s creative activity from verse one, and those in the other school view these six days as time revealing God’s restoration of a ruined creation seen in verse two.

 

 

Then there is a somewhat popular third school of thought which views Gen. 1: 1 as other than an absolute beginning.  Most of those holding this view see verse one as an opening statement dealing with restoration, not creation.  That is, they see the verse dealing, not with God’s creation of the heavens and the earth in an absolute sense (as most view the verse), but with the beginning of God’s restoration (reforming, re-moulding, refashioning) of a previously perfect creation which had fallen into a state of ruin.

 

 

Much of the controversy surrounding these different views is centred in the linguistics of verse two. Grammarians go back to the Hebrew text and deal with two areas: (1) the relationship to verse one of the three circumstantial clauses making up this verse, and (2) the meaning of the Hebrew word hayah (translated “was”). And good Hebrew grammarians reach different conclusions in both realms.

 

 

1. THE THREE CIRCUMSTANTIAL CLAUSES

 

 

The three circumstantial clauses in Gen. 1: 2 are simply the clauses which form the verse: (a) “And the earth was without form, and void (b) “and darkness was upon the face of the deep,” (c) “And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters

 

 

In the Hebrew text there is what is called a “waw” beginning verse two (a conjunctive or disjunctive particle, translated “And” in most English texts).  Some grammarians view this particle in a conjunctive sense (showing a connection between verse 1 and verse 2), and others view it in a disjunctive sense (showing a separation between verse 1 and verse 2).  Normally the context determines how the particle is to be understood.

 

 

(The Hebrew text of the Old Testament uses the “waw” more frequently in a conjunctive [and] rather than a disjunctive [but] sense.  Of the approximately 28,000 usages of this particle, some 25,000 appear to be conjunctive and some 3,000 disjunctive.)

 

 

Those viewing the “waw” beginning Gen. 1: 2 in a conjunctive sense would see the three circumstantial clauses as inseparably connected with verse one, and those viewing the “waw” in a disjunctive sense would, instead, see a separation between these two verses.

 

 

If there is an inseparable connection of the clauses in verse two with verse one, and verse one describes an absolute beginning in relation to the heavens and the earth (God’s actual creation of the heavens and the earth in the beginning), then verse two would have to describe how God created the earth in the beginning (i.e., “without form, and void”).  Understanding the structure of the Hebrew text after this fashion would necessitate viewing that which is described at the beginning of verse two as the condition of the earth at the time of the action described in verse one.  Then the six subsequent days would have to be looked upon as time in which God, step by step, performed and completed his work of creation introduced in verse one.

 

 

The preceding view of the structure of the Hebrew text is the reason for the position held by some that Gen. 1: 1 describes the beginning of God’s restorative work rather than an absolute beginning.  Those holding this view see the three circumstantial clauses in verse two as inseparably connected with verse one, but they also see that Scripture teaches a subsequent ruin of the creation following God’s creation of the heavens and the earth in the beginning (e.g., cf. Gen. 1: 2 and Isa. 45: 18 [the Heb. word tohu, translated “without form” in Gen. 1: 2 is translated “in vain” in Isa. 45: 18; and this verse in Isaiah specifically states that God did not create the earth tohu, i.e., after the fashion in which it is seen in Gen. 1: 2]).

 

 

Thus, those who see God’s perfect creation undergoing a subsequent ruin but also view the three circumstantial clauses in verse two as inseparably connected with verse one are forced into a particular position concerning the interpretation of the opening verses of Genesis.  They are forced into the position of seeing the actual creation of the heavens and the earth, and also the ruin of the heavens and the earth, as occurring at a time prior to Gen. 1: 1, events which they would see as not being dealt with per se in the opening verses of Scripture at all.

 

 

Then there are those grammarians who see the “waw” beginning verse two as disjunctive (similar to the Greek “de which is used both ways in the New Testament [cf. Matt. 1: 2-16; 25: 31, ASV]; also the Septuagint [Gk. translation of the O.T.] uses “de” in a disjunctive sense beginning Gen. 1: 2).  And, viewing the matter after this fashion, there would be no connection between the first two verse of Genesis.  Rather, a separation would exist instead.  Within this view, one would normally see verse one revealing an absolute beginning, with verse two (along with the verses following) revealing events occurring at later points in time.

 

 

(Most holding this linguistic view see verse two as a description of God’s perfect creation [from verse one] being brought into a ruined state, separated from verse one by an unrevealed period of time; and they would, accordingly, see God’s activity during the six days as activity surrounding the restoration of this ruined creation.  Some holding this linguistic view though still see the six days as time revealing God’s creative activity.  They view verse one as describing a “grand summary declaration that God created the universe in the beginning.” Then they view God’s activity during the six days as a revelation concerning how God accomplished that which He had previously stated in verse one.)

 

 

2. THE HEBREW WORD “HAYAH”

 

 

Hayah is the Hebrew word translated “was” in most English versions of Gen. 1: 2 And the earth was…”) The word is found numerous times throughout chapter one and about 3,570 times in the entire Old Testament.

 

 

The etymology of the word is somewhat questionable (most look at the probable primary meaning of hayah as “falling” or “to fall”).  Hebrew scholars though see the word used over and over in the Old Testament in the sense of “to be,” “to become,” or “to come to pass  And through attempts to trace the etymology of the word, comparing the Hebrew with the Arabic (a related Semitic language), and seeing how the word is used in the Old Testament, many scholars have come to look upon the word in the sense of a verb of being to be”).  But scholars also recognize that it is not completely valid to equate the word with the English verb of being after this fashion.

 

 

The word is translated different ways in English versions - e.g., “was” or “were” (Gen. 1: 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, etc.), “be” (Gen. 1: 3, 6, 14, 29, etc.), “became [or, ‘to become’]” (Gen. 2: 7, 10; 3: 22, etc.).  But that’s in English versions.  In the Latin Vulgate there are thirteen instances where hayah has been translated in the sense of “became” in Genesis, chapter one alone (the word appears twenty-seven times in this chapter); and in the Septuagint there are twenty-two such instances in this one chapter.

 

 

The first use of hayah in Scripture is in Gen. 1: 2 - the verse under consideration in this study.  But going beyond this verse for a moment, note how the word is used elsewhere in chapter one.

 

 

Hayah appears twice in verse three, translated “be” and “was  And translating, “Let light be [or ‘become’]: and light became would actually best convey the thought of that which occurred.

 

 

Then note verses 5, 8, 13, 19, 23, 31.  The word hayah appears two times in the latter part of each verse (both translated in the English text by the one word, “were”).  Translating literally from the Hebrew, using “was” in the translation, the text would read, “... And there was evening and there was morning, [comprising] the first day ... the second day ... the third day etc.

 

 

Actually though, “became” would really better convey the thought surrounding that which occurred, for evening and morning came to pass, “became comprising each of the six different days.  Leupold appears to capture the overall thought quite well in his commentary by translating, “...Then came evening, then came morning - the first day ... the second day ... the third day etc.

 

 

Then note the words, “...and it was so at the end of verses 7, 9, 11, 15, 24, 30.  “Was” in each reference is a translation of the word hayah, and it is easy to see that “became” rather than “was” would really provide a better description of that which occurred in each instance, translating, “...and it became so” (cf. “Let there be [a translation of hayah]...” [vv. 3, 6, 14]).

 

 

Though hayah has been translated “was,” “were or “be” throughout the first chapter of Genesis, the word is actually used mainly throughout this chapter in the sense of “be,” “became or “had become  Attention is called to this fact because numerous individuals look at the translation “became [or ‘had become’]” as so rare in the Old Testament that serious consideration should not be given to the thought of translating Gen. 1: 2, “And [or ‘But’] the earth became [or ‘had become’]...”  But the rarity is in the English translations, not in a literal Hebrew rendering or in certain other translations (e.g., in the KJV there are only 17 instances in all of Genesis where hayah has been translated “became [or, ‘...become’]” [2: 7, 10; 3: 22; 9: 15; 18: 18; 19: 26; 20: 12; 21: 20; 24: 67; 32: 10; 34: 16; 37: 20; 47: 20, 26; 48: 19]; but in the Septuagint there are at least 146 instances [and some 1,500 in the entire O.T.]).

 

 

3. THE HEBREW TEXT ALONE

 

 

Can linguistic questions surrounding the first two verses of Genesis be resolved from the Hebrew text alone? Can one determine from the Hebrew text alone whether the “waw” beginning verse two is conjunctive or disjunctive?  Or can one determine from the Hebrew text alone how the word hayah should be translated in verse two?  Or can one determine from the Hebrew structure of verse two alone how the remainder of the first chapter should be understood in an overall sense?

 

 

Some Hebrew scholars would answer in the affirmative, but because of the different ways a number of Hebrew scholars view the matter at hand, the issue could only be resolved within their minds and possibly within the minds of others who follow their same line of reasoning.  And note that the issue would be resolved by different scholars after entirely different fashions, all based on their understanding of the grammatical structure of the Hebrew text.

 

 

However, there is another way to approach the matter; and that other way is to see how the whole of Scripture deals with the issue at hand.  If the whole of Scripture can be shown to support one view alone - which it can - then the correct linguistic understanding of Gen. 1: 2 and the corresponding correct interpretation of chapter one can easily and unquestionably be demonstrated.

 

 

This is not to say that Gen. 1: 2 or the first chapter of Genesis as a whole cannot be understood correctly apart from first going to the remainder of Scripture, for that cannot be the case.  God would not have begun His revelation to man after a fashion which man could not have understood a part from subsequent revelation (requiring approx. 1,500 years to complete).  But this is to say that the correct linguistic position for Gen. 1: 2 and the correct corresponding interpretation of the entire chapter - which can be shown by going to the remainder of Scripture - is a position which God would have expected man to see as evident when he began reading at this point in Genesis, though man many times does not do so.

 

 

Thus, in this respect, a knowledge of the way in which the Hebrew text is structured is really not going to resolve the issue at hand.  And time has been spent in the Hebrew construction of Gen. 1: 2 and other related passages, not in an attempt to resolve the issue, but to demonstrate two basic things: (a) There are good, reputable Hebrew scholars who hold varying views on the opening verses of Genesis, which are many times based strictly on their understanding of the structure of the Hebrew text, apart from contextual considerations; and (b) though the linguistics of the Hebrew text (within the different ways scholars understand the text) will support any one of these views, all but one are out of line with the remainder of Scripture and are, consequently, wrong.

 

 

That is to say, though different views can be supported from the structure of the Hebrew text alone, different views cannot be supported when the remainder of Scripture is taken into consideration -  with or without the Hebrew text.  Scripture will support only one view. …

 

 

Scripture will support “Creation” (an absolute creation [v. 1]), a “Ruin” of the creation (which means that the “waw” beginning v. 2 must be understood in a disjunctive sense [‘But’], and the Hebrew word hayah must be understood in the sense of “became [or ‘had become’]” [v. 2a]), a “Restoration” of the ruined creation (performed entirely through Divine intervention [vv. 2b-25]), and “Time” (six days of restorative work, followed by one day of rest [1: 2b-2: 3]).

 

 

And to illustrate this is not difficult at all.  In fact, the opposite is true.  It is a very simple matter to illustrate, from other Scripture, exactly how the opening verses of Genesis must be understood.

 

 

DAYS IN SCRIPTURE

 

 

The structure of God’s revelation to man will be set forth briefly under three headings, and material discussed under these three headings will relate specifically to how particular sections of Scripture handle the matter at hand.  Then attention will be called to other related Scriptures outside these sections to better present the overall picture from the whole of Scripture.

 

 

1. THE SIGN OF THE SABBATH

 

 

The Sabbath was a sign of “a perpetual covenant  God stated concerning the Sabbath, “It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever [Heb. ‘olam’ i.e. for the ‘age to come’ (Heb. 6: 5, R.V.)]*: for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed” (Ex. 31: 16, 17).  When giving the Sabbath to Israel (cf. Ex. 20: 11) or referring to the Sabbath rest awaiting the people of God in Hebrews, in each instance, for a very good reason, God called attention to that which occurred in Gen. 1, 2.  There is a latter work of restoration, followed by rest, which is based on the former; and the Sabbath was given to Israel to keep this thought ever before the nation.

 

[* See “The Dualism of Eternal Life” by S. S. Craig.]

 

 

That is, though the sign of the Sabbath concerned a present work and future [millennial] rest, it was based on a past work and rest.  God worked six days to restore a ruined creation in the opening chapter of Genesis; and on the sixth day, along with the completion of His work of restoration, He brought man into existence to rule over the restored material creation. Then God rested on the seventh day.  But a ruin ensued once again.  Man, an entirely new creation in the universe, fell; and, as a result, the restored material creation was brought under a curse, leaving God with two ruined creations: man, and the material creation.

 

 

With that in mind, how did God, in the Genesis account, set about to restore these two ruined creations?  The answer is not only clearly revealed but it is also very simple.  According to Scripture, God set about to restore the subsequent ruined creations in exactly the same manner as He had restored the former ruined creation in the opening chapter of Genesis.  He set about to restore the ruined creations over six days of time, and He, in accord with Gen. 2: 2, 3, would then rest on the seventh [Millennial and Messianic (2 Pet. 3: 8,. Cf. Ps. 2: 8; 110: 1-3; Lk. 1: 32, R.V.] ‘day’.

 

 

The latter restoration must occur in complete keeping with the former restoration.  A pattern has been set in the opening verses of Genesis which cannot change.  The latter restoration must occur over a six-day period.  And also in accord with this pattern there must be a day of rest following the six days of work.

 

 

The Sabbath was given to Israel to keep the thought ever before the nation that God, in accord with the opening verses of Genesis, was going to once again rest for one day following six days of work to effect the restoration of that which is presently in a ruined state (both man and the material creation).  The Sabbath was a “sign and a sign in Scripture points to something beyond itself.  The Sabbath points to a seventh-day rest which God will enter into with His people (“the people of God” in Heb. 4: 9) following six previous days of restorative work.

 

 

Each day in the former restoration and rest was twenty-four hours in length, but each day in the latter restoration and rest is revealed to be one thousand years in length (2 Peter 1: 16-18; 3: 3-8; cf. Matt. 16: 28-17: 5).  Based on the pattern set forth in Gen. 1, 2, God is going to work for six thousand years during the present restoration and then rest the seventh one-thousand-year period.

 

 

Scripture begins by laying the basis for this septenary arrangement of time in the opening verses (Gen. 1, 2), this is something seen throughout Scripture (Ex. 31: 13-17; Num. 19: 12; Hosea 5: 15- 6: 2; Jonah 1: 17; Matt. 17: 1; Luke 24: 21; John 1: 29, 35, 43; 2: 1; 5: 9; 9: 14; 11: 6, 7; Heb. 4: 1, 4, 9), and this is the way God concludes His revelation surrounding time immediately prior to the eternal ages (Rev. 20: 4-6).

 

 

Scripture deals with 7,000 years of time - time extending from the restoration of the earth and the creation of man to the end of the Messianic Kingdom.  Scripture has very little to say about what occurred prior to these 7,000 years, and it also has very little to say about what will occur following these 7,000 years.  Scripture is built on this septenary arrangement of time, which is based on the opening two chapters of Genesis; and this is an evident fact which must be recognized if one would correctly understand God’s redemptive plans and purposes which He has revealed in His Word.

 

 

2. THE SIGNS IN JOHN’S GOSPEL

 

 

The Gospel of John is built around seven signs; and, as in the sign of the Sabbath, the signs in this gospel point to things beyond the signs themselves.

 

 

It is the Jews who require a sign (1 Cor. 1: 22); and these signs, taken from numerous signs which Jesus performed during His earthly ministry, are directed (as was His ministry in that day) to the Jewish people. Jesus performed such signs for one central purpose: “...that ye [the Jews] might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name” (John 20: 30, 31; cf. John 2: 11; 5: 46, 47; 6: 14, 21; 11: 45).

 

 

Six of the seven signs in John’s gospel were performed in connection with particular days, all in perfect keeping with one another, all in perfect keeping with the sign of the Sabbath, and all in perfect keeping with the septenary arrangement of Scripture.  And all of the signs refer, after different fashions, to the same thing. They all refer to Israel’s coming salvation and restoration.

 

 

The first sign, in 2: 1-11, has to do with Jesus turning the water in six waterpots to wine (“six,” man’s number; the waterpots made from the earth, as man; filled with water [the Word]; and through Divine intervention a change ensues).  This sign, pointing to the future salvation of Israel, occurred on the seventh day (1: 29, 35, 43; 11), which is when [the people of] Israel will be saved yet future.

 

 

The second sign, in 4: 40-54, has to do with the healing of a nobleman’s son.  This sign occurred after Jesus had spent two days with the Samaritans, on the third day (vv. 40, 43).  It will be after two days visiting “the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name on the third day, that Jesus will return to the Jewish people and the nation will be healed (cf. Hosea 5: 15 - 6: 2; Acts 15: 14-8).

 

 

The third sign, in 5: 1-9, has to do with a man being healed. This occurred after thirty-eight years, on the Sabbath (vv. 5, 9). The reference (in the type) would be to the healing of the nation through the second generation of Israelites being allowed to enter the land under Joshua after thirty-eight years (dating from [their apostasy and] the overthrow at Kadesh-Barnea), referring to that time (in the antitype) when the nation will be healed and be allowed to enter the land under Christ, an event which will occur on the seventh day, the Sabbath.

 

 

The fourth sign, in 6: 1-14, has to do with bread being provided for the multitudes; and the sign occurred in connection with the Passover (v. 4).  Jesus is that “bread of life” which will be provided for the nation yet future (v. 35), and the Passover is the festival in Lev. 23 which has to do with the future salvation of Israel, when the nation will receive the true “bread of life  Israel has slain the Lamb (cf. Ex. 12: 6; Acts 2: 36; 3: 14, 15), but the nation has vet to appropriate the blood (cf. Ex. 12: 7, 13; Zech. 12: 10; Rom. 11: 26).

 

 

The fifth sign, in 6: 15-21, has to do with Christ’s departure, a storm, His return, the disciples’ attitude toward Him at this time, and the geographical location in which they subsequently found themselves.  It points to Christ’s departure from Israel two thousand years ago (v. 15), the coming Tribulation (vv. 16-18), Christ’s return (vv. 19, 20), the nation receiving Him (v. 21a), and the nation’s restoration to the land (v. 21b).  This is the only sign giving no specific reference to particular days, but the chronology must be understood in the light of the other six signs.

 

 

The sixth sign, in 9: 1-41, has to do with the healing of a blind man, on the Seventh day (v. 14).  This points to Israel’s future deliverance from her blindness (Rom. 11: 25), which will occur on the seventh day, the Sabbath.  Or, as in Luke 24:13-31, it will occur after two days (dating from the crucifixion), on the third day (v. 21).

 

 

The seventh sign, in 11: 1-44, has to do with the resurrection of Lazarus.  This [select]* resurrection occurred after Jesus had been out of the land of Judea two days, on the third day (vv. 6, 7), after Lazarus had lain in the grave four days (v. 17).  This points to Israel’s future resurrection (Ezek. 37:12-14; Dan. 12: 2) after two days, on the third day; and at this time Israel will have been in the place of death [i.e., in the underworld of ‘Sheol’ / ‘Hades.’ (Lk. 16: 23; Acts 2: 27, 34; 7: 4, 5. cf. 2 Tim. 2: 18; Rev. 6: 9-11, R.V.] four days, dating four millenniums back to Abraham.

 

[* See Phil. 3: 11. cf. Rev. 20: 4-6 with Acts 7: 4, 5; Heb. 10: 40; 11: 35b, R.V. etc.]

 

 

3. THE STRUCTURE OF 2 PETER

 

 

2 Peter parallels Jude in the sense that both deal with the Word of the Kingdom and apostasy after a similar fashion.

 

 

Both epistles begin the same way.  The first chapter of 2 Peter is taken up with that which is stated in one verse in Jude (v. 3).  Then the matter of apostasy is dealt with throughout most of the remainder of both epistles. However, there are things dealt with in the first and third chapters of 2 Peter, showing the septenary structure of the epistle, which are not dealt with at all in Jude.

 

 

Peter exhorts his readers to make their “calling [pertaining to the kingdom] and electionselection’ for a position of power and authority in the kingdom] sure” (1: 1-15); and Jude states the same thing in Jude 3 when he exhorts his readers to “earnestly contend forstrive with respect to’] the faith” (cf. 1 Tim. 6: 12; 2 Tim. 4: 7, 8).  Then the thought of apostasy relative to “the faith” comes into view in both epistles.

 

 

However, Peter does something which Jude does not do.  Before beginning his dissertation on apostasy he calls attention to that which occurred on the Mount in Matt. 17: 1-8 (2 Peter 1: 16-18), which has to do with the Son of Man coming in His kingdom, after six days, on the seventh day (cf. Matt. 16: 28 - 17: 1).

 

 

Then toward the end of his epistle, Peter, unlike Jude, moves from thoughts surrounding apostasy to thoughts surrounding the existence and subsequent destruction of the heavens and the earth at two different times - (a) at a time following the creation of the heavens and the earth “the heavens ... of old” and “the world that then was [the world existing at the time of ‘the heavens ... of old’]” [vv. 5, 6]), and (b) at a time following the restoration of the heavens and the earth the heavens and the earth which are now” [v. 7]).

 

 

The destruction of the former is seen in Gen. 1: 2aBut the earth had become without form, and void; and darkness [the sun had ceased to give its light] was upon the face of the deep [‘the raging waters’]” and the destruction of the latter - a destruction by fire - is seen in succeeding verses in 2 Peter 3: 10ff).

 

 

Peter then draws the entire matter to a climax by stating that “one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (3: 8).  Understood contextually, the verse is self-explanatory.  “The heavens and the earth, which are now” (v. 7) must cover the entire septenary period from chapter one (vv. 16-18), else 2 Peter 3: 8 would be meaningless.  And each day in this period is revealed to be one thousand years in length - six millenniums of work, followed by one millennium of rest, based on the opening verses of Genesis.

 

 

CONCLUDING REMARKS:

 

 

Viewing the whole of Scripture, the correct interpretation of the opening verses of Genesis can be clearly and unquestionably presented through the typical nature of Old Testament history (1 Cor. 10: 6, 11), as it is set forth in the very evident Divinely established septenary arrangement of Scripture.  And these opening verses, providing the Divinely established basis for that which follows, must be understood accordingly.

 

 

The Bible is a book of redemption; and only a correct view of the opening verses of Genesis can reflect positively, at the very outset, on God’s redemptive message as a whole (the restoration of a ruined creation, performed in its entirety through Divine intervention, for a revealed purpose).

 

 

An incorrect view can, on the other hand, only have negative ramifications.  Creation alone, apart from a ruin and restoration of the creation, fails to convey the complete message; and Restoration alone (viewing the opening verse as other than an absolute beginning), apart from a record of the preceding creation and ruin, likewise fails to convey the complete message.

 

 

It is as F. W. Grant stated years ago: “The thought of a ruined condition of the earth succeeding its original creation … is … required by the typical view [man’s creation, ruin, and subsequent restoration paralleling the earth’s creation, ruin, and subsequent restoration].”

 

 

Accordingly, the opening verses of Genesis cannot deal strictly with Creation; nor can these verses deal strictly with Restoration.  Either view would be out of line with the whole of Scripture, beginning with the central theme of Scripture, the message of redemption.

 

 

The only interpretative view which will fit - at all points - within the Divinely established septenary arrangement of Scripture (which has it basis in these opening verses) is…

 

 

Creation (an absolute creation [v. 1])

 

 

A Ruin of the Greation (v. 2a).

 

 

A Restoration of the Ruined Creation (vv. 2b-25).

 

 

Time (in the type - six days of restorative work, followed by a day of rest; in the antitype - six thousand years of restorative work, followed by one thousand years of rest [1: 2b - 2: 3]).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

177

 

Let Us Labour Therefore...

 

 

BY ARLEN L CHITWOOD

 

 

Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest,

lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

 

 

 

The rest lying before Christians is spoken of different ways in Scripture.  It is a rest typified by the rest which lay before the Israelites under Moses, and later under Joshua (Heb. 3: 7-19; 4: 6-8; cf. Deut. 12: 9; Joshua 1: 13); it is a rest referred to by the sign of the Sabbath (Heb. 4: 9; cf. Ex. 31: 13-17), and a rest which has its basis in the opening two chapters of Genesis (Heb. 4: 4; cf. Gen. 2: 1-3; Ex. 20: 11; 31: 17).

 

 

This is a rest into which one can enter only after he has entered the land to which he has been called (that heavenly [and millennial] land for Christians, typified by the earthly land for Israel).  Further, this is a rest into which one can enter only after the enemy inhabiting the land has been overthrown (Satan and his angels in the heavenly land, typified by the Gentile nations infiltrated by the Nephilim in the earthly land).  And this is a rest into which one can enter only after six days, on the seventh day (that is, after six millenniums, on the seventh millennium).  The latter has to do with the sign of the Sabbath, which, in turn, is based on the opening two chapters of Genesis; and this is that rest to which Joshua looked when he spoke of “another day” (Heb. 4: 8; cf. vv. 4, 9).

 

 

Thus, the rest which Christians are to labour to enter into has to do with a future rest which can be realized only during the earth’s coming Sabbath (the seventh millennium); and this rest can be realized only in that heavenly land to which Christians have been called, after the enemy presently inhabiting the land has been overthrown.

 

 

We are to labour to enter into rest in that heavenly land, “lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief” (Heb. 4: 11; cf. v. 1).  The allusion, of course, is to the experiences of the Israelites under Moses. They failed to enter into the rest set before them “because of unbeliefunfaithfulness’]” (Heb. 3: 18).  And the warning to [regenerate] Christians under Christ is that exactly the same fate can likewise befall them.  They too, through unfaithfulness, can fail to enter into the rest set before them.

 

 

In the type, those comprising the house of Moses had been called out of the land of Egypt to inhabit an earthly land removed from Egypt, the land of Canaan.  All activity in the house was for a purpose.  There was a goal in view.  But an entire unfaithful generation was overthrown short of this goal.  Those comprising this generation were cut off from the house of Moses, overthrown in the wilderness on the right side of the blood but on the wrong side of the goal of their calling (Num. 13: 31-33; 14: 29, 30).

 

 

Caleb and Joshua alone, of that generation, were singled out as exercising faith relative to their calling.  And Caleb and Joshua alone were singled out as being allowed to later enter the land, conquer the inhabitants, and realize an inheritance in the land (Num. 13: 30; 14: 30; Joshua 14: 13, 14; 19: 49, 50).

 

 

And in the antitype, the purpose for and end result of activity in the house of Christ can only be the same as the purpose for and end result of activity in the house of Moses.  The antitype demands this, for the antitype must follow the type in exact detail.  Christians have been saved for a purpose, and that purpose has to do with the land set before them.  All activity in which household servants have been called to engage themselves during the present time, after some fashion, has to do with this purpose.  There is a goal in view, and that goal has to do with the heavenly [millennial] land to which Christians have been called.

 

 

A servant in the house of Christ can exhibit either faithfulness or unfaithfulness, as clearly set forth by the actions of those comprising the house of Moses.  And also, as clearly set forth by the actions of those comprising the house of Moses, faithful servants will one day realize the goal of their calling, but not so with unfaithful servants.

 

 

Faithful servants will pass through the same experiences in the antitype as did Caleb and Joshua in the type. They will be allowed to enter the land, victoriously combat the inhabitants (Eph. 6: 12ff), and one day realize an inheritance therein (Eph. 1: 11-23).  Christians exhibiting faithfulness after this fashion will one day realize the rights of the firstborn, inheriting as joint-heirs and ruling as co-heirs with God’s Son (Rom. 8: 17, 18; 2 Tim. 2: 10-12; Rev. 3: 21).

 

 

Unfaithful servants though will be cut off from the house of Christ, as unfaithful Israelites were cut off from the house of Moses (Heb. 4: 1).  They, as the unfaithful Israelites in relation to their earthly calling, will not be allowed to enter that heavenly land and realize an inheritance therein.  They, as the unfaithful Israelites, will be overthrown on the right side of the blood but on the wrong side of the goal of their calling (Matt. 24: 48-51; 2 Tim. 2: 5, 12b).

 

 

If the preceding is not what is meant by the exhortation and warning in Heb. 4: 11, then, from a Scriptural framework, no meaning can really be derived from this verse.  The verse must be understood within a type-antitype framework in the light of its immediate context, which begins with chapter three.  And this section of Scripture leading into Heb. 4: 11 has to do with the Israelites under Moses, Christians under Christ, and a [millennial] rest lying before both.

 

 

“Let us [Christians] labour therefore to enter into that rest [seventh-day rest, Sabbath rest], lest any man [Christian] fall after the same example of unbeliefunfaithfulness’ exhibited by the Israelites under Moses, which can also be exhibited by Christians under Christ].”

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

178

 

AN EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE

TO THE HEBREWS

 

 

BY ROBERT GOVETT, M.A.

 

 

Heb. 10: 30

 

 

 

“The Lord shall judge His People  Then the offenders here I described were of His people.  And believers in Christ are one day to be judged.  But many now refuse this doctrine.  It is not .pleasant.  How then do they get rid of this passage?  They say, or hint, that in Deuteronomy it means, that God would avenge Israel on their foes: for the next words are: “And will repent Himself for His servants  But the following words cannot dictate the sense of the previous words.  Not once does the Apostle speak, throughout the Epistle, of God’s avenging the believer on his foes.  That is Old Testament feeling.  Jehovah’s repentance on behalf of His servants is another phase of judgment, after He had judged His people.  So in the parable of the Pounds.  The servants are first judged; then the foes.  The Holy Spirit is here warning [regenerate] believers against apostasy; and in that view only, is the citation to the point.  Moreover, in this Epistle, unlike most of the others, the people of God are regarded as one, despite the differences between those of the old covenant and the new, which appear so prominently in the epistles to the Ephesians and Galatians.

 

 

But the truth taught does not rest on the citation from Deuteronomy alone.  It is found also in Psa. 135: 14, and in Psa. 50.  God is in this latter place described as coming, and citing earth to appear before Himself the judge. “He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that He may judge His People.  Gather My saints together unto Me; those that have made a covenant with Me by sacrifice.  And the heavens shall declare His righteousness: for God is judge Himself” (Psa. 50: 4-6).  We shall come again on the same subject in chap. 12: 24.

 

 

How - should we understand - “David executed judgment and justice to all his people”? (2 Sam. 8: 15; 1 Chron. 18: 14).  “Dan shall judge his people as one of the tribes of Israel” (Gen. 49: 16).  “That thou mayest judge My people, over whom I have made thee king” (2 Chron. 1: 11).

 

 

To whom did God address His commandments of Sinai?  To Egyptians?  Nay, but to His redeemed people.  To whom then did the penalties on disobedience apply?  The history, no less than the drift of the argument here, shows, that God’s judging His people does not mean His avenging Himself on the disobedient ones of the tribes who tempted Him. God, and His Christ, are Lords of the saved.  And here we learn, that they are to give account to Him, not as lost sinners, but as saved, and as servants.

 

 

“It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God

 

 

This is a reference to Jehovah’s judgment on Dathan and his party.  Paul has touched on the vengeance that fell upon Korah and his princes, because of their refusal of God’s high priest.  Fire came forth from the Lord the judge, and devoured those adversaries.* But another form of death awaited the refusers of the Apostle and Leader of Israel.  Moses warns the congregation to leave the neighbourhood of Dathan, lest they should be overtaken in the same punishment.  The majority listened, and came away, and there was an awful pause. Jehovah Himself would plead the cause of His mediator, whom these sinners had falsely accused. “If the Lord make a new thing, and the earth open her mouth, and swallow them up, with all that appertain to them, and they go down quick [alive] into the pit [Hadees]; then ye shall understand that these men have provoked the Lord  Then the “ground clave asunder that was under them: and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up, and their houses, and all the men that appertained to Korah, and all their goods.  They, and all that appertained to them, went down alive into the pit, and the earth closed upon them: and they perished from among the congregation” (Num. 16).  That was to fall into the hands of God, provoked at their sin.  And it was fearful, not merely to the actual criminals but to all Israel, who fled at their terrified screams.

 

 

That was the closing of the prison-door on these evil-doers.   But God lives for ever; a terror to His [apostate] foes, as well as bliss to His friends.  It is a joyful thing to serve the living God, and to be admitted at last to dwell with Him in His city of life (chap. 12: 24).  But how fearful to [all unregenerate souls] be sentenced to His lake that burns with fire and brimstone; whose flames He suffers not to be quenched, long as Himself shall live!  For “the living God” has the “keys of Hadees and of Death The offender here first provokes God, and then falls into His hands of indignation.

 

 

32. “But remember the former days, in which, after ye were enlightened, ye endured a great wrestling of sufferings; partly, while ye were made a gazing-stock both by reproaches and afflictions; and partly, while ye became partakers of those that were so treated.  For, moreover, ye sympathised with my chains, and took joyfully the plundering of your goods, knowing that ye have for yourselves a better and abiding substance in heaven.  Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great reward

 

 

Here is a sudden change of person, from ‘we’ and ‘us,’ to ‘you’ and ‘ye  Wherefore?  Because, in the preceding verses the writer, occupied the same ground with those he was addressing.  But now he severs himself from them.  Why?  If Paul be the writer, this is at once explained; for, at the beginning of the Church at Jerusalem, he was not among the persecuted, but was the chief persecutor; and, after his conversion, the Church enjoyed a season of peace (Acts 9: 31).  But when converted, his turn of suffering speedily came; and, therefore he tells of his “bonds  Here, then, is a threefold cord, in proof of Paul’s authorship, within a very short space - and “a threefold cord is not soon broken

 

 

The warnings and the encouragements are addressed to the same parties.  Paul does not say: ‘The warnings do not apply to the true-hearted among you; but to [unregenerate] ‘professors’ who have crept in among you.’ A likely time, indeed, for ‘professors’ to seek to creep in! or to stay there, if they were in already!

 

 

The same [regenerate] believers are addressed; and now they are encouraged to look on the other side, and to hold to the path which they chose so many years ago.  It was then between thirty and forty years since the Gospel began to be published at Jerusalem, and some of them were probably among the first-fruits of that day of the Holy Ghost’s power.  In that day, the enmity of the human heart, stirred up against them, had entailed shame, suffering, losses.  With the new light of God [and His accountability truths and conditional promises]** came a new struggle of evil against good.  But that new light showed a better and brighter field and heritage in heaven than Moses knew of.  The Saviour promised to come, and reward royally the sufferers for His sake.  ‘You once trusted His words.  You stood by those who suffered, when to do so involved like treatment.  You bore, with courage and confidence, the onsets of the foe, when directed against your selves.’ Peace with God brings war with the devil and his men.

 

 

Notice here the remarkable contrast between the men of the earthly calling, and of the heavenly.  When Israel was led out of Egypt, under the old mediator, they marched with high hand all strong, laden with spoil, exalted in the eyes of their former oppressors, not even a dog barking at them.  Then the disciples of Christ were exposed to scoffs, injuries, and loss of the good Lands and inheritance given them by the Law.

 

 

Against these troubles they were to be upheld by confidence in the promises of God concerning the day of reward.  Your trials are only those to which men of God in previous dispensations were exposed; and out of which, rightly met, they gained God’s approval; and for them glory is laid up.

 

 

“Ye sympathized with my chains  Some read: “Ye sympathized with the Prisoners  Which is the true reading?  The ordinary one, I believe.  “My chains” proved too forcibly the Epistle to be Paul’s to suit the tastes of some.  Hence it is omitted from the Vulgate, Rome at first refusing the Epistle.  Moreover, an internal proof is found in the thirteenth chapter (ver. 3).  “Remember those that are in bonds, as bound with them Now, it seems clear that the writer does not first commend them for sympathy towards Christ’s prisoners, and then, without a word of limitation or of explanation, urge the duly on them.

 

 

Here, then, is strong evidence that the writer is Paul.  He often names the bonds he suffered for Christ (Eph. 3: 1; 4: 1; 2 Tim. 1: 8; 2: 9; Philem. 9-13; Phil. 1:  7, 13, 14, 16, [17]). “Remember my bonds.  Grace be with you” (Col. 4: 18).

 

 

This, then, takes us back to Paul’s two years’ imprisonment at Caesara.  And here we find notices which confirm the view.  After Felix had heard Paul, he commanded the centurion that Paul should he kept a prisoner, but that he should have relaxation, and that none of his friends should be hindered from waiting on him, or coming to him.  He had several interviews with his prisoner, hoping that money would be given by Paul, that he might be set free (Acts 24: 23-27).

 

 

-------

 

 

* “All evangelical Christians (probably all Christians) are agreed that our conduct after conversion - our stewardship - will, to some measure, evoke approval or disapproval in our Lord on His return, and will therefore modify any tangible evidences of His pleasure (or displeasure) which He may be pleased to bestow: the degree of that approval or disapproval, with its consequent measure of reward or loss, is the only point in debate.  Far more overwhelming than most [regenerate believers] realize are the cumulate Scripture proofs that, while eternal life, irrevocable and a ‘free gift’, is dependant on simple, saving faith alone, accompanied by such conduct as proves the reality of the faith, - the Millennial Kingdom (or its synonym, ‘the First Resurrection’) is one of the numerous rewards contingent on sanctification, in which our Lord will delight to compensate the spotless robe and the martyred life.  In view of the vast possibilities latent in the subject hitherto never adequately threshed out in the Church of Christ, it is obvious that the only wise attitude is a calm, reverent, prayerful, sane investigation…”

 

 

 

** “How many things one learns - and how many are unlearned! - in 15 years.  In 1925 we bid you mark, with us, that “if so be that (we) may lay hold”, that “if by any means (we) may attain  Mark it well: something to gain - or lose; an ‘inheritance’ to enjoy - or forfeit; a goal to be reached - or missed; a ‘prize’ to be won or lost.  That “IF” is spilled over all the pages of Scripture, and the Saviour has been pressing on, so hard, yet so tenderly, the implication of this “IF” in all its bearings.  Almost the tiniest word - “IF”; involving almost the mightiest issues.

 

 

What a precious thing it is that some things are inviolable!  Our “life is hid with CHRIST IN GOD”, and is inviolable, depending not upon us, but upon HIM.  To be “born from above” is to “pass from death unto life” and to come into possession of the life of the ages, which “shall never perish”.  But we are called of The LORD “unto His own Kingdom and Glory”, and this reign with CHRIST is clearly forfeitable.  This privileged service of the coming Age is something for which He seeks to discipline and train us here, and He shows clearly that some of His own redeemed ones “shall inherit” and “enter the Kingdom”, while others “shall not inherit”, being “not fit for the Kingdom”, in a day which seems to be coming on apace.  Of resurrection to meet and live with the LORD he was certain (1 Thess 4.), but if the “out-resurrection” unto a priestly-reign with the LORD he said “not already attained, not yet laid hold” (Phil 3.).  This goal of the upward calling of GOD in CHRIST JESUS was the purpose for which he had been laid hold of by CHRIST, and so urgent was it that he “press on - unto the prize”, the out-resurrection and the [Millennial] Kingdom and glory, that he counted but offal what is everything to most, and held his body in utter subjection and control, lest having preached to others he should himself be rejected.

 

 

It would serve to much spiritual enlightenment and quickening if the LORD’S people underlined in their Bibles, the ‘IF’ and ‘IF NOT’ addressed so often to believers, and sought the Spirit’s unveiling of a full import of what they mark.  There is an increase of travail in the Church, to-day, for a company to be found worthy in the day of His coming, and those whose spirits cry to GOD for manifestation, and who wait for the birth, are keenest in their longing to be found ready, and among the profitable servants.  Child of God, will you seek to know your relation to these things?” - GEORGE BANKS.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

179

 

A QUESTION AND ANSWER

 

 

BY G. H. LANG

 

 

 

QUESTION - Are not all true Christians caught up when Jesus comes?  If not, who will be left behind?  Jesus said, “Pray that you might be counted worthy to escape...”  What does that mean?

 

 

ANSWER - “Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass and to stand before the Son of man Luke 21: 36.

 

 

 

The two preceding verses (Luke 21: 4, 35) clarify this admonition.  The people of God are cautioned against being careless in their Christian experience.  The inference is that conditions will be such that many will grow careless and drift along with the spirit of the times.  Weymouth’s translation says, “Take heed to yourselves, lest your souls be weighed down with self-indulgence and drunkenness or the anxieties of this life  These very dangers are present to-day, and are very likely to continue through to the Rapture.

 

 

Money is plentiful.  Drink, drug abuse, gambling, gluttony and smoking by both sexes make these evils popular.  Self-indulgence of every description is practised.  Thousands of Christians have been swept from their moorings during the past few years.  Prayer is neglected, consequently there is a general decline in spirituality.  We are told to pray that we may be fully strengthened to escape all these evil things and be able to take our place in the presence of the Son of Man.

 

 

The foolish virgins, and all those who have grown careless in their Christian experience, are in a declining spiritual condition and will be left behind.  Moffatt states that those who fail to keep awake and pray, that day will catch them suddenly as a trap.  How contrary is this teaching of our Lord to his disciples, from that of those who expect all will to be caught up before the end days; and from those who expect all will have to endure them!

 

 

There are two principal views on the Rapture and the Tribulation: one, that the Parousia will commence prior to the Times of the End, and that at its inception all believers of the heavenly calling, dead and living, will be taken to the presence of the Lord in the air; the other, that the Parousia will occur at the close of the Great Tribulation, until when no believers will be raised or changed.  The one view says that no believers will go into the End Times the other that none then living will escape them.

 

 

The one involves that the utmost measure of unfaithfulness or carnality in a believer puts him in no peril of forfeiting the supreme honour of rapture or of having to endure the dread End Days: the other view involves that no degree of faithfulness or of holiness will enable a saint to escape those Days.  As regards this matter, godliness and unfaithfulness seem immaterial on either view; which raises a doubt of both views.

 

 

1. Our Lord Jesus Christ has declared distinctly that escape is possible.  In Luke 21 is a record of instruction given by Him to four apostles on the Mount of Olives.  It is a parallel report to Matthew 24 & 25 and Mark 13, and it deals specifically with the Times of the End and His Parousia.  He foretold great international wars, accompanied with earthquakes, famines and pestilences, to be followed by terrors and great signs from heaven (vv. 10, 11: compare with the Seven Seals of 1-4, Revelation 6).

 

 

These things are to be preceded by a general persecution of His followers (verse 12), which will be the first indication that the End Days are at hand.  Then Jerusalem is to be trodden down by the Gentiles right on until the Times of the Gentiles run out (verse 24: comp. Revelation 11: 2, where the same term “trodden down” is used, and Zechariah 14: 1-5).  This shows that it is the End-times of which Christ is speaking, as is further shown by His earlier statement that at that time of vengeance “all things that are written” shall be fulfilled.  All things that are written in the prophets concerning Jerusalem, Israel, and the Gentiles were not by any means fulfilled at the destruction of Jerusalem in AD. 70.

 

 

Then He mentions the disturbances in nature and the fears of mankind that are grouped under seal 6 in Revelation 6: 12-17, and adds explicitly that “then shall they see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory and that when these things begin His disciples may know that their redemption draweth nigh (ver. 27, 28).

 

 

In concluding this outline of the period of the Beast the Lord then uttered this exhortation and promise: “But take heed to yourselves, lest haply your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and that day come on you suddenly as a snare: for so shall it come upon all them that dwell on the face of all the earth.  But watch ye at every season, making supplication, that ye may prevail to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man

 

 

This declares distinctly:

 

 

1. That escape is possible from all those things of which Christ had been speaking, that is, from the whole End-times.

 

 

2. That, that day of testing will be universal, and unavoidable by any then on the earth, which involves the removal from the earth of any who are to escape it.

 

 

3. That there is a fearful peril of disciples becoming worldly of heart and so being, enmeshed in that last period.

 

 

4. That hence it is needful to watch and to pray ceaselessly, that so we may prevail over all obstacles and dangers and thus escape that era.

 

 

This most important and unequivocal statement by our Lord sets aside the opinion that all Christians will escape irrespective of their moral state, and also negatives the notion that no escape is possible.  There is a door of escape; but as with all doors, only those who are awake will see it, and only those who are in earnest will reach it ere the storm bursts.  In every place in the New Testament the word “escape” has its natural force - to flee out of a place of trouble and be quite clear thereof.  It never means to endure the trial successfully.  In this very discourse of the Lord it is in contrast with the statement, “He that endureth to the end (of these things) the same shall be saved” (Matthew 24: 13).  One escapes, another endures.

 

 

The attempt to evade the application of this passage to Christians on the plea that it refers to “Jewish” disciples of Christ is baseless:

 

 

a. No “Jewish” disciples of Christ are known to the Scriptures (Galatians 3: 28; Ephesians. 2: 14-18).

 

 

b. The God-fearing remnant of Israel of the End-days will in no wise escape these things that shall come to pass (Malachi 3: 1-4; Zechariah 13: 8, 9; Jeremiah 30: 7, 8).

 

 

c. Nor will they believe on Jesus as their Messiah until they see Him coming in glory (Zechariah 12: 9, 10; 13: 6; Matthew 23: 29).

 

 

d. The assertion that the title Son of Man is “Jewish” is equally unwarranted, for the term “man” is necessarily universal to the race, and does not belong peculiarly to any one nation. (Compare John 3: 14, 15; 5: 25-29: “whosoever” and “all”)

 

 

2. In harmony with this utterance of our lord is His further statement to the church at Philadelphia (Revelation 3: 10): “Because thou didst keep the word of My patience [patient endurance or perseverance], I also will keep thee from (ek) [i.e., ‘out of’ or ‘out from’] the hour of trial, that hour which is to come upon the whole inhabited earth, to try them that dwell upon the earth  Here also are declared:

 

 

a. The universality of that hour of trial,

so that any escape from it must involve removal;

 

b. the promise of being kept from it;

 

c. the intimation that such preservation is the consequence

of a certain moral condition: “Because thou didst keep... I also will keep

 

 

As this is addressed to a church, no question of a “Jewish” application can arise.  Nor do known facts or the Scriptures allow of the supposition that every Christian keeps the word of Christ’s patience (Matthew 24: 12; Revelation 2: 5; Galatians 6: 12; Colossians 4: 14 with 2 Timothy 4: 10 concerning Demas); so that this promise cannot be stretched to mean all believers.

 

 

In The Bible Treasury 1865, p. 380, there is an instructive note by J. N. Darby (see also Coll. Writings, vol. 13, Critical 1, 581) on the difference between (apo) and (ek).  The former regards hostile persons and being delivered from them; the latter refers to a state and being kept from getting into it.  On Revelation 3: 10 he wrote: “So Revelation 3 the faithful are kept from getting into this state, preserved from getting into it, or, as we say, kept out of it.  For the words here answer fully to the English ‘out of’ or ‘from’.”  That the thought is not being kept from being injured in soul by the trials is implied in the expression “Keep thee out of that hour”; it is from the period of time itself that the faithful are to be kept, not merely from its spiritual perils.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

180

 

FAITH TO THE SAVING OF THE SOUL*

 

 

BY PHILIP MAURO

 

[* From a chapter in the book: “God’s Pilgrims”.]

 

 

-------

 

 

 

We come to the important words which bring the tenth chapter of Hebrews to a close, and introduce the greatest theme of chapter 11: “Now my righteous one by faith shall live, but if he, my righteous one draw back MY SOUL shall have no pleasure in him.  But we are not of them that draw back unto destruction, but (of them that are) of FAITH TO SAVING THE SOUL”. (10: 38, 39).

 

 

The foregoing is a literal rendering of the original text; and we would at the outset call attention to several corrections that need to be made in the A.V.

 

 

1. The words “any man” are introduced by the translators as the subject of the verb “draw back”; but they are wholly without warrant in the original.  The antecedent subject is the “righteous one”, who is to live by faith.  The expression is the same that Paul used of himself in Gal. 2: 20, “the life I now live in the flesh, I live by faith which is in the Son of God”.  Jesus Christ is not only the Author, but also the Finisher of faith.  As already seen it is only the believer, the man who has been justified by faith, that can “draw back”.  The unbeliever has not come to anything from which he could “draw back”.  There is no question at all as to the correctness of the reading, “if he draw back”. R.V.  The drawing back to destruction is put in direct contrast with the living by faith, and going on to the saving of the soul.* It is true that the believer cannot draw back from his standing in Christ.  He cannot draw back from eternal life.  But he can draw back from the pilgrim’s place, and return to the world.

 

[* Here is the first indication that the words “salvation of souls” (1 Pet. 1: 9, R.V.), has nothing whatsoever to do with one’s initial and eternal salvation, but is a future salvation to occur after resurrection!  “    a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.” … “yet believing, ye rejoice greatly with joy unspeakable and full of glory: receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls” (Pet. 1: 5, 9. R.V.).  Compare with Acts 2: 27, 31, 34 with 2 Tim. 2: 18, R.V.]

 

 

2. The word “perdition” should be “destruction”.  The difference is important. 1 Cor. 3: 17 R.V. 1 Cor. 8. 11; Rom. 14: 15.  The people of God will surely suffer destruction if they draw back into the world.  Because it is polluted, it will destroy them with a sore destruction (Mic. 2: 10); that is, will involve them in great and irreparable damage or loss.  But they will never come into “perdition”.

 

 

3. The words “of them that believe”, should read “of faith”.  The original has not a verb “that believe”, but a noun “of faith” and that word “faith” is a most important one because it leads into the theme of chap. 11., which is given to the people of God for the very purpose of instructing them as to the character or nature of that “faith” that is effectual to saving the soul.  The next words are “Now faith”, (that is, the faith by which the soul is saved), “is the substance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen”.  Then follow examples of those who lived, to the end of their days, according to that faith which is the substance (that which stands under and thus supports) things hoped for, and the conviction as to the reality of things heard of, but not seen.

 

 

So far as the present writer is aware, the subject of the salvation of the soul has not been satisfactorily treated in any of the books of teaching now in the hands of the people of God. The manner in which this expression is commonly used indicates that “saving the soul” is regarded as meaning the saving of the individual man from condemnation, that is to say as equivalent to the justification of the sinner, and the impartation of eternal life upon believing the Gospel of God.  In other words, being “born again”, and “saving the soul”, are generally taken to be identical.  But according to the Scripture the two are very different.  In every case where the salvation of the soul is mentioned it is distinctly referred to as something future; and as something conditional upon the behaviour of the individual himself.  Eternal life is the gift of God, freely bestowed on every believer in Christ.  But the saving of the soul is distinctly set forth in many Scriptures, particularly in the words of the Lord Himself, not as a gift, but as a reward to be earned by diligence, steadfastness, and obedience to His commands. Matt. 10: 37-39; 16: 24-27; Mark 8: 34-36; Luke 9: 23-26: Luke 17: 32-33; John 12: 24-25.

 

 

The chief reason for the misconception that exists on this point is the failure to distinguish between soul and spirit, a distinction which is carefully made in the Scriptures, as we shall take pains to show.  The matter is of such surpassing importance, and so great consequences hinge upon it, that I strongly urge our readers to pay the closest attention to the sayings of the Lord Jesus, and to the other Scriptures cited in this chapter.

 

 

As an instance of the mention by our Lord of the saving and losing of the soul, we quote Matt. 26: 25-27, calling attention to the fact that the word rendered “life” in ver. 25, is the same word rendered “soul” in ver. 26: “If any one of you are willing, that is, has finally resolved, to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me.  For whosoever is willing to save his life (soul) shall lose it; and whosoever is willing to lose his life (soul) for My sake shall find it.  For what is a man profited if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his soul?  Or, what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?  For the Son of Man shall come in the glory of His Father, with His angels; and then He shall reward every man according to his works”.

 

 

We see clearly from this Scripture that the saving or losing of the soul is a matter of the will or choice of the man himself, and this is the teaching also of every Scripture that deals with this subject.  We see furthermore also that the time when those who choose to lose their souls now for Christ’s sake will gain their reward, that is, will find their souls again, is to be when the Son of Man shall come in the GLORY OF HIS FATHER, with HIS ANGELS. From this Scripture alone it is clear that by the salvation of the soul is not meant salvation from eternal condemnation.  The salvation of the sinner from the wages of sin is not dependent upon denial of self, taking up his cross and following the Lord Jesus; but is the gift of God’s grace, instantly and eternally granted the moment the sinner believes in the Crucified and Risen Saviour.  It is only a [regenerate] believer who can make the choice to deny himself, take up his cross, and steadfastly follow his Lord in the way He went.  To them who thus followed unto the end, a “reward” is promised.  That reward is the finding, [after ‘the first resurrection’] in the ‘age’ to come, of the “soul” they purposely lost in this age.   It concerns us, therefore, to ascertain, as may be done by diligent and prayerful inquiry, what the Lord meant by a man’s losing and saving his own soul.  That is the salvation of which the Lord “began” to speak, and which has been “confirmed to us by those who heard Him”, that is, by His apostles.  Whatever may be embraced in the meaning of the words “saving the soul”, it is at least clear that they do not refer to the justification of the sinner by God’s grace through faith in Christ, but to something in the nature of a reward set before those who have been already justified.  The “salvation of the soul” is not something received at the beginning of the Christian life on earth; but something to be gained at the end thereof. 1 Peter 1: 9.

 

 

That the “saving of the soul” is not the salvation of the sinner from eternal doom in the Lake of Fire, and that the losing of the soul is not the damnation of the sinner, is clear from the simple fact that the Lord promises a great reward to the man who loses his soul in this world.  Therefore, losing the soul and eternal damnation are totally different thing.

 

 

Another cause of the misconception referred to is (as it appears to us) the relatively little heed that is given in many quarters to the words spoken by the Lord Jesus Himself.  There is no room for dispute or doubt as to the value of the words of the Lord according to His own estimate thereof.  They are “spirit and life” (John 6: 63); 1 Tim. 6: 3.  They are the very words His Father commanded Him to speak, and are what will judge those who receive them not (John 12: 47-50).  His Sayings are HIMSELF (John 8: 25).  The giving of His Father’s words was the fulfilment of the purpose for which His Father sent Him into the world (John 17: 8, 14).  His disciples recognised Him as the One Who had “words of eternal life” (John 6: 68).  Keeping his words is the test of love for Himself, and has the promise of a great reward.  “If anyone loves Me, he will KEEP MY WORDS”.  “Because thou hast KEPT MY WORD”. “Because thou hast KEPT THE WORD OF MY PATIENCE”. (John 14: 23; Rev. 3: 8, 10).  Whereas, being ashamed of His word will be visited with disastrous consequences (Mark 8: 38).

 

 

Notwithstanding these weighty and unmistakably plain utterances from the lips of the Lord Jesus Himself, it must be admitted that, in the teaching of to-day, the words of the Lord, recorded for us in the Gospels, are assigned to a place of distinct inferiority.  In order to maintain certain dispensational views, it is necessary to relegate the ministry of Christ in the days of His Flesh to the “Jewish remnant”, and to treat His utterances as having but a remote or indirect reference and application to the members of His own Body, the Church.  One consequence of this teaching has been to foster a neglect of His words, and to render the hearts and consciences of many saints insensitive to the wholesome exhortations and warnings uttered by Him, which they are taught to regard as applicable only to an insignificant remnant of Israel.  A further consequence has been to blind the minds of the saints to the transcendently important matter of the salvation of their souls.  James 1. 21. On the other hand, the study of the doctrinal Epistles has been exalted to the position of the first importance, the very highest value being placed upon the ability to comprehend doctrinal points, and to state them with verbal precision according to accepted theological standards.  Failure on these points has been, and is, severely visited; while failure in the weightier matters of the law of Christ - particularly in the matter of love for all the saints - has been viewed with indifference.  Surely we should say “these things ought we to have done, and not have left the other undone”.

 

 

What, then, is the “soul” of a man, concerning the salvation of which the Lord Himself made a BEGINNING of speaking?  It is clear from the Scriptures that the “soul” is quite distinct from the [animating] “spirit”; and by attention to the teaching of the Word we may learn that the “soul” signifies the natural life of the man.  This embraces all his own exclusive personal experiences, sensations, and emotions; and these in turn arise from his relations and associations with the created things about him, especially from his relations with his fellow human beings.  It is distinctly the self-life, that is to say, the sum of every experience which pertains to the man himself, to his own separate personality, as distinguished from every other man.  It embraces all his own distinct and personal desires, ambitions, gratifications, honours, and pleasures.  It takes in all the plans  and arrangements he devises to secure his own satisfaction, entertainment, enjoyment, and so forth.  The instinctive longings of the soul are what impel men to pursue riches so ardently.  For it is by means of money that the desires of the soul may be gratified, so far as it is possible to procure gratification for them in this world.  Wealth commands distinction, attention, worldly pleasures, and high social position, and by means of it may be procured nearly everything that this world can supply for the satisfaction of the soul of man.  Hence, the Lord says, “Beware of covetousness” and His Apostle says, “Covetousness is idolatry”.

 

 

Important instruction on this point is given by the Lord in Luke 12., in the parable of the rich man.  He spoke this parable for the express purpose of enforcing the warning:- “Take heed, and beware of covetousness, for a man’s SOUL consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth” (ver. 15).  Then He tells of the rich man, whose ground brought forth plentifully, insomuch that he had not room enough to store his fruits. Therefore, the man laid his plans for his own advantage, that is for his SOUL.  He said, “I will pull down my barns and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and all my goods.  And I will say to MY SOUL, SOUL, thou hast much goods, laid up for many years; take THINE EASE, EAT, DRINK, and BE MERRY.  But GOD said unto him, ‘Thou, foolish one this night they* demand thy soul of thee, then’ - [when in ‘Hades’ - the underworld of the dead (Matt. 12: 40.) cf. Matt. 16: 16; Acts 2: 27; Rev. 6: 9, R.V.] - ‘whose shall those things be, which thou hast prepared’.” R.V.

 

[* That is, “the angels,” (Luke 16: 22, R.V.).]

 

 

This parable gives a clear idea of what the soul of man is; and it teaches plainly that the loss of the soul is the separation thereof from the things capable of affording satisfaction to it. 

 

 

In examining this important subject of the SALVATION OF THE SOUL, we would begin with the first reference to the soul in Hebrews, which is in chap. 4: 12.  We find there the important statement that the Word of God sharply divides between the soul and the spirit; a distinction, however, which teachers and commentators generally fail to observe. The Word of God speaks of the salvation of the spirit, John 3: 6-8, of the salvation of the soul, and of the salvation of the body; and there is a great difference between them.  In 1 Cor. 5: 5, Paul speaks of delivering one of the members of the assembly of Corinth unto Satan (who has the power of death), “for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit* may be saved in the Day of the Lord Jesus”.  Again, in many passages which we propose to notice, the Word speaks of saving the soul.  Phil. 3: 21, speaks of the Coming of the Lord as Saviour to change our bodies.

 

[* This salvation of “the spirit” is, I believe, a reference to Num. 14: 24, when those who apostatized at Kadesh-Barnea will later receive “another spirit” in ‘Hades’ contrary to the one they had before their Death!  See Heb. 12: 17. cf. Gal. 5: 5, R.V.]

 

 

The distinction between the spirit of man and the soul of man is recognized throughout Scripture.  Thus in 1 Thess. 5: 23, the Apostle prays for the sanctification of the whole man, and that “your whole spirit, and soul, and body be preserved blameless in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ”.

 

 

Of the Lord Jesus it is written that just before His death He commended His [animating (life-giving)] SPIRIT to His Father.  “And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice He said, Father, into Thy Hands I commend My spirit.  And having said thus He gave up the spirit [‘he breathed out’ (lit. Greek)]” (Luke 23: 46).  Of His SOUL and BODY it is written in Psa. 16., quoted in Acts 2: 31, “that His SOUL was not left in Hades, neither did His FLESH see corruption”.  It thus appears that His body went into the tomb, but saw no corruption there, while His soul went to Hades, or Paradise, the place of the departed.  With this also agrees the word He spoke to the believing malefactor, “Verily I say unto thee, to-day thou shall be with Me in Paradise” (Luke 23: 43).*

 

[* Here is the scriptural proof, of what takes place for every living soul, immediately after the time of Death: and the scriptural proof, (taught by our Lord Himself in Luke 16.), that His disembodied “soul” remained in “Hades,” for “three days and three nights” (Matt. 12: 40), before being reunited to His body at the time of His Resurrection.]

 

 

The word “soul” signifies, as we have said, the natural, or personal life of the individual man, in the broadest sense, including all the experiences, sensations, and emotions pertaining thereto.  In fact, the Greek word psuche is sometimes in our versions translated “life”, sometimes “soul”.  When the word “life” in our versions stands for psuche it never means eternal life, possessed by Christ, and imparted as the gift of God to those who believe on Him.  For that life the Greek word is zoe.  It is sometimes of much importance to know what the original word is.  Thus, in John 10, one of these words occurs in verse 10, the other in verse 11.  When Christ said “I am come that they might have LIFE”, He used the word zoe, eternal life.  When, however, He added “the good shepherd giveth his LIFE for the sheep”, He used the word psuche, soul or natural life; and the same word occurs in verses 15 and 17.  In verse 17 we read, “Therefore doth My Father love Me, because I lay down My life (soul) that I might take it again”.  The Lord Jesus has a true human soul, an individual, personal life, like each one of us, only without sin.  He laid it down; but He has taken it again.  Thus the Lord speaks of laying down His own sinless Soul, and in this we have further and conclusive proof that losing one’s soul does not mean damnation.  It means, as we have said, the cutting off of the soul from the things created for its satisfaction and enjoyment.  In verse 28, however, “and I give unto them eternal life”, the word is zoe. That life can never be lost; for they who receive it “shall never perish”.  Thus the life (soul) which Christ gave for us is not the same as the life He gives to us.  The difference is great.

 

 

Again, in John 12., both words occur in verse 25: “He that loveth his life (psuche) shall lose it; and he that hateth his life (psuche) in this world, shall keep IT (his soul, psuche) unto life (zoe) eternal”.

 

 

This is one of the instructive passages in which the Lord began to speak of the salvation of the soul.  The statement is brief, but comprehensive.  The man who loves his soul (psuche) shall lose it; and he that hates his soul IN THIS WORLD shall keep it unto life eternal. The Lord here declares clearly that the salvation of the soul is a thing future, and that it is dependent upon the faith, obedience, and stedfast endurance of the man himself.  In verse 27 He speaks of His own soul (psuche) saying, “Now is My SOUL troubled”.  In the Garden of Gethsemane He said to His disciples, “My SOUL is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death” (Matt. 26: 38).  In the passage quoted from Heb. 10., He says, “My SOUL shall have no pleasure in him”.  It is therefore in the soul that sorrow and pleasure are experienced.

 

 

From the above passage (John 12: 25) and from other Scriptures, it clearly appears, as we have already said, that the soul of man is that part of his being which is capable of experiencing sensations arising from relations with created things - “the world”.  The actual functions of seeing, hearing, tasting, etc are performed by the organs of the body; but the experiences and emotions resulting therefrom are of the soul.  The seeing of pictures, statues, buildings, processions, carnivals, ornate religious ceremonials, etc., etc.; the pleasures of music, literature, especially fiction, banquetting, dancing, sports, and the like; all amusements, entertainments, social functions, etc., form part of the life (or soul) of a man “in this world”.  It is by hating his soul, or self-life in this world, that a man may KEEP IT for the [millennial] age that is coming.

 

 

The passage last above quoted does not teach that the pleasures of the natural or personal life are necessarily evil; quite the contrary.  Neither does the passage teach that it is wrong for the people of God to experience gratification when some pleasing sight - as a beautiful landscape or gorgeous sunset - meets their eyes, though they should exercise care as to the liberty they allow themselves in this direction.  It is because these things are lawful and good in themselves, and are appointed for man’s enjoyment, that the Lord would have His disciples keep their souls unto eternal life [after “the First Resurrection” (Rev. 20: 5)], for then the pleasures of the created [and restored (Rom. 8: 19-21)] universe may be enjoyed to the full, without any taint of sin, and without any alloy of sorrow or pain.  To that end the disciple must hate his self-life (soul) in this world.  To love one’s life in this world is much the same as to love the world and the things that are in the world.  BUT CHRIST IS NOT IN THE WORLD. He laid down His Personal Life (psuche) in the world, and has now no part or pleasure in it. Nor could He have pleasure in the world as it is now.  His portion here was always sorrow. Therefore, it behoves the disciple of Christ to set his mind on things above where Christ is at the Right Hand of God (Col. 3: 1, 2).  And the consequence of not doing so is that he may indeed enjoy his soul here, but will lose it hereafter.  That judgment is just, and is so plainly declared in the Scripture that there is no excuse for ignorance in regard to it.  Thus it is that the Word of God divides between the soul and the spirit of man.

 

 

The above-cited passage in Colossians states that “YE DIED and your life (zoe) is hid with Christ in God.  But when Christ Who is our life (zoe) shall be manifested, then ye also shall be manifested with Him IN GLORY”.  Those who are to be manifested with Him “in glory” are those who died with Him.  It is needful on the believer’s part to reckon this to be true, and to act accordingly, taking the place of one crucified to the world, and therefore having no portion in it.  All that the believer has in the world is a path through it; the same path that the Master trod.

 

 

The view we have presented as to the soul of man is confirmed by the passage in Matthew 10: 37-39: “He that loveth father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.  And he that taketh not his cross and followeth after Me is not worthy of Me”.

 

 

It is quite common for a person to refer to some trial or burden he is compelled to bear, as his “cross”; but that is not at all what the Lord means by this saying.  A disciple’s “cross” is never something he must bear.  In order to fulfil this saying of the Lord’s the bearing must be voluntary.  The disciple must, as the act of his own will, take up the cross, and follow Christ; that is, follow Him unto crucifixion to the world; for the sole use made of the cross is to crucify thereupon the one who bears it.  The saying, therefore, is the strongest possible expression for the act of deliberately choosing to be with Christ in the place of death to the world, and to all the world has to offer those who seek their self-life there.

 

 

And the next words of the Lord are: “He that findeth his soul shall lose it, and he that loses his soul for My sake, shall find it”.  The literal rendering, which is preferable to the A.V. is: “He that hath found his soul shall lose it; and he that hath lost his soul, for My sake, shall find it”.

 

 

This saying needs no explanation.  It contains a clear promise that the man who has lost his soul for Christ’s sake shall find it; and as clear a warning that he who has found his soul shall lose it.  The words “has found”, “has lost”, point to the making of a settled and abiding choice.  One man has found his soul in this world as it now is, and has settled down to the spending of it.  He will learn in the end [of this life] that he has indeed spent it.  Another, for Christ’s sake, has parted with his soul, in this world.  He shall surely find it.  Instead of losing it, he is really keeping it for the coming [Millennial and Messianic] age.  These sayings of the Lord show that the losing of the soul in this world is the parting with all that ministers gratification to the soul.  It consists in taking such a position that the man is cut off from all the things the soul desires.  If such be indeed the meaning of losing the soul in this world, it will assist us to understand what is meant by the loss of the soul in the world to come.

 

 

Turning to Mark’s Gospel we find in chap. 8: 31-38, a passage in which the Lord “began to teach His disciples” certain things; and there we observe an important amplification of this doctrine of the Lord.  We read: “Whosoever WILL (that is, purposes or chooses to) come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow me” (ver. 34).  In this saying the action of the man’s own “will” is made conspicuous.  Also the words are added, “let him deny himself”, signifying the putting of self, and all personal inclinations aside, in order that he may be free to act according to the will of Another.  This denying of self is the giving up of all that constitutes the self-life or soul in this world.

 

 

In the next verse we find another addition.  In it the words “and the gospel’s” are added to the words “for My sake”.  The literal reading is, “on account of Me and of the good news”.

 

 

We take it that “the good news” in this connection is the good news of the “so-great salvation” that awaits the sons whom God shall bring “unto glory”.  The opening words of this gospel of Mark are “A beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, SON OF GOD”. The Epistle to the Hebrews calls special attention to the things spoken BY THE SON; and defines the “so-great salvation” as that of which “A BEGINNING” was “received to be spoken by the Lord”.  The correspondence is suggestive, at least, and may have more significance than appears at first glance.

 

 

Continuing to read in Mark, we come to the question: “For what shall it profit a man, [a disciple] if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul? or what shall [a disciple] give in exchange for his soul  In this passage the word “psuche” is correctly rendered “soul” instead of “life”, as in the preceding verses.  It is the same word in the original. Verses 35-37 read as follows, giving the word psuche the same rendering throughout: “For whosoever will save his soul shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his soul for My sake and the gospel’s, the same shall SAVE IT.  For what shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?  Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul

 

 

The Lord then adds this significant utterance: “Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of Me and OF MY WORDS in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him shall the Son of Man be ashamed, when He cometh in THE GLORY OF HIS FATHER with the holy angels”.  This points very clearly to the Coming of the son of Man with the angels of His power, as the time when the saving or losing of the soul, as to the next age, will take place.  It also admonishes us not to be ashamed of His words.  We should take heed therefore lest we slight the words of the Lord Jesus, which He spake concerning the age to come wherein He will reign over the earth.  We greatly fear the consequences of the tendency observable in certain quarters to treat the millennial kingdom of the Son as a thing of little interest to the saints of God.

 

 

A passage almost identical with the one last quoted is found in Matt. 16: 24-28, quoted in an earlier part of this volume.  We call attention again to the fact that this teaching was introduced by the Lord in connection with Peter’s confession of Him as the Christ, the SON OF THE LIVING GOD, and in connection with His own disclosure to His disciples of His approaching sufferings and death.  And the Lord stated that “then”, namely, at this moment when those who have lost their souls for His sake shall find them would be the time when He would “reward every man according to his works”.

 

 

Luke 9: 20-26 also contains a passage so closely resembling the above that no further comment thereon is required.  This fact however, should be noted, namely, that the teaching we are now considering is given six times in the four Gospels, which shows the great importance attached to it by the Spirit of God.  Yet this surpassingly important doctrine has practically no place at all in the teaching received by many of the Lord’s people at the present time.

 

 

“Come unto Me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest”. In the original, the words “give rest” are a verb, which may be rendered “will refresh” you.  This refreshing He gives to all who come to Him.  It is the washing of regeneration, the renewing of the Holy Ghost, the making of a new creature in Christ.  Then come the important words: “Take My Yoke upon you, and learn from Me, for I am meek and lowly of heart, and ye shall FIND REST unto your SOULS.  For My Yoke is easy, and My burden is light”.

 

 

There is, then, a [future] “rest” that is to be earned through submission to the yoke of Christ, and through learning from Him meekness and lowliness of heart; and this doubtless is the “rest” referred to in Heb. 3. and 4., that remaineth for the people of God.  None need fear to submit to His yoke, for it is “easy”, nor to His burden, for it is “light”. “His commandments are not burdensome” (1 John 5: 3).  But the point of chief importance for our present purposes is the doctrine that the [future and millennial] “rest” by which the disciple of Christ is to be rewarded for his obedience, is rest to his SOUL.  “Let us give diligence therefore to enter into that rest” (Heb. 4: 11).

 

 

In another passage of great interest and importance the Lord speaks to His disciples of saving their souls.  The passage is found in Luke 21.  The Lord is there foretelling the time of false christs, wars and commotions, earthquakes, famines and pestilences, and of persecutions, betrayal and death for His followers (verses 8-16).  For their comfort He says: “And ye shall be hated of all men for My Name’s sake; but there shall not an hair of your head perish” (17, 18).  Then He adds the exhortation, as rendered in the A.V., “In patience [perseverance] possess ye your SOULS”.  This rendering, however, does not at all give the sense of the original.  The word translated “possess” means to “gain”, as the reader can readily ascertain for himself by consulting any critical version or Greek concordance.  In “Bagster’s Englishman’s Greek New Testament” the verse is thus literally rendered; “By your patient endurance gain or win your souls”.  The only question among the competent authorities seems to be whether the form of the verb be imperative - “gain ye” - or future - “ye shall gain”.  For the purpose of our study it is immaterial what may be the tense of the verb.  In either view it signifies that the disciple of Christ may gain his own soul as a reward for the endurance of trials and persecutions.  This is the word of Christ’s patience (2 Thess. 3: 5., R.V.; Rev. 3: 10).

 

 

It is at the close of this passage that the Lord warns His disciples against allowing their hearts to be overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness, and cares of this life, (bios), lest “that Day” come upon them suddenly; and admonishes them to watch and pray always, that they may be accounted worthy to escape all these things, and to stand before the Son of Man.  It thus appears that watchfulness and prayer are needed in order to gain the promised reward (compare 1 Thess. 5: 6, 17).

 

 

The foregoing are the recorded instances in which the Lord made a beginning of speaking of the salvation of the soul.  Among “those that heard Him and that have confirmed the teaching to us, and amplified it, was the Apostle James.  This Apostle addresses believers as “my beloved brethren”, and admonishes them to be “swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath”, and he exhorts them to “receive in meekness the engrafted Word which is able to SAVE YOUR SOULS” (1: 19-22).

 

 

In this important passage the Apostle clearly distinguishes between the “gift” of the new birth and the reward of saving the soul.  He first speaks of the gift, saying, “Every good and perfect GIFT is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with Whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning” (ver. 17).  The next verse indicates of special gift from above, namely, the new birth, which is of the Will of God, and therefore not subject to be withdrawn, for in Him is no variableness.  Note the words, “Of His own Will begat He us with the Word of Truth, that we should be a kind of first fruits of His creatures” (comp. John 1: 12, 13).  Let it then be carefully noted that those who have been already begotten again with the Word of Truth (having believed on Christ, Who is the Truth), are exhorted to receive with submission the implanted Word, which is able to save their souls.  This clearly distinguishes the new birth from the saving of the soul.  It shows that a man may have been begotten again, and yet not save his soul.  The reason is that the new birth is a work done in a man’s spirit.  “That which is BORN of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3: 6).  If we assume that the exhortation of James 1: 21 is addressed to those who have been already born again, as we must do since they are addressed as “brethren”, it necessarily follows that the saving of the soul is something distinct from the new birth.

 

 

The new birth, then is a past event, for every [regenerate] believer in Christ, and can never be undone.  But the saving of the soul is a thing yet to be accomplished [at the time of Resurrection (Acts 2: 27, 34. cf. Luke 16: 22, 23, R.V.)]. Receiving the implanted Word is an exhortation having practically the same force as “giving earnest heed to things we have heard”, or letting “the Word of Christ abide” in us.

 

 

This much neglected Epistle of James, which by many is practically set aside as “Jewish” contains much valuable instruction and comfort for God’s pilgrims.  The very first words are strikingly appropriate:- “My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations (or trials.  Why?  Because “the trials of your faith worketh PATIENCE” [i.e., patience endurance or perseverance]; and this is the very thing declared by the Lord in Luke 21: 19, and by the Apostle in Heb. 10: 36 to be needed for attaining the promise, namely, the salvation of the soul.  The next words are very important: “But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be PERFECT [mature] and entire wanting (i.e. lacking) nothing”. The words of the Lord recorded in Luke 21: 19 show that the perfect work of patience or endurance is gaining the soul.

 

 

This Epistle belongs to a portion of the New Testament (including also Hebrews, and the Epistles of Peter, John and Jude) which closely corresponds to the Book of Numbers, the Book of the pilgrimage of God’s people in the wilderness.  This correspondence has been often pointed out, and much helpful instruction has been based thereon.  But the correspondence teaches more than is generally supposed.

 

 

The Epistles of Peter are also full of valuable instruction for those children of God who would be true “Hebrews”.  Here again the Word of God cuts sharply and cleanly between the new birth and the [future] salvation of the soul.  The message of Peter is addressed to those who have been already “begotten again unto a living hope by the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead [Lit. ‘out of dead ones’] (1 Pet. 1: 3).  These are now being “kept by the power of God THROUGH FAITH unto salvation ready to be revealed at the last time” (comp. 1 John 2: 18).  This future salvation is the salvation of the soul, spoken of in Heb. 10.; and the “faith” mentioned is the “faith to the saving of the soul”.  This is perfectly clear from verses 6-9.  Those born-again ones who are in “manifold temptations” are called upon (as in James) to rejoice, and for the reason that the outcome of the trial of faith, is to be rewarded by “praise, and honour, and glory, at the Appearing of Jesus Christ”.  Through believing on Him Whom they have “not seen”, they may rejoice with joy unspeakable and “glorified”, receiving (as they shall if they hold fast to the end the hope to which they have been begotten) ‘THE END of their faith’, namely, ‘THE SALVATION OF their SOULS’. Verse 9, R.V.  We would call special attention to the fact here stated that this salvation of the soul is the “end” of our faith, not the beginning.

 

 

Then we are informed that this salvation is that concerning which the prophets inquired and searched diligently, desiring to know what or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ Who was in them did signify, in testifying beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow.  Unto those prophets it was revealed that, not to themselves, but to us, they did minister the things which are now reported unto you (these being “the things which we have heard)” by those who preached the gospel unto you, with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven.  All this is manifestly in close correspondence with Heb. 2., where the “so great salvation” is mentioned.  And, to make the correspondence still closer, it is stated that this is a matter in which the angles are directly interested; for the Apostle Peter adds: “which things the angels desire to look into” (ver. 10-12).

 

 

The next verse shows that the message is for pilgrims: “Wherefore”, that is to say, in order to gain the end proposed (the salvation of the soul), “grid up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end, for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ”.  Grace provides this great salvation, and faith attains it, through hoping to the end.  “As OBEDIENT CHILDREN, not fashioning yourselves according to the former desires in your ignorance; but as He who hath CALLED YOU is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of behaviour.  And if ye call on Him as Father, Who, without respect of persons judgeth according to every man’s work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear” (13-17).

 

 

Here we have express mention of obedience, of the children who call upon God as Father, of the heavenly calling, of the judgment of believers’ works, of the sojourning, and of fear as to the consequences of disobedience.  These are the very topics to which prominence is given in Hebrews.

 

 

In chapter 2. we find the “holy priesthood”, who are to offer spiritual sacrifices (worshipping God in spirit) acceptable to God through Jesus Christ (ver. 5) and the “royal priesthood” who are to show forth the excellencies of Him Who called them out of darkness into His marvellous light.  This exercise of the functions of the “royal priesthood” belongs, we take it, to the [millennial] age to come, when the sons of the priestly house will show forth (which they certainly cannot do now) the excellencies of the Son, Who has called them into His marvellous light, which will then be displayed.

 

 

Again, at [1 Pet. 2:] verse 11 is a strong exhortation addressed expressly to God’s pilgrims: “Dearly beloved, I BESEECH you, AS STRANGERS and PILGRIMS, abstain from fleshy lusts (desires) which war AGAINST THE SOUL  Surely, the meaning of this is unmistakable.  The cravings of the flesh [sinful nature], whether coarse or refined, war against THE SOUL, and if indulged will, as the Lord declared, cause the loss of the soul in the age to come.  It is the [regenerate] “pilgrims” that are warned against enemies [i.e., evil spirits and doctrines of demons] which make war against the “soul

 

 

All the exhortations and encouragements of this Epistle are advantageous for God’s pilgrims; but we must leave our readers to study them in detail for themselves, asking them to observe that the practical object of all is that “when HIS (CHRIST’S) GLORY shall be revealed, ye may be glad also, with exceeding joy” (4: 13).  We call special attention also to the reference to Christ as the Shepherd and Overseer of OUR souls (2: 25); and to the exhortation to those who suffer according to the Will of God, that is, according to God’s appointment instead of for wrong-doings as in 4: 15, to commit the KEEPING OF THEIR SOULS ‘unto Him in well doing, as unto a faithful Creator.’ [See 1 Pet. 4: 19, R.V.].

 

 

Peter’s second Epistle is also full of pertinent instruction; but we would only call attention to the things which they who “have obtained like precious faith” are to add to their faith (i. 1: 5-8, in order that they be not barren or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ (chap. 1: 5-8).  Also to the words that follow: “Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure, for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall” (comp. Heb. 4: 11); “for so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the EVERLASTING KINGDOM OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST”* (10, 11).

 

[* NOTE: Scripture makes it perfectly clear (for those given eyes to see), that our Lord Jesus Christ has two kingdoms. Christ will sit on two separate thrones; and He has been promised two separate inheritances, (Rev. 3: 21; Psa. 2: 8; 110: 1-3, R.V.)! 

 

“The first resurrection” (Rev. 20: 5) will transfer the souls of the holy dead - (presently in “Hades” [see Acts 2: 27, 34; Luke 16: 23, 30-31, and compare with Matt. 16: 16; John 3: 13; 14: 3; 2 Tim. 2: 17b, 18; Rev. 6: 9-11, etc.]) - “accounted worthy” (Lk. 20: 35) to enter Messiah’s millennial reign upon and over this earth.  All others, not judged ‘worthy’ to partake of that resurrection, (when Christ returns [1 Cor. 15: 23; 1 Thess. 4: 16]), must remain in “Hades,” until the last resurrection and the commencement of the Great White Throne Judgment.

 

When “the thousand years” have expired, all the regenerate will enjoy the “free gift” and “eternal life” promised (Rom. 6: 23), - in the “EVERLASTING kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ”: but that eternal “Kingdom” - of both Father and Son - will be in “a new heaven and a new earth” (Rev. 21: 1, R.V.); after this present creation will be restored (Rom. 8: 19-21), destroyed, (2 Pet. 3: 10-13, R.V.) and ultimately replaced!]

 

 

This connects the passage directly with the Kingdom of the Son, which is the theme of Hebrews.  Therefore, the instructions given are of the utmost importance to those who would gain an entrance into that [messianic and millennial] Kingdom, and especially to those who seek, as every saint should seek, an abundant entrance thereinto.

 

 

Returning now to Hebrews, we would note that the hope there set before us, and which enters into that within the veil, is as “an anchor OF THE SOUL” (6: 19).  The occurrence of the word “soul” in this passage is very significant, but the significance thereof is rarely, if ever, noticed in the commentaries on Hebrews.  It is not said or implied, here or elsewhere, that a man may, by holding fast to a promise of God, save himself from perdition; but it is clearly implied in this Scripture that the heir of promise, by holding fast to the hope set before him, may save his soul for the [millennial] ‘age’ when joy will be complete and unalloyed.  The only security for the soul is that afforded by the Anchor within the veil.

 

 

We fervently pray and trust that the foregoing comments may be blessed of God, to the end that His saints may through study of the Scriptures cited, and by the teaching of the Holy Spirit, receive an understanding of that salvation so-great, ‘the salvation of souls’ [(1 Pet. 1: 9, lit Gk.)], whereof a beginning was spoken by the Lord, and which has been confirmed to us by them that heard Him.

 

 

In the light of the Scriptures we have examined, the meaning of the words “faith to the saving the soul” (Heb. 10: 30), is plain; and whereby also, the lesson of chap. 11. may be clearly perceived.  We refrain from commenting upon the details of that chapter.  It must suffice for our purpose to point out that the saints of former ages who are mentioned there had not only repentance and faith towards God for redemption from sin and death, but also had faith to the end of their days, waiting for something whereof they had heard from God and therefore “hoped for but had “not seen”.  They all became “strangers and pilgrims on earth” (ver. 13), and declared plainly that they sought a country.  They were free to return “to the country from whence they came out”; but they set their hearts on a better country, that is, an heavenly,* and for that reason, “God is not ashamed to be called their God” (14-16).  And such as these also are they of whom it is written that Christ “is not ashamed to call them brethren” (Heb. 2: 11).

 

[* NOTE: This is not  a reference to a “country” in Heaven, but a heavenly country.  That is, a country where Christ is bodily present; and his “glory” will then manifest for all on earth to see! Isa. 6: 3; 35: 2; 66: 18; Ezek. 39: 21; Hab. 2: 14. cf. Matt. 25: 31; Mk. 8: 38; Lk. 9: 26; Rom. 5: 2; 9: 23; Heb. 2: 10; 1 Pet. 1: 7, 11; 4: 13; Rev. 18: 1, etc.]

 

 

These “Hebrews” were tested in various ways.  No two were tried in exactly the same way.  On this point see especially verses 31-38.  But, whatever may have been the test appointed by God, it served to show that the man or woman was at heart a true Hebrew - that the HEART was right towards Him; and that is the essential thing.

 

 

-------

 

 

1. 1 Peter 1: 9 Obtaining the End: Perfection of Life - in moral consummation.

 

 

2. 1 Peter 1: 22 Obedience: Promotion of Life - in moral conformity.

 

 

3. 1 Peter 2: 11 Hindrance: Prohibitation of Life - in moral conflict.

 

 

4.  1 Peter 2: 25  Overseer: Provision of Life - in moral care and concern.

 

 

5.  1 Peter 3: 20  Salvation: Preservation of Life - in moral conscience.

 

 

6.  1 Peter 4: 19  By doing good: Presentation of Life - in moral conduct.

 

 

7.  2 Peter 2: 8 Tormented: Perils of Life - in moral calamity.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

181

 

THE THOUSAND YEARS REIGN

 

 

BY D. M. PANTON, B.A.

 

 

 

One extraordinary characteristic proves that the Kingdom of the Thousand Years belongs neither to our present Age, nor yet to Eternity, but is the hinge, the junction, between earth as it has existed for six thousand years and the vast Eternal Ages of which we know so little.  The characteristic is this:- the signal of its birth is the arrest and imprisonment of Satan; and its death-symptom is Satan’s release: these are the two events between which the Holy Spirit sets it.  That Satan is paralysed throughout it proves that the Millennium is not our Age of Grace; and that Satan is liberated after it for full activity proves that the Millennium is not the sinless Eternity beyond.  Thus Christ’s Kingdom on earth is the bridge between time and eternity, partaking of the nature of both.  It is God’s triumph on the old battlefield where He had seemed most defeated; and it is a last trial granted to the old earth before, on a fresh ruin, the present universe is swept out of existence for a new heaven and a new earth [Rev. 21: 1] wherein dwelleth righteousness.

 

 

THRONES

 

 

An immense change of dispensation bursts at once upon our gaze. “And I saw THRONES”; but not empty thrones; “and [men] sat on them” (Rev. 20: 4).  “The thrones as Lange says, “constitute the foreground of the picture: they are the beginning of the Church Triumphant in this world - the visible appearance of the Kingdom of God The Lord Jesus has already descended to earth (Rev. 19: 14) with a calvary escort who are specifically described, not merely as redeemed, but as “called and chosen and faithful” (17: 14); and their enthronement is now revealed.  It is a sharp reversal of the earlier drama.  In chapter 19 kings and captains and mighty men were dethroned, struck down in proud iniquity: in chapter 20 the meek and lowly are enthroned, exalted out of obscurity and reproach and shame.  It is the fulfilment of a forecast given three thousand years ago:- “The saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever” (Dan. 7: 18).*

 

* What disaster has been wrought by the Augsburg Confession’s (Art. 17) denial of the literal Reign! On this point Protestantism definite aligned itself with the Church of Rome, for it was that Church’s assumption of the Throne of the Caesars which, as the logical outcome of a present kingdom, dislodged Christ’s reign for the Pope’s.  Nevertheless, even Hengstenberg, a most determined opponent of the doctrine, admits that by the middle of the nineteenth century, “Chiliasm obtained an almost universal diffusion throughout the Church

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

 

Still move explicit and decisive is the function allotted them, making the new royalties no mere spectators in a royal pageant, but monarchs in full responsibility and power.  “And JUDGMENT” - full authorization to act as judges in a final court of appeal - “was given unto them  This stamps as false all attempts to find fulfilment for the Millennium now; for both the throne and the judiciary are forbidden to the disciples of Christ throughout our age of grace: whereas the moment the monarchs and judges of earth are dispossessed by the descending Christ, necessity compels reappointments, and the establishment of officers qualified to act. “Know ye not Paul asks, “that the saints shall JUDGE the world (1 Cor. 6: 2). This granted judgment is the characteristic word of the Age to Come.  For all judgment falls in the Millennial epoch; its triple tribunal - the Bema, the Throne of the Living Nations, and the Great White Throne - exhausts all judgment; and judgment, or justice, reigns from end to end of the Kingdom on earth.  Our Lord revealed this explicitly to the Thyatiran Church:- “He that overcometh and he that keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give authority over the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron, as the vessels of the potter are broken to shivers; as I also have received of my Father” (Rev. 2: 26).

 

 

REWARD

 

 

The Spirit next strikes the fundamental chord of millennial music.  The whole body of martyrs suddenly rises before us:- “and I saw the souls of them that had been BEHEADED that is, the martyrs of all ages.  Why is it that a single class of God’s servants so fills the foreground that many in the Early Church thought that they alone would reign with Christ?  That it is martyrs who are thus selected provides the clue; for the Age to Come is specifically defined as “the time to give their reward to thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and to them that fear thy name, the small and the great” (Rev. 11: 18).  As human law knows no crime greater than murder, so Divine law knows no higher fidelity than loss of life for God; and as the Kingdom is granted on the principle of recompense, since “if we suffer with him, we shall also reign with him” (2 Tim. 2: 12), the central blaze, the supreme recompense, centres in the martyrs. “As men upon whom the ban of the world pre-eminently fell, they must be pre-eminently honoured in the Kingdom of God” (Lange).  So the strong note thus struck, that stamps its character on the whole Millennium, is not grace, in which all believers are equal, but recompense, which distinguishes the faithful from the unfaithful, the worthy from the unworthy, carnality from sanctity.  For the Kingdom is peculiarly Christ’s Kingdom, which He achieves by overcoming and not by gift, and which He ultimately gives back to the Father; and so He offers it on like conditions to the Laodicean Angel, as the most powerful conceivable antidote to lukewarmness. “He that overcometh, I will give to him to sit down with me in my throne, as I also overcame, and sat down with my Father in His throne” (Rev. 3: 21).

 

 

A THOUSAND YEARS

 

 

So now the Kingdom opens on our vision.  “And they lived” - came to life, rose from the dead; attained to life before my eyes (Hengstenberg) - “and reigned with Christ” - whose is the central throne - “A THOUSAND YEARS  John either saw the souls rise, or else saw that they rose; but “the rest of the dead lived not” - they remained dead - “until the thousand years should be finished  An ineradicable defect in all attempts to erect the Kingdom without the King, a devastating fact which forever wrecks all man-made millenniums, is that it perforce excludes all the dead, including those who most deserve it - the martyrs: only the Master of resurrection can be the Creator of the Kingdom, and even He can do it only by raising the dead.  So therefore what ‘the Kingdom of God’ is, - in all literal passages, the Spirit has put beyond all doubt:- “Flesh and blood [the unchanged living] cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption [the unrisen [bodies of the] dead] inherit incorruption” (1 Cor. 15: 50).* The Kingdom’s exact limit, a thousand years, is named six times, so as to put its literality and duration beyond all question for ever.** It is not said where John saw the thrones located: probably in the Holy City, hovering over the earth (Rev. 19: 7, 8): even as King George, though Emperor of India, and occasionally holding a Durbar in Delhi, resides, habitually, in London, the Empire’s central city, so earth’s new Monarchs, visiting earth, nevertheless actually dwell in their Metropolis.

 

[* Keep in mind this divine truth:- “Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God,” but “flesh and bones” can; and will after the time of ‘the salvation of souls’ (1 Pet. 1: 9, R.V.) at their Resurrection.  “See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones as you see that I have (Luke 24: 39, R.S.V.). - Ed.]

 

** Thus it is the ‘Sabbath-rest’ - the seventh of seven millenniums since the Creation.  And it is covered by an unchanging exhortation:- “Let us therefore labour to enter into that rest, lest any [of ‘us’: see ver. 1] fall after the same example of disobedience” (Heb. 4: 11).

 

 

THE FIRST RESURRECTION

 

 

So now the glory of it all is counter-signed by God Himself.  “This is the first resurrection.  Blessed and holy is he” - for it is all sharpened down to a personal recompense - “that hath part in THE FIRST RESURRECTION* Here is the culmination of all the golden promises that centre in an earlier breaking of the tombs.  The last great orthodox German said:- “Paul spoke of a resurrection to which he strove to attain (Phil. 3: 8, 11), and to which he was with all his might pressing forward, as the high prize to gain which he was agonizing, and for which he counted all else loss” (Lange).  So our Saviour indicates the peculiar capacities of these Priestly Kings. “They that are accounted worthy of that age, and the resurrection from among the dead, are as the angels” (Luke 20: 36): as angels appear among men, on behalf of God, or disappear, or as the risen in Jerusalem “entered into the holy city and appeared unto many” (Matt. 27: 53), so do these.  The moment God has answered the prayer - “Thy kingdom come He entrusts to his regnant saints, selected through a lifetime of tested service, the fulfilment of the sequent clause - “Thy will he done on earth even as it is done in heaven”; and He endows the overcomer - blessed because a king, holy because a priest - with unchallengeable authority, and adequate ability to perform it.

 

* “‘Blessed and holy’ must be emphatic here, for they can hardly bear the simple and ordinary meaning. All saints of every age are blessed and holy in reality and to a certain extent, let them live or die where or when they may.  The phrase in our text, therefore, must be employed in an emphatic sense, in a sense which drew the writer’s special attention, and which he intended should also he specially noted by the reader” (Moses Stuart).

 

 

A FINAL MILLENNIUM

 

 

Once again, and for the last time, the crowning reward of all the servants of God of all ages is emphasized ere it vanishes. “Over these the second death hath no power.* but they shall be PRIESTS OF GOD AND OF CHRIST, and shall reign with him a thousand years Godward they represent man, and manward they represent God: they rule for God, they intercede for man.  It is the intermediate Age between time and eternity. The Curse is controlled, but not lifted; death is rare, but not unknown; war is banished, yet whole nations are broken or even consumed;** the Devil is in chains, but not in the Lake; and though the Kingdom starts sinless, fresh births create a last awful rebellion.  So, therefore, when, in spite of a last opportunity, both Satan and the new-born nations in the flesh hurl themselves against God, annihilating fire falls, and seven thousand years of human history disappear in an Eternity (for all the saved), sinless, painless, deathless, tearless.  As Canon Gairdner once wrote:- “Even the grand completion, conclusion, FINIS, foreshadowed in the Book of the Apocalypse, prophesied of by the prophets, longed and hoped for by the saints, the crashing finale of the great oratorio of the Kingdom, an end if ever there was one - is not even this to be but Eternity’s beginning, when the finished enterprise is dedicated to its Maker and Redeemer, for an eternity of unimaginable use, unimaginable service.”

 

* This needs to be stated, because the Millennial epoch is the period of the exact recoil of a believer’s works, the worst as well as the best: in the Eternal State it is nowhere named, for it is impossible; since our eternal standing is on Grace alone, and any peril from the Lake is over for ever. The implication here is terrible, but it is always wise to bow at once to the words of God.

 

** It is hardly necessary to say that the subjects ruled over are, at the start the Sheep of the Parable - regenerate (Matt. 25: 34) men in the flesh who, unhampered by disease or death (Isa. 33: 24), will restock the earth after the judgments with enormous rapidity.  But all fresh births are unregenerate (Isa. 65: 20), and on these Satan ultimately works.  There can be no uncrowned saints in the Millennium, for all who ‘lived,’ ‘reigned’: coronation is an essential of kingship.

 

 

-------

 

 

FAITHFUL UNTO DEATH

 

 

Their names are names of kings

Of heavenly line;

The bliss of earthly things

They did resign.

 

 

Chieftains they were, who warr’d

With sword and shield:

Victors for God the Lord

On foughten field.

 

 

A city of great name

Is built for them,

Of glorious golden fame,

Jerusalem!

 

 

So doth the life of pain

In glory close:

Lord God, may we attain

Their grand repose.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

182

 

JACOB AND ESAU

 

 

 

The Epistle to the Hebrews gives the names of a number of persons who were true pilgrims, holding fast their confession to the end.  In contrast with these, but one person is named.  That unenviable prominence is given to Esau.  His case, therefore, calls for special consideration.  What is related of Esau in Hebrews is that he so lightly esteemed his birthright as to sell it for one morsel of food; and that afterwards, when he would have “inherited THE BLESSING, he was REJECTED: for he found no place for repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears” (12: 16, 17).

 

 

Esau, therefore, is the Divinely chosen type of those who prefer the immediate gratification of the natural appetite to “the blessing” for which the heir must “wait  Hence, he became like the ground that receives no “blessing” from God; but is “rejected

 

 

On the other hand, we read in Gen. 27. that Isaac, in blessing Jacob, supposing him to be Esau, said, “See, the smell of my son is as the smell of a field which the Lord hath BLESSED: therefore, God give thee of the DEW OF HEAVEN, and the fatness of the earth, and plenty of corn and wine” (ver. 27, 28).

 

 

Believers are children of God, being “born of God” (John 1: 12).  They have therefore a birthright, as Esau had; but like Esau, they may hold their birthright in such light esteem as to forfeit it; and the way in which this great loss may be incurred - a loss which, when it takes place, is absolutely irretrievable - is by choosing in their hearts the things which the present age offers them for their immediate enjoyment, instead of the things of the age to come, of which they have heard through the Word of God, but have not seen as yet, and for which they must wait.

 

 

Upon reading the incidents recorded in the Book of Genesis concerning Esau and Jacob, we should infer that, in respect of natural disposition or character, Esau was much to be preferred to his brother Jacob.  But Jacob was the true sojourner and pilgrim.  We see him journeying alone in the land promised to his fathers and to himself for an inheritance, and lying down to sleep with a stone for a pillow (Gen. 28: 10-15).  And there he sees the vision of a ladder set up on the earth, its top reaching to heaven, and the angels of God ascending and descending.  Thus is he marked as the heir of salvation, to whom the angels are sent forth to minister; and the Lord God of Abraham and of Isaac appears to him, and gives to him the land on which he lies, a lonely pilgrim. Moreover, God adds this gracious word: “And behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee in all places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land; for I will not leave thee until I HAVE DONE that which I have spoken to thee of

 

 

Jacob’s infirmities of character did not defeat the purpose of God; for the “God of Jacob” is the “God of all grace  So may the God of peace work in us that which is well pleasing in His sight through Jesus Christ, to Whom be glory for ever.

 

 

We may follow Jacob in his pilgrimage and see the Hand of God dealing with him, often by means of sore affliction, but surely accomplishing thereby that which He had purposed.  And so when Jacob, many years after, stands before Pharaoh, the ruler of the world, it is as a confessed pilgrim and the descendant of pilgrims; for this is his confession, “The days of the years of my PILGRIMAGE, are an hundred and thirty years: few and evil have the days of the years of my life been, and have not attained unto the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of their pilgrimage” (Gen. 47: 9).  Nevertheless, Jacob, though a confessed pilgrim on earth, took no blessing from Pharaoh. On the contrary, “Jacob blessed Pharaoh, and went out from before Pharaoh” (ver. 10); “And without all contradiction, the less is blessed of the better” (Heb. 7: 7).

 

 

And finally, it is recorded of Jacob, that he, “by faith, when he was a dying, blessed both the sons of Joseph, and worshipped, leaning upon the top of his staff” (Heb. 11: 21). Thus Jacob was, at the very end, a worshipping pilgrim, for, even, when he was dying, he still leaned upon the pilgrim’s staff, worshipping God, and speaking of things not seen as yet.

 

 

The forty-ninth chapter of Genesis contains the last words of Jacob to his twelve sons.  In one of the most beautiful, powerful, and sublime passages in all the Bible, he tells that which shall befall them in the last days. In it he speaks of the Shepherd and the Stone of Israel, of Shiloh, of the Sceptre, and of the Lion of the tribe of Judah.  In the very midst of this great prophecy he confesses himself a true pilgrim in these words: “I have WAITED FOR THY SALVATION, O Lord  That was what he had accomplished, “I have waited It is like the confession of Paul, “I have kept the faith  God’s grace had triumphed over the stubbornness of nature, and had fashioned even out of crafty Jacob, the supplanter, a true pilgrim; insomuch that from his lips, we get the first mention in all Scripture of the [future] Salvation of God.

 

 

Surely, there is great encouragement here for the Lord’s pilgrims.

 

 

-------

 

 

EXPECTATIONS

 

 

“Only the man who hourly awaits his Lord lives in the constant searchlight of God.  Shortly before the War, a high-born German lady, Sister Eva, who had founded a hospital with her own money, told the Kaiser, to his marked interest, of the preaching of Christ to the patients, and of the Keswick and Wandsbek Conventions; but when she spoke of the Lord’s return, the Kaiser abruptly interjected:- ‘That will never do; it would upset all my plans  Each life is shaped by its dominant expectation.  ‘I do not think,’ said the late Lord Shaftesbury, ‘that in the last forty years I have lived one conscious hour that was not influenced by the though of the Lord’s return.’”

 

 

PRAYER THAT COUNTS

 

 

“If we are simply to pray to the extent of a simple and pleasant and enjoyable exercise, and know nothing of watching in prayer and of weariness in prayer, we shall not draw down the blessing that we may.  We shall not sustain our missionaries, who are overwhelmed with the appalling darkness of heathenism.  We must serve God even to the point of suffering, and each one ask himself: In what degree, in what point am I extending, by personal suffering, by personal self-denial, to the point of pain, the kingdom of Christ, [and the possible loss, through disobedience, of God’s promised inheritance (Psa. 2: 8. cf. Eph. 5: 5; Gal. 5: 19-20; Heb. 12: 17, R.V.])?  It is ever true that what costs little is worth little.” - HUDSON TAYLOR.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

183

 

CHRISTADELPHIANISM

 

 

BY D. M. PANTON

 

 

 

“Information reaches us that the Christadelphians are issuing a magazine under the title of “The Dawn.” We hope that they are doing so because they are unaware of the existence of our magazine; but in any case it is well to put perfectly clear our attitude to their creed.  We are grateful to The Life Of Faith (Nov. 14, 1945) for also making the distinction between the two magazines perfectly clear. - ED., [D. M. Panton of] DAWN.”

 

 

-------

 

 

 

IT is exceedingly striking that an elaborate system has arisen around us camouflaging the Second Advent in all its main details, each Satanic sect presenting a counterfeit feature of the Advent, while all, combined, present a complete camouflage.  Thus Christadelphianism pushes into the foreground watchfulness for the Coming of our Lord.  It says:- “Jesus Christ, Who is the glorified manifestation of God, the fulness of the Godhead bodily incorporated, and Who came bodily forth alive from the grave” (Bible Finger posts, pp. 7, 105), “a glorious bodily Person of Spirit, flesh and bones” (Is it Blasphemy? p. 17). “will return from Heaven, and visibly appear and take up His residence on earth a second time, for the purpose of bringing about the accomplishment of all these things.  The second coming of Christ is therefore the true hope of the believer” (Declaration of the Truth, p. 15).* “We believe that at the return of Jesus Christ from Heaven, to establish His Kingdom on earth, He will, first of all, summon before Him for judgment the whole of those who are responsible to His judgment.  Those that are dead He will cause to come forth from the dust, and assemble them with the living to His presence” (Ibid, p. 49). “Those who are to be honoured with this unspeakable honour of reigning with Christ are first to be qualified for it by the transformation of their bodies into the likeness of the Lord’s own glorious body” (R. Roberts’ Sect Everywhere Spoken Against, p. 11). So here we have a perfectly orthodox statement exactly calculated to captivate a young mind steeped in Second Advent truth, and unversed in Satan’s wiles.

 

 

* These references are taken throughout from publications officially issued at Christadelphian Headquarters.

 

 

Now let us pierce past this fair husk and discover the kernel remembering that superb structure is not only vain, but of all structures the most dangerous because of its beauty, if it rests on a rotten foundation.  We are now startled to learn that the Gospel to which we are accustomed is an entire delusion.  “The idea that Christ has borne our punishment and paid our debts, and that His righteousness is placed to our credit, and that all we have to do is to believe it, is demoralising.  Blighting results are to be witnessed in all communities where the doctrine of a substitutionary sacrifice and an imputed righteousness holds sway” (R. Roberts’ Blood of Christ, p. 29).  “Christ has given no satisfaction, paid no debt” (R. Roberts’ Slain Lamb, p. 21): “If the blood of Christ could be found, it would not be of any spiritual value” (Blood of Christ, p. 7).  In what, then, does salvation consist?  Solely in belief in the coming Millennial Kingdom and in Baptism.  “The belief of the Gospel described by the Spirit of God as ‘the things concerning the Kingdom of God and the Name of Jesus Christ,’ together with baptism (immersion in water), and the obedience of the commandments of Christ, are indispensable to the obtaining of eternal life” (Bible Fingerposts, p. 243). Moreover, it must be Christadelphian baptism; for none other is valid.  “We recognise as brethren, and welcome to our fellowship, all who have been immersed (by whomsoever) after their acceptance of our doctrines and precepts”; and among “doctrines to be rejected” is this: “That a knowledge of the (Christadelphian) truth is not necessary to make baptism valid” (Constitution of the Christadelphian Ecclesia, pp. 1, 13).  The consequences are most drastic. “WE AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO SALVATION WITHIN THE PALE OF ANY OF THE POPULAR CHURCHES.  For we hold that the religious opinions and sacramentalism of all orders and classes of men in ‘Christendom’ so-called are nothing more than that ‘strong delusion’ sent of God upon mankind ‘that they should believe a lie, that they might all be condemnedWe object to the fundamental doctrines of Christendom; the religion of the Churches and chapels is a negation of Bible teaching on almost all points.  We hold it to be ‘the abominations of the earth,’ with all the dissenting names and denominations, aggregately styled ‘names of blasphemy,’ of which the European body politic, symbolised by the eight-headed, scarlet-coloured beast, is said to be ‘full’” (Rev. 17 : 3) (Who are the Chrisladelphians? pp. 3, 6, 8).

 

 

But the supreme test, critically and for ever decisive, turns upon the nature and person of the Son of God. “Jesus,” we are told, “had no existence prior to his birth by Mary”: “Jesus is the name of the virgin’s Son, and not that of an externally pre-existent God Who came down from Heaven, and in some mysterious way became incarnate in the flesh” (Is it Blasphemy ? p. 19). “The Father was manifested in the flesh, not a pre-existent, co-eternal Son, which is impossible” (C. C. Walker’s Truth about the Trinity, p. 13). But it is worse than that: Jesus was a sinful Christ.  Among the ‘doctrines to be rejected’ is this: “That Christ’s nature was immaculate” (Constitution of the Christadelphian Ecclesia, p. 13). “What the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God (has done) sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin condemned sin in the flesh.  It was the same flesh, full of the same propensities, and the same desires, in Christ as in us” (R. Roberts’ Slain Lamb, p. 21) for “sinful flesh and the likeness of sinful flesh mean the same thing” (R. Roberts’ Blood of Christ, p. 26). “Deriving from his mother both the propensities that lead to sin and the sentence of death that was passed because of sin, He was absolutely sinless as to disobedience, whilst subject to the impulses and the consequences of sin.  For it was necessary that He should appear in the nature of Abraham and David, which was sinful nature  So it is baldy stated that our Lord had to die for His own sins as well as ours. “Christ Himself is exhibited to us as coming under the beneficial operation of His own death” (R. Roberts’ Blood of Christ, pp. 10, 25).  Therefore, inevitably, “Christadelphians do not worship the Lord Jesus Christ in the same way that they worship the Father” (Is it Blasphemy? p. 19).

 

 

Now it all sharpens down into a point that pierces us all.  Even apart from the bankruptcy of a sinful Christ, John the Baptist bore the clearest possible testimony to our Lord’s pre-existence.  Of Jesus he says:- “He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is of the earth, and of the earth he speaketh: He that cometh from heaven is above all” (John 3: 31).  Our Lord Himself bore the same explicit testimony.  He says:- “No man hath ascended up into heaven, but He that descended out of heaven, even the Son of Man, which is in heaven” (John 3: 13).  The Jews stumbled nineteen hundred years ago exactly where the Christadelphians stumble to-day. “And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?  How doth he now say, I am come down out of Heaven (John 6: 42).  Awful and eternal is the answer of the Lord.  “And He said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above ye are of this world: I am not of this world.  I said therefore unto you” - in consequence of this denial of His pre-existence - “that ye shall die in your sins: for except ye believe that I am He, YE SHALL DIE IN YOUR SINS” (John 8: 24). The pre-existence of the Eternal Son of God is a matter of life and death: no one who denies our Lord’s Deity can be forgiven; for it is the Father’s decree that “all should honour the Son EVEN AS THEY HONOUR THE FATHER” (John 5: 23).

 

 

-------

 

 

Salvation

 

 

Now we see the extraordinary simplicity with which our Lord thus invests salvation.  It is not, “If any will do God’s will” - a vast obedience before saving knowledge can ever come; but, “If any man wills to do” - simply longs to know the truth in order to live it - “he shall know” - in a flash, as he sits - “whether it be of God”: he will see God, instantly, in the Gospel.  The simplest, the youngest, the most ignorant, the most wicked, willing, will know.  Just WILL; and saving truth floods the soul.  It is true of all truths, and of all stages of truth - therefore it is for us Christians too.  The cured blind man exactly expresses it.  Jesus said to him, “Dost thou believe on the Son of God?  He answered and said, Who is he, Lord, that I may believe on him? Jesus said unto him, He it is that speaketh with thee.  And he said, Lord, I believe” (John 9: 35).  He had but to know God’s incarnate will to accept it instantly.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *      *

 

 

184

 

AN EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE

TO THE HEBREWS

 

 

BY ROBERT GOVETT, M.A.

 

 

Summary

 

 

II. THE SECOND POLE (CHAP. 4: 12-16)

 

 

 

1. The Apostle’s rebuke turns on Christians’ unbelief of the typical character of the Old Testament, and especially of the history of Abraham the father of the faithful.

 

 

2. Great, in the way of light and gift, are the privileges of this dispensation. Answerably great are the responsibilities attaching thereto.  Now, from these privileges there may be a partial, or an entire, turning away.  For a partial turning away there is loss of the reward of the millennial kingdom.  For a total falling away there is no hope; but only the eternal [Gk. ‘aionios’ age-lasting] curse and wrath of God.

 

 

3. The chief promises to Abraham have never yet been fulfilled, although they are yet in force, resting on the oath of God.  They were made before the Law of Moses, and were not set aside by it.  Seek then to have a part in these, as Abraham did, by patience and faith.

 

 

III. THE THIRD POLE (CHAP. 10: 19-39)

 

 

As the first pole respects Christ as our (1) “Apostle” (or Leader), this belongs to His present maintenance of our standing as our (2) “High Priest” (3: 1).  Our title is, to be in God’s presence in the Holiest, by virtue of this being the Day of Grace, and the throne whereto we draw near being the Throne of Grace. We are worshippers, cleansed by the blood of the True Sacrifice, and our High Priest beckons us to draw near.  The veil is rent!  As the unrent veil betokened (1) concealment on God’s part, and (2) distance on man’s, so the rent veil discovers to us, (1) a God revealed, and (2) fellowship extended to us.

 

 

“Let us then draw near Seven points in relation to this are noted.  The first three give us God’s preparations for this blessing: the last four, the preparations on our side.  The preparations made by God are: (1) the blood of Christ; (2) the rent veil; (3) the High Priest in the Holiest.

 

 

The preparations on our part are: (4) a true heart; (5) full faith; (6) a heart sprinkled; (7) the body bathed.

 

 

Three exhortations are given in this context: (1) “Let us draw near (2) “Let us hold fast (3) “Let us consider one another

 

 

But many [regenerate] believers are offending against all these points.  They are wanting in a true heart, in fulness of faith, in a good conscience, and in baptism.  Some deny the hope, and some do not confess it.  Some provoke their brethren to bitterness; some forsake the assemblies of the Lord’s people, and do not exhort one another.

 

 

The reason given to enforce these commands is, that the day of judgment, to take effect on all, is at hand. While the meeting with Christ will be joyful to His obedient ones, it will be terrible to His foes.  Instead of - ‘Fear not all ye who believe it is - ‘Beware of the falling away from the grace of Christ and the Holy Ghost  For that would set you among the foes of God; producing (1) trouble of heart and terror of suspense now; and (2) the fall into the fury of fire prepared for the enemies of Christ, in the coming day.

 

 

1. Thus we have present access to God, and acceptance as priests in the Holiest above, through the work of Christ.

 

 

2. But this is only for a while.  There is another day to come.  We hope for Christ’s coming and kingdom. Hold fast the hope, and confess it.  For those who fall away from faith and hope become foes of Christ, and lost in the deepest woe.  Those alone who maintain faith and hope, will receive from Christ the promised rewards.

 

 

IV. THE FOURTH POLE (CHAP. 12)

 

 

This is its tenor.

 

 

1. Believers!  Yu are like Israel, on your march to the land of promise.  n the way to it, you like Israel, are being chastised by your God.

 

 

2. But the design of your life, and of God’ chastisement, is to produce holiness as the preparation for seeing, and dwelling with Him.  He is educating you for it; not under the principle of fear, as in the case of His ancient people; but under grace, as the better one.  You, then, resemble Israel set before the Mount of God, under command to sanctify yourselves.  And the Holy Spirit thereupon testifies the things that are agreeable to this holiness, and the things which are contrary thereto.

 

 

We are already (to faith’s eye) in the presence of the better and eternal things; and may in a moment be called up the mount, and set in the presence of God and Christ.

 

 

Understand, then, that holiness is proportionate to obedience - and that reward is proportionate to both.  By disobedience and unholiness we may lose the pre-eminent place now accorded to us as the firstborn, even while we retain the standing of grace.  But if grace be rejected, and justice chosen, there is no escaping the terrors of God, as the consuming fire.  And God, in the day to come, is the judge of the obedience of His people, and of the offences of His foes, and will render to each as his work shall be.

 

 

Let me give, in conclusion, a brief summary of the proofs derivable from this Epistle, that a dispensation of reward and glory on earth is implied in several of its arguments and statements.

 

 

1. Promises made to the Lord Jesus have not yet been fulfilled.  He is the second time to be introduced to the habitable earth, when angels are to worship Him, and His foes to be put under His feet.  At present, during the day of mercy, He is waiting, on the Father’s right hand, till the kingdom of righteousness is given to Him as the reward of His merits, while He is to have with Him companions in the kingdom and glory (1).

 

 

The eighth psalm has been in part fulfilled in the Saviour’s humiliation. But the exaltation of man, and of the Son of man, over all the works of God’s hands, can only take place by the Saviour’s coming again in person; and the glory can be only during the habitable earth’s future state (2).

 

 

2. Jesus, as Leader of the heavenly calling, is inviting us to enjoy with Him the redemption-rest of God.  As yet, it is only the unsettledness and trials of the wilderness.  It is also the time of God’s trial of His people, whether they will obey Christ or no, and hold fast the hope of their calling.  This redemption-rest is to resemble the rest of God in creation, and the rest which Israel, under Joshua, experienced in the land, after the troubles of the desert were over (3, 4).

 

 

3. The miraculous gifts of the Holy Ghost then enjoyed were witnesses to the coming better day on earth, when Israel shall ‘all be anointed by the Holy Spirit.’ The tidings of the kingdom of glory were proclaimed in company with these gifts, in order to bestow on us some proofs of the reality of the hope set before us, and to give us some intimation of its character.  Thus the ejection of demons testified to the casting of Satan and his angels into the pit (Rev. 20), while the power over serpents given to disciples, gave intimation of the day when the creatures of venom and blood now found on earth shall be tamed, or changed (6).

 

 

4. To Abraham God promised the land of Canaan, from the Nile to the Euphrates (Gen. 15).  This he has never enjoyed.  This he cannot enjoy, while he is a separate spirit [disembodied soul] in Hadees. Thus the first resurrection is implied.  It takes place a thousand years before earth is burnt up.  This is our hope also; who, as man-slayers, safe in the city of refuge, are yet looking onward to their restoration (6).  A type of that day of victory and blessing, for Abraham and his sons of faith, was given in the meeting of the patriarch with the Great Priest-king, and in the promises of the one hundred and tenth psalm.

 

 

5. The Promises of the new covenant made to the House of Israel imply this happier day of earth. Neither the spiritual, nor the earthly promises, given in the thirtieth and thirty-first chapters of Jeremiah, have as yet received their accomplishment in that people. “This is My covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins  But Israel is still under sin.

 

 

6. Our Lord’s present place of intercession on high marks out the day of grace, which is due to His invisible High-priesthood after the manner of Aaron.  But He is coming in power, to save His faithful ones of the earth who are waiting for Him (9: 28), and to make His enemies His footstool.

 

 

7. Some nine or ten times the word which speaks of the future occurs in the Epistle.  Salvation is future; the angels are helping the heirs of the coming day (1: 14).  The fire that shall enwrap the enemies of the Lord has yet to be (10: 27).  Earth has yet to present itself with new features in the blest millennial day (2: 5).  But signs of its blessing were bestowed in the miraculous gifts (6: 5).  Jesus is the High Priest of the better things to come (9: 11).  Of its blessings, Law could only give the shadows (10: 1).  He shall bring the city and kingdom of God, and introduce us within its walls (6: 5; 11: 8; 13: 14).

 

 

May the Lord hasten His coming, and His people’s readiness to meet Him with joy!

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

185

 

AN EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE

TO THE HEBREWS

 

 

BY ROBERT GOVETT, M.A.

 

 

(Heb. 9: 26)

 

 

-------

 

 

“He hath been manifested

 

 

JESUS, from all eternity, was in the bosom of the Father (John 1: 18).  He came forth thence to ‘manifest’ Himself on earth by His life and death.  Thus John the Baptist says:- “I knew Him not, but that He should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come immersing in water” (John 1: 31).  “Without controversy, great is the mystery of godliness; God was manifest in the flesh” (1 Tim. 3: 16; 1 Pet. 1: 20).  The same word is used of the Saviour’s appearances on earth after His resurrection.  “After these things Jesus manifested Himself again to His disciples at the Sea of Tiberius” (John 21: 1).

 

 

“Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe.  And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man” (John 19: 5).

 

 

Two different words in the Greek are employed to distinguish (1) the Saviour’s manifestation in the flesh to us on earth (phaneroo), and (2) His presentation of Himself in resurrection to the Father on high (emphanizo). This last word is very little used by the Septuagint.  There it occurs in Moses’ petition that God would show him His way, that he might know Him (Ex. 23: 13).

 

 

This self-presentation was typified, I believe, on the Day of Atonement.  The high priest was to “take the two goats, and present them before the Lord at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation” (Lev. 16: 7). Thus Christ was led by the high priest and by Israel before the governor to be put to death.

 

 

“Unto the putting away of sin by the sacrifice of Himself

 

 

The entire removal of sin has yet to be accomplished in the new heavens and earth.  Sin will only be finally put away by judgment, which will sever the saved from the lost.

 

 

Christ’s death was His voluntary sacrifice of Himself.

 

 

What, according to Unitarians, are the reasons of the Saviour’s first coming?  To give us perfect instruction, and a perfect example of life.  What says God?  He came to put away sin from man, the lost sinner; and in the only possible way - by His death.

 

 

27, 28. “And as it is reserved unto men once to die, but after that judgment; so the Christ

also having been once offered to bear the sins of many, the second time -

without sin shall be seen by those who are

expecting Him to save them*

 

* This is the order of the Greek, and where two or more constructions are possible, there the order of the Greek [1st. death 2nd. judgment 3rd.  manifestation] -is decisive.

 

 

Death is reserved for men.  It is something in God’s mind, though not visible yet.  So Paul’s crown was reserved for him.  Some would distinguish here, and say, that death does not apply to the saints, who, as in Christ, are beyond death and judgment.  The distinction is valid in those epistles which view the saved as in union with Christ.  But the expression “in Christ” does not appear in Hebrews.  Believers are here regarded as individuals set on earth, and drawing near to God on high.  In this Epistle, Christ Himself is regarded as man, and as treated like men.  The argument is built on it.

 

 

1. For the living, death is reserved.

 

 

2. For the dead, judgment is reserved.  Many understand, ‘after death the judgment as though it taught, that at each one’s decease the final sentence was passed.  The article inserted before judgment has led to this. Now the final sentence does not take place at death, although, as our Lord has shown, there is a placing of each in Hades, suitable to his standing on earth, as already condemned, or as forgiven.  Thus Dives and Lazarus, at once on their departure, are set, one in Paradise, and the other in destruction.  But the final adjustment of the eternal place of each is deferred, until the life and works of each have passed before the judge.

 

 

In this verse is found the answer to a difficulty strongly rested on by anti-millenarians -‘Christ is entered once for all as High Priest and Intercessor into the Holiest above.  How can He ever come out?  His intercession must take place there alone.  It is necessary for the salvation of His Church.  What can avail to take Him thence

 

 

I answer: What brought Moses down from his forty days’ converse with God?  Sin and judgment! (Ex. 32).

 

 

‘Judgment Most seem unable to believe in any dispensation but the one that is running on.  What is this present day?  That of grace; the accepted time proceeding from “the throne of grace  But all the prophets are full of the day of wrath and of judgment soon about to come.  While our Lord is in the Holiest it is the time of God’s patience, and of the ingathering of the elect of the Church.  But the coming Kingdom of Christ is to be warring and judging in righteousness (Rev. 19).  The forty-fifth psalm, quoted in this Epistle, testifies of the Saviour’s advent to earth, and to His Kingdom of righteousness (chap 1).  This takes place when, at His Father’s signal, He rises up, like the ark in motion, and His enemies are scattered before Him.  He is now the Atoning Priest, after the pattern of Aaron.  But even Aaron did not, on the Day of Atonement, remain in the Holiest.  He came forth to bless Israel.  And Jesus is, as the Apostle insists, to appear as High Priest “of the order of Melchizedec Now Melchizedec never appears in a sanctuary: but he appears as both king and priest, and king and priest on earth.  When the Aaronic priesthood is inaugurated, Aaron and his sons abide seven days in the tabernacle; but, on the eighth day, Moses and Aaron come out and bless the people, and the glory appears (Lev. 9).  Till judgment clears the field by power, the wicked increase in wickedness, and our hope appears not, and our salvation cannot come.  Satan till then is not cast out, nor is the [Millennial] Kingdom of Christ come!  Moreover, God has three spheres in which He is at work; not one alone, as the anti-millenarians suppose.  Remove ‘the Church,’ and ‘Jews’ and ‘Gentiles’ remain still (1 Cor. 10: 32).

 

 

This future judgment will take effect on all.  There will be a judgment of Christ’s friends.  “My brethren, be not many masters [teachers], knowing that we shall receive greater condemnation [judgment]” (Jas. 3: 1; 2: 12; Luke 19: 11-27; Gal. 5: 10).  “He that judgeth me is the Lord.  Therefore, judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come” (1 Cor. 4: 4, 5; Matt. 5: 21, 22; 1 John 4: 17; 2 Tim. 4: 8; Heb. 10: 30; 12: 23; 13: 4; Rev. 11: 17, 18).

 

 

The coming judgment is one of the foundations of the faith, and is eternal (Heb. 6: 1, 2).  It is also ‘once for all,’ like death.  It is necessary, in order permanently to sever the evil from the good, and to adjust the stations of the saved.

 

 

This verse tells us, that man’s trial ends with the present life.  Now ’tis mercy, and the call to salvation.  But after death there is no further opening for deliverance.  Judgment comes in, which fixes the destiny of men.

 

 

Thus our Lord, as being man, and made in all things like His brethren, was to die but once, and therefore He can atone but once; so that that requires a perfect and infinite sacrifice.  It is “the Christ” Who was offered. This presents Him as “the anointed High Priest  He is both High Priest and Sacrifice (Lev. 16: 32).

 

 

And, as Jesus was Son of God, and offered an infinite sacrifice, so it can be offered but once.  “He was offered  His passivity as the sacrifice is now set before us.  He “offered Himself as He was High Priest. But as man, and as the victim, He was under obedience, and suffered Himself to be disposed of by His Father. He “was offered and “once for all  For as man He can die but once.  Such is God’s arrangement.

 

 

“To bear the sins of many  The sense of this phrase is very important.  To ‘bear’ sin is often said of a transgressor.  The priests were not to eat any meat torn by beasts, “lest they bear sin and die” (Lev. 22: 9). Again: “Whosoever curseth his God, shall bear his sin” (Lev. 24: 15).  This means that the guilt of it would be on him, and made him obnoxious to its just punishment.  Hence we have often the added phrase: “and die

 

 

To this attaches also the remarkable phrase, “his blood upon his own head to signify the man’s liability to destruction, as a criminal worthy of death.  “It shall be say the spies to Rahab, “that whosoever shall go out of the door of thy house into the street, his blood shall be upon his head, and we will be guiltless: and whosoever shall be with thee in the house, his blood shall be upon our head, if any hand be upon him” (Josh. 2: 19; Lev. 20: 9, 27; 2 Sam. 1: 16).  This gives the more significance to the sinner’s laying his hand upon the head of his sacrifice (Lev. 4: 4).  The sin, and guilt, and penalty of the offender were to pass thereby to the victim, and its blood was taken and presented to God as substitute, in place of the guilty.

 

 

After the laying on of the hand of the offerer, the sacrifice was considered as laden with the sin and its penalty. Thus: “And Aaron shall lay his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit mana man ready for the purpose’ LXX] into the wilderness.  And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited” (Lev. 16: 21, 22).  The disappearance of the goat, then, was the token of the removal of sins.

 

 

But that was only one phase of atonement.  The other was that which was endured by the goat slain as a sin-offering.  It was not only slain, and its blood taken into the Holiest, but it suffered the curse of fire, exhausting the penalty of law as here set forth (1) death, and (2) after death the judgment of fire.

 

 

Thus it was with our Lord. “My righteous Servant shall justify many, for He shall bear their iniquities  “He poured out His soul to death; and He was numbered with the transgressors; and He bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors” (Isa. 53: 12).  “Who His own self bare our sins in His own body on the tree, that we being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness, by Whose stripes ye were healed” (1 Pet. 2: 24).

 

 

Thus, too, the high priest was considered as bearing sins, and putting them away.  The plate of gold “shall be upon Aaron’s forehead, that Aaron may bear the iniquity of the holy things which the children of Israel shall hallow in all their gifts; and it shall be always upon his forehead, that they may be accepted before the Lord” (Ex. 28: 38).  “Thou [Aaron] and thy sons and thy father’s house with thee, shall bear the iniquity of the sanctuary: and thou and thy sons with thee shall bear the iniquity of your priesthood” (Num. 18: 1, 22, 23).  Moses was angry with Aaron’s sons, because they had not eaten the sin-offering in the holy place, “seeing it is most holy, and the Lord hath given it to you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord” (Lev. 10: 17).

 

 

The iniquity when borne by the substitute was put away.  “To bear the sins of many Atonement was made generally for all.  But Christ was the Substitute specially for those who in result shall be saved, whether those of the Old Testament or of the New.  For them the Saviour bore the full penalty, and the curse they had deserved has given place to the blessing merited by our Lord.

 

 

“The second time without sin shall He be seen by those waiting

 

 

Sin being put away by His death, Jesus, like the dead in general, is withdrawn from view.  And His presence above before God, as the High Priest, makes this day the day of mercy.

 

 

He has appeared once on earth. And the Father's counsel is to present Him again the second time on the habitable earth (1: 16). Here then, I again observe, is the answer to the difficulty proposed by the anti-millenarians: ‘How can Christ, having once entered into the Holiest above to intercede, ever leave it  The answer is: That “judgment” is in reserve.  And that will take Christ out of His present place of service on high to earth.  A change is coming over God’s plan.  After so long mercy, wrath is at hand.  The living and the dead, foes and friends, are to be judged.

 

 

The Saviour, then, when He appears the second time, shall come “without sin  He bore the sins of many at His first coming.  He shall bear none any more, nor make atonement again for the guilty.  It is not as Mr. Darby says, ‘that He shall have nothing to do with sin in any shape when He returns.  On the contrary, He comes to avenge sin, by judgment, wherever it is found (1 Thess. 4: 4-6; 2 Thess. 1: 8; Matt. 24; 25; Heb. 12; 13: 4; Rom. 2).  The Saviour came at first, like the high priest on the Day of Atonement, in His robes of humiliation. But He returns as “the Priest after the order of Melchizedec,” in the robes of glory and majesty- as Aaron, after the atonement of the great day was completed, was invested with his attire of beauty and glory.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

186

 

OUR ADVERSARY - THE DEVIL

 

 

BY LANCE B. LATHAM

 

 

 

“Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the Devil, as a roaring lion, walketh

about, seeking whom he may devour: whom resist stedfast in the faith ...”  1 Peter 5 : 8, 9.

 

 

 

MANY Christians are conscious of failure in their lives, of hindrances in the work they are called to do, in their testimony, of times of depression and unusual temptations.

 

 

We are often conscious that we have been completely fooled in some decision we have made, and at such times we wonder why we have failed; why the way seemed blocked when we were sure God was in the thing we felt led to do.  We wonder often why we are depressed in heart, when there is no usual explanation for our feelings. We have not been able to explain how, usually wise in some decisions, we have apparently missed the mark. We have asked at times why prayer has been so difficult when we have “our access” to God in Christ.

 

 

We are prone to blame ourselves.  Sometimes we should.  But again, sometimes we must accept what the Word of God tells us about one - God’s malignant enemy and ours - who is ever alert, looking for the weak places in our armour, eager to take advantage of any opening we give him through sin, unbelief, lack of perseverance. We are apt to underrate the battle which is ours against this powerful enemy.

 

 

There is a great body of truth in Scripture that concerns “our adversary, the Devil  He is presumptuous (Matt. 4: 5, 6), proud (1 Tim. 3: 6), powerful (Eph. 2: 2; 6: 12), wicked (1 John 2: 13), malignant (Job 1: 9; 2: 4), subtle (Gen. 3: 1; 2 Cor. 11: 3), deceitful (2 Cor. 11: 14), fierce, cruel (Luke 4: 29, 39, 42).  The scope and power of his work are beyond comprehension, for he “deceiveth the whole world” (1 John 5: 19; 2 Tim. 3: 13; Rev. 20: 3, 9; 12: 9; 2 Cor. 4: 4).  He has endless energy (Job 1: 7; 1 Pet. 5: 8).

 

 

A vast host of demons, who may be the fallen angels, are under Satan’s authority.  Many are the instances in the Word of God and in the lives of men when demons have possessed men and women to their utter ruin - a condition from which they are delivered only by prevailing prayer and the power of God.

 

 

The Invasion of Human Hearts

 

 

And there have evidently been times when the Devil himself would concentrate on one person, rather than entrust this to a demon.  Witness the fact that the Devil filled Judas Iscariot - a fact which shows his estimate of the importance of that awful mission.  He also filled Ananias in Acts 5 - “Why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost

 

 

We do not find any sure scriptural witness to the Devil or a demon ever entering the life of a believer.*  He may harass, afflict, buffet, sift, oppose the work of the Lord, discourage in prayer - but not enter the body of one truly the Lord’s.  Many of God’s dear saints have been driven to distraction by unscriptural teaching in this direction.  “He that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not” (1 John 5: 18).

 

[* This statement assumes Judas Iscariot was unregenerate.]

 

 

Some reject the sure evidence of demon possession brought to us by many missionaries who have laboured in the lands where Satan has had no opposition for years.

 

 

We who live in America may be in nice homes, in Christian homes, with a Gospel church to attend and kind friends about us, and living in fairly good circumstances.  If so, we can get easily satisfied with conditions in the world immediately about us and fail to realise that this [cursed (Gen. 3: 17ff)] world is not our home.  Especially if we are not living in close fellowship with the Lord, we immerse ourselves in our immediate circle, have little touch with the vast multitude round about us and fail to realise their awful darkness, which will shortly end in Hell [Hades (Lk. 16: 23, 30; Acts 2: 27, 34, R.V.)] and [after resurrection (Rev. 20: 13), in] the lake of fire.

 

 

And this is all part of the Devil’s vast program, blinding not only the eyes of those that believe not, but bringing a measure of that darkness into our lives.  For, if we were in real touch with God, we would be increasingly dissatisfied and longing for the redemption of our bodies and our deliverance from this present world system, all of which is under the direct domination of Satan.

 

 

-------

 

 

OUR BATTLE WITH THE UNSEEN

 

 

BY F. J. PERRYMAN

 

 

These extracts are taken from Mr. Perryman’s “He Must Reign Till -”, a strong

tonic word on prayer in the present crisis. - Ed., [D. M. Panton] DAWN.

 

 

-------

 

 

THE things which stagger and baffle, depress and challenge most people are the persistent alternating and overlapping manifestations of evil in political, social and economic upheavals.  Hatred, revenge, wars, revolutions, strikes, persecutions and all the subtle and terrifying technique of Godless policies follow hard on the heels of each other, and it is not surprising that without God and the Lamp of His Word, people grope in darkness - even gross darkness, with a corresponding apprehension and dread of what will come next.

 

 

But the believer is made so one with Christ by consenting to be “immersed into Him” and “ensphered with Him” that he is in a position to “wrestle against not in order to get victory, but in order to register against these fallen world rulers the Victory of Christ over them.  So that the Cross and all that Christ meant when He cried, “It is finished,” is behind the believer and with him and in him.  “Christ in you  “Ye in Me, and I in you  Jesus had said a day would come when that would be known.  Here it is.  The believer, the Church “in Christ” and “with Christ,” “far above all principalities and powers, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that [‘age’ (Lk. 20: 35; cf. Heb. 6: 5, R.V.)] which is to come

 

 

You see how sweeping it is - how full - how complete!  “Far above all” - a superlative term used only three times in scripture: once of “the cherubim of glory shadowing the Mercy-Seat” (Heb. 9: 5); once of Christ having “ascended up far above all heavens that He might fill all things” (Eph. 4: 10); and in 1: 21 of Christ having been raised to God’s own right hand in the heavenly places, with “all under His feet as Head of the Church united to Him in that position.  We, “far above all in Him and with Him.  I do not know that any summary of this stupendous thing can do justice to it.

 

 

-------

 

 

REPENTANCE

 

 

Only by a national repentance can the Holy Land be restored to a Holy People.  Jehovah has made it clear for all time.  “The anger of the Lord was kindled against this land, to bring upon it all the curse that is written in this book: and the Lord rooted them out of their land in anger, and in wrath, and in great indignation, and cast them into another land, as at this day.  And when thou shalt return unto the Lord thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul: that then the Lord thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the peoples, whither the Lord thy God hath scattered thee.  If any of thine outcasts be in the uttermost parts of heaven, from thence will the Lord thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee: and the Lord thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers (Deut. 29: 27)

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

187

 

IRVINGISM

 

 

BY CECIL CLARK

 

 

 

An extraordinarily pregnant warning on the return of the supernatural - good or evil - is embodied in Irvingism.  Originating in a band of' earnest Presbyterians, among whom ‘unknown tongues’ suddenly burst out in a public assembly, it ended after decades - led by the supernatural utterance - in applying for admission to the Church of Rome, but was rejected on refusing to accept the Creed of the Council of Trent.  Its ‘prophecy’ was that our Lord would return before their last ‘apostle’ died; but the last apostle died in 1901.  This sympathetic summary by (probably) an Anglo-Catholic in The Guardian (May 17, 1946) fails to grapple with the problem, nor warns of the perils of the untested supernatural. - ED., [D.M. Panton] DAWN.

 

 

-------

 

 

A FEW weeks ago there died in London, at the age of 88, Basil Seton, “Angel” and head of the stately Catholic Apostolic, or “Irvingite” church in Gordon Square.  The Bishop of London visited him not long before he died, and the earnest Anglican vicar took his funeral.  He was head of a Christian community which is fast fading away.  No one can save it, and no one can join it.  Founded a hundred years ago on the belief that a new Pentecost had taken place, and that Christ had appointed twelve new Apostles to proclaim to divided Christendom His imminent return, the whole thing has looked to outsiders a pathetic as well as a fantastic affair.

 

 

It all began with Edward Irving, popular Scots Minister first at Hatton Garden, then at Regent Square, where the imposing building, built in 1827, with its front a replica of York Minster, still stands.  Irving preached the immediate coming of Christ.  He went up to preach at Roseneath in Dunbartonshire for the minister there, who had also attended the conferences.  As a result, a young woman, Mary Campbell, ill with consumption and near to death, not only recovered instantaneously, but also proceeded to speak with “tongues” and to “prophesy The same kind of thing began to happen elsewhere, and at Irving’s own church in London.  The Albury conference people made investigations, and most of them became convinced that the Holy Spirit was speaking through certain persons in a special way.  Irving, not long after, was expelled from the Scots Kirk.

 

 

Next, the “prophet” had begun to designate “apostles,” and Irving ceased to be prominent.  Within a short time he died.  By 1835 the Apostles numbered twelve.  They consisted of eight Anglicans, three Scottish Presbyterians and one Independent.  They included three clergymen, three barristers, three gentlemen of means (two of them members of Parliament), an artist, a merchant, and one who filled the position of “Keeper of the Tower  These twelve were accepted as true Apostles like the original twelve Apostles; together with them they made the twenty-four of Rev. 4: 4.  Their rule was absolute.  It has been fairly said of them that “some were of the highest standing socially and politically, some possessed the greatest ability as scholars and theologians, all were men of unblemished character, soundness in the faith and abundant  zeal in Christian labours  The twelve retired to Albury and ordained, in due course, “angels” (bishops) and priests, all, however, to continue their ordinary work in the world.

 

 

At the forefront of Catholic Apostolic belief was the conviction that the end of all * things was at hand.  Though the Christian Church at large paid no heed, the witness must be continued through the “body” of those who did accept “the work  But now time was passing on.  One by one the Apostles died, and although coadjutors were appointed, the last survivor, in 1901, died also.  The expectation of our Lord’s return was not realized, but the witness of the Catholic Apostolic body had to be continued.  No more ordinations could take place, for none but an Apostle could ordain.  From then onwards the days of the Church were numbered.  But so, believed the faithful, were the days of the world.  Gradually, however, the ministers have passed away.  Church after church has been closed, the members then going to their parish church when attendance at another Catholic Apostolic church become impracticable.  At Gordon Square church, with the death of the “Angel” there remain but two priests to continue the Liturgy.  When they have died the services must come to an end, for no one alive to-day has authority to transfer priests, even if there were any available.

 

[* See three additional quotations.]

 

 

It is difficult for outsiders to share the belief in the supposed Divine origin of the Catholic Apostolic Church.  It appears to the onlooker an all too slender a case that any new Apostolate was instituted.  We more readily can believe that these good men were mistaken.  But what then?  It is extremely difficult for a Churchman who really knows the Catholic Apostolics to escape the conviction that they and their successors have been guided into much truth, and shielded from much error.  They have, during these hundred years, been greatly blessed. We should approach these people not only with sympathy, but with humility.

 

 

-------

 

 

 

 

1. “Canaan in Solomon’s earlier years pictures that millennial day when the true Prince of peace shall reign before His ancients gloriously.

 

 

This latter aspect it is that is mainly that such as never enter the Land never will enjoy its delights and glory.  The redeemed but earth-bound heart to-day, neither knowing nor seeing the things that are above, content to believe his soul to be safe from Hell - [i.e., ‘the lake of fire’ (Rev. 20: 15).] - will take no part in the conflicts under Joshua and David, and will have no share in the glories of Solomon’s household and government.  ‘Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall”

- G. H. Lang.

 

 

2. “ ‘Let no one rob you of your prize by a voluntary humility and worshipping of the angels, dwelling in the things which he hath seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, and not holding fast the Head, from whom the body, being supplied and knit together through the joints and bands, increaseth with the increase of God

 

 

This does not, indeed, help to the deciding what is the ‘prize’, but it does most strongly accentuate the WARNING that the PRIZE may be lost, and further and plainly shows that there are FOES [even from amongst the regenerate!] who will bring about the LOSS if possible, and this by inducing any state of heart, or any line of worship or of conduct, which may suffice to cause the christian to relax his [or her] hold on Christ, not necessarily as Redeemer, but as ‘Head of the body, the church’.”

- G. H. Lang.

 

 

3. “Whoever neglects the Second Coming has only a mutilated Gospel, for the Bible teaches us not only the death and sufferings of Christ, but also HIS RETURN TO REIGN IN HONOUR AND GLORY.  His Second coming is mentioned and referred to three hundred times, yet I was in the church fifteen or sixteen years before I ever heard a sermon on it.”

- D. L. Moody.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

188

 

AN APPEAL TO PENTECOSTALISTS

 

 

BY A. G. TILNEY, B.A.*

 

 

[* “Albert G. Tinley, B.A. Hons. (London) was senior modern languages master at Portsmouth Southern Secondary School and Pastor of Elm Grove Free Church, Hayling Island, Hants. … his contribution to the [British Evolution Protest] Movement exceeded that of other secretaries in years of office, travel and literary output.  In addition to his personal duties and being the Secretary of the Prophecy Investigation Society, he was the author of a number of booklets and articles on prophecy.

 

Tinley himself has written: ‘Merit (or worthiness) it must be maintained in the teeth of all denial, as a condition and qualification for the First Resurrection… (Luke 20: 35). … Priests of God and of Christ, they shall reign with him a thousand years … not instead of eternally, but Millennially before eternity proper begins.  Others - proud, indulgent, cowardly - are judged unworthy of Christ and of aeonian life.  Now we know from several epistles that SOME BELIEVERS WILL BE EXCLUDED FROM THIS KINGDOM of heaven and of God (Eph. 5: 5-8). … We are warned … ‘the rest of the dead (saved and unsaved) lived not again until the 1000 years were ended’ (Rev. 20: 5)…”]

 

-------

 

 

 

FIRST of all let me say that we do not depreciate you dear good People.  You are at times described as the ‘cream of Christians,’ and we are prepared to agree, though preferring, instead, the Scriptural epithet of ‘very elect’ (Mtt. 24: 24), whom Satan is after deceiving. Poor dull Christians who are already listless, if not lifeless, the devil can afford to neglect. But as an ‘angel of light’ he aims at the orthodox, keen and devoted; and you, as we, need the whole armour of God, with the piercing, discerning Sword.  What we emphasise is that in this matter of Tongues we are not assured and satisfied that you are not deceived, and assured that you are not we can never really be so long as the Divinely appointed tests are not applied and passed.

 

 

As to your Tongues, there seems to be a contradiction; for while on the one hand they are emphasised and insisted upon as the test and touchstone of our having received the Holy Spirit, they are, on the other hand, pushed or put into the background as something less secret and esoteric than questionable.  Apostolic speaking in Tongues was the means of converting multitudes of unsaved foreigners (for which outsiders Tongues were intended, 1 Cor. 14: 22), and, negatively, the 3,000 converts were not made to talk in Tongues; but these tests you Pentecostalists have simply inverted.  For Tongues are useless to your missionaries, yet you encourage them in your proselytes.  Tongues (though not, if true, to be forbidden) are the least and lowest of the miraculous Gifts - 1/20 of 1% of words with the understanding, says the inspired Apostle; and, especially if no interpreter be present, the easiest to counterfeit and be deceived by.

 

 

Satan sends out “ministers of righteousness” - not unrighteousness, but righteousness, we are told.  They can talk about God, quote Scripture, recommend the Lord’s servants and the way of salvation - as they must be able to, if they are to deceive - take in and be taken in by the very elect, the cream of Christians.  Blasphemy would not do, obscenity still less.  They must be orthodox, earnest, zealous, able to cast out demons, to heal, to inspire, to prophesy in Christ’s name, to do many wonderful works.  They disarm and attract rather than alarm and repel.  Who then can tell them, detect them, expose them?  How unmask those who wear no mask?  How analyse their poisoned sweets, how fight their dope?  How probe the unorthodoxy of the apparently quite orthodox?  It just cannot be done, the disguise is too complete; so the unsuspecting are taken unawares, while the convinced and satisfied - the overcome - will heed no warning.

 

 

The God who has given us the tests and commanded their application will surely be more affronted if we refuse than if we use them.  It is neither presumption nor blasphemy to use God’s own recommended safeguard, to make honest and reverent inquiry. Rank disobedience and wilful pride it is to refuse to test as God ordains.  Otherwise you dear good people have an unprotected and vulnerable heel of Achilles.  For you have steadily, and studiedly failed and refused in this one vital thing.  You have rejected a counsel of God against yourselves.  This test alone is the key, proof and guarantee.

 

 

Prayer to-day is quite inadequate, we have no oracle to give reply; hence asking God is not His present way; nor is inventing our own questions and testings.  By John’s day many deceivers and false prophets had gone out into the world, and the result was uncertainty, confusion with - to-day - a clear and clamant call for these critical tests (put not to the medium but to the speaking spirit):- “Is Jesus Christ come (and coming) in the flesh Silence, here, is denial.  And on these points all untested spirits are allowed to be silent and therefore denying.  “Every spirit that confesseth NOT that Jesus Christ is come” (1 John 4: 3) - and coming (2 John 7) - in the flesh is NOT OF GOD  Believe not every spirit. Have you tested “your spirit my brother, my sister?  Have you given it (or him) the chance of the positive confirmatory reply? (1 John 4: 2).  God gladly responds to His own gracious passwords, His friendly “shibboleths”; for these are the incarnation and bodily resurrection and return of the Lord Jesus Christ, His Son, our Saviour: passwords hateful however, and impossible, to the enemy.  You believe these, of course; but does “your spirit”?

 

 

Even in 1 Cor. 12: 1-4 (where it concerns less “spiritual gifts” than ‘inspired’ people) there are tests not of the man, but of the spirit speaking through him under inspiration from above or from below.  Of course, a good Christian (like yourself) would call Jesus Lord, but, a deceitful spirit speaking through him (and only a deceiving spirit could get into him, with its forged papers and false passports, so to speak), a deceiving spirit would refuse - and make his medium refuse - to reply when so addressed, refusing to call Jesus Lord, freezing into sullen silence.

 

 

Let “your spirit” confess Jesus as God manifest in the flesh in His own appointed way, and I am for you, and with you.  Will you?  Dare you?  Dare you not?  “TRY THE SPIRITS, WHETHER THEY ARE OF GOD

 

 

-------

 

 

EVIL SPIRITS

 

 

JESUS has warned us that as the [present, evil] age comes to its end there will be many false prophets and false teachers who will come in His name, and they will do great signs and wonders.

 

 

Healings are imitated and produced by the devil.  Why not, if it serves his purpose?  If he can deceive people through miraculous healings, of course he will do it.  There are religious movements which are strongly organised in all the world that have their phenomena.  They have their miraculous healings, they have their deliverances.  And some dear folks seem to be so credulous that they would accept healing even from the devil himself if they might be relieved of their physical pains.  It would be better for us to endure the most excruciating pain rather than to accept deliverance at the hand of Satan!

 

 

The gift of tongues also is imitated by the devil.  You can find this manifestation in spiritist meetings and you can find it among the heathen who have never heard of the Lord Jesus Christ.  “If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret  Now I have been in meetings that were a veritable babble of confusion, and there have been dozens, it seemed, who were all babbling at the same time, and nobody in the world could understand what was being said and no interpreter was present to tell anybody.  I’ve seen that happen!  That is directly against the Scriptures and God is not in it. - DR. L. H.  ZIEMER

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

189

 

AN EXPOSITION OF THE

GOSPEL OF JOHN

 

 

BY  ROBERT GOVETT, M.A.

 

 

(John 15: 4 [and continued a little further on from the author’s commentary.])

 

 

 

Here is the secret of a Christian life.  It is not effort to be good.  It is not the earnest attempt to scourge the flesh into goodness.  It is the abiding in Christ.  It is (1) negatively, the seeing that in us, as children of Adam, dwells no good thing.  And no amount of restraint or pressure, no abundant task-work, can produce in it what is good.  ‘The old man’ is wholly evil.  It is not renewed by grace, but put off.  We are by the Holy Spirit’s energy grafted into Christ, as the branch is in the vine.  We retain that place by faith (Eph. 3: 17).  It is - ‘You are in Christ, and in Him is treasured for you whatever you lack  He of God is ‘made unto us wisdom and righteousness, sanctification and redemption  We need only to ask of Him strength and wisdom, to meet every duty.  We have no independent power.  We are not encouraged to strive to attain it.  ‘The branch cannot bear fruit from itself  It does not produce the life or the sap which it needs, in order to fruit.  Severed from the tree, it dies.  Thus, then, from Christ, the life and sap which dwell in Him are to flow into us.  The finger can only grow and move by the blood sent into it from the head and heart.

 

 

‘The branch cannot bear fruit from itself  That was the question upon which God was giving evidence for 4000 years.  Man was being tested under God’s hand to see if, as a subject under the moral government of God, he could be made to be obedient.  Law tested man, and found him wanting.  And now the cross of the Son of God has closed that question.  Man is evil; and if left to himself, neither promise nor threat will make him obedient.

 

 

But each one who is in Christ can bear fruit.  God accepts a life of obedience to Him and His Son, in every sphere of society.  Let no one imagine that only those employed in preaching, or giving tracts, or in work directly religious, are serving God.

 

 

The vine can live without the branch: the branch cannot live without the vine.  If you would bear fruit, fear to refuse any of Christ’s words.

 

 

‘Abide in Me is the one law of life to the branch.  Obey, and you will be fruitful!  Disobey, and be barren!  Even when renewed, we may not trust our own feelings and strength.  Of this Peter is an eminent witness.

 

 

‘Abide in Me.’  Christ must be both a Man, and one risen from the dead, to give us the aid we lack.  But He must also be God; else He has no fulness, out of which to supply the innumerable multitude of the saved of different climes and many ages.

 

 

‘Abide  Great is the danger in our day of imagining that the subtle wit of man, so earnest and successful in the things of time, has advanced beyond Christ and His Gospel.  ‘Abide ‘Progress’ is men’s word.  ‘Abide’ is God’s, ‘He that progresseth (true reading) and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God’ (2 John 9).

 

 

This is not like the Law.  Such words would be blasphemy in Moses’ mouth.  It was not by strength derived from Moses that each Israelite was to serve and to please God.  Any such saying would have exposed Moses to stoning, as a blasphemer.  Law deals with each as a son of Adam, bound to furnish to God a complete obedience of heart and hand.  It sets every one singly before God, to stand or fall by his own particular merits.  As knowing what was right, as bound by promises attached to obedience, and by threats and penalties on sin, he was to keep the path of right.  But on such grounds the fallen cannot stand.  Conscience, while it points out the right, is overborne by the passions which lead it captive.  It is like Jeremiah the prophet testifying to the remnant in the land, from God’s lips, that if they would abide there, they should be spared and blest.  But they would not hear, and would go down into Egypt, whether the prophet agreed or no.

 

 

How are we to abide in Christ?  (1) Practically by obeying Christ’s commands.  The disobedient to Christ is not abiding in Him.  (2) Theoretically, by holding all Christ’s doctrines.  We are to grow also in the after-knowledge of God.  And God is known only in His Son.  We are to hold fast what we have of the knowledge of the Son of God.  We are to go onwards in it.  ‘Grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ Whatever interrupts communion with Christ interrupts growth and fruit.  Shake faith, and you stop growth and obedience.

 

 

5. ‘I am the Vine, ye are the branches.  He that abideth in Me, and I in him, beareth much fruit; for apart from Me ye can do nothing

 

 

Jesus is the Lord of supply, of life, and sap.  This is true of all His saved ones.  But here is an union not contemplated by the Law of Moses - the union of Messiah and believers.  Law had no idea of God’s Anointed save as an individual man, like other men.  It was part of the ‘untraceable riches of the Christ that, while Law was in abeyance and Israel in unbelief, there should be ‘a new man’ gathered out of Jew and Gentile; so knit to the Son of God, and so enjoying life in Him, that it should do His works and suffer His suffering in a world of unbelief; to shine with Him in His glory, and to abide in unity with Him [in His coming Kingdom and] throughout eternity.  Jesus here begins to proclaim this truth, which is more fully detailed to us by Paul, the commissioned teacher of this great and central truth of Christianity.  ‘Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me contained the germs of that which is his chief testimony, and appears in essence here.  Only Paul’s view was ‘Jesus on high, and we in Him  Here it is Jesus in us, while we are on trial here below.

 

 

The Lord Jesus takes the supreme place.  He is the Head of all supply; such a place as could belong to no mere man, and so it is due to His Godhead.  On our side there is to be acceptance of Christ’s testimony and obedience to His commands.  Then the fruit of the Spirit and its good works will be found in us.

 

 

Without Christ we can do nought.  (1) Nothing, even of natural action.  Even Christ’s foes call only lift their voice or their arm, through strength derived from Him.  (2) Still more, nought spiritually good can be done without Him.

 

 

‘The old man is corrupting according to the lusts of deceit  Here is the New Man, the accepted before God; and they who are justified in Him, are by Him to be supplied, and to bear fruit to God.  Law was the trial of the old man, and it brought forth fruit unto death.

 

 

With the abiding in Christ, the standing apart from Him is contrasted.  Such defaulters are evil in will, blind in under standing.  ‘No work of such an one is good before God, however much praised by men  Such actions are only splendid sins (Matt. 7: 18).

 

 

6. ‘If any abide not in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them, and cast into the fire, and they burn

 

 

In ver. 2 we had the not bearing fruit, though the abiding in Christ was not gone.  Here there is the not abiding in Christ with its results.  As abiding in Christ produces fruit, so the man who does not abide, not only does not furnish fruit, and please God, but so displeases, as to draw down punishment the most severe.

 

 

This is a very difficult verse, as all know.  I think I have the key to it.  But I do not think that the true interpretation will be pleasing.  I will only endeavour, as the Lord shall aid, to give its real sense.  If you, reader, are displeased with the messenger, because you do not like the message, I must nevertheless give the message, because I have not to please myself, but to please the Lord by faithfulness to Him and His truth.

 

 

(1) How shall we interpret the passage?  Is this spoken of a believer? or of an unbeliever?

 

 

Difficulties attend both views.  (1) Say it is an unbeliever.  Interpret it thus - ‘that union with Christ can only be eternal.  The man belongs to Christ sacramentally.  He professes to be His; he was united to Christ by Baptism, and the Supper  Is there in a living vine any outward union alone?  Would a dead twig tied to a vine-stem be said to be in the vine? Impossible!  The person here was once ‘in’ Christ.  But he did not abide in the position given him.  He who was in, is cast out.  He once was a green branch.  He then ‘withers or more strongly, ‘is dried up.’  There can be no withering in a branch already dead.  The withered branch is one that has passed from life to death.  These words, then, cannot be spoken of any but one who once had living union with Christ.  They must be spoken then of a [regenerate] believer.

 

 

(2) But so interpret it, and another difficulty confronts you.  Is the believer, then, finally to lose spiritual life, and to perish?  Is this not contrary to the grace of God, which assures eternal life to those once in Christ?  Is not this the testimony of many Scriptures? And of our Lord Himself in this very Gospel? Chapter 10: 28, ‘My sheep shall not perish for ever, neither shall any pluck them out of My hand

 

 

There is a remarkable change of tenses in this verse.  The two first verbs are in the past, the three last in the present; and yet the two first relate to an earlier time than the three last.  The only way, I suppose, to understand the matter, is to regard our Lord as viewing things from the point of the day of judgment.  Then the not abiding, and being cast out, and withering, will be past; and the three other steps will then be taken.

 

 

It appears, then, that here we have depicted for us the results, moral and governmental, of not abiding in Christ.  Not abiding in the Vine, the man is cast out of the Vine: as the branch broken off from the stem.

 

 

The issue is ‘drying up  All believers derive some grace from Christ.  That grace is to then life and sap.  But as soon as union is broken between the stem and the branch, the supply of sap is cut off.  The sap which was within begins to pass out.  The leaf flags and withers, the wood grows dry.  So with any who do not abide in Christ.  The grace which was once in them departs.* They become more and more like the failing sons of Adam.  It may be, they become worse than they ever were.  This deterioration takes effect continually.

 

[* NOTE: See also Acts 5: 32: “And we are witnesses of these things; and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God hath given to them that obey him

 

Compare the above with Ps. 51: 11, (Septuagint, LXX. translation), where the word ‘spirit,’ in most English translations, is rendered ‘Spirit’ in 1 Sam. 16: 13: “…and the Spirit of the Lord came upon David from that day forward: … (14) And the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the Lord tormented him.” (Septuagint (LXX).  And gain, in the life of Samson, God’s Nazarite, we read: “… and the Spirit of the Lord came powerfully upon him…” (Judges 14: 6, LXX): but after a period of disobedience, and his loss of  Divine power:  “he knew not that the Lord,” - i.e.,  the Holy Spirit - “was departed from him.” (16: 20, Septuagint.)]

 

 

Then comes ‘the gathering such together  There are two periods in which this may take place.  (1) Now.  The fallen Christian associates himself with his fellows: men in spirit like himself.  Each encourages the other in unbelief, and enmity to the [accountability and prophetic] truth.  Satan has his synagogue, as well as Christ His Church. [i.e., His ‘out-calling’.]

 

 

(2) But the chief force of the words, as the next clause seems to prove, relates to the day of judgment.  This runs quite parallel with the parable of the wheat and the tares.  ‘Shall we go and gather together the tares say the servants to the Master.  And the answer is - ‘No!  Not you, and not now.  In the day of judgment at My coming I will command My reaping angels, and they shall first gather together the tares, then bind them in bundles to burn them  ‘As therefore the darnel are gathered together, and burnt in the fire, so shall it be in the end of the age.  The Son of man shall send forth His angels, and they shall gather together out of His Kingdom all stumbling blocks, and those which do iniquity, and shall cast them into the furnace of fire; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.  He that hath ears to hear, let him hear  These, remember, were Jesus’ words to His disciples, enquiring of Him in the house the sense of the parable.

 

 

What conclusion, then, must we reach? (1) The man is a [regenerate] believer; (2) the offending one is to be punished; (3) the believer shall not perish utterly, and forever; for God’s promise to the effect encircles His elect.  Then this casting into the fire of the dried up branch cannot be forever.  And we know that there is a period of a thousand years which precedes eternity: a thousand years during which the righteous and the wicked shall be recompensed in the earth; as Scripture says (Prov. 11: 31).  And this is confirmed by other passages, as Matt. 5: 22, 29, 30; 18: 34, 35; Luke 12: 46-48.

 

 

What, then, is this not abiding in Christ?  It is twofold.  (1) Practical: backsliding, turning to the flesh and the world.  And how great an extant this may be done by [regenerate] believers, many know, or may easily perceive, on looking around.  Some who once knew Christ, are now suffering the felon’s punishment for offences committed against the law of the land.  Some are overcome in the snare of the drunkard, and, while at times struggling, and always unhappy, yet go on [unrepentant] riveting their chains.

 

 

(2) But the worst form of it is doctrinal departure from Christ and His truth.

 

 

We do not, in our day, understand the awful results of entire doctrinal departure from the true views concerning God and His Christ.  Out of that intellectual departure springs the grossest evil in spirit and conduct.  In John’s day this was seen, and his epistles are a warning to us [‘Christians’ (Acts 11: 26)] how far [disobedient and deceived] men may wander from fundamental truth, while yet retaining the name of Christ.

 

 

In John’s Epistles, we see that there are those who imagined that a man might perfectly know God, and yet walk in all the wickedness of the world.  That, while there was light in God, there was darkness also.  If so, it was no wonder if there was a mixture of the two in His [redeemed and regenerate] children.  That Christ left no commandments, and it was only legal to observe them.  They divided Jesus from Christ, denying the Godhead of Jesus, who was a mere man, born as others of Joseph and Mary.  They denied on the other hand, the manhood of Christ.  He was never born; He was a being more than angel, but less than God; who came on the man Jesus at the Jordan, and left Him before His arrest.  Out of this lie of the devil, which undoes all the scheme of Christianity, arose the most entire devotion to the world, the most awful hatred of true Christians, and all other sins of the flesh.  The Spirit of Antichrist was at work, and the denial of the Father and Son was bold.  It is to this state of things, far worse than any now to be seen, that the threat of the Saviour especially applies.  We have not beheld the height to which practical wickedness can reach, till doctrinal principles, destructive of the Gospel, and of all righteousness, have taken root.  Men feel insecure in wickedness, till they have some plea, which will seem to justify it to conscience, and to shelter them from fears of the coming judgment.  To what a pitch they will rise, may be seen in the Epistles of Jude, and 2nd Peter.

 

 

In the last words there is a word of warning to the true Christians to look onward to Christ’s coming judgment, and to seek His approval (2: 14).  Also to beware, lest they should be swept into the current of false doctrine, with its issues of iniquity (17).

 

 

7. ‘If ye abide in Me, and My words abide in you, whatever ye wish ye may ask, and it shall be done unto you

 

 

Here is the contrast to the case supposed in the previous verse.  This is one of the conditions of the fulfilment of our prayers.  (1) We are to abide in Christ: practically and doctrinally.  He says not here, as in verse 4, ‘And if I abide in you  For the failure is not on His side.  The abiding of Christ’s words in us, is now given as the other side.  For the words of Christ proceeding from the Son and the Father, He in whom the words of God abide, abides in the Son.

 

 

Often the prayers of Christians, by reason of their non-obedience to this word, are not fulfilled.  Often it would be harmful to us, if just what we ask were given.  The Christian arrived at this point of attainment, would not ask in the flesh, and seek to turn God’s mind concerning the subject of His prayer; but would be so in harmony with Him, as to ask just what God desires and intends, and so would assuredly obtain it.

 

 

‘If My words abide in you  Some are teaching now, as the fruit of advanced knowledge of dispensational truth, that the Gospels, even that of John, are not for the Church.  Do you, on the contrary, hold and teach, that Christ’s words are our God-given guide.  If we would have our prayers heard, His words are not only to be regarded, but to dwell in us.  His commands are to be our rule, His promises our hope.  His words and a sense of our need will stir us up to prayer; and to our prayer He will send answers of blessing.  Our prayers are not restricted.  They may relate to things temporal, [e.g., “Thy kingdom come.  Thy will be done, as in heaven, so on earth:” (Matthew 6: 10, R.V.).] or to things eternal.  [e.g., “And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth are passed away; and the sea is no moreRev. 21: 1. cf. 2 Pet. 3: 10-13, R.V.).]

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

190

 

THE TARES

 

 

BY ARLEN L. CHITWOOD

 

 

Matthew 13: 24-30

 

 

 

The first two parables in Matthew, chapter thirteen are explained by the Lord Himself and form the basic framework for a proper understanding of all the parables. The sowing of individuals in various places throughout the world in the first parable is the same as the sowing of the good seed in the field in the second parable.  In our Lord’s own explanation we are told, “The one who sowed the good seed is the Son of man.  The field is the world, and the good seed stands for the sons of the kingdom ...” (vv. 37, 38a).  This sowing has to do with the Lord Jesus Christ placing sons of the kingdom (Christians) in various localities throughout the world, with a view to their bringing forth fruit for the kingdom.

 

 

The first parable concerns itself exclusively with sons of the kingdom being sown in various places throughout the world.  Although the sowing of sons of the kingdom is mentioned again in the second parable, this parable concerns itself mainly with another type of sowing - an enemy sowing weeds among the wheat (tares among the sons of the kingdom).  As soon as the servants realized that tares had been sown in the field among the wheat they asked, “Do you want us to go and pull them up” (v. 28)?  But he replied, ‘No,’ ... “because while you are pulling the weeds (tares), you may root up the wheat with them.  Let both grow together until the harvest ...” (vv. 29, 30a).  The tares are to remain in the field among the wheat until the harvest and are to be gathered by the harvesters.  Once again we have our Lord’s own explanation concerning this part of the parable: “The weeds (tares) are the sons of the evil one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil.  The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels” (vv. 38b, 39).

 

 

The first and second parables are bound together chronologically.  The wheat - good seed - is sown in the field first.  Once a true testimony concerning the Lord Jesus Christ has been established in the world, Satan appears on the scene and sows tares among the wheat - sons of the devil among sons of the kingdom.  The sons of the devil bear false testimony concerning the message of the kingdom.  The sowing of the sons of the kingdom and the sons of the devil continue uninterrupted throughout the present age.

 

 

One very important thing to keep in mind is the fact that the tares are sown among the wheat.  Satan does not sow tares where there is no wheat.  The chief characteristic of the tare, or darnel as some call it, is that it is many times indistinguishable to the eye (especially an untrained eye) from wheat until the time of harvest.  At the time of harvest (the end of this [evil] age) the wheat is shown to produce golden grain, but the grain of the tare is shown to be black.

 

 

Any good counterfeit will closely approximate the genuine.  When an individual today produces counterfeit money, he first studies the genuine.  A good counterfeiter will then produce notes which will closely approximate the genuine that only a trained eye can distinguish the difference.  How does one detect a counterfeit?  Study the genuine, not the counterfeit.  Men in charge of banks and businesses around the country take this approach.  They require their employees to study the genuine notes, and when bogus notes are presented they will recognize them to be different and know immediately that something is wrong.  We are never told to study the tares or study error.  We are always told to study the genuine, study the truth: “IF THEY SPEAK NOT ACCORDING TO THIS WORD, THEY HAVE NO LIGHT OF DAWN” (Isa. 8: 20). One distinguishes truth from error by knowing the truth, not by knowing error.

 

 

Tares are to be found in the mainstream of Christian Churches.  They can be found in the congregation, in the pulpit, in the chairs of Bible schools, colleges, and seminaries.  Somewhere down the line they heard and rejected the “message about the kingdom” (Matt. 13: 19) and subsequently received a false message.  This false word may take a number of forms, but Christians should not concern themselves with all the various forms.  They need to know the TRUTH ALONE, and any form which deviates from the truth will reveal itself to be false.

 

 

Many times the tares conduct their lives in the eyes of the world in a manner which is more above reproach than the way others conduct their affairs.  Some regenerate believers are so presently caught up in the things of this present age (not having ever heard the ‘message of the kingdom’ that they appear to resemble what many believe tares should resemble more so than do some of the tares themselves.  But the idea that tares appear in their true form and not as sons of the kingdom is a false concept.  We read in 2 Cor. 11: 13-15 of “deceitful workmen and of Satan himself masquerading as “an angel of light  It is not surprising then, if his “servants” - [those deceived by him, and blinded to the gospel of the glory of Christ] - “masquerade as servants of righteousness  The wolf, to deceive the flock, does not appear in his true form.  He appears in sheep’s clothing. (Matt. 7: 15; Acts 20: 29-32).

 

 

LEAVE THE TARES ALONE

 

 

A common fallacy among the regenerate is that one can distinguish whether or not a person is a son of the kingdom by the way he acts, talks, etc.  But this is not true.  For example: David didn’t look like a son of the kingdom when he was committing adultery with Bathsheba and murdering Uriah the Hittite, but he was; nor did Peter look like a son of the kingdom when he was cursing and denying that he even knew the Lord, but he was.  Some Christians use Matt. 7: 20, “Thus by their fruit you will recognize them in an effort to determine whether or not a person is regenerate.  But Matt. 7: 20 cannot be used in this manner.  The context of this verse has to do with “false prophets” (vv. 15-19), not regenerate believers.  Others use 1 John 2: 3, 4 in trying to show how one can determine whether or not a person is saved: “Ye can be sure we know him if we obey his commands.  The man who says, ‘I know himbut does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him  However these verses have to do with two categories of regenerate individuals, not with the regenerate and the unregenerate. The Greek word for “know” in this passage refers to an experiential knowledge, and one comes into possession of this knowledge through the experience of keeping His commands.  No one is even in a position to enter into this knowledge through keeping His commands until after he has been eternally saved.

 

 

The very purpose of a Christian’s eternal salvation is to enter into this knowledge and bring forth fruit, but the sad part is that innumerable Christians will enter into eternity barren.  Four classes of [regenerate] Christians appear in the parable of the Sower.  They are sown out in the world with a view to their bringing forth fruit for the kingdom, but the end result is that three of the four produce no fruit at all.  1 Cor. 3: 11-15 relates the same tragic outcome for many regenerate believers’ barrenness, accompanied by shame, when judged by the Lord.  Thus, fruitfulness or unfruitfulness cannot be criteria for determining whether or not a person is regenerate.

 

 

Any Christian attempting to root up the tares may root up some of the wheat in the process.  The Lord Himself so stated.  The Lord commanded His disciples to leave the tares alone, and He personally would supervise the separation of the tares from the wheat at the end of this evil age.

 

 

SUBSERSIVE MINISTRY OF THE TARES

 

 

In Matt. 28: 19, 20 a dual command is given concerning the business of the Lord which Christians are to carry on during the present age: “Disciple and then “Teach God has, in turn, placed evangelists and pastor-teachers in the Church to facilitate and carry out these tasks (Eph. 4: 11).  The task of the evangelist is to reach the unsaved with the gospel of the grace of God.  He “calls” the lost sheep, and those who respond become saved sheep.  The saved sheep are then to be placed under the care of a pastor-teacher.  They are babes in Christ and in need of spiritual nourishment.  They are to grow under the ministry of the pastor-teacher from immature babes in Christ to mature adults in Christ.  The pastor-teacher is to be instrumental in the sheep being “called out” - “called” under the ministry of the evangelist, and “called out” under the ministry of the pastor-teacher (cf. Matt. 22: 14).

 

 

The moment a person is saved (i.e., becomes regenerate, ‘born again’.) born from above, he finds himself among the “called among the group consisting the body of Christ.  There is then a further selection which Christians are to fix their attention upon - a removal from the body to form the bride of Christ, i.e., a “calling out” from [amongst] the “called

 

 

Basic teachings surrounding the Bride’s removal from the Body are set forth in the original type in the first three chapters of Genesis.  God’s past work in bringing Eve into existence and His present work in bringing His Son’s Bride into existence must be studied in the light of one another.  The First Adam possessed a bride who had been removed from his body to rule as consort queen with him.  ALL of Eve was OF the body, but she was not ALL the body.  She was built into a bride from only a small part of the body.  Thus it will be in the experiences of the Last Adam and His Bride.  The bride will be removed from the body - a selection out of a selection, a calling out from the called.  The type has been set, and the antitype MUST follow the type.

 

 

The tares sown among the wheat have progressively produced a breakdown of the dual command in Matt. 28: 19-20.  The evangelistic part of this command is to go into all the world and make disciples out of all nations. Christians, rather than going into all the world, have turned this command around by inviting the world into the Church to hear the evangelistic message - something unheard of in the New Testament evangelism.

 

 

Inviting the world into the Church to hear the gospel of Grace has, in turn, produced a breakdown of the teaching ministry of the Church.  The pastor-teacher is to provide instruction and guidance for those who have already been saved.  He is to be instrumental in leading the regenerate into a mature knowledge of the Word of God.  His basic responsibilities revolve around the “calling out” of saints from the “called,” not a “calling” from the world.  When the unregenerate are invited in among the regenerate and the pastor-teacher begins doing the work of an evangelist, Christians placed under his ministry always suffer the consequences: a lack of spiritual growth and understanding.

 

 

When finite man in his wisdom emanating from a fallen, depraved nature begins carrying out God’s orders in a manner contrary to His revealed will, results may be achieved, but they will never approach the heights which could have been attained by conforming to God’s Word.  A prolonged approach which ignores God’s way and follows man’s way will always lead into some form of apostasy.  And this is the revealed state of the Church as it will be at the end of the present [evil] age.

 

 

The Biblical illiteracy of Christians in Churches throughout the land is not only astounding, but it is also a sad commentary on how the ministries of pastor-teachers have been conducted over the past several decades.  They have been led away from fulfilling their true calling, i.e., teaching Christians “the whole will counsel’) of God” (Acts 20: 24-27):- “testifying to the gospel of God’s grace and also “preaching the kingdom  Satan spends his time blinding the minds of Christians relative to “the gospel of the glory of Christ” (2 Cor. 4: 3, 4), and the tares sown among the wheat are quite instrumental in doing his bidding.  The sons of the devil (tares) have been sown among the sons of the kingdom (wheat) with a view to their subverting “the message of the kingdom” (Matt. 13: 19).

 

 

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

 

 

1. A solemn warning is given concerning unwatchfulness.  The tares are sown under cover of darkness, “while everyone was sleeping” (v. 25).  Our Lord commands His disciples to “Watch” (Mark 13: 37).  Paul, writing to the Church in Rome, said, “And do this, understanding the present time.  The hour has come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed.  The night is nearly over; the DAY is almost here.  So let us put aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armour of light” (Rom. 13: 11, 12).

 

 

2. Reform movements on the part of Christians in the world are worthless.  It is an idle dream to think that we can improve conditions in the world by cleaning up the world, removing the tares, banishing immorality, etc. a comparable task would be to purify the waters of the Dead Sea.  Our Lord spent no time whatever in reform movements, and neither should the Christian.

 

 

The day is coming and is near at hand when the present existing conditions on this earth will be changed, but that day awaits the return of the Lord Jesus as King of Kings, and Lord of lords.  Even the waters of the Dead Sea will be purified in that DAY, and living waters will go out from Jerusalem.  Righteousness will be the order of the day.  But these things are revealed to take place only after the tares are separated from the wheat and gathered in bundles - never before

 

 

3. The doom of the tares is given in this parable.  The tares are to be “burned” (v. 30).  Christ interpreted every figure in the parable, but He did not interpret the fire. I wonder why?  [We will not go beyond what is written!]

 

 

4. Christ and His Apostles taught every man and warned every man concerning what lay out ahead.  They didn’t want a single individual to appear at the judgment-seat of Christ ignorant of these things.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

191

 

CAST OUTSIDE INTO THE

OUTER DARKNESS

 

 

BY ARLEN L. CHITWOOD

 

 

“And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness:

and there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matt. 25: 30).

 

 

-------

 

 

 

The nature of the treatment awaiting the unfaithful servant at the hands of his Lord in the parable of the talents has been completely misunderstood by numerous Christians, leading them to conclude that the Lord was dealing with an unsaved person at this point in the parable.  The Lord sharply rebuked the unfaithful servant, commanded that the talent be removed from his possession, and then commanded that he be cast into outer darkness.

 

 

The main problem which most Christians have with this part of the parable is the ultimate outcome of the Lord’s dealings with His unfaithful servant - the fact that he was cast into outer darkness.  “Outer darkness within their way of thinking, is to be equated with Hell (i.e, the final abode [after resurrection, (Rev. 20: 13, R.V.] of the unsaved in “the lake of fire”), and knowing that a Christian can not be cast into Hell - for “no condemnationa rendering of judgment against’]” can await the ones who are “in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 8: 1) - those equating “outer darkness” with Hell are left with no recourse other than to look upon the Lord’s dealings with the unfaithful servant and the Lord’s dealings with the unsaved as synonymous.

 

 

It probably goes without saying that had the Lord treated the unfaithful servant in a somewhat different fashion, very few Christians reading this passage would even think about questioning his salvation, for the response of the unfaithful servant would be perfectly in line with such verses as 1 Cor. 3: 13, 15 and present no indication of an unsaved condition.  But the Lord’s sharp rebuke, the removal of the talent from his possession and his being cast into outer darkness constitute what many view as a sequence of events which could not possibly befall a Christian.

 

 

Such an outlook on this passage though completely ignores the context, resulting in an interpretation which is not taught in the text at all.  And by forcing a non-contextual interpretation of this nature, one is left, after some fashion, with (1) an erroneous view of salvation by grace through faith, (2) an erroneous view of the purpose for the present dispensation, (3) an erroneous view of the coming judgment of Christians, and (4) an erroneous view of the perfect justice and righteousness of God.

 

 

Then, if introducing the preceding erroneous views in areas of Biblical doctrine through a forced, non-contextual interpretation is not enough in and of itself, it should also be noted that such an outlook on this passage also closes the door to the correct interpretation, the one which the Lord had in mind when He related this parable in the presence of His disciples.  Error will have fostered error and closed a door, leaving the student of Scripture, adhering to this erroneous system of thought, in a position where he cannot possibly understand aright the Lord’s present and future dealings  with His household servants.

 

 

A DARKNESS ON THE OUTSIDE

 

 

The expression “outer darkness” only appears three times in Scripture, and all three are found in Matthew’s gospel (8: 12; 22: 131 25: 30). Luke in his gospel alludes to outer darkness in a parallel reference to Matt. 8: 11, 12; Luke 13: 28, 29) but does not use the words.  He simply reduces the expression to “without” (ASV). ...

 

 

The place from which individuals are cast out is one of light.  This can possibly be illustrated best in Matthew, chapter twenty-two.  In this chapter, “outer darkness” is used to describe conditions in an area immediately outside the festivities attendant a royal wedding.  Such festivities in the East would normally be held at night inside a lighted courtyard or banqueting hall.  On the outside there would be a darkened courtyard, and the proximity of this darkened courtyard to the lighted banqueting hall would correspond perfectly to the expression, “the outer darkness” or “the darkness on the outside  A person cast therein would be cast out of the light into the darkness.  And it is the same in relation to [Messianic] Kingdom itself and positions of rulership therein as set forth in 8: 11, 12; 25: 14-30. ...

 

 

Following events of the judgment seat of Christ, servants having been shown faithful and servants having been show unfaithful will find themselves in two entirely different realms.  Servants having been shown faithful will find themselves being privileged to participate in activities surrounding the marriage supper of the Lamb and will subsequently be positioned on the throne as co-heirs with Christ.  Servants having been shown unfaithful though will not only be denied the privilege of attending the marriage festivities and participating in the subsequent reign of Christ but they will be consigned (a place outside the realm where these activities occur.  They will be “cast” on the outside, from the inner light to a place associated with events surrounding the marriage supper of the Lamb and the reign of Christ) into the outer darkness (a place separated from events surrounding the marriage supper of the Lamb and the reign of Christ).

 

 

This is the way “outer darkness” is used in Scripture; and this is the only way the expression is used.  Any teaching concerning “outer darkness remaining true to the text, must approach the subject only from a contextual fashion of this nature, recognizing the subject matter at hand.

 

 

CONTEXTUAL CONSIDERATIONS

 

 

Matthew presents God’s dealings with the house of Israel in relation to the kingdom of the heavens, with the house ultimately being left “desolate” because of the nation’s rejection (Matt. 23: 2, 13, 38); and Matthew also anticipates God’s dealings with a house separate and distinct from Israel in relation to the kingdom of the heavens (Matt. 16: 18, 19; 24: 40; 25: 30).  It is within this framework, along with individual contextual settings, that Christ’s three references to “outer darkness” are to be understood in Matthew’s gospel.

 

 

The first appearance of “outer darkness” in Matthew’s gospel is in Matt. 8: 11, 12, and the text and context both have to do with the message of the kingdom.  Jesus had just finished a lengthy discourse to His disciples, commonly called the “Sermon on the Mount” (chs. 5-7), which is a connected discourse dealing with entrance into or exclusion from the kingdom of the heavens.  Then in chapter eight the subject matter continues with the message concerning the kingdom, as the subject matter immediately prior to the Sermon on the Mount.  The message at this point actually picks up where chapter four left off - with physical healings. These physical healings appear before, in conjunction with, and after the text concerning the kingdom of the heavens and outer darkness in chapter eight.  These miraculous works of Christ among the Jewish people were signs having to do with the kingdom (cf. Isa. 35: 1ff., Matt. 4: 23-25; 10: 5-8; 11: 2-5).  They constituted the credentials of the messengers of the gospel of the kingdom.

 

 

It is within a contextual setting such as this that “outer darkness” first appears in Matthew’s gospel.  Actually, the subject arose after a Roman centurion expressed faith that Christ could heal his servant (who was sick at home) by just speaking the word.  Christ used the faith exhibited by this Gentile to illustrate a contrasting lack of faith exhibited by those in Israel.  Christ said that He had “not found so great faith, no, not in Israel” (v. 10).  He then spoke of a day when many would come “from the east and the west” and “sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of the heavens  That is, a separate and distinct group of individuals, taken mainly from the Gentiles, would exhibit faith on the same order as this centurion and enter into the heavenly [as well as the earthly (Acts 7: 4b, 5, R.V.)] sphere of the kingdom.  But those to whom this right naturally belonged, because of their lack of faith, would be excluded.  The “Sons of the kingdom” [those [who disqualified themselves] in Israel] would be “cast out” (vv. 11, 12).

 

 

The entire scene anticipated Matt. 21: 43 where the heavenly portion of the kingdom was taken from Israel in view of a separate and distinct group ultimately occupying that which did not naturally belong to them.  This group would be comprised of those who, at that time, were aliens, without hope, and without God.  But “in Christ Jesus” these conditions would change.  They would be “made nigh by the blood of Christ  Through being “in Christ” they would become “Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise” [the heavenly portion of the promise given to Abraham]. (Gal. 3: 17, 18, 29; Eph. 2: 12, 13; cf. Gen. 22: 17).

 

 

The second appearance of “outer darkness” in Matthew’s gospel is in the parable of the marriage festival in chapter twenty-two.  The contextual usage in this passage is in association with the kingdom of the heavens and the activities attendant a royal wedding.  Contextually, the “King” and His “Son” (v. 2) can only be identified as God the Father and God the Son.  The “servants” and “other servants” (vv. 3, 4) sent “to call them that were bidden” [Israel] refer to the ministries of the Old Testament prophets, John the Baptizer, the twelve, and the seventy (cf. Matt. 21: 33-36).  This offer, however, was spurned, and the messengers were ill-treated.  Then, last of all, God sent His Son, saying, “They will reverence my Son  Jesus, near the conclusion of His earthly ministry, rode into Jerusalem astride an ass presenting Himself as Israel’s King in fulfilment of the prophecy in Zech. 9: 9 (Matt. 21: 1-11).  But He too was rejected, culminating in His crucifixion and death (cf. Matt. 21: 37-39; 22: 1-6; 23: 1-36). ...

 

 

The parable of the Householder and His servant follows the parable of the fig tree and comments concerning the “days of Noah” and a house being “broken up   The main thoughts throughout this section (vv. 32-44) centre around the due season, watchfulness, and readiness for the Lord’s return.  Then in the parable of the Householder and His servant, the thought drawn from what has preceded centers around faithfulness in dispensing “meat in due season  If the servant remains faithful, he will be made ruler over all the Lord’s goods; but if the servant becomes unfaithful, he will be “cut asunder” and appointed “his portion with the hypocrites (Note that by comparing Matt. 24: 45-51 with the parallel section in Luke 12: 42-46 it is clear that only one servant is in view throughout.  The servant either remains faithful or becomes unfaithful.)

 

 

In the parable of the Householder and His servant, unfaithfulness resulted in an apportion with the hypocrites; in the parable of the ten virgins, the unfaithful servants (foolish virgins) were excluded from the marriage festivities; and in the parable of the talents, the unfaithful servant was cast into outer darkness.  Understanding the interrelationship between these parables, and comparing them with the parable of the marriage festival in chapter twenty-two, it becomes clear that “outer darkness” is associated with all three.  This is the place where the unfaithful servants found themselves in all of the parables, even though the expression is used only in the parable of the talents.  One parable describes the place, and all three describe conditions in this place.

 

 

Comparing the parable of the Householder and His servant with the parable of the talents, note that positions of rulership are in view in both parables.  Only the faithful will be apportioned these positions.  The unfaithful will not only be denied positions in the kingdom but will be apportioned their place “with the hypocrites” where there be “the weeping and the gnashing of teeth” [an Oriental expression of deep grief.] (Matt. 24: 51; 25: 30, ASV), called “outer darkness” in the latter parable.  Note the same expression in Matt. 22: 13 in connection with “outer darkness” (cf. also Matt. 8: 12).  Also note that the unfaithful among the ten virgins were excluded from the marriage festivities (25: 10-12), as the man without a wedding garment (who was bound and cast into “outer darkness”

 

 

HE WENT OUT

 

 

But Peter followed him afar off in the high priest’s palace … “Now Peter sat without in the palace: and a damsel came unto him, saying, ‘Thou also wast with Jesus of Galilee  But he denied before them all, saying, ‘I know not what thou sayest’ ... And again he denied with an oath, ‘I do not know the man’.  Then began he to curse and to swear, saying, ‘I know not the man  And immediately the cock crew.  And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said unto him, ‘Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice  And he went out and wept bitterly” (Matt. 26: 58, 69-75).

 

 

“And if a man also strive for masteries, yet is he not crowned, except he strive lawfully ... If we suffer patiently endure’], we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us” (2 Tim. 2: 5, 12).

 

 

Possibly the best illustration given in Scripture showing the downward path, which it is possible for a Christian to take, ultimately leading into the place of darkness outside the light, is the recorded actions of the Apostle Peter immediately preceding Christ’s crucifixion.  Christ had informed His disciples that they would all “be offended” during the next few hours because of Him; and from that time until the time Peter is seen weeping bitterly because of his offence, ...(The word “offended [Gk. skandalizo has to do with something causing opposition which can result in a fall.  This is the same word used in Matt 13: 21, which, according to Luke 8: 13, can result in a falling away, apostasy. ...

 

 

Step One: Peter would not accept Christ’s statement concerning what the disciples were about to do, as he had not previously accepted Christ’s statement on another occasion and had to be rebuked by the Lord (Matt. 16: 21-23).  Peter then made his boast that he would never allow opposition to bring about a falling away (cf. James 4: 13-15), and in response to Christ’s subsequent statement that he would deny Him three times that very night.  Peter responded, “Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee”; and the other disciples responded likewise.  But during the next few hours, “all the disciples” would forsake him and flee (Matt. 26: 33-35, 56).

 

 

Step Two: Following the disciples’ boast that they would never allow opposition to bring about a failing away or never deny Him, Christ took Peter, James, and John into the Garden of Gethsemane.  Once in the garden, He told them, “My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me  However, when Jesus went aside to pray, rather than watching, the disciples fell asleep.  The Lord then had to rebuke them for not watching and praying that they “enter not into temptation” (Matt. 26: 36-41).

 

 

Step three: Judas had betrayed Christ to the religious leaders of Israel; and he then led “a band of men and officers dispatched by the religious leaders, into the garden, to take Christ.  Seeing them, Peter drew his sword and resorted to the arm of flesh, to human means, to accomplish his previous boast.  The battle was to be spiritual, as it is to be today; but Peter tried to force his will on others through physical means (the day when Christ will take the sceptre and “strike through kings” was future then and remains future today [Psa. 110: 1ff, cf. Psa. 2: 1ff]).  Peter, in his vain, fleshly effort, cut off an ear of one of the high priest’s servants, but Jesus, completely rejecting his actions, told him to put up the sword, and He then healed the servant’s ear (Matt. 26: 47-55; Luke 22: 50, 51),

 

 

Step Four: The previous actions of Peter and the other disciples boasting of that which they would do (though the Lord had told them otherwise), sleeping when they should have been watching and praying. and Peter resorting to the arm of flesh as he sought to carry out his previous boast - led the disciples into doing exactly what they had previously stated would not occur.  When Jesus was taken by the multitude, “Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled” (Matt. 26: 56).

 

 

Step Five: Peter then began to follow Christ “afar off” (Matt. 26: 58).  He had taken the sword, and it was about to result in his ruin.  He had resorted to the man of flesh and was in the process of reaping what he had sown (cf. Matt. 26: 52; Gal. 6: 7, 8).  Because of his previous actions, the closeness which had been his in the inner circle with James and John was now gone (cf. Matt. 17: 1; 26: 37).

 

 

Step Six: When Jesus was taken into the high priest’s palace for questioning by the religious leaders, Peter, following Him “afar off remained outside in the courtyard.  Rather than himself with Christ on the inside, he sat down with the enemy on the outside (Matt. 26: 69; Luke 22: 54).

 

 

Step Seven: Peter’s past actions had now led him to the final point in his fall.  When accused of being one of Christ’s disciples, Peter denied his Lord on three separate occasions, followed by the cock crowing a second time just as Christ had foretold.  And the Lord, being led at that moment past Peter unto “the hall of judgment” (John 18: 28), turned and looked upon Peter, awakening him to the stark reality of what he had done (Matt. 26: 34, 69-74; Mark 14: 72; Luke 22: 61).

 

 

The Lord’s look in this passage was far more than a brief glance.  The word used in the Greek text (emblepo) points to Christ fixing His eyes upon Peter in an intently searching sense.  Peter came under scrutiny for his actions, causing him to remember that which had previously occurred.  Peter then “went out, and wept bitterly” (Luke 22: 62).

 

 

Peter, because of his past actions, found himself outside in the place where there is “Weeping and gnashing of teeth  He was in “outer darkness” (cf. Matt. 8: 12; 22: 13; 24: 51; 25: 30).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

192

 

 

THE ABODE OF THE HOLY DEAD

 

 

BY  D. M. PANTON

 

 

 

The statement will probably come as a great surprise to the vast majority of modern Christians, even including the bulk of prophetical students, that for the first five centuries after Christ the mediaeval and modern doctrine that dead saints are in heaven was unknown.  But such is the fact.  “The most ancient of all the Fathers says Dr. Pearson in his classic work on the Creed, “Were so far from believing that the end of Christ’s descent into Hades* was to translate the saints of old into heaven, that they thought them not to be in heaven yet, nor ever to be removed from that place until the general resurrection: very few (if any) for above five hundred years after Christ did believe that Christ delivered the saints out of Hades

 

* “It is (we hope) unnecessary to say that ‘Hades’ in the underworld and ‘the Lake of Fire’ are totally sundered localities.” - D. M. Panton.

 

 

While this antagonism of the first five centuries to the modern view is not by itself a sufficient disproof of the doctrine, it frees us at once from any obligation to defend it as a sacred deposit reaching us from the Apostles, and puts us instantly on our guard lest, in accepting it, we are accepting an error of the later ‘fathers  The denial of the modern belief of the first five centuries after Christ is a fact of the first magnitude.*

 

* That disembodied spirits, dead men, are now reigning in heaven is a Roman dogma, and a dogma required by the papal doctrine of the Intercession of the Saints with God on high. “The saints who reign together with Christ,” says the Decrees of the Council of Trent (Session XXV.), “offer up their prayers to God for men; and they think impiously who deny that the saints, who enjoy eternal happiness in heaven, are to be invoked.” So the Council of Florence:- “The spirits of believers are instantly received into heaven, and clearly behold the Triune God.”]

 

 

Now there is no question, our Lord Himself being our Instructor, that in His lifetime, as throughout all preceding ages, the saved dead were in Hades; for “all” - as Solomon had said (Eccles. 3: 20) - “go unto one place  It is obvious that the Hades to which his angelic escort carry Lazarus is not heaven, since within its confines is ‘this place of torment’ (Luke 16: 28).*  The two compartments of the abode of the dead our Lord unveils more clearly than has ever been done before or since: Sheol, and Abaddon (or Death); two places, so that our Lord says - “I hold the keys [in the plural] of Death and of Hades” (Rev. 1: 18); and, ultimately, Death and Hades, as outworn prisons, are cast into the “Lake of Fire” (Rev. 20: 14), which in its turn is named ‘Death,’ the eternal abode of the wicked.  Thus we are on sure ground in stating, on Christ’s authority, that within His lifetime all the saved dead were in Hades.  “No MAN He says, at least up to the moment He spoke the words, “HATH ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN” (John 3: 13).

 

* Here Hades is taken for the whole abode of the dead:  for Dives is said to have “lifted up his eyes in Hades”; so also Korah’s company went “down alive into Sheol” (Num. 16: 30).  But ‘Hades’ is sometimes confined to the holy compartment: e.g., Prov. 27: 20, Rev. 1: 18, etc.

 

 

Next, we find that our Lord Himself descended into Hades in His compassing all human experience.  Paul says: “He also descended into the lower parts of the earth” (Eph. 4: 10):* “who shall descend into THE ABYSS - that is, to bring Christ up from the dead (Rom. 10: 7).  So therefore Peter at Pentecost says:- “David saith concerning him, Thou wilt not leave my soul IN HADES: David spake of the resurrection of the Christ, that neither was he left in Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption” (Acts 2: 27, 31).  The Representative Man’s descent into Hades to fulfil all human experience proves that up to that moment the descent was all human experience still.

 

* “This many of the ancient fathers understood of the descent into Hades as placed in the lowest parts of the earth; and this exposition must be expressed so probable, that there can be no argument to disprove it.  ‘That the soul of Christ was in Hades says Augustine, ‘no Christian can deny’...” (J. Pearson, D.D.).

 

 

But this establishes a point crucial to the revelation of the intermediate state [of the disembodied souls of the dead, (Psa. 16: 10. cf. Acts 2: 27, R.V.)].  The Saviour said on the cross to the dying malefactor, - “This day shalt thou be with me IN PARADISE” (Luke 23: 43): the Paradise of which He speaks must therefore be a section of Hades, for into Hades He went immediately on dying: and this is put beyond all challenge or doubt by our Lord Himself saying to Mary in the garden, three days later, “I have not yet ascended unto the Father  He had been below, in the Paradise which is “in the heart of the earth” (Matt. 12: 40).  This Paradise therefore - Paradise without an epithet - cannot be the Paradise on high, which is described as “the Paradise of God” (Rev. 2: 7). Thus Paul’s words are illumined as with a lightning-flash.  Probing the heights above and the depths beneath, he says:- “I know a man caught away even to the third heaven; and I know such a man” - on another occasion and in another direction - “caught away into Paradise” (2 Cor. 12: 2*).  Our original Paradise, or Eden, does not appear to exist: our future Paradise the Saviour has gone to prepare (John 14.): our present Paradise is the intermediate home of God’s people of all dispensations between the Paradise that is gone (John 20: 17); that is, for three days and three nights and the Paradise to come.

 

* The Greek (carry off, ravish away) does not indicate any particular direction which only can be inferred from the known location of the spot to which the removal is made.  The English translators have inserted the word ‘up’, apparently on the assumption that the third heaven and Paradise are one and the same place; whereas it is obvious (from the studied repetition) that Paul’s seizures were separate experiences sampling antithetical localities.  The heaven in which are Enoch and Elijah, and possibly the saints of Matt. 27: 52, is doubtless this ‘third heaven’ - the third, apparently, from the Throne, that is, the nearest to the earth.

 

 

So therefore in our Lord’s lifetime, and in our Lord’s own experience, the holy dead are in Hades; and next, at a later stage, on the other side of the Ascension - and this is critical - we have once again the solid utterance of inspiration that the saved dead are in Hades still.  For speaking ten days after the Ascension, and so ten days after the current view supposes that our Lord had taken all the saved dead to heaven with Him, the Apostle says:- “David is not ascended into the heavens” (Acts 2: 34).  “His tomb Peter says - his unbroken tomb - “is with us a proof positive (argues the Apostle) of a spirit - [i.e., as a disembodied soul, - Ed.]  - unascended into heaven, unrisen ‘left in Hades’.  Therefore the conception that since the Ascension [of Christ] redeemed souls in dying wing their way up to the Throne of God is quite untrue.  Thus the comfort Jesus gives to John thirty to forty years after the Ascension, when the Apostle falls at His feet “as one dead is - “I hold the keys of Death and of Hades” (Rev. 1: 18), Hades thus being no more emptied than Abaddon, but both being now in the direct, personal custody and control of Christ.  For our Lord has “led captivity captive” (Eph. 4: 8) - He has enslaved the underworld, dying “that he might become Lord of both the dead and the living” (Rom. 14: 9); and the ‘captives’ that graced His train (if there were any) were the Powers of Darkness that sought to arrest the ascending Lord (Col. 2: 15).

 

 

Now therefore we are prepared for a word of Christ which covers the whole Church throughout the centuries until His return.  “Upon this rock,” He says, “I will build my church; and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it” (Matt. 16: 18) - shall not overpower, shall not master, the holy dead.  Thus towards the close of His ministry our Lord said: “I will build my church which was then, therefore, non-existent; and shortly after Pentecost we read - “great fear came upon the whole church” (Acts 5: 11), thus mentioned as existing for the first time:* therefore between these two dates - doubtless (as almost universally believed) at Pentecost, the Church was born. Now this is decisive.  For if our Saviour had emptied Paradise at His Ascension ten days before Pentecost, it could not have been the Church that was removed, for the Church was then non-existent; and it follows that either the Church has never been in Hades at all - which would exactly negative our Lord’s words - or else, if the saints are in heaven, a later emptying has taken place of which Scripture knows nothing.  The truth is obvious - the whole Church (with the slender exception of the living rapt at the close of the Age) experiences Hades down twenty centuries until, the moral fetters of sin having been broken, in due time the massive gates roll back to let forth the rising saints.

 

* The word ‘church’ is not in the Greek of Acts 2: 47.

 

 

A crucial fact finally crowns the evidence.  Ten centuries after the First Resurrection, and in the moment of the final muster of the dead for judgement, from both departments of the underworld ‑ and not from one only ‑ stream up the dual dead. “Death and Hades give up the dead which are in THEM” (Rev. 20: 13).  The dead issuing from Hades as distinct from Death, or Abaddon, cannot have died later than the First Resurrection, for no righteous die in the [coming Messianic and Millennial] Kingdom (Isa. 65: 20), and the unrighteous, dying, go to Abaddon.* Exactly in accord with our Lord’s words:- “All that are in the graves shall come forth: they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation” (John 5: 28).  Thus what the entire Church held for the first five centuries after Christ is the truth; namely, that HADES HOLDS ALL THE DEAD UNTIL RESURRECTION - the ‘FIRST’, and then the final - has done its work, when Death and Hades themselves - the old prison-houses now useless in a deathless eternity - “were cast” - literal localities, for ever ceremonially unclean - “into the lake of fire” (Rev. 20: 14).

 

* “The assumption that the souls issuing from Death and Hades embrace only such as incur the punishment of the Lake of Fire is based upon a false hypothesis that all believers rose from the dead at the beginning of the Millennial Kingdom” (Lange).

 

 

Scanty but precious light is cast on our intermediate home - when we shall be “at home with the Lord” (2 Cor. 5: 8).  “To me to live is Christ and to die is gain: to depart and be with Christ;* for it is very far better” (Phil. 1: 22): “far, far better, even than a life which ‘is Christ’” (Bishop Moule).  “Dying is hard once said an old saint, “but death is delightful  The revelation comes with great force, for Paul alone of mankind had been in Paradise.  Thus the worst that can happen to us, physically, only brings something inexpressibly superior: negatively, our greatest enemies are all outside Paradise - the world, the flesh, and the devil; and positively, there is a presence of Christ so comforting as to surpass anything known on earth.**

 

* Not necessarily where Christ is bodily.  It was a spiritual presence of Christ the dying malefactor experienced in Paradise: bodiless ourselves, our experience will be the same. “If I make my bed in Sheol [die], behold, thou art there” (Psa. 139: 8).  The fundamental fact, so constantly ignored, is that, until resurrection, the body is unredeemed (Rom. 8: 23); and for disembodied spirits [naked souls] to enter the Divine presence is for ceremonial uncleanness to enter the Holy of holies; for death, with the Curse clinging in disintegration, to enter the presence of Life.  In the Lord’s trenchant words: “GOD IS NOT THE GOD OF THE DEAD” (Matt. 22: 32).  By resurrection only can He prove Himself the God of a Patriarch now (Luke 16: 23) in Hades.

 

** “The falling into oblivion of the truth of Hades not only dislodged the doctrine of the millennium - for who would wish to descend from the supernal Glory even to a millennial earth, after (in some cases) thousands of years in the immediate presence of Deity? - but even more disastrously dislocated the truth of the resurrection, which, for spirits already in the full glory of God, becomes as fantastic as it is unnecessary.” (Govett.)]

 

 

-------

 

 

 

Mr. Robert Chapman, about the year 1896, sent out to leading teachers in the assemblies of Open Brethren, a series of Suggestive Questions. Number 10 includes the following: “Are not the redeemed in Revelation 4. and 5. the same with those of Chapter 20: 4, ‘Thrones and they say upon themVerse 5, ‘This is the first resurrection  Is it not a resurrection of first-fruits?”

 

“Now in the essential nature of the case of first-fruits,” writes Mr. G. H. Lang, ‘are but a portion of the whole harvest,’ and so the question proceeds: ‘And the rest of the dead in the same verse, do they not include all the family of God? not the wicked only.  Hence in verse 12, ‘Another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their worksVerse 15, ‘And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.’”

 

 

 

“It is clear,” says Mr. G. H. Lang, “that all who rise in the first resurrection do reign, from which it certainly follows that such as are not ‘accounted worthy’ to reign do not rise at that time *

 

[* Therefore, there must be a future judgment of our works in ‘Hades’ after death, (Heb. 9: 27, R.V.) - to reward those “which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that age” - [the millennium] “and the resurrection out of dead ones” (Luke 20: 35, lit. Greek). - Ed.]

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

193

 

“TO ATTAIN TO THE RESURRECTION OUT FROM THE DEAD”

IS THE CHRISTIAN’S HOPE (Phil 3: 11)

 

 

Edited from writings by

 

 

ROBERT GOVETT

 

 

-------

 

 

 

To the apostles the resurrection was the great foundation of the Christian faith.  It was proved by the actual resurrection of Jesus.  It was the great and startling piece of news which they were sent to proclaim, with all its consequences, to an unbelieving world.

 

 

But soon this truth fell out of view.  In the middle ages, the intermediate state and deliverance from it, usurped the place of resurrection.  At the Reformation the doctrine of the intermediate state fell through, together with the false doctrine of Purgatory.  The idea which Justin Martyr stigmatizes as false - that at once on death, the soul enters on heaven and glory - took its place.  If that be true, resurrection is an impertinence.  Hence resurrection almost ceased to form a subject of Protestant discourses, and the case is not very different now.

 

 

In most instances it is evidenced by the hymns usually sung - death is the object set before the believer’s view. The topic of funeral sermons is the victory achieved at death, when anyone departs in faith.  The departed faithful have entered the land of promise; may we go to them!  The body is a ‘clog,’ a ‘burden,’ a ‘prison Death is emancipation from the flesh, a sudden entry on glory.  This, I suppose, is not Scripture doctrine, but contrary to it.

 

 

To unbelievers, resurrection has always been one of the chief stumbling-blocks of Christianity.  1. Of old it was declared, that the rising of the dead and decomposed body was a something beyond the power of God Himself.  2. The philosophers added, that even if it were possible, it was undesirable in the highest degree. Matter was in itself evil.  To be delivered from the appetites and importunities of the body was the great object of the philosopher.  And should he allow, that the body that had wrought so much mischief to the soul, and was at length laid away out of sight - a putrid mass - was anew and forever to be associated with the purified spirit?  It was man’s glory to leave it for evermore.

 

 

Celsus said of resurrection, that it was ‘a hope to be cherished by worms

 

 

This erroneous view will materially affect our comprehension of the Saviour’s reply to the Sadducees.  Jesus argues from the expression  used by Jehovah, “I am the God of Abraham, of Isaac and Jacob that the dead were to be raised.  In what condition then, did Jesus assume these patriarchs to be?  Dead? Or alive? Christians ordinarily suppose that He assumes them to be alive.  So says Wesley, “Therefore Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, are not dead, but living.  Therefore the soul does not die with the body.” So says Barnes.  “God spake, then, as being their God “They must, therefore, be still somewhere living  “He is the God only of those who have an existence

 

 

But then there is in that passage no proof of a resurrection; but only of the separate existence of the soul, after the body is laid aside.  Now resurrection never means ‘the immortality of the soul never means ‘a future state Then, too, Jesus’ reply does not refute the Sadducees.  Their alleged difficulty did not relate to the intermediate state, but to the coming forth of the dead from their tombs, and the restoration of their bodies.  To whom the woman was as wife to belong, was a question applying only to the day when the body was reunited to the soul.  Neither Pharisee nor Sadducee believed in marriage among spirits.

 

 

This answer, then, makes Jesus evade the question, and prove the separate existence of the soul, instead of the resurrection of the body.  It is, in fact, a wrong way of stating the matter.  The patriarchs were not alive, but dead.  The dead, are those human beings whose body and soul are severed.  Then Jesus admits to the Sadducees, that Abraham is dead, as much as the woman and her seven husbands.  Abraham is dead for his body is still in the cave of Machpelah.  And Jesus cites the expression in Exodus as a proof of the future resurrection of the dead: Matthew 22: 30. “Now in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage  “Now concerning the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken to you by God, saying ‘I am the God of Abraham’.”

 

 

It is, indeed, quite true that this passage proves the separate existence of the souls of the patriarchs.  But that was not the point.  Jesus does not cite it to prove that, but Abraham’s return to his body.  The separate existence of Abraham’s body and soul is a proof of his being then and now among the dead [in Hades].  He will not be alive till his body and soul are reunited.  In the same state in which Abraham was when God spoke to Moses at the bush, Abraham is still.  Barnes and others call him “dead” then.  He is, then, dead now.  Jesus therefore is referring, not to time present, but to the future day of resurrection, of which the Sadducees were speaking.

 

 

Abraham is dead.  Jehovah is his God.  But Jehovah is not God of the dead.  Therefore God is not now showing Himself the God of Abraham, for the resurrection [of the holy dead] is not yet come.  That the resurrection was to be at a future day, the Pharisees held; and on that, allowed as a basis, the Sadducees plead. God, then, by these words, engages to restore by His Almighty power Abraham to become Abraham again in resurrection.  Abraham when the Lord promised him the possession of Canaan, was the man, consisting of [his animating spirit] body and soul.  The curse of sin, separating the parts of Abraham, has hitherto prevented him from enjoying the good [land-inheritance which God]* promised.  God must therefore raise the body of Abraham from the cave, and re-knit it to the soul of Abraham, ere he can fulfil His engagement.  Till the body and soul come together, Abraham is not alive, and God is not showing Himself the God of Abraham.  There is no visible difference between Abraham and Saul now.  But the Almighty means to show His power put forth in goodness in rescuing Abraham wholly from the grasp of death.  He has as yet done nothing answering the greatness of His promises for the patriarchs.  But He is a God of truth.  Therefore what He has not done in the past, He must, He will do in the future.  And God is in covenant relation with Abraham, even as regards his body.  That was marked for God.  How can God reject it, or cast it away as naught?  Mark, too, the terms, “My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant Genesis 17: 13.  Then the flesh must be as everlasting as the covenant.  And so it is in the only One to whom it has been fulfilled.   It is true in the One Heir, the Singular Seed of Abraham risen [out] from the dead, who said, “A spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see I have  For this resurrection [of reward] the patriarchs wait.

 

[* See Gen. 13: 14-17; 15: 7. cf. Acts 7: 5, R.V.)]

 

 

A new and better “age”* is coming, in which they neither die nor marry, nor are given in marriage.

 

[* See Luke 20: 35. cf. Heb. 6: 5, R.V.]

 

 

As long, then, as marriage and death last among believers, so long have we clear proof that the better age and this [select and out-] resurrection from the dead are not come.*

 

[* See Phil. 3: 11. cf. Heb. 11: 35b, R.V.]

 

 

But if ‘death be resurrection and the spirit-state be the eternal one, Abraham had already risen ages before, and was either then enjoying the land of promise, or God’s pledged word was broken.  Then, too, the Sadducees should not have said, “Whose wife in the resurrection shall she be For already in the spirit-state she was the wife of one or more of them.  If they were wrong in their supposition about this, Jesus would have corrected their error.  But while He affirms the reality of resurrection, which they falsely denied, He confirms them in regard to the futurity of the resurrection.  “But when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage (Greek) Luke 20: 34, 35.

 

 

This then is God’s meaning, where Scripture uses the word “resurrection  Death is not a rising up but a lying down of the body, in which posture it abides.  Death is not the mounting up of the soul, but its going down into the under world of ‘Hades’.  On this example of Christ Paul rests the whole Gospel.  This alone is God’s news.  The departure of the soul from the body at death was, and is, the ordinary course of things.  God raised Jesus not from death alone, but from among the dead, to whom He descended when He died; and from whom He came up, when He returned to life.  How was the Saviour known to be dead?  By the aspect and touch of His body.  How was He known to be buried?  By His friends bearing His body to the place of dead bodies.  How was He proved to be risen?  By His body being no longer to be found in the tomb to which He was committed, but by its being seen and felt alive by credible witnesses.  The whole man had risen.  His [spirit (Jas. 2: 26, R.V.) and] soul [were reunited and] dwelt anew in His body.  He was the same “Son of Man” after His death that He was before it.  As His Father at His baptism, and transfiguration saluted Him as His “Son so does He after His birth from the tomb. “Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee Acts 13: 33.  Raised from the dead, He is still the Son of David, and is to return as such: 2 Timothy 2: 8; Revelation 22: 16.  As He rose, so after this manner are we to rise.

 

 

AN ILLUSTRATION

 

 

Shall I refer to that illustration of the future existence which has always struck men? when they made the butterfly an emblem of resurrection?  Observe, then, it is not a resurrection at the time of death which is therein set forth: (Davis p. 11)

 

 

The grub comes forth from the egg of the caterpillar, to feed on leaves.  When it has attained its full size, and finished its earthly life, it prepares its coffin, and rolls itself up in its winter cerements.  But when the spring opens into summer, it comes forth from its buried existence to live its new and ethereal life.  All the winter it remains in suspended animation; its new life is entered on by bursting forth of its coffin to enjoy its airy heritage and pasture.  So with man.  Death is his entry on the state of the chrysalis.  It is not till he has burst the tomb that he comes forth to his heavenly heritage and life.

 

 

The doctrine, then, of the Old Testament and the New is that at death the soul goes to the place which is called Hades.

 

 

“Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation John 5: 28, 29.

 

 

That this is no mere word of theory, devoid of reality and power, God has given us proof in the coming forth of Lazarus from the cave of death; and in the opened graves, out of which the companions of Jesus’ resurrection came, and exhibited themselves as alive in soul and body.  Still more satisfactorily.  Jesus has come forth in body, soul, and spirit, as the risen man, the pattern and the proof of ours.

 

 

If the disembodied soul’s distant vision of the Lord be glad, how much greater shall be the joy of the presence of the risen beside the Risen Son of Man!  It is not the death of the believer that gives him the victory.  It is when the mortal has been clothed upon with immortality, and the corruptible with incorruption, that then shall the saying be brought to pass, “Death is swallowed up in victory!  O Death, where is thy sting?  O Hades, where is thy victory  This is the cry of the rescued, as for ever they leave the soul’s place of custody, and the elements of the tomb.

 

 

The Lord speed that day!

 

 

To the Spiritists [who believe death is resurrection] the resurrection is “past already” as it regards the dead, who are far the largest portion of the human family.  But the Holy Spirit tells us, that such a statement is an overthrow of the faith: 2 Timothy 2: 18.  You have destroyed the very sense of resurrection.  Resurrection is an act of God the Son, (1 Corinthians 15: 22) not experienced now, but to be put forth at the last day, at a time unknown; but, then, signalled by the trump of God.  Jesus is “Resurrection and Life  On the living He will work the change which shall make them immortal.  On the dead saints - [when He returns (1 Thess. 4: 16. cf. John 14: 3, R.V.)] - He will put forth His power in resurrection.

 

 

The error here combated sets aside both sin and redemption.  According to Scripture, death, and the decomposition of the body which follows it, were the effects of Adam’s trespass.  Life and the recomposition of the body is the consequence of Jesus’ work of obedience and atoning.  But the Spiritists’ make death to be resurrection, and the penalty of sin to be our deliverance!

 

 

But resurrection has been foretold by God in His grace.  Death, the penalty of sin, is not to be the end of man. Resurrection is possible, for He who promises has Almighty power.  It will be no harder to Him to reunite the separated parts of man, than it was to mould him at first.  Resurrection is certain, for He has determined on it, and His truth binds Him to perform it.  Nay, He has already effected this His counsel, in the case of His Son Christ Jesus.

 

 

The time of resurrection, as stated by the apostle, is quite different from that contemplated by the Spiritist theory.  The righteous are to rise before the wicked in a future day.  The dead saints have to rise in order to set them on a level with the living saints, who are expecting Christ’s return.  The resurrection is to take place on large numbers at once, not on men one by one.  Their mouldering relics are to be restored to life in an instant - at the last day, at the last trump - the worthy signal of the Great Congregation assembly.  Such a change is absolutely necessary; for, as Paul says, believers, whether they be alive or dead, are in neither condition fitted for the kingdom of glory: 15: 50.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

194

 

HADES REVERSES ALL

 

 

BY G. H. LANG

 

 

 

Hades is a known, locality.  It is mentioned in other passages in the New Testament: Matt. 11: 23; 16: 18; Luke 10: 15; Acts 2: 27, 31; Rev. 1: 18; 6: 8; 20: 13, 14.  It is the place to which our Lord went at death: “Because you will not abandon me” [Gk. ‘My soul’] “to the grave” [Gk. ‘to hades’] (Acts 2: 27).  Hades and the grave are not synonymous; the former is in “the heart of the earth and is the place of disembodied souls; the latter is the burial place of their bodies.  According to scripture, the soul is the person; the body, is the ‘tent’ or ‘tabernacle’ in which the soul resides when alive.  There it is the Greek rendering of the Hebrew word “Sheol” as used in Psalm 16: 10: “Because you will not abandon me to the grave” [Gk. “Sheol”] “nor will you let your Holy One see decay  This word comes some sixty-five times in the Old Testament, from which passages much can be learned.  Its location is shown.  Ephesians 4: 9 tells us that it was from, “the lower earthly regions” that Christ ascended by resurrection.  It includes the “Paradise” to which the Lord and the repentant thief went at death [Luke 23: 43]:- “I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise  A current pictorial description was adopted by Christ; it was known as “Abraham’s side” [Gk. ‘bosom’].  To lie in another’s bosom pictured restful, honoured intercourse: “Leaning back against Jesus, he asked him, ‘Lord, who is it?’” (John 13: 23).

 

 

2. Hades is a dual region, a place of “agony” as well as of bliss, and the two regions are separated by a “chasm” that is impassable.  After death the soul is restricted (to some extent) in movement, as well as the body.  It has its Divinely imposed limits.  Yet its faculties persist: “He looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side” (v. 23).  His tongue can cry put, his ears can hear, his memory is active (“Son, remember”), his feelings are acute.  He is the same person, simply disembodied.

 

 

3. As shown above, the rich man in that region and condition has eyes, ears, tongue, and sensations.  Similarly, when Samuel was permitted to return (from ‘Sheol’) to warn Saul, his robe and appearance, as described by the medium, were readily recognizable by Saul, and the prophet could speak words audible to the king and hear what the latter said:- “Then the woman asked, ‘Whom shall I bring up for you  ‘Bring up Samuelhe said. When the woman saw Samuel, she cried out at the top of her voice. ... ‘What does he look likehe asked.  ‘An old man wearing a robe is coming up’, she said.  Then Saul knew it was Samuel ... Samuel said to Saul, ‘Why have you disturbed me by bring me up?’” [1 Samuel 28.]

 

 

Thus in that dread place there is a “fire”; its victim is “in torment”; Lazarus has a “finger and there is “water” that could alleviate the torment, were this permitted, but (in the rich man’s case) it is not.  The terms are strong: basanos, torture, anguish; odunao, agony as of child pangs.

 

 

However fiercely the modern sinner may resent: and reject such conceptions they are neither unphilosophical nor were they new when the Lord spoke of them.  The soul after death being still an entity goes to Hades, and not into heaven as so many Christians erroneously suppose; and being conscious must be susceptible of sensations appropriate to its condition and surroundings.

 

 

4. Though co-operation between the two regions within Hades is denied, intercourse is not.  The rich man (Dives) and Abraham can converse.  The former makes two appeals: (a) For Personal alleviation.  But this is declared impossible.  Lazarus cannot reach Dives.  This denies the basic allegation of spiritism that the pious of the higher realms of that world live to help forward and upward the less fortunate, and that existence there is a progressive ascent.  Dives entertained no such fallacy.  He does, not ask for a release, for transference to Abraham’s side, but only for temporary mitigation of his misery.

 

 

(b) He then pleads that his five brothers be warned, “so that they will not also come to this place of torment” (verse 28).  It has been suggested that this request arose only lest his own wretchedness be aggravated by their company and reproachers.  The narrative does not suggest this, and a basic motive ought not to be imputed. The love that thinks no evil would rather hope that genuine pity stirred the once hard heart and he who would not himself escape desired that others should do so. 

 

 

Abraham replies to each request.

 

 

(c) Dives must remember the relationship between the past and the present.  In his life on earth he received in full his good things.  He gained what he sought and misused it.  He lived for the approbation of men, “and men praise you when you prosper  Thus “while he lived he counted himself blessed” (Psalm 49: 18); he received his good things, and he exhausted them.  Now he has nothing, not even, a friend to welcome him into that tabernacle of misery.  It was with him as it is to be with that richer and more majestic being than he, Who is yet to reach that dread region, at whom those already there shall be astonished and shall have no words of grateful welcome (Isaiah 14: 3-15).

 

 

In like manner Lazarus on earth had endured and suffered much evil; “but now he is comforted here and you are in agony” (verse 25).  Up to the time of death one condition; after the time of death an entirely reversed condition.

 

 

(d) As to his brothers, they must use their existing opportunities and advantages.  More they do not need, nor will more be granted.  “They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them  The Spirit of truth speaks in them; the voice of a spook cannot be so impressive or authoritative: “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead” (verse 31).

 

 

In due time One who is the greatest of the sons of men rose from the dead, but in conformity with the principle He had there stated, He did not in that form present Himself to men of the world, but continues to speak by His convicting Spirit in the Scriptures.  Jesus warned against the love of money (Matt. 6: 24; 13: 22; Luke 16: 13); the later apostles and prophets have continued and emphasized the warning (1 Tim. 6: 10): therefore how much heavier is the guilt, and how much darker the prospects, of those who now turn away, not only from Moses and the Prophets, but from Him Who by His Spirit warns us from heaven.

 

 

This solemn warning is addressed to the regenerate, and not only to those who have never professed the faith.  For “people who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction.  For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil.  Some people eager for money have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs

 

 

A Christian, as yet trustful toward God and tender towards men, may become self-dependent and callous.  “So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall (1 Cor. 10: 12); for if we fall into the temptation and snare of loving money we must ‘reap’ the full harvest of our sowing as certainly as must the open worldling.

 

 

It is on [regenerate] Christians that this certainly is pressed, in order that we may not be weary in communicating of our substance, in doing well, by working that which is good toward all.  “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked.  A man reaps what he sows.  The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction: the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal* life.  “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up” (Gal. 6; 7-9).  A Dives may be a regenerate believer, Scripture and fact assert it.  Who dare deny it?  Christ had already applied to His own followers His exhortation, “Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed: a man’s life (soul) does not consist in the abundance of his possessions” (Luke 12: 15, with verse 22 “therefore”).

 

[* Note: The Greek adjective ‘aionios’ is here translated “eternal”; but this Greek word should be translated ‘age-lasting’ in various the contexts, and this is one of the many!  For other examples, in the Epistles, see Gal. 6: 8; 1 Tim. 6: 12; Heb. 5: 9; Titus 1: 3; 3: 7. “These passages have to do with running the present race of the faith with a view of one day realizing an inheritance in the [coming millennial] kingdom, which is the hope set before Christians” (A. L. Chitwood.)]

 

 

5. The state of death, and the place called ‘Hades’ are not the ‘lake of fire’, for ultimately the two former are to be cast into the latter (Rev. 20: 13, 14).  The scene described is immediately after death, for the five brothers are still alive in the family home on earth.  Incidentally, that their number is given implies the literality of the circumstances.  Therefore Hades is not eternal; and the eternal destiny of its inmates ought not to be assumed. There will be eternal death and eternal torment (Matt. 25: 41, 46; Rev. 14: 9-11; 20: 10, 14, 15), but what persons are to suffer that doom cannot be declared save by the Righteous Judge alone (Matt. 25: 41), and so to the more part of the lost it appears that He will not declare it until the last judgment at the great white throne.  It is not warranted to preach eternal destiny from what Scripture here says of Hades.  Dives may be an utterly lost soul, but no one can rightly assert this.  If his concern for his brothers was sincere, he was not yet utterly hardened.  Nor does he make complaint as to his sufferings, like those who blaspheme God because of their pains (Rev. 16: 9, 11).  And Abraham acknowledges relationship with Dives by answering his appeal “Father” with the term “Son” [Gk. ‘child’].

 

 

6. The Lord leaves untouched, some deep and interesting matters.  What constituted the fitness of Lazarus for Paradise?  He is not said to have been godly; and if he was so, why was he reduced to such poverty and misery?  It is not said that the rich man was irreligious and impious, but only that he was callous.  Does this alone assure so severe a punishment?  The Speaker left His hearers to solve such problems by the Scriptures, as can be done.  He was too skilful a teacher to weaken the appeal and warning by diverting the minds of hearers to but subordinate topics.  Rather, would He force upon them the one solemn lesson that life here determines experience there; that immediately after death conditions are drastically reversed, a just balance is reached, and present inequalities are redressed.  There all can see what faith asserts here.

 

 

Various common assumptions are here rebuked.  That death introduces a complete break in moral state and~ experience is refuted.  On the contrary, moral condition persists and governs experience.  The law of sowing and reaping operates rigidly and fully.  Eternal consequences have indeed been cancelled for the repentant by the sufferings of Christ on the cross; but temporal consequences prevail in the period between death and resurrection.

 

 

It is also denied that at death the saved go to heaven and the lost to hell.  They all alike go to the realm of the dead, where Christ went, but some to the portion called of old, “Abraham’s bosom” and now given the nobler description “with Christ” (Phil. 1: 23), for now He fills, or occupies, all things (Eph. 4: 9, 10).

 

 

When the A.V. was made, “hell” meant what the Greek “Hades” means, a vast covered region out of ken of our bodily senses, reached after death.  To-day “hell” has come to mean the place of final judgment, the “lake of fire,” which misleads the present reader of the Authorized King James Version.

 

 

A result has been that the great [scriptural] facts revealed as to the state intermediate between death and resurrection have, been deleted from most Christian thought and preaching, so that both the solace and the solemnity of such knowledge have been lost. Believers have been buoyed up with the fictitious notion that they go from their death-bed to the glory of heaven, and the salutary warning has been lost that their unrepented misdeeds must be faced directly after death.  In particular, how lamentable has been the growth in [regenerate] Christians of covetousness, riches, and self-indulgence.  Let us rather take to our hearts the facts presented by our Lord and order our ways accordingly.  Then shall we be able honestly and forcefully to press them upon the carnal.

 

 

The Invigorating inspiring effort of this view is shown in IV Maccabees 13: 16.  As mentioned before, in the second century B.C., pious Jews being cruelly tortured to death by Antiochus Epiphanes, encouraged one another to endure unto the end by the words, “Thus suffering, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will welcome us and all the fathers will commend us  In this wise they rejoiced at the prospect of being welcomed into the eternal tabernacles.

 

 

O GOD, TO US MAY GRACE BE GIVEN

TO FOLLOW IN THEIR TRAIN.

 

 

-------

 

 

 

“HADES occurs 11 times in the Greek Testament, and is improperly translated in the common version 10 times by the word hell.  It is the word used in the Septuagint as a translation of the Hebrew word sheol, denoting the abode or world of the dead, and means literally that which is in darkness, hidden, invisible, or obscure.  As the word hades did not come to the Hebrews from any classical source, or with any classical meaning, but through the Septuagint, as a translation of their own word sheol, therefore in order to properly define its meaning recourse must be had to the various passages where it is found.  The Hebrew word sheol is translated by hades, in the Septuagint, 60 times out of 63; and though sheol in many places, (such as Gen. 35: 35; 13: 38; 1 Sam. 2: 7; 1 Kings 2: 6; Job. 14: 13; 17: 13, 16, &c.), may signify keber, the grave, as the common receptacle of the dead [body], yet it has the more general meaning of death; a state of death; the dominion of death.  To translate hades by the word hell, as is done 10 times out of 11 in the New Testament [A.V.], is very improper, unless it has the Saxon meaning of helan, to cover, attached to it.  The primitive signification of hell only denoting what was SECRET or CONCEALED, perfectly corresponds to the Greek sheol, but the theological definition to it at the present day by no means expresses it.”

 

- Taken from The Emphatic Diaglott. p.p. 892.

 

 

-------

 

 

“The passion  for souls; the compassion of the Lord Jesus, burning in the hearts and lives are present day evidence that Christ loves.  A whole Bible for a whole world, with its searching implications, calls us to a renewed consecration to Him Who loved us with an undying love.  The time is short; the coming of the Lord to estanlish His Millennial Kingdom draweth nign.

 

 

Can we, whose souls are lighted

With the wisdom from on high,

Can we, to men benighted

The Lamp of life deny?

Kark! Those cursts of accamalation;

Kark! Those loud triumphant chords;

Jesus takes the highest station,

Crown Him, Crown Him

King of kings, and Lord of lords.”

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

195

 

APPROVAL, GOAL OF YOUR FAITH

 

 

BY  ARLEN  L  CHITWOOD

 

 

-------

 

 

[THE FOLLOWING IS A BRIEF FOREWORD FROM A PREVIOUS PAGE - Ed.]

 

The key words in Heb. 3: 6 pertaining to hope are “confidence” and “rejoicing  The Greek word translated “confidence” (parresia) has to do with being “bold,” or “courageous”; and the Greek word translated “rejoicing” (kauchema) has to do with “the object of boasting,” “a thing of pride  Christians are to be bold, courageous as they journey toward their heavenly [and millennial] inheritance; and they are to exult in the hope set before them.  They are to display this hope as the very object of the salvation which they possess in such a manner that the One Who secured this hope for them will receive the praise, honour, and glory.

 

A FUTURE INHERITANCE

 

The future inheritance of the saints (1 Peter 1: 4), mentioned numerous times in Scripture, must be understood from the standpoint of the inheritance surrounding the birthright, having to do with firstborn sons.  The word translated “birthright” in the New Testament is from the Greek word prototokia, a plural noun which should be properly rendered, “the rights of the firstborn  And the rights of firstborn sons consists of a plurality of rights, which are inherited rights.

 

The rights of firstborn sons in the Jewish economy in the Old Testament consisted of three things: (1) ruler of the household under and for the father, (2) priest of the family, and (3) the reception of a double portion of the father’s estate.  Every Jewish firstborn son was in line to receive this twofold inheritance; but, according to that which God has revealed in His Word, this inheritance was forfeitable.  The positional standing as a firstborn son did not itself guarantee that the inheritance would be received.  A firstborn son, through rebellious actions, could forfeit the rights of primogeniture.

 

Two classic examples of the forfeiture of the rights belonging to firstborn sons are given in the Book of Genesis, the book wherein the roots of all Biblical doctrine lie.  One is the account of Esau, and the other is the account of Reuben. …

 

 

-------

 

 

 

That the trialapproval’] of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with firebut being approved through fire’], might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:

 

 

Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory:

 

 

Receiving the endgoal’] of your faith, even the salvation of your souls (1 Peter 1: 7-9).

 

 

In the Greek text of verse seven the word translated “trial” is dokimion, and the word translated “tried” is dokimazo.  These are, respectively, noun and verb forms of the same word.  In either form, this word means to be “tried with a view to approval, if found worthy”; or, if the text so indicates, the word can refer to “approval” itself at the termination of testing.

 

 

James 1: 3, where dokimion is used, provides a good example of testing during present time with a view to future approval.  But 1 Peter 1: 7, contextually, moves beyond the point of a present-day testing.  Approval at a future date is in view, and the translation of both dokimion and dokimazo should reflect this fact.  This verse should correctly be translated,

 

 

“That the ‘approval’ of your faith ... but being ‘approved’ through fire...”

 

 

Verse nine, continuing this same thought, refers to obtaining something because of the outcome of one’s faith - “Receiving the end of your faith...”  The word translated “end” is telos in the Greek text, which literally means “goal” “consummation,” “full development” of that which is in view.  “Faith the subject matter at hand in verses seven through nine, is that which is in view.  In verse seven, “faith” must be approved in order to realize “praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ”, and in verse nine, “faith” must be brought to full development, reach its goal, in order to realize “the salvation of your souls

 

 

AT THE JUDGMENT SEAT

 

 

The approval and goal of one’s “faith” await the coming issues of the judgment seat of Christ.  The evaluations and determinations of this judgment will be based on “works” which emanate out of faithfulness to one’s calling.  The Book of James teaches that faithfulness to one’s calling will result in works of a particular nature, and these works alone (works which God has outlined for each individual Christian to accomplish) will result in faith being brought to the place where it can be approved, realizing its proper goal (ref. Chapter V).

 

 

The trial of “every man’s work” in fire at the judgment seat of Christ will be with a view to approval, if found worthy.  The Greek word translated “try” in 1 Cor. 3: 13 is dokimazo, the same word used In 1 Peter 1: 7. “Works” are approved through fire in 1 Cor. 3: 13, and “faith” is approved through fire in 1 Peter 1: 7.  Both Scriptures refer to that future time when the approval of works at the judgment seat will reveal an approved faith as well.

 

 

“Works” of a nature which can be approved will have emanated out of faithfulness to one’s calling, resulting in “a faith” which can also be approved.  During the present time, faith is being brought to its goal (into the place where it can be approved) through works; and at the judgment seat, the approval of faith will be based upon the approval of works.  The former cannot be realized apart from the latter, and the relationship between faith and works after this fashion is such that Scripture reveals both being approved “through fire

 

 

However, there is another side to the judgment seat of Christ, for Scripture reveals that a Christian’s works may be found unworthy of approval.  The “trial” will be with a view to approval, but such will not be the case if the fire reveals works which are not worthy of approval - works emanating from other than a faithfulness to one’s calling.

 

 

And disapproved “works” can only result in a disapproved “faith  A faith of this nature will not have been brought to its proper goal, and individuals possessing works unworthy of approval will “suffer loss

 

 

Then, using the inverse of that which is taught in 1 Peter 1: 7-9 about approved faith brought to its goal (shown through approved works), an individual possessing a disapproved faith (shown through disapproved works) will not only be denied “praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ” (v. 7), but his suffering loss will have to do with the loss of his soul (v. 9).

 

 

James 1: 12 refers to Christians being “approved” prior to receiving a crown:

 

 

“Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is triedapproved’], he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him

 

 

The word translated “tried” is dokimos in the Greek text.  This word, from the same root form as dokimios in 1 Peter 1: 7, refers specifically to being “approved at the end of testing  In 1 Cor. 3: 13, it is the approval of an individual’s “works”; in 1 Peter 1: 7, it is the approval of an individual’s “faith”; but in James 1: 12, it is the approval of the individual “himself

 

 

The approval of works, as has been shown, will result in and reveal the approval of faith.  This will, in turn, result in the approval of the individual, for it is a physical flesh and bone entity who will realize the goal of his “faith the salvation of his soul.

 

 

In 1 Cor. 9: 24-27 Paul states that the Christian is in a race with a crown in view, which will be acquired only after the runner has been approved at the conclusion of the race:

 

 

“Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize?  So run, that ye may obtain [the prize].”

 

 

SALVATION OF THE SOUL

 

 

And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things.  Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown, but we an incorruptible (crown).

 

 

I therefore so run, not as uncertainly: so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:

 

 

But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway [lit. ‘be disapproved’].”

 

 

The word translated “castaway” (v. 27) is adokimos in the Greek text.  This is the same word translated “tried [lit. ‘approved’]” in James 1: 12, but with the prefix “a,” which negates the word.  Adokimos, thus, means “disapproved

 

 

Studying 1 Cor. 9: 24-27; James 1: 12; 1 Peter 1: 7-9 in the light of one another will produce one clear, uniform teaching: Christians are enrolled in a race, with crowns to be won or lost at the termination of this race.  And how well Christians run the race depends upon their “faithfulness  Faithfulness to one’s calling is the key, for only through faithfulness can works ensue; and works are necessary to produce a “living” faith, resulting in fruit-bearing, which can, in that coming day (at the judgment seat), be approved (cf. James 2: 14-26).

 

 

Only in this manner will individuals be approved for crowns, allowing the recipients of crowns the privilege of occupying positions as joint-heirs with Christ in His coming kingdom.

 

 

THE PRIMARY, FUNDAMENTAL TYPE

 

 

A Christian’s disapproval for the crown referred to in 1 Cor. 9: 24-27 has its contextual parallel in the verses immediately following (1 Cor. 10: 1-11), which record Israel’s disapproval for entrance into the land of Canaan.  These eleven verses reiterate certain experiences of the Israelites under Moses following the death of the paschal lambs in Egypt, Israel’s experiences (within the scope of the type) begin in Egypt, move through the Red Sea passage, and terminate in the wilderness wanderings.

 

 

The verses outlining these experiences are divided into two sections (vv. 1-6 and vv. 7-11). The first section outlines in general terms the experiences of the Israelites under Moses, and this section is concluded in verse six with the statement:

 

 

“Now these things were our examples [lit. ‘these things happened as types for us’], to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted

 

 

Then, the second section outlines in more specific terms four sins of the people which characterized the wilderness journey, and this section is concluded in verse eleven with the statement:

 

 

“Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples [lit. ‘for types’]: and they are written for our admonition upon whom the ends of the worldages’] are come

 

 

Thus, there is a type-antitype treatment of Israelites under the leadership of Moses with Christians under the leadership of Christ.  This same type-antitype treatment of Israelites with Christians also forms the basis for the first four of the five major warnings in the Book of Hebrews (1: 14 - 2: 5; 3: 1 - 4: 16; 6: 1-12; 10: 19-39), apart from which these warnings cannot be properly understood.

 

 

Just as a proper understanding of the first four of the five major warnings in Hebrews is built around a type-antitype treatment of the Israelites under Moses with Christians under Christ, a proper understanding of 1 Cor. 9: 24-27 is built around this same type-antitype treatment.  These verses logically lead into the tenth chapter, and this chapter forms the basis for explaining what is meant by being approved or disapproved at the conclusion of the race.

 

 

Scripture is to be interpreted in the light of Scripture, and the approval or disapproval of an individual at the judgment seat of Christ must be understood in the light of Old Testament typology - namely the experiences of the Israelites under the leadership of Moses following the death of the paschal lambs in Egypt.  This is the primary, fundamental type which God uses in His Word to teach Christians great spiritual truths concerning dangers strewn along their present pilgrim pathway as they, under the leadership of Christ, traverse the only route which will culminate in the realization of the [future] salvation to be revealed - the salvation of their souls.

 

 

TYPE - ISRAEL IN THE WILDERNESS

 

 

On the night of the Passover in the land of Egypt, God established a distinction “between the Egyptians and Israel  This distinction was established on the basis of death and shed blood - the death and shed blood of the paschal lambs - and involved the birth and adoption of a nation (Ex. 4: 22, 23; 6: 6, 7; 11: 4-7; 12: 1-13; Hosea 2: 15).  Israel’s birth and adoption were for definite, specific purposes - namely the establishment of God’s firstborn son in the land covenanted to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, at the head of the nations, within a theocracy.

 

 

Not only was the “Feast of the Passover” instituted at this time but the “Feast of Unleavened Bread” was also instituted at the very beginning of Israel’s national existence.  Immediately following the Passover, Israel - the newly established nation, God’s firstborn son - was to eat “unleavened bread” for a period of seven days.  All leaven was to be put out of the house (house of Israel) during this period.

 

 

“Leaven in Scripture, always, without exception, portrays that which is evil, corrupt.  “Seven” is the number of perfection, indicating the completeness of that which is in view.  And regardless of the time or place - in Egypt before the Red Sea passage, in the wilderness after the Red Sea passage, or in the land of Canaan realizing the purpose for the nation’s calling - “evil typified by leaven, was to be put out of the house of Israel.  The penalty for not so doing was spelled out in no uncertain terms:

 

 

“... for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel” (Ex. 12: 15b).

 

 

Thus, God’s dual truth concerning “blood” and “leaven” was established at the very beginning of Israel’s existence as a nation.  The appropriation of the “blood” of slain lambs placed those who had come out of Egypt, forming the nation of Israel, in a particular relationship with God from which they could never be removed.  This, however, was only the beginning.  The entire purpose for Israel’s existence lay ahead; and after the appropriation of the blood of these slain lambs, everything associated with leaven was then to be put out of the house for the period specified.  Only in this manner could the nation realize the purpose for her removal from Egypt, the very purpose of her calling.

 

 

What though did Israel do relative to the Feast of Unleavened Bread following the appropriation of the blood of the slain paschal lambs?  Israel kept the feast in the sense of the seven literal days required by Ex. 12: 15 (cf. Ex. 12: 34, 39; 13: 1-10).  But did Israel keep the feast in the sense of that which it portrays must be done in the camp beyond this time?  Did Israel put sin out of the house during her pilgrim journey in the wilderness?

 

 

The answer of course, according to Scripture, is “No  Israel committed trespass after trespass against the Lord, climaxing the leavening process at Kadesh-Barnea.

 

 

Had Israel put leaven out of the house and followed the leadership of the Lord, the nation would have realized the purpose for her calling.  Israel would have exhibited faithfulness and entered into the land at Kadesh-Barnea, overthrown the inhabitants, and ruled over all the Gentile nations as God’s firstborn son within a theocracy, with the nations being blessed through Israel.

 

 

However, instead of exhibiting faithfulness, the Israelites exhibited unfaithfulness.  The entire accountable generation (save Caleb and Joshua, who possessed a different spirit) was overthrown in the wilderness.  Of the 600,000 fighting men who came out of Egypt, all but two were overthrown in the wilderness.  They were cut off from the house of Israel.  They were overthrown on the right side of the blood - cut off from Israel, not from God - and they fell short of the goal of their calling.

 

 

In this respect, according to the account of the wilderness journey of the Israelites in Hebrews chapter three, because of “unbeliefunfaithfulness’],” the nation failed to enter into the land at Kadesh-Barnea (v. 19).  The Israelites under Moses rejected that which God had to say concerning entrance into the land set before them.  They believed the false report of the ten spies rather than the true report of Caleb and Joshua.  At this point they fell away; and, as set forth in the antitype of Heb. 6: 4-6, it was then impossible “to renew them again unto repentance

 

 

(In the type, it was impossible for God to change His mind concerning that which He had previously stated would occur if the Israelites did not obey His voice; and, in the antitype, in like manner, it will be impossible for God to change His mind concerning that which He has previously stated will occur if Christians do not obey His voice.)

 

 

Why did the Israelites “fall away”?  What brought about such unbelief, unfaithfulness, on their part?  The answer can be found by comparing their attitude in two realms: (1) their attitude toward both “the food” (the manna) which God had provided and “the land” (the land of Canaan) which lay before them with (2) their attitude toward both “the food” (fish, etc.) which they had previously enjoyed in Egypt and “the land” (the land of Egypt) which they had left.

 

 

According to Numbers chapter eleven, they had rejected “the manna” and had longingly looked back to the food which they remembered in Egypt; and, almost immediately following, in Numbers chapters thirteen and fourteen, they had rejected “the land of Canaan” and had longingly looked back to the land of Egypt.

 

 

In each instance, their look was away from the things of God and the land set before them back to the things of the world and the god of this present world system (cf Luke 9: 62) - back to the things associated with the leavening process which had been working for almost eighteen months in the camp (“Egypt” in Scripture is always a type of the world, with its fleshly allures; and “Satan” is the god of this present world system).

 

 

Israel’s attitude concerning the manna preceded the nation’s attitude concerning the land.  Their refusal to go in and take the land could have been anticipated by their previous reaction to and rejection of the manna.  That is, because they had previously preferred the food in Egypt to the manna which God had provided, at Kadesh-Barnea they could only be expected to prefer the land of Egypt to the land of Canaan.  This fact can be clearly seen in the antitype.

 

 

ANTITYPE - CHRISMNS IN THE WILDERNESS

 

 

As a distinction was established “between the Egyptians and Israel” in the land of Egypt the night of the Passover, a distinction has been established between the world and Christians during the present day.  As the distinction during Moses’ day was established on the basis of death and shed blood, so has the distinction during the present day been established on the basis of death and shed blood.  Almost thirty-five hundred years ago in Egypt the distinguishing factor was the blood of the slain paschal lambs, and today the distinguishing factor is the blood of the slain Paschal Lamb.  Since Adam’s sin in Eden, the distinguishing factor has always been death and shed blood - something which never changes in Scripture (cf. Gen. 3: 21; Heb. 9: 22).

 

 

As Israel was called into existence for definite and specific purposes so has the Church been called into existence for definite and specific purposes.  Israel (“a prince” possessing “power with God and with men” [Gen. 32: 28]) was called into existence to rule as God’s firstborn son within a theocracy, and the Church has also been called into existence to rule as God’s firstborn son within a theocracy.  Israel was called into existence to rule on the earth at the head of the Gentile nations with God dwelling in Israel’s midst; and the Church has been called into existence to rule from the heavens over the Gentile nations with God’s firstborn Son, Jesus.

 

 

As Israel was commanded to keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread for seven days immediately following the Passover, so have Christians been commanded to keep this feast for the same length of time.   Immediately following that to which events of the Passover point (the birth from above, a passing “from death unto life”):

 

 

“Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?

 

 

Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened.  For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us:

 

 

“Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness: but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Cor. 5: 6b-8).

 

 

The feast is to be kept for a period of “seven days Indicating the completeness of that which is in view.  The entire Christian life from the point of salvation forward is in view.  During the present dispensation Christians reside in bodies of death, possessing the old sin nature; but during the coming dispensation (the Messianic Era) Christians will reside in sinless, deathless bodies like unto the body of Christ (cf. Rom. 7: 24; 1 John 1: 8; 3: 2).

 

 

During the coming dispensation the removal of leaven from the house will no longer be an issue, for it will have been put out once and for all.  Thus, the issue of Christians keeping the feast (in accordance with 1 Cor. 5: 6ff) and the dangers inherent in not keeping the feast are for the present dispensation alone, as it was for the Israelites during the past dispensation.

 

 

Israelites who failed to keep the feast were cut off from the house of Moses; and Christians who fall to keep the feast will fare no better, for they will be cut off from the house of Christ (Heb. 3: 1ff.

 

 

Thus, God’s dual truth concerning “blood” and “leaven established at the very beginning of Israel’s existence as a nation, is the same dual truth presently seen in Christendom today.  Through the appropriation of the blood of the slain Paschal Lamb - allowing for the immersion in the Spirit, forming the one new man “in Christ” - Christians form “a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people” (1 Peter 2: 9).  Christians occupy a positional standing “in Christ from which they can never be removed.

 

 

This, however, as in Israel’s case, is only the beginning.  The entire purpose for the Christians’ very existence lies ahead.  After the appropriation of the blood, everything associated with leaven is then to be put out of their lives for the period specified.  Only in this manner will Christians realize the purpose for their present positional standing “in Christ the very purpose for their calling.

 

 

Keeping the Feast of Unleavened Bread, outlined for Christians in 1 Corinthians chapter five, is not synonymous with Christians living sinless lives, living above sin.  Nor was this the case for those in Israel in the type.  This is by no means what is being taught in this passage, for since “sin entered into the world” through Adam (Rom. 5: 12), it has always been impossible for saved individuals to live apart from sin in such a manner, residing in bodies of death with the old sin nature.

 

 

The fact that the Israelites could and did sin following events surrounding the death of the firstborn was the reason for Aaron’s past high priestly ministry in the earthly tabernacle.  And the fact that Christians can and do sin is the reason for Christ’s present high priestly ministry in the heavenly tabernacle.

 

 

Christ is ministering today in the antitype of Aaron, on the basis of His shed blood on the mercy seat, on behalf of Christians who sin.  The sins committed by Christians are forgiven through confession of these sins on the basis of the shed blood of Christ which “cleansethkeeps on cleansing’] us from all sin

 

 

In this respect, Christians keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread today in a twofold manner; abstention from every appearance of evil on the one hand, and confession of sins when overtaken by evil on the other hand (1 Thess. 5: 22; 1 John 1: 7-10).  All leaven is to either be put out or kept out of one’s life in this twofold manner; and Christians conducting their lives in this fashion, correspondingly, keep the feast.

 

 

However, as Israel failed to keep the feast in the type (in the preceding twofold manner), so are Christians failing to keep the feast in the antitype (in the same twofold manner).

 

 

The Israelites committed trespass after trespass against the Lord, disregarding that which God had commanded; and they climaxed their sins by rejecting the manna and rejecting the land of Canaan.  They looked back to the things of Egypt in both instances.

 

 

And Christians are doing exactly the same thing.  The Church has become so enmeshed in the things of the world that it is becoming increasingly difficult to tell where the world ends and the Church begins.  The sins of Christians, as the sins of Israel - disregarding, as well, that which God has commanded - have led them down a path where they are rejecting the things typified by both the manna and the land of Canaan.

 

 

The manna was that bread from heaven which God had provided to sustain the Israelites while on their pilgrim journey.  This bread contained everything necessary for the sustenance and health of the physical body throughout the wilderness journey, as the Israelites looked ahead to an inheritance in the land set before them (an earthly inheritance and land).

 

 

And the counterpart for Christians today is the Bread from heaven, “the Word of God  This Word contains everything necessary for the sustenance and health of the spiritual man throughout the pilgrim journey (cf. John 6: 30-58; Luke 4: 4), as Christians look ahead to an inheritance in the land set before them (a [millennial and] heavenly inheritance and land).

 

 

The Israelites, remembering the food which they had while in Egypt, tried to change the manna.  They “ground it in mills, or beat it in a mortar, and baked it in pans, and made cakes of it   Through this process they ruined the manna, for the taste was like “fresh oil [a bland taste, made with olive oil]” (Num. 11: 4-8).

 

 

Christians today have done exactly the same thing with the Word of God; and, according to the type, it is because of their carnal desires for the food served in Egypt, i.e., it is because of their carnal desires for the nourishment which the world provides.  Christians have tried to change the Word of God to conform to the things of the world, seeking to make this Word palatable to both the world and themselves.  And emanating out of this process are such things as the paraphrased versions of the Bible which are supposed to help us better understand the Scriptures, and the shortened, compressed versions which are for individuals who don’t have time to read the Word as given through Moses and the prophets.  Or, the Word is often interpreted in a manner which allows worldly palatability for carnally minded Christians.

 

 

God revealed Himself, His plans, and His purposes to man in “pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times”; and God has “magnified his word above his name” (Psa. 12: 6; 138: 2).  Beyond that, God has made this revelation known after a certain fashion (history, prophecy, types interwoven within history, antitypes, metaphors, parables, etc.).  And for finite man to make changes after any fashion, which would include refusing to recognize the manner in which God has made this revelation known, can result in only one thing, seen in the type: Changing the manna during Moses’ day ruined that which God had provided for the people, and changing the Manna today serves only to accomplish this same destructive end.

 

 

The importance of recognizing this whole thing for what it really is, no matter what form it may take - a Satanic attack upon the Word of God - becomes evident when one understands the proper place which the Word occupies in the life of a Christian.  God has breathed life (the Neshamah [initial work of the Spirit]) into man, effecting the birth from above (cf. Gen. 1: 1-3; 2: 7; John 3: 3).  He then continues this life through the indwelling presence of His Breath (the Neshamah [indwelling of the Spirit; 1 Cor. 6: 19]), and nourishes and sustains this life through a continued breathing in (the Neshamah / Theoneustos [the God-Breathed, Living Word; 2 Tim. 3: 16; James 1: 21]).  The indwelling Holy Spirit (the Neshamah), in this manner, takes the Word of God (the Neshamah) received into man’s saved human spirit and effects spiritual growth unto maturity.

 

 

That which God delivered to man through Moses and the prophets constitutes the Neshamah - the God-Breathed Oracles - not that which carnal man has changed by seeking to make it palatable to himself and the world.  And the Holy Spirit (the Neshamah) uses the God-Breathed Oracles (the Neshamah) alone to effect a Christian’s spiritual growth unto maturity.  That which is not the Word of God (not the Neshamah) substituted for the Word of God (the Neshamah) can only produce spiritually anaemic, sick Christians, for the Holy Spirit cannot use that which is not the Breath of God to effect spiritual growth.  The Holy Spirit cannot use that which is lifeless to nourish and sustain life, which He (through the Neshamah) brought into existence.

 

 

In this respect, that which man has changed today approximates the Living Word of God to the same degree that the manna which the Israelites changed approximated the manna which God delivered to them from heaven.  The Israelites, through changes, ruined the manna; and Christians (also the unsaved in certain instances, for monetary gain), through changes, have ruined the Word of God.

 

 

Thus, it is easy to understand why the Israelites under Moses preferred the things of Egypt to the things of the land set before them (their earthly inheritance [cf. Num. 14: 12; Heb. 11: 8]), and why innumerable Christians today prefer the things of the world to the things of the land set before them (their [millennial and] heavenly Inheritance [cf. Heb. 1: 14; 3: 1; 1 Peter 1: 4]).  The Israelites desired to feast on the things of Egypt rather than the manna which God had provided, and Christians today are exhibiting exactly the same attitude and are doing exactly the same thing relative to the things of the world and the Word of God.

 

 

The spirituality of the Israelites, brought about through their association with Egypt, was at such a low ebb that they didn’t believe it was possible for them to go in and conquer the inhabitants of the land.  Thus, they sought to appoint a new leader and return to Egypt (Num. 14: 14) - completely overcome by the enemy before ever engaging the enemy in battle.

 

 

The spirituality of many Christians today, brought about through their association with the world, is at such a low ebb that they, in like manner, refuse to believe it is possible for them to go in and conquer the inhabitants of the land (cf. Eph. 6: 10-17).  Thus, they, as the Israelites under Moses, seek their place in the world, under the sun - completely overcome by the enemy before ever engaging the enemy in battle.

 

 

CONCLUDING THOUGHS

 

 

The importance of feasting on the Manna from heaven cannot be overemphasized.  A Christian must receive “the implanted word [the ‘Neshamah’]” or he cannot realize the [future] salvation of his soul.  The reason is very simple: Apart from the reception of this Word there can be no spiritual growth unto maturity.  And without spiritual growth, wrought through a continued inbreathing of “life” into man, there can be no movement of the spiritual man, producing “works” emanating from “a living” faith.

 

 

The race will have been run in no certain manner, with no fixed goal, as one beating the air.  And, as revealed in 1 Cor. 9: 24 - 10: 11, a race run in this manner will result in the individual being disapproved, for he will have been overcome and thus overthrown in the wilderness.

 

 

Accordingly, such an individual at the judgment seat of Christ will have his works tried, with a view to approval; but these works will be shown to be “dead [barren]” works, emanating from unfaithfulness, producing nothing but “wood, hay, stubble  These will all be burned in the fire, leaving the individual in the position, “saved [salvation of his spirit]; yet so as bythrough’] fire” (1 Cor. 3: 12-15).

 

 

His works will be disapproved, and works of this nature will have failed to bring faith to its proper goal. Consequently, the individual’s faith will also be disapproved, and he will “suffer loss” -  the loss of his soul.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

 

196

 

THY KINGDOM COME*

 

 

BY DAVID  W.  DYER

 

 

* Edited from Chapter Two of the author’s book ‘Thy Kingdom Come’.

 

 

Before we get very far in this book, one thing must be made very clear if the readers are to properly understand this message, and that is that the “Kingdom of Heaven” is not heaven.  Let me say that again.  When the New Testament uses the phrase “the Kingdom of Heaven” it is not referring to heaven.  Instead it is referring to the Kingdom about which we have been talking.  Much of the misunderstanding - which believers have about this subject stems only from hearsay, preconceived notions or wrong teaching rather than being based on the Word of God.  Too often Bible teachers erroneously place a great deal of emphasis upon heaven as the eternal dwelling place of believers.  Those who hear this teaching may then mistakenly apply to heaven verses which are actually about the Kingdom without realizing what they are doing.  This is a problem which we are now attempting to correct.  It is important when we are trying to understand the Bible [Page 18] that we are careful not to assume anything or to be guided by supposition.  There is no verse of scripture which tells us that the Kingdom of Heaven is heaven.  If we are to really understand the Kingdom of God, it is essential that we be able to allow ourselves to be corrected by the Word of God, even when it contradicts cherished notions.

 

 

Perhaps the confusing element in the phrase “the Kingdom of Heaven” are the words “of heaven  What these words actually mean is that the Kingdom has its origin in heaven - that it is heavenly in its nature and content.  They do not mean that it is heaven.  God reigns supreme in heaven.  Heaven is the focus of His authority - the point from which He rules the universe.  The words “of heaven” then are referring to the source of this Kingdom about which Jesus testified.  Again, the prayer which He taught His disciples to pray clearly paints the picture: “Thy kingdom come ... on earth as it is in heaven” (Mt. 6: 10 NASB).  Jesus’ prayer was that the Father’s heavenly Kingdom would be fully manifested on the earth.  So we see that although the Kingdom of Heaven is heavenly in character and origin, it is not heaven.

 

 

It is interesting to note that of all the New Testament writers, only the Apostle Matthew uses the phrase “the Kingdom of Heaven  All of the other writers use the phrase “the Kingdom of God  In the four gospels, when the writers are quoting the same parables of Jesus, Matthew uses “the Kingdom of Heaven” and the other three say “the Kingdom of God  This shows us that these terms are used interchangeably in the inspired Word.  There is no difference between the two.  Such an observation also reinforces the idea that the “Kingdom of Heaven” is not heaven.*

 

[* NOTE:  The same principle can be shown by the use the words “a heavenly land”.  It is not a “land” in Heaven, as so many Christians believe, but a land on this earth during in “the age to come” (Heb. 6: 5, R.V.): the LAND is described by the adjective “heavenly”.  In other words, the “land of Israel,” and all other lands on this earth (2 Pet. 3: 8, R.V.), will one ‘DAY’ be blessed by the King of heaven and earth - (our LORD and SAVIOUR Jesus, the Christ/Messiah) after His Second Advent:  “Break forth into joy, sing together, ye waste places of Jerusalem: for the LORD hath comforted his people, he hath redeemed Jerusalem.  The LORD hath made bare his holy arm in the eyes of all nations; and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God;” (Isa. 52: 9. 10, R.V.)  Again, - “Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king and deal wisely, and shall execute judgment and justice in the land.  In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is the name whereby he shall be called, The LORD is our righteousness:” (Jeremiah 23: 5, 6, R.V.). cf. Lk. 1: 32; 13: 29; 22: 28-30; Rom. 8: 19-22; Rev. 2: 25-27; 11: 15, R.V.).]

 

[Page 19]

The Jewish people who were listening to Jesus teach did not have a problem understanding that He was referring to an earthly Kingdom.  On the contrary, many of them had difficulty realizing the spiritual aspects of it.  For centuries they had been waiting for Messiah- the King who would lead them out of bondage.  They well knew the scriptures prophesying that One would come to sit on the throne of David and rule over them (Is. 9: 7).  When Herod questioned the scribes regarding the place of the Messiah’s birth, they knew the exact location.  The coming of a King to set up an earthly Kingdom was no secret to them.  What they failed to realize was that the prophesied coming of Jesus consisted of two events.  There was a first coming and there will be a second one - one to which all true [pre-millennial] believers are looking forward.  And it is at the second one that He will establish His earthly, physical Kingdom.

 

 

What the Jews did not realize then, but what we know now, is that these two comings of Christ correspond to two aspects of the Kingdom.  First, there is a present spiritual experience of the Kingdom into which Christians can enter and second, there is the coming outward manifestation of the Kingdom on this earth.  Today we can experience the Kingdom spiritually, and someday soon it is coming to the earth physically.  On the one hand, referring to the first, Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (Jn. 18: 36).  But on the other hand, the scriptures read, “The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ, (Rev 11: 15).  Although the spiritual aspect of the Kingdom, ushered in with the first advent of Christ, and the outward manifestation of it, which begins [Page 20] with the second coming, are separated by 2,000 years, they have very much in common.  In fact they are inseparable and completely interrelated.

 

 

In order to have a good comprehension of these two facets of the Kingdom of God, perhaps it will first be necessary to talk about just what a kingdom is.  A kingdom is a certain geographical area which is governed by a king.  A kingdom - [upon and over this restored earth (Rom. 8: 19-21)] - is also a collection of people who are subjected to the will and dictates of a particular king.* Actually these two definitions fit exactly with the two “Kingdoms” about which we have been talking.  With Christ’s first coming He is gathering to Himself a people.  With His second, He will establish His rightful rulership over this world.  His first advent heralded the assertion of His Lordship over the hearts and lives of men who are willing to submit themselves to Him, and His second, His Kingship over all the inhabited earth.

 

[* See Ps. 2: 8; 110: 1-3. cf. Eph. 5: 5; Col. 3: 25; Heb 12: 16, 17, R.V.).]

 

 

In most of the free world today people have a lot of trouble understanding the concept of “king  There are very few rulers today who claim to be kings, and those that do (except perhaps in the Middle East) actually wield very little power.  The idea of bowing before someone and being obedient to his every wish is foreign to us if not even repulsive.  The very thought of not being in control of their own lives has not even entered very many men’s minds.  We in this country are used to “freedom” and any “kings” that come along may have some difficulty asserting their influence over us.  Alas, such is the situation with Jesus Christ and much of His Church today.  We, His people, rightfully belong to Him, but are submitted to His authority very little.

 

 

 

Perhaps a word which could be used to better [Page 21] describe what the Biblical word “king” should mean to us is the word “dictator  Here is a word to which our world can relate.  It holds for us the idea of a man who wields absolute power.  His word is law and no one dares to disobey.  This is really what the Bible means when it uses the word “king (The word “Lord by the way, has a very similar meaning.)  Although “dictator” may convey to us the idea of harshness or cruelty while our King, Jesus, is not that way, still the concept of absolute power and authority is exactly correct.  God has made this same Jesus who was crucified both King and Lord.  In fact, He is King of kings and Lord of lords (Rev 19: 16).  It is to Him we must submit ourselves and Him we must obey.

 

 

Now, with this in mind, we can talk a little about the Kingdom of God.  The Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Heaven is the sphere over which God’s authority extends.  It consists of the territory and the beings over which He rules.  Most of the universe fits into this category.  One exception is this earth and the majority of the people on it.  The Bible teaches us that this world is presently in the hands of the devil and he is a prince over it and its inhabitants (Jn 14: 30).  Although Jesus has defeated him at the cross, this victory has not yet been fully manifested.  God is just now in the process of establishing His rightful authority over this world. When Jesus Christ returns, the devil will be chained up for 1,000 years (Rev 20: 1-3) and He will reign supreme in all the earth.

 

 

As mentioned previously, the first place that He is starting to rule and the area in which He is working today is the hearts and lives of men and women.  Through the events of His first advent, Jesus Christ [Page 22] gained the authority to transfer people out of this world’s kingdom of darkness into His own Kingdom of light.  He has redeemed mankind with His own precious blood and purchased us for His own possession.  Now we are rightfully His!  Whereas once we were obedient to the evil ruler of this age, now we need be subjected to him no longer.  Jesus has set us free.  Although we were God’s because He made us, Satan usurped this authority in the garden of Eden through his temptation of Adam and Eve.  Now, Jesus Christ is in the process of recovering us from this fall and re-establishing His Kingship over His people.  Hallelujah!

 

 

There is, however, a very interesting aspect of Christ’s Kingdom to which we must pay very careful attention. Jesus will reign over only those who are willing.  He will be a King over only those who want Him to be. When He came in person to the Jews in Israel most of them rejected Him.  At one point their leaders who were supposed to be waiting for Messiah declared, “We have no king but Caesar” (Jn 19: 15).  And so it is still today.  We can either accept or reject the Kingship of Jesus Christ.  But there is a day coming when this option will lapse.  When Jesus Christ comes again, the scriptures tell us that every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus is Lord (Phil. 2: 10, 11).  At this time He will powerfully subject the whole earth and the inhabitants thereof to Himself (Lk. 19: 27).

 

 

These days in evangelical circles, a person can hear many people preaching such things as “receive Jesus,” “trust Jesus,” or “ask Jesus into your life  These things are true and right and good.  However, this is not the whole story.  What seems to be missing [Page 23] from this kind of preaching is that when we receive Jesus, we receive Him for what He is - King and Lord.  When the first disciples preached, they preached the Lord Jesus Christ. They proclaimed a Christ who wanted full allegiance, who asked for a total commitment of the rest of their lives and who required a complete separation from what was not in His Kingdom.  This is why they saw such marvellous results.  Those preachers did not overemphasize what Christ could do for the people but they announced what the people’s responsibility was toward God.  They knew who Jesus was.  He was the King promised long ago and they were wise enough to submit themselves totally to Him.  How we [Christians (Acts 11: 26, R.V.)] could stand a good dose of this kind of preaching today!  How we need to follow their example!

 

 

This is one explanation of why we have so many lukewarm, insincere converts to Christianity today.  We tell them something like: “If only you will receive Jesus He will make you happy and make you feel good and help you, with your life  On the other hand Jesus preached: “Repent (totally change your way of thinking and living) for the Kingdom (the rulership) of Heaven is at hand  This then is the problem.  When we lead someone to receive Christ without making it very plain to them the total commitment which is required, at first things. may go along just fine.  But sooner or later Jesus will begin to assert His rightful Lordship over their lives.  Since these converts have not been prepared for anything like that, many times they turn away and walk with Him no more.  Or sometimes there begins a long and painful struggle with God about who is to run their lives.  We could easily spare people this problem by [Page 24] telling them the [whole] truth* from the beginning. Let us tell them plainly that they should not even begin to build a tower until they sit down and thoroughly count the cost.  I am afraid that we water down the gospel to get “numbers” “saved” when in reality we are doing service neither to God nor to them.  It is all too easy to immunize converts with easy Christianity, making it all the harder for them to later realize the truth.

 

[* Acts 20: 25-27, R.V.]

 

 

This then is the gospel of the Kingdom.  It is the gospel that Jesus preached.  We are to repent because there is a spiritual Kingdom which has been announced in which God is to have complete control over every aspect of our lives.  And there is an outward, earthly manifestation of this Kingdom coming soon to this earth of which we can be a part if we are willing.  Actually, there is no other gospel.  Although we usually hear only other aspects of it, this is really what the Bible teaches.

 

 

The Kingdom of God today is an inward, spiritual Kingdom.  It is a Kingdom which does not come with observation (Lk 17: 20, 21).  This means that it is not yet manifested outwardly.  The subjection of a man’s heart to Jesus Christ is a hidden thing.  To enter such a Kingdom, which is spiritual in nature, firstly requires a new, spiritual birth.  Just as we were born physically to enter into this world, so we need to be born again of the Spirit of God to enter into the spiritual Kingdom of God (Jn. 3: 5).  This new birth itself requires an element of [faith-] submission to God.  To have it [during the coming millennium] we must repent for our sins and acknowledge Jesus’ rightful Lordship over our lives.  In the process [of our repentance and restoration] He cleanses us from our sins with His precious blood and makes us one with God.

 

[Page 25]

Once we enter the sphere of God’s reigning over us, it is essential that we continue submitting ourselves to Him if we are to keep on experiencing the present [and future millennial] Kingdom of God.  Unfortunately, after we enter God’s [spiritual] Kingdom, it is all too possible for us to rebel [and apostatize] against Him.  As mentioned previously, today Jesus will rule over only those who are willing for Him to do so.  Just as our initial entrance into His Kingdom depended upon our willingness to meet certain requirements [Eph. 2: 8.], so our continued willingness is crucial if we are to be His subjects.  God will not force Himself on anyone.  Unless we want Him to be our King, He will not be.  We all have to choose.

 

 

I would like to emphasize here that this is a choice which we have to make every day if not every minute of every day.  There is a constant battle going on.  Satan wants to retain his control over our lives and keep us subjected to himself.  Unfortunately there is still an old nature within us, a product of our first natural birth, which sides with the devil against God.  But Jesus Christ has overcome all that is within us and all that is within the world.  The new life with [the Holy Spirit’s leading, and] the new nature which has been born into us has the power to overcome all opposition.  Within us we have the supernatural power to overcome Satan and his kingdom.  The pivotal point however is that we must be completely willing to submit ourselves to God.  If we are, He will give us the power to overcome.  If not we will only end up serving the devil.  How many [regenerate] Christians are in this boat!  They belong to God, but in their daily lives they submit themselves to this world and the ruler of it.  Oh how we believers need to submit ourselves totally, without reservation, to our rightful Lord and Creator!  What a shame it is [Page 26] when we go our own way, but what a glory to God when we willingly live in His Kingdom and allow Him to be the Lord of our lives!

 

 

So we see that there are two aspects of the Kingdom of God.  There is a present spiritual reality of which we can be a part, and there is the coming earthly manifestation of it.  As stated earlier, our role in the coming Kingdom has everything to do with our participation in the present one.  Do not be fooled.  No one who serves themselves today will be rewarded tomorrow.  The Kingdom of Heaven which is coming is not separate from the one we can be experiencing today.  They are really the same thing.  They have one King, one purpose and one reality.  I beg you, submit yourselves to God today.

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

197

 

HADES: SOME OBJECTIONS

 

 

BY J. C. HULL (Belfast)

 

 

 

Doubtless many will take exception to some of the views offered in the foregoing pages; and, while we regret this, yet we must make it clear that we write not of what we have been taught by our fellowmen, but from a close personal study of God’s Word.  We are convinced that we have set forth nothing other than the Scriptural doctrine of Hades and allied themes, brief, concise, and to the point: this we are prepared to offer to God, to His glory, knowing that there is no duplicity, in our heart.

 

 

Probably, the chief objection will be that the saints do not go to Hades at death, but direct to heaven and we shall be asked: “Have you never read 2 Corinthians 5: 8 where Paul says that ‘to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord’ or Philippians 1: 23 - ‘having a desire to depart and be with Christ which is far better ....’”?  To this we answer that we are aware of the many Scriptures used to support the view that the departed saints are now in heaven, but - we cannot accept these as they are texts in isolation and as such they may support that particular view, they do not harmonise with the rest of the Scriptures on this teaching, and in fact even contradict it, this we hope to show in this section.  Let us now look at these ‘mainstays’ of this view and examine them a little closer and see if they say what they are supposed to say.

 

 

If we were to read 2 Corinthians 5: 8 in the R.V. or a good literal translation, we will note that there is a singularly different rendering, but never-the-less an important one.  There it reads:- “absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord  To he present with the Lord DEMANDS that the person should always be before the Lord’s presence.  To be at home demands only that the person be required to dwell in the abode supplied by the Lord - let it he it will.  Take an example from daily life: one can be living at home with one’s father yet the father be seldom there because he is a travelling man.  On the other hand, to he present with one’s father demands that he should he accompanied on his travels.

 

 

Paul’s yearning to be at home with the Lord requires nothing more than what was the desire of the Old Testament saints when they spoke in a similar strain.

 

 

Job speaks thus: “I know that Thou wilt bring me to death, and to the house (BAYITH - HOME) appointed for ALL living” (Job. 30: 23).  The word “BAYITH” is rendered some 25 times in the Old Testament as “home  The word used in the New Testament is “ENDEMEO” and the translators render it as ‘home’ in verse 6:- “whilst we are at HOME in the body, we are absent from the Lord  As we have seen in our study, the saints of the old economy looked forward to going to this “abode” of the Lord at death - it was our equivalent to going home to be with the Lord, although nowadays WE have changed its sense to “going to heaven  To the saint that is that little bit older in the Lord than others, we ask, “Does it not seem a pleasant prospect at times to be finished with this sinful world and to depart to be at home with the Lord  Before we leave this, let it be recalled that in the 23rd Psalm, it speaks of the Old Testament saint going “through the valley of the shadow of death ... FOR THOU ART WITH ME  Now the destination of the saint in this passage will not be doubted - it was ‘Sheol’, yet he was assured of the presence of the Lord.  In Psalm 116: 15 we read, “Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints  Is the saint’s death any more precious today than it was 3000 years ago when this was written?  Christ the Lord confirmed in every instance the customs of death as laid down by the Father, who are we that we should set these aside and MAKE OUR OWN WAY THROUGH DEATH’S DARK VALE?

 

 

Ephesians 4: 8: “Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men

 

 

It is held that this verse teaches that when Christ ascended to the Father, He led captivity captive - meaning the captive saints of Sheol were loosed from their bondage, and ever since have (and do) dwell in heaven with the Lord.   There is no doubt that in isolation this text can be made to say this; but if it is to read harmoniously with the rest of the scriptures then it cannot mean what has been stated above.  The expression “led captivity captive” is used twice in the Old Testament.  The first occurs in Judges 5: 11 and is the cry of Deborah to Barak who had returned victorious from a battle with Sisera.  She was instructing him as the victorious commander to lead forth in a victory parade in which he would go in front of his chained ENEMY CAPTIVES.  Deborah certainly did not mean that he was to gather his own soldiers who may have been prisoners of Sisera and whom had been released at victory.

 

 

The second mention is found in Psalm 68: 18, and it has the same thought.  The Psalm records a military operation - when God arises His enemies are dispersed and those that hate Him flee.  Then after a mighty victory, we read in verse 18, which Norlie translates as, “You have emerged victorious carrying off captives and receiving tribute from men, EVEN FROM REBELS  The same translator renders Ephesians 4: 8 as, “When he went on high, He took many captives with Him, and He gave gifts to men

 

 

We ask a simple straightforward question at this point: did Paul when he quoted this verse from Psalm 68, mean to reverse the interpretation from the original?  His reversal of the meaning seems to us more like the work of man - especially in the light of Colossians 2: 15 where Paul distinctly tells us that Christ, having spoiled (gained the victory) over principalities and powers, He Made a show of them openly (a public spectacle) in which He triumphed over them in it.  These then are the captives which the Lord led forth in triumph, and this harmonises with the tenor of Scripture rather than clashing even to the point of contradiction.

 

 

Further, if the general interpretation of Ephesians 4: 8 is correct, can it be explained why, when these captive saints were led out of Sheol and into heaven, was king David left behind?  Peter, speaking under inspiration of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2: 29, 34, concerning David says, “Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. ... For David is not ascended into heaven  The time factor is very important here, for Peter speaks on the Day of Pentecost which was ten days AFTER the Lord ascended into heaven.  We are told by those who see in Ephesians 4: 8 the saints being feel led aloft, that Sheol - or at least that part of Abraham’s bosom and Paradise - is now empty; but how can this be if even one saint were left behind and most certainly David is still there?  We have shown by quoting the early church writers that none of them believed that saints to be anywhere other than that place called Abraham’s bosom.

 

 

Then, it is objected, Paul in Philippians 1: 23 had a desire to depart and ‘be with Christ which is far better’ -     does not this carry the import that the saint goes to heaven at death? To isolate this verse on its own, it could be made to say so: but we do not believe that it does - this is reading into it what one WANTS to see there.  We have shown that it is GAIN for the saint to die, and he who is living in the fullness of the Lord   actually looks forward to “being with Christ” but whether he wants to believe it or not, he will go to that “home” spoken of by Job (30: 23) and Paul (2 Corinthians 5: 8).  These saints are not tucked away in a corner and forgotten about until the [first] resurrection - no, far from it for they are alive unto God (Luke 20: 38) and can commune with the Lord (Revelation 6: 9-11.)  They - being unhindered by the body of sin and being in nature, spirit - can appreciate the presence of the Lord to a degree far beyond that which we can comprehend.  This is the thought behind the words of Philippians 1: 6, where the good work of Christ CONTINUES in the       [obedient]* believer until the [millennial] day of Christ, which will be the day, of his perfection.  Let us acknowledge that even in this body of sin, we can still appreciate to some degree the presence of the Lord - for        has He not promised this to His [obedient and repentant] people (Matthew 18: 20)?

 

 

If we had read further in Ephesians 4 and had gone to verse 10, we would have had the answer concerning the presence of the Lord.  There we read, “He that descended is the same that ascended far above all heavens THAT HE MIGHT FILL ALL THINGS  That is, that He might fill the universe with His presence, and must not this be so for the fulfilment of Matthew I8: 20?  The Psalmist had this thought in mind when he wrote, “Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence?  If I ascend into heaven, thou [art] there: if I make my bed in hell [sheol], behold, thou [art there].”  No matter where the saint goes in life or death, he is assured of the presence of the Lord.

 

 

Let us not forget the circumstances in which Paul wrote the words of Philippians 1: 23.  He was languishing in prison, chained night and day to a Roman soldier, and the treatment of prisoners in those days left a lot to be desired.  Remember also that he was now an old man with a hard physical life behind him (2 Corinthians 11: 23-29).  Under such circumstances can we be surprised that he yearned to be with Christ which is far better? But, If we say “heaven” then we are reading into the Scriptures something that we ASSUME to be there, and this can be a dangerous course in the study of the Word of God.  We say then that there is insufficient evidence in these words of Paul to substantiate a premise that his departure would mean his going to heaven. Our answer is that there is nothing in these Scriptures that are not satisfied in our remarks of Philippians 1: 23: but, however, we are of the opinion that these scriptures refer to a yet future event when the resurrected saint shall be caught up to be with the Lord (1 Thessalonians 4: 17).

 

 

What is probably the final and most important objection is found in Paul’s words of 2 Corinthians 12: 1-14.  He speaks of an experience which doubtless he had himself, although, whether it was himself or someone else is immaterial.  The fact of the matter was that he was caught away to the “third heaven” (verse 2) and caught away to Paradise.  This is generally believed because this is one vision and that the “third heaven” is Paradise. This is generally believed because of three points.  First, one wants to believe it because it is attractive and helps bear out some other “general beliefs  Second, because of an inaccurate reading of the scripture.  And third, because of the little unauthorised word “up” being inserted in the English text.

 

 

If we read the text aright, we see that Paul speaks of visions and revelations (plural), so we must expect him to speak of more than one experience, and when we continue to read we see that he does. It says in our version that he was “caught up” to the third heaven - it does not say so in the Greek.  The rendered “Caught up” is HARPAZO and literally means to “catch away” BUT DOES NOT CONVEY THE SENSE OF DIRECTION.  This can only be gained by adding the appropriate word and thus indicating direction.  The translators in this case have added “up” and, no doubt, rightly.  There are far too many, references in scripture as to the direction of heaven to cause doubt on this point.

 

 

When we come to the second experience, we see that they assume it was the same one he had already spoken of, and again they add the word “up  This however, is quite wrong, for nowhere in scripture do we get the impression that “paradise” is up in heaven. (The word is mentioned three times in the New Testament: Luke 23: 43; Revelation 2: 7; and in our text).

 

 

There can be no doubt at all as to the meaning of “paradise” in Luke 23: 43, or its location - for the thief received the promise that he would be there that same day with the Lord Jesus.  If we read in the scripture that three days later the Lord had not yet ascended into heaven, and also that when He died He descended into the lower parts of the earth, we must conclude with the Jewish belief that paradise was part of Sheol, which, by the way, the Lord condoned in Luke 16.  (Compare Luke 23: 43; John 20: 17; Matthew 12: 40; Romans 12: 7; Ephesians 4: 9).

 

 

The mention of paradise in Revelation 2: 7 on its own is incomplete, for then it is only part of a term which in its fulness is “the paradise of God”: and this we believe to be part of the future (Revelation 22: 2).  Whereas the “paradise” of Luke and 2 Corinthians has to do with the believer in the spirit or unclothed state (2 Corinthians 5: 14) BEFORE resurrection.  The “paradise of God” will be enjoyed by the [resurrected] believer in his clothed state i.e. in the spiritual - [and restored earth (Rom. 8: 19-21. cf. Acts 7: 5, R.V.), with an immortal body of “flesh and bones” (Luke 24: 39ff)] - AFTER the resurrection (1 Corinthians 15: 51-54).

 

 

These, we would hazard, are the chief objections that could be raised to what has been written and they are not really objections, except of course if they are read with a view to supporting a theory.

 

 

In our study, we have dealt with the theme of Hades and have tried to keep within the limits of what the scriptures reveal concerning it.  We have not brought in any other topics other than the “lake of fire” which we touched on lightly because it is the ultimate of Hades (Revelation 20: 14) and therefore closely connected.  We trust that this short treatise will be used of the Lord to exercise His people to a more diligent study of His own precious Word, wherein alone is to be found truth.  Oh, that we are more like the Bereans of old.  Who searched the Scriptures daily whether these things were so (Acts 17: 10-11).  Unfortunately we are not; for if a thing is said from the pulpit or something is read in a book of a “sound” author, these are accepted without question or investigation.  In closing, let the Word of God as spoken through David have the last word: “It is better to trust in the Lord, than to put confidence in man” (Psalm 118: 8).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

198

 

ANTI-SEMITISM

 

 

Scripture Readings

 

 

“And an angel of the Lord called Abraam the second time out of heaven, saying, I have sworn by myself, says the Lord, because thou hast done this thing, and on my account hast not spared thy beloved son, surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of heaven, and as the sand which is by the shore of the sea, and thy seed shall inherit the cities of their enemies.  And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, because thou hast hearkened to my voice(Gen. 22: 15-18, Septuagint,).

 

 

“By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his inheritance, obeyed and went: All these people were still living by faith when they died.  They did not receive the things promised (Heb. 11: 8, 13, NIV)

 

 

“So he [Abraham] left the land of the Chaldeans and settled in Haran.  After the death of his father, God sent him to this land where you are now living.  He gave him no inheritance here, not even a foot of ground.  But God promised him and his descendants after him would possess the land. ..:” (Acts 7: 4, 5, NIV).

 

 

-------

 

 

 

1.  Many circumstances have conspired to produce the outburst of hatred of the Jew.  Some of the emancipated Jews have, through their great ability and energy, risen to high and influential positions in literature, commerce and finance.  This has provoked the envy and jealousy of the peoples amongst whom they dwell, who complain of the supplanting of the children of the soil, and the predominance of an alien race.  Wealth and influence, too, have paid the usual penalty attached to greatness when it refuses to render itself amenable to the designs of others; and the Jew has become obnoxious to those to whom he would not become subservient.  The difficulties, also, of the industrial classes in their struggle for existence, intensified by competition from without, has caused them to regard with little favour the immigrant Jew, who, flying from persecution elsewhere, has come to seek a share in that employment which is already too scarce, and which is regarded as being too scantily rewarded.  Anarchists too, and socialists, ignorant of the general level of indigence which characterizes the Jews as a people, regard with special enmity a race which numbers amongst its members some very wealthy and conspicuous money-lenders, bankers, financiers and merchant princes; and the war against property in general is directed specially against the Jew.  Besides all this, deep-rooted animosity against the Jew, regarded as the destroyer of the Founder of Christianity, and the enemy of His creed and adherents, ever latent amongst ill-instructed Christians, seems ready to exhibit itself as an active force. - N. S. TAYLOR.

 

 

2. An encyclopaedia of anti-Semitism in six volumes was published in Germany under the name of Sigilla Veri The Seal of the True”).  It treats the Jews as “an anti-race”, and deals with “their manners, their customs, their thieves’ tongues, their assumed names, their secret circles”.  Among its features are “Jewish portraits of world-wide interest that will finally prove the Jews to be no human race at all but an anti-race, a pathological race of parasites”.

 

 

3. Pharaoh tried to annihilate the Hebrews, and all the firstborn of Egypt died.  Amalek tried it and perished. Sihon, king of the Amorites, Og, King of Bashan, tried it and perished.  The Assyrian Empire, the Babylonian Empire tried it and passed off the stage of human history, and the eternal Jew lives on.  Haman indulged his hatred of the Jew, and almost succeeded in his programme of extermination.  But he ended on the gallows built for Mordecai.  Daniel’s envious enemies and their families ended in the lion’s den.  The Edomites, Esau’s descendants, tried to destroy the Jews and perished.  Antiochus Epiphanes tried to destroy the Jews and perished.  Roman Emperors tried it, and all of Europe tried it through the Dark Ages.  Jeremiah (30: 16), like all the Old Testament prophets, was supernaturally exact when he said, “All they that devour thee shall be devoured; and all that prey upon thee will I give for a prey

 

 

Anti-Semitism proves the supernatural character of the Bible.  In Deuteronomy 28. - 32. is the most appalling description of human suffering ever written.  Though written more than three thousand years ago, it predicts in detail the history of the Jews of three thousand years.  It has been fulfilled continuously, century after century... [down to the present time.] “Thou shalt become an astonishment, a proverb, and a by-word, among all the nations whither the Lord shall send thee (Dent. 38: 37).  So also in Jeremiah 24: 9: “And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them  Also, Jeremiah 29: 18, “And I will persecute them with the sword, with the famine, and with the pestilence, and will deliver them to be removed to all the kingdoms of the earth, to be a curse, and an astonishment, and an hissing, and a reproach, among all the nations

 

 

That the Jew has survived at all for the last twenty-five hundred years is a supernatural fact.  No other nation ever has or could endure similar treatment.  This fact is also the supernatural fulfilment of supernatural prophecies written twenty-five hundred years ago. “Thus saith the Lord, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; the Lord of hosts is his name: If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the Lord, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.  Thus saith the Lord: If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the Lord” (Jer. 31: 35-37).

- FREDERICK ERDMAN.

 

 

4. John Cournos well observes in his book that ‘the Christless acts of Christians’ have shaped the Jewish policy toward Christ and that “a truly practising Christianity might have at almost any time caused Judaism to melt as the snow melts away under the warm sun* Indeed whenever thoughtful Jews, eager to find the truth, come in contact with consecrated Christians, the impact of the Christ-centred life produces a revolutionary change in their thinking.  By far the greater number of Hebrew Christians were drawn to Christ through the silent witness of the lives of earnest Christians.  Professor Kohnstamm, of the University of Amsterdam, a noted scientist, attributed his original interest in Christ to several of his professors, who were devout Christians. - An Open Letter to Jews and Christians. pp. 74, 150.

 

 

He said:- “At this early stage in my philosophical thinking there appeared a person, who, in his quiet way, exercised a profound influence upon me.  He presented a rather extraordinary riddle in my matter-of-fact and rather superficial mental world.  My classmates related that this man, who was our chemistry teacher, strange as it seemed, went regularly to church on Sunday.  We could not interpret this behaviour as due to a lack of modem scientific knowledge, for his clear-cut objective and splendid instruction in chemistry were evidence of his sound scientific knowledge.  The only alternative explanation of this strange behaviour was that it emanated from some inexplicable external motive, and this explanation just did not fit.  None of us could deny the fact that everything he did was prompted by the greatest sincerity and earnestness ... Just as my teacher in chemistry in the high school had become a problem to me, so it was now the case with my university professor, Dr. van de Waals, one of the greatest scientists in the world, who was later a Nobel prize winner.  I came into close personal touch with him.  He was a man whose objectivity and deep humility were only surpassed by the great sincerity of his whole being.  This man, too - how could I explain it? - was a witness, even if usually a silent one, for that same Christianity which I had believed I could ignore as a message long since outgrown.”

 

 

5. The ritual murder calumny - the alleged Jewish sacrifice of children - is a relic of the days of witchcraft and “black magic”, a cruel and utterly baseless libel on Judaism.  Religious minorities other than the Jews, such as the early Christians, the Quakers, and Christian missionaries in China, have been victimized by it.  It has been denounced by the best men of all ages and creeds.  The Popes, the founders of the Reformation, the Khalif of Islam, statesmen of every country, together with all the great seats of learning in Europe, have publicly repudiated it.  The Archbishops of Canterbury and York, and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster.

 

 

“They come out of the night of years, with Asia in their blood,

Out of the mystery of time that was before the Flood.

They saw the sculptured, scarlet East shrink under the grey sands.

They saw the star of Hellas rise and glimmer into dream;

They saw the world of Rome draw suck beside the yellow stream -

And go with ravenous eyes ablaze and jaws that would not spare,

Snarling across the earth, then toothless die upon the lair.”

 

 

-------

 

 

“For I would not, brethren, have you ignorant of this mystery, lest ye be wise in your own conceits, that a hardening in part hath befallen Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in; and so ALL ISRAEL SHALL BE SAVED: even as it is written:

 

 

There shall come out of Zion a Deliverer;

He shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

And this is my covenant unto them,

When I shall take away their sins.

 

 

As touching the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sake.  For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.  For as ye in time past were disobedient to God, but now have obtained mercy by their disobedience, even so have these also now been disobedient, that by the mercy shewn to you they also may now obtain mercy.  For God hath shut up all unto disobedience, that he might have mercy upon all (Rom. 11: 25-32, R.V.).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

199

 

THE MUCH NEEDED INCENTIVE
THAT IS SO RARELY TAUGHT

 

 

BY ALBERT G. TINLEY

 

 

 

Our Lord (it is generally agreed) is the Nobleman going into a far country, to receive for Himself a Kingdom - and to return (Luke 19: 12-28), with the command to His ten servants: “Occupy till I come” (erchomai).  Left on their own - on probation, to test alike their loyalty and fidelity, their devotion and industry, in making the most, by “trading”, of the ten pounds entrusted to them, they were to be rewarded on His Return with positions of authority - ruling with Him - in His Kingdom.  “When He was returned, having received the Kingdom, then He commanded these servants to be called unto Him, to whom He had given the money, that He might know how much every man had gained by trading”.  This is the adjudication Parable, a Pre-view of the Bema (or Judgement Seat) of Christ.

 

 

This parable of the pounds in Luke is parallel in Matthew by the very similar parable of the talents in chapter 25: 13-30.  Here we have the introduction of the investigation and adjudication with a reference to the Lord’s long absence, now very close on 2,000 years (or two thousand year days by the parable of the Good Samaritan: Luke 10, where the “penny” or “denarius”, represented in the wherewithal of life for the morrow, for the reward or wage of the Labourers in the Vineyard was a denarius, the livelihood of the coming day: Matt. 20: 2 - earned by the determined and energetic 11th hour workmen in the little time left at their disposal).  In Luke 19: 16 we hear the industrious servant confessing: “Lord, Thy pound hath gained ten pounds” - and his reward was authority over ten cities (cf. Decapolis); in Matthew 25: 20 we hear the corresponding enterprising servant saying - without boasting, for the reward is not “of grace”, but [also] of [the regenerate believers’] works: “Behold, I have gained ... five talents more”.

 

 

The Lord’s “Well” of Luke 19: 17 is rightly rendered in Matthew 25: 21, 23 by “well done Rule over many things, and entrance into the joy of the Lord (for which He put up with the terrible Cross and the Agony in the Garden: Hebrews 12: 2) - the joy of enthronement at the Right Hand of the Father in Heaven: Revelation 3: 21- 22.  The Race of endurance is set before us, and The Good Agony (Greek) with its love of His appearing, and the Crown of Righteousness, awarded by the Righteous Judge, the Umpire and Adjudicator, Who has Himself already been awarded Crown and Throne and Sceptre: Hebrews 1: 8, 9; Psalms. 2: 6-9; Revelation 2: 26-27; 3: 21-22.  He has also been anointed (in Messiahship) with the oil of gladness (Joy) above His Fellows.

 

 

Here, then, is the much needed Incentive that is so rarely taught, to spur [regenerate] believers on; it is a Prize indeed, a Heavenly Calling - inspiring the Apostle Paul: Philippians 3: 10-14, to intense and all absorbing concentration of devotion.  So very many Christians drop out of the race (and even get off “course”) because they fancy all is of grace, and that they will be alright, though mere babes, born again, indeed, yet as being “saved” without works, and without hope - or knowledge - of this special Joy of the Lord - His Joy, set before Him, as the Incorruptible Crown - that [the Apostle] Paul strove for - is set before us: 1 Corinthians 9: 24-27 (where “castaway”  - rendered “rejected” in Hebrews 12: 17 - means disqualified for the Crown as Israel our danger-signal in the following chapter: 1 Corinthians 10: 1-12 - forfeited the Kingdom).

 

 

Here, then, also, is the much needed Caution, Warning, Threat - the possibility of positive Loss at the Judgement Seat of Christ, His Bema of adjudication, that most evangelists and Bible teachers avoid.

 

 

In the two parables quoted from, more space is given to the fearful and unprofitable, the wicked and slothful servant (whom most Expositors declare was no Servant at all!) who, again perhaps relying on “all of grace”, hid his Lord’s money, fancying it would be acceptable, when it represented to Him serious loss.  The Lord Who gives the increase of harvest, is Hard - upon the lazy, presumptuous, cowardly, profitless servants: but very few Christian Teachers will agree with this, or with me (who do not matter, except that I have to be faithful as a steward, and not a mere man [or woman] - pleaser.  So I repeat, disagreement with me will not prove you are right!!  The coming Kingdom is a Kingdom of Reward: Revelation 22: 12; 11: 18, entrance into it being the Prize for good works - as distinct from the Eternal Kingdom of Grace that follows - but who would deliberately choose darkness for the Thousand Years?  Here, then, are the Sanction and the Incentive that the flagging and flabby Church of today so badly needs.

 

 

1 John 2: 28, tells us of the possibility of our being ashamed away from Him at His Appearing, if we do not abide in Him, with His words abiding in us.

 

 

Now the Lord Jesus Christ - the Messiah, and Jehovah - informs us as to those of whom He Himself will be ashamed at His Return.  He Who is the Word of God identifies Himself with His words concerning the historicity and Creation (not Evolution!) of Adam and Eve (Mark 10: 16), concerning His Lordship, and the everlastingness of His utterances.

 

 

Do we make the Word of God of none effect through our (evangelical) traditions, and our denominational slogans? (“all of grace”; “by faith alone”).  What does “hiding in a napkin” mean? or “Light under a bushel”? or “under a bed”?

 

 

Could it mean that we have kept the sacred deposit of salvation to ourselves, never using our testimony to win others to the Lordship of the Messiah? or that we allowed business interests and advantages to seal our lips, and stop our witness?  We ought to be proud of God, and of His Word; we ought, too, to qualify ourselves to defend it, make it known as error-free - even free of alleged scientific mistakes, declaring it to be worthy of fullest acceptance, in view of the erroneous theories, and changing opinions of men, in these dark days of despair, uncertainty, apathy and fear.

 

 

It is very clear that not all believers will win Christ’s Kingdom of Reward, and earn His approval at His Judgement Seat: there are repeated catalogues of excluding sins: sexual impurity, anger, sectarianism and erroneous separatism that will shut [the guilty and unrepentant] believers out of the Kingdom of Reward for suffering and good works: 1 Corinthians 6: 9-10; Galatians 5: 19-21; Ephesians 5: 3-7; 1 Timothy 1: 9-10.   The teacher who asserts that these are impossible to [regenerate] Christians is, consciously or no, a deceiver, or even worse.  Once a [regenerate] believer gets out of touch with God, he/she can become guilty of almost anything.  “Be not partakers” implies that we can partake of sins, and of judgment.  Where are the informed and fearless teachers who dare proclaim these warnings?  The watchmen who are afraid to declare ‘the whole counsel of God’ [(Acts 20: 27, R.V.)] may suffer loss because of their lukewarmness, timidity, and disloyalty.

 

 

Will any one - any regenerate believer - presume when about to be beaten with many, or with few stripes, to oppose “all of grace”, boast of his/her freedom, by new birth, or at a great price, and his/her citizenship of the Heavenly Jerusalem?  But if so, will his/her threatened beating be averted? (Luke 12: 45-48).  We mostly use a little Bible within a Bible - full of promises, devoid of warnings, whether specifically to believers, or awful examples given in Old Testament; therefore, unhappy surprises - as well as happy ones - are in store for us.  But how little do we know the full revelation of God!  Why did I have to leave typewriter for concordance to get the reference to degrees of “stripes”?  Thank God for the exceeding great and precious promises - but do let us note any conditions attached, and make sure we qualify to inherit the blessing!

 

 

And why is all this indisputable Scriptural teaching unpopular, and unpalatable?

 

 

Why do we call the righteousness “filthy rags”, when they are nothing of the kind?  These words were spoken on behalf of Jewish religious hypocrites two or three thousand years ago (Isaiah 54); in contrast the good deeds of the people of God are called “fine white linen”; Revelation 19: 7-9.  Did the Lord call Mary’s deed a “good Work” - or a filthy rag?  Surely that would hardly be an incentive or an encouragement to doing good - which we can do, and many Christians actually do, some occasionally, some all the time, as the Word of God repeatedly affirms. (As empowered by the Holy Spirit, when we seek to walk in obedience to our Lord.) Teachers have no right - in fact they are quite wrong, to declare, stretching Romans 3: 12 unwarrantably and limitlessly, that no one ever did, does, or will do - indeed cannot ever do good.

 

 

The other way round, the “broad way” - easy, crowded, popular, pleasant - is removed from Christian possibility, together with stripes and darkness, and every threat and warning that even a blind outsider can clearly see are needed for regenerate believers.  The “broad way” is made non-applicable to the Church [of God], so that she is robbed of challenging sanctions, as well as of stimulating incentives, and so that every encouragement is given to “harmless” backsliding and unattractive drop-outs, yes, spiritual drop-outs, who once ran well!  The Pharisees “will be offended” at that saying; yes, but what was the Lord’s reply?  What was Paul’s example?

 

 

I for one, I hope, am taking no risks.  Paul was not sure of his Crown or Sceptre, or Throne - when the angelic heads abdicate (Revelation 4: 10; Hebrews 2: 5), in favour of Christ’s Fellows and Joint-Heirs, I shall certainty not cast that Crown down; so I have tried to encourage our people to sing: “Till we TAKE our crowns before Thee”.

 

 

My Incentive or Prize is thus approval at Christ’s Judgement Seat, it is being accounted worthy to live and reign with Him for ‘The Thousand Years’ BEFORE Eternity proper begins: Hebrews 4: 11; 2 Thessalonians 1: 5-7; 1 Corinthians 9: 24 to end; Philippians 3: 13-14; Revelation 2: 25-27; Revelation 3: 21.  My Sanction of Deterrent is “that no man take thy Crown”.  “The rest of the dead lived not again tilt The Thousand Years were finished”: Revelation 3: 11; 20: 5.

 

 

The First Advent of our Lord has been called a Reconnaissance visit, brief, but searching and revealing, in preparation for the Adjudication of the Millennial Kingdom with its living subjects and their rulers, the Overcomers accounted worthy of reigning with Christ for a Thousand Years on this earth.

 

 

This world-wide but temporary Kingdom, which the prophets [of God] foresaw and described, and which was heralded by John Baptist, by our Lord Himself, and by His Twelve Apostles, is itself but a foretaste - and sample in ‘the Age to Come’ [(Heb. 6: 5, R.V.)], of the Everlasting Kingdom of God: in the Ages of the Ages, or, “for ever and ever”, on the ‘New Earth’ [(Rev. 21: 1, R.V.)], in contrast to the reigning “for ever”, [i.e., for an ‘Age to come’, upon this restored, (Rom. 8: 19-21, R.V.) earth].*

 

[* See “The Dualism of Eternal Life” by S. S. CRAIG.]

 

 

As in the Millennial Kingdom of Reward for good works, for devotion and suffering, faithfulness unto death by all the martyrs (“chronic and acute”), there will be both Rulers and subjects, and a three-fold division of mankind as “Jews, and Gentiles, and the Church of God”, so apparently will it be in the Everlasting Kingdom of Grace on the ‘New Earth’, with its Metropolis, the New Jerusalem, descending from [God’s ‘new’] Heaven.

 

 

So must we reconcile any seeming discrepancy between Free Gift and Reward, which are taught so clearly, so emphatically, and so repeatedly, in the Gospels and Epistles, though so rarely distinguished by Christian teachers and evangelists.

 

 

The latter, often out of quick decisions often secure superficial and temporary results, unable to prove either incentive or sanction, since they make sweeping promises without conditions, warnings or threats, and ignore the “cautionary tale” and “awful example” of Israel’s history, and their failure to enter (or retain) their inheritance in the Promised Land.

 

 

Where is the challenge (taken up by the Apostles, especially Paul) to “forsake all”, and follow the Christ, the King?

 

 

Where is the distinction, indeed, the contrast, between faith and works, between gift and reward, between the “shaken” and the unshakable Kingdoms: Hebrews 12: 28, in our evangelical campaigns?

 

 

-------

 

 

INFORMATION ON THE AUTHOR

 

Albert George Tilney (1891 - 1976.)

 

 

Some of the works of A. G. Tinley include “The Glories Of The Messiah” and “The Kingdom is the Gospel”.

 

“Albert G. Tinley, B.A. Hons. (London) was senior modern languages master at Portsmouth Southern Secondary School and Pastor of Elm Grove Free Church, Hayling Island, Hants. ... his contribution to the [British Evolution Protest] Movement exceeded that of other secretaries in years of office, travel and literary output.  In addition to his pastoral duties and being the Secretary of the Prophecy Investigation Society, he was the author of a number of booklets and articles on prophecy.

 

Then as well as his voluminous correspondence as Secretary and Treasurer, he wrote over 100 of our pamphlets and booklets, and edited the Newsletter or Journal.  He travelled widely, lecturing and debating on evolution and the Scriptures, visiting Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and in 1972, the United States. On his world tour in 1968 he addressed large meetings arranged for him in schools. colleges and churches...” - (A Jubilee of Witness for Creation Against Evolution.)

 

 

The following quotation is from one of his many faithful, informative, and challenging prophetic writings:-

 

“Merit (or worthiness) it must be maintained in the teeth of all denial, as a condition and qualification for the First Resurrection... (Luke 20: 35). ... ‘Priests of God and Christ, they shall reign with him a thousand years’ ... not instead of eternally, but Millennially before eternity proper begins. Others - proud, indulgent, cowardly - are judged unworthy of Christ and of aeonian life. Now we know from several epistles that SOME BELIEVERS WILL BE EXCLUDED FROM THIS KINGDOM of Heaven and of God (Eph. 5: 5-8). ... We are warned... ‘the rest of the dead (saved and unsaved) lived not again until the 1000 years were ended’ (Rev. 20: 5).”

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

200

 

CHRISTIAN RESPONSIBILITY

 

 

BY D. M. PANTON

 

 

 

Our Lord devotes His fullest parable (Luke 19: 11-27) to covering the entire field of Christian responsibility for two thousand years.  For between the going away of the Nobleman to obtain a Kingdom (the Ascension) and his return (the Second Advent) stretches the exact period of the history of the Church, during which beside Christian believers there are on earth no ‘servants’ of God - a title by which the Apostles loved to describe themselves (Rom. 1: 1; 2 Pet. 1: 1; Jas. 1: 1; Jude 1).  As ‘child’ or ‘son’ is the title of privilege, so ‘servant’ is the title of responsibility, in one and the same man, who is both a member of the Family of God and a servant in the Household of Faith.

 

 

Now our Lord casts the main emphasis on the third servant - seven verses are devoted to the servant who was a failure, and only three each to the successful servants: therefore, on this servant’s identity depends Christ’s main teaching in the parable; and unless we understand that he may be ourselves, ours will be a concealed peril, like a man-trap hidden under forest-leaves.  For every [accountability] truth, appropriated, falls on the soul like an electric shock; whereas it is obvious that the [deceived] believer who denies the application of the passage

to himself, while he may be committing every offence of which the third servant can be guilty, so encases himself in a coat of steel that God’s sword falls on him blunted and harmless.  It is of vital import to know the spiritual standing of the third servant.

 

 

Now this servant is proved a [regenerate] child of God by the following facts.  (1) Equally with the other servants he is entrusted with our Lord’s goods on His ascension; but Christ has never entrusted, and never does entrust, His work on earth to the unsaved: therefore this is a saved soul equally with the rest.  Jesus calls them all “His own servants literally, “slaves bought with their Master’s money, and owned by Him.  The servants differ greatly in capacity - in the extremes, as five to one; but they differ not at all in the possession of a common trust.  (2) The three servants are judged together, at one spot and at one time; but the wicked dead - [regenerate and unregenerate alike, (Num. 16: 26. cf. 1 Cor. 5: 13; 6: 9; Gal. 5: 21ff.) etc.] - are not judged until the Great White Throne (Rev. 20: 5, 12), a thousand years after the judgment of the redeemed - [and “accounted worthy” (Lk. 20: 35. cf. Heb. 9: 27, R.V.)].  So also the slothful servant is judged last of the three, as last risen and last rapt; for he is “the servant which knew his Lord’s will, and made not ready, nor did according to His will” (Luke 12: 47).  Moreover, as this judgment is in the Parousia, the only access to which is by rapture, all the unsaved are of necessity physically excluded.  None can reach the [i.e., this prior] Judgment Seat except the saved.  (3) All three are judged, like the Seven Churches, solely on the ground of their works: their faith in, and love for, the absent King are implied and assumed: their standing is never challenged.  If the third servant were an unsaved soul, his works could in no way, and on no ground, be accepted: between the two Advents, it is the redeemed alone who are judged according to their works; for only those who have received from Christ can work for Him.  (4) Overwhelming is the final proof.  In the twin parable of the Pounds, the unsaved are placed in careful contrast with the saved, as Citizens and as Servants, the only two classes in the world, sharply sundering mankind: the Servants our Lord entrusts with His all on earth, the Citizens send the Message after the ascended Christ:- “We will not have this Man to reign over us  “Whilst the one Servant represents an inactive member of the body of Christ, the Church, who failed to perform his duty, these Citizens are open rebels, and hence their Lord orders them to be killed: it is evident that this penal proceeding is essentially distinguished from the reproof administered to the one Servant” (Olshausen).

 

 

So we arrive at the investigation itself.  Christ gives to each servant what He sees he can wisely use; as much as he can handle and profit by; no servant can say, ‘Lord, Thou gavest me nothing’: no servant is expected by Christ to produce results greater than his abilities or his opportunities; the poorest, the most unlettered, the most obscure have the ‘very little’ which yet can coin enormous future [blessings and millennial] wealth.  But the third servant so undervalues his opportunity as to bury his talent in the earth - in earthliness; his carnality is his shame because he is a child of God, and as such betrays his trust: “the circumstance rendering him guilty is, that he to whom the money belonged was no stranger to him, but his master, to whom he was bound as a servant” (Goebel).  For it is not the possession of the talents that determines our reward, but solely our use of them.  So Jesus describes the third servant as the exact opposite of the first two: instead of “good” and “faithful,” He says he is “wicked” and “slothful”: not “good” in the general sense, but a good servant and so not “bad” (or “wicked”) in a general sense, but a bad servant: the goodness of the one consisted in his faithfulness, the badness of the other in his sloth.  “This distinctive name comprehends all his guilt, Thou slothful servant” (Stier); unprofitable (Matt. 25: 30), but not unregenerate, or apostate he did not misemploy, nor embezzle, nor squander, but simply hid his money.  So what exactly does our Lord charge him with? Unbelief, un-regeneration, rebellion, apostasy, adultery, theft, murder?  Nay: it is simply a servant of God who has made nothing of his life; all he has done wrong is merely to withhold his powers from serving God; he hoarded, when he ought to have expended; he had no sacred sense of [accountability or personal] responsibility.  “The parable is not for gross sinners: the warning is for those who, being equipped of God for a sphere of activity in His kingdom, hide their talent” (Trench).  He says, As I cannot be so holy as God requires, I give up the attempt to satisfy such strictness: I object profoundly to the doctrine of reward according to works, and deny all responsibility in a servant of Christ beyond his responsibility to maintain the gift of grace with which he was entrusted at his conversion.  But his answer (as his Lord says) implies that he knew the truth.  The judge answers - Your very consciousness of the severity of the principle ought to have made you more careful, not less so, to meet its requirements.  “Thereby must the evil servant bear testimony with his own mouth to the innermost truth, and the most perfect right, according to which the Lord requires fruit from what He sows or gives - that God demands fruits and works” (Stier). For the believer to have at his judgment only what he had at his conversion (the one talent) will be his condemnation.  As his life had been negative, so is his punishment: he is cast into the darkness outside the brilliantly lit festal hall: “nothing is said here of any further punishment of the servant; enough that he has no part in the [coming millennial reign and] kingdom of the Lord” (Goebel).* Over lost opportunities, wasted graces, slighted privileges, a sold birthright, there is “weeping and gnashing of teeth**

 

* Since the Parousia is a place of thick darkness (Ps. 18: 9), indwelt by the Shekinah Glory (Matt. 16: 27), to he cast forth from the inner ring of light on that threshold of the kingdom is to be expelled into the external dark of the Pavilion of Cloud (Ps. 18: 11).

 

** “If the servant is not a believer, but a mere professor, then we have in the parable nothing to represent the Christian who fails in faithfulness” (C. C. Trumbull).  We have waited forty years for an answer to the question - “If the third servant is an unregenerate man, how comes he to he judged with the true servants of Christ when the wicked are not judged till a thousand years later, and how is he rapt into the Parousia”? - and we are waiting still.

 

 

Both the faithful servants come joyfully forward, for they have facts in their hands - the talents doubled; and both are invited at once into the joy of their Lord - our Lord’s joy in His Kingdom, for which He endured the cross, despising the shame, “the authority God will confer on Him on His second coming from heaven in kingly power and glory to establish the Messianic Kingdom” (Goebel).* So also would the third servant had he been found faithful.  “He has no share in the kingdom of his lord, and therefore he who is like him will have no share in the Kingdom of Christ” (Goebel).  Both faithful servants had exercised all their faculties and powers in the interests of their Master; the long delay in His return had not made them slothful or negligent, but, on the contrary, had afforded them longer time for greater gains; and what they had gained in the Church, they reap in the Kingdom.  The “well done” is conferred for no reason but one - because they have done well.  For the way to advance our own interests is to advance our Lord’s: each gained cent. per cent. for their Lord, and for each pound (Luke 19: 17) the reward is a city: the more devoted the life, the more blazing the glory.  No servant had more than one pound: no servant was without one pound: every servant had an equal opportunity of making ten pounds: yet ONLY ONE (so far as we know) did so.  “He that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give AUTHORITY OVER THE NATIONS, and he shall rule them with a rod of iron” (Rev. 2: 26, 27).  Then follows the judgment on the wicked among Israel and the Gentiles.  “When the King has thus distributed praise and blame, rewards and penalties, to those who stand in the more immediate relations of servants to Him, to those of His own household, He proceeds to execute vengeance on His enemies, on all who had openly cast off allegiance to Him, and denied that they belonged to His House at all” (Trench).

 

*It must he the Millennial Kingdom, for our Lord’s everlasting Kingdom as the Son of God - as distinct from the kingdom the Nobleman goes away to obtain (Luke 19: 12) - is inherently His, without beginning or end, never conferred.  “Of the Son He saith, Thy throne, O God, is FOR EVER AND EVER” (Heb. 1: 8).

 

 

Thus we confront our crisis.  Officers are required for the administration of a kingdom: so God has deliberately interposed a prolonged period between the two advents, that our Lord might be enabled so to test His servants, in His absence, as to discover which are fitted for positions of responsibility and trust at His return.  The Nobleman, before He departed, laid plans for the selection of officers to aid Him in the administration of the Kingdom; He devised a plan for bringing to light who those officers are on His return; this plan is in operation at the present moment, purposely so contrived as to reveal individual capacity for office, and personal fitness for trust; and - most impressive of all - the Long Journey is now nearly over, and at any moment the investigation may begin.  “Make haste about cultivating a Christ-like character.  The harvest is great; the toil is heavy; the sun is drawing to the west; the reckoning is at hand.  There is no time to lose; set about it as you have never done before, and say, ‘This one thing I do’” (A. Maclaren).

 

 

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

 

 

 

[Photograph above by Derek Hawthorne (Portstewart).]

 

 

To be continued, D.V.